If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(News.com.au) Dumbass OWS figure who may also be Conan O'Brien's estranged twin, exposed as a fraud after accepting publicly funded art grants   (news.com.au) divider line 58
More: Dumbass, Occupy Melbourne, Carl Scrase, Conan O'Brien, Federal Government ArtStart, lord mayor, value for money, grants, Herald Sun  
•       •       •

9692 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Dec 2011 at 6:47 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



58 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-05 04:04:34 PM
How is that hypocritical? If you support OWS you're more likely to support publicly-funded arts programs as it's not a system built on considerations of profit only.
 
2011-12-05 04:04:46 PM
How does this make him a hypocrite? Did he suddenly turn into a corrupt billionaire who purchases legislation with bribes to politicians?
 
2011-12-05 04:06:33 PM
Psst, subby, it's the Tea Party that hates publicly funded art grants
 
2011-12-05 04:30:28 PM
While I may think publicly funded arts programs are a waste of money, that doesn't make him a hypocrite. I also don't see how OWS would be against publicly funded arts programs in general
 
2011-12-05 04:31:46 PM
I don't get how this...yeah, what the previous 5 comments said.
 
2011-12-05 04:42:31 PM
coco ebert: How is that hypocritical? If you support OWS you're more likely to support publicly-funded arts programs as it's not a system built on considerations of profit only.

How many times has he been granted public art fund money? How many artists in Melbourne haven't been granted any at all?

He's a hypocrite because he's a 1%er -- happy to enrich himself even if it means other, poorer people lose out. He embodies the greed he claims to oppose.
 
2011-12-05 04:49:42 PM
gerrymander: coco ebert: How is that hypocritical? If you support OWS you're more likely to support publicly-funded arts programs as it's not a system built on considerations of profit only.

How many times has he been granted public art fund money? How many artists in Melbourne haven't been granted any at all?

He's a hypocrite because he's a 1%er -- happy to enrich himself even if it means other, poorer people lose out. He embodies the greed he claims to oppose.


Sense, you're not making any. How is he a 1%er? He got a grant of under $20,000. In what way does that make him part of the class of people that own the majority of the wealth?
 
2011-12-05 05:12:45 PM
Welcome to your GOP Talking Point Thread of the Day for December 5th, 2011.
 
2011-12-05 05:27:01 PM
gerrymander: coco ebert: How is that hypocritical? If you support OWS you're more likely to support publicly-funded arts programs as it's not a system built on considerations of profit only.

How many times has he been granted public art fund money? How many artists in Melbourne haven't been granted any at all?

He's a hypocrite because he's a 1%er -- happy to enrich himself even if it means other, poorer people lose out. He embodies the greed he claims to oppose.


Cue Ronald McDonald WTF am I reading pic
 
2011-12-05 05:28:29 PM
My head asplode.

This artist from Australia who was awarded 2 grants totaling 12,00- AU and won a prize worth $5,000 AU is somehow proof of the 'fraud' of OWS?

Poor guys, is that all you've got?
 
2011-12-05 05:39:37 PM
One more time for the cheap seats:

OWS != anti-capitalism

Thank you, you may continue.
 
2011-12-05 06:49:19 PM
He's a hypocrite because he has made BILLIONS off these art grants which makes him part of the 1%
 
2011-12-05 06:53:15 PM
Does anyone here actually think facts matter to whackadoodles, this article is just linking two perceived negatives from the fascist viewpoint and that is all needs to be done with those morons. Momentum will do the rest with stories like these. It is a classic Rovian tactic. By the time anyone can debunk this, they will have made up 5 more lies and pumped out through their shiat stained mouths.
 
2011-12-05 06:53:27 PM
timujin: One more time for the cheap seats:

OWS != anti-capitalism

Thank you, you may continue.


Furthermore, this guy was apparently "pro-getting a government grant for his art." Which has absolutely zero to do with capitalism one way or another.

/ Try again, dumbasstardsubby.
 
2011-12-05 06:53:27 PM
Scrase told the Herald Sun he was a "social entrepreneur"

Australia has weird names for human parasites.

/I'd have called them chazzwozzers
 
2011-12-05 06:54:03 PM
gerrymander: He's a hypocrite because he's a 1%er -- happy to enrich himself even if it means other, poorer people lose out. He embodies the greed he claims to oppose.

Wha...? Did you do Enron's accounting, by any chance?
 
2011-12-05 06:55:01 PM
I really, really don't get this. I can usually follow the faux right wing outrage machine, but I'm completely baffled by this one.

He's a hypocrite because he accepted public money set aside for art?

Wait, I think I'm starting to see it. OWS is pissed because banks received public funds. This guy received public funds, and was an OWS protestor. Therefore, HE'S A HYPOCRITE!

Ok, never mind. I see it now. It's completely retarded, but I see it.
 
2011-12-05 06:55:02 PM
What's that smell? Oh yes, desperation on the barbie.
 
2011-12-05 06:55:38 PM
The Face Of Oblivion: Scrase told the Herald Sun he was a "social entrepreneur"

Australia has weird names for human parasites.

/I'd have called them chazzwozzers


I'm assuming you'd agree to anyone in your family, ancestral or friend circle being called a "human parasite" for accepting any government money for anything, like food stamps, military service, or social security?

/ Of course you'd be consistent. Why wouldn't you?
 
2011-12-05 06:57:16 PM
"If we are so terrible and they have to occupy us indefinitely until capitalism falls, well then where are they going to get their grants from?"

Are you suggesting capitalism is government?
 
2011-12-05 06:57:17 PM
gerrymander: coco ebert: How is that hypocritical? If you support OWS you're more likely to support publicly-funded arts programs as it's not a system built on considerations of profit only.

How many times has he been granted public art fund money? How many artists in Melbourne haven't been granted any at all?

He's a hypocrite because he's a 1%er -- happy to enrich himself even if it means other, poorer people lose out. He embodies the greed he claims to oppose.


TravisBickle62: He's a hypocrite because he has made BILLIONS off these art grants which makes him part of the 1%

img.tgfb.net
 
2011-12-05 06:59:31 PM
Make More Hinjews: I'm assuming you'd agree to anyone in your family, ancestral or friend circle being called a "human parasite" for accepting any government money for anything, like food stamps, military service, or social security?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_parasites

It was a joke about the tendency of people who do annoy others and feel smug about it to categorize themselves with euphemisms that put others in mind of "pubic louse" and similar phrases. Not a joke about the fact that he received any specific money. "Social entrepreneur" is about on par with "management consultant" and "teamwork facilitator." But keep farking that chicken...
 
2011-12-05 06:59:50 PM
But it still doesn't answer the question: why was he taking chin growth hormone?
 
2011-12-05 07:00:44 PM
This is just the first salvo in making the claim that individuals who took grants for college are the same as corporations who received bailouts.

Or hell, maybe it's the 10,000th salvo. I've lost track.
 
2011-12-05 07:01:27 PM
Well I heard a 1%er threw a quarter in a Salvation Army bucket today so its a wash.
 
2011-12-05 07:02:36 PM
those occupy melbourne peeps are freakin smart

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zKMwigI3mdM
 
2011-12-05 07:04:58 PM
Most people would claim he is the perfect example of an "Occupier". He takes redistributed money from the government which comes from other peoples taxes while generating nothing of value for society.
 
2011-12-05 07:06:46 PM
gblive: Most people would claim he is the perfect example of an "Occupier". He takes redistributed money from the government which comes from other peoples taxes while generating nothing of value for society.

He did a thingy with paper clips, how is that not of value?
 
2011-12-05 07:11:18 PM
The Face Of Oblivion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_parasites

It was a joke about the tendency of people who do annoy others and feel smug about it to categorize themselves with euphemisms that put others in mind of "pubic louse" and similar phrases. Not a joke about the fact that he received any specific money. "Social entrepreneur" is about on par with "management consultant" and "teamwork facilitator." But keep farking that chicken...


No part of that makes any sense at all. But keep farking that chicken...
 
2011-12-05 07:16:20 PM
Sometimes I wish I had to ability to see the tortured string of logic that leads to connections like accepting awards and grants to being a hypocrite, but I'm pretty sure I'd have to remove all logic I've ever known for that to work.
 
2011-12-05 07:19:16 PM
I get to comments like Gerrymanders, and I'm just like WTF.

FK U GERRY.

More smear campaigning against OWS by the 'fourth house'. As decrepit a house as the others.
I say DON'T tear them down, BURN them down.
 
2011-12-05 07:22:53 PM
MrEricSir: Your name scared me.

That's what we used to call my naval captain father. I saw your handle and flashed on all the lewd content I've posted over the years.

/thank god it's not you, Dad
//...right?
 
2011-12-05 07:35:10 PM
He's obviously a hypocrite - because $17,000 makes him a billionaire.
 
2011-12-05 07:41:04 PM
How long will people like Carl Scrase control eighty percent of the world's jaw line. Ninety nine percent of us have decreasing jaw lines, while theirs are still increasing. It all goes back to the Hapsbergs and their dominance over Europe jaws through the centuries. It's time for a change toward proportionate jaw lines here and now!
 
2011-12-05 07:48:38 PM
Long-lost triplets! (new window)
 
2011-12-05 07:48:44 PM
What is this article, I don't even...
 
2011-12-05 08:20:04 PM
looks more like the pilot from firefly
 
2011-12-05 08:26:01 PM
The guy is "pro-taking money from productive taxpayers" how is that not what OWS is about?

/where's my free stuff?
 
2011-12-05 08:28:05 PM
FTFA: "Derp, derp, derp."
 
2011-12-05 08:28:42 PM
moothemagiccow: looks more like the pilot from firefly

www.fantastic-realities.com

Don't really see the resemblance... He looks more like Conan, but with a normal-sized head.
 
2011-12-05 08:31:35 PM
Hobodeluxe: How does this make him a hypocrite?

I think "hypocrite" must mean something different in Australia, much like "OWS figure" apparently does.
 
2011-12-05 08:37:10 PM
Yeah, I really am an artist-and this idiot's ability to score grant money for his projects is nauseating-does this noob even know how to draw a stick figure? Nope, but he sure can write for grants. You all may think that he did'nt get a lot of money, but, then again, what is the total of all of his grants? He's a well connected trust fund baby, gets some cash to splash, gets his rich friends to buy his "art" and writes for more grants.
 
2011-12-05 09:17:25 PM
He's not being a hypocrite. It's exactly what Occupiers want...free money.
 
2011-12-05 09:21:00 PM
Fade2black: He's not being a hypocrite. It's exactly what Occupiers want...free money.

So they wish to be treated like the 1%, yeah I can see that.
 
2011-12-05 09:36:05 PM
Fade2black: He's not being a hypocrite. It's exactly what Occupiers want...free money.

If by "free money" you mean socioeconomic mobility, then yes.
 
2011-12-05 09:39:46 PM
OWS figure who may also be Conan O'Brien's estranged twin, exposed as a fraud after accepting publicly funded art grants

Must run in the family. Conan bilked the network out of millions pretending to be funny.
 
2011-12-05 09:40:42 PM
It pays to be a shiatty artist.
 
2011-12-05 10:02:54 PM
While gets grants and lives the good life for doing something useless, others do without basic necessities.
That is the problem. The "arts" should never receive public money. They help no one but the "artist"
 
2011-12-05 10:28:10 PM
Isn't OWS 15 minutes about up?
 
2011-12-05 10:28:26 PM
jehovahs witness protection: for doing something useless,

if art is so useless then i implore you to throw away every single movie, album, book, and decoration in your home. because they're all useless according to you.
 
Displayed 50 of 58 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »