If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(New York Daily News) Obvious Mother Palin needs to scoop up Mitt Romney, ruffle his perfectly coiffed hair, hold him to her bosom, and explain to the Tea Party faithful that it's OK to vote for a Northeast Liberal elitist that believes in some scary moon God   (nydailynews.com) divider line 124
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

2139 clicks; posted to Politics » on 05 Dec 2011 at 10:01 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



124 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-05 09:23:35 AM
Maybe she could sign on as his running mate.
 
2011-12-05 09:33:16 AM
upload.wikimedia.org

Aww, Luna ain't so scary.
 
2011-12-05 09:47:42 AM
No.
 
2011-12-05 09:59:45 AM
Why? Does the author want Romney to lose?

Take a brief look at where the people who won her support and endorsements are today. Are people still hanging onto this idea that Palin is some sort of political super-genius?

Wake up. You fell for a con woman.
 
2011-12-05 10:06:05 AM
And then flying pigs flew out of my ass.
 
2011-12-05 10:06:57 AM
Sacrilege! The Moon is a goddess!
 
2011-12-05 10:10:41 AM
What happened to that lady? Did she shart her pantsuit at an event? I didn't think she could stay quiet this long.
 
2011-12-05 10:11:23 AM
Romney just needs to keep doing what he's been doing and waiting for the more popular candidates to flame out.
 
2011-12-05 10:14:43 AM
HotWingConspiracy: What happened to that lady? Did she shart her pantsuit at an event? I didn't think she could stay quiet this long.

What do you mean? She's still a regular contributor to highly respected political journals such as Twitter and Facebook.
 
2011-12-05 10:15:59 AM
Diogenes: Why? Does the author want Romney to lose?

Take a brief look at where the people who won her support and endorsements are today. Are people still hanging onto this idea that Palin is some sort of political super-genius?

Wake up. You fell for a con woman.


Not a genius. A gateway to the drooling masses.

Saint Sarah represents a constituency (how or why, I have no idea. But that's not important right now). If you don't think that the Gingrich and Romney campaign are making veiled overtures to her and her crowd, you're insane. They need that base to vote next November, else they'll lose everything they gained in 2010.
 
2011-12-05 10:16:01 AM
Is this the thread where someone will biatch that if you ignore Palin, she'll go away, forgetting that we're coming into an election where people will specifically seek her out for an endorsement?

Yep, I think it is!!!
 
2011-12-05 10:16:03 AM
Only morons care what Sarah Palin has to say about...well, anything.

If one has to pander to morons by kowtowing to Palin to get the GOP nod, that says a lot about the state of the GOP base these days.
 
2011-12-05 10:16:17 AM
assets.nydailynews.com
dat ass.
 
2011-12-05 10:19:45 AM
I was expecting Cain to set up an agreement for her to run under his name in the states for which the filing date is already past.
 
2011-12-05 10:20:40 AM
I'm still dreaming of a Palin/Trump third party run.

Their slogan:"I Quit!/You're Fired!"
 
2011-12-05 10:21:13 AM
Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

That's the detail I don't buy. The importance of that constituency, I can't deny. I just don't believe she's that influential anymore.
 
2011-12-05 10:23:45 AM
It IS a nice bosom
 
2011-12-05 10:24:44 AM
theknuckler_33: [assets.nydailynews.com image 485x294]
dat ass.


Problem wit dat ass?

// first thing I thought of was "Alaskan Trollface"
 
2011-12-05 10:25:38 AM
Hollie Maea: I was expecting Cain to set up an agreement for her to run under his name in the states for which the filing date is already past.

Oh he has a 'filing date' with her.
 
2011-12-05 10:29:49 AM
Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: Why? Does the author want Romney to lose?

Take a brief look at where the people who won her support and endorsements are today. Are people still hanging onto this idea that Palin is some sort of political super-genius?

Wake up. You fell for a con woman.

Not a genius. A gateway to the drooling masses.

Saint Sarah represents a constituency (how or why, I have no idea. But that's not important right now). If you don't think that the Gingrich and Romney campaign are making veiled overtures to her and her crowd, you're insane. They need that base to vote next November, else they'll lose everything they gained in 2010.


They'd have gained even more without that constituency nominating crazies in several key races
 
2011-12-05 10:32:17 AM
Dr. Whoof: Is this the thread where someone will biatch that if you ignore Palin, she'll go away, forgetting that we're coming into an election where people will specifically seek her out for an endorsement?

i536.photobucket.com

Thx to Fark In The Duck
 
2011-12-05 10:33:45 AM
Diogenes: Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

That's the detail I don't buy. The importance of that constituency, I can't deny. I just don't believe she's that influential anymore.


"Influential to whom?", I guess, is the follow-up question.

The GOP needs the Tea Party "base" - they're the older, whiter, male-r, Christian-er, less-educated group that enables the older, whiter, richer "establishment" GOP. The 2010 gains were zombie gains, as the GOP saw large increases in turnout (relative to 2008), but of a demographic that has been shrinking as a percentage of the electorate for 30 years.

The Tea Party still likes Sarah Palin. They're still trying to get her to run in Iowa (and probably other places, too. I wonder about Alaska). If she says "Vote Romney", 80% of them will.

I guess not knowing how big the TP is in 2012 is the rub. I don't see them making any sort of gains like they did last year, and if they have to suck it up and Romney's the candidate, I see TP turnout at 30-40% of last year's.

// with Obama at the top of the ticket, I look for better Democratic turnout, too
// I hope they win back the House, but I'm not betting on it
 
2011-12-05 10:34:28 AM
I came for the bosom, am leaving disappointed.
 
2011-12-05 10:40:01 AM
Diogenes: Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

That's the detail I don't buy. The importance of that constituency, I can't deny. I just don't believe she's that influential anymore.


Not in the main stream, but there is definately a lingering pool of narrow-minded, ill-informed, xenophobic "patriots" that would follow any endorsement she gave.
 
2011-12-05 10:42:54 AM
Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

That's the detail I don't buy. The importance of that constituency, I can't deny. I just don't believe she's that influential anymore.

"Influential to whom?", I guess, is the follow-up question.

The GOP needs the Tea Party "base" - they're the older, whiter, male-r, Christian-er, less-educated group that enables the older, whiter, richer "establishment" GOP. The 2010 gains were zombie gains, as the GOP saw large increases in turnout (relative to 2008), but of a demographic that has been shrinking as a percentage of the electorate for 30 years.

The Tea Party still likes Sarah Palin. They're still trying to get her to run in Iowa (and probably other places, too. I wonder about Alaska). If she says "Vote Romney", 80% of them will.

I guess not knowing how big the TP is in 2012 is the rub. I don't see them making any sort of gains like they did last year, and if they have to suck it up and Romney's the candidate, I see TP turnout at 30-40% of last year's.

// with Obama at the top of the ticket, I look for better Democratic turnout, too
// I hope they win back the House, but I'm not betting on it


You also have to consider the impact of Bachmann. She's made some statements about the other GOP candidates that are strong enough that they are going to be very hard for her to walk back (frugal socialists) and support the eventual nominee.

I still think there is decent chance of some sort of Tea Party candidate in the general election taking off a few percentage points from the Republicans.
 
2011-12-05 10:44:48 AM
Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

Bingo. She represents that 12-20% that is always doing crazy shiat.
Amendment to ban water? Loses 88% to 12%
Law forcing all people to be sterilizied? Loses 80% to 20%
Proclamation stating slavery was bad? Passes 84% - 16%


You know, shiat that's too crazy to pass/not pass that always seems to have those 12%-25%ers voting the opposite way.
IIRC there was a book about these people or it was on TDS
 
2011-12-05 10:49:51 AM
Will Romney have to show up somewhere in leather if he's endorsed by Palin?
 
2011-12-05 10:53:33 AM
Philip Francis Queeg: Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

That's the detail I don't buy. The importance of that constituency, I can't deny. I just don't believe she's that influential anymore.

"Influential to whom?", I guess, is the follow-up question.

The GOP needs the Tea Party "base" - they're the older, whiter, male-r, Christian-er, less-educated group that enables the older, whiter, richer "establishment" GOP. The 2010 gains were zombie gains, as the GOP saw large increases in turnout (relative to 2008), but of a demographic that has been shrinking as a percentage of the electorate for 30 years.

The Tea Party still likes Sarah Palin. They're still trying to get her to run in Iowa (and probably other places, too. I wonder about Alaska). If she says "Vote Romney", 80% of them will.

I guess not knowing how big the TP is in 2012 is the rub. I don't see them making any sort of gains like they did last year, and if they have to suck it up and Romney's the candidate, I see TP turnout at 30-40% of last year's.

// with Obama at the top of the ticket, I look for better Democratic turnout, too
// I hope they win back the House, but I'm not betting on it

You also have to consider the impact of Bachmann. She's made some statements about the other GOP candidates that are strong enough that they are going to be very hard for her to walk back (frugal socialists) and support the eventual nominee.

I still think there is decent chance of some sort of Tea Party candidate in the general election taking off a few percentage points from the Republicans.


I would bet a Trump/Palin ticket would pull 10% in the general, because the american electorate is indeed that stupid.
 
2011-12-05 10:58:50 AM
Philip Francis Queeg: Dr Dreidel: Diogenes: Dr Dreidel: Saint Sarah represents a constituency

You also have to consider the impact of Bachmann. She's made some statements about the other GOP candidates that are strong enough that they are going to be very hard for her to walk back (frugal socialists) and support the eventual nominee.

I still think there is decent chance of some sort of Tea Party candidate in the general election taking off a few percentage points from the Republicans.


True, however, Bachmann doesn't have Sarah's gravitas (there do not exist quotation marks powerful enough to make that word sarcastic enough to be appropriate, so I omit them entirely).

Sarah was running for VP of the nation - yes, yes - not of California Alaska. Bachmann represents the only state that voted for HUBERT HUMPHREY, for the gods' sakes.

Naw, but I think that she doesn't have the profile because she's just an also-ran of American Jesusfreaks, while Palin is the Patron Saint of American Jesusfreaks.
 
2011-12-05 10:58:52 AM
moon good? no, Kolob is a planet.
 
2011-12-05 11:02:58 AM
utah dude: moon good? no, Kolob is a planet.

I think subby was going for a "Sheldon's Mom" sort of style. Like when she says of Raj, "...whatever third world demons you're possessed by."
 
2011-12-05 11:04:18 AM
Diogenes: Why? Does the author want Romney to lose?

Take a brief look at where the people who won her support and endorsements are today. Are people still hanging onto this idea that Palin is some sort of political super-genius?

Wake up. You fell for a con woman.


By comparison, she is a political genius thanks to just how goddamn stupid her base is. You almost can't blame her for taking advantage of them.
 
2011-12-05 11:04:49 AM
Mother Palin was able to withstand the worse the Spanish Inquisition could throw at her.

/Or was that Mother Idle?
 
2011-12-05 11:07:33 AM
I work with a guy that thinks Sarah Palin can be a 'kingmaker'. He also believes that Perry gaffed because he just had surgery, (new Hampshire), and that he's just not a good public speaker (you don't have that luxury when you are running for president, sorry). He also says Herman Cain is totally innocent, because all the accusers have ties to David Axelrod. He had no clue about the fruitiness (percieved) of Marcus Bachmann,and sees nothing wrong with praying gay away. He thought Sarah Palin was right about Paul Revere. He can quote statistics about ice core samples he thinks can disprove global warming. serious weapons-grade derp right there.
 
2011-12-05 11:11:00 AM
This is one of those threads where I'm fairly confident that the headline is at least partially tongue-in-cheek, but the responses, and the counter-responses, and counter-counter-responses, leave me increasingly confused as to who is and is not speaking with a straight face.

Sometimes I worry that our politics are sliding almost entirely into even-I'm-not-sure-when-I'm-serious-any-more chuckleheadedness.
 
2011-12-05 11:11:00 AM
Diogenes: utah dude: moon good? no, Kolob is a planet.

I think subby was going for a "Sheldon's Mom" sort of style. Like when she says of Raj, "...whatever third world demons you're possessed by."


If anyone has connections to the demon world, it's a fundamentalist christian mother. and i'm a christian saying that.
 
2011-12-05 11:11:41 AM
tequilasundae: I work with a guy that thinks Sarah Palin can be a 'kingmaker'. He also believes that Perry gaffed because he just had surgery, (new Hampshire), and that he's just not a good public speaker (you don't have that luxury when you are running for president, sorry). He also says Herman Cain is totally innocent, because all the accusers have ties to David Axelrod. He had no clue about the fruitiness (percieved) of Marcus Bachmann,and sees nothing wrong with praying gay away. He thought Sarah Palin was right about Paul Revere. He can quote statistics about ice core samples he thinks can disprove global warming. serious weapons-grade derp right there.

All that hard work and research is going to pay off real soon. Just you wait.
 
2011-12-05 11:22:16 AM
Her harpy voice is all I need to tune her out.
 
2011-12-05 11:25:13 AM
"Mother Palin". Got it. But it was funnier when I thought the headline said "Michael Palin".

And now that I'm picturing it with Michael Palin dressed as Sarah Palin, it's even funnier! Buy the man a pantsuit and a pair of Tina Fey frames, I'm voting Palin and Palin this year strictly for the lulz!

/I mean I'm voting for them to host the Academy Awards. Anything else would be f*ckin' insane.
 
2011-12-05 11:26:07 AM
"I listen to that Sputnik talk over and over again and I think we don't need another one of those. You know what we need is a Spudnut moment"
 
2011-12-05 11:28:05 AM
Giggity?
 
2011-12-05 11:28:18 AM
Dr Dreidel: The Tea Party still likes Sarah Palin. They're still trying to get her to run in Iowa (and probably other places, too. I wonder about Alaska). If she says "Vote Romney", 80% of them will.

I doubt it. Tea Party leaders in Iowa are stating that many of their members are taking a second look at Newt. Contrary to popular belief they aren't brainless dolts who do what ever someone in power tells them too. A Romney endorsement by Palin could break one of two ways:

1) It gives him momentum and siphons off some support from Newt
2) Palin demonstrates that she's not as ideologically pure as she has portrayed herself and is cast as now "just another Republican Establishment person pushing their favored candidate" and she then looses much of her base as they feel betrayed.

Romney is *not* the Tea Party candidate and the Tea Party isn't dumb enough to run a third party in the General knowing that it would just be handing the White House back to Obama. I think Palin is currently waiting to see which way the wind is blowing, but I don't see her endorsing Romney anytime soon. She may follow in Cains footsteps who is supposedly going to endorse Newt today - but that's pure speculation.
 
2011-12-05 11:31:03 AM
Can I just say that Palin's endorsement doesn't have any weight anymore? Since she decided not to run she lost the defacto GOP seal of approval rubberstamp.
 
2011-12-05 11:33:09 AM
CanisNoir: Romney is *not* the Tea Party candidate and the Tea Party isn't dumb enough to run a third party in the General knowing that it would just be handing the White House back to Obama.

I think this makes sense since whomever they could offer up would not have independent and cross party appeal.

But, with that said, they have backed candidates out of ideological purity even when it meant losing the race. Is their distaste of Obama strong enough to make them compromise on purity? I honestly don't know.
 
2011-12-05 11:33:45 AM
Diogenes: Why? Does the author want Romney to lose?

Take a brief look at where the people who won her support and endorsements are today. Are people still hanging onto this idea that Palin is some sort of political super-genius?

Wake up. You fell for a con woman.


The people Mitt needs the support of [within the GOP base] are exactly the people that would vote for a Palin/Palin ticket.
 
2011-12-05 11:33:48 AM
The liberals handled him and therefore he can't be allowed in the nest. RINO! RINO! the horrifying harpy screeches as baby Mitt is ejected from the nest, before she regurgitates talking point to nourish the pure offspring of her bizarre couplings.

The GOP is farked and the media simply must create the impression that they aren't.
 
2011-12-05 11:35:40 AM
Diogenes: Is their distaste of Obama strong enough to make them compromise on purity? I honestly don't know.

It must really be burning some of the GOP strategists up inside, when their "best" candidate happens to be a heretic the "wrong kind" of Christian.
 
2011-12-05 11:36:49 AM
Philip Francis Queeg: You also have to consider the impact of Bachmann. She's made some statements about the other GOP candidates that are strong enough that they are going to be very hard for her to walk back (frugal socialists) and support the eventual nominee.

Nah. Bachmann will deny making those statements and talk about how she's disappointed she didn't win, but it's up to the Tea Party to support the Republican candidate for the good of the party and/or to stop the corruption of America.
 
2011-12-05 11:37:34 AM
CanisNoir: Tea Party leaders in Iowa are stating that many of their members are taking a second look at Newt. Contrary to popular belief they aren't brainless dolts who do what ever someone in power tells them too.

If they're looking at Newt, it's because someone in power told them to. He was polling in single digits for months.
 
2011-12-05 11:42:09 AM
Romney's a Muslim now?
 
Displayed 50 of 124 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »