If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Patriot Ledger) Stupid Girl sues school because she sent naked pictures to another student and the obvious happened   (patriotledger.com) divider line 117
More: Stupid, Jane Doe, nude photography, sexual harassments, charter schools, Title IX, compensatory damages, male students, guidance counselor  
•       •       •

13680 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Dec 2011 at 9:43 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



117 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-02 09:45:02 AM
The recipient forwarded the pics to everyone he knew, and some teacher caught wind of it?

/did she died?
 
2011-12-02 09:46:04 AM
Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

clinton4.nara.gov
 
2011-12-02 09:47:43 AM
FTFA: "The lawsuit says Dickens could have suspended the male student for being charged with a felony but did not."

Well it's not like he was burping or anything.
 
2011-12-02 09:48:22 AM
Sounds to me like she has a case.
 
2011-12-02 09:49:13 AM
angie varona?
 
2011-12-02 09:49:47 AM
You know what?

If you send a guy naked pictures of yourself just because he asked, Then yes, you're a whore. Or you were at 14.

And that's okay.

Jesus Loved Whores, too. Get over it. It's just your body.

Your children will never know (unless you tell them). It will probably turn your future husband on. No you'll probably never marry a Kennedy, but that's okay you probably weren't going to anyhow. I'd practice getting your game on to meet the awesome rep you're going to have.
 
2011-12-02 09:50:00 AM
She says she developed eating disorders, attempted suicide attention whored several times
 
2011-12-02 09:50:14 AM
I'm not usually a grammar nazi, but that headline makes me want to shoot myself in the head while inside a bunker in Berlin.
 
2011-12-02 09:51:02 AM
rubi_con_man: If you send a guy naked pictures of yourself just because he asked, Then yes, you're a whore

dayum, fark be full of them.
 
2011-12-02 09:51:54 AM
Porous Horace: FTFA: "The lawsuit says Dickens could have suspended the male student for being charged with a felony but did not."

Well it's not like he was burping or anything.


The article says that the kid was a relative of Dickens...
 
2011-12-02 09:53:23 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


Wrong thread, chucklefark.
 
2011-12-02 09:53:55 AM
Andrew Wiggin: angie varona?

it's gotta be
 
2011-12-02 09:53:58 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


The fark?
 
2011-12-02 09:54:17 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


Well, that wasn't the obvious result that came to my mind, but feel free to go with it.
 
2011-12-02 09:54:25 AM
She is suing for a failure to protect her from harassment. Simply from what the article says, counselors did nothing to attempt to intervene when this was brought to their attention. While the school suggests the formal complaint was not filled, some paperwork should be available about her interactions with counselors, and the counselors should have directed her to file the complaint. Any acknowledgement of the incidents by the school would be rather damning because most American schools require reporting and certain procedures in order to protect themselves.

Of course, one side from a lawsuit so some specifics are lacking.
 
2011-12-02 09:54:35 AM
Andrew Wiggin: angie varona?

That was my first thought.

She's striving to become the next Tila Tequila - some vapid, no brain, attention whore with a really great body
 
2011-12-02 09:55:28 AM
She should have gone to the feds and had him busted for child porn.
 
2011-12-02 09:56:18 AM
Just ignore dem. Dey is photoshopped.
 
2011-12-02 09:57:32 AM
In the lawsui, the woman claims that in October 2007 a 17-year-old male student identified as "RJ" asked her to send him nude photos. When she did, he "sexted" them via cell phone and on the Internet. She was then subjected to "relentless and unremitting sexual harassment," and called "whore."

The school can't do anything about the pictures (although if she was 14 the cops certainly can and the school should have contacted them), but they could have doens something about the name calling and the assault (if it happend on school, if nto they shoudl have contacted the cops).
 
2011-12-02 09:57:41 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


Uh....ok...I guess...oh, fark it. WTF?
 
2011-12-02 09:58:11 AM
ss or it didn't happen
 
2011-12-02 09:58:18 AM
Man, I can't even give naked pictures of myself away, much less have people send them to other people.
 
2011-12-02 09:59:28 AM
Porous Horace: FTFA: "The lawsuit says Dickens could have suspended the male student for being charged with a felony but did not."

Well it's not like he was burping or anything.


Which means there is not yet a zero tolerance rule on text forwards. So they have no idea what to do. If he brought a butter knife in his lunch sack this would be so much easier.
 
2011-12-02 09:59:43 AM
The male student was charged with statutory rape, pleaded guilty to assault and battery, and graduated with his class in 2009.

IANAL, but doesn't this fall under double jeopardy?
 
2011-12-02 10:01:18 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


www.mediaite.com
Soon
 
2011-12-02 10:01:54 AM
Vash's Apprentice: The male student was charged with statutory rape, pleaded guilty to assault and battery, and graduated with his class in 2009.

IANAL, but doesn't this fall under double jeopardy?


What? How would this be double jeopardy? He pleaded guilty to a lesser sentence. Happens often.
 
2011-12-02 10:02:23 AM
Well since he sent her nude pics to everyone he should have gotten in trouble for distributing child porn, as she should have for giving them to him in the first place. So when she was 14 she could have just cut out the useless school admins and gone straight to the cops.
 
2011-12-02 10:02:44 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


emailmigrations.com
 
2011-12-02 10:03:28 AM
at first, I was like attention whore, attention whore.. stupid girl for sending nude photos.

but then it got all rapey and I was like, has a case now..but still stupid for sending nude photos and expecting them to remain private...

/had nude photos of an ex once
//destroyed them after we split
///I still wonder if she is/was fearful that I posted them (wasn't a friendly split)
 
2011-12-02 10:03:35 AM
anybody got the link?
 
2011-12-02 10:03:52 AM
Why isn't the girl in this story being prosecuted for distributing child pornography?
 
2011-12-02 10:04:30 AM
latimesblogs.latimes.com

I got it.
 
2011-12-02 10:07:06 AM
itsfullofstars: [latimesblogs.latimes.com image 385x476]

I got it.


You still seem lost.
 
2011-12-02 10:08:03 AM
"RJ" asked her to send him nude photos. When she did, he "sexted" them via cell phone and on the Internet.

crossfitfire.com
 
2011-12-02 10:10:12 AM
itsfullofstars: Sorry GOP, not yours, cant have:

[clinton4.nara.gov image 413x532]


It's all very obvious. itsfullofstars has just returned from the future where, during the pretrial investigation, the cyberpolice backtraced this girls image and found it on Mitt Romney's computer. Consequences were never the same.
 
2011-12-02 10:10:41 AM
FTA: "When she did, he "sexted" them via cell phone and on the Internet."

"Quick, get me the computer, I need to sext these pictures post haste! Oh, drat! I sexted them too hastily; they're everywhere!"
 
2011-12-02 10:11:50 AM
Yeah, so the girl sends naked pics of herself of her own volition. Gets upset when these photos are circulated by the receiver, who also happens to be related to her. Then gets made fun of for being a dumb biatch, for the voluntary pictures that she took and then subsequently sent out for public viewing.

And somehow this is all the fault of someone else?

/Goddammitsomuch
 
2011-12-02 10:12:26 AM
rubi_con_man: Your children will never know (unless you tell them). It will probably turn your future husband on. No you'll probably never marry a Kennedy, but that's okay you probably weren't going to anyhow. I'd practice getting your game on to meet the awesome rep you're going to have.

It probably does increase your odds of sleeping with one, though.
 
2011-12-02 10:12:55 AM
so sexting = sending naked pics? i thought it meant 'hey baby, i wanna butter your muffin' and stuff like that
 
2011-12-02 10:14:10 AM
Pics or it didn't happen.
 
2011-12-02 10:17:20 AM
Someting something something Dickens Cider something something.
 
2011-12-02 10:17:33 AM
Girl sues school because she send naked pictures to another student and the obvious happened

American children are failing rudimentary English?
 
2011-12-02 10:21:19 AM
Balchinian: Someting something something Dickens Cider something something.

if you're lucky, you can get a dickens cider can.
 
2011-12-02 10:21:49 AM
These pictures undoubtedly wound up on some disgusting web site somewhere.

Which one I don't know but I'm sure it's out there somewhere.

If someone finds it let me know so I can tell people which website needs to be avoided.
 
2011-12-02 10:22:16 AM
Subby might need to sue the school he went to as well.
 
2011-12-02 10:24:19 AM
rubi_con_man: You know what?

If you send a guy naked pictures of yourself just because he asked, Then yes, you're a whore. Or you were at 14.

And that's okay.

Jesus Loved Whores, too. Get over it. It's just your body.

Your children will never know (unless you tell them). It will probably turn your future husband on. No you'll probably never marry a Kennedy, but that's okay you probably weren't going to anyhow. I'd practice getting your game on to meet the awesome rep you're going to have.



Yea, but there's a good chance you will marry into a family of criminals and drunks, close enough.
 
2011-12-02 10:24:20 AM
madcan34: These pictures undoubtedly wound up on some disgusting web site somewhere.

Which one I don't know but I'm sure it's out there somewhere.

If someone finds it let me know so I can tell people which website needs to be avoided.


reminds me of something i saw on reddit.

'my husband scrubs the internet of porn to protect people from having to see that filth. he downloads the pictures from porn sites onto his computer, then deletes them, so they aren't on the internet anymore.'

something like that.
 
2011-12-02 10:24:41 AM
Who wrote that headline, Tarzan?
 
2011-12-02 10:25:24 AM
So, is this the thread were we blame 14year olds for not acting like grown-ups and making stupid decisions?
 
2011-12-02 10:29:14 AM
Yeah, because if the school administration had actively told students "don't share the naked pictures of Susie Snowflake" it would have stopped that right away and wouldn't have increased the distribution of said pictures. You know, because kids always do what the school principal says.


(I do disagree with the decision to let the offender graduate with his class, though)
 
Displayed 50 of 117 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »