If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   A page full of pictures of Victoria Secret models and what they'd look like... you've already stopped reading this haven't you? Won't you be surprised   (fora.mtv.ca) divider line 83
    More: Obvious, Victoria's Secret, candace, Lima, cheekbones  
•       •       •

24283 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Dec 2011 at 9:58 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



83 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-12-02 10:00:18 AM
Adriana is still hot
 
2011-12-02 10:01:33 AM
What if the Grinch Stole Fark? Like subby did.
 
2011-12-02 10:01:47 AM
As imagined by an artist who thinks that all big girls keep it in their necks apparently.
 
2011-12-02 10:02:19 AM
Fat face, sharp clavicle? I'd still do 'em.
 
2011-12-02 10:03:24 AM
"If the Victoria's Secret models gained 100 pounds"

...they'd be 170 pounds?

I'll never know, link seems to be farked already.
 
2011-12-02 10:03:48 AM
...if they were on a page that doesn't open?
 
2011-12-02 10:03:55 AM
Not to go all Studman69, but a lot of the real pictures look kind of creepy. Some of those stomachs seem one step away from being a "starving Ethiopian child distended" stomach.

Or basically a lot of those girls don't have much in the way of hips to give them an hourglass figure, so they compensate by having a creepily lacking midsection.
 
2011-12-02 10:05:01 AM
xalres:
I'll never know, link seems to be farked already.
 
2011-12-02 10:05:50 AM
[I'm okay with this.jpg]

/likes 'em well fed.
 
2011-12-02 10:06:10 AM
Thanks a lot, farkers, you crashed it. Now how am I going to fap?
 
2011-12-02 10:06:14 AM
1.bp.blogspot.com
 
2011-12-02 10:06:19 AM
I'll never know, link seems to be farked already.
 
2011-12-02 10:07:36 AM
100 pounds my ass.

more like 300 pounds.
 
2011-12-02 10:08:03 AM
wooo! 7 mins and already the link is farked!
 
2011-12-02 10:08:46 AM
Link Farked in less than 3 minutes.
WTG, Farkers.
 
2011-12-02 10:09:09 AM
The secret would be let out?
 
2011-12-02 10:09:54 AM
Apparently they are expecting every model to put on 80 of those 100 pounds in the head and neck area. Even for a 100 pound gain, all of those modified head shots put too much weight in the face (looks more like 200+ pounds); plus some of them are really sloppy photoshop work - all but the first two look seriously deformed (especially Chanel Iman)
 
2011-12-02 10:10:13 AM
www.digit-8.com

/also, beware of GIS "sexy 404 error"
//shutter
 
2011-12-02 10:10:17 AM
& there was much rejoicing throughout in internet's Chubbychaser community.
 
2011-12-02 10:10:38 AM
It appears that the "artist" has never actually seen a fat woman. They don't have neck wattles the size and shape of truck intertubes.
 
2011-12-02 10:11:14 AM
What's wrong with full figured women?

Link is still farked for me.
 
2011-12-02 10:11:18 AM
Daunting Cutter: [I'm okay with this.jpg]

/likes 'em well fed.


Me too, but these seemed off... very off...
 
2011-12-02 10:11:57 AM
If they gained 100lbs in their necks.

Faces like that belong to people who weigh over 300lbs.
 
2011-12-02 10:12:36 AM
I managed to get through and view the pictures. I can sum up what I saw with one picture:

c.cslacker.com
 
2011-12-02 10:13:17 AM
ERROR 504: Link is Farked

The page you are looking for has crashed due to an overabundance of clicks from the hoardes of basement dwelling losers at Fark.com hoping to see hot women in their underwear. Please try again later.
 
2011-12-02 10:13:18 AM
cleveoh: & there was much rejoicing throughout in internet's Chubbychaser community.

No. Subby, pulled a double whammy. He got us too, cause those aren't very good shops. Just unsettling.
 
2011-12-02 10:15:42 AM
a tentative, and slightly chubby, bookmark
 
2011-12-02 10:18:13 AM
Arctic Phoenix: What's wrong with full figured women?

Link is still farked for me.
 
2011-12-02 10:19:26 AM
I can't get the link to open, anyone care to post a few of these?
 
2011-12-02 10:19:44 AM
5'9" @ 210# work as a reference point?

Link (SFW) (new window)
 
2011-12-02 10:19:50 AM
I already know what they look like, dammit.

That's what Sears Magazines are for.
 
2011-12-02 10:20:27 AM
linkee no workee for me. (blocked)

what ever happend to Fredricks of Hollywood?

They were oh so much sluttier.

and I mean that in a good way.

Sigh.
 
2011-12-02 10:21:33 AM
100 pounds of mixed fat & muscle, evenly distributed in accordance with most female physiology, on a tall, scrawny runway model would likely result in some sweet, juicy, farm-girl who's soft and wonderful. Depending on DNA, it might result in HUGE tits and luscious round hips, the kind of woman a king would go to war for, once upon a time.

Gay Fashion Designers and Self-Loathing Female Fashion Writers Like Bony Women. Say it.
 
2011-12-02 10:22:29 AM
I know that this whole "article" is tongue in cheek, but still... eeesh.
 
2011-12-02 10:22:42 AM
Savage Belief: ERROR 504: Link is Farked

The page you are looking for has crashed due to an overabundance of clicks from the hoardes of basement dwelling losers at Fark.com hoping to see hot women in their underwear. Please try again later.


Hay I resent that, I was at work trying to see hot women in their underware.
 
2011-12-02 10:23:10 AM
Okay, after seeing the pictures I call BS. That's not 100 lbs, that's 250 at minimum. I don't know ANYBODY who gains weight mainly on their head and necks.

/I can't fap to that
 
2011-12-02 10:23:20 AM
I'm not into bigger girls, but the artist is miles off. My mother is 5'6"ish and maybe 235-50 and even here jowls don't sag like that.
 
2011-12-02 10:25:29 AM
Actually, Fark chubby chasers, Victoria Secret models aren't typically the Paris runway models that look like coat hangers. They're generally more shapely than that.
 
2011-12-02 10:26:23 AM
2 grams: linkee no workee for me. (blocked)

what ever happend to Fredricks of Hollywood?

They were oh so much sluttier.

and I mean that in a good way.

Sigh.


Right on...Back when they didn't airbrush nipples out...now, it's just...sterile...

/Yeah, I know. Pass the pills and applesauce.
 
2011-12-02 10:26:27 AM
images.pictureshunt.com
 
2011-12-02 10:26:43 AM
INeedAName: I'm not into bigger girls, but the artist is miles off. My mother is 5'6"ish and maybe 235-50 and even here jowls don't sag like that.

Pics or you're lying through your teeth.
 
2011-12-02 10:27:11 AM
The photoshop seems to be under the assumption that the women are all 4'4" if he thinks that an extra hundred pounds would add that kind of visual weight to them. Runway models are generally around six feet tall, and a hundred pounds would actually look pretty decent on them.

Here's a picture of a woman who's 5'8 and 200 pounds:

i44.tinypic.com

Not slim but hardly the Staypuft man they photoshopped.
 
2011-12-02 10:29:24 AM
Link is farked. Could someone post the pics?
 
2011-12-02 10:33:51 AM
chzmemebase.files.wordpress.com
 
2011-12-02 10:34:06 AM
I'd be happy just to see what they look like naturally without all the artificial enhancements like makeup, hairdressers, cosmetic surgery, etc.
 
2011-12-02 10:41:19 AM
Fat Erin Heatherton looks like regular Britney Spears.
 
2011-12-02 10:41:48 AM
My second greenlight ever and the link breaks. FML.

(and yeah, they do look like they've gained all 100 pounds in their necks)
 
2011-12-02 10:48:57 AM
I'm not saying I'm ok with girls having meat on their bones and I'm not saying I'm not.

/but I am
 
2011-12-02 10:49:36 AM
Wow link farked already
 
2011-12-02 10:52:50 AM
brandied: Link is farked. Could someone post the pics?

i236.photobucket.com
 
Displayed 50 of 83 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report