If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Contact Music) Obvious Katy Perry udderly angry about divorce rumors   (contactmusic.com) divider line 33
More: Obvious, Katy Perry, Russell Brand, Ex-wife, soap operas  
•       •       •

4826 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 01 Dec 2011 at 12:24 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



33 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
Surly U. Jest
2011-12-01 12:27:32 PM
Don't tell me their marriage will go teats-up?
 
That coward David Lopan
2011-12-01 12:29:14 PM
What a couple of boobs.
 
Descartes
2011-12-01 12:30:33 PM
She should put her best side forward on this one
 
Bagelox-99
2011-12-01 12:32:37 PM
content.thenudeceleb.com
 
LewDux
2011-12-01 12:34:33 PM
Bagelox-99: [content.thenudeceleb.com image 470x455]

If she used intellectual face more often, I'd respect her
 
Apos [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 12:36:27 PM
Again with Katy and her pet gibbon,subby?
 
Wellon Dowd
2011-12-01 12:37:39 PM
She'll milk this for all the publicity she can.
 
GetaLife [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 12:40:09 PM
Descartes: She should put her breast side forward on this one

ftfy
 
italie
2011-12-01 12:46:18 PM
Came for the udders. Leaving sticky.
 
MagSeven
2011-12-01 12:49:22 PM
Heh. I was thinking Subby was calling Katy a cow, then I remembered her bodacious ta-tas.
 
tallguywithglasseson [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 12:52:49 PM
Brand himself has been busy as well of course, pursuing his career in acting with the lukewarmly received 'Hop' and 'Arthur',

Referring to 'Arthur' as "lukewarmly received" is being a bit more than generous.
 
Wellon Dowd
2011-12-01 12:57:02 PM
www.imgbase.net
 
DoBeDoBeDo
2011-12-01 01:00:28 PM
Boobies!

/Not filter pwned
 
GacysBasement
2011-12-01 01:03:40 PM
Vanilla Love Globes
 
dionysos
2011-12-01 01:03:53 PM
Wellon Dowd: [www.imgbase.net image 399x600]

That might be the most relevant Fark handle ever.
 
Farking Canuck
2011-12-01 01:08:30 PM
Thanks for the mammaries!
 
Gunny Highway
2011-12-01 01:11:50 PM
She's purdy
 
peterthx
2011-12-01 01:18:16 PM
tallguywithglasseson: Brand himself has been busy as well of course, pursuing his career in acting with the lukewarmly received 'Hop' and 'Arthur',

Referring to 'Arthur' as "lukewarmly received" is being a bit more than generous.

I actually watched it expecting nothing and it wasn't bad.

affordablehousinginstitute.org

People commenting on things they've actually seen???
 
swaxhog
2011-12-01 01:57:41 PM
I'll be keeping abreast of this situation.
 
peter21
2011-12-01 02:00:09 PM
She appears to be the new host for the Golden Globes.

/Ricky Gervais approves
 
182 [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 02:17:00 PM
Bagelox-99: [content.thenudeceleb.com image 470x455]

dem tittays!
 
ZMugg
2011-12-01 02:18:11 PM
peter21: She appears to be the new host for the Golden Globes.

/Ricky Gervais approves

I'd host her Golden Globes, if you know what I mean.

I think you do.
 
quatchi
2011-12-01 02:38:47 PM
Cool thread.

I dug it.
 
tallguywithglasseson [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 02:38:49 PM
peterthx: I actually watched it expecting nothing and it wasn't bad.

[affordablehousinginstitute.org image 260x300]

People commenting on things they've actually seen???

It has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, 37 from Metacritic, had an estimated budget of 40m and grossed 33m.

Not sure that constitutes a "lukewarm" reception, regardless of your singular opinion of the movie.
 
peter21
2011-12-01 02:39:18 PM
ZMugg: peter21: She appears to be the new host for the Golden Globes.

/Ricky Gervais approves

I'd host her Golden Globes, if you know what I mean.

I think you do.

Do I! And how!
 
Bag of Hammers
2011-12-01 02:41:23 PM
Nobody cares Kathy, TITS OR GTFO
 
peterthx
2011-12-01 03:09:57 PM
tallguywithglasseson: Not sure that constitutes a "lukewarm" reception, regardless of your singular opinion of the movie.

But did you see it?
 
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:16:36 PM
tallguywithglasseson: peterthx: I actually watched it expecting nothing and it wasn't bad.

[affordablehousinginstitute.org image 260x300]

People commenting on things they've actually seen???

It has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, 37 from Metacritic, had an estimated budget of 40m and grossed 33m.

Not sure that constitutes a "lukewarm" reception, regardless of your singular opinion of the movie.

russell brand carries a movie about as well as jonah hill; that is, not at all.
 
tallguywithglasseson [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 03:35:30 PM
peterthx: tallguywithglasseson: Not sure that constitutes a "lukewarm" reception, regardless of your singular opinion of the movie.

But did you see it?

Is that relevant to the film's reception, the subject of my original comment?
 
vrax
2011-12-01 03:45:18 PM
"First I'm pregnant & then I'm divorced. What am I All My Children?!" raged the star...

Raged? Me thinks they read a little too much into the tweeties. The only way I can get any rage out of that quote is if I read it as Lewis Black.
 
peterthx
2011-12-01 05:30:44 PM
tallguywithglasseson:
Is that relevant to the film's reception, the subject of my original comment?

Yes.

Because when you say something is good or stinks at least it's YOUR opinion and not based on something you read somewhere.
 
tallguywithglasseson [TotalFark]
2011-12-01 07:27:32 PM
peterthx: Because when you say something is good or stinks at least it's YOUR opinion and not based on something you read somewhere.

Not sure if you're being obtuse, aren't reading very carefully, or if you're just dim.

I didn't give my opinion of the 'Arthur' remake on its merits.

I commented on its reception. I said it was poorly received, or rather that "lukewarm" was being more than generous.
I posted an aggregate of reviews (critical reception) and box office numbers (financial/popular reception) to back it up. Again your singular opinion does not put much of a dent in that.

So your point about criticizing the merits of a film someone hasn't seen would probably have been better made some other time, when someone was actually doing that.
Though if you were specifically hoping to defend the remake of 'Arthur', I'm guessing that subject will come up very rarely.

Anyway, glad you enjoyed it.
 
peterthx
2011-12-01 08:53:27 PM
tallguywithglasseson: peterthx: Because when you say something is good or stinks at least it's YOUR opinion and not based on something you read somewhere.

Not sure if you're being obtuse, aren't reading very carefully, or if you're just dim.

I didn't give my opinion of the 'Arthur' remake on its merits.

I commented on its reception. I said it was poorly received, or rather that "lukewarm" was being more than generous.
I posted an aggregate of reviews (critical reception) and box office numbers (financial/popular reception) to back it up. Again your singular opinion does not put much of a dent in that.

So your point about criticizing the merits of a film someone hasn't seen would probably have been better made some other time, when someone was actually doing that.
Though if you were specifically hoping to defend the remake of 'Arthur', I'm guessing that subject will come up very rarely.

Anyway, glad you enjoyed it.

If you want to get really technical I was commenting on FARK posters in general making good/bad statements about things they've never seen for themselves.

/hence the "inconceivable!"
 
Displayed 33 of 33 comments

Redisplay/refresh comments

This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
From the Fark Shop:
More from the Fark Shop »