It's Not News It's Fark.com
Real news. Real funny
Log In
|
Sign Up »
Login
Password
Forgot password?
X
Fark
TotalFark
my
Fark
About/FArQ
Contests
Store
Contact Us
Mobile
Search:
Password
Login
Turn on javascript (or enable it for Fark) for a better user experience.
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Main
Sports
Business
Geek
Entertainment
Politics
Video
(Some Guy)
The Muppets has a 98% approval rating on Rotton Tomatoes, a rare 'A' CinemaScore rating and is one of the best movies of the year. So does it have a chance at the Oscars? The answer is 'probably not, except for the songs'
(
thewrap.com
)
84
More:
Interesting
• • •
1679
clicks; posted to
Entertainment »
on
01 Dec 2011
at
2:24 PM
|
Favorite
| share:
more»
|
shirt it!
Share this link:
URL:
http://fk.cm/go/6778662
Bookmark:
URL:
http://fk.cm/6778662
Bookmark:
Article
Comments
close
84 Comments
(
+0 »
)
Paginated (50/page)
Single page
Single page, reversed
Normal view
Change images to links
Show raw HTML
Show posts from ignored users
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
FirstNationalBastard
2011-12-01 02:18:25 PM
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
/Oscar voters are the ultimate hipsters.
ConConHead
2011-12-01 02:27:55 PM
I'd give it the same chances that South Park: Bigger, Longer Uncut had for best songs and Jim Carrey had for Truman Show.
Fano
2011-12-01 02:30:12 PM
FirstNationalBastard
:
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
/Oscar voters are the ultimate hipsters.
It's a shame they didn't make a biopic about a retarded gay man during the Holocaust this year. One that had him struggle to put on a play and teach people the value of joy through acting. Because that would have won.
WayToBlue
2011-12-01 02:30:54 PM
The ads for this looked absolutely terrible but I'm happy to hear it is apparently good.
blakeosage
2011-12-01 02:31:18 PM
I saw this movie last weekend, and I wasn't all that impressed.
The humor seemed forced to me, and the "pay off" of Walter's talent was just dumb.
I guess I was hoping that they would cater this movie more towards those of us that grew up with the Muppets, but I guess they were going for the middle of the road to where it would cater to those that grew up with them, and kids these days.
/damn kids these days.
//my lawn, off it.
DanZero
2011-12-01 02:33:26 PM
WHY U NO USE
katghoti
2011-12-01 02:35:50 PM
What is it with people hating on the muppets? It's like they have a fist up their own ass.
Animal and Beker for the win!
AiryAnne
2011-12-01 02:36:38 PM
What's a muppet?
(new window)
WayToBlue
2011-12-01 02:37:54 PM
FirstNationalBastard
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So,
whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
96 - The English Patient
97 - Titanic
98 - Shakespeare in Love
99 - American Beauty
00 - Gladiator
01 - Beautiful Mind
02 - Chicago
03 - LOTR: Return of the King
04 - Million Dollar Baby
05 - Crash
06 - The Departed
07 - No Country for Old Men
08 - Slumdog Millionaire
09 - The Hurt Locker
10 - The King's Speech
Every one of these films was huge before it won. Is there seriously one on here you hadn't heard of at the time?
cscanlon7
2011-12-01 02:38:56 PM
FirstNationalBastard
:
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
/Oscar voters are the ultimate hipsters.
ConConHead
:
I'd give it the same chances that South Park: Bigger, Longer Uncut had for best songs and Jim Carrey had for Truman Show.
Jonathan Hohensee
2011-12-01 02:39:27 PM
It's a charming movie, but I wouldn't call it Oscar-worthy.
Zik-Zak
2011-12-01 02:39:46 PM
FirstNationalBastard
:
/Oscar voters are the ultimate hipsters.
I've felt that way ever since 'The English Patient' won.
/you've probably never heard of it
//but it beat "Shine"? WTF!?!?
Uzzah
2011-12-01 02:41:41 PM
FirstNationalBastard
:
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
If you were to deem the film that made the most money to be the "Best Picture" of the year, what's the point in having an award? Just post the box office figures and you're done.
Practical_Draconian
2011-12-01 02:42:26 PM
I kept expecting Jason Segel to show his muppet again.
tlchwi02
2011-12-01 02:43:02 PM
i'm not sure purely being enjoyable is necessarily criteria for winning the oscars.
although you almost have to say it might be worth it just for the pure shock of resurrecting a languishing former entertainment giant and making everyone at least pleased with it.
SassyMcSassalot
2011-12-01 02:43:27 PM
blakeosage
:
I saw this movie last weekend, and I wasn't all that impressed.
The humor seemed forced to me, and the "pay off" of Walter's talent was just dumb.
I guess I was hoping that they would cater this movie more towards those of us that grew up with the Muppets, but I guess they were going for the middle of the road to where it would cater to those that grew up with them, and kids these days.
/damn kids these days.
//my lawn, off it.
Never thought of using the This thing before, but This. It's just not that good. It was nostalgic for me, but my 7 year old was pretty bored with it.
AntonChigger
2011-12-01 02:46:50 PM
Uzzah
:
FirstNationalBastard: In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
If you were to deem the film that made the most money to be the "Best Picture" of the year, what's the point in having an award? Just post the box office figures and you're done.
Where exactly did he say that the film most people enjoy is also the one that makes the most money? They don't have to be synonymous.
realmolo
2011-12-01 02:46:52 PM
I saw the movie. It was pretty weak, honestly. This whole "The Muppets Are Back!" thing is just hype.
"The Muppets" are still Disney-ized. It's just that now they are also Pixar-ized. They'll never be "Henson-ized" again, and that is the problem. Henson's Muppets were too weird, and Disney doesn't want to do that, even though that was the WHOLE POINT of "The Muppets" in the first place.
Eirik
2011-12-01 02:47:48 PM
Fano
:
It's a shame they didn't make a biopic about a retarded gay man during the Holocaust this year. One that had him struggle to put on a play and teach people the value of joy through acting. Because that would have won.
I'd snark, but I think we all know that it would win. It could be Mel Gibsons comeback movie.
akula
2011-12-01 02:53:24 PM
realmolo
:
I saw the movie. It was pretty weak, honestly. This whole "The Muppets Are Back!" thing is just hype.
Disagree.
Remember what the Muppets ARE. They aren't about spectacle or thrills. They aren't even about plot. They're about optimism, friendship, and a belief that when you join with others and get to work absolutely anything can be accomplished. They're about laughing and having a good time without having to laugh AT somebody (they sure as hell aren't about the modern trend toward embarrassment based humor); while they are caricatures of us, they also can represent the best of us.
I thought The Muppets was great; it had everything I expected a Muppet movie to have, and even the premise of this one worked for me. The Muppets depend on a world where humans and muppets live side by side and that's perfectly normal (just like every other Muppet-centric show or movie), and I can easily see how after a wild ride of success a group could just drift apart (some to further success, most to being forgotten). It all came back together perfectly.
I can easily see why the Academy won't award it for much of anything of significance, but it was a great movie- not the deepest, not the most profound, but charming, funny, and uplifting.
I can only hope this means the Muppets are back... good God, we need them to be back- we need some lighthearted and optimistic fun right now in the worst farking way.
12349876
2011-12-01 02:55:31 PM
This just in: critics and experts have a different perspective from John and Jane Normal.
SassyMcSassalot
2011-12-01 02:59:14 PM
akula
:
realmolo: I saw the movie. It was pretty weak, honestly. This whole "The Muppets Are Back!" thing is just hype.
Disagree.
Remember what the Muppets ARE. They aren't about spectacle or thrills. They aren't even about plot. They're about optimism, friendship, and a belief that when you join with others and get to work absolutely anything can be accomplished. They're about laughing and having a good time without having to laugh AT somebody (they sure as hell aren't about the modern trend toward embarrassment based humor); while they are caricatures of us, they also can represent the best of us.
Begs to differ.
/hot like Miss Piggy
Fano
2011-12-01 03:01:13 PM
Eirik
:
Fano: It's a shame they didn't make a biopic about a retarded gay man during the Holocaust this year. One that had him struggle to put on a play and teach people the value of joy through acting. Because that would have won.
I'd snark, but I think we all know that it would win. It could be Mel Gibsons comeback movie.
Perhaps Mel could remake The Day the Clown Cried. With the right hands, it could be daring enough to be Oscar bait.
taxandspend
2011-12-01 03:01:38 PM
WayToBlue
:
FirstNationalBastard
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
96 - The English Patient
97 - Titanic
98 - Shakespeare in Love
99 - American Beauty
00 - Gladiator
01 - Beautiful Mind
02 - Chicago
03 - LOTR: Return of the King
04 - Million Dollar Baby
05 - Crash
06 - The Departed
07 - No Country for Old Men
08 - Slumdog Millionaire
09 - The Hurt Locker
10 - The King's Speech
Every one of these films was huge before it won. Is there seriously one on here you hadn't heard of at the time?
To be fair, The Hurt Locker is one of the lowest grossing winners ever. Not a huge film in theaters.
GoHomeAndGetYourShinebox
2011-12-01 03:10:29 PM
I'm sure The Muppets is a fun film, and that belief will be either confirmed or denied when a high-quality pirated copy is available online, but, let's face it, we love the Muppets for nostalgia as much as anything. Jim Henson created an amazing world of puppets, and it is nice to see that the world can live on today after his passing and still retain some of his old magic.
But it is not Oscar-worthy.
I'm sorry to burst the bubbles of all of you basement dwellers who read comic books and think that they are great works of literature, but nothing can make a Muppet movie worthy of Best Picture at the Oscars. They are fun, but they lack depth and significance. Same reason your beloved superhero flicks don't win Best Picture.
Rotten Tomatoes scores don't mean shiat. Among those 98% of critics that gave it a "fresh tomato", few if any will declare it best film of the year.
And as much as most of us here complain about the remakes, sequels and overall dumbing down of American cinema, you would not be doing American cinema any favors by recommending this to achieve top honors.
bukketmaster
2011-12-01 03:13:02 PM
GoHomeAndGetYourShinebox
:
Rotten Tomatoes scores don't mean shiat.
.
Didn't you read the headline? We're talking about
Rotton
tomatoes.
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:14:10 PM
96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
wiredmaverick
2011-12-01 03:16:31 PM
FirstNationalBastard
:
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
/Oscar voters are the ultimate hipsters.
Those awards exist. They're called the MTV Movie awards. The new Twilight swept them this year, so they're probably right up your alley.
Anyway, this year sucked for films. I'm guessing they give it to the Descendants by default (I haven't seen it).
Movies I've loved this year:
13 Assasins
Drive
Tucker & Dale vs. Evil
Movies that I enjoyed:
Martha Marcy May Marlene
X-Men First Class
Midnight in Paris
Insidious
Hanna
Tree of Life
Super
akula
2011-12-01 03:18:53 PM
GoHomeAndGetYourShinebox
:
nothing can make a Muppet movie worthy of Best Picture at the Oscars. They are fun, but they lack depth and significance
WayToBlue
:
96 - The English Patient
97 - Titanic
98 - Shakespeare in Love
99 - American Beauty
00 - Gladiator
01 - Beautiful Mind
02 - Chicago
03 - LOTR: Return of the King
04 - Million Dollar Baby
05 - Crash
06 - The Departed
07 - No Country for Old Men
08 - Slumdog Millionaire
09 - The Hurt Locker
10 - The King's Speech
Yeah, Titanic, American Beauty, and Gladiator were really deep movies full of significance, exploring and defining the human condition in ways that left us all richer.
I get it, the Academy is looking for what they consider to be deep and meaningful, but the simple fact is that very often what they consider to be deep and meaningful is bullshiat. It's only deep and meaningful if you're stoned at the time. You can tap a reservoir of emotions without the film itself being actually meaningful; Pixar has done that more than once without getting a Best Picture award.
Part of what makes the Oscars complete and utter BS is that the people think they're being meaningful. Sometimes a film can be actual art, but the real purpose for the vast majority of them is nothing more than entertainment. It's self important rich folk sucking each others' dicks for a few hours while they pretend they actually made an impact in the world.
Hell, even Muppets Tonight had more to offer.
You're the jerk... jerk
2011-12-01 03:19:08 PM
frepnog
:
96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, you suck at watching films.
ajt167
2011-12-01 03:25:41 PM
WayToBlue
:
FirstNationalBastard
In the last 15 years or so, the Oscar people usually enjoy giving the best picture award to the wanky, pretentious film instead of the one that the people enjoy and deserves the award.
So, whichever film you've never heard of is the one that will win.
96 - The English Patient - didn't hear of it, didn't see it
97 - Titanic - I'm a dude
98 - Shakespeare in Love - didn't hear of it, didn't see it
99 - American Beauty - not bad
00 - Gladiator - never saw it, heard it was good
01 - Beautiful Mind - good movie
02 - Chicago - again, I'm a dude
03 - LOTR: Return of the King - hell yeah
04 - Million Dollar Baby - I have no desire to see this
05 - Crash - didn't hear of it, didn't see it
06 - The Departed - good movie
07 - No Country for Old Men - good movie
08 - Slumdog Millionaire - didn't hear of it, saw it and liked it
09 - The Hurt Locker - didn't hear of it, didn't see it
10 - The King's Speech - didn't hear of it, didn't see it
Every one of these films was huge before it won. Is there seriously one on here you hadn't heard of at the time?
I didn't hear of several until they won. Maybe I need to watch more TV.
blakeosage
2011-12-01 03:34:16 PM
frepnog
:
96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, really? Out of all those movies, that one is the best in my opinion.
I gotta go with You're the jerk... jerk on this one, "you suck at watching films".
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:35:13 PM
You're the jerk... jerk
:
frepnog: 96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, you suck at watching films.
meh, i guess that maybe be true. just my opinions. my opinions seem to be pretty in synch with what most people i know liked, tho. sometimes a turd is just a turd. i mean, come on. chicago was up against some good films; "Gangs of New York," "The Hours," "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers," "The Pianist". and Chicago won? farking really? a musical suck fest that is mostly forgotten at this point?
Carth
2011-12-01 03:36:01 PM
akula
:
h
Yeah, Titanic, American Beauty, and Gladiator were really deep movies full of significance, exploring and defining the human condition in ways that left us all richer.
.
Titanic won because it showed a 200 million dollar film could be profitable and was a technical masterpiece. American Beauty was wonderfully acted and is still studied by critics and film classes for its portrayal on sexuality and conformity. Gladiator won because it was a weak year and Soderbergh got best director.
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:36:55 PM
blakeosage
:
frepnog: 96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, really? Out of all those movies, that one is the best in my opinion.
I gotta go with You're the jerk... jerk on this one, "you suck at watching films".
you are entitled to your opinion of course... but dude, "the king's speech" is a goddamn bore fest. there is just no good way around it.
Carth
2011-12-01 03:37:48 PM
frepnog
:
Wow, you suck at watching films.
meh, i guess that maybe be true. just my opinions. my opinions seem to be pretty in synch with what most people i know liked, tho. sometimes a turd is just a turd. i mean, come on. chicago was up against some good films; "Gangs of New York," "The Hours," "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers," "The Pianist". and Chicago won? farking really? a musical suck fest that is mostly forgotten at this point?
Your opinion is more in line with Armond White than Rotten Tomatoes.
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:38:01 PM
Carth
:
akula: h
Yeah, Titanic, American Beauty, and Gladiator were really deep movies full of significance, exploring and defining the human condition in ways that left us all richer.
.
Titanic won because it showed a 200 million dollar film could be profitable and was a technical masterpiece. American Beauty was wonderfully acted and is still studied by critics and film classes for its portrayal on sexuality and conformity.
Gladiator won because it was a weak year and Soderbergh got best director.
i take it you were NOT entertained.
/love gladiator.
redpanda2
2011-12-01 03:40:04 PM
I loved the muppets, but it had too many flaws to many flaws to win anything. There were too many manufactured moments of crisis and too much time doing the blues brothers "getting the band back together" kind of thing. There also wasn't very strong motivation from the muppets to save the theater when they had abandoned it in the first place when they got bored with it, and having the actual resolution to the movie run over the credits is just a cop out.
But it was fun, and I hope they do more.
MoronLessOff
2011-12-01 03:40:39 PM
You're the jerk... jerk
:
frepnog: 96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, you suck at watching films.
No, it's just Armond White's fark handle.
Carth
2011-12-01 03:41:20 PM
frepnog
:
Carth: akula: h
Yeah, Titanic, American Beauty, and Gladiator were really deep movies full of significance, exploring and defining the human condition in ways that left us all richer.
.
Titanic won because it showed a 200 million dollar film could be profitable and was a technical masterpiece. American Beauty was wonderfully acted and is still studied by critics and film classes for its portrayal on sexuality and conformity. Gladiator won because it was a weak year and Soderbergh got best director.
i take it you were NOT entertained.
/love gladiator.
No I thought it was a great movie. It wasn't anything too special but it was fun and entertaining.
frepnog
2011-12-01 03:45:37 PM
MoronLessOff
:
You're the jerk... jerk: frepnog: 96 - The English Patient (terrible movie.)
97 - Titanic (equally terrible. sorry, james.)
98 - Shakespeare in Love (meh.)
99 - American Beauty (ok, this was ok.)
00 - Gladiator (this was great)
01 - Beautiful Mind (this was ok)
02 - Chicago (this was a farking travesty of a film.)
03 - LOTR: Return of the King (a payola.)
04 - Million Dollar Baby (piece of shiat)
05 - Crash (double shiat)
06 - The Departed (meh)
07 - No Country for Old Men (overrated piece of shiat)
08 - Slumdog Millionaire (not bad, not great)
09 - The Hurt Locker (piece of shiat)
10 - The King's Speech (so bad they had to create an edited version and STILL no one cared)
Wow, you suck at watching films.
No, it's just Armond White's fark handle.
nope, i am just an asshole.
/actually, i generally like movies that entertain. most of the oscar winners did not entertain me, and did not entertain most normal people i know. having said that, i personally feel that Robocop is the best film ever made, Coming to America is the best comedy ever made that isn't the South Park movie, and there will never be a horror movie that tops the Exorcist. meh.
peterthx
2011-12-01 03:49:01 PM
frepnog
:
i take it you were NOT entertained.
/love gladiator.
Gladiator
was overrated and sometimes pretty boring.
/yeah I said it, and I agree you suck in watching films
mark.jms
2011-12-01 03:52:27 PM
blakeosage
:
I saw this movie last weekend, and I wasn't all that impressed.
The humor seemed forced to me, and the "pay off" of Walter's talent was just dumb.
//my lawn, off it.
No, you get off *my* lawn.
Walter's payoff performance was vintage Muppet Show - some random classical piece, performed in an offbeat way.
That's the part that sells the movie - the part that tells the kids that grew up on it, Yes, we watched it too.
I know all my classical bits from the Muppets and Looney Tunes.
ajt167
2011-12-01 03:58:55 PM
mark.jms
:
blakeosage: I saw this movie last weekend, and I wasn't all that impressed.
The humor seemed forced to me, and the "pay off" of Walter's talent was just dumb.
//my lawn, off it.
No, you get off *my* lawn.
Walter's payoff performance was vintage Muppet Show - some random classical piece, performed in an offbeat way.
That's the part that sells the movie - the part that tells the kids that grew up on it, Yes, we watched it too.
I know all my classical bits from the Muppets and Looney Tunes.
Kill the wabbit...
/Also, Hungarian Rhapsody is the song that got me into classical music.
taxandspend
2011-12-01 04:01:32 PM
It probably will be nominated for songs. I'm sure Man or Muppet is a great song, but I couldn't hear the lyrics because I was laughing too damned hard.
Six_By_Nine
2011-12-01 04:04:55 PM
blakeosage
:
I saw this movie last weekend, and I wasn't all that impressed.
The humor seemed forced to me, and the "pay off" of Walter's talent was just dumb.
I guess I was hoping that they would cater this movie more towards those of us that grew up with the Muppets, but I guess they were going for the middle of the road to where it would cater to those that grew up with them, and kids these days.
/damn kids these days.
//my lawn, off it.
THANK YOU. I didn't think I could have possibly been the only one who thought this.
And seriously? Walter is the biggest Mary Sue this side of Bella Swan.
/Sorry, but the songs sucked too.
/'Man or Muppet'? Painful
//'Me Party'? Awful
///Chris Cooper rapping? Terrible (and why did it need subtitles?)
////The other two original songs? Forgettable
akula
:
They aren't even about plot.
Which would have been nice if the plot actually included them. The Muppets were there more for their own "Remember me?" (or "Remember this?" in the case of The Rainbow Connection) moments rather than being part of the story.
WhoIsWillo
2011-12-01 04:11:36 PM
Wow, Statler and Waldorf have a lot of Fark alts.
moothemagiccow
2011-12-01 04:19:23 PM
Has anyone who writes about what deserves Oscars ever actually watched the show or looked at the list of winners?
Sir Roderick Glossop
2011-12-01 04:25:45 PM
WayToBlue
:
The ads for this looked absolutely terrible but I'm happy to hear it is apparently good.
That movie sucked. Hard.
When you get rid of all the original writing and performing talent, at some point the Muppets just become sock puppets with familiar faces.
I want to punch Jason Segal in his fat, unfunny face for wasting my money and pissing on the corpse of Nick Andopolis.
Sir Roderick Glossop
2011-12-01 04:31:37 PM
Six_By_Nine
:
blakeosage
I'm so glad that there are some other people to validate this perspective. I'm open to the criticism that I "suck at watching movies" but the theater I was in was as laugh-free as if they were showing Shindler's List.
/Fart jokes?
//And that little pissrag Walter was clearly a stand-in for Segal so his self-regard for heroically "saving the Muppets" would be slightly less transparent.
Displayed
50
of
84
comments
First
|
«
|
1
|
2
|
»
|
Last
|
Show all
View Voting Results:
Smartest
and
Funniest
Redisplay/refresh comments
This thread is closed to new comments.
Submit a Link »
Like Fark!
+1 Fark!
Follow @fark on Twitter
Entertainment via RSS
Top Links
Top Comments
Top Submitters
Press/Publicity
Headlines of the Week
All Latest
Fark Forum
Link Voting
Sports Forum
Fark Blogs
Geek Forum
Fark Book
Entertainment Forum
Fark Travel Guide
Politics Forum
Fark Parties
Fark Party Forum
Fark Chat
Photoshop Forum
PS/Photo Browser
Farktography Forum
Fark Quiz
From the
Fark Shop
:
International Hindenburg Re-enactment Society
Emergency Underpants
Yoda Monster Mash-Ups Bobblehead
Yoda Large Carry-All
More from the
Fark Shop
»
Stories from our partner sites:
5 Movie Roles Will Smith (Probably) N...
Katy Perry Seems Surprisingly Cool Ab...
The GIFs That Keep on Giving
11 Bizarre Gadgets You Don't Want You...
More news at Scribol »
Ageless Andie MacDowell Dazzles On Th...
Nicole Kidman Is Ravishing In Red And...
Kristen Stewart Takes The Plunge In A...
Jennifer Love Hewitt Flaunts Her Curv...
More news at Starpulse »
Brush Fire Burning near Lake Mathews
Rowboat Split in Half in Marina Colli...
2 Men Sought in Deadly South LA Barbe...
1 Killed, 3 Hurt in Crash Involving S...
More news at KTLA »
When Hollywood Runs Out of Books to T...
The 12 Best Moments from Mexico's Lea...
5 Infuriating Things Nobody Tells You...
The 5 Weirdest Things You Learn When...
More news at Cracked »