Since when is Judicial Watch non-partisan?

Is this the hope and change you were looking for?

If we are not invading Mexico or sending our troops to die, I am really not getting too upset about this.

AdolfOliverPanties: If we are not invading Mexico or sending our troops to die, I am really not getting too upset about this.

THIS

Preventing a portion of the public from becoming a mass of angry vigilantes attacking brown people because of a murder at the border is a part of being a leader.

How many billions did this action put in Halliburton's bank accounts? How many lies were told to provoke a war with a country which wasn't a threat to us? How did the president, his friends and family profit from this 'coverup'?

None? Gee, why am I not interested?

Obama could almost guarantee victory in 2012 by throwing Holder under a bus.

/I'll drive.

James!: Since when is Judicial Watch non-partisan?

Ever since they said so the first couple of thousand times. Seriously.

2wolves: James!: Since when is Judicial Watch non-partisan?

Ever since they said so the first couple of thousand times. Seriously.

Ah, the "we say so" school of reality.

James!: Since when is Judicial Watch non-partisan?

Since they also went after Bush, Cheney, Delay, and Haliburton?

Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Shhhh... you are hampering the liberals distraction technique. Don't let reality get in the way.

TFA keeps mentioning Border Patrol agents getting fired for stuff, then equates this to Holder getting fired.

When did DoJ assume control of the Border Patrol?

cmunic8r99: TFA keeps mentioning Border Patrol agents getting fired for stuff, then equates this to Holder getting fired.

When did DoJ assume control of the Border Patrol?

When did it lose it? US Customs and Border patrol is a federal civilian law enforcement agency

dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Ah, the very concerned citizen.

If this was 2006, Fark would be a near panic over the evil George Bush. But it's Obama, so it's no big deal.

dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Telling what?

James!: dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Telling what?

That the Obama administration is quite capable of operating in secret. Isn't that bad enough? Who knows what else is going on.

BravadoGT: James!: Since when is Judicial Watch non-partisan?

Since they also went after Bush, Cheney, Delay, and Haliburton?

Not that it matters a hell of a whole lot, but this is how Judicial Watch describes themselves: "Judicial Watch, Inc., a conservative, non-partisan educational foundation, promotes transparency, accountability and integrity in government, politics and the law."

GaryPDX: James!: dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Telling what?

That the Obama administration is quite capable of operating in secret. Isn't that bad enough? Who knows what else is going on.

Ha. Yes, we need an administration that can't keep secrets.

James!: GaryPDX: James!: dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Telling what?

That the Obama administration is quite capable of operating in secret. Isn't that bad enough? Who knows what else is going on.

Ha. Yes, we need an administration that can't keep secrets.

Dude, this is all political. We already know most of the story. The only reason to hide the rest of the story is to hide political scandal, or worse, actual law breaking.

If this was 2006 and it was Bush, liberals from every dark crevice in America would be screaming bloody murder. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

BravadoGT: cmunic8r99: TFA keeps mentioning Border Patrol agents getting fired for stuff, then equates this to Holder getting fired.

When did DoJ assume control of the Border Patrol?

When did it lose it? US Customs and Border patrol is a federal civilian law enforcement agency

March 1, 2003, when the Department of Homeland Security was created.

My point is this: Politicians are corrupt by their very nature, by the very fact that they decided to enter politics. The greed, dishonesty and avarice is part and parcel of the life of a politician. They are all crooked to some degree. If you haven't accepted that, as shiatty a fact as it is, then you are being woefully naive.

So when something like this happens, I am hit with a "who gives a rat's ass" emotion, as I have been with Solyndra and pretty much every Obama "scandal" that has hit the news. In the grand scheme of things, this is small potatoes.

I am far more bothered by the God damned no-string-attached bailouts of Wall Street and by Obama being in the pocket of big money then I am by tiny little scandals like this. IF he gets us into a bullshiat war and empties the farking treasury doing it, I will scream like I did against his predecessor.

It sucks that I am this desensitized to everyday dust-ups, and I wish it was different, but that is the way it is.

GaryPDX: James!: GaryPDX: James!: dj_bigbird: Does it matter if Judicial Watch is partisan or not? The fact that the Obama administration is sealing these records is very, very telling.

Telling what?

That the Obama administration is quite capable of operating in secret. Isn't that bad enough? Who knows what else is going on.

Ha. Yes, we need an administration that can't keep secrets.

Dude, this is all political. We already know most of the story. The only reason to hide the rest of the story is to hide political scandal, or worse, actual law breaking.

If this was 2006 and it was Bush, liberals from every dark crevice in America would be screaming bloody murder. Sunshine is the best disinfectant.

Yes, the ONLY reasons are those. No other reasons at all, ever. I think your elephant hat is on to tight.

cmunic8r99: BravadoGT: cmunic8r99: TFA keeps mentioning Border Patrol agents getting fired for stuff, then equates this to Holder getting fired.

When did DoJ assume control of the Border Patrol?

When did it lose it? US Customs and Border patrol is a federal civilian law enforcement agency

March 1, 2003, when the Department of Homeland Security was created.

Completely forgot about when they reorganized into ICE--tx!

James!: I think your elephant hat is on to tight.

Your donkey hat is loose and blinding you.

GaryPDX: James!: I think your elephant hat is on to tight.

Your donkey hat is loose and blinding you.

If you seriously think there is a crime here go make a citizens arrest. Write your congressperson. Clearly there is no other possible reason for these records to be sealed. It's your smoking gun. RUN GARY! SAVE AMERICA!

Lookie here. The same guy that defends Sandusky's actions is defending Fast and Furious. Amazing how low someone can go just to troll.

R.A.Danny: Lookie here. The same guy that defends Sandusky's actions is defending Fast and Furious. Amazing how low someone can go just to troll.

Who?

BillCo: Is this the hope and change you were looking for?

If Conservatives concede that guns cause murders, I will gladly concede that the actions of the Justice Department lead to this officer's death.

James!: R.A.Danny: Lookie here. The same guy that defends Sandusky's actions is defending Fast and Furious. Amazing how low someone can go just to troll.

Who?

Pretty sure that's referring to me, though I don't believe I'm defending anything. I've gotten a lot of people angry at me lately for insisting we not try people in the media.

mrshowrules: BillCo: Is this the hope and change you were looking for?

If Conservatives concede that guns cause murders, I will gladly concede that the actions of the Justice Department lead to this officer's death.

Do you think guns load, point, and fire themselves?


Obama is engaging in a political cover up here. I hope it doesn't work and he pays a price for his actions. I doubt he will.

MeinRS6: Obama is engaging in a political cover up here

Baseless.

SoCalSurfer: Can we get back to invading mexico for the tequilla and beaches?

We have plenty of tequila and beaches.

SoCalSurfer: James!: SoCalSurfer: Can we get back to invading mexico for the tequilla and beaches?

We have plenty of tequila and beaches.

Yeah, but if we had more there would be less people on each beach.

Also, less zonies

I don't know what a "zonie" is so I'm going to assume it's some kind of gang slang. Also I know a pretty empty beach in Laguna that I like to hang out at. You've just got to know where to go.

James!: MeinRS6: Obama is engaging in a political cover up here

Baseless.

Actually, it's obvious.

MeinRS6: mrshowrules: BillCo: Is this the hope and change you were looking for?

If Conservatives concede that guns cause murders, I will gladly concede that the actions of the Justice Department lead to this officer's death.

Do you think guns load, point, and fire themselves?


Obama is engaging in a political cover up here. I hope it doesn't work and he pays a price for his actions. I doubt he will.

You can't have it both ways. You can't say guns don't cause murders and the Justice Department covered up a murder caused by a gun.

What cover-up? What's the cover-up all about? Allowing guns to get in the hands of criminals. Red necks do that everyday in the parking lots of gun shows. What's the big deal if you think gun control is stupid?

Personally, I think the JD farked up royally and everyone who allowed this to happen should be fired. If Obama was aware of it and did nothing to stop it, he should be impeached. Of course, my position is completely consistent with how dangerous I think guns are and the need for very tight gun controls. It is just funny to see the mental gymnastics of Conservatives who so desperately want to hang the JD on this while not conceding that access to this weapon could very well have caused this murder of an officer.

MeinRS6: James!: MeinRS6: Obama is engaging in a political cover up here

Baseless.

Actually, it's obvious.

Is not.

mrshowrules: You can't have it both ways. You can't say guns don't cause murders and the Justice Department covered up a murder caused by a gun.

Sure you can, especially when what you're covering up is your backdoor scheme to vilify law abiding gun shops.

Post 9/11 world!!1! Wartime President!!1! Old Europe!!1!