If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(BBC) Ironic Retired Seattle police chief Norm Stamper - who led the 1999 WTO Battle for Seattle - says that police responses to the Occupy protests is too heavy handed, blames the militarization of local police by Homeland Security   (bbc.co.uk) divider line 105
More: Ironic, Chief Stamper, WTO, militarization, Combat stress reaction, Seattle, chess tactics, Occupy Wall Street  
•       •       •

2533 clicks; posted to Main » on 29 Nov 2011 at 11:40 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



105 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-29 10:45:50 AM
"is = are"

There, in before the grammar nazis

/subby
/I got hassled by Seattle cops once myself, but I deserved it at the time
 
2011-11-29 11:41:53 AM
Welcome to the new United States of Occupied Amerika.


/Where are your papers, citizen?
 
2011-11-29 11:42:01 AM
Norm Stamper - wasn't he a character in Ken Kesey's "Sometimes a Great Notion"?
 
2011-11-29 11:42:14 AM
Police officer critiquing other police officers does not equal ironic. Just interesting.
 
2011-11-29 11:44:00 AM
A TruthSpeaker! Seize him!
 
2011-11-29 11:46:28 AM
They need to stick with Stamper, yah!

i307.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-29 11:46:47 AM
So, ignoring the laws and pandering to dirty lazy dip shiats is heavy handed?
 
2011-11-29 11:50:47 AM
Well yeah.
 
2011-11-29 11:51:03 AM
Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years
 
2011-11-29 11:52:35 AM
Voiceofreason01: Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years

True, but it's been accelerating since the DHS sugardaddy got involved.
 
2011-11-29 11:52:45 AM
Voiceofreason01: Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years

I'd say not really, it was one thing to have a swat team in a major city but now it seems we keep getting reports of smaller towns having swat teams
 
2011-11-29 11:52:57 AM
Joe Blowme: So, ignoring the laws and pandering to dirty lazy dip shiats is heavy handed?

Eh, 1/10. I'm sure you'll get a bite.
 
2011-11-29 11:52:58 AM
A friend of mine went down to Seattle during the WTO protests just as it was turning into the "Battle in Seattle". He just meant to get some pictures. He ended up getting tear-gassed.

He also had a tablespoon of The Man at Dixie's.

He's kind of a moron. He works for Apple now. It kind of figures.
 
2011-11-29 11:53:17 AM
Voiceofreason01: Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years

1972?
 
2011-11-29 11:53:53 AM
Somebody needs to check on how well Norm Stamper 'handled' those protests before pointing to him as an 'Expert' on the subject.
 
2011-11-29 11:54:12 AM
InOmnibusCaritas: Police officer critiquing other police officers does not equal ironic. Just interesting.

In the "Alanis Morissette" definition, no, but in the classic dictionary definition "Happening in the opposite way to what is expected, thus typically causing wry amusement" then yes, this may actually be ironic. It's like 10,000 police chiefs telling you you're too heavy handed when all you need is a Fox Newser in a skirt.
 
2011-11-29 11:55:15 AM
Joe Blowme: So, ignoring the laws and pandering to dirty lazy dip shiats is heavy handed?

Well if the cops would rather shoot tear gas bombs then try other tactics, you could call them lazy.

/yes I know
//
///
\\\\something witty should go somewhere but I'm feeling lazy
 
2011-11-29 11:56:04 AM
MFAWG: Somebody needs to check on how well Norm Stamper 'handled' those protests before pointing to him as an 'Expert' on the subject.

Did you read all of the article?
 
2011-11-29 11:58:03 AM
MFAWG
Somebody needs to check on how well Norm Stamper 'handled' those protests before pointing to him as an 'Expert' on the subject.

Since then Stamper has said publicly and repeatedly that he was wrong.
 
2011-11-29 12:00:28 PM
patrick767: MFAWG
Somebody needs to check on how well Norm Stamper 'handled' those protests before pointing to him as an 'Expert' on the subject.

Since then Stamper has said publicly and repeatedly that he was wrong.


Faint solace to those whose lives he took that week.
 
2011-11-29 12:00:50 PM
Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.
 
2011-11-29 12:01:51 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: patrick767: MFAWG
Somebody needs to check on how well Norm Stamper 'handled' those protests before pointing to him as an 'Expert' on the subject.

Since then Stamper has said publicly and repeatedly that he was wrong.

Faint solace to those whose lives he took that week.


Still, who better to speak against the heavy handed tactics than someone who used them, saw the aftermath, and regrets it.
 
2011-11-29 12:02:41 PM
Alex Sanders: Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.

Same as when retired or former gangsters are free to discuss how their gangs were.
Why would this street gang be any different?
 
2011-11-29 12:05:01 PM
moops: Norm Stamper - wasn't he a character in Ken Kesey's "Sometimes a Great Notion"?

Awesome reference.
 
2011-11-29 12:06:15 PM
Stamper's one of the good ones now. At least he learned from his actions and regrets what he did, unlike the standard "we did everything right" cop response.

(and as an aside, he's also become a rather vehement and vocal critic of the drug war)
 
2011-11-29 12:10:12 PM
Alex Sanders: Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.

Because the slightest bit of dissent -- just signing a petition in favor of marijuana legalization -- can cost them their jobs (PDF Warning)
 
2011-11-29 12:14:38 PM
So he's been guilt tripped enough over the decision to cave and reverse his thinking?
 
2011-11-29 12:14:57 PM
Alex Sanders: Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.

So, it's a bad thing that people learn from their mistakes and try to help others avoid them in the future? Sometimes you don't see how bad things have gotten until after something serious goes tits up.
 
2011-11-29 12:16:54 PM
number8: Stamper's one of the good ones now. At least he learned from his actions and regrets what he did, unlike the standard "we did everything right" cop response.

(and as an aside, he's also become a rather vehement and vocal critic of the drug war)


He's become one of my heroes. I really admire him and am grateful that he's speaking out.
 
2011-11-29 12:18:33 PM
Ed Grubermann: Alex Sanders: Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.

So, it's a bad thing that people learn from their mistakes and try to help others avoid them in the future? Sometimes you don't see how bad things have gotten until after something serious goes tits up.


What are you, some kinda whiny, libtard, flip-flopper pussy?
 
2011-11-29 12:21:24 PM
Alex Sanders: Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become, but never did a damn thing about it when the were in uniform and could do a bit of good.

encrypted-tbn0.google.com

That's a firing son
 
2011-11-29 12:22:11 PM
Alex Sanders: "Nice how its always former or retired cops who are free to discuss how bad police militarization or the War on Drugs has become"

Well, yeah, almost by definition.
If an active-duty policeman were to publicly talk shiat about the department, he'd be a former or retired cop by the time it hit the papers.
 
2011-11-29 12:22:57 PM
Stamper is a lying douchebag. He deliberately messed up the response to the WTO riots in order to spite the mayor who had given him crap previously.

It's widely held that if Stamper had been doing his job and not doing his best to play politics with the city council, the WTO debacle wouldn't have gotten anywhere near as bad as they did.
 
2011-11-29 12:29:05 PM
LordZorch
Stamper is a lying douchebag. He deliberately messed up the response to the WTO riots in order to spite the mayor who had given him crap previously.

Hurrrrrrrrrr. Thanks for another moronic comment from your strange alternate reality. Oh wait, you're just a pathetic troll.
 
2011-11-29 12:29:51 PM
LordZorch: Stamper is a lying douchebag. He deliberately messed up the response to the WTO riots in order to spite the mayor who had given him crap previously.

It's widely held that if Stamper had been doing his job and not doing his best to play politics with the city council, the WTO debacle wouldn't have gotten anywhere near as bad as they did.


Setting dumpsters on fire, then pushing them into the streets while dressed as a sea turtle, or kicking out Niketown signs while wearing Nike shoes makes for long days on the job trying to deal with and explain things to city council.
 
2011-11-29 12:36:31 PM
StopLurkListen: InOmnibusCaritas: Police officer critiquing other police officers does not equal ironic. Just interesting.

In the "Alanis Morissette" definition, no, but in the classic dictionary definition "Happening in the opposite way to what is expected, thus typically causing wry amusement" then yes, this may actually be ironic. It's like 10,000 police chiefs telling you you're too heavy handed when all you need is a Fox Newser in a skirt.


I think Alanis Morissette was being ironic when she wrote the song.
 
2011-11-29 12:38:09 PM
Joe Blowme: So, ignoring the laws and pandering to dirty lazy dip shiats is heavy handed?

Do you ever have anything legitimate to say? I mean, how old must it get to troll, get some people (who are having real discussions) pissed off, then I dunno...what do you do? Feel good about yourself? Look around the house and think "oh HELL yeah", I caused a ruckus on the internet! What gives? If there were people figuring things out (regardless of what 'things' would be), would you just fark things up for the sheer hell of it?
 
2011-11-29 12:41:34 PM
We gave up many of our basic rights and freedoms after September 11th.

"Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one."

A forward thinking "hippie" of his time. Benjamin Franklin
 
2011-11-29 12:42:02 PM
An estimated 50,000 activists from around the world flooded Seattle and occupied strategic crossroads, blocking delegates' access to the convention centre where the talks were to be held.

The demonstrations seriously disrupted the trade talks. The opening ceremony had to be cancelled because most delegates were unable to get to the meetings, and even US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was stuck in her hotel room unable to give the speech she had prepared.

The police responded by spraying the crowd with tear gas, That, says Chief Stamper, set the tone for the next three days.


Sounds like a heavy-handed response was necessary when you got that many radicals who are illegally trying to disrupt an international convention like that.
 
2011-11-29 12:42:40 PM
www.davidduke.com

I'll just leave this here
 
2011-11-29 12:46:26 PM
Man, I bet they can't wait for that sound riot control device to be 100% effective in the field and has all the bugs worked out.

It's going to be really hard to rally sympathies from outsiders. As where before you'd have a photo of a crowd getting tear gassed, and you see the smoke and hear the hissing of the canisters.

Now, you just have a weird looking device and people on the ground. Easy to blow it off on news saying they are over reacting, ect it's all for drama.

Mark my words, this is a scary device for protesters everywhere and if it successfully implemented into use it might be GG for protest everywhere.
 
2011-11-29 12:53:11 PM
Bob_Sled: I think Alanis Morissette was being ironic when she wrote the song.

One can only hope...
 
2011-11-29 12:56:48 PM
Main problem: It's a totally accepted standard procedure for cops to use pain (in the form of pepper spray, tazers, nightsticks, and other "less-lethal" measures) to force compliance instead of reserving those for self defense or violent suspects (actually violent, not "disagreeing with cop" violent).

Cop: "Do what I say."

Citizen: "No."

Cop: *ZAAAP*
 
2011-11-29 01:01:18 PM
AverageAmericanGuy:
He also had a tablespoon of The Man at Dixie's.


We didn't warn our young, annoying, and brash co-worker about The Man, and let him have a full tablespoon, which he assured us he could handle. When he was vomiting in the bushes Gene chewed us out and said he could be sued for such a thing.

A good time was had by all.
 
2011-11-29 01:02:01 PM
m2313: Voiceofreason01: Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years

1972?


Haven't you ever watched Dirty Harry? Clint Eastwood started it all.
 
2011-11-29 01:02:47 PM
Police chiefs in big cities tend to be left leaning liberals because it's a politically appointed job. Norm was all over the lefty talk shows last week.
 
2011-11-29 01:02:51 PM
Allen. The end.: Joe Blowme: So, ignoring the laws and pandering to dirty lazy dip shiats is heavy handed?

Do you ever have anything legitimate to say? I mean, how old must it get to troll, get some people (who are having real discussions) pissed off, then I dunno...what do you do? Feel good about yourself? Look around the house and think "oh HELL yeah", I caused a ruckus on the internet! What gives? If there were people figuring things out (regardless of what 'things' would be), would you just fark things up for the sheer hell of it?


Wow, truth hurts. Why is every opinion that is not in line with yours trolling? Is there anything that does not outrage you? Do you get mad at chestnuts for being lazy as well?
 
2011-11-29 01:03:29 PM
squidgod2000: Main problem: It's a totally accepted standard procedure for cops to use pain (in the form of pepper spray, tazers, nightsticks, and other "less-lethal" measures) to force compliance instead of reserving those for self defense or violent suspects (actually violent, not "disagreeing with cop" violent).

Cop: "Do what I say."

Citizen: "No."

Cop: *ZAAAP*


Here's an idea:
Don't break the law if you don't want to get f*cked up by the police.
It's been working out pretty well for me so far.
 
2011-11-29 01:05:17 PM
m2313: Voiceofreason01: Come on! Militarization of the police predates the Department of Homeland Security by at least 30 years

1972?


Whenever 'SWAT' was on TV. Regular cops watching that show pretty much started the spread of SWAT teams (and popularized the name).
 
2011-11-29 01:07:24 PM
Could someone please explain to me why we have to allow people to disrupt everybody's lives just because they want to do so? Protesting is fine, but why do people think that protestors should be allowed to stop traffic and conferences and disrupt cities? For instance, when they disrupted the WTO meeting, aren't they interfering with someone's free speech (the people seeking to attend the conference)? Why is it OK for that to happen?

If it is not OK for people to do that, shouldn't the police use tactics to end unlawful conduct? I'd be curious to here an OWS supporter explain to me why people should be allowed to camp out in a park and disrupt businesses and people going to work so they can protest. Why isn't it enough to simply protest and have signs and say what you want to say? What makes it OK to interfere with other people's lives?
 
Displayed 50 of 105 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »