TFA: How To Hit a Woman

Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

Women can be portrayed as crazy beetches while the same behavior from dudes is just showing strong leadership.

Mike_LowELL: shivashakti: Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

The Republicans are looking at long-term strategy here. The lie-berals in Taxachusetts would elect a liberal even if he or she was running against Ronald Reagan. This is branding for the future of the Warren Party. While Northern Liberals will never be intelligent enough to understand the dangers of education, Southerners do. For every single thing you learn, two more questions are created. So in reality, keeping these new questions to a minimum reduces the things that you do not know. And therefore, you are more intelligent. Do you understand what I am trying to say?

This is gold

blondski: Women can be portrayed as crazy beetches while the same behavior from dudes is just showing strong leadership.

I could explain the difference, but it requires a lot of math and spatial reasoning . . .

Mike_LowELL: shivashakti: Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

The Republicans are looking at long-term strategy here. The lie-berals in Taxachusetts would elect a liberal even if he or she was running against Ronald Reagan. This is branding for the future of the Warren Party. While Northern Liberals will never be intelligent enough to understand the dangers of education, Southerners do. For every single thing you learn, two more questions are created. So in reality, keeping these new questions to a minimum reduces the things that you do not know. And therefore, you are more intelligent. Do you understand what I am trying to say?

yogaFLAME: Yo, check this out: men drive a car like this. do doo, doo be doo be do

Yeah, but women, see, they drive a car like this. screeee crash explosion

I really shouldn't have laughed at that. Bud I did.

Mike_LowELL: shivashakti: Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

The Republicans are looking at long-term strategy here. The lie-berals in Taxachusetts would elect a liberal even if he or she was running against Ronald Reagan. This is branding for the future of the Warren Party. While Northern Liberals will never be intelligent enough to understand the dangers of education, Southerners do. For every single thing you learn, two more questions are created. So in reality, keeping these new questions to a minimum reduces the things that you do not know. And therefore, you are more intelligent. Do you understand what I am trying to say?



That is brilliantly scrambled!
/Surprised to see so many people not getting that this is a joke.

blondski: Women can be portrayed as crazy beetches while the same behavior from dudes is just showing strong leadership.

Example?

Mike_LowELL: shivashakti: Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

The Republicans are looking at long-term strategy here. The lie-berals in Taxachusetts would elect a liberal even if he or she was running against Ronald Reagan. This is branding for the future of the Warren Party. While Northern Liberals will never be intelligent enough to understand the dangers of education, Southerners do. For every single thing you learn, two more questions are created. So in reality, keeping these new questions to a minimum reduces the things that you do not know. And therefore, you are more intelligent. Do you understand what I am trying to say?

And I thought I was drunk.
/Think I kinda get what you're saying

ZAZ: Weaver95

Boston media practically declared her the winner of the election before she was even a candidate.

Seeing as Brownie needs to find 250,000 new votes and keep everyone that voted for him in 2010 just to tie the thing, I'd say they have the narrative right. Sucks for him, but it's his own fault for not broadening his base over the past two years. All those goosestep votes with the GOP, and putting his fingers in the financial cookie jar isn't going to make finding them easy.

Warren on the other hand is the anti-Coakley. People like her, shes genuine, and people want to help her get elected. He volunteer meetings so far have drawn thousands.

Hense the Rove attack ads.

Weaver95: yeesh...the GOP is really afraid of Elizabeth Warren.

IF the GOP is afraif of this women... and this ad is your basis for your conclusion.

Then the Liberal Left are "piss their pants terrified" of Sarah Palin.

Weaver95: GAT_00: ZAZ: Weaver95

Boston media practically declared her the winner of the election before she was even a candidate.

To be fair, if a Teabag-associated Republican is able to beat a liberal who is openly advocating for the people and not the richest 1% in Massachusetts, there's no hope left for the Democratic Party.

yeah, but Elizabeth Warren has gotten some air time nation wide. I think I even caught Limbaugh ranting about her a couple/few times. that's how you know you've made the big time - when Limbaugh says he hates yer guts then you know you're kind of a big deal.

I've read a few things on her, and what she talks about seems like common sense to me. she's not over the top and while I think I might quibble with her on some relatively minor details she seems like a reasonable sort of person. I'm not sure what it is she said that pissed off so many republicans.

First, shes a turncoat. As the party left her, she went Librul and that really gets their goat.

Second Commufascisoilist

Third, Jesus.


She's basically Huntsman with the ability to see which way the headwinds are going.

Attack ads against men are different than from attack ads against women
/FTFS

jehovahs witness protection: Also: overly vain, grotesquely ugly, unmarried, amoral, slutty, nutty, arrogant, and stupid.

Nail meet head.

Bolded the good ones

Weaver95: ZAZ: Weaver95

Boston media practically declared her the winner of the election before she was even a candidate.

All I know is that the GOP seems really afraid of this woman. whatever she said really got them riled up.

She said no one gets rich on their own. Our tax dollars create the infrastructure that business owners require to thrive. So suck it up and pay your fair share, one percenters. That easily digestible truth is what they're scared of.

Mike_LowELL: shivashakti: Fortunately, it's Massachusetts where most people don't have a weird phobia against the educated. Calling someone a "Professor" might seem like an insult in the Bible Belt but that doesn't really fly in New England, where some of the oldest and most prestigious schools in America are.

That's not a particularly useful strategy.

The Republicans are looking at long-term strategy here. The lie-berals in Taxachusetts would elect a liberal even if he or she was running against Ronald Reagan. This is branding for the future of the Warren Party. While Northern Liberals will never be intelligent enough to understand the dangers of education, Southerners do. For every single thing you learn, two more questions are created. So in reality, keeping these new questions to a minimum reduces the things that you do not know. And therefore, you are more intelligent. Do you understand what I am trying to say?

way to out yourself as an idiot

TFA: "It's a short hop from extreme to crazy. The Crossroads GPS ad against Elizabeth Warren works not just by portraying her as radically liberal, but by implying that she is unhinged."


Kind of like this?


/hot
//it's cool when the popular side does it

casual disregard: Prodigy AK: Weaver95: yeesh...the GOP is really afraid of Elizabeth Warren.

IF the GOP is afraif of this women... and this ad is your basis for your conclusion.

Then the Liberal Left are "piss their pants terrified" of Sarah Palin.

Sarah Palin sells books and shows up on talk shows. Elizabeth Warren is a legislator who guides the nation with her peers.

Not an apt comparison.

What a short memory you have..

spmkk: TFA: "It's a short hop from extreme to crazy. The Crossroads GPS ad against Elizabeth Warren works not just by portraying her as radically liberal, but by implying that she is unhinged."


Kind of like this?

[static.thehollywoodgossip.com image 344x465]
/hot
//it's cool when the popular side does it

fusillade762: She said no one gets rich on their own. Our tax dollars create the infrastructure that business owners require to thrive. So suck it up and pay your fair share, one percenters. That easily digestible truth is what they're scared of.

My issue with her is that they already did. Nothing is free. When businesses ship goods, they pay companies which in turn pay taxes and fees like fuel taxes, vehicle registration, various apportionments to different states, etc.

Both companies pay taxes for property, payroll, etc.

Everyone has paid what was required. Now she's saying they shouldn't oppose paying more simply because they used the infrastructure (that they already paid to use). She leaves the part in parentheses off.

It's a bit like saying I owe a percentage to Sprint because I used their network to transmit a successful stock transmission, or perhaps I owe a tax to Cox communications because I used their network to send my resume for a newer better paying job. Most people would instantly call bullshiat because I already paid for Sprint and/or Cox.

If there's a problem with the fees for the infrastructure not matching the costs of maintaining/building that infrastructure, then the appropriate place to deal with that disparity is with the set of fees that are ostensibly set up to fund that infrastructure. It's inappropriate and ripe for abuse to say that I have to pay fees in one area to make up for the fees you didn't ask for nor collect in another.

Imagine the manager of an apartment complex raising everyone's rent and justifying it because you use water (which is already collected in a separate itemized bill). If water costs to the complex were higher then water rates charged to tenants, the only proper response I can see is to raise billed water rates to cover the actual rates of supplying water to the complex.

On another note, do any congresspeople ever introduce bills that require the additional money raised be used building or improving roads or schools?

casual disregard:

Sarah Palin sells books and shows up on talk shows. Elizabeth Warren is a legislator who guides the nation with her peers.

Not an apt comparison.

She is a legislator? Really? Where does she legislate? What office does she hold?

Guides the nation? Geez, Obama didn't even believe in her enough to fight for her confirmation.

Should be stock transaction, not transmission.

Wow, what that article taught me is that politics are farking hilarious in California. I was cracking up at the wicked witch one, and the Barbara Boxer balloon was just too awesome for words.