If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Bleacher Report) Cool Six reasons why the Steelers have what it takes to win the Super Bowl (but don't tell the Green Bay Packers)   (bleacherreport.com) divider line 141
More: Cool, Steelers, Super Bowl, Jerricho Cotchery, Super Bowl XLVI, Mike Wallace, LaMarr Woodley, Matt Schaub, Joe Flacco  
•       •       •

1544 clicks; posted to Sports » on 26 Nov 2011 at 3:23 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



141 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-26 01:20:37 PM
Y'inz scared n'at?
 
2011-11-26 01:28:04 PM
vudukungfu: Y'inz scared n'at?

What a bunch of jagoffs.

Seriously though, I don't see them taking it all the way this year. I guess anything could happen though. The AFC is pretty farking tight about now.
 
2011-11-26 01:38:08 PM
Because, because, because, because, becaaaaause; because of the wonderful things they do(es) ;)
 
2011-11-26 01:47:29 PM
Six reasons some hack Bleacher Report "writer" says why the Steelers have what it takes to win the Super Bowl (but don't tell the Green Bay Packers)
 
2011-11-26 02:50:57 PM
Let's see them get into the playoffs first.
 
2011-11-26 03:09:39 PM
Well that wasn't overtly fanboyish at all.
 
2011-11-26 03:13:23 PM
oldebayer: Let's see them get into the playoffs first.

It's going to be tough, actually. Everyone and their mother in the AFC is 7-3 about now or thereabouts. We could tie Baltimore in the AFC North with a win over the chefs tomorrow (and they had BETTER win, great googly moogley), but even still it's a crap shoot. Even a wildcard showing is contentious at this point. Going to be interesting for sure. Nobody is a lock at this point.
 
2011-11-26 03:29:14 PM
Every other team is auditioning for 2nd place.

Packers are going all the way -- and I'm not even a Packers fan.
 
2011-11-26 03:30:40 PM
I'm a Packer fan anyways, but the defense of the Ravens looks to put up a great game against a GB offense. I'd take the 49ers against them in a rematch as well, that was an entertaining game.

Go Ravens.
 
2011-11-26 03:32:51 PM
redmond24: Every other team is auditioning for 2nd place.

Packers are going all the way -- and I'm not even a Packers fan.


The Packers are my `alternate' team to root for, have been for years. They're looking mighty fine for sure. Wouldn't surprise me at all to see them in the big owl, you know the superb one. Steelers have been my team all my life, and I'd honestly be fairly surprised to see them advance past the first week of the playoffs. I hope they prove me wrong, but that's my estimation anyway.
 
2011-11-26 03:33:50 PM
eh, whatevs.
We know what the Packers did the last time they played the Steelers.

GO PACKERS!
 
2011-11-26 03:34:02 PM
redmond24: Packers are going all the way -- and I'm not even a Packers fan.

It does look that way. Then again, it's looked that way for teams maaaany times before.
 
2011-11-26 03:39:37 PM
Also here's a weird possibility. I've seen teams undefeated twice in the regular season, the Broncos back in 1990 something or other, and the Pats who lost in the big owl. I've also seen one winless team that I recall, the Lions a year or three ago. The Packers are currently undefeated, and the Colts currently winless. Could we see TWO perfect seasons? Unlikely, but that would be interesting for sure.
 
2011-11-26 03:40:06 PM
User content?
 
2011-11-26 03:40:31 PM
er wait no the Broncos actually did lose a game, what was I thinking. The Dolphins in the 70's (before my time) was the only other undefeated team if I remember right. But given my previous comment, I obviously don't remember things right.
 
2011-11-26 03:41:52 PM
nekom: Also here's a weird possibility. I've seen teams undefeated twice in the regular season, the Broncos back in 1990 something or other, and the Pats who lost in the big owl. I've also seen one winless team that I recall, the Lions a year or three ago. The Packers are currently undefeated, and the Colts currently winless. Could we see TWO perfect seasons? Unlikely, but that would be interesting for sure.

The Broncos were never undefeated. Well Boise State but not Denver.
 
2011-11-26 03:44:20 PM
Sabyen91: nekom: Also here's a weird possibility. I've seen teams undefeated twice in the regular season, the Broncos back in 1990 something or other, and the Pats who lost in the big owl. I've also seen one winless team that I recall, the Lions a year or three ago. The Packers are currently undefeated, and the Colts currently winless. Could we see TWO perfect seasons? Unlikely, but that would be interesting for sure.

The Broncos were never undefeated. Well Boise State but not Denver.


Yeah, I remember now, they lost to the Giants that season I believe. They might have lost a game after that, but that's what broke their streak that season.
 
2011-11-26 03:48:55 PM
nekom: Sabyen91: nekom: Also here's a weird possibility. I've seen teams undefeated twice in the regular season, the Broncos back in 1990 something or other, and the Pats who lost in the big owl. I've also seen one winless team that I recall, the Lions a year or three ago. The Packers are currently undefeated, and the Colts currently winless. Could we see TWO perfect seasons? Unlikely, but that would be interesting for sure.

The Broncos were never undefeated. Well Boise State but not Denver.

Yeah, I remember now, they lost to the Giants that season I believe. They might have lost a game after that, but that's what broke their streak that season.


That is why we are still subjected to Mercury Morris and Larry Czonka every year. Ugh. I was rooting for the Colts a couple of years back just to shut them up.
 
2011-11-26 03:50:59 PM
Six reasons? One for every referee on the field when the Stealers play?
 
2011-11-26 03:51:34 PM
nekom: Yeah, I remember now, they lost to the Giants that season I believe.

Yup, which is kinda what other people are saying for the Giants game next week already.

/kinda like they were talking about how the Lions ended a Packers' perfect season a long time ago
 
2011-11-26 03:53:07 PM
Is the seven reason RAPE??
 
2011-11-26 03:53:29 PM
article fails for the Omar Tomlin section alone . Master Motivator ? Always up for Big Games? LMAO. Hell, let's forget the countless examples so far from his career where this could be proven wrong... surely the writer remembers WEEK 1 ?!?!?!??!?!?!

nekom: It's going to be tough, actually. Everyone and their mother in the AFC is 7-3 about now or thereabouts. We could tie Baltimore in the AFC North with a win over the chefs tomorrow (and they had BETTER win, great googly moogley), but even still it's a crap shoot. Even a wildcard showing is contentious at this point. Going to be interesting for sure. Nobody is a lock at this point.


The remaining schedule is
@ KC
CIN
CLE
@SF
StL
@ CLE

that's 2 games against arguably decent teams, and one of them is a home game (and already beat opponent on road).

They should finish 11-5 at absolute worst. 12-4 is reasonably possible. Is that enough to win the AFCN ? Probably not since they already dumped two to the Ratbirds who finish with

@ CLE
IND
@ SD
CLE
@ CIN


Which brings us back to Tomlin the "Master Motivator".
Good job literally throwing away an entire week this year with a relatively cupcake schedule.

The article did get 2 things correct. When healthy, the Steelers do have the most versatile and complete set of WR/TEs in the league. They are dangerous out of spread, trips bunch, and double/single WR sets. Why the owners keep the 'tradition' and roll with the slow turf amazes me. It also inhibits the pass rush, which Defense wise, is about the only real strong suit left on the team.

This point also gets at the other part the article gets right. The Steelers WR/TE sets are versatile enough to ruin teams out of the no huddle. This also works largely because Big (supposedly dumb) Ben is calling the plays himself rather than relying on Bruce Tardrians and his overly predictable tendencies. This team should -- and is starting to--- actually play predominantly out of the shotgun. I like this for Mendenhall as well because he can see the hole(s) better immediately. Of course, this does take away the PA , which is something Ben excels at, particularly on rollouts. You can't have it all though, and with the (improving) yet still bad pass protection, I'll live with it and keep Ben alive through the rest of the year.



Of course, when it's all said and done, playoff football is about being healthy, playing relatively mistake-free, getting the right matchups, and peaking at just the right time of the season. It does seem that Steelers are slowly improving and Ratbirds are slowly regressing.
 
2011-11-26 03:53:47 PM
redmond24: Every other team is auditioning for 2nd place.

Packers are going all the way -- and I'm not even a Packers fan.


leibrockk.files.wordpress.com

I'm a huge Steelers homer and I'm not sure that they have what it takes, but crowning the Packers in Week 11 is more than a little bit premature.
 
2011-11-26 03:56:05 PM
AFC sucks at this point. No one has much going on. Pack wins.
 
2011-11-26 03:56:09 PM
nekom: We could tie Baltimore in the AFC North with a win over the chefs tomorrow

I believe that game is Monday Night. Figured I'd tell you so you don't make the wrong plans.
 
2011-11-26 03:57:42 PM
DrippinBalls: AFC sucks at this point. No one has much going on. Pack wins.

That sounds like 2008 reversed...
 
2011-11-26 03:57:52 PM
jaylectricity: nekom: We could tie Baltimore in the AFC North with a win over the chefs tomorrow

I believe that game is Monday Night. Figured I'd tell you so you don't make the wrong plans.


You would believe wrong. Sunday, 8:20.
 
2011-11-26 04:00:24 PM
Adolf Oliver Nipples: jaylectricity: nekom: We could tie Baltimore in the AFC North with a win over the chefs tomorrow

I believe that game is Monday Night. Figured I'd tell you so you don't make the wrong plans.

You would believe wrong. Sunday, 8:20.


Oh that's right. I knew it was a night game. I should probably double-check something like that before I go wasting my time posting.
 
2011-11-26 04:01:59 PM
19-0 Packers over the Pats in the Super Bowl is the optimal outcome. Taking the record they thought was going to be theirs in their faces.

I would hope that Brady/Belichick are so devastated by it that they retire.
 
2011-11-26 04:02:58 PM
Leader O'Cola: They should finish 11-5 at absolute worst. 12-4 is reasonably possible. Is that enough to win the AFCN ? Probably not since they already dumped two to the Ratbirds who finish with

They'd be having a hell of a season about now if they could have figured out a way to beat them at least once. I'm not ruling them out, not by any means, just saying it's pretty rough in that division and the AFC in general.

jaylectricity: I believe that game is Monday Night. Figured I'd tell you so you don't make the wrong plans.

Sunday night actually, that's what nfl.com says anyway. And my plans would never be wrong, they would be to drink beer. Never a bad plan there.
 
2011-11-26 04:05:10 PM
Article lost all credibility about 1 or 2 sentences in, once the writer lamented Matt Schaub's hand injury knocking him out for the season.

If you are going to go full fanboy in a sports blog, go for it. A lot of people do it (me included). But get your facts straight before you go submitting it to Fark so that you can get some page view revenue.

And just because it amuses me (Mr. A. O. Nipples made me think of this)

4.bp.blogspot.com

gothamist.com

/is this guy going to be the Wampler of the Sports tab?
//if I say his name three times will his articles start appearing again?
///just in case, I ain't doing it.
 
2011-11-26 04:05:22 PM
Generation_D: Six reasons? One for every referee on the field when the Stealers play?

Must be a Seahawks fan. LOL
 
2011-11-26 04:06:34 PM
fatalvenom: Is the seven reason RAPE??

Dude! I thought you were above that. sigh
 
2011-11-26 04:07:15 PM
Relatively Obscure: redmond24: Packers are going all the way -- and I'm not even a Packers fan.

It does look that way. Then again, it's looked that way for teams maaaany times before.


That's true but I think the lockout has motivated them and has kept them hungry since they didn't really get to enjoy being Champions.
 
2011-11-26 04:08:47 PM
IAmRight: 19-0 Packers over the Pats in the Super Bowl is the optimal outcome. Taking the record they thought was going to be theirs in their faces.

I would hope that Brady/Belichick are so devastated by it that they retire.


I would gladly see the Steelers knocked out of the playoffs for that game! And probably have a football induced orgasm!
 
2011-11-26 04:23:21 PM
Please stop giving greens to Bleacher Report pig crap. A retarded monkey with a typewriter that was missing 6 letters could write better sports content.

Also, Steelers suck.
 
2011-11-26 04:33:21 PM
Pretty much every team page on Bleacher Report has at least one article titled "Six reasons why the ________ have what it takes to win the Super Bowl".

Stay tuned tomorrow for my five page editorial on why the Browns have what it takes to win the Super Bowl.
 
2011-11-26 04:36:06 PM
The first slide showed exactly why they would lose (again) to the Packers in the Super Bowl. The "Gunslinger" will throw two or three interceptions and give Rodgers two or three more chances to score.

/GO PACK GO
 
2011-11-26 04:40:15 PM
Really?

What a putrid piece of fanboy drivel.

Packers will win the Super Bowl. They may not have an undefeated season--but they might. Who care about that? The important game is the last one of the year.

/Packer fan, but not a fan of the perfect season hype. I almost hope they lose one to make sure they're scared and play harder in the playoffs.
 
2011-11-26 04:42:45 PM
Stop talking about it as if the Packers have already won the Superbowl (this season's). Do you want to sound like Patriot fans?

/Packer fan
 
2011-11-26 04:50:58 PM
I have been dying for a team (other than the Patriots) to go undefeated to shut Mercury Morris's piehole for all time. Until recently I wouldn't have minded it being the Packers this year. But Christ almighty, you Packer fanboys are so sure, so smug in your beliefs that the Packers are mortal locks for the championship that I can't help but hope that they pull a New England just to see the looks on your faces. The arrogance is nauseating.
 
2011-11-26 04:54:18 PM
Adolf Oliver Nipples: But Christ almighty, you Packer fanboys are so sure, so smug in your beliefs that the Packers are mortal locks for the championship that I can't help but hope that they pull a New England just to see the looks on your faces. The arrogance is nauseating.

The majority of people saying it aren't Packers fans. I'm rooting for the Aaron Rodgerses. As long as he's a Packer, I'll like the Packers (and probably longer, since they're pretty much the best franchise to root for as someone who likes the idea of cities/fans owning a team.
 
2011-11-26 04:54:31 PM
Leader O'Cola: The remaining schedule is
@ KC
CIN
CLE
@SF
StL
@ CLE


Without reading the article, I assumed these were the six reasons. If the Stillers can sweep the Browns and the Bengals, they could easily make the playoffs. Once they're in the playoffs, it's a whole new season, and the Steelers always bring it during the playoffs. And then they'll lose in the Superbowl, regardless of who takes the NFC, because this just isn't their season and you can tell by watching them flail around.

If the Steelers can't sweep the Browns, then they clearly don't deserve to be in the playoffs.
 
2011-11-26 04:55:24 PM
Zoomaster: The first slide showed exactly why they would lose (again) to the Packers in the Super Bowl. The "Gunslinger" will throw two or three interceptions and give Rodgers two or three more chances to score.

/GO PACK GO


you do realize

1- he's not being as much a gunslinger this year
2- the pack's D has fallen off a cliff this year-- while supposedly healthier, to boot ?
(yes, at the same time, the Offense has gotten a lot better too)
 
2011-11-26 05:11:54 PM
All Packer fans I know, myself included, don't care about a "perfect season". We would rather go 11-5 (they already won 11 games, so using that) and win the super bowl than go 18-1 like the Patriots did a few seasons ago. Anyone bragging about a perfect season is not a true Packers fan.
 
2011-11-26 05:15:12 PM
machoprogrammer: All Packer fans I know, myself included, don't care about a "perfect season". We would rather go 11-5 (they already won 11 games, so using that) and win the super bowl than go 18-1 like the Patriots did a few seasons ago. Anyone bragging about a perfect season is not a true Packers fan.

I am a Packer fan and I care about the perfect season. Just so this guy will shut up.

shoeblogs.com
 
2011-11-26 05:28:51 PM
Leader O'Cola: 2- the pack's D has fallen off a cliff this year-- while supposedly healthier, to boot ?

Reports of their demise have been greatly exaggerated.

They actually give up fewer points per game than, say, Chicago. (20.6 to 20.7) They give up the second-most passing yardage per game...but they still have a better passer rating against opponents than Chicago and Pittsburgh (and 8th overall). The rush D is mediocre but most contenders aren't really rushing teams. They've come up with a stop every single time they've needed to (like Week 1 against New Orleans).

Yeah, they give up yards. I think we all know that yards don't win games. Otherwise Kyle Orton would be a top QB.
 
2011-11-26 05:36:04 PM
The Browns alone will keep the Steelers out of the Playoffs. Hell, Browns are still my bet to represent the AFC N.
 
2011-11-26 05:39:27 PM
I stopped reading & started skimming when I saw the author say that Joe Flacco wasn't an elite quarterback yet, but he's gaining.

I'd never truly count out the Steelers as long as they have a shot (which they do), but a few points indicate maybe this isn't really their year:

-Pittsburgh is 2-3 against teams with a winning record so far.
-The Steelers are 22nd in the league in scoring.
-They're 17th in rushing.
-Tied for last in the league in turnover differential, with -10.
-Dead last in total takeaways, with 6 (the second-worst, New Orleans, has 9).

I'll be the first to admit that injuries have played a part in that (particularly on defense), and Ben Roethlisberger is plenty capable of winning big games for them regardless of any other deficiencies, but without a turnaround in most (if not all) of those areas they just don't look like a Super Bowl team this year.
 
2011-11-26 05:53:34 PM
Harv72b: -Tied for last in the league in turnover differential, with -10.

That's a more important number than most people realize. It isn't just Ben throwing stupid passes either like he used to have a problem with, they're coughing it all all over the field. It's a pretty huge farking problem.
 
Displayed 50 of 141 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »