If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(ESPN) Obvious LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again the SEC is the best conference in college football   (sports.espn.go.com) divider line 117
More: Obvious  
•       •       •

899 clicks; posted to Sports » on 26 Nov 2011 at 3:10 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



117 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-25 08:12:49 PM
The Securities and Exchange Commission and Lightspeed University did what now?!
 
2011-11-25 08:18:07 PM
*grumble*
 
2011-11-25 08:21:47 PM
HawgWild: *grumble*

The 41-3 beating to end the game is particularly galling I'd think.

I wanted Arkansas to win, just to break the BCS so there were no conference championship winners in the title game and just generally fark LSU, but oh well. I'm convinced they really are the best team this year.
 
2011-11-25 08:31:42 PM
HawgWild: *grumble*

.....
*grumble*grumble*
 
2011-11-25 08:50:33 PM
some.old.lady.: HawgWild: *grumble*

.....
*grumble*grumble*


*grumble*grumble*grumble*
 
2011-11-25 08:51:13 PM
some.old.lady.: .....
*grumble*grumble*


i47.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-25 09:11:11 PM
LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again the SEC is the best-paid conference in college football

FTFY, subby
 
2011-11-26 12:19:26 AM
Adolf Oliver Nipples: LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again the SEC is the best-paid conference in college football

It damn well better be.
 
2011-11-26 01:21:20 AM
Refs are pissed because they didn't even have to try today.
 
2011-11-26 01:58:47 AM
Pastor of Muppets: some.old.lady.: HawgWild: *grumble*

.....
*grumble*grumble*

*grumble*grumble*grumble*


.....
*two* Texans grumbling for the Hogs?

Well, come on in and set a spell ;)
 
2011-11-26 03:10:56 AM
That's okay. We just root for Georgia.
 
2011-11-26 03:13:19 AM
Gosling: That's okay. We just root for Georgia.

Who is this "we" that you speak of? I'm no fan of LSU, but I'd much rather the Bulldogs burn than anything else.
 
2011-11-26 03:13:29 AM
unless it just proves the third best team in the SEC kinda sucks, in which case it proves only that the SEC is overrated.

/alabama better not get a rematch.
 
2011-11-26 03:21:09 AM
ArtosRC: Gosling: That's okay. We just root for Georgia.

Who is this "we" that you speak of? I'm no fan of LSU, but I'd much rather the Bulldogs burn than anything else.


I couldn't care less for any particular team. I just root for the one that would cause the most chaos in the rankings. In this case, that would be Georgia.

Go Dogs! Hail Eris!
 
2011-11-26 03:56:44 AM
LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again that LSU is the best conference in college football

fixed for subby


LSU is in a world of their own. Give them the damn crystal football and let Alabama and Oklahoma State play for second place.
 
2011-11-26 03:59:38 AM
PowerSlacker: LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again that LSU is the best conference in college football

fixed for subby


LSU is in a world of their own. Give them the damn crystal football and let Alabama and Oklahoma State play for second place.


Maybe, maybe not. Miles hasn't had too many opportunities to lose a game yet with his wackyass playcalling, but it will happen.
 
2011-11-26 04:03:11 AM
I live in Birmingham. AL. You should have seen this place after the Alabama-LSU game. Dead silence, even shock. You'd have thought someone had died. SEC football is a religion all its own down here.
 
MBK [TotalFark]
2011-11-26 05:03:37 AM
Tergiversada: I live in Birmingham. AL. You should have seen this place after the Alabama-LSU game. Dead silence, even shock. You'd have thought someone had died. SEC football is a religion all its own down here.

Last year, a guy poisoned trees because Alabama lost. And he didn't even go to Alabama!

I'd say it more than a religion at this point.
 
2011-11-26 05:14:10 AM
the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.
 
2011-11-26 05:54:11 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


You sound like a Big 10 fan.
 
2011-11-26 07:02:12 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


Remember to apply the ointment to inflamed areas, but not so much that it looks like you're lubing up for a horsecock.
 
2011-11-26 07:12:15 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


God I hate saying this, because fark the SEC, but LSU did lay the smackdown to Oregon earlier this year. It's not like LSU was avoiding tough games non-conference, so they deserve to be in the title game. However, I hope for a rematch of LSU and Alabama simply because the clamor for a change in the BCS from all the other conferences might finally become too big to ignore. The title game should never be a rematch and should never feature teams that didn't win their conferences.
 
2011-11-26 07:41:03 AM
As a Penn State/Pedo State/Big Ten fan, all I can say is that THIS YEAR the SEC is hands-down the best conference in NCAA football. THIS YEAR I would take the top five SEC teams against the top five of any other conference. Hell, except for the Big Ten, I would take any of the top 5 SEC teams against the top 2 of any other conference.

The Big Ten teams always find a way to beat each other (playing against Minnesota and Indiana generally being the exception to the rule)...Nebraska found that out this year...no more of this "two tough games a year with weeks to prepare between them" crap. In Big Ten conference play almost every conference game is tough. And this is year after year after year--unlike the SEC.

God, I hate Alabama and LSU, but I think that is what the BCS Championship game is going to come down to.
 
2011-11-26 08:07:13 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


As much as I am absolutely loathe to praise anything associated with LSU, you clearly know nothing of college football if you don't think they have more than proven themselves with the gauntlet they have run this season. I admit Arkansas does not have their resume, but I think LSU emphatically made their point about their superiority to Arkansas last night. And we have seen these arguments about "overrated" SEC teams getting BCS championship nods only to watch them destroy the heavy favorites in the game (Florida and LSU over OSU in successive years). When the SEC has won five straight BCS titles over a wide range of other conference foes, that's not a coincidence.
 
2011-11-26 08:15:53 AM
SEC is totally over rated. Just look how they do in the BCS National Championship game each year. Makes me shake my head.

/sarcasm off
 
2011-11-26 08:21:48 AM
Gosling: That's okay. We just root for Georgia.

Wow I rarely see this on Fark.

ArtosRC: Gosling: That's okay. We just root for Georgia.

Who is this "we" that you speak of? I'm no fan of LSU, but I'd much rather the Bulldogs burn than anything else.


Then again, Fark never fails to disappoint.
 
2011-11-26 08:43:12 AM
If Bobby Petrino had borrowed a tactic from coaching genius Houston Nutt, and handed out miniature wooden baseball bats to his players for inspiration prior to the game start, Arkansas would have been the winner.
 
2011-11-26 08:43:51 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


9/10 this one was really good.
 
2011-11-26 08:53:26 AM
I wanted to see LSU lose, just for the BCS carnage.

Instead, I got to see Bobby Petrino cry like a biatch. That was so much more satisfying.
 
2011-11-26 09:13:21 AM
I love that people continue to destroy the SEC scheduling as though every other conference is finding a way to play 35 ranked teams, four NFL teams, and the 1985 Bears in their 12 games. "OH MY GOD, THE SEC TEAMS ALWAYS PLAY TWO CRAP DIVISION 2 TEAMS AND NEVER PLAY HARD OOC GAMES".

Ignoring Boise St and Houston, let's take a look at the rest of the Top 10:
*Oklahoma St - Powerhouse Sunbelt team Louisiana-Lafayette, Pac-12 monster Arizona, Tulsa, and two Big 12 pitfalls Kansas and Missouri. Then, they lost to a..what...21 point underdog?
*Virginia Tech - App St, East Carolina, Arkansas St, Marshall, Boston College, Duke, North Carolina. Seriously. Tell everybody that was their basketball schedule so people will be impressed.
*Stanford - San Jose St, Duke, Arizona, Colorado, Washington St, Oregon St. No freaking wonder they were so good most of the year. They got to hang on to a zero in the loss column by playing teams with a combined record of 41-60. Thank God a USC team on probation was there to really lift the SoS.
*Oklahoma - Tulsa, Missouri, Ball St, and Kansas. You could, almost, talk about Oklahoma's schedule since they played, at least, 5 ranked teams like LSU, Arkansas, and Alabama. Too bad they lost to two teams that are a combined 6-9 in the Big 12. Real conference battles there, man. And, even then, they still have a chance to lose to their actual big game.
*Oregon - Nevada, Missouri St, Arizona, Colorado, Washington St, Oregon St. All they had to do was beat 4 ranked teams and they would've been the #2 ranked team in the nation with ease.

But, sure. The SEC just schedules cupcakes and, since everyone is biased towards the SEC, that's why they get a team in the national title game every year.
 
2011-11-26 09:15:23 AM
blueyedevil: I wanted to see LSU lose, just for the BCS carnage.

Instead, I got to see Bobby Petrino cry like a biatch. That was so much more satisfying.


I have a great gif of this coming up in a few.
 
2011-11-26 09:17:01 AM
PowerSlacker: LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again that LSU is the best conference in college football

fixed for subby


LSU is in a world of their own. Give them the damn crystal football and let Alabama and Oklahoma State play for second place.


You mean like when they gave the 18-0 Patriots the Super Bowl?
 
2011-11-26 09:30:39 AM
bulldg4life: I love that people continue to destroy the SEC scheduling as though every other conference is finding a way to play 35 ranked teams, four NFL teams, and the 1985 Bears in their 12 games. "OH MY GOD, THE SEC TEAMS ALWAYS PLAY TWO CRAP DIVISION 2 TEAMS AND NEVER PLAY HARD OOC GAMES".

Ignoring Boise St and Houston, let's take a look at the rest of the Top 10:
*Oklahoma St - Powerhouse Sunbelt team Louisiana-Lafayette, Pac-12 monster Arizona, Tulsa, and two Big 12 pitfalls Kansas and Missouri. Then, they lost to a..what...21 point underdog?
*Virginia Tech - App St, East Carolina, Arkansas St, Marshall, Boston College, Duke, North Carolina. Seriously. Tell everybody that was their basketball schedule so people will be impressed.
*Stanford - San Jose St, Duke, Arizona, Colorado, Washington St, Oregon St. No freaking wonder they were so good most of the year. They got to hang on to a zero in the loss column by playing teams with a combined record of 41-60. Thank God a USC team on probation was there to really lift the SoS.
*Oklahoma - Tulsa, Missouri, Ball St, and Kansas. You could, almost, talk about Oklahoma's schedule since they played, at least, 5 ranked teams like LSU, Arkansas, and Alabama. Too bad they lost to two teams that are a combined 6-9 in the Big 12. Real conference battles there, man. And, even then, they still have a chance to lose to their actual big game.
*Oregon - Nevada, Missouri St, Arizona, Colorado, Washington St, Oregon St. All they had to do was beat 4 ranked teams and they would've been the #2 ranked team in the nation with ease.

But, sure. The SEC just schedules cupcakes and, since everyone is biased towards the SEC, that's why they get a team in the national title game every year.


I don't think anyone disagrees with LSU's rank and the toughness of their schedule. If you look at Alabama and Arkansas' schedule though, I'm not really sure it's much better than the other teams in the top 10 that you mentioned.

Alabama: Kent State, Penn State, North Texas, Arkansas, Florida, Vanderbilt, Ole Miss, Tennessee, LSU, Mississippi State, Georgia Southern, Auburn

The two best wins on there are Penn State and Arkansas (more on them in a bit). Everyone seems to be hanging their #2 ranking onto the fact that they played LSU close. Beating Auburn today would give them wins over 3 ranked teams (Florida was ranked when they beat them but really, they got exposed).

Arkansas: Missouri State, New Mexico, Troy, Alabama, Texas A&M, Auburn, Ole Miss, Vanderbilt, South Carolina, Tennessee, Mississippi State, LSU

Two ranked wins on there (Auburn, South Carolina). Not terrible by any means, and certainly better than some of the other higher-ranked teams, but I don't see much that justified their #3 ranking or made them "clearly" stand out from other teams in the top 10.

I don't have much issue with Alabama/Arkansas being in the top 10, it's just the notion that Alabama is "clearly" the 2nd best team in the country, and the fact that losing to LSU is going to give them an easy path to the national title game (since they don't have to play the conference championship game).
 
2011-11-26 09:37:52 AM
If Alabama and LSU match up for the national championship, would the SEC get a third team in the BCS bowl? Ark or GA to the Sugar bowl perhaps?

Who gets a shot at LSU if Bama doesn't go? OK State? Stanford?
 
2011-11-26 09:42:45 AM
YouWinAgainGravity: I'm not really sure it's much better than the other teams in the top 10 that you mentioned.

To be clear, I am not (and have not in the past) made the argument that the SEC plays a tougher schedule year in and year out. I'm saying that people who admonish the SEC for their scheduling haven't looked to see what everyone else plays. College football schedules for the big teams are filled with 2 clearly inferior teams that are in it for the 6 figure show-up and get killed fee, 3-4 games against the crappy conference teams they get to play, 4-5 games against the average or above average conference teams they get to play, and 1-3 games against decent opponents. If they go 3-0 in their "tough" games, then they are in the national title picture.

As for Arkansas' rank, they were that high because they had only lost to Alabama and every other team in existence found a way to throw away one or two games.

YouWinAgainGravity: I don't have much issue with Alabama/Arkansas being in the top 10, it's just the notion that Alabama is "clearly" the 2nd best team in the country, and the fact that losing to LSU is going to give them an easy path to the national title game (since they don't have to play the conference championship game).

The only reason they are "clearly" the 2nd best team in the nation is because every other team that had a chance to be the #2 threw it away by losing some crap-ass game. Stanford, Oregon, OKST, and Oklahoma would've "clearly" been the #2 best team in the nation if they found a way to beat whatever retarded team they lost to. Oregon could've (and should've) run the table and they'd be in the same position as Alabama. Their one loss would be to LSU and everyone would say that Oregon is the #2 ranked team. And, I don't think very many people would be too upset about a rematch in the title game (at least not as upset as Alabama getting a rematch).

Also, I think it is retarded that Alabama has the ability to go to the title game without winning (or playing) in their conference title game. I was rooting for Arkansas, Auburn wins and then a Georgia upset just so the BCS could cry in their sleep about TWO non-conference winning teams playing in the title game.
 
2011-11-26 09:46:25 AM
Devo: If Alabama and LSU match up for the national championship, would the SEC get a third team in the BCS bowl? Ark or GA to the Sugar bowl perhaps?

Who gets a shot at LSU if Bama doesn't go? OK State? Stanford?


I think there is a two-conference limit for teams going to BCS games. However, I think there is something funky with how the title game works out if there are too many conference teams.

If Georgia wins the SEC championship, then they damn well better get to go to the Sugar bowl. But, if/when they lose, I see no reason for them to go to a BCS game. And, Arkansas shouldn't get to go anyway.

At this point, I'm assuming that...even with wins in their next few games...OKST and Virginia Tech can't leapfrog Alabama. But, those are the two teams that are next in line for LSU if Alabama stumbles today.
 
2011-11-26 09:50:33 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


Nice going, SEC troll.
 
2011-11-26 09:52:47 AM
bhcompy: PowerSlacker: LSU thrashes Arkansas, proving once again that LSU is the best conference in college football

fixed for subby


LSU is in a world of their own. Give them the damn crystal football and let Alabama and Oklahoma State play for second place.

Maybe, maybe not. Miles hasn't had too many opportunities to lose a game yet with his wackyass playcalling, but it will happen.


What's so wackyass about 'alright we're gonna run it, try and stop us'?
 
2011-11-26 09:53:01 AM
bulldg4life: To be clear, I am not (and have not in the past) made the argument that the SEC plays a tougher schedule year in and year out. I'm saying that people who admonish the SEC for their scheduling haven't looked to see what everyone else plays. College football schedules for the big teams are filled with 2 clearly inferior teams that are in it for the 6 figure show-up and get killed fee, 3-4 games against the crappy conference teams they get to play, 4-5 games against the average or above average conference teams they get to play, and 1-3 games against decent opponents. If they go 3-0 in their "tough" games, then they are in the national title picture.

Yeah I've seen plenty of SEC teams with good OOC matchups so I don't think they schedule any weaker than anyone else. I agree, that's a bad argument. I do think there is a little bit of bias when it comes to the polls for certain conferences including the SEC, but hey that's what happens when you win the national title 5 years in a row.

bulldg4life: I think there is a two-conference limit for teams going to BCS games. However, I think there is something funky with how the title game works out if there are too many conference teams.

Yeah there's a specific clause in the BCS that allows for 3 teams to go. If UGA wins the conference, they're in the Sugar Bowl no matter what and the title game could still have LSU and Alabama if they are 1 and 2. I'm not sure how they interpret it if say LSU wins the conference and goes to the title game along with Alabama. I think the 2 team limit comes into play when making at-large selections, but the BCS has never had this situation before with 2 teams in the title game from the same conference, so we'll see. Automatic berths will never get excluded though.
 
2011-11-26 09:55:59 AM
Remember how everyone was up in arms about a rematch between Ohio State and Michigan? I think the same situation exists here, which all but insures a non-Alabama participant (should LSU lose next week, that is).
 
2011-11-26 09:56:45 AM
fireside68: Remember how everyone was up in arms about a rematch between Ohio State and Michigan? I think the same situation exists here, which all but insures a non-Alabama participant (should LSU lose next week, that is).

Win, not lose. Stupid hangover.
 
2011-11-26 10:00:30 AM
I'm pretty annoyed at Virginia Tech's options right now. Assuming they beat UVA and Clemson, they go to the Orange Bowl for a matchup against the Big Least for a game nobody cares about. If they lose to UVA or Clemson, they go to the Chick-Fil-A bowl against some probably 7-5 SEC team (because the contract selections for that bowl are terrible) and get no credit at all if they win. If the stars align and they make it to the national title game, they more than likely get rolled by 40 points.
 
2011-11-26 10:14:32 AM
LSU has proved one thing as far as the confrence goes. They deserve to represent the West in the SEC title game. If they win that then we can start talking National Title shot.
 
2011-11-26 10:26:17 AM
At some point I just hope people realize that, despite how good their defense is, the pathetic performance Alabama's offense had against LSU should preclude them from a title shot. They lost and looked bad doing so. Why should they get a second chance?
 
2011-11-26 10:36:17 AM
SharkTrager: At some point I just hope people realize that, despite how good their defense is, the pathetic performance Alabama's offense had against LSU should preclude them from a title shot. They lost and looked bad doing so. Why should they get a second chance?

Becaus S! E! C! S! E! C!
 
2011-11-26 10:45:14 AM
Why Would I Read the Article: the SEC has one of the best racket's around. Between the 4 division-2 (FCS) teams they all play every year, as well as the dregs of the dregs from their own conference, all they have to do is usually beat 1 good team per year, and they're guaranteed a spot in the national championship game.

Alabama has had one tough game all year, and they lost it, yet there's an extremely good chanve they'll still end up in the national championship game. Ditto Arkansas, whose only played two real teams all year, and lost to both of them, yet still almost ended up in the title game.

The SEC is the best self-fulfilling prophechy there is. Hey, we all play four Division II games per year, but it's ok because the rest of the year is SEC games. And SEC games are the toughest; we know because they only play other SEC teams, and SEC games are the toughest, because SEC teams said so.

In summation, fark the SEC, and all their hillbilly fans.


ITT: People that haven't seen Georgia's schedule and like to make things up based on sweeping generalizations.

I'm not an LSU fan but they're clearly the best team in the country. Get over it.
 
2011-11-26 10:47:01 AM
So if UGA loses the Conference Title game, and Bama loses to Auburn today, does that give Arkansas any shot at a BCS game or are we going to have to settle for the Capital One or Cotton Bowl?

/not against going to Dallas
//Hell, I would be happy with the Liberty Bowl
 
2011-11-26 10:47:40 AM
 
2011-11-26 10:48:08 AM
forteblast: You mean like when they gave the 18-0 Patriots the Super Bowl?

This is not that. Not at all like that.
 
2011-11-26 10:54:06 AM
Aar1012: SharkTrager: At some point I just hope people realize that, despite how good their defense is, the pathetic performance Alabama's offense had against LSU should preclude them from a title shot. They lost and looked bad doing so. Why should they get a second chance?

Becaus S! E! C! S! E! C!


I want to see it because it would make the best game. The only other viable options are Oklahoma State, Virginia Tech, and Stanford. Any of those options would end up similarly to the game yesterday with LSU blowing them out. Additionally Alabama is better than any of those three and the only team that has a legitimate shot at beating LSU. Would you rather watch a blowout national championship game or a tight battle? Me, I'd rather see a hard-fought game that is actually a contest, which is why I want it to be LSU/Alabama.
 
Displayed 50 of 117 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »