If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MSNBC) Asinine Dear GOP, you pay us $850,000 and we'll undermine OWS. Sincerely, a bunch of lobbyists   (openchannel.msnbc.msn.com) divider line 407
More: Asinine, Occupy Wall Street, Anita Dunn, lobbyists  
•       •       •

5219 clicks; posted to Politics » on 19 Nov 2011 at 1:25 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



407 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-19 12:47:47 PM
Dogs of war and men of hate
With no cause, we don't discriminate
Discovery is to be disowned
Our currency is flesh and bone

Hell opened up and put on sale
Gather 'round and haggle
For hard cash, we will lie and deceive
Even our masters don't know the webs we weave
 
2011-11-19 12:54:42 PM
Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.
 
2011-11-19 12:57:19 PM
GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

considering that they weren't supposed to last this long in the first place, I'd say that they're exceeding expectations.
 
2011-11-19 01:00:32 PM
Weaver95: GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

considering that they weren't supposed to last this long in the first place, I'd say that they're exceeding expectations.


What, precisely, are these expectations? Anything to do with the fall of Capitalism?
 
2011-11-19 01:01:45 PM
ITT:
Weaver and Gary discussing exactly what they have said in the past 500 OWS threads.
 
2011-11-19 01:04:32 PM
Forget the lawyers, we need to kill all lobbyists first.
 
2011-11-19 01:05:18 PM
GaryPDX:
What, precisely, are these expectations? Anything to do with the fall of Capitalism?


oh capitalism is busy ripping itself apart all on its own...and you can thank the fine folks over at Bank of America and Goldman-Sachs for that little fact of life.

No, the OWS folks wanted to get people talking about how wall street does business. and in that respect, they've succeeded beyond their wildest expectations.
 
2011-11-19 01:06:52 PM
Is this really much different than Soros funding OWS?
 
2011-11-19 01:08:35 PM
Mugato: Forget the lawyers, we need to kill all lobbyists first.

no, they're just doing their jobs. we might find it despicable...but they aren't doing anything illegal.

what needs to change isn't lobbyists. they're going to be with us for as long as we have any form of government. What needs to change is how we handle money and congress. the way these guys get paid is via 'soft money'. the big parties can move that money around anyway they want and it's virtually untraceable. Fix that problem and make it all accoutable and you'll have a better idea of who's paying off whom to do political hatchet jobs on their opposition.
 
2011-11-19 01:11:00 PM
Weaver95: GaryPDX:
What, precisely, are these expectations? Anything to do with the fall of Capitalism?

oh capitalism is busy ripping itself apart all on its own...and you can thank the fine folks over at Bank of America and Goldman-Sachs for that little fact of life.

No, the OWS folks wanted to get people talking about how wall street does business. and in that respect, they've succeeded beyond their wildest expectations.


Oh Capitalism will be fine once it is allowed to clean up after itself. What we have is few modern day Robber Barons on Wall Street in bed with this administration and it's protection. There's no such thing as "too big to fail" in Capitalism. Capitalism was suspended a few years ago and now that's what is failing.
 
2011-11-19 01:15:52 PM
GaryPDX: Weaver95: GaryPDX:
What, precisely, are these expectations? Anything to do with the fall of Capitalism?

oh capitalism is busy ripping itself apart all on its own...and you can thank the fine folks over at Bank of America and Goldman-Sachs for that little fact of life.

No, the OWS folks wanted to get people talking about how wall street does business. and in that respect, they've succeeded beyond their wildest expectations.

Oh Capitalism will be fine once it is allowed to clean up after itself. What we have is few modern day Robber Barons on Wall Street in bed with this administration and it's protection. There's no such thing as "too big to fail" in Capitalism. Capitalism was suspended a few years ago and now that's what is failing.


"This administration?"

You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?
 
2011-11-19 01:17:26 PM
2wolves: You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?

Because he's NOT better than canned derp?
 
2011-11-19 01:17:40 PM
They will take and you will give,
And you must die so that they may live


To carry on with the initial comment...
 
2011-11-19 01:19:51 PM
GaryPDX: Oh Capitalism will be fine once it is allowed to clean up after itself. What we have is few modern day Robber Barons on Wall Street in bed with this administration and it's protection. There's no such thing as "too big to fail" in Capitalism. Capitalism was suspended a few years ago and now that's what is failing.

If it were up to me i'd use a little more Machiavelli and less Ayn Rand in how I'd approach regulating wall street. I'd make banks and CEOs fear any investigation. I'd make the rules clear, and I'd make sure they all knew that if they stepped out of line it would hurt them. Not their companies mind you...I'd hurt them personally. A CEO drives his company into the ground, i'd bankrupt him and mandate by law that he can't ever work as an officer in a corporation ever again. I don't even care HOW the company implodes either. His fault...not his fault....company goes under, the CEO is barred from being a corporate officer for...hmm...lets say 20 years. And no golden parachute nonsense. There would be a mandatory investigation and heavy fines would likely be assessed. Even the hint of impropriety would put our theoretical CEO into a jail cell for a time.

But that's just me. I think that if you're gonna play the game at that level then the risk should balance out the reward. By all means...make more money than God. But if you fail....then your lose it all.
 
2011-11-19 01:20:15 PM
robmilmel: 2wolves: You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?

Because he's NOT better than canned derp?


He can be. He like to stir up sh*t, but damn, this country is an overflowing cesspool tsunami right now.
 
2011-11-19 01:20:41 PM
2wolves: They will take and you will give,
And you must die so that they may live

To carry on with the initial comment...


I read the article and that song came back to me...it just seemed appropriate somehow.
 
2011-11-19 01:21:11 PM
2wolves: "This administration?"

You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?


Yes. Geithner and Bernanke do whatever Wall Street wants them to do. And if you believe Wall Street is a closed hive of Republicans, I got a bride to sell ya. Most people on Wall Street are Ivy League wanks. Hardly a Conservative crowd.
 
2011-11-19 01:24:53 PM
GaryPDX: 2wolves: "This administration?"

You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?

Yes. Geithner and Bernanke do whatever Wall Street wants them to do. And if you believe Wall Street is a closed hive of Republicans, I got a bride to sell ya. Most people on Wall Street are Ivy League wanks. Hardly a Conservative crowd.


They're not liberals or progressives either. They're thieves gaming a system for personal gain at the expense of the country that they live in.
 
2011-11-19 01:26:26 PM
2wolves: They're not liberals or progressives either. They're thieves gaming a system for personal gain at the expense of the country that they live in.

And then the lie and tell everyone that theft is capitalism and that if you decide you'd rather not be robbed, then you're a commie bastard.

its nuts. And I honestly don't know what to make of any of it.
 
2011-11-19 01:26:41 PM
2wolves: They're not liberals or progressives either. They're thieves gaming a system for personal gain at the expense of the country that they live in.

As I said, modern day Robber Barons.
 
2011-11-19 01:27:47 PM
GaryPDX: And if you believe Wall Street is a closed hive of Republicans, I got a bride to sell ya.

It's hard out there for a pimp.
 
2011-11-19 01:27:59 PM
GaryPDX: 2wolves: They're not liberals or progressives either. They're thieves gaming a system for personal gain at the expense of the country that they live in.

As I said, modern day Robber Barons.


with a side order of neo-feudalism.
 
2011-11-19 01:28:09 PM
Mugato: Forget the lawyers, we need to kill all lobbyists first.

There it is...

I would bet a significant sum that mugato is a progressive OWS supporter.
 
2011-11-19 01:28:34 PM
Show us your Marx: ITT:
Weaver and Gary discussing exactly what they have said in the past 500 OWS threads.
 
2011-11-19 01:31:15 PM
2wolves:

They're not liberals or progressives either. They're thieves gaming a system for personal gain at the expense of the country that they live in.


I do think that when it comes to spending their lobbying dollars, the Republican values are more amenable to helping them game the system, so the dollars go there.
 
2011-11-19 01:31:52 PM
couchgnome: Mugato: Forget the lawyers, we need to kill all lobbyists first.

There it is...

I would bet a significant sum that mugato is a progressive OWS supporter.


he's paraphrasing Shakespear.

ALL
God save your majesty!

CADE
I thank you, good people: there shall be no money;
all shall eat and drink on my score; and I will
apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree
like brothers and worship me their lord.

DICK
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.

CADE
Nay, that I mean to do. Is not this a lamentable
thing, that of the skin of an innocent lamb should
be made parchment? that parchment, being scribbled
o'er, should undo a man? Some say the bee stings:
but I say, 'tis the bee's wax; for I did but seal
once to a thing, and I was never mine own man
since. How now! who's there?

Henry VI, part 2. Act 4, scene 2.
 
2011-11-19 01:32:05 PM
real shaman: Is this really much different than Soros funding OWS?

images4.fanpop.com
 
2011-11-19 01:32:27 PM
GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

So is this where you claim that OWS is irrelevant, that nobody is afraid of it or paying attention to it, despite the fact that a bunch of lobbyist are devising a plan to destroy it and you are taking time out of your day to post negative comments in a thread about it?
 
2011-11-19 01:34:42 PM
GaryPDX: 2wolves: "This administration?"

You're better than that Gary. Why are you playing that role?

Yes. Geithner and Bernanke do whatever Wall Street wants them to do. And if you believe Wall Street is a closed hive of Republicans, I got a bride to sell ya. Most people on Wall Street are Ivy League wanks. Hardly a Conservative crowd.


See im not looking for a bride, per se. However I am very interested in a derivative based on the trading of a bride backed security vehicle/product.
 
2011-11-19 01:38:24 PM
Weaver95: couchgnome: Mugato: Forget the lawyers, we need to kill all lobbyists first.

There it is...

I would bet a significant sum that mugato is a progressive OWS supporter.

he's paraphrasing Shakespear.

ALL
God save your majesty!

CADE
I thank you, good people: there shall be no money;
all shall eat and drink on my score; and I will
apparel them all in one livery, that they may agree
like brothers and worship me their lord.

DICK
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.

CADE
Nay, that I mean to do. Is not this a lamentable
thing, that of the skin of an innocent lamb should
be made parchment? that parchment, being scribbled
o'er, should undo a man? Some say the bee stings:
but I say, 'tis the bee's wax; for I did but seal
once to a thing, and I was never mine own man
since. How now! who's there?

Henry VI, part 2. Act 4, scene 2.


Absolutely.
It is that he was paraphrasing that particular line in this particular context (this thread and what he himself said) that I am commenting on.

He obviously said it for a reason.
Or this is actually a thread about shakespear and I misreads the headline.....
 
2011-11-19 01:38:54 PM
According to the memo, if Democrats embrace OWS, "This would mean more than just short-term political discomfort for Wall Street. ... It has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye."

The memo also suggests that Democratic victories in 2012 should not be the ABA's biggest concern. "... (T)he bigger concern," the memo says, "should be that Republicans will no longer defend Wall Street companies."


I mean, I know a lot of Democrats are in bed with Wall Street, too, but these lobbyists are just calling a spade a spade.

Paraphrasing Alan Grayson, the problem is there are two parties, one that caters to Wall Street, and the other which is a fully acquired subsidiary of Wall street.
 
2011-11-19 01:39:12 PM
Weaver95: And then the lie and tell everyone that theft is capitalism and that if you decide you'd rather not be robbed, then you're a commie bastard.

There's a whole lot of confusion in that right there. Capitalism is not theft, theft is theft. And it's not the notion of folks would rather not be robbed that's Communistic, it's the notion the government should run everything.

I think we all can agree we loathe corruption no matter who is perpetuating it. Personally, I'd rather the government NOT run everything because we all know what power does, it corrupts, absolutely.
 
2011-11-19 01:40:04 PM
2wolves: You're better than that Gary.

Hahaha what?
 
2011-11-19 01:40:12 PM
Tarl3k: real shaman: Is this really much different than Soros funding OWS?

[images4.fanpop.com image 640x433]


Why?

I think it is a very good question.

How is it different?
 
2011-11-19 01:42:08 PM
couchgnome: He obviously said it for a reason.
Or this is actually a thread about shakespear and I misreads the headline.....


The Moor is of a free and open nature,
That thinks men honest that but seem to be so,
And will as tenderly be led by the nose
As asses are.

Iago, Othello. Act I, scene III
 
2011-11-19 01:44:56 PM
Odd, I've been reading through Henry VI lately. Part I really sucked.
 
2011-11-19 01:47:03 PM
ongbok: GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

So is this where you claim that OWS is irrelevant, that nobody is afraid of it or paying attention to it, despite the fact that a bunch of lobbyist are devising a plan to destroy it and you are taking time out of your day to post negative comments in a thread about it?


It reminds me of the 60's. Damn the Man! Don't trust anyone over 30! Groovy! PIGS! Communes with tents! Dope smoking...lol.
 
2011-11-19 01:47:16 PM
Weaver95: couchgnome: He obviously said it for a reason.
Or this is actually a thread about shakespear and I misreads the headline.....

The Moor is of a free and open nature,
That thinks men honest that but seem to be so,
And will as tenderly be led by the nose
As asses are.

Iago, Othello. Act I, scene III


"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar"
Sigmund Freud
 
2011-11-19 01:48:30 PM
Weaver95: Dogs of war and men of hate
With no cause, we don't discriminate
Discovery is to be disowned
Our currency is flesh and bone

Hell opened up and put on sale
Gather 'round and haggle
For hard cash, we will lie and deceive
Even our masters don't know the webs we weave


Credit to David Gilmour, Anthony Moore for writing these fantastic lyrics back when I was a 19 year old kid.
Saw Pink Floyd live with 100,000 people in JFK stadium in '87. Concerts just don't get that big anymore.
 
2011-11-19 01:49:08 PM
couchgnome: Weaver95: couchgnome: He obviously said it for a reason.
Or this is actually a thread about shakespear and I misreads the headline.....

The Moor is of a free and open nature,
That thinks men honest that but seem to be so,
And will as tenderly be led by the nose
As asses are.

Iago, Othello. Act I, scene III

"Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar"
Sigmund Freud


"A sucker is born every minute"
PT Barnum
 
2011-11-19 01:49:50 PM
Weaver95: The Moor

You mean Fartbongo?
 
2011-11-19 01:52:19 PM
couchgnome: Tarl3k: real shaman: Is this really much different than Soros funding OWS?

[images4.fanpop.com image 640x433]

Why?

I think it is a very good question.

How is it different
?


No, it's actually a really stupid question. It's like asking is Tonya Harding really that much different from any other of Nancy Kerrigan's competitors? They all just wanted to win!

sharing.myfoxphoenix.com
 
2011-11-19 01:53:16 PM
Given that this came from a long established and well entrenched K-street lobby shop the only thing being revealed here is the remarkable, groundbreaking news that successful lobbyists tend to be aggressive, proactive marketers of their services. The memo is in the finest tradition of 'Always Be Closing'. In the world of lobbyists, the only thing better than finding a customer with a genuine crisis to be solved is inventing a crisis for them to worry about, thus requiring your expensive services. This one was targeted for The American Bankers Association. It proposed doing opposition research on OWS movement leaders and pushing a media campaign to portray them in a negative light, while attacking Democrats who have already lent their support to the protesters.

Also, the association in question responded to MSNBC saying they had received the memo, it was unsolicited and they chose not to act on it in any way.

This is news? Or, is it less news than something to gin up some buzz to attract viewers (read: ratings) for a new MSDNC show?

static.neatoshop.com
 
2011-11-19 01:53:35 PM
Here's the story of a brother by the name of Othello.
He liked white women and he liked...green Jello.
 
2011-11-19 01:55:27 PM
GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

Just curious why it is that you support the 1%. Surely you aren't one and therefore have no more to gain by supporting them than anyone else who isn't. You just trollin'?
 
2011-11-19 01:56:29 PM
GaryPDX: Oh Capitalism will be fine once it is allowed to clean up after itself. What we have is few modern day Robber Barons on Wall Street in bed with this administration and it's protection.

well at least this administration is so busy bedding wall street robber barons that they've completely forgotten they're actually sekret muslin communists.
 
2011-11-19 01:56:47 PM
GaryPDX: ongbok: GaryPDX: Save your money. They're doing a fine job of imploding themselves.

So is this where you claim that OWS is irrelevant, that nobody is afraid of it or paying attention to it, despite the fact that a bunch of lobbyist are devising a plan to destroy it and you are taking time out of your day to post negative comments in a thread about it?

It reminds me of the 60's. Damn the Man! Don't trust anyone over 30! Groovy! PIGS! Communes with tents! Dope smoking...lol.


Gary maybe you should go occupy something for the release of Shawna Forde.
 
2011-11-19 01:56:59 PM
Demetrius: Here's the story of a brother by the name of Othello.
He liked white women and he liked...green Jello.


There was a young woman from Durat
The cheeks of whose arse was so fat
they had to be parted
whenever she farted
and also whenever she shat.
 
2011-11-19 01:58:25 PM
whitman00: Weaver95: Dogs of war and men of hate
With no cause, we don't discriminate
Discovery is to be disowned
Our currency is flesh and bone

Hell opened up and put on sale
Gather 'round and haggle
For hard cash, we will lie and deceive
Even our masters don't know the webs we weave

Credit to David Gilmour, Anthony Moore for writing these fantastic lyrics back when I was a 19 year old kid.
Saw Pink Floyd live with 100,000 people in JFK stadium in '87. Concerts just don't get that big anymore.



You don't have to be a Jew
To disapprove of murder
Tears burn our eyes
Moslem or Christian Mullah or Pope
Preacher or poet who was it wrote
Give any one species too much rope
And they'll fark it up

Roger Waters, Amused to Death

I think I have every version of every thing Floyd or Waters has ever done.
 
2011-11-19 01:59:09 PM
lennavan: couchgnome: Tarl3k: real shaman: Is this really much different than Soros funding OWS?

[images4.fanpop.com image 640x433]

Why?

I think it is a very good question.

How is it different?

No, it's actually a really stupid question. It's like asking is Tonya Harding really that much different from any other of Nancy Kerrigan's competitors? They all just wanted to win!

[sharing.myfoxphoenix.com image 320x240]


Huh?

no wait...seriously...

HUH?
 
Displayed 50 of 407 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »