If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Washington Post) Scary Malicious cyber attack by foreign hackers (looking at you Russia) that targeted a water plant in Illinois appears to be the first of its kind on a critical computer system in the United States   (washingtonpost.com) divider line 92
More: Scary, United States, Illinois, cyber-attack, critical infrastructure, water district, critical system, RSA, Reporter of Decisions  
•       •       •

7219 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Nov 2011 at 6:50 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



92 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-18 04:46:35 PM
so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?
 
2011-11-18 04:50:21 PM
What city? C'mon, I live in Illinois! I don't need any commie water!
 
2011-11-18 04:53:29 PM
Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?


I'm trying to remember the article I read the other day saying the Pentagon was ready for any attack and would fightback with their own cyber warfare.

here's a related article
 
2011-11-18 04:55:36 PM
olddeegee: What city? C'mon, I live in Illinois! I don't need any commie water!

The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that a water plant in Springfield, Ill. had been damaged
 
2011-11-18 05:05:12 PM
AlwaysRightBoy: olddeegee: What city? C'mon, I live in Illinois! I don't need any commie water!

The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that a water plant in Springfield, Ill. had been damaged


That's OK. They're all slack-jawed yokels down there anyway.
i48.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-18 05:09:11 PM
AlwaysRightBoy: olddeegee: What city? C'mon, I live in Illinois! I don't need any commie water!

The Department of Homeland Security confirmed that a water plant in Springfield, Ill. had been damaged


If it's brown, drink it down; if it's black, throw it back.
 
2011-11-18 05:35:07 PM
"This is a big deal," said Weiss.

i843.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-18 05:40:27 PM
You should look due south of Russia, subs. No, no, not Mongolia, keep going... Yeah, that's the one.

I'm starting to feel like we're actually at war with the Chinese, but that no one wants to talk about it.
 
2011-11-18 06:11:27 PM
AlwaysRightBoy: Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?

I'm trying to remember the article I read the other day saying the Pentagon was ready for any attack and would fightback with their own cyber warfare.


That makes the assumption that the attack is launched by a country, and not by an individual or an extraterritorial group. What you're talking about is pretty 20th century thinking. How do you retaliate? And against whom? Are you gonna carpet bomb the cybercafe in some Shanghai suburb in the hopes of getting the little rat bastard?
 
2011-11-18 06:36:40 PM
timujin: You should look due south of Russia, subs. No, no, not Mongolia, keep going... Yeah, that's the one.

I'm starting to feel like we're actually at war with the Chinese, but that no one wants to talk about it.


It could be anyone from Russia, China or even North Korea... or some script kiddie from Vermont.
 
2011-11-18 06:43:33 PM
Tr0mBoNe: timujin: You should look due south of Russia, subs. No, no, not Mongolia, keep going... Yeah, that's the one.

I'm starting to feel like we're actually at war with the Chinese, but that no one wants to talk about it.

It could be anyone from Russia, China or even North Korea... or some script kiddie from Vermont.


yeah, in this case it could have been a lot of different folks, though the attack came from "a computer located in Russia." Still, between things like Los Alamos, the RSA issue and, um.. "other things" it seems as bad as it was between Russia and the U.S. during the Cold War.
 
2011-11-18 06:53:42 PM
www.quantrimang.com.vn
"Uh... da, comrade. Russian. You've got us."
 
2011-11-18 06:54:34 PM
And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?
 
2011-11-18 06:56:55 PM
Theaetetus: [www.quantrimang.com.vn image 640x425]
"Uh... da, comrade. Russian. You've got us."


It looks like they're playing Warcraft 3.
 
2011-11-18 06:57:25 PM
bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

So that they can be accessed by a super-cool mobile web interface! duh.
 
2011-11-18 06:57:58 PM
It might be "The Crash Entity", though it is has shown up 18 years early.
 
2011-11-18 06:59:56 PM
Were there no lessons learned from Pearl Harbor and 9/11?

It's still kind of a stupid idea to fark with us, y'know.
 
2011-11-18 07:00:17 PM
bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

Ten billion farking times THIS

Tell the fat fark working the control console that no, he doesn't get to work from home. Get his lazy ass in front of a non-network-connected terminal, or find somebody else to do his job.
 
2011-11-18 07:01:37 PM
Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?


Maybe them commies are smoking that ebil marijewanna, then the DEA can put all their high tech weaponry to good use and shut....them...down....
 
2011-11-18 07:01:39 PM
Yep. Putting valuable operation information on the Web:

Not the best idea.

Although someone must think it is. Let's see.
 
2011-11-18 07:01:51 PM
bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

A +1 to you!

For the same reason that anything is connected to the internet...."it's convenient, and what's the worst that could happen?"
 
2011-11-18 07:02:48 PM
This attack cannot be directly attributed to Russia simply because it originated from Russia.

If that's all it takes, someone can make it look like a library in Kentucky did it.
 
2011-11-18 07:02:54 PM
Homer Simpson Wanted for Questioning... Or the Mexicans...
 
2011-11-18 07:03:06 PM
DontMakeMeComeBackThere: Tell the fat fark working the control console that no, he doesn't get to work from home. Get his lazy ass in front of a non-network-connected terminal, or find somebody else to do his job.

i.imgur.com

Wanted for questioning.
 
2011-11-18 07:04:55 PM
unyon: AlwaysRightBoy: Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?

I'm trying to remember the article I read the other day saying the Pentagon was ready for any attack and would fightback with their own cyber warfare.

That makes the assumption that the attack is launched by a country, and not by an individual or an extraterritorial group. What you're talking about is pretty 20th century thinking. How do you retaliate? And against whom? Are you gonna carpet bomb the cybercafe in some Shanghai suburb in the hopes of getting the little rat bastard?


Stupid frickin' aliens. First anal probes not computer probes!


/yes, yes. I know.
 
2011-11-18 07:05:15 PM
OHHHH SNAP GOTCHA biatch~ and you forgot the good for nuttin mexican'ts. High five to you though.
 
2011-11-18 07:07:26 PM
jutm543: Theaetetus: [www.quantrimang.com.vn image 640x425]
"Uh... da, comrade. Russian. You've got us."

It looks like they're playing Warcraft 3.


Looks more like Starcraft to me.
 
2011-11-18 07:08:55 PM
unyon: AlwaysRightBoy: Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?

I'm trying to remember the article I read the other day saying the Pentagon was ready for any attack and would fightback with their own cyber warfare.

That makes the assumption that the attack is launched by a country, and not by an individual or an extraterritorial group. What you're talking about is pretty 20th century thinking. How do you retaliate? And against whom? Are you gonna carpet bomb the cybercafe in some Shanghai suburb in the hopes of getting the little rat bastard?


Good point. The article that I can't find was more about the Pentagon being on top of cbyer attacks.
 
2011-11-18 07:09:23 PM
...why the fark was the control network taking traffic from the internet in the first place? Who designed that shiat?
 
2011-11-18 07:13:12 PM
Fjornir: ...why the fark was the control network taking traffic from the internet in the first place? Who designed that shiat?

Maybe this idea is draconian in this modern connected age, but honestly control systems for major agencies, utilites, and whatevers need to be on closed circuits.
 
2011-11-18 07:14:12 PM
Russia? More like China. It always ends up being the Chinese when it comes to cybersecurity threats.
Damn Triads.
 
2011-11-18 07:14:21 PM
bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

This is the question that people should be asking. It's not likely the controls were directly hooked up to a machine with an external facing IP. Rather, the computer terminal that had the SCADA controls on its screen was on a LAN, and the LAN was accessible through a VPN appliance which was not adequately monitored for suspicous traffic, and it allowed these guys to take their time and find a way in through brute force or password guessing. Hard shell with a soft center.

In any case, there are some computers that simply should not be connected to a common unsecure network, because some of the critical systems that run on those computers were never designed with remote access controls in mind.

Hopefully this will send the message to utility companies that they need better network security oversight.
 
2011-11-18 07:15:41 PM
Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?


.....
We might all just end up livin' in a van, down by the river.
 
2011-11-18 07:18:06 PM
bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

There are a couple of good reasons:
1. You can set up a modern PLC to email you when something goes awry, say the main pump on your potable water supply goes dead.
2. You can otherwise monitor the systems remotely. It may not be down, but you might want to see if it's working as expected.
3. Maybe it requires a reboot, and you can either get up, get dressed, drive to the far end of the reservoir, kick the machine, and then go back to bed.

I'm not sure why you couldn't send all these signals to a remote PC in a DMZ, and connect to that PC. Hell, put in some diodes so it's really read-only. You couldn't reboot though.
 
2011-11-18 07:20:19 PM
SN1987a goes boom: Fjornir: ...why the fark was the control network taking traffic from the internet in the first place? Who designed that shiat?

Maybe this idea is draconian in this modern connected age, but honestly control systems for major agencies, utilites, and whatevers need to be on closed circuits.


Has nobody seen Die Hard 4? Even I'm a Mac knows this!!
 
2011-11-18 07:20:44 PM
SN1987a goes boom: Maybe this idea is draconian in this modern connected age, but honestly control systems for major agencies, utilites, and whatevers need to be on closed circuits.

That's not draconian that is "good engineering design."

Data flow from the control network to the business network should be done over a unidirectional pipe. Data flow from the business network to the control network should require physical access.
 
2011-11-18 07:21:15 PM
Fjornir: ...why the fark was the control network taking traffic from the internet in the first place? Who designed that shiat?

My guess is nobody designed it and that's why it existed. The old school system controls guy did his little piece - getting the serial interface to work on a terminal screen (9600/8-N-1) on a PC. The local network guy did his little piece - connecting the PC to the network in order to keep it patched and scanned for viruses, and probably to make it easier to manage; no VLANs were configured. The network security guy did his little piece - installing a VPN appliance to make it easier for staff to work at home, probably at the behest of management. Nobody took a look at the full picture, or if they did, management didn't see it as a priority. This is the story at many companies of all sizes that are responsible for all sorts of critical systems or processes.
 
2011-11-18 07:24:43 PM
wagnerism: This attack cannot be directly attributed to Russia simply because it originated from Russia.

If that's all it takes, someone can make it look like a library in Kentucky did it.


or some dickhead amateur hacker that lives in russia found a vulnerability there and did it for lulz
 
2011-11-18 07:25:40 PM
timujin: Tr0mBoNe: timujin: You should look due south of Russia, subs. No, no, not Mongolia, keep going... Yeah, that's the one.

I'm starting to feel like we're actually at war with the Chinese, but that no one wants to talk about it.

It could be anyone from Russia, China or even North Korea... or some script kiddie from Vermont.

yeah, in this case it could have been a lot of different folks, though the attack came from "a computer located in Russia." Still, between things like Los Alamos, the RSA issue and, um.. "other things" it seems as bad as it was between Russia and the U.S. during the Cold War.


cache.ohinternet.com

He could be behind more than six proxies.
 
2011-11-18 07:28:00 PM
theMagni: bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

There are a couple of good reasons:
1. You can set up a modern PLC to email you when something goes awry, say the main pump on your potable water supply goes dead.
2. You can otherwise monitor the systems remotely. It may not be down, but you might want to see if it's working as expected.
3. Maybe it requires a reboot, and you can either get up, get dressed, drive to the far end of the reservoir, kick the machine, and then go back to bed.

I'm not sure why you couldn't send all these signals to a remote PC in a DMZ, and connect to that PC. Hell, put in some diodes so it's really read-only. You couldn't reboot though.


We're talking vital systems here, they should be protected using the most secure [read least convenient] methods possible.

1. Why would it need to email you? Isn't the system vital enough to have 24hour staffing? Even if it's a mongoloid who calls someone when the red light starts flashing, there should be a person on site 24/7.
2. You want to monitor it remotely? Get a camera on a separate network.
3. fark your lazy ass, you get paid to get up and drive to the reservoir and kick the machine. Unemployment is at 9% officially and probably 15-18% unofficially, you think there aren't qualified applicants who would be willing to get up in the middle of the night.
 
2011-11-18 07:28:14 PM
I'm glad to see so many farkers realize this is probably the work of the Chinese.
 
2011-11-18 07:29:04 PM
valkore: My guess is nobody designed it and that's why it existed. The old school system controls guy did his little piece - getting the serial interface to work on a terminal screen (9600/8-N-1) on a PC. The local network guy did his little piece - connecting the PC to the network in order to keep it patched and scanned for viruses, and probably to make it easier to manage; no VLANs were configured. The network security guy did his little piece - installing a VPN appliance to make it easier for staff to work at home, probably at the behest of management. Nobody took a look at the full picture, or if they did, management didn't see it as a priority. This is the story at many companies of all sizes that are responsible for all sorts of critical systems or processes.

If that's how the interconnect got installed someone deserves to get fired for not having followed SOP0074-004 revF which forbids that sort of connection or someone else needs to be fired for not having written it into their SOP.

Also, if you're doing 8-N-1 for critical systems you're doing it wrong. Parity bit exists for a reason.
 
2011-11-18 07:30:12 PM
Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?



Wouldn't be surprised if stuff like this was somehow used as support for SOPA and PROTECT IP.
 
2011-11-18 07:36:45 PM
PluckYew: theMagni: bubo_sibiricus: And SCADA controls are connected to the Internet, why?

There are a couple of good reasons:
1. You can set up a modern PLC to email you when something goes awry, say the main pump on your potable water supply goes dead.
2. You can otherwise monitor the systems remotely. It may not be down, but you might want to see if it's working as expected.
3. Maybe it requires a reboot, and you can either get up, get dressed, drive to the far end of the reservoir, kick the machine, and then go back to bed.

I'm not sure why you couldn't send all these signals to a remote PC in a DMZ, and connect to that PC. Hell, put in some diodes so it's really read-only. You couldn't reboot though.

We're talking vital systems here, they should be protected using the most secure [read least convenient] methods possible.

1. Why would it need to email you? Isn't the system vital enough to have 24hour staffing? Even if it's a mongoloid who calls someone when the red light starts flashing, there should be a person on site 24/7.
2. You want to monitor it remotely? Get a camera on a separate network.
3. fark your lazy ass, you get paid to get up and drive to the reservoir and kick the machine. Unemployment is at 9% officially and probably 15-18% unofficially, you think there aren't qualified applicants who would be willing to get up in the middle of the night.


You're correct, if the system is important enough to email you, it's important enough to have a person watching it.

I'd also agree with the cameras, and let those be accessible online. You can even have flame detection cameras now, those are required equipment on new ship builds, for example. They may not be great at giving you flow information, and that may be what is more important to you. I would argue that remote monitoring and good data collection is important to cut waste, but getting into what you want monitored is really up to the budget.

Remote kicking ties into the first one, I think. If it's something that has to be kicked fast, then it's important enough to have a designated kicker on staff.
 
2011-11-18 07:37:28 PM
Stupid Flanders !
 
2011-11-18 07:37:34 PM
Why in the hell are critical infrastructure systems connected to the Internet?
 
2011-11-18 07:38:55 PM
So convenience is more important than security? I can't think of any reason besides laziness that they'd allow any sort of internet-based contact with a critical utility's puter system. Or maybe they're too cheap to pay a couple of employees to actually be in the building, monitoring things.

My guess that they'll just update the firewall and anti-virus, then change the password to something really tricky like "password."
 
2011-11-18 07:39:05 PM
theMagni: bubo_sibiricus:
There are a couple of
terrible reasons:
1. You can set up a modern PLC to email you when something goes awry, say the main pump on your potable water supply goes dead.
2. You can otherwise monitor the systems remotely. It may not be down, but you might want to see if it's working as expected.
3. Maybe it requires a reboot, and you can either get up, get dressed, drive to the far end of the reservoir, kick the machine, and then go back to bed.


FTFY
Monitoring System != Control System
The control system should absolutely be isolated on non-networked machines. You can have monitoring equipment connected to your hearts content. Want that alert email, or to check the system status, go for it. However actually controlling critical systems like this remotely is both foolish and dangerous. The systems that have actual, physical control over these services should never be accessible over the internet, there is no reason good enough.
 
2011-11-18 07:39:34 PM
Rip Dashrock: Weaver95: so while the Bad Guys are figuring out how to attack our critical infrastructure via web based attacks, the Dept of Homeland Security is off shutting down file trading websites and telling us all not to worry, they've got it all under control.

we're f*cking doomed, you all know that right?

Maybe them commies are smoking that ebil marijewanna, then the DEA can put all their high tech weaponry to good use and shut....them...down....


Last time I checked the DEA had a better record with the whole "homeland security" shtick than the agency with the name that says they should. So yeah, maybe.
 
2011-11-18 07:39:47 PM
I sure am glad my crazy neighbors didn't see this article........

/Is remotely turning off their 'smart power meters' a crime? oh, I see
//And those 'smart water meters' are a way to make sure they don't water outside of sprinkling times.
///Technology sure is fun.
//I'm behind 7 uninterruptable battery backups.
/Proxify and encrypt your net.
 
Displayed 50 of 92 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »