If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(St. Petersburg Times) Asinine There can be only one: 'Highlander' remake in works   (tampabay.com) divider line 105
More: Asinine, Highlander, Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, Christopher Lambert, remakes, Sean Connery, live forever  
•       •       •

3375 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 17 Nov 2011 at 12:49 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



105 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-17 12:41:28 PM
Some things should just be left alone and allowed to die. Every attempt to cash in on this since the original has been progressively worse...
 
2011-11-17 12:47:13 PM
LordZorch: Some things should just be left alone and allowed to die. Every attempt to cash in on this since the original has been progressively worse...

Came here to post this.

Hollywood & Highlander Fanboys: Just stop it.
 
2011-11-17 12:54:07 PM
NOOOOOOOOO!!!
 
2011-11-17 12:57:39 PM
I'm not even a Highlander fanboy by any stretch, yet I feel utterly insulted by this development.
 
2011-11-17 12:58:06 PM
Cut off its head. Maybe that will stop it
 
2011-11-17 12:59:06 PM
Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.
 
2011-11-17 12:59:06 PM
LLLAAAAMME!

That's like remaking Total Recall...

/wait
//morons...
 
2011-11-17 01:00:25 PM
Remade? I was hoping for the much anticipated Highlander 2 movie to be made. I always though that Highlander could be made into a reputable franchise but alas they stopped with the original.
 
2011-11-17 01:00:42 PM
LordZorch: Some things should just be left alone and allowed to die. Every attempt to cash in on this since the original has been progressively worse...
 
2011-11-17 01:02:46 PM
Apos: LordZorch: Some things should just be left alone and allowed to die. Every attempt to cash in on this since the original has been progressively worse...

Or would have been, if they went through with the plans to make sequels and a television series.

Luckily they wised up before doing so.
 
2011-11-17 01:04:05 PM
newsflash subby, that's been discussed since late 2010
 
2011-11-17 01:05:52 PM
Didn't it win an Oscar for "Best Movie Ever Made"?
 
2011-11-17 01:08:31 PM
That coward David Lopan: Didn't it win an Oscar for "Best Movie Ever Made"?

Two of em.

True story.
 
2011-11-17 01:08:49 PM
Is it really too much to ask for a new, original idea for movies and TV??
 
2011-11-17 01:12:45 PM
There's a hydra joke here somewhere. Someone please make it funny.
 
2011-11-17 01:13:00 PM
no...just no. Leave Highlander alone dammit!
 
2011-11-17 01:14:56 PM
DONT DO IT.

If you do, at least cast Ron Perlman as the Kurgan.
 
2011-11-17 01:17:57 PM
rickycal78: Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.

True, it hasn't aged well, but that doesn't mean it needs a remake. Planet of the Apes didn't age well, either, and look what that remake did to it! (The Mark Wahlberg remake, not Rise of the Planet of the Apes which is surprisingly good). Superman didn't fare well over 30 years but Superman Returns did more harm than good.

Sometimes a reboot is a good idea and is done well (See: Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, X-Men: First Class, Buffy if you count the TV series rebooting the awful movie). Other times, it's a good idea gone horribly awry (King Kong, Godzilla, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, The Pink Panther, Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, the aforementioned PotA & Superman Returns). Highlander can still chug along, despite the bad 80s hair. It doesn't need a remake OR a reboot.

If they want to reboot a new franchise, somebody greenlight the Alien prequel, already.
 
2011-11-17 01:18:47 PM
I'll never forget the review of Highlander 2:

"Sean Connery fights a bad script, and loses."
 
2011-11-17 01:23:14 PM
In this day and age of twilight, Connor will probably be some whiny 20 year old who can't fit in at the local college. Love interest will be a student journalist whom everyone thinks is crazy, and the Kurgan will be one of the professors, who just started at the school after feeling the draw of the gathering.

Shia La-paycheck, Kristen Stewart and Willem Dafoe. Toss it all in a blender, hit puree and, voila, instead shiate smoothie and fanboy wharlgarbel.
 
2011-11-17 01:25:17 PM
You can't make a new Highlander...

There can be only one.
 
2011-11-17 01:25:51 PM
LordZorch: Some things should just be left alone and allowed to die. Every attempt to cash in on this since the original has been progressively worse...

Don't be ridiculous. Highlander 3 and the TV series may not have been great but they don't even compare to the epic suckage of shiat movies that was Highlander 2.
 
2011-11-17 01:26:23 PM
Saw it, thought it sucked

images.huffingtonpost.com
 
2011-11-17 01:27:39 PM
If Ramirez is still supposed to be Egyptian, they should get this guy to play him:

images.wikia.com

He was the head terrorist in Iron Man and the captain of the Kelvin in the Star Trek movie. He's also been on Warehouse 13 a few times. I don't know, whenever I see him, I always think, "This guy is pretty good. He should be in more stuff."
 
2011-11-17 01:27:52 PM
JustSeanV67: Is it really too much to ask for a new, original idea for movies and TV??

Yes, it is. New = uncertain, old = proven.
 
2011-11-17 01:30:37 PM
brigid_fitch: rickycal78: Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.

True, it hasn't aged well, but that doesn't mean it needs a remake. Planet of the Apes didn't age well, either, and look what that remake did to it! (The Mark Wahlberg remake, not Rise of the Planet of the Apes which is surprisingly good). Superman didn't fare well over 30 years but Superman Returns did more harm than good.

Sometimes a reboot is a good idea and is done well (See: Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, X-Men: First Class, Buffy if you count the TV series rebooting the awful movie). Other times, it's a good idea gone horribly awry (King Kong, Godzilla, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, The Pink Panther, Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, the aforementioned PotA & Superman Returns). Highlander can still chug along, despite the bad 80s hair. It doesn't need a remake OR a reboot.

If they want to reboot a new franchise, somebody greenlight the Alien prequel, already.


Among many things, a good film reflects the time and the context in which it was made. Some films may seem dated today, but IMHO, they should remain the way they are and any attempts to remake or refresh them are seriously misguided. Has any remake of any film ever really worked?
 
2011-11-17 01:30:37 PM
If they want to remake a Highlander. The how about having every single character Clancy Brown played, and just having a grand battle royal?
 
2011-11-17 01:31:06 PM
movieman_1979: In this day and age of twilight, Connor will probably be some whiny 20 year old who can't fit in at the local college. Love interest will be a student journalist whom everyone thinks is crazy, and the Kurgan will be one of the professors, who just started at the school after feeling the draw of the gathering.

Shia La-paycheck, Kristen Stewart and Willem Dafoe. Toss it all in a blender, hit puree and, voila, instead shiate smoothie and fanboy wharlgarbel.


I read a possible summary of the script and it takes The Highlander and takes a massive crap all over it. Conner isnt the Conner we know. Hes a Pussy. He hides on a Christain University as a teacher. He has never taken a life. The Kurgan is actually alittle more nastier then the original version. He kills immortals on holy ground by convincing the priest to close the church down... which some how makes it non-holy ground anymore. But it was pointed out that they would still respect the site as Holy Ground and wouldnt fight on it (Graveyards for example).

Its just crap upon crap upon crap.
 
2011-11-17 01:31:46 PM
So in other words they are just going to remake it so that in the end Connor is still immortal and he'll be playing "King of the Mountain" for other immortals to come kill him so the studios can cash in with sequels.

In all seriousness unless it's a prequel before Connor they should not be touching this series any more, hell even under those terms they should leave it alone.

Highlander was a great movie, and it ended on a good note.
 
2011-11-17 01:32:50 PM
Old news, they've already had the Fast and Furious director be hired and quit.

I can't believe we haven't had a greenlit link about this.
 
2011-11-17 01:33:31 PM
 
2011-11-17 01:37:06 PM
Saiga410: Remade? I was hoping for the much anticipated Highlander 2 movie to be made. I always though that Highlander could be made into a reputable franchise but alas they stopped with the original.

Cough...Renegade Version...cough
 
2011-11-17 01:37:57 PM
Hawk24: brigid_fitch: rickycal78: Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.

True, it hasn't aged well, but that doesn't mean it needs a remake. Planet of the Apes didn't age well, either, and look what that remake did to it! (The Mark Wahlberg remake, not Rise of the Planet of the Apes which is surprisingly good). Superman didn't fare well over 30 years but Superman Returns did more harm than good.

Sometimes a reboot is a good idea and is done well (See: Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, X-Men: First Class, Buffy if you count the TV series rebooting the awful movie). Other times, it's a good idea gone horribly awry (King Kong, Godzilla, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, The Pink Panther, Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, the aforementioned PotA & Superman Returns). Highlander can still chug along, despite the bad 80s hair. It doesn't need a remake OR a reboot.

If they want to reboot a new franchise, somebody greenlight the Alien prequel, already.

Among many things, a good film reflects the time and the context in which it was made. Some films may seem dated today, but IMHO, they should remain the way they are and any attempts to remake or refresh them are seriously misguided. Has any remake of any film ever really worked?


How about Ben Hur. Or The Wizard of Oz? I thought True Grit was better the second time.
 
2011-11-17 01:41:12 PM
I was against the remake... but may give it a chance (maybe) because of Fresnadillo directing.

I really liked his film Intacto... about people who have the gift of luck and compete in weird games of chance (sometimes deadly) against each other. The winner takes his adversaries' luck adding to his/her own. They all compete for a chance to face off against the luckiest guy who for decades has been undefeated in Russian roulette. It's almost Highlanderish in its plot.
 
2011-11-17 01:42:07 PM
Death_Poot If you do, at least cast Ron Perlman as the Kurgan.

I'd still vote for Clancy for this, but if he's not available, then get Ron.
 
2011-11-17 01:44:45 PM
I read a fanfic on Usenet years ago that blended Trek and Highlander. Duncan is still doing his thing in the 22nd century, and runs into yet another opponent while visiting onboard Enterprise. Swordlarity ensued.....

Somebody alert JJ Abrahms! He could call it, "The Nexis of Suck"

/Abrahms killed Trek
//will never spend another dime on his wretched output..
 
2011-11-17 01:44:57 PM
There should have only been one!
 
2011-11-17 01:48:34 PM
But there can be more than one greenlight about it, amiright?
 
2011-11-17 01:53:57 PM
mark12A: I read a fanfic on Usenet years ago that blended Trek and Highlander. Duncan is still doing his thing in the 22nd century, and runs into yet another opponent while visiting onboard Enterprise. Swordlarity ensued.....

Somebody alert JJ Abrahms! He could call it, "The Nexis of Suck"

/Abrahms killed Trek
//will never spend another dime on his wretched output..


2/10.
 
2011-11-17 02:00:25 PM
McCloud:

theuniblog.evilspacerobot.com

(if Brody could bulk up for Predators, he could bulk up a bit for this; he's not tall, but this guy is immortal, not Conan)


Ramirez:

topnews.in


That would interest me.
 
2011-11-17 02:01:45 PM
mark12A: I read a fanfic on Usenet years ago that blended Trek and Highlander. Duncan is still doing his thing in the 22nd century, and runs into yet another opponent while visiting onboard Enterprise. Swordlarity ensued.....

Somebody alert JJ Abrahms! He could call it, "The Nexis of Suck"

/Abrahms killed Trek
//will never spend another dime on his wretched output..


I think I read this. Kirk, Spock and Duncan go to a rave were they all take "E" and let the house music own them. After the club they all go back to Duncans pad where the REAL sword fight happens.

It was called Highlander Trek: The Arousening, I think
 
2011-11-17 02:05:29 PM
Mr_Juche: Hawk24: brigid_fitch: rickycal78: Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.

True, it hasn't aged well, but that doesn't mean it needs a remake. Planet of the Apes didn't age well, either, and look what that remake did to it! (The Mark Wahlberg remake, not Rise of the Planet of the Apes which is surprisingly good). Superman didn't fare well over 30 years but Superman Returns did more harm than good.

Sometimes a reboot is a good idea and is done well (See: Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, X-Men: First Class, Buffy if you count the TV series rebooting the awful movie). Other times, it's a good idea gone horribly awry (King Kong, Godzilla, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, The Pink Panther, Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, the aforementioned PotA & Superman Returns). Highlander can still chug along, despite the bad 80s hair. It doesn't need a remake OR a reboot.

If they want to reboot a new franchise, somebody greenlight the Alien prequel, already.

Among many things, a good film reflects the time and the context in which it was made. Some films may seem dated today, but IMHO, they should remain the way they are and any attempts to remake or refresh them are seriously misguided. Has any remake of any film ever really worked?

How about Ben Hur. Or The Wizard of Oz? I thought True Grit was better the second time.


3:10 to Yuma, Dawn of the Dead, The Fly, The Thomas Crown Affair, John Carpenter's The Thing, Arthur (although I think I'm in the minority there), If you count re-imaginings, I'd add The Magnificent Seven, A Fistful of Dollars, & Little Shop of Horrors to the list.

Sometimes remakes work, as long as you have good people at the helm who respect the original. They don't work when you've got idiots who just want to cash in on a blockbuster.
 
2011-11-17 02:14:49 PM
www.craigfergusons.com
Let him play Ramirez, come on, it's tradition!
 
2011-11-17 02:17:23 PM
CowboyNinjaD: If Ramirez is still supposed to be Egyptian, they should get this guy to play him:

[images.wikia.com image 292x400]

He was the head terrorist in Iron Man and the captain of the Kelvin in the Star Trek movie. He's also been on Warehouse 13 a few times. I don't know, whenever I see him, I always think, "This guy is pretty good. He should be in more stuff."


CowboyNinjaD: If Ramirez is still supposed to be Egyptian, they should get this guy to play him:

[images.wikia.com image 292x400]

He was the head terrorist in Iron Man and the captain of the Kelvin in the Star Trek movie. He's also been on Warehouse 13 a few times. I don't know, whenever I see him, I always think, "This guy is pretty good. He should be in more stuff."


Faran Tahir's agent's Fark handle apparently.

/Highlander Remake? WTF?!
 
2011-11-17 02:32:08 PM
simplicimus: JustSeanV67: Is it really too much to ask for a new, original idea for movies and TV??

Yes, it is. New = uncertain, old = proven.


Proven....to who pretell?
 
2011-11-17 02:33:38 PM
Trocadero: [www.craigfergusons.com image 300x400]
Let him play Ramirez, come on, it's tradition!


Fine, but where is the French guy to play the scotsman?
 
2011-11-17 02:35:27 PM
Rwa2play: simplicimus: JustSeanV67: Is it really too much to ask for a new, original idea for movies and TV??

Yes, it is. New = uncertain, old = proven.

Proven....to who pretell?


Proven to have a story that sells, proven to have an audience.
 
2011-11-17 02:38:09 PM
Hawk24: brigid_fitch: rickycal78: Meh, the movie could use an update. There's plenty of bad acting and horribly 80s looks when you watch it. Keep the sound track though.

True, it hasn't aged well, but that doesn't mean it needs a remake. Planet of the Apes didn't age well, either, and look what that remake did to it! (The Mark Wahlberg remake, not Rise of the Planet of the Apes which is surprisingly good). Superman didn't fare well over 30 years but Superman Returns did more harm than good.

Sometimes a reboot is a good idea and is done well (See: Casino Royale, Batman Begins, Star Trek, X-Men: First Class, Buffy if you count the TV series rebooting the awful movie). Other times, it's a good idea gone horribly awry (King Kong, Godzilla, Charlie & the Chocolate Factory, The Pink Panther, Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, the aforementioned PotA & Superman Returns). Highlander can still chug along, despite the bad 80s hair. It doesn't need a remake OR a reboot.

If they want to reboot a new franchise, somebody greenlight the Alien prequel, already.

Among many things, a good film reflects the time and the context in which it was made. Some films may seem dated today, but IMHO, they should remain the way they are and any attempts to remake or refresh them are seriously misguided. Has any remake of any film ever really worked?


John Carpenter's remake of The Thing was pretty good, as was Cronenborg's remake of The Fly.

If they're going to remake Highlander, please at least cast someone Scottish as the main MacLeod (Gerard Butler maybe?)

Maybe Arnold Vosloo (The Mummy) as Ramirez

Ron Perlman would make a great Kurgan, so kudos whoever made that call.

And yes, keep the Queen soundtrack.
 
2011-11-17 02:55:05 PM
The Shroom: If they want to remake a Highlander. The how about having every single character Clancy Brown played, and just having a grand battle royal?

I love that idea more than any future children I may possibly have.
 
2011-11-17 02:56:02 PM
All of you forget one thing, we're all safe until they remake the Goonies. That's when we burn down a studio.
 
Displayed 50 of 105 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »