McQueary was putting sneakers into his locker late on a Friday night when, the jury said, he saw Sandusky having sex with a young boy.

Doesn't the grand jury say he was getting recruitment tapes?

Gwendolyn: Doesn't the grand jury say he was getting recruitment tapes?

No, it says he was putting newly purchased shoes in a locker.

Well that nicely casts doubt on the whole thing. Well, would without that bizarre Sandusky phone call. I'm sure all the people here will immediately fall back from their 'JoePa deserves to burn for not being the police.'

feckingmorons: 1) He is full of shiat.

2) The article makes no sense. It says the university police received no report, then next paragraph says they are checking with the university police. Is there something I'm missing?

But a spokesperson for Penn State's campus police told CBS News that they never received a sex abuse report from McQueary. Separately, State College Police Chief Thomas R. King told CBS News that his department has no record of ever being contacted by McQueary regarding allged sex abuse.


The university also has its own police force. Penn State administrators said they were looking into whether McQueary contacted campus police. A university official also told CBS News Tuesday that, to her knowledge, no police report was filed.

I think McQueary briefly imagined he was a Spartan coach.

NFA: Gwendolyn: Doesn't the grand jury say he was getting recruitment tapes?

No, it says he was putting newly purchased shoes in a locker.

I googled it. It says he was putting new shoes in his locker AND getting tapes.

Did he mean the band "The Police"?

I don't think he's necessarily lying in his email, I think he's being rather vague because he's trying to not be the guy that let a 10 year old get butt raped in a shower. He basically says I made sure it stopped. Well, does that mean you made it stop right then or does that mean you made it stop as in it didn't happen again (at least to that kid). I'm inclined to believe that he stopped in the sense that it didn't happen again. Remember the Governor was on MTP Sunday and said that McQueary failed his moral obligation or somesuch. The Governor initially started the investigation so he may have some inside knowledge as to his testimony

Further, remember the VP of Finance is somehow over Campus PD. So if he talked to Paterno and then they talked with the VP, then he can technically get away with saying he talking to the Police about it. Sure, it's a huuuuuuuuuuuuuge stretch on his part but one could argue it's technically correct

And finally, I'm pretty sure that McQueary is gonna take the fall on this for the VP's and Paterno

I dunno that I'd trust the university police to be honest... I've seen plenty of cases where they ignore crime reports to keep campus crime statistics low... I think this might just have bit them in the ass and they'd rather he goes down for it than they do.

And NOW we are just to believe what the police say?

GDubDub: It's really a shame what is happening here. McQuery tells everyone that he walked in on a child being raped, walked away shrugging his shoulders, gets ripped a new one for being subhuman (as anyone who turns a blind eye to that *is*), gets embarassed, and changes his story. He's handing Sandusky reasonable-doubt on a plate.

Except the Grand Jury report has like NINE victims. They don't need his testimony.

So he can put up all this effort to try to save his ass but couldn't put in a bit more effort to save that little boy?

Jamieboy: Then gone back and taken a fire extinguisher and give the farking sob an enema, then beat him in the head with it.

Cool story, ITG.