If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Morning Call) Fail The dangers of representing yourself in court: "What did the robber sound like?" "He sounded like you"   (mcall.com) divider line 34
More: Fail, Northampton County, Lehigh County, holiday inn express, Quakertown, robbery  
•       •       •

8133 clicks; posted to Main » on 16 Nov 2011 at 10:12 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



34 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
2011-11-16 09:50:37 AM
*insert cunningplan.jpg here*

Hey, pal, MENSA called...it wasn't for you.
 
2011-11-16 10:19:46 AM
Fool for a c... Yeah nuff said.
 
2011-11-16 10:22:19 AM
Anyone who defends themselves in court has a fool for a lawyer.
 
2011-11-16 10:27:11 AM
Cesar [...] claimed he was charged because police searching for a black male simply happened upon him after one of the robberies while he was driving to his girlfriend's house in Bethlehem.

If there's one thing you can always count on, it's that the biggest scumbags will always play the victim.
 
2011-11-16 10:33:25 AM
unchellmatt: Anyone who defends themselves in court has a fool for a lawyer.

Thank you. I did not remember it mixed up, but i think it is safe to say that he was a fool.
I don't think it is fare to allow a defendant to to question the victom a second time.
 
2011-11-16 10:34:29 AM
Even lawyers hire lawyers when they're charged with something. Get a damn lawyer.
 
2011-11-16 10:36:47 AM
I was on a jury where a the defendant represented himself (armed robbery). It was pretty similar to this.
 
2011-11-16 10:41:05 AM
"OK, but what did he look like?"
"A farking idiot."
 
2011-11-16 10:41:40 AM
video man: Even lawyers hire lawyers when they're charged with something. Get a damn lawyer.

If we kept that up, the whole planet would be laywers and nothing else. I say we need fewer lawyers, and more bartenders.
 
2011-11-16 10:41:46 AM
I seem to remember a similar situation with the subway shooter many years ago. Only it went along the lines of the "Did you see {his name} shoot you?" "Yes, I saw you shoot me!"
 
2011-11-16 10:42:30 AM
Ladies and gentleman of the jury. I would like to axe you what a black man robbing a gas station for cigarettes and $46 might sound like.
 
2011-11-16 10:47:06 AM
cdn.inquisitr.com

From the mouths of babes.
 
2011-11-16 10:47:40 AM
Minimally Hairy Beer-Powered Simian: video man: Even lawyers hire lawyers when they're charged with something. Get a damn lawyer.

If we kept that up, the whole planet would be laywers and nothing else. I say we need fewer lawyers, and more bartenders.


I would be OK in a world full of bartenders.
 
2011-11-16 10:55:39 AM
Ok, but what did he smell like?
 
2011-11-16 10:56:12 AM
okay.. once.. I understand him being dumb enough to ask it once... but then to ask a second victim before he realized he should stop asking that question?
 
2011-11-16 10:56:34 AM
media.fukung.net
 
2011-11-16 11:17:05 AM
Remember, this guy is one of the 99%
 
2011-11-16 11:17:34 AM
Couldn't he just ask for a bad trial thingy?
 
2011-11-16 11:36:49 AM
Beeblebrox: Couldn't he just ask for a bad trial thingy?

Look, yer majesty, if I can't smoke and swear, I'm farked.
 
2011-11-16 11:44:44 AM
3.bp.blogspot.com
 
2011-11-16 11:59:43 AM
This is an example of how if something can be done does not mean that it should be done.

He might as well called the invisible ghost who never lies.

/"Don't point at me, you jackass!"
 
2011-11-16 12:39:32 PM
"African-Americans have that particular accent - the way they talk," he said. "I'm not trying to stereotype."

Dats racist.
 
2011-11-16 01:11:27 PM
Inhalien: "African-Americans have that particular accent - the way they talk," he said. "I'm not trying to stereotype."

Dats racist, yo!


FTFY
 
2011-11-16 01:22:17 PM
Well, someone from Bethlehem said "Give unto Cesar"

///What's the problem, This was in the Bible, wasn't it?
 
2011-11-16 02:05:40 PM
"Your honor, I call to the stand my surprise witness: The Ghost That Never Lies. But only I can see him and hear him, so I'll tell you what he says. Ghost That Never Lies, did you witness the events that took place on that fateful day? You did. Well, how interesting. And do you see the culprit in this court room today? You do. Well, would you kindly point him or her out for this court? Don't point at me, you jackass!"
 
2011-11-16 02:08:19 PM
Minimally Hairy Beer-Powered Simian: video man: Even lawyers hire lawyers when they're charged with something. Get a damn lawyer.

If we kept that up, the whole planet would be laywers and nothing else. I say we need fewer lawyers, and more bartenders.


Who keeps the bartenders in business?

Exactly.
 
2011-11-16 02:11:46 PM
The legal system is full of tards who think they know better than trained, experienced lawyers how to successfully defend against criminal charges. Apparently a brilliant criminal mind + 40 hours of Judge Judy qualify you as the next Perry farking Mason.

People will insist on representing themselves EVEN WHEN A FREE LAWYER IS AVAILABLE TO THEM.

I don't get it. I wouldn't operate on my own body, and I watch House all the time.

/I mean, I get it. They're morons.
 
2011-11-16 03:22:14 PM
indylaw: The legal system is full of tards who think they know better than trained, experienced lawyers how to successfully defend against criminal charges. Apparently a brilliant criminal mind + 40 hours of Judge Judy qualify you as the next Perry farking Mason.

People will insist on representing themselves EVEN WHEN A FREE LAWYER IS AVAILABLE TO THEM.

I don't get it. I wouldn't operate on my own body, and I watch House all the time.

/I mean, I get it. They're morons.


Depends on the situation. A buddy of mine was getting nowhere with several lawyers in his case with CPS. He fired his lawyers, studied up on his situation, two weeks later everything is back to normal (or as close to normal as possible). So, yeah, some dumbass thinking 'I watch enough CSI and Judge Judy, I got this' probably ought to keep a lawyer. But if all you lawyer does is say "Comply with whatever new BS the court comes up with this week, here's a $5000 bill", and you are willing to put some time and effort into actually figuring out the pertinent laws, you can come out ok on your own.
 
2011-11-16 04:05:31 PM
unchellmatt: Anyone who defends themselves in court has a fool for a lawyer.

A man who is his own lawyer has fool for a client.

-Henry Kett, 1814

Also, most public defenders are crap. If you can't afford your own lawyer, there is a very good chance your PD will push you to pleade nolo contendere.
 
2011-11-16 04:20:25 PM
I bet he gave Sandusky the advice to go ahead with that interview.
 
2011-11-16 04:21:32 PM
Too bad this defendant didn't have a nice judge like this terrorist had and did not allow him to defend himself:
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/moussaoui/zmaccount.htm l
(sorry, mobile, probably doesn't pop or may even require copy-pasting)

But I give him a rare 10/10 for the Springsteen thing.

Trolling gold.
 
2011-11-16 04:24:56 PM
Would be interested to hear what precedents this sets from Fark's resident law GEDs.

Thanks.
 
2011-11-16 04:44:54 PM
"What did the robber who stole your beer sound like?" "He sounded like Drew"
 
2011-11-16 06:29:54 PM
Getting that same surprise response out of the second witness makes me wonder if the prosecutor declined to make the normal motion to exclude witnesses at the start of the trial, knowing that the defendant wouldn't know to make the motion either. I wouldn't be surprised, therefore, if the second witness had thus been present in court when the first witness was on the stand.

Amusing as it is to watch pro se morons defending themselves, they can create a nightmare if a judge is overly accomodating and not holding them to standards. I don't mean not knowing the exact wording of something or not memorising rule numbers. I'm talking about judges feeling sorry for the dumb schmuck and letting him walk all over the court and other parties, using so much discretion that it borders on abuse of discretion, letting the pro se ignore rules and deadlines with impunity, et cet. - and you can forget about getting sanctions for the series of baseless motions that you still have to defend against.

I've got a case right now in which we had that problem with a pro se plaintif who apparently thinks his numerous years in prison and shucking & jiving gives him an edge. His head nearly exploded at our most recent hearing; the new judge (some judges got rotated; this wasn't specific to our case) was being patient with him letting him be heard, but wasn't just rolling over like he had become accustomed to with the original judge.
 
Displayed 34 of 34 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »