If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Celebslam) Asinine I miss the days of Old Hollywood, you know, the time when celebs didn't demand $60k to wear lip gloss   (celebslam.celebuzz.com) divider line 52
More: Asinine, Kim Kardashian, In Touch Weekly, celebrity  
•       •       •

6199 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 15 Nov 2011 at 6:07 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



52 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-15 06:12:44 PM
According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

So what? She's got you idiots handing her piles of money as it is. She figures you're good for more so why not ask for it?

Welcome to negotiations, "cosmetics pro".
 
2011-11-15 06:13:06 PM
For 60k, that lip gloss better end up on my cock at the end of the night.
 
2011-11-15 06:13:09 PM
I miss the days of Old Hollywood, you know, the time when celebs didn't demand $60k to wear lip gloss were actually celebs and not attention whores who's only claim to fame was a sex tape with a no-name rapper.

FTFY Subby
 
2011-11-15 06:13:22 PM
I'll take $60 to wear lip gloss.
 
2011-11-15 06:14:48 PM
As much as I hate her, shes just playing Supply and Demand, I guarantee her stock is very near "Over-Saturation" and should start slowly fading from public eye(hopefully) within about a year.Until then, if idiots want to keep giving her large amounts of money to quite literally do nothing, then I dont see a reason for her to stop.
 
2011-11-15 06:23:35 PM
img443.imageshack.us
 
2011-11-15 06:23:58 PM
Rapmaster2000: According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

So what? She's got you idiots handing her piles of money as it is. She figures you're good for more so why not ask for it?

Welcome to negotiations, "cosmetics pro".


Yeah, what he said.
 
2011-11-15 06:25:12 PM
Rapmaster2000: According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

So what? She's got you idiots handing her piles of money as it is. She figures you're good for more so why not ask for it?

Welcome to negotiations, "cosmetics pro".


You want someone to hawk your product, you get to pay what they demand, or pound sand.

Boo hoo.
 
2011-11-15 06:27:04 PM
You know. We're the ones responsible for the way modern culture is right? We treat ordinary people like they're gods. We shower them with adoration and attention because why? They can sing, play a game, or act? And they, being the ordinary tool using monkeys they are, lap it up. Wouldn't you? It's stupid and pointless. And we only have ourselves to blame. And then we have another class of morons who are famous for being famous. And we let them be famous and still act like they're shiatting gold.
 
2011-11-15 06:27:40 PM
Rapmaster2000: According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

So what? She's got you idiots handing her piles of money as it is. She figures you're good for more so why not ask for it?

Welcome to negotiations, "cosmetics pro".


Excactly. I'd probably do the same. Why do something for free when you can get bank for it? Call me a sellout, I'd be the sellout laughing at the idiots enabling this behavior all the way to my mansion.
 
2011-11-15 06:32:03 PM
scottydoesntknow: I miss the days of Old Hollywood, you know, the time when celebs didn't demand $60k to wear lip gloss were actually celebs and not attention whores who's only claim to fame was a sex tape with a no-name rapper.

FTFY Subby


Came here to say something similar. Thanky. I just wish these people would go away already...
 
2011-11-15 06:36:05 PM
scottydoesntknow: I miss the days of Old Hollywood, you know, the time when celebs didn't demand $60k to wear lip gloss were actually celebs and not attention whores who's only claim to fame was a sex tape with a no-name rapper.

"Every generation throws a hero up the pop charts."
-Paul Simon
 
2011-11-15 06:43:44 PM
I'd probably also demand $60k for wearing the amount of slimy goop she usually does on my lips. That stuff is repulsive. But then again, so is she. I don't think it's possible for her to be less repulsive but maybe laying off the lip goop would be a start. So if they don't want to pay, it's a good thing.
 
2011-11-15 06:47:30 PM
Does this really surprise anyone? It's been quite obvious since she put out her sex tape that this girl is an AW who's willing to do anything to make a buck.

If you don't think she oked that tape then I have a really nice bridge to sell you.
 
2011-11-15 06:50:06 PM
She always reminds me of a drag queen. She wears so much make-up she might as well be one.

But I guess she doesn't get paid for toning it down.
 
2011-11-15 06:59:55 PM
Without even clicking the link, I knew who this had to be referencing. And no, I will not click the link and keep her fame going. Just like I avoid articles about anyone who got their fame from large numbers of kids in the home.
 
2011-11-15 07:00:04 PM
What do they have against the free market? Nothing has intrinsic value, things are worth what others will pay for them. If $60k is too much, don't pay it, or find someone cheaper. If you find equally good people who will do it for less, she will lower her price, or not get business.
 
2011-11-15 07:05:52 PM
Think of it this way - they didn't have to pay her the 60k, AND they're getting free publicity out of this. I think they won.
 
2011-11-15 07:06:47 PM
Maybe she knows she has no real talent and just wants to grab what she can get for whatever it is she CAN do.
 
2011-11-15 07:16:49 PM
This thread combines two of my favorite phenomena: people giving attention to attention whores by complaining about the amount of attention they receive, and the belief that humans were somehow fundamentally different in living memory.
 
2011-11-15 07:20:02 PM
She reminds me of Casey Anthony. Eeesh!
 
2011-11-15 07:25:27 PM
It's times like this it'd be a lot of fun to be a billionaire. Could see how much money it would take to get Kim Kardashian, or some other celebutante AW to stop wearing clothes altogether. A few million ought to do it, she loves money and attention, this way she'd get plenty of both.

That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.
 
2011-11-15 07:35:31 PM
Not that I'm hating on Kim or anything, but besides having a sex tape, having a fat ass, and her father being a lawyer, why is she famous?

Hell I didn't even know about her until the sex tape, however since then it's like she's everywhere doing everything.
 
2011-11-15 07:35:39 PM
ConConHead: Think of it this way - they didn't have to pay her the 60k, AND they're getting free publicity out of this. I think they won.

Free publicity? I didn't see the name of the lip gloss company mentioned in the article.

LectertheChef:
That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.


Is a nazi orgy with 5 hookers (new window, possibly NSFW) cool enough for you?
 
2011-11-15 07:41:52 PM
According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

I'm playing a special Laboratoire FarkerUK violin, made from pentapeptides and pro-v formula, that prevents free radicals, just for the cosmetic industry. Companies that produce overpriced, heavily marketed products that cost far more than they cost to produce and do far less than eating fruit and going to the gym.
 
2011-11-15 07:46:42 PM
LegacyDL: Not that I'm hating on Kim or anything, but besides having a sex tape, having a fat ass, and her father being a lawyer, why is she famous?

Hell I didn't even know about her until the sex tape, however since then it's like she's everywhere doing everything.


Because her parents were famous and she was on a reality show.

/there really has never been a list of "valid qualifiers" for being famous, regardless of what some seem to think
 
2011-11-15 07:47:46 PM
Atomic Spunk:

Is a nazi orgy with 5 hookers (new window, possibly NSFW) cool enough for you?


I've always hated roll playing. I don't want to have to stay in character to get off. Too much work.
 
2011-11-15 08:11:37 PM
Car_Ramrod: Rapmaster2000: According to one cosmetics professional, the reality star demanded a whopping $60,000 just to use their lip gloss on her show. "We couldn't believe it," the cosmetics pro says.

So what? She's got you idiots handing her piles of money as it is. She figures you're good for more so why not ask for it?

Welcome to negotiations, "cosmetics pro".

Excactly. I'd probably do the same. Why do something for free when you can get bank for it? Call me a sellout, I'd be the sellout laughing at the idiots enabling this behavior all the way to my mansion.


You're not selling out. You're buying in.
 
2011-11-15 08:12:14 PM
Atomic Spunk: ConConHead: Think of it this way - they didn't have to pay her the 60k, AND they're getting free publicity out of this. I think they won.

Free publicity? I didn't see the name of the lip gloss company mentioned in the article.

LectertheChef:
That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

Is a nazi orgy with 5 hookers (new window, possibly NSFW) cool enough for you?


It's a start.
 
2011-11-15 08:29:30 PM
Knara: LegacyDL: Not that I'm hating on Kim or anything, but besides having a sex tape, having a fat ass, and her father being a lawyer, why is she famous?

Hell I didn't even know about her until the sex tape, however since then it's like she's everywhere doing everything.

Because her parents were famous and she was on a reality show.



I thought she was famous for having a big ass and being in a sex tape?
 
2011-11-15 08:33:05 PM
First of all, subby, fark you for making me click on a link about a Kardashian. Second of all, starlets hawked makeup for money in the olden days, too. (new window) Actresses and models are celebrities. Kardashians are fame-whoring tramps. And, finally, fark you for not mentioning "Kardashian" in the headline so I could stay away from the story.

Did I mention, "fark you!" for the unidentified Kardashian link?
 
2011-11-15 08:35:19 PM
I never saw the video but didn't Ray J "gloss" her lips for free?
 
2011-11-15 08:40:22 PM
eagles95: I thought she was famous for having a big ass and being in a sex tape?

That added to it.
 
2011-11-15 08:45:05 PM
LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.
 
2011-11-15 09:45:03 PM
I believe this crap vailidates my claim thay celbrity worship is the true religion on the U.S.
 
2011-11-15 09:49:38 PM
Braindeath: LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.


That's a lot better than buying houses, private jets and yachts, and coming up with new ways to make even more money. I'd run experiments, see how far people will go for some money. Granted, most of that will be sexual in nature, but who hasn't wanted to see that MILF down the street deepthroat a donkey? Or have that cute girl who works at Starbucks spend a month or two as your dog? Maybe see how much it'd take to consummate someone else's marriage, while the groom watches? I'd also be quite generous though, and share the video of such exploits with all the world.
 
2011-11-15 10:14:05 PM
Cagey B: This thread combines two of my favorite phenomena: people giving attention to attention whores by complaining about the amount of attention they receive, and the belief that humans were somehow fundamentally different in living memory.

QFT
 
2011-11-15 10:16:56 PM
ifarkthereforiam: I believe this crap vailidates my claim thay celbrity worship is the true religion on the U.S.

Pray at the alter of the grocery store checkout line.

Morons keep buying her story - so she can charge what she likes for every aspect of her life.
 
2011-11-15 10:38:47 PM
wwwcdn.net
 
2011-11-15 10:40:41 PM
ConConHead: Think of it this way - they didn't have to pay her the 60k, AND they're getting free publicity out of this. I think they won.

Now THAT is deep.
 
2011-11-15 10:58:31 PM
DeaH: First of all, subby, fark you for making me click on a link about a Kardashian. Second of all, starlets hawked makeup for money in the olden days, too. (new window) Actresses and models are celebrities. Kardashians are fame-whoring tramps. And, finally, fark you for not mentioning "Kardashian" in the headline so I could stay away from the story.

Did I mention, "fark you!" for the unidentified Kardashian link?


I'm not sure who else you possibly thought it could have been?
 
2011-11-15 11:02:07 PM
You don't need to pay Kim Kardashian $60k to put something on her lips. You just need to make sure it comes in the shape of a penis with a large bank account.

Win.
 
2011-11-15 11:08:05 PM
LectertheChef: Braindeath: LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.

That's a lot better than buying houses, private jets and yachts, and coming up with new ways to make even more money. I'd run experiments, see how far people will go for some money. Granted, most of that will be sexual in nature, but who hasn't wanted to see that MILF down the street deepthroat a donkey? Or have that cute girl who works at Starbucks spend a month or two as your dog? Maybe see how much it'd take to consummate someone else's marriage, while the groom watches? I'd also be quite generous though, and share the video of such exploits with all the world.


Such a benevolent man.
 
2011-11-15 11:33:13 PM
PleaseHamletDon'tHurtEm: DeaH: First of all, subby, fark you for making me click on a link about a Kardashian. Second of all, starlets hawked makeup for money in the olden days, too. (new window) Actresses and models are celebrities. Kardashians are fame-whoring tramps. And, finally, fark you for not mentioning "Kardashian" in the headline so I could stay away from the story.

Did I mention, "fark you!" for the unidentified Kardashian link?

I'm not sure who else you possibly thought it could have been?


An actual celebrity? You know, one who is celebrated for some reason? Ulike a Kardashian, which, did I mention? fark you subby for not identifying that twunt in the headline!
 
2011-11-15 11:37:15 PM
LectertheChef: Braindeath: LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.

That's a lot better than buying houses, private jets and yachts, and coming up with new ways to make even more money. I'd run experiments, see how far people will go for some money. Granted, most of that will be sexual in nature, but who hasn't wanted to see that MILF down the street deepthroat a donkey? Or have that cute girl who works at Starbucks spend a month or two as your dog? Maybe see how much it'd take to consummate someone else's marriage, while the groom watches? I'd also be quite generous though, and share the video of such exploits with all the world.


So you want to be a Ringo Starr film? (new window)
 
2011-11-16 01:26:55 AM
DeaH: PleaseHamletDon'tHurtEm: DeaH: First of all, subby, fark you for making me click on a link about a Kardashian. Second of all, starlets hawked makeup for money in the olden days, too. (new window) Actresses and models are celebrities. Kardashians are fame-whoring tramps. And, finally, fark you for not mentioning "Kardashian" in the headline so I could stay away from the story.

Did I mention, "fark you!" for the unidentified Kardashian link?

I'm not sure who else you possibly thought it could have been?

An actual celebrity? You know, one who is celebrated for some reason? Ulike a Kardashian, which, did I mention? fark you subby for not identifying that twunt in the headline!


I dunno, she's just been smeared everywhere in the media like so much fecal matter lately. It was my first immediate thought.

Oh well.
 
2011-11-16 01:34:18 AM
PleaseHamletDon'tHurtEm: DeaH: PleaseHamletDon'tHurtEm: DeaH: First of all, subby, fark you for making me click on a link about a Kardashian. Second of all, starlets hawked makeup for money in the olden days, too. (new window) Actresses and models are celebrities. Kardashians are fame-whoring tramps. And, finally, fark you for not mentioning "Kardashian" in the headline so I could stay away from the story.

Did I mention, "fark you!" for the unidentified Kardashian link?

I'm not sure who else you possibly thought it could have been?

An actual celebrity? You know, one who is celebrated for some reason? Unlike a Kardashian, which, did I mention? fark you subby for not identifying that twunt in the headline!

I dunno, she's just been smeared everywhere in the media like so much fecal matter lately. It was my first immediate thought.

Oh well.


Are you subby?
 
2011-11-16 04:35:59 AM
Reminds me of my favorite philosophers and logocians:

Beavis : How come Tom Petty's on TV?
Butthead: Coz he's famous, dumbass.
Beavis : Yeah, but how come he's famous?
Butthead: Coz he's on TV, buttmunch!
Beavis : Yeah, but how come he's on TV?

Please, Lord, let them meet the Kardasians.
 
2011-11-16 07:19:45 AM
LectertheChef: Braindeath: LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.

That's a lot better than buying houses, private jets and yachts, and coming up with new ways to make even more money. I'd run experiments, see how far people will go for some money. Granted, most of that will be sexual in nature, but who hasn't wanted to see that MILF down the street deepthroat a donkey? Or have that cute girl who works at Starbucks spend a month or two as your dog? Maybe see how much it'd take to consummate someone else's marriage, while the groom watches? I'd also be quite generous though, and share the video of such exploits with all the world.


Newsletter?
 
2011-11-16 07:55:59 AM
DeaH: LectertheChef: Braindeath: LectertheChef: That's the thing that upsets me about billionaires. They never seem to do anything cool with their money.

I agree. I'd probably just end up pulling a lot of pranks though. or fund Batman.

That's a lot better than buying houses, private jets and yachts, and coming up with new ways to make even more money. I'd run experiments, see how far people will go for some money. Granted, most of that will be sexual in nature, but who hasn't wanted to see that MILF down the street deepthroat a donkey? Or have that cute girl who works at Starbucks spend a month or two as your dog? Maybe see how much it'd take to consummate someone else's marriage, while the groom watches? I'd also be quite generous though, and share the video of such exploits with all the world.

So you want to be a Ringo Starr film? (new window)


Or, if you prefer, a Terry Southern novel... (pops)
 
Displayed 50 of 52 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »