libranoelrose: mhuckins: I'm not an AW, and not offering... but I hear it helps if you have an E in your P.

My E is obviously my username.

I do like the bit o' eyes in your P.

I think she was saying "whut" because the prefix of your username could be followed by hundreds of different E-mail suffixes (Gmail, Hotmail, Charter.net, AO"just grandparents should still be using us"L, etc).

She could also be saying "whut" because your second sentence was a little weird as well.
/whut the hell do I know?

mhuckins: My fb is linked in my pro if you wants real eye candy.

I'm there...

/opened e-mail
//stupifyingly smitten

T-Bone42: Huh?

Nobody move, I dropped my sarcasm tag. It must be around here somewhere...

/Does the 'lost contact lense' shuffle around the floor of Fark

Odd that we're reading the Daily Mail version. Did they publish it because their age of consent is 16, and it gives their readers yet another chance to tut over those repressed Americans?

Jackpot777: Odd that we're reading the Daily Mail version. Did they publish it because their age of consent is 16, and it gives their readers yet another chance to tut guiltily fap over those repressed Americans?

It is the Daily Fail readership we are talking about here - and they are more repressed than you, even behind their net curtains.

Wow she got off easy for Texas (no pun intended)

If it had been student/teacher she would be doing life in Huntsville.

Her son will never live that down.

swahnhennessy: Her son will never live that down.

She probably sent him pics too

Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

veedeevadeevoodee: [www.cbsnews.com image 540x405]

So again farkers where said pics?? These are the interwebz and according to the news report they are online somewhere?? Oh and BIE please??

/EIP, Thank you in advance.

Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

So what your saying is that its ok to use the internet for illicit intentions and continue to use it even after you have been convicted? So by that note its ok for me to keep driving even after I killed someone drunk driving right?

Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

I remembered reading something like this, and I found it: Internet access is considered a basic human right by the UN.

/Oh, and EIP.

Oh_Enough_Already: The fact of the matter is that women do routinely do less time, are given lighter sentences, etc, largely because they are charged with far less serious offenses.

Go figure - Fark's resident racist scumbag is a misogynist as well. Quelle surprise

Ctrl-Alt-Del: Oh_Enough_Already: The fact of the matter is that women do routinely do less time, are given lighter sentences, etc, largely because they are charged with far less serious offenses.

Go figure - Fark's resident racist scumbag is a misogynist as well. Quelle surprise

Stating that socially, men and women are different, and relevant facts, does not make one a misogynist.

But then again, you being on the Brigade, I could say, "It's a beautiful day outside." and you'd label me a misogynist too.

Ctrl-Alt-Del: Oh_Enough_Already: The fact of the matter is that women do routinely do less time, are given lighter sentences, etc, largely because they are charged with far less serious offenses.

Go figure - Fark's resident racist scumbag is a misogynist as well. Quelle surprise
===================

Feminist Dictionary -Misogynist--- any man who states a fact or points out reality that is against feminist ideology that women are always victims .

Ctrl-Alt-Del: Oh_Enough_Already: The fact of the matter is that women do routinely do less time, are given lighter sentences, etc, largely because they are charged with far less serious offenses.

Go figure - Fark's resident racist scumbag is a misogynist as well. Quelle surprise

Q: How do you get Oh_Enough_Already to defend a woman?
A: Tell him that she's being attacked by a black man.

Q: How do you get Oh_Enough_Already to defend a black man?
A: Tell him that he's being victimized by the evil PC feminazi agenda.

I'm unclear on this whole "sexting" thing with the naughty pictures and the e-mails and whatnot.

Perhaps some female here could show me what all this fuss is about.

Evilsmurf: Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

I remembered reading something like this, and I found it: Internet access is considered a basic human right by the UN.

/Oh, and EIP.

Eh, the UN. That bastion of moral decency and honor. Not really sure why anyone takes anything they say or do seriously anymore.

This kid is clearly never going to be quite right after this and will probably require years of therapy in order to fully come to terms with the damage this woman has caused. Without care he could easily grow to be an alcoholic child-molesting wife-beater as a result of this atrocity. He'll have something to blame it on, in any event.

eas81: Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

So what your saying is that its ok to use the internet for illicit intentions and continue to use it even after you have been convicted? So by that note its ok for me to keep driving even after I killed someone drunk driving right?

FTA:

She had faced up to ten years in jail but the judge sentenced her to five years probation with a stipulation that her internet access be restricted to work use.

Since it's not a total ban in the first place I'd say the judge would be inclined to disregard any potential hyperbolic slippery slopes, eas81. While we're playing with hyperbole, it's worth noting that trying to ban someone from the internet is sort of like trying to ban someone from viewing the sun on a cloudless day.

Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

I didn't RTFA, but my problem with it is banning someone from using the internet for something that wasn't really using the internet to start with. It might use the internet as a transmission mechanism, but it's not like sexting is done when surfing. I know I used to be able to send picture messages from a phone without internet access.

See that look on her face? That's what it looks like when you're permabanned from the internet.

FirstNationalBastard: Oh, come on... he was 16! He was probably grateful!

ParaHandy: Definitely a victimless crime.

So now we've established that giving pornography to underage teenage boys is a good thing.

Logically, then, this would have gone exactly the same direction if it had been a male teacher and/or an underage female student.

cyberspacedout: This article is just farked up. I mean, look at this grammatical abomination in the caption to the first photo:

Technology penalty: Texas mom Lori David was banned from using the internet and text messages rather than send her to prison after sending nude photographs of herself to her friend's 16-year-old son

Uhhh...somehow I think you're missing the point of this thread.

Evilsmurf: I remembered reading something like this, and I found it: Internet access is considered a basic human right by the UN.

Just curious: did any of the Middle East nations sign on to that?

swahnhennessy: Her son will never live that down.

Son's friend: "Do you have any nude pics of your mom?"

Son: "No"

Son's friend: "Here, take mine."

omeganuepsilon: Stating that socially, men and women are different, and relevant facts, does not make one a misogynist.

You sound kinda butthurt, you poor poor man you. I mean, how it must suck knowing that women get all the advantages in our society. How hard it must be to be you, all oppressed by the wimminz

WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE MENZ?!!

omeganuepsilon: But then again, you being on the Brigade, I could say, "It's a beautiful day outside." and you'd label me a misogynist too.

Nah, I'm really just pushing your buttons, don't take that last post seriously.

But for real, you may want to be careful who you side with here, because Oh_Enough_Already is not an honest actor in this discussion. He really is one of the most hateful little beasts I've seen on this site. And while his "relevant facts" may seem innocuous enough, coming from someone like him it's a giant pile of yellow flags and dog-whistles. Seriously.

Maybe next he'll regale us with some "relevant facts" about race and incarceration rates

eas81: Barakku: Er, doesn't anyone else find it disturbing they're even allowed to ban someone from using the Internet? These days the Internet is as important for freedom of expression and communication as being able to speak. If it came right down to it I would prefer losing the ability to speak to losing the ability to do the endless list of things you can do on the internet.

So what your saying is that its ok to use the internet for illicit intentions and continue to use it even after you have been convicted? So by that note its ok for me to keep driving even after I killed someone drunk driving right?

To be fair, I don't think anyone has ever been killed by sexting, unless they were doing it while driving.

I could be wrong, though.

I feel sorry for this poor kid.
Mom found out before he could get some.

Allen262: I'll get this out of the way...

If it was man he would be gone for life in jail. Double standard is crap. A crime is crime. The scales of justice should be blind to sex and skin color.

The situation is not the same. I'm sorry but it isn't. No 16 year old kid is getting scarred by receiving nude pics of this woman. And the kid is an idiot because I am assuming the only reason this woman got caught is because he couldn't keep his mouth shut

mhuckins: Megaton Suntan: mhuckins: I really hoped this thread would turn into a BIEfest. Fark, you disappoint me.

Perhaps with an example of what WOULD constitute a picture which then received would result in one being considered "lucky" and lead to spontaneous fapping? Preposterous!

I don't think my secret pretend fark boyfriend would like that. I do enjoy the hordes of lonely farkers begging for images from the aw's. Especially when they comment on the anonymous gifts they have received. Of course I never post about it then deny. That's just mean.

checks profile .... cute :-)

/ EIP
// Mrs PH is open minded and bi-curious, but I will not share BIE with her without permission

Wonder how legal this is overall. I think everyone should have the right to the nets.

/Also, the right to BIE
//EIP

Allen262: If it was man he would be gone for life in jail. Double standard is crap. A crime is crime. The scales of justice should be blind to sex and skin color

The eyes should however be wide open to victim impact

I doubt there was much of that here

Women of Fark, I would just like to say that your fathers would be very disappointed in you if you sent out BIE. And you wouldn't want to make your father mad by sending BIE to the email address in my profile, would you?

Ctrl-Alt-Del: omeganuepsilon: But then again, you being on the Brigade, I could say, "It's a beautiful day outside." and you'd label me a misogynist too.

Nah, I'm really just pushing your buttons, don't take that last post seriously.

But for real, you may want to be careful who you side with here, because Oh_Enough_Already is not an honest actor in this discussion. He really is one of the most hateful little beasts I've seen on this site. And while his "relevant facts" may seem innocuous enough, coming from someone like him it's a giant pile of yellow flags and dog-whistles. Seriously.

Maybe next he'll regale us with some "relevant facts" about race and incarceration rates

I'm not siding with a person, I'm siding with a single argument, a claim you made that made him a misogynist necessarily because of a small fact.

that came out backwards, but whatever.

abb3w: clyph: How dense do you have to be not to know that the first rule of MILF club is that you don't talk about MILF club?

Apparently, his parents checked out his phone's contents, and weren't happy with what they found. Learning not to leave evidence when doing something stupid is a bit of an advanced skill.

After this maybe he'll figure out that he can send any future nudes he receives to a secure email address so he can delete them from the phone and still safely view them later without worry.

Not that I'd know anything about doing that.