If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Dumbass Herman Cain criticizes Obama for Bush cancelling the space shuttle program   (rr.com) divider line 238
More: Dumbass, Herman Cain, space shuttles, National Restaurant Association, god, Rick Perry, International Space Station  
•       •       •

3531 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Nov 2011 at 10:58 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



238 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-13 06:50:44 PM
www.strangecosmos.com
 
2011-11-13 07:12:15 PM
Dammit....I have to give Herman credit on this. Obama could have stopped that. It was a bad move. Bush had a replacement in the works, Obama cancelled that. Of course it is fair to say we can't afford either right now.
 
2011-11-13 07:25:47 PM
Cuts have to be made somewhere. I'd rather see them cut the space shuttle any day before they cut things like Social Security (that all of us have paid into since our first day of work) or Medicare (same thing).... I honestly don't care if this country can, or does, put men in space and I have never actually heard a convincing argument as to why I should.
 
2011-11-13 07:32:58 PM
serpent_sky: Cuts have to be made somewhere. I'd rather see them cut the space shuttle any day before they cut things like Social Security (that all of us have paid into since our first day of work) or Medicare (same thing).... I honestly don't care if this country can, or does, put men in space and I have never actually heard a convincing argument as to why I should.

Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.
 
2011-11-13 07:34:10 PM
Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

So, how about you give me some facts? I'm not the sort who isn't open to revising my opinion based on actual facts.
 
2011-11-13 07:37:11 PM
serpent_sky: I honestly don't care if this country can, or does, put men in space and I have never actually heard a convincing argument as to why I should.

Because, for every dollar we spend on space exploration, the economy gets approximately an 8 dollar boost.

And, because it's not like the money we spend on space is spent IN space. It's spent here on Earth, mainly in the USA. If you think the stimulus was the right move to make, you've got to realize that NASA is around a 7 billion dollar annual stimulus.

Manned space exploration is good for the economy.
 
2011-11-13 07:38:11 PM
globalwarmingpraiser: Bush had a replacement in the works

Orion was a ridiculous system, and one that could not succeed. The rocket as is could not lift it's payload to the moon, it would require completely redesigning it and rebuild.
 
2011-11-13 07:45:29 PM
serpent_sky: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

So, how about you give me some facts? I'm not the sort who isn't open to revising my opinion based on actual facts.


Link (new window)

Link (new window)

Link (new window)

Link (new window)

A sampling in a simple list format:

An air filtration system that can kill all types of harmful bacteria - even anthrax -- and remove allergens from the air with better than 90 percent efficiency.

An ultralight solar concentrator that gathers power from the Sun and efficiently converts it into electrical power. This could provide a significant source of energy for future space missions.

A water purification process capable of removing two troublesome types of contaminants, perchlorate and nitrate, from water and rendering them harmless.

advanced polymer coatings for implantable devices to help avert heart failure,

robotic technology used for minimally invasive knee surgery;

space suit-derived textiles to help protect firefighters and race car drivers,

astronaut food supplements now in worldwide use to improve baby formula.

If it something that actually bugs you, I'm shocked you never bothered to do a Google search yourself. It's also basic common sense, I can't count the number of commercials and stickers on products promoting that it's based on technology developed by NASA.
 
2011-11-13 07:45:56 PM
So, if God told him to run and he doesn't win what does that mean? And didn't Cain kill Able? I'm confused.
 
2011-11-13 07:48:06 PM
Here's (new window) one that they made for the kiddies
 
2011-11-13 07:52:56 PM
The Iconoclast: So, if God told him to run and he doesn't win what does that mean? And didn't Cain kill Able? I'm confused.

Actually, it was Able's evil twin, Zaire. Try to keep up.
 
2011-11-13 07:53:36 PM
Dan the Schman: If it something that actually bugs you, I'm shocked you never bothered to do a Google search yourself. It's also basic common sense, I can't count the number of commercials and stickers on products promoting that it's based on technology developed by NASA.

It doesn't bug me, per se... it's more of people always saying how "sad" it is to not have manned space exploration, how we "won" getting a man to the moon, how we should "win" getting a man to Mars. Those are the more common talk you hear.

Your list actually does make sense, those are all good things. Perhaps there are other ways to carry that on that are less expensive. I can't think of commercials or products that advertised this, but I have a sense that I don't come in contact with that much along those lines. It's not any sort of willful ignorance, but I certainly will admit ignorance on my part to all of this. I really did think it was just about getting to space and exploring space.
 
2011-11-13 07:54:46 PM
Relatively Obscure: Here's (new window) one that they made for the kiddies

That's still over the head of the average Teabagger.
 
2011-11-13 08:06:47 PM
Time-travel-obama is an asshole.
 
2011-11-13 08:10:27 PM
serpent_sky: Dan the Schman: If it something that actually bugs you, I'm shocked you never bothered to do a Google search yourself. It's also basic common sense, I can't count the number of commercials and stickers on products promoting that it's based on technology developed by NASA.

It doesn't bug me, per se... it's more of people always saying how "sad" it is to not have manned space exploration, how we "won" getting a man to the moon, how we should "win" getting a man to Mars. Those are the more common talk you hear.

Your list actually does make sense, those are all good things. Perhaps there are other ways to carry that on that are less expensive. I can't think of commercials or products that advertised this, but I have a sense that I don't come in contact with that much along those lines. It's not any sort of willful ignorance, but I certainly will admit ignorance on my part to all of this. I really did think it was just about getting to space and exploring space.


I can promise that everyday you make use of technology that was in some way advanced by the Space Race or thereafter.

And it isn't costly... it's the exact opposite, it's a multiplier, like infrastructure. Sadly, it's an area where Republican talking points trump reality.
 
2011-11-13 08:12:40 PM
Dan the Schman: I can promise that everyday you make use of technology that was in some way advanced by the Space Race or thereafter.

And it isn't costly... it's the exact opposite, it's a multiplier, like infrastructure. Sadly, it's an area where Republican talking points trump reality.


Which is all well and accurate, but Orion was a waste of money. We need to get an actual base going, or a proper Mars mission. Orion was a waste of doing what we did once 40 years ago. We need to do something new. That wasn't Orion.
 
2011-11-13 08:20:57 PM
I blame Obama too. And Congress. It was such a tiny fraction of the budget and it was worth every penny.
 
2011-11-13 08:22:08 PM
Dan the Schman: I can promise that everyday you make use of technology that was in some way advanced by the Space Race or thereafter.

Looking at what you linked to and wrote, yes... I agree. I am wondering if there is a way to carry on that sort of work.

And it isn't costly... it's the exact opposite, it's a multiplier, like infrastructure. Sadly, it's an area where Republican talking points trump reality.

Believe me, I don't buy into Republican anything. I wish I knew why people in positions of power don't speak about NASA that way you do....
 
2011-11-13 08:24:26 PM
...and if Obama re-opened the shuttle program, Cain would have been all like, "Good show, old bean! Just what I would have done!".
 
2011-11-13 08:35:34 PM
violentsalvation: I blame Obama too. And Congress. It was such a tiny fraction of the budget and it was worth every penny.

So is Planned Parenthood.
Arguably, so is NPR -- though I don't think that is essential.

Nobody is cutting -- or willing to cut -- anything TRULY significant (military/"defense" being my first choice to that end.... Once again because the military and soldiers have been all but turned into saints over the past decade.
 
2011-11-13 08:36:08 PM
People absolutely freak over airliners that are 25 years old but we should keep sending up 30-year old shuttles? Dumb.

The shuttle was cool and so was going to the moon. Let's do something new. Oh wait, NASA does new all the time. It's just not done with astronauts.
 
2011-11-13 08:42:27 PM
The shuttle was obsolete 40 year old technology. The sad thing is that we didn't spend those years developing the next thing. NASA wanted to, politicians farked it up.
 
2011-11-13 08:43:53 PM
edmo: People absolutely freak over airliners that are 25 years old but we should keep sending up 30-year old shuttles? Dumb.

People get on airlines regularly. The average person has never seen, much less been on, a space shuttle. To me, that makes perfect sense.

I've never been on plane and doubt I ever will be, so I don't think about it. But I am glad as hell my car is 3 years old and not 23 years old. When you point out 25-year-old planes, I think "that's bad -- my in-laws and my sister travel by air a lot!" but it's not something I am acutely aware of day to day,

As a species, we're not very good at understanding things we don't immediately relate to.
 
2011-11-13 09:01:10 PM
"I can tell you that as president of the United States, we are not going to bum a ride to outer space with Russia," Cain said to loud applause. "We're going to regain our rightful place in terms of technology, space technology."

I'm not sure I believe a statement like this from someone who talks to God...and God talks back.
 
2011-11-13 09:03:07 PM
Here is an idea: How about before we put anything else into space, we clean up all the garbage that is already flying around up there?

i.dailymail.co.uk
 
2011-11-13 09:16:57 PM
freedomslighthouse.net


No-one would have believed, in the last years of the twentieth century, that human affairs were being watched from the timeless worlds of space. No-one could have dreamed that we were being scrutinized, as someone with a microscope studies creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. Few men even considered the possibility of life on other planets. And yet, across the gulf of space, minds immeasurably superior to ours regarded this earth with envious eyes; and slowly, and surely, they drew their plans against us.
 
2011-11-13 09:22:11 PM
3.bp.blogspot.com

"That Herman Cain makes me very angry.....very angry indeed!"
 
2011-11-13 09:40:19 PM
GAT_00: Dan the Schman: I can promise that everyday you make use of technology that was in some way advanced by the Space Race or thereafter.

And it isn't costly... it's the exact opposite, it's a multiplier, like infrastructure. Sadly, it's an area where Republican talking points trump reality.

Which is all well and accurate, but Orion was a waste of money. We need to get an actual base going, or a proper Mars mission. Orion was a waste of doing what we did once 40 years ago. We need to do something new. That wasn't Orion.


Recreating what we did 40 years ago would be key to getting a Moon base going.
 
2011-11-13 09:52:39 PM
Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.
 
2011-11-13 10:00:44 PM
vernonFL: Here is an idea: How about before we put anything else into space, we clean up all the garbage that is already flying around up there?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x554]


don't you think that picture is a little misleading? While there may be a lot of space junk up there, there is also ALOT of open space, and that picture doesn't really do justice to the vast amounts of nothingness between the satellites. Maybe if each of the satellites in the diagram was a dot instead of a picture...
 
2011-11-13 10:02:22 PM
Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.


The Republicans will be all for universal coverage... as soon as the poor pay for it and the rich get tax-cuts in exchange for their approval. Essentially, the GOP won't sign off until the poor are paying for the rich's health care =/.
 
2011-11-13 10:03:10 PM
Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.


Are manned space missions more important than an effective universal healthcare model? No. Are they more economically beneficial than a large percentage of defense spending, tax cuts, and Medicare Part D? Most definitely.
 
2011-11-13 10:05:14 PM
Dan the Schman: Are manned space missions more important than an effective universal healthcare model? No.

Then lets cut everything out of the budget that's less important than universal healthcare until we get universal healthcare, then lets start adding things back in if we have spare cash.
 
2011-11-13 10:11:35 PM
vernonFL: Here is an idea: How about before we put anything else into space, we clean up all the garbage that is already flying around up there?

[i.dailymail.co.uk image 634x554]


Those are some HUGE freakin' satellites, yo.
 
2011-11-13 10:15:21 PM
Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Are manned space missions more important than an effective universal healthcare model? No.

Then lets cut everything out of the budget that's less important than universal healthcare until we get universal healthcare, then lets start adding things back in if we have spare cash.


I think you overvalue Universal Healthcare. And rating the "importance" of programs is literally impossible, due to each program effecting different groups of people... unless you think a committee of human beings could fairly determine which groups of humans are more important than others, and therefore the programs that benefit them are more important.
 
2011-11-13 10:37:27 PM
Well, the space program did give us Velcro. There can't be more than like 12 or 13 people without healthcare, right? But everyone uses Velcro.
 
2011-11-13 10:44:25 PM
Mugato: Well, the space program did give us Velcro. There can't be more than like 12 or 13 people without healthcare, right? But everyone uses Velcro.

They used it but they didn't give it to us. George de Mestral invented it.
 
2011-11-13 10:49:20 PM
globalwarmingpraiser: Recreating what we did 40 years ago would be key to getting a Moon base going.

And Orion was a half-assed waste of money.
 
2011-11-13 10:58:13 PM
GAT_00: globalwarmingpraiser: Recreating what we did 40 years ago would be key to getting a Moon base going.

And Orion was a half-assed waste of money.


Why do you say that? I am just wondering. I know I read in Popular Mechanics or something some time ago where armchair engineers said Orion and Ares were horribly designed but I don't remember reading anything else about it. Got any info I can read? I am not trying to argue or anything I just want to read why you have those opinions.
 
2011-11-13 11:01:37 PM
Jeez, what an asshole.
 
2011-11-13 11:03:30 PM
The mods must really want us to know that god told Cain to run.
 
2011-11-13 11:05:38 PM
Most likely apocryphal, but still amusing story:

"In the heady days of the late 60's space race, American scientists were challenged with designing a pen that would write in zero-gravity. Not as easy as it sounds, since commercial pens all rely on Sir Isaac's law to function. After millions of dollars in research and prototypes, NASA was ready to unveil its results. When asked for comment on the upcoming release of the design, Yuri Gegarin boldly claimed that he'd beaten them to it on his very fist mission.

Taken to task by a skeptical reporter, Gegarin reached into his desk and pulled out his thunder-stealing marvel...
...a pencil."


Like I said, probably untrue, but I always liked that legend.

/Big fan of Space Exploration
//Cain needs to STFU
 
2011-11-13 11:05:44 PM
Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.


Universal healthcare will never be affordable as long as people treat it like the search for the fountain of youth. Over 100k is spent on Medicare in a persons last 6 months of life. Doctors will spend way too much to add 2months of painful life. You can have universal healthcare once the program is toned down and reasonable.
 
2011-11-13 11:08:23 PM
Britney Spear's Speculum: The mods must really want us to know that god told Cain to run.

Or lose faith in a God altogether. Either spectrum, it's still depressing.
 
2011-11-13 11:08:50 PM
Lionel Mandrake: "I can tell you that as president of the United States, we are not going to bum a ride to outer space with Russia," Cain said to loud applause. "We're going to regain our rightful place in terms of technology, space technology."

I'm not sure I believe a statement like this from someone who talks to God...and God talks back.


Given his grasp of international politics, I'm surprsed that he didn't talk about hitching a ride with the Soviets....
 
2011-11-13 11:10:32 PM
MyRandomName: Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.

Universal healthcare will never be affordable as long as people treat it like the search for the fountain of youth. Over 100k is spent on Medicare in a persons last 6 months of life. Doctors will spend way too much to add 2months of painful life. You can have universal healthcare once the program is toned down and reasonable.


ZOMGDEATHPANELS!!!!!one!

/thisiswhywecan'thavenicethings.jpg
 
2011-11-13 11:13:09 PM
Sorry libtards, your boy owns this one. He screwed up the space program and now the US is the loser kid in the block. But hey, at least you have single payer healthcare. Hahahah!
 
2011-11-13 11:14:22 PM
violentsalvation: GAT_00: globalwarmingpraiser: Recreating what we did 40 years ago would be key to getting a Moon base going.

And Orion was a half-assed waste of money.

Why do you say that? I am just wondering. I know I read in Popular Mechanics or something some time ago where armchair engineers said Orion and Ares were horribly designed but I don't remember reading anything else about it. Got any info I can read? I am not trying to argue or anything I just want to read why you have those opinions.


I haven't seen anything new in a long time. For all I know, that's where my info came from too, though probably not Popular Mechanics since that never makes it onto my reading list.

Even if it worked properly, I think it's a waste of money to basically redo what we did 40 years ago, even with capsules we couldn't reuse, just to say we did it again. I'm all for a Mars or Moon program, but I want an actual one. Orion was a waste. The whole reason NASA brought so much innovation is that it was something completely new. It HAD to be innovative. Orion wouldn't need to be. A full program would require innovation.
 
2011-11-13 11:14:31 PM
Herman Cain is right. I hear we are close to finally putting a man on the moon, and for Obama to pull the plug as we are about to cross this historic milestone is problematic.
 
2011-11-13 11:16:04 PM
MyRandomName: Lando Lincoln: Dan the Schman: Much like war, the technology developed for such programs trickle down (unlike tax cuts for the wealthy) and become integral parts of daily life. If you've never heard a convincing argument, then I doubt you debated it with anyone who actually knew even the barest of facts.

While true, we've got more important things to spend money on than manned space missions. Give me universal healthcare and then we'll talk about manned space missions.

Universal healthcare will never be affordable as long as people treat it like the search for the fountain of youth. Over 100k is spent on Medicare in a persons last 6 months of life. Doctors will spend way too much to add 2months of painful life. You can have universal healthcare once the program is toned down and reasonable.


Well, there's that. Nobody wants to hear that the best way to add extra years to your life is to improve life on the front end instead of the back.
 
Displayed 50 of 238 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »