If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(News.com.au) Asinine Doctors remove 80% of man's stomach to fight cancer. Here's the part that he has trouble digesting: he never had cancer to begin with   (news.com.au) divider line 87
More: Asinine, Graham Lord, biopsy, stomach cancer  
•       •       •

11374 clicks; posted to Main » on 13 Nov 2011 at 12:06 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



87 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-12 05:46:22 PM
In before anyone tries to blame this on socialized medicine. This has happened in the U.S. too, more than once.
 
2011-11-12 09:21:21 PM
On the bright side, he'll have no trouble keeping his svelte figure well into his seventies.
 
2011-11-12 09:53:40 PM
Good news: the chemo has hugely amplified your chances of getting chemo in the next few years.
 
2011-11-12 09:54:25 PM
GAT_00: Good news: the chemo has hugely amplified your chances of getting chemo cancer in the next few years.

I screw up posts like so often I'm starting to wonder about brain cancer.
 
2011-11-12 09:58:49 PM
GAT_00: GAT_00: Good news: the chemo has hugely amplified your chances of getting chemo cancer in the next few years.

I screw up posts like so often I'm starting to wonder about brain cancer.


Actually, it worked fine the way it was. Clever, even.
 
2011-11-12 10:05:24 PM
PainInTheASP: GAT_00: GAT_00: Good news: the chemo has hugely amplified your chances of getting chemo cancer in the next few years.

I screw up posts like so often I'm starting to wonder about brain cancer.

Actually, it worked fine the way it was. Clever, even.


Yeah, but I'd rather be clever intentionally. That was just accidental derp.
 
2011-11-12 10:54:01 PM
Maybe his doctor was in love with him. The way to a man's heart and all that.
 
2011-11-12 11:20:50 PM
And the part they removed will never get cancer. SUCCESS!
 
2011-11-13 12:09:46 AM
FARTBONGO!!!!!!
 
2011-11-13 12:11:30 AM
Now the cancer I don't have is everywhere.

/Go read a book.
 
2011-11-13 12:12:35 AM
Well, he doesn't have cancer now, does he? Seems to have worked.
 
2011-11-13 12:13:06 AM
This actually happens a lot, and not always due to screw-ups at the pathology lab (although obviously it's rare for the doctors to leap right to cutting out your goddamn stomach as a treatment). Quite a few of the tests they do for cancer have high false-positive results, sometimes as high as 10%.

Yet another reason why you should always get a second opinion. Always.
 
2011-11-13 12:14:23 AM
I bet Jerry regrets buying him those hairpieces.
 
2011-11-13 12:21:13 AM
Well, put it back.
 
2011-11-13 12:30:39 AM
FTA

"I was told that the tissue taken from me during that gastrectomy was examined through the pathology department at Royal North Shore and the lymph nodes that were taken out showed no evidence of cancer," he said.

At least they were honest with him.

They could have said, "yeah, that sack was riddled with tumors, and what we left behind will keep you thin and alive for a bunch more years.

No no... dont thank us for our divine abilitys. Just go on and live your life (the one we returned to you) to the fullest".
 
2011-11-13 12:34:58 AM
That's socialized medicine for you.
 
2011-11-13 12:39:06 AM
Two very important words: Second opinion.
 
2011-11-13 12:40:14 AM
I blame socialized medicine.
 
2011-11-13 12:40:57 AM
That's horrible no matter how you slice it.

Oh, and

*Man told he has stomach cancer
*Doctors remove 80 per cent of stomach
*Tests show he never had cancer


I'm sure Farkers have pointed this out before me, and will continue to point this out after me, but I like the little bullet points of the article right under the headline. It helps me feel extra prepared for what I'm about to read.
 
2011-11-13 12:41:16 AM
Bathia_Mapes: In before anyone tries to blame this on socialized medicine. This has happened in the U.S. too, more than once.

I don't believe Obamacare is truly socialized.
 
2011-11-13 12:46:56 AM
Is it just me or does he have pink hair? Probably from the lighting or something.
However my mom had a similar experience a few years ago, she went into her doctor a couple times during the week for side pains. She waited a few weeks before going to the doctor because she was going to the gym and exercising and wasn't use to it, so she just thought it was normal pains from working out muscles you never use to before. After the second week she went to the doctor, they tested for appendicitis, and it came back negative. Her normal doctor was out of town and said to wait until she came back, and when she did she ordered a ct scan. The ct scan came up something odd by her appendix. So they took her to the ER where three doctors came arguing wtf it was and that if she needed surgery right away. The surgeon came in and said no its probably infection pump her up with iv antibiotics if it doesn't improve he will go in. The next day the surgeon said ok on the surgery since there was no improvement. He held back her surgery 3 times that day and finally went in to remove what he thought was her appendix. Apparently it wasn't there and he removed 2-3ft of her small, large intestines and colon. He told my grandmother and I that her intestines were all damaged and had to be removed, but he told my mom days later he removed all her intestines because he was sure it was cancer. She didn't have cancer, and it kind of turned out her appendix exploded. If the doctor waited any longer than he did, she would of died. My mother now has to go to the bathroom all the time and has a strict diet to help her not have to go ever 20 minutes. She is in constant pain, worse pain than before having the surgery. We will never know if he went over board on to much or not. He removed the parts of her intestines that absorbs water and nutrients to the body so that is why she has to go so much. Also the surgery gave my mother 3 hospital related infections that were not tested by her doctor, a gastro specialists, and her surgeon for a year. After she got rid of them she is a bit better, but she had those infections for so long didn't help either.
 
2011-11-13 12:48:00 AM
Occupy Man's Stomach!

We are the (remaining) 20%!
 
2011-11-13 12:48:23 AM
PainInTheASP: On the bright side, he'll have no trouble keeping his svelte figure well into his seventies.

People pay good money for those gastric pass-me-by operations.
 
2011-11-13 12:54:33 AM
"To find out I didn't have cancer. It was just devastating," he said this week.

"I was numb. I just couldn't believe it. I thought he was going to tell me they found more cancer and then he told me the other way."


you can't make some people happy no matter what.
 
2011-11-13 12:55:03 AM
But his penis was ok, right?
 
2011-11-13 01:05:12 AM
Mordac Lord of Unholy Fury: Well, he doesn't have cancer now, does he? Seems to have worked.

I have a rock that repels tigers, would you like to buy it?
 
2011-11-13 01:07:29 AM
Maybe they should have sent the FIRST sample for additional testing.
Did they take any samples after the chemo and before they removed one of his organs? Seems like there should be test results for that too.

I like how they have to refer to it as an "alleged misdiagnosis" in the article. *grumble*

/Medical lab screw-ups get under my collar like little else.
 
2011-11-13 01:08:55 AM
No FUUUUUUUUUU guy?
 
2011-11-13 01:10:19 AM
Working in health the most common 'whoops we shouldn't have taken that out' I've seen is misdiagnosis of prostate cancer, resulting in removal of the prostate.

Always get a second opinion.
 
2011-11-13 01:10:35 AM
Because those doctors really farked up this guys life, even before this goes to civil court those doctors should be stripped of their license to practice medicine.
 
2011-11-13 01:18:45 AM
trappedspirit: Bathia_Mapes: In before anyone tries to blame this on socialized medicine. This has happened in the U.S. too, more than once.

I don't believe Obamacare is truly socialized.


I don't either, but there will be plenty of people who will claim cases like this will happen under the Obama Health plan because OMG SOCIALISM.

Nevermind the fact that misdiagnosed cancer cases have happened in the U.S. for years, long before "Obamacare" was even thought of. They happened during George H.W. Bush's presidency, as well as Bill Clinton's, George W. Bush, etc.

Hell, they happened when Eisenhower was President. I had a cousin who committed suicide after being told she had terminal cancer (she didn't).

She left behind her husband and a 12-year old son. She was not only afraid of the pain she would be in, but she also didn't want her husband and son to see what devastation the treatments & the cancer itself would do to her body.

The subsequent autopsy showed that she didn't have cancer.
 
2011-11-13 01:27:56 AM
GAT_00: Good news: the chemo has hugely amplified your chances of getting chemo in the next few years.

Done in three. That poor guy.
 
2011-11-13 01:31:23 AM
Where's AbbeySomeone talking about the evils of medical science? If only he went to an herbalist.

I'm still having trouble believing how they could have farked up so bad with this. They never did a biopsy?
 
2011-11-13 01:34:48 AM
See, this is what that whole thing about the USPSTF recommending against cancer screening is about (new window). Some tests for cancer suck and shouldn't be relied upon.
 
2011-11-13 01:36:18 AM
This sounds like an episode of House.
 
2011-11-13 01:46:22 AM
Keizer_Ghidorah: Mordac Lord of Unholy Fury: Well, he doesn't have cancer now, does he? Seems to have worked.

I have a rock that repels tigers, would you like to buy it?


Will it keep elephants away, too? Those things would tear up my house, and I can't afford new furniture.
 
2011-11-13 01:46:23 AM
Bathia_Mapes: trappedspirit: Bathia_Mapes: In before anyone tries to blame this on socialized medicine. This has happened in the U.S. too, more than once.

I don't believe Obamacare is truly socialized.

I don't either, but there will be plenty of people who will claim cases like this will happen under the Obama Health plan because OMG SOCIALISM.

Nevermind the fact that misdiagnosed cancer cases have happened in the U.S. for years, long before "Obamacare" was even thought of. They happened during George H.W. Bush's presidency, as well as Bill Clinton's, George W. Bush, etc.

Hell, they happened when Eisenhower was President. I had a cousin who committed suicide after being told she had terminal cancer (she didn't).

She left behind her husband and a 12-year old son. She was not only afraid of the pain she would be in, but she also didn't want her husband and son to see what devastation the treatments & the cancer itself would do to her body.

The subsequent autopsy showed that she didn't have cancer.


Alright... now, next time you hear someone talking about how they had cancer and were going to die in 4 months, they prayed and prayed to JEEESUS, or took pure Doctor Zum's Autolycated Yokibanuka Bark Tea, and next the doctors were amazed that THE CANCER HAD DISAPPEARED, and you just assume that the person's a crazy liar, maybe the INITIAL diagnosis was the crazy part.

Actually, one thing we wonder about is how often cancer goes away on its own. It's a good question because medical science rarely asks that, because once cancer is identified they usually seek to cure it, and if it goes away (which it might do anyways), that'll always be credited to treatment and we'll never observe one going away on its own. Tests are now largely confined to testing a NEW drug versus an OLD drug due to ethical concerns over nontreatment.

We see cases of ones which were not identified "until it was too late", but that doesn't prove that all early-stage cancers develop into this. In fact, it's easy to pollute statistics of success in "treating early stage cancer" if, say, 90% of a type of tiny cancerous tumor detectable by a sensitive test would have gone away on its own without treatment. You'd be able to say "it's only 50/50 survivable with treatment once it spreads to the lymph nodes and you're certain to die without treatment, but 95% survivable if we detect it as a microtumor"- which is totally saying the treatment is actually the same outcome if 90% of the early microtumors resolve themselves without treatment. Statistics geeks will understand that- you're actually better off waiting until it gets big, because the 90% of cases which resolve themselves would have you taking unnecessary drugs, of those which don't resolve themselves, they're 50/50 survivable regardless of whether treatment begins at the early or later stages.
 
2011-11-13 01:51:04 AM
Oznog: Tests are now largely confined to testing a NEW drug versus an OLD drug due to ethical concerns over nontreatment.

Nope, they use placebos. Come to think of it, I think use of placebos might actually be more common nowdays, not less.
 
2011-11-13 01:54:30 AM
People having a shared experience don't expect him to generate a very large movement.,
 
2011-11-13 02:03:58 AM
Gunther: Nope, they use placebos

cuz placebos were never used in controlled experiments in the past

pfffttt 0.5/10
 
2011-11-13 02:06:07 AM
Before we get too many "SOCIALISED MEDICINE" posts, while Gosford Hospital is a state hospital, the pathology department is almost certainly privatised.
 
2011-11-13 02:10:37 AM
Let's make sure we can stop frivolous lawsuits, because doctor's are always right and never make mistakes.
 
2011-11-13 02:13:04 AM
He should've gotten a 2nd opinion. Am I right?!
 
2011-11-13 02:17:33 AM
Then it must have been lupus.
 
2011-11-13 02:35:23 AM
if_i_really_have_to: Working in health the most common 'whoops we shouldn't have taken that out' I've seen is misdiagnosis of prostate cancer, resulting in removal of the prostate.

Always get a second opinion.


Hysterectomies are way more iffy.

The problem with prostate cancer is that it's usually detected in the 6th to 7th decade of life, and is often very slow-growing. As such, it's unlikely to be fatal, because you'll die of something else first.

This is the general rationale behind the new prostate CA screening guidelines, but the proximity of it with the ACA makes everyone think it's some death-panel conspiracy.
 
2011-11-13 02:41:17 AM
Slartibartfaster: Gunther: Nope, they use placebos

cuz placebos were never used in controlled experiments in the past

pfffttt 0.5/10


...Huh? I never said they weren't. Why on earth would you think that was a troll?
 
2011-11-13 02:46:04 AM
It has been said before, but always get a second opinion before having major work done. Really.

I don't just mean surgery. Anything that can have a significant impact on your life deserves the time and effort to be examined by more than one person.
 
2011-11-13 03:08:00 AM
I'm not seeing the downside, here.
 
2011-11-13 03:19:32 AM
He wont be ruminating long on whether to sue or not.
 
2011-11-13 03:22:37 AM
Gunther: Slartibartfaster: Gunther: Nope, they use placebos

cuz placebos were never used in controlled experiments in the past

pfffttt 0.5/10

...Huh? I never said they weren't. Why on earth would you think that was a troll?


Shut up, troll!
 
Displayed 50 of 87 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »