These idiots have no idea what Net Neutrality is thanks to retarded scare mongers like Glenn Beck.

Cements the fact that the GOP still have a firm grip on the corporate cock in their mouths.

Jake Havechek: These idiots have no idea what Net Neutrality is thanks to retarded scare mongers like Glenn Beck.

Cements the fact that the GOP still have a firm grip on the corporate cock in their mouths.

Oh, they know exactly what it is. They just use the Glenn Beck stuff to confuse their base about what they are doing and who's interest they are representing.

Why do people vote for Republicans again? God Americans are stupid.

Getting rid of net neutrality will create jobs. It just will, alright?!

The wingnuts are gonna be furious once they realize their Republicans have effectively destroyed their ability to discreetly and cheaply look at rentboy porn.

Can't wait for Anonymous and Lulsec to go after the GOP hard.

Jake Havechek: These idiots have no idea what Net Neutrality is thanks to retarded scare mongers like Glenn Beck.

Cements the fact that the GOP still have a firm grip on the corporate cock in their mouths.

They know exactly what it is. They also know that eliminating it will, with the help of their corporate masters, help them to control speech on the internet.

Now companies will be allowed to extort you for more bandwidth.

Want youtube? Fark you, pay me more.
Want ESPN.com? Fark you, pay me more.
Want FARK? Fark you, pay me more.

Verizon wants to charge customers $5 every time they want their data to receive priority on the network.

THAT is what Net Neutrality is about. Period.

Is the job of a 21st-century toll collector not a job?

Jake Havechek: These idiots have no idea what Net Neutrality is thanks to retarded scare mongers like Glenn Beck.


Yep, be prepared for an avalanche of trolls here saying to just switch ISPs if you don't like it.

Irrespective of the fact a good chunk of America has no options at all for high speed internet due to local monopolies, this has fark all to do with your ISP. This is the big boys working to squeeze out the little guys

As a thought experiment for the coming troll brigade, imagine that George Soros takes over Level3 and proceeded to send a note to Fox News demanding $100/million a year or they get prioritized below penis enlargement spam. (MSNBC traffic gets a free pass) You're ok with that, right? Because it would be perfectly fine for him to do if he's allowed to set his own traffic priorities, rather than simply agreeing to peer equally and carry all traffic without looking at the source.

Now that won't happen in reality of course. But any small competitor to one of the big guys will be crushed, instantly and effortlessly by the same methods.

"Over the past 20 years, the Internet has grown and flourished without burdensome regulations from Washington" KBH

Yeah, so why are in support letting corporations levee unnecessary regulations on the internet, you dumb old biatch?

CPennypacker: Why do people vote for Republicans again? God Americans are stupid.

I was reading an online article about the Senate vote yesterday, and in the comments section there were huge swaths of tea-tards who thought this literally meant that there was a government take over of the internet, and Fartbongo was going to order Men In Black to goosestep to private ISPs and rip the servers out of their server room.

If net neutrality ends, we'll end up with the same shiat the cable and satellite companies pull to squeeze you for more cash.

Due to willful ignorance, GOP shiatheads voted against their own interests and farked over the common man yet again.

So, same as it ever was.

Sooooo..... bof sidez R teh equally teh badz, no diffurence?

More scumbag behavior from just your republican elected officials.

InmanRoshi: CPennypacker: Why do people vote for Republicans again? God Americans are stupid.

I was reading an online article about the Senate vote yesterday, and in the comments section there were huge swaths of tea-tards who thought this literally meant that there was a government take over of the internet, and Fartbongo was going to order Men In Black to goosestep to private ISPs and rip the servers out of their server room.

Was there also a heavy flavoring of muslim/birther paranoia?

InmanRoshi: Sooooo..... bof sidez R teh equally teh badz, no diffurence?

No, DIMS are way worse because they didnt stop the gop from doing this like locking them in the closet or something! This stupidity is expected of the gop, so I'll just be angry at the dems instead!

SERIOUS QUESTION

Why are the Republicans against net neutrality. I mean, what are their stated reasons. I don't get it.

/Not trolling
//really want to know.

Republicans really, truly do not want us to have nice things.

SpectroBoy: SERIOUS QUESTION

Why are the Republicans against net neutrality. I mean, what are their stated reasons. I don't get it.

/Not trolling
//really want to know.

Because they farking hate you. That's why.

Glenn Beck does not understand net neutrality, but he fear mongers about it, anyway (new window)

Net Neutrality restricts freedom; the freedom of the telecommunications giants to restrict what you do on the internet.

CPennypacker: SpectroBoy: SERIOUS QUESTION

Why are the Republicans against net neutrality. I mean, what are their stated reasons. I don't get it.

/Not trolling
//really want to know.

Because they farking hate you. That's why.

No no no.

I don't want the REAL reason. I want the stated reason.

SpectroBoy: CPennypacker: SpectroBoy: SERIOUS QUESTION

Why are the Republicans against net neutrality. I mean, what are their stated reasons. I don't get it.

/Not trolling
//really want to know.

Because they farking hate you. That's why.

No no no.

I don't want the REAL reason. I want the stated reason.

What they are doing is protecting the interests of telecommunications conglomorates. They do this by pretending they think Net Neutrality is an internet fairness doctrine, and then making all of their idiot constituents believe them.

badhatharry: Everybody wants shiat for free.

I'll have to check my ISP bill.

*checks*

Nope, not getting internet for free. I just don't have to pay my ISP for accessing creative content they had no involvement in creating.

InmanRoshi 2011-11-11 10:31:06 AM

badhatharry: Everybody wants shiat for free.

I'll have to check my ISP bill.

*checks*

Nope, not getting internet for free. I just don't have to pay my ISP for accessing creative content they had no involvement in creating.

Like child porn.

/sorry it was just too easy

Even the Cato Institute thinks Glenn Beck is an idiot concerning net neutrality (new window)

SpectroBoy: CPennypacker: SpectroBoy: SERIOUS QUESTION

Why are the Republicans against net neutrality. I mean, what are their stated reasons. I don't get it.

/Not trolling
//really want to know.

Because they farking hate you. That's why.

No no no.

I don't want the REAL reason. I want the stated reason.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) kicked-off debate on Wednesday on a pending resolution that would express disapproval of a new FCC rule to prevent Internet service providers from picking and choosing what sort of data they will accommodate on their networks.

McConnell argued from the floor that the rule, which is set to activate on Nov. 20, represents an "overreach" of the federal government in an attempt to "fix the Internet, when the Internet is not broken."

"While we all understand the importance of an open Internet, I think we can also agree that the growth of the Internet in the last 15 years is an American success story that occurred absent any heavy-handed regulation by the federal regulators in Washington," said McConnell. "[W]e should think long and hard before we allow unelected bureaucrats to tinker with it now."

But I was really, really, really looking forward to paying more for the same service.

SpectroBoy: I don't want the REAL reason. I want the stated reason.

A "job-crushing government takeover of the Internet.

Seriously.

Headso: More scumbag behavior from just your republican elected officials.

So, both sides are bad, you say?

For the first time in a long time I had to write a senator. I gotta say, I really had high hopes for Kay Bailey. But she's failed miserably. MISERABLY.

As great as this news is, I am far more concerned that this is seeming likely to pass--- as it is far worse.

SOPA/EPARASITE (new window)