If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo) Followup Supporters of the MS "Personhood" ballot initiative say they're not going to let a little thing like the clearly and overwhelmingly expressed will of the people stop them from trying again to get the law passed in other ways   (news.yahoo.com) divider line 150
More: Followup, Christian denominations, religious community, Magic Johnson, IUD, Jay Carney, Jackson's, birth control, Personhood USA  
•       •       •

2762 clicks; posted to Politics » on 09 Nov 2011 at 2:21 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



150 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-09 12:11:45 PM
From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!
 
2011-11-09 12:16:15 PM
If fundie-'tards could be swayed by things like logic, reason, or rationality, they wouldn't still believe in their ridiculous invisible sky-wizard. They only accept their own narrow, skewed version of "reality," so they refuse to sit idly by while anyone else believes a single thing that runs counter to their hive-mind mentality. This is because they were taught WHAT to think rather than HOW to think.
 
2011-11-09 12:16:17 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!



You sound barren.
 
2011-11-09 12:25:35 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


So its the libby libruls fault that the religious fanatics trying to get this stupid law passed didn't know how to write well enough to have the law make a lick of sense.

Got it.
 
2011-11-09 12:26:26 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


What, no love for the Falcon Punch?

2/10
 
2011-11-09 12:31:20 PM
Otto's_Jacket: EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


You sound barren.


I am a guy and will never have an abortion.

/just joining in the celebration of the defeat of the amendment.

MaxxLarge: If fundie-'tards could be swayed by things like logic, reason, or rationality, they wouldn't still believe in their ridiculous invisible sky-wizard. They only accept their own narrow, skewed version of "reality," so they refuse to sit idly by while anyone else believes a single thing that runs counter to their hive-mind mentality. This is because they were taught WHAT to think rather than HOW to think.

because believing that matter suddenly generated, blew up and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star (that also spontaneously generated) where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated) got together, and somehow became a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving, but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me
 
2011-11-09 12:38:06 PM
EnviroDude: I am a guy

THEN SHUT THE FARK UP
 
2011-11-09 12:38:17 PM
EnviroDude: because believing that matter suddenly generated, blew up and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star (that also spontaneously generated) where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated) got together, and somehow became a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving, but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me

Yeah, I don't know anyone that believes that either.
 
2011-11-09 12:39:04 PM
EnviroDude: Otto's_Jacket: EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


You sound barren.

I am a guy and will never have an abortion.

/just joining in the celebration of the defeat of the amendment.

MaxxLarge: If fundie-'tards could be swayed by things like logic, reason, or rationality, they wouldn't still believe in their ridiculous invisible sky-wizard. They only accept their own narrow, skewed version of "reality," so they refuse to sit idly by while anyone else believes a single thing that runs counter to their hive-mind mentality. This is because they were taught WHAT to think rather than HOW to think.

because believing that matter suddenly generated, blew up and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star (that also spontaneously generated) where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated) got together, and somehow became a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving, but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me



Now you just sound stupid.
 
2011-11-09 12:39:27 PM
Democracy may have worked THIS time, but we'll get it next time...
 
2011-11-09 12:44:10 PM
Otto's_Jacket:
Now you just sound stupid.



Now?

It went in my ignore file its very first day. This is the type of crap that is ruining Fark, IMO.
 
2011-11-09 12:44:18 PM
EnviroDude: Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

Elighten me, why is this ambiguous?

Be it Enacted by the People of the State of Mississippi: SECTION 1. Article III of the constitution of the state of Mississippi is hereby amended BY THE ADDITION OF A NEW SECTION TO READ: Section 33. Person defined. As used in this Article III of the state constitution, "The term 'person' or 'persons' shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof." This initiative shall not require any additional revenue for implementation
 
2011-11-09 12:46:34 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

How are you going to prove that it's rape or incest?
 
2011-11-09 12:47:58 PM
Follow up question:

Section 14 of article III of the Mississippi constituion states:

SECTION 14.
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property except by due process of law.

Therefore is it only leftists who would come to the conclusion that getting rid of unwanted fetilized embryos would require a court verdict?
 
2011-11-09 12:49:14 PM
EnviroDude: because believing that matter suddenly generated, blew up and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star (that also spontaneously generated) where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated) got together, and somehow became a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving, but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me

What "suddenly", "somehow", "right", "spontaneously", "got together" looks like:

www.physics007.org

Simpler life forms becoming newer and improved life forms are not evolution. Right...

What your understanding of what physics and biology look like:

content.bored.com
 
2011-11-09 12:50:40 PM
Oh man... People are talking to EnviroDude?

LOL!
 
2011-11-09 12:53:32 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


So, because the law was vague enough to be exploited and the public recognized that and voted accordingly, the law was not passed and there is still the possibility that a more specific law that doesn't have as wide-reaching and potentially damaging consequences passing in another election?

So... you're saying the system works?

USA! USA! USA!
 
2011-11-09 12:54:23 PM
Vodka Zombie: Oh man... People are talking to EnviroDude?

LOL!


It was kind of sane for about a day, and then just spiraled downward faster than anything else.
 
2011-11-09 12:54:25 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


That dichotomy, the "we believe abortion is murder" but "Women should be allowed to have abortions in the case of rape of incest"

unravels the entire logic of the "pro-life" movement. IF abortion is murder, then you should support it being be outlawed in ALL cases (since when do we execute children for the crimes of their parents) , AND you should support criminal prosecutions for doctors that perform them AND the women who get them.

IF you can't stomach that, then you are, whether you want to admit it to yourself or not, accepting that abortion is NOT murder, no matter how much you may oppose it, and a fetus is NOT a person, even though they have the potential to become one.


Once you've crossed that line you are smack in the territory of debating not so much whether abortion shoul dbe legal, but when the cut-off date, gestationally speaking, should be. And that, BTW is what the law of the land is thanks to Roe v. Wade
 
2011-11-09 12:56:45 PM
Magorn: That dichotomy, the "we believe abortion is murder" but "Women should be allowed to have abortions in the case of rape of incest"

unravels the entire logic of the "pro-life" movement. IF abortion is murder, then you should support it being be outlawed in ALL cases (since when do we execute children for the crimes of their parents) , AND you should support criminal prosecutions for doctors that perform them AND the women who get them.


Biology unravels the entire logic of the "pro-life" movement, as long as it says life begins at conception. If life begins at conception, then nearly every sexually active woman in her life has had multiple miscarriages, that women would be committing manslaughter a few times in their lifetime just through menstration, and that our very reproductive process is a murder factory.
 
2011-11-09 12:57:40 PM
PC LOAD LETTER: What your understanding of what physics and biology look like:

Bingo:

hostmypicture.com
 
2011-11-09 12:59:18 PM
Bloody William: murder factory

Thank you for giving me the name for my new black metal band.
 
2011-11-09 01:13:05 PM
I feel dirty now...my apologizes for drawing attention to it.


Having said that, is this the right thread to ask for fetus recipes? I've got a poker game this weekend and my "finger food" joke requires a dish with a hearty tomato base.
 
2011-11-09 01:14:05 PM
Otto's_Jacket: I feel dirty now...my apologizes for drawing attention to it.


Having said that, is this the right thread to ask for fetus recipes? I've got a poker game this weekend and my "finger food" joke requires a dish with a hearty tomato base.


The best thing about the placenta is cold placenta sandwiches the next day.
 
2011-11-09 01:14:59 PM
Bloody William: Magorn: That dichotomy, the "we believe abortion is murder" but "Women should be allowed to have abortions in the case of rape of incest"

unravels the entire logic of the "pro-life" movement. IF abortion is murder, then you should support it being be outlawed in ALL cases (since when do we execute children for the crimes of their parents) , AND you should support criminal prosecutions for doctors that perform them AND the women who get them.

Biology unravels the entire logic of the "pro-life" movement, as long as it says life begins at conception. If life begins at conception, then nearly every sexually active woman in her life has had multiple miscarriages, that women would be committing manslaughter a few times in their lifetime just through menstration, and that our very reproductive process is a murder factory.


Working through a logic chain similar to that is a lot of the reason that despite Marching every January 21st in my childhood, and spending 12 years in catholic schools, I realized the rhetoric on that side of the issue just didn't hold up to scrutiny


Pro-Lifers ay they want Rpe v. Wade overturned. That decision, at its heart says that whatever the state's interest in protecting the "life" of a fetus, it doesn't outweigh the mother's right to privacy and bodily autonomy- at least not until a certain stage of her preganncy when the Fetus starts to be viable outside the womb.

Now, take away that acknowledgement of the woman's fundemental right to "privacy" and what happens?

Well the state then has an assertable interest in protecting "fetal life" from the moment of conception. Now i know of no scientific test that can state with any certainty that conception has even occurred until several weeks after the fact.

Which means if the stae were truly interested in protecting fetal life they couldn't simply impose restriction on women who are diagnosed pregnant, because that would leave that fetal life at risk for as many as 8 weeks before the mother even realizes she's pregnant. So clearly a state would be justified in imposing restrictions on ALL women of child-bearing age (maybe with exceptions for certified virgins and infertile) to protect fetuses (say banning the consumption of alcohol or tobacco, engaging stressful activities, being exposed to certain chemicals at work etc)
 
2011-11-09 01:22:02 PM
Eventually they'll get it through. Pick any article about anti-smoking laws in their infancy and they read pretty much like that one.
 
2011-11-09 01:22:06 PM
Just like Prop 8.

Dont like the result? SUE. Thats the American way! Democracy be damned
 
2011-11-09 01:44:56 PM
EnviroDude: because believing that matter suddenly generated,

No

blew up

No

and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago

13.75 ± 0.13 billion years ago

allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star

One of literally billions of likely planetoids around stars, you'd think AT LEAST one would be the "right" distance. And don't say "BUT WHY THIS ONE", because the anthropic principle stands in staunch opposition to very basic rules of cause & effect, and is therefore a crock of shiat

(that also spontaneously generated)


No

where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated)

Maybe; No

got together, and somehow became

"Biochemistry"

a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving,

I have no idea what this means

but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me


Yeah, when you make up random shiat, it tends to not make sense.
 
2011-11-09 01:56:38 PM
www.iamstaggered.com

WON'T SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE ZYGOTES?!?
 
2011-11-09 02:12:10 PM
EnviroDude: Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

Because, you know, there's nothing wrong with having laws that are really vague and ambiguous.
 
2011-11-09 02:18:12 PM
cman: Just like Prop 8.

Dont like the result? SUE. Thats the American way! Democracy be damned


So if the mob votes in something that you believe may be unconstitutional you should just live with it?
 
2011-11-09 02:19:17 PM
OregonVet: Eventually they'll get it through. Pick any article about anti-smoking laws in their infancy and they read pretty much like that one.

Ok, pick one.
 
2011-11-09 02:22:49 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Maybe they should have written it that way then!
 
2011-11-09 02:24:07 PM
They can just do what liberals do when they are defeated at the ballot box. Have an activist judge somehow find that the law is really a "right" and guaranteed by the Constitution. Like they did with the iPads.
 
2011-11-09 02:24:45 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Wait, so from your conversations "with people", an embryo is a person only in certain cases?

The people you converse with are farked up.
 
2011-11-09 02:24:45 PM
Duh, they're not going to just abort their efforts
 
2011-11-09 02:26:58 PM
RexTalionis: EnviroDude: Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

Because, you know, there's nothing wrong with having laws that are really vague and ambiguous.


Who is "the leftist" anyway? Some lame supervillian with his suit covered in left arrows?
 
2011-11-09 02:28:23 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Except that once you consider a fertilized egg a person you can't go making exceptions. It's why the whole measure was pants-on-head retarded.
 
2011-11-09 02:28:43 PM
WizardofToast: RexTalionis: EnviroDude: Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

Because, you know, there's nothing wrong with having laws that are really vague and ambiguous.

Who is "the leftist" anyway? Some lame supervillian with his suit covered in left arrows?


Aw, dammit, why couldn't you have come up with this LAST week?
 
2011-11-09 02:29:46 PM
WizardofToast: Who is "the leftist" anyway?

Easy typo. He meant to write "Leftie".

i.telegraph.co.uk
 
2011-11-09 02:29:52 PM
Nice work ED.
 
2011-11-09 02:30:07 PM
You're all a bunch of legislation killers. Have you no soul? Can't you feel the pain of an unborn bill?
 
2011-11-09 02:30:24 PM
EnviroDude: Otto's_Jacket: EnviroDude: From my conversations with people, if it were to have allowed for abortions in the case of rape, incest, health of the mother as well as invitro fertilization - it would have passed.

Because the language was vague and ambiguous, it allowed the leftist to come in and spread their interpretation of the amendment. This, was taken as gospel and the people voted accordingly.

But hey! Abortion can still be used as birth control in Mississippi! Go Pro-Choice!

USA! USA! USA!


You sound barren.

I am a guy and will never have an abortion.

/just joining in the celebration of the defeat of the amendment.

MaxxLarge: If fundie-'tards could be swayed by things like logic, reason, or rationality, they wouldn't still believe in their ridiculous invisible sky-wizard. They only accept their own narrow, skewed version of "reality," so they refuse to sit idly by while anyone else believes a single thing that runs counter to their hive-mind mentality. This is because they were taught WHAT to think rather than HOW to think.

because believing that matter suddenly generated, blew up and spread across the universe 4.5 Billion years ago allowing a small rock the "right" distance from a star (that also spontaneously generated) where chemicals and goo (brought to the rock by comets that spontaneously generated) got together, and somehow became a primitive life form that refused to reproduce after its own kind by defying physics and biology by not evolving, but becoming newer and improved life forms for millions of years. that makes perfect sense to me


It took billions of years, sport. Do you understand the probability of these events occurring on that scale? I'll give you a hint, since you obviously either failed or didn't take biology and physics. It's kind of high. In fact, on that scale, comets colliding with the planet are a certainty. The planet forming in the Goldilocks zone of our sun is mildly anomalous on that scale, but certainly not impossible. More like, semi-rare. Of course, there are billions of stars, that have existed for billions of years, and trillions of trillions of planets. You think life is special? Maybe in our little corner of the milky way. However, we're finding that life and chemistry always find a way. We found an organism with an arsenic based genome. On earth. That evolved to live in conditions no normal creature on this planet could live in. That's much more amazing to me than the idea that God designed it all specifically, put it all in place as is and hit play. If random events coming together to give us the order of the universe we see now is not cool and beautiful to you, than you really have hopelessly missed the point, and I fear you'll continue to rank below Peter Griffin on an IQ scale.
 
2011-11-09 02:32:40 PM
what_now: EnviroDude: I am a guy

THEN SHUT THE FARK UP


This.
 
2011-11-09 02:32:51 PM
WizardofToast: Who is "the leftist" anyway? Some lame supervillian with his suit covered in left arrows?

www.leftorium.com
 
2011-11-09 02:33:15 PM
what_now: EnviroDude: I am a guy

THEN SHUT THE FARK UP

EnviroDude: Account created 2011-09-26 19:43:56


He just happened to show up right around the time the League of Fail 2.0 disappeared.
 
2011-11-09 02:33:21 PM
EnviroDude: From my conversations with people,

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
2011-11-09 02:33:34 PM
Not even the bible agrees with these ultra conservatives about abortion

"And if men struggle with each other and strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there is no further injury, he shall surely be fined as the woman's husband may demand of him; and he shall pay as the judges decide. "But if there is any further injury, then you shall appoint as a penalty life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, (NAS, Exodus 21:22-24)

The LORD God formed the man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. (NIV, Genesis 2:7)
 
2011-11-09 02:35:05 PM
lordaction: They can just do what liberals do when they are defeated at the ballot box. Have an activist judge somehow find that the law is really a "right" and guaranteed by the Constitution. Like they did with the iPads.

So what you're saying is they should take someone to court to get the judge to write in a rule that abortion is now outlawed?

Even if such a case could be brought (please give me a scenario here, I'm at a loss), how would that square, stare decisis-wise, with Roe v. Wade - settled case law, which usually needs a damn fine reason to overturn (and "it makes Jesus cry" is not such a reason) - or with other protections like HIPAA?

Unless you want your favorite small government to peer into womens' medical records every week or two to look for abortions or any behavior that could be harmful to a fetus (you'd probably have to follow all these women around, as they wouldn't report every beer they drank to the doc - unless you want your small government tracking that, too), knowing that you've always got an 8(ish)-week delay between conception and knowledge of conception.

Really, how does this work? Even if you could find an activist judge to "overturn" Roe v Wade (and I'll really need a hypothetical court case that could conceivably have that be a result), how would you enforce the "clumps of cells are people too!" rules with a small government?
 
2011-11-09 02:35:44 PM
gilgigamesh: Bloody William: murder factory

Thank you for giving me the name for my new black metal band.


I'm guessing it's taken already. (Googles) Well, it's actually the name of a documentary set in Kansas City..
 
Displayed 50 of 150 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »