If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(BBC) Scary UK Ministry of Defence grounds all planes with ejector seats after one pilot acciIIIAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEE   (bbc.co.uk) divider line 32
More: Scary, Red Arrows, acciIIIAAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEEEEE, aircraft crashed, North Wales, North Yorkshire, flights, uk ministry of defence  
•       •       •

5659 clicks; posted to Main » on 09 Nov 2011 at 9:28 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



32 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
2011-11-09 09:30:04 AM
Subby owes me a keyboard.
 
2011-11-09 09:30:43 AM
I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer
 
2011-11-09 09:31:21 AM
Well, Cheerio!
 
2011-11-09 09:32:22 AM
"Sorry lads. You'll have to eject the old fashioned way while in a flight. Open your window, crawl out, and fall. good luck"
 
2011-11-09 09:33:00 AM
I am forever scarred with that impossible moment from Die Hard II, where Bruce Willis ejects from the cargo plane miraculously unscathed. I know it was fake, and I know it's just a damned movie, but whenever I picture a seat ejection in my head, that's what I see.

Closely followed by the botch job from "Top Gun".
 
2011-11-09 09:36:35 AM
thespindrifter: Closely followed by the botch job from "Top Gun".

The entire plot of that film was worthless because F-14 aircraft carried up to 6 radar-guided missiles. Pick a target, tell it to fire, and move on to the next target. 3rd-generation guided missiles, fire-and-forget technology.
 
2011-11-09 09:38:04 AM
EAGLE RIVER!?!?!?


/oblig and not obscure
//didn't eat seconds
 
2011-11-09 09:38:45 AM
 
2011-11-09 09:41:33 AM
remus: I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer


Heh. So it goes that there is no topic so esoteric that there isn't a Farker who's a subject matter expert.
 
2011-11-09 09:46:53 AM
remus: I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer


Meet yer maker with Martin-Baker!
 
2011-11-09 09:47:31 AM
I did NOT do anything wrong. The hatch just BLEW. It was a GLITCH. It was a- a TECHNICAL MALFUNCTION!

/// movie was unforgivably dishonest about Grissom.
 
2011-11-09 09:49:57 AM
I read it out loud in my head and had a good chuckAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
 
2011-11-09 09:51:38 AM
wxgeek: remus: I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer

Meet yer maker with Martin-Baker!


You owe me a new transponder and altimeter, you bastard!
 
2011-11-09 09:51:40 AM
Oh noes! Without those military aircraft in the air, how will great britain ever accomplish all the great things that are happening because all those mililitary aircraft are in the air? Well, I guess they could just put the cash directly on bonfires.

/ i am a huge fan of historical military aviation.
// as an economist, i can't think of a reason why Britain shouldn't simply never fly another military jet plane every again as of right now. they do nothing for national security or economic prosperity. nothing.
 
2011-11-09 09:58:39 AM
remus: /// use to be an ejection seat engineer

Looks like it was a problem with the MDC maybe, as a zero zero ejection itself should not be a problem?
 
2011-11-09 10:02:06 AM
OnlyM3
I did NOT do anything wrong. The hatch just BLEW. It was a GLITCH. It was a- a TECHNICAL MALFUNCTION!

/// movie was unforgivably dishonest about Grissom.


This.
Kraft & Slayton said that had he lived,Grissom would've been the 1st man on the moon.
 
2011-11-09 10:06:34 AM
Bomb Head Mohammed: Oh noes! Without those military aircraft in the air, how will great britain ever accomplish all the great things that are happening because all those mililitary aircraft are in the air? Well, I guess they could just put the cash directly on bonfires.

/ i am a huge fan of historical military aviation.
// as an economist, i can't think of a reason why Britain shouldn't simply never fly another military jet plane every again as of right now. they do nothing for national security or economic prosperity. nothing.


its just trainging flights thatbare grounded so no worries the money will still be spent
 
2011-11-09 10:06:56 AM
0/0 ejection seats, how the fark do they work?

CSB:
Playing a game of Jane's USAF. Learned you can't fly inverted at 30 feet, and survive ejection.
Also, thanks to Janes' ATF mission creator, learned B-2s don't launch from carriers very well.
 
2011-11-09 10:11:36 AM
rebelyell2006: thespindrifter: Closely followed by the botch job from "Top Gun".

The entire plot of that film was worthless because F-14 aircraft carried up to 6 radar-guided missiles. Pick a target, tell it to fire, and move on to the next target. 3rd-generation guided missiles, fire-and-forget technology.


Depends on the rules of engagment. If the clowns back in Virginia don't let you go weapons free until you've made a positive visual identification of the enemy, your 100 mile+ range missiles aren't much good. You're pretty much inside of minimums for even a sparrow launch. That leaves sidewinders and guns and manouvering.

Top Gun was filmed before AIM-120s were out and there were still a lot of unreliable AIM-7Es in the fleet. The Fs had just started coming out. Dogfighting was still a real choice, not just a last resort.

Not so CSB time:

We had a back seater (RIO) in F-4s accidentally eject himself to death on the ground. The seats have about 7 safety pins. They are all connected to each other by long fabric ribbons. They pull six of them out of the seat when the aircrew get in and stuff those six pins into a big bag that's also connected to all of the pins' ribbons. That bag goes on top of the seat with the one pin in the top of the seat still in place. That pin normally gets pulled and the whole bag stowed just before taxi.

The pilot was going through his post start up, pre flight checklist and the RIO was warming up his electronics. It started to rain so the RIO closed his canopy. Unfortunatley it came down on the pin bag and pushed the whole bag down beind the top of the seat, where all the works are.

The invesigators think what happened is the bag broke the safety cable between the seat and the canopy that's supposed to prevent the seat from firing if the canopy hasn't jettisoned. It also pulled a cable that initiated the seat. Since the canopy was still latched, the sequence wasn't complete.

The RIO opened the canopy which allowed the firing sequence to continue and it wasn't stopped by the presence of that cable between the canopy and seat; the seat fired. Since the canopy was only partly open the RIO hit the canopy structure which inflicted sever injuries. The seat continued up about a hundred feet and that's when the third malfunction occured.

The seat's parachute has what's called the "drogue gun" that functions at low altitude / low speed ejections. It is a barrel about a foot long with a lead slug in it. It's fired by a charge and that slug pulls the parachute out of the pack so it opens much faster. To bad if fired through the pin bag which stopped it and the parachute didn't open at all. The seat fell a hundred feet back to the ground.

The RIO broke everything that could be broken. He didn't die right away but he didn't linger long either.
 
2011-11-09 10:17:29 AM
Jim Panse: I don't see the malfunction. The seat did exactly what it was supposed to do.

Premature ejeculation.
 
2011-11-09 10:23:13 AM
remus: I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer


Martin-Baker is still better than some Russian designs.


/I ride on L-39 seats.
//Would much rather manually bail over the side than launch in the seat.
 
2011-11-09 10:26:16 AM
wxgeek: remus: I was never a fan of the Martin Baker seats. The ACES II has demonstrated a great track record.

/// use to be an ejection seat engineer

Meet yer maker with Martin-Baker!


I haven't heard that phrase in a couple decades. Wow, does that bring back images.
 
2011-11-09 10:36:05 AM
Wait, so the pilot had a problem with premature ejection?
 
2011-11-09 10:41:57 AM
I'll be sure to keep an eye out in the next couple of weeks to see if there's an ejection seat TD that comes out.
 
2011-11-09 10:51:33 AM
Why thank you, Andre, I'll have the veal picotta
 
2011-11-09 11:00:08 AM
www.freakingnews.com
 
2011-11-09 11:40:54 AM
thespindrifter: I am forever scarred with that impossible moment from Die Hard II, where Bruce Willis ejects from the cargo plane miraculously unscathed. I know it was fake, and I know it's just a damned movie, but whenever I picture a seat ejection in my head, that's what I see.

Closely followed by the botch job from "Top Gun".


If you look closely in a couple of shots when they're 'in the air', you can see the starwheel used when removing the seat from the a/c is still installed on the top of the seat.

CSB: In Hanger 500 at NAS Oceana, there was a dent in one of the interior roof girders. When we would give seat check outs to newbs, we would point to that and tell them that the dent was from someone who screwed up and punched in the hanger. Funny thing is, most of the time it would scare the fark out of them.

i158.photobucket.com

/Mk.GRU 7A FTW
 
2011-11-09 11:48:24 AM
Bomb Head Mohammed: Oh noes! Without those military aircraft in the air, how will great britain ever accomplish all the great things that are happening because all those mililitary aircraft are in the air? Well, I guess they could just put the cash directly on bonfires.

/ i am a huge fan of historical military aviation.
// as an economist, i can't think of a reason why Britain shouldn't simply never fly another military jet plane every again as of right now. they do nothing for national security or economic prosperity. nothing.


they're liberating Libya so the French can buy/pump/refine Libyan oil
 
2011-11-09 12:52:11 PM
I can't decide which is a funnier sound effect. The Wilhelm Scream or the Goofy scream.
 
2011-11-09 12:52:57 PM
thespindrifter: Closely followed by the botch job from "Top Gun".

GOOOOOOOOOSE THE CANOPY!
 
2011-11-09 02:27:07 PM
You didn't get the whole quote after he ejected. He was saying it was an acciAAAAAAEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIIOOOOOOUUUUUUUU and sometimes YYYYYYY!!!!
 
2011-11-10 01:27:22 PM
OnlyM3: I did NOT do anything wrong. The hatch just BLEW. It was a GLITCH. It was a- a TECHNICAL MALFUNCTION!

/// movie was unforgivably dishonest about Grissom.


It's easy to pick on the dead.
 
Displayed 32 of 32 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »