If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post) Interesting 11 least employable majors. Psychology: check. Library Science: check. Computer Administration Management: wait, what?   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 160
More: Interesting, Computer Administration Management  
•       •       •

6966 clicks; posted to Business » on 08 Nov 2011 at 5:26 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



160 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-08 03:10:40 PM
Maybe they're counting the *true* unemployment rate, which includes everyone who isn't happy with their job. This calls for further review by shadowstats.
 
2011-11-08 03:15:52 PM
If MLSs are unemployable, the world is a farkload stupider than even I thought, and I never had a very high opinion of it.
 
2011-11-08 03:19:20 PM
I wish I majored in military technologies. That sounds bad-ass.
 
2011-11-08 03:29:47 PM
i know two really successful people with MLS's, so i'm really getting a kick....
 
2011-11-08 03:38:10 PM
I like this graph:

i218.photobucket.com

/Probably made by someone in education...
 
2011-11-08 03:57:09 PM
PainInTheASP: I like this graph:

[i218.photobucket.com image 550x400]

/Probably made by someone in education...


Looks interesting enough. Smaller classes at the elementary school level don't seem to have much of an impact on high school graduation rates for the general student population, but there looks to be a pronounced correlation between the two among poor students (Federal Free Lunch eligibility is a very common way to keep track of the number of poor kids in a district). What's the problem?
 
2011-11-08 04:45:24 PM
Algebrat: PainInTheASP: I like this graph:

[i218.photobucket.com image 550x400]

/Probably made by someone in education...

Looks interesting enough. Smaller classes at the elementary school level don't seem to have much of an impact on high school graduation rates for the general student population, but there looks to be a pronounced correlation between the two among poor students (Federal Free Lunch eligibility is a very common way to keep track of the number of poor kids in a district). What's the problem?


If school lunches play a part in the graph, where is the significance explained?

Is the "Years in small class" axis supposed to signify individual classes within a given student's school year, or the entire "X-grade class" of students?

Are there any metrics outside of the free lunch "measurements" that that would point to the student's financial situation?

/Crappy ambiguous graphs are crappy.
 
2011-11-08 05:19:48 PM
PainInTheASP: Algebrat: PainInTheASP: I like this graph:

[i218.photobucket.com image 550x400]

/Probably made by someone in education...

Looks interesting enough. Smaller classes at the elementary school level don't seem to have much of an impact on high school graduation rates for the general student population, but there looks to be a pronounced correlation between the two among poor students (Federal Free Lunch eligibility is a very common way to keep track of the number of poor kids in a district). What's the problem?

If school lunches play a part in the graph, where is the significance explained?

Is the "Years in small class" axis supposed to signify individual classes within a given student's school year, or the entire "X-grade class" of students?

Are there any metrics outside of the free lunch "measurements" that that would point to the student's financial situation?

/Crappy ambiguous graphs are crappy.


To answer your first and third questions, Federal Free Lunch eligibility is by far the most accepted metric of student poverty, one that anyone with even a remote interest in public policy would immediately recognize. Any other metric would require either some questionable self-reporting or a severe invasion of privacy to collect.

As for the second question, I'm sure that whatever discussion this graph was a part of covered the exact definition. Loosely though, I can see that it's talking about small class sizes (by whatever measure) without getting my panties in a wad.

/math major
//now work in pulic budgeting
 
2011-11-08 05:32:44 PM
i wish it had some analysis of why.....
 
2011-11-08 05:38:43 PM
Sliding Carp: If MLSs are unemployable, the world is a farkload stupider than even I thought, and I never had a very high opinion of it.

The information in this list is suspect. There are a relatively small number of people pursuing those degrees, not to mention that many of the degrees are now named "information science" in order to accurately reflect the field.
 
2011-11-08 05:38:52 PM
tlchwi02: i wish it had some analysis of why.....

...because.


/Any Questions?
//If not, I'd like to break for some Free Lunch.
 
2011-11-08 05:40:23 PM
tlchwi02: i wish it had some analysis of why.....

These are all highly specialized fields, and many of them are very small compared to most other degree areas. It's not groundbreaking information.
 
2011-11-08 05:43:33 PM
Archies? I never would have guessed.
 
2011-11-08 05:55:59 PM
I know many employed and successful MLS grads. However, they were mostly middle aged women already employed in a library system looking to get a better position in their organization.

Got a kick out of hearing the pitch from a Library School about the 'graying' of the profession and that soon there would be tons of positions opening up.
 
2011-11-08 05:56:32 PM
U.S. History. Crap.

/History major
//not U.S. History
///Planning on law school for extra unemployability
 
zez
2011-11-08 05:57:33 PM
Lots of psychology majors. Maybe someone should study them to find out why they pick such useless degrees.
 
2011-11-08 05:58:21 PM
History and Geology undergrad, Distance Education and Military History grad.

Working in educational IT.

/Not US history
//Arab-Israeli Wars of the 20th century
 
2011-11-08 05:58:23 PM
Not surprisingly, these are mostly fields that increase the quality of life for others, but don't make companies big bucks.

Nothing against Engineers and Lawyers, but no poets, historians and architects makes for a shiatty society.
 
2011-11-08 06:00:07 PM
Hebalo: Not surprisingly, these are mostly fields that increase the quality of life for others, but don't make companies big bucks.

Nothing against Engineers and Lawyers, but no poets, historians and architects makes for a shiatty society.


Well, architects kinda rely on a robust building market, both residential and commercial. I can see how the downturn would really hurt those, especially if you went into them during the inflating of the bubble.
 
2011-11-08 06:00:38 PM
Algebrat: PainInTheASP: Algebrat: PainInTheASP: I like this graph:

[i218.photobucket.com image 550x400]

/Probably made by someone in education...

Looks interesting enough. Smaller classes at the elementary school level don't seem to have much of an impact on high school graduation rates for the general student population, but there looks to be a pronounced correlation between the two among poor students (Federal Free Lunch eligibility is a very common way to keep track of the number of poor kids in a district). What's the problem?

If school lunches play a part in the graph, where is the significance explained?

Is the "Years in small class" axis supposed to signify individual classes within a given student's school year, or the entire "X-grade class" of students?

Are there any metrics outside of the free lunch "measurements" that that would point to the student's financial situation?

/Crappy ambiguous graphs are crappy.

To answer your first and third questions, Federal Free Lunch eligibility is by far the most accepted metric of student poverty, one that anyone with even a remote interest in public policy would immediately recognize. Any other metric would require either some questionable self-reporting or a severe invasion of privacy to collect.

As for the second question, I'm sure that whatever discussion this graph was a part of covered the exact definition. Loosely though, I can see that it's talking about small class sizes (by whatever measure) without getting my panties in a wad.

/math major
//now work in pulic budgeting


Yeah, they cant just right out say "poor kids" or "minorities", so "eligible for federal free lunch" is the PC term
 
2011-11-08 06:01:03 PM
Architecture makes sense at the moment
 
2011-11-08 06:02:44 PM
I have a BA in History, I also make 6 figures of course I am in Sales.
 
2011-11-08 06:03:08 PM
Also known as, the "11 most likely majors among OWS protesters"
 
2011-11-08 06:03:18 PM
As someone with a BS in CompSci (not unemployed, but making less than any of you coastal/city-dwellers would even believe), any of the IT degrees other than CS or CoE come with a certain level of suspicion. As in, if you were capable of getting a conventional 4-year CS degree, you wouldn't have a degree in 'information systems'.

Of course, my state just hired a director of statewide IT (new window) with under 2 years of technology experience and his only degree from a known "mail a check, get a diploma" mill. So, degrees aren't everything.
 
2011-11-08 06:04:17 PM
I have a psych degree. I made $155K last year and will make $145K this year (albeit not in psychology).

I'm bummed that I am not employable.
 
2011-11-08 06:04:34 PM
I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.
 
2011-11-08 06:07:23 PM
Darklemming: Also known as, the "11 most likely majors among OWS protesters"
 
2011-11-08 06:08:06 PM
Hebalo: Not surprisingly, these are mostly fields that increase the quality of life for others, but don't make companies big bucks.

Nothing against Engineers and Lawyers, but no poets, historians and architects makes for a shiatty society.


Most architects aren't making grand buildings and museums, but instead shiatty mcmansions of questionable quality
 
2011-11-08 06:08:21 PM
Googling "Computer Administration Management and Security" yields basically zero results. I suspect it means managing system accounts which we have at least a dozen people doing right now. And once our last set of automation projects is completed - most of them are toast.
 
2011-11-08 06:08:40 PM
zez: Lots of psychology majors. Maybe someone should study them to find out why they pick such useless degrees.

I don't know that I believe the stats for Clinical Psychologists. Thats a PhD, and they can always teach. My college needs another full-time psych teacher to take a bunch of Developmental Psych sections (because no one else wants to teach it). Of course, anyone at the master's or higher psych level can teach too.

The I/O Psych stat is interesting too. That's generally master's level. Probably due to companies cutting back on the type of consultation that I/O Psych people do. Plenty of people going back to school that need instruction.

Basically, if you have something above a bachelor's in psych, I don't believe there's no job out there for you. It might pay $30k and require a swallowing of pride, but they're out there.

Example: ex has a master's in Counseling. Works for Sprint billing. Lots of psych majors there, apparantly. Hey, it's a job.
 
2011-11-08 06:09:10 PM
CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

No - it doesn't. Information Security has basically 0% unemployment if you can spell Information Security.
 
2011-11-08 06:09:36 PM
CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome because that degree likely won't do jack sh*t for you.
 
2011-11-08 06:12:53 PM
PressPlayOnTape: I have a psych degree. I made $155K last year and will make $145K this year (albeit not in psychology).
I'm bummed that I am not employable.


No offense, but you do realize that's the most important part of what you wrote right?
 
2011-11-08 06:13:59 PM
Cubansaltyballs: CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome because that degree likely won't do jack sh*t for you.


Plenty of law enforcement agencies in major cities would be happy to have a new recruit that's a Comp Forensics grad.

There's jobs out there for that major in the public sector. Dunno how private security is doing these days.

/looked into Computer Forensics not too long ago
 
2011-11-08 06:14:09 PM
Cubansaltyballs: Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome

Excuse me, but the University of Phoenix offers a much better degree in awesome.

*points to ink-jetted diploma*
 
2011-11-08 06:14:16 PM
Cubansaltyballs: CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome because that degree likely won't do jack sh*t for you.

I already did major in awesome. It didn't work out so well hence the majoring in computer forensics now.
 
2011-11-08 06:16:57 PM
Given how much of a need there is for counselors, psychology majors shouldn't have to worry about work. Alas plenty of Americans think there are no negative consequences ever to just sucking it up and burying emotions.
 
2011-11-08 06:19:08 PM
The Dreaded Rear Admiral: Cubansaltyballs: CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome because that degree likely won't do jack sh*t for you.

Plenty of law enforcement agencies in major cities would be happy to have a new recruit that's a Comp Forensics grad.

There's jobs out there for that major in the public sector. Dunno how private security is doing these days.

/looked into Computer Forensics not too long ago


Yeah, but a CompSci major will run circles around you given the work at hand. "The difference between an average practitioner and an excellent practitioner is an order of magnitude, not double".

Can you guess the quote without the googles? If not, you were not well educated in the field. Because of that, average at best.
 
2011-11-08 06:19:15 PM
Dextro: PressPlayOnTape: I have a psych degree. I made $155K last year and will make $145K this year (albeit not in psychology).
I'm bummed that I am not employable.

No offense, but you do realize that's the most important part of what you wrote right?


No necessarily, assuming he got his present position (or gets clients) in part or in whole due to his psych degree.
 
2011-11-08 06:27:30 PM
rohar: The Dreaded Rear Admiral: Cubansaltyballs: CZMisfitsFan: I'm majoring in Computer Forensics. Is that under Computer security? If so, then dammit.

Might as well go to ITT and major in awesome because that degree likely won't do jack sh*t for you.

Plenty of law enforcement agencies in major cities would be happy to have a new recruit that's a Comp Forensics grad.

There's jobs out there for that major in the public sector. Dunno how private security is doing these days.

/looked into Computer Forensics not too long ago

Yeah, but a CompSci major will run circles around you given the work at hand. "The difference between an average practitioner and an excellent practitioner is an order of magnitude, not double".

Can you guess the quote without the googles? If not, you were not well educated in the field. Because of that, average at best.


I'm not a CompForensics major so I don't have a dog in the fight. I just said that there are jobs for them. Example: I was on a kick for a while where I wanted to go into the NYPD. Their TARU unit was looking for a few good CompForensics grads at the time.

Not saying that CompSci majors don't have more options. But it's more general. If you're specifically looking for a job in law enforcement, you could do worse than CompForensics.

As for your quote, I admit that I don't know the source, although I have heard variations before. I suppose that makes me average. Google doesn't help. Sounds like something an economist would say.
 
2011-11-08 06:28:35 PM
Cyno01: Algebrat: PainInTheASP: Algebrat: PainInTheASP:

Yeah, they cant just right out say "poor kids" or "minorities", so "eligible for federal free lunch" is the PC term


Odd, my kids are white and middle class. They qualified for the program last year when my wife and I were both working but don't this year now that she's a SAHM. Predominately white Florida coastal school near a military base with >70% qualifying for the program. The barrier for entry must be pretty low.
 
2011-11-08 06:33:26 PM
architecture has been hit really really hard, and graduates have never been very highly paid for the first 5-10 years of their career anyways.

Someone on a summer internship in engineering will make more money than an architecture graduate, at least where I live.
 
2011-11-08 06:37:09 PM
Add nursing to that in a few years. Talk about career bubbles!

But IT has been under attack for the last few years. The hours suck, the work is hard, and you really don't have a life. As for library science, it's because most austerity programs today are feasting on libraries.

The only thing this article is saying is 'we need more jobs to take advantage of our highly educated workforce' rather than 'your degree is unimportant.' Then again, the media is trending towards a stupider workforce while pushing the idea that college should be all about training for corporations instead of expanding knowledge.
 
2011-11-08 06:37:28 PM
An undergrad in psych is worthless on it's own. It's a stepping stone to either another degree or a masters. If you consider it in that regard, it's actually a pretty useful degree to have. I'd say it's generally a good idea to have a basic understanding of clinical science as well as basic human psychology and physiology of the brain. If nothing else, it's interesting.

/But damn near worthless on it's own.
//My GF has a pysch degree.
///She's getting ready to start a masters program in Human/Computer Interaction.
 
2011-11-08 06:40:28 PM
Ridiculous. My Sociology degree is FAR more unemployable than ANY of these.
 
2011-11-08 06:41:23 PM
Hebalo: Not surprisingly, these are mostly fields that increase the quality of life for others, but don't make companies big bucks.

Nothing against Engineers and Lawyers, but no poets, historians and architects makes for a shiatty society.


Yeah, that makes for a great life, lots of poets and historians. Call me when your Robert Frost gets 3G. Tech, industry and business makes society, poets give a very small segment of society something to talk about.
/No offense against ALL poets.
//Just most.
 
2011-11-08 06:50:30 PM
Psych major here. Always been employed, not in psychology, obviously. It's a good intro to the scientific method/scientific reasoning without having to dissect frogs or mix smelly chemicals or memorize physics equations (though I did all three for no apparent reason). I'm surprised at the I/O Psychology stat because a lot of companies are embracing this whole Six Sigma crapola (yeah, it's crap. I said it.) and the "efficiency experts" who use the Six Sigma tools are engineers or I/O people.

Cool story, bro?
 
2011-11-08 07:00:37 PM
Barakku: Hebalo: Not surprisingly, these are mostly fields that increase the quality of life for others, but don't make companies big bucks.

Nothing against Engineers and Lawyers, but no poets, historians and architects makes for a shiatty society.

Yeah, that makes for a great life, lots of poets and historians. Call me when your Robert Frost gets 3G. Tech, industry and business makes society, poets give a very small segment of society something to talk about.
/No offense against ALL poets.
//Just most.


Yeah, cuz people never need any outlets to express themselves or anything. Poetry, writing, painting, acting, music, cross-stitch, jewelry making, historical reenactments... all totally worthless. Yep. Enjoy your hardened arteries and inflexible neurons.

Also, think about the creativity that goes on in advertising, product packaging, retail space design, that kind of thing.
 
2011-11-08 07:08:28 PM
praymantis 2011-11-08 06:02:44 PM
"I have a BA in History, I also make 6 figures of course I am in Sales."

Pray tell, wtf do you sell?

/ hookers
// blow
 
2011-11-08 07:10:54 PM
PressPlayOnTape Edit/Remove Favorite UserAdd Favorite User Quote 2011-11-08 06:04:17 PM Edit/unIgnore User Ignore User
"I have a psych degree. I made $155K last year and will make $145K this year (albeit not in psychology).

I'm bummed that I am not employable."

Pray tell, wtf do you do?
 
Displayed 50 of 160 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »