If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(News Hounds) Sick Toe sucker Dick Morris about Cain accuser Sharon Bialek: "I look forward to her spread in Playboy"   (newshounds.us) divider line 89
More: Sick  
•       •       •

1215 clicks; posted to Politics » on 08 Nov 2011 at 9:48 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



89 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-08 09:50:23 AM
What a shiatbag. I wonder if he has any women in his family (mother, wife and daughter) because I would have a hard time being such a disgusting sexist pig and look them in the face if I was him.
 
2011-11-08 09:50:33 AM
Stay classy Go fark yourself, GOP.
 
2011-11-08 09:51:22 AM
I just threw up in my mouth a little
 
2011-11-08 09:52:26 AM
Morris is a slimy little whoremonger, ain't he?

How can his wife stand being near him?
 
2011-11-08 09:52:33 AM
Is he going to suck on the pages?
 
2011-11-08 09:54:14 AM
He's such a creepy little troll. I bet the hookers who did him took hour long hot showers afterwords.
 
2011-11-08 09:57:55 AM
Has Dick Morris seen a playboy? Has Dick Morris seen Sharon?

I am willing to bet Dick Morris hasn't seen at least one of these.
 
2011-11-08 09:58:03 AM
For the party that claims to be big on morals, why aren't they going after Cain... or at least why are they defending him? I guess immoral acts are OK if you are a Republican.
 
2011-11-08 09:58:45 AM
On August 29, 1996, Morris resigned from the Clinton campaign after reports surfaced that he had been involved with a prostitute. A tabloid newspaper had obtained and published a set of photographs of Morris and the woman on a Washington, D.C., hotel balcony. The Daily Telegraph reported that in order to impress the woman, Sherry Rowlands, Morris invited her to listen in on conversations with the President. The Telegraph also alleged that Morris had a preference for "toe-sucking and dominance," and that he regaled Rowlands with a version of "Popeye the Sailor Man," performed in his underpants.
 
2011-11-08 09:59:45 AM
Well, that was my 4th greenlight. Average 1 every 2.5 years.. though I don't submit many these days.
 
2011-11-08 10:01:34 AM
They just don't want any women voting for them ever again do they?
 
2011-11-08 10:02:36 AM
I'm glad we live in the year 2011 where gender equality has been realized and women can speak out about sexual harassment without being slut shamed in the national media

wait
 
2011-11-08 10:09:07 AM
Playboy? Nah...

This is a Gloria Allred production and her clients are usually better suited for fine publications like Swank
 
2011-11-08 10:09:54 AM
She ugly.
 
2011-11-08 10:15:10 AM
I think the article I read had the count at 4 rich men she has tried to soak for something.....

Cain, some spaniard named Concha, some guy who works for the White Sox, and her current fiance who supports her financially.

She has declared bankruptcy twice, has worked in television and radio and for political organizations and lobbying groups like the national restaurant association.

This is what Monica Lewinsky was in training for.

Politicians encourage a sort of a class of women who migrate back and forth between entertainment and government work so they have people to fark in the office.

If she had any other illusions about the nature of her involvement with all these organizations and the men who operate them then she was as dumb as she looks.
 
2011-11-08 10:17:57 AM
archichris: I think the article I read had the count at 4 rich men she has tried to soak for something.....

Cain, some spaniard named Concha, some guy who works for the White Sox, and her current fiance who supports her financially.

She has declared bankruptcy twice, has worked in television and radio and for political organizations and lobbying groups like the national restaurant association.

This is what Monica Lewinsky was in training for.

Politicians encourage a sort of a class of women who migrate back and forth between entertainment and government work so they have people to fark in the office.

If she had any other illusions about the nature of her involvement with all these organizations and the men who operate them then she was as dumb as she looks.


"Blame the victim", huh? What makes you think this will work this time?
 
2011-11-08 10:17:58 AM
It's a really safe bet to immediately dislike anybody Dick Morris defends.
 
2011-11-08 10:22:54 AM
hugram: For the party that claims to be big on morals, why aren't they going after Cain... or at least why are they defending him? I guess immoral acts are OK if you are a Republican.

Because it isnt a monolothic party? There are all kinds of conservatives and only one or two kinds care about a persons sex life.

Also you may have heard something about the conservative movement distrusting the media? I wonder why that is? Could it be that every republican candidate since Regan has been viciously attacked by the media for all sorts of kooky things. At first of course many people trusted the news....but when Potatoe Gate broke and the truth came out we realized we were being played by a group of liberals with no qualms about slanting the news. So lets look at a couple of comparisons.....

Kathleen Willey.......3 news stories, credible evidence that Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her and then sent operatives to threaten her

Juanita Broderick......3 news stories, claimed that Bill Clinton raped her (I dont have any info on the credibility of the rape accusation but im willing to bet it was more than just anonymous unnamed accusers)

Paula Jones....1 news story, could describe Clintons wedding Tackle in detail.

The news story count is from the initial reporting period. Guess how many stories on Cain were run BEFORE Bialick even stepped forward? Over 60.......

Thats what you call a slight credibility gap in the Medias claim of fairness.
 
2011-11-08 10:26:46 AM
Jake Havechek: archichris: I think the article I read had the count at 4 rich men she has tried to soak for something.....

Cain, some spaniard named Concha, some guy who works for the White Sox, and her current fiance who supports her financially.

She has declared bankruptcy twice, has worked in television and radio and for political organizations and lobbying groups like the national restaurant association.

This is what Monica Lewinsky was in training for.

Politicians encourage a sort of a class of women who migrate back and forth between entertainment and government work so they have people to fark in the office.

If she had any other illusions about the nature of her involvement with all these organizations and the men who operate them then she was as dumb as she looks.

"Blame the victim", huh? What makes you think this will work this time?


Victim implies that she was unwilling and uninformed and did not intend to trade sexual favors for access. Since she has apparently, according to Concha, engaged in a sexual relationship that benefited her financially without any intent to repay money she borrowed, I would have to say that she isnt a Victim at all, but rather someone who cynically pursues men for financial gain.

To quote the orignal victim blamer ""Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find." �James Carville, after Paula Jones made a sexual harassment allegation against Bill Clinton
 
2011-11-08 10:28:45 AM
archichris: Politicians encourage a sort of a class of women

You're saying she's telling the truth and, obviously, Cain is not.
 
2011-11-08 10:34:54 AM
archichris: Also you may have heard something about the conservative movement distrusting the media?

In my experience, this is exactly opposite reality. Every conservative I know pretty much accepts without question any brain-dead crap they hear - as long as it comes from Rush Limbaugh or a Fox News talking head.
 
2011-11-08 10:40:24 AM
archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?
 
2011-11-08 10:50:01 AM
I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.
 
2011-11-08 11:00:05 AM
macil22: I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.

So you think he didn't sexually harass anyone?
 
2011-11-08 11:03:07 AM
I can't wait to see the Daily Show splice clips of these assholes demeaning this woman, and downplaying what Cain did with clips of them reacting the Weanergate.
 
2011-11-08 11:03:08 AM
Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?


After drudge blew the lid off the whole thing there was no choice anymore and they started running stories relentlessly...it doesn't change the fact that they tried to keep a lid on it for a couple years.
 
2011-11-08 11:08:30 AM
mrshowrules: macil22: I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.

So you think he didn't sexually harass anyone?


I have no reason to think that he did. There were 3 anonymous reports that went on and on in the media. No description of what actually took place, no names or faces of the women involved. No agreement had been made with Cain, only with the restaurant association after Cain left. The paltry sums the women were paid indicate that their claims were baseless and it was just something to pay them to make them go away.

Now a 4th women who was unemployed was dug up by Gloria Allred of all people...yeah no thanks I'm not buying it. It is just a hit job. And of course the media doesn't care to ask her why she lost her job in the first place. So much missing information, but we are supposed to be angry at Cain because some woman claims that he did something? And she offered no proof so why should someone be condemned based on someone else's testimony, didn't we learn anything from the Duke case?
 
2011-11-08 11:10:37 AM
spiderpaz: I can't wait to see the Daily Show splice clips of these assholes demeaning this woman, and downplaying what Cain did with clips of them reacting the Weanergate.

Wiener actually did something though...We don't know that Cain did anything.
 
2011-11-08 11:18:29 AM
macil22: Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?

After drudge blew the lid off the whole thing there was no choice anymore and they started running stories relentlessly...it doesn't change the fact that they tried to keep a lid on it for a couple years.


The Paula Jones stories started getting run in the early 90s. Drudge broke the Lewinsky story in 98.
Thus, Jones was getting coverage well before your rationalization claims it does.

Why are you a lying liar who lies?
 
2011-11-08 11:22:24 AM
macil22: mrshowrules: macil22: I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.

So you think he didn't sexually harass anyone?

I have no reason to think that he did. There were 3 anonymous reports that went on and on in the media. No description of what actually took place, no names or faces of the women involved. No agreement had been made with Cain, only with the restaurant association after Cain left. The paltry sums the women were paid indicate that their claims were baseless and it was just something to pay them to make them go away.

Now a 4th women who was unemployed was dug up by Gloria Allred of all people...yeah no thanks I'm not buying it. It is just a hit job. And of course the media doesn't care to ask her why she lost her job in the first place. So much missing information, but we are supposed to be angry at Cain because some woman claims that he did something? And she offered no proof so why should someone be condemned based on someone else's testimony, didn't we learn anything from the Duke case?


You would go out of business really fast. Anyone can say "he tried to butt rape me!" and then ask for a handout, and that business owner would go bankrupt real fast if he has to pay out for every claim. Now, if someone has evidence, there is a good reason to pay someone to STFU.
 
2011-11-08 11:29:05 AM
stoli n coke: macil22: Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?

After drudge blew the lid off the whole thing there was no choice anymore and they started running stories relentlessly...it doesn't change the fact that they tried to keep a lid on it for a couple years.

The Paula Jones stories started getting run in the early 90s. Drudge broke the Lewinsky story in 98.
Thus, Jones was getting coverage well before your rationalization claims it does.

Why are you a lying liar who lies?


Your average person didn't know who Paula Jones was until after the Lewinsky story broke.
 
2011-11-08 11:29:58 AM
Oh come on! Like posing for Playboy isn't logical, precedented step?

Paula Jones (new window)
 
2011-11-08 11:33:15 AM
macil22: stoli n coke: macil22: Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?

After drudge blew the lid off the whole thing there was no choice anymore and they started running stories relentlessly...it doesn't change the fact that they tried to keep a lid on it for a couple years.

The Paula Jones stories started getting run in the early 90s. Drudge broke the Lewinsky story in 98.
Thus, Jones was getting coverage well before your rationalization claims it does.

Why are you a lying liar who lies?

Your average person moron or person born after 1990 didn't know who Paula Jones was until after the Lewinsky story broke.


She was the second person to really gain attention after Jennifer Flowers and the most high profile one after Clinton got elected. She was a regular kicking post for Leno and Letterman for about five years before Lewinsky.

Just because you're an idiot, don't make the assumption that half the population is as dumb as you are.
 
2011-11-08 11:34:10 AM
Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?


I was alive at the time. Paula Jones was excoriated as a trailer trash gold digger that should have never impugned the integrity of the president. After all, he was a democrat president and sexual harassment didn't apply to him like it did to Justice Thomas, a conservative neanderthal.

Why is this important? Because Clinton spent millions to keep her out of the courts. He lied. He got others to lie. And when he was found out, he was found guilty of obstruction of justice. That may not seem like a big deal, but when you use the power of the government to get your way, it is.

So I would rethink what you have written. If you are intellectually honest then you would see that the left is doing what the left has always done to the right. And if it were a democrat candidate (remember how many people reported on John Edwards - it was the national enquirer that scooped the leftists on that one), you would rejoice in knowing that they had your backside.
 
2011-11-08 11:34:17 AM
macil22: Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?

After drudge blew the lid off the whole thing there was no choice anymore and they started running stories relentlessly...it doesn't change the fact that they tried to keep a lid on it for a couple years.


You're lying.

Drudge Report was started in 1997.

Key stories from the Washington Post (new window)

Clinton Tried to Derail Troopers' Sex Allegations
December 21, 1993
President Clinton and other administration officials engaged in an extensive effort to prevent publication of allegations that Clinton as governor of Arkansas used his security detail to facilitate extramarital affairs.

Paula Jones and a House Divided
June 9, 1994
Paula Corbin Jones's sister maintains that Jones was tickled, not traumatized, by the encounter with the future president. The Corbin family has split into the same good vs. bad, no-subtlety-in-the-telling camps that have added to the burlesque of Jones's life.

State Trooper Rebuts Jones's Sex Allegations
June 11, 1994
Arkansas state trooper Danny Ferguson disputed key allegations in Paula Corbin Jones's lawsuit against President Clinton, saying in court documents that Jones had praised Clinton as sexy, volunteered her phone number and offered to be his girlfriend.

Clinton Offered to Settle Lawsuit
October 2, 1994
In a settlement offer in the Paula Corbin Jones sexual harassment case, President Clinton conceded that he may have met the woman in a hotel room and said he regretted "untrue assertions" made about her.
 
2011-11-08 11:35:43 AM
coeyagi: macil22: mrshowrules: macil22: I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.

So you think he didn't sexually harass anyone?

I have no reason to think that he did. There were 3 anonymous reports that went on and on in the media. No description of what actually took place, no names or faces of the women involved. No agreement had been made with Cain, only with the restaurant association after Cain left. The paltry sums the women were paid indicate that their claims were baseless and it was just something to pay them to make them go away.

Now a 4th women who was unemployed was dug up by Gloria Allred of all people...yeah no thanks I'm not buying it. It is just a hit job. And of course the media doesn't care to ask her why she lost her job in the first place. So much missing information, but we are supposed to be angry at Cain because some woman claims that he did something? And she offered no proof so why should someone be condemned based on someone else's testimony, didn't we learn anything from the Duke case?

You would go out of business really fast. Anyone can say "he tried to butt rape me!" and then ask for a handout, and that business owner would go bankrupt real fast if he has to pay out for every claim. Now, if someone has evidence, there is a good reason to pay someone to STFU.


No you just don't understand how business works. When people complain it is usually easier to give them a hand out to stop them from crying to the next higher up or to keep them from making a public stink which could be more costly in the long run. Obviously if everyone showed up and started making false claims they wouldn't be able to pay people off, fortunately that is not how the world seems to work.

It is like that at every level though. Next time you order a pizza eat the whole thing expect for one piece of crust, then go back to the store with it and complain that he pizza was cold when you got it and it didn't taste as good as usual. They will apologize, if they don't ask for the manager, don't accept an apology stick to your complaint and you will end up getting a voucher for a free pizza. If you don't call their corporate office and you will probably get a envelope full of free coupons. It is cheaper and easier to pay people off at the lowest levels of the chain possible. People do stuff like this in every type of business all the time.
 
2011-11-08 11:36:26 AM
EnviroDude: Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?

I was alive at the time. Paula Jones was excoriated as a trailer trash gold digger that should have never impugned the integrity of the president. After all, he was a democrat president and sexual harassment didn't apply to him like it did to Justice Thomas, a conservative neanderthal.


Nice deflection.

Are you denying that there was constant news coverage of the whole thing, starting with her lawsuit in 1993?
 
2011-11-08 11:42:01 AM
So, we're down to "Cain is innocent because Clinton was guilty" and "Most people didn't read/watch the hundreds of Paula Jones stories from 1993-1998 and that's the fault of the media."

Seriously? That's all you've got? Sure, you get points for deflection, but it helps if you don't use claims that are refuted by 5 seconds on Google.

/Meet the new trolls
//same as the old trolls.
 
2011-11-08 11:51:12 AM
me too
 
2011-11-08 11:51:36 AM
EnviroDude: So I would rethink what you have written. If you are intellectually honest then you would see that the left is doing what the left has always done to the right.

Intellectual honesty...from someone who goes from talking about the the right-wing promoted Paula Jones allegations to blaming the left for smearing Cain, even though Herman Cain is blaming Rick Perry's campaign for these accusations (new window).

As the scandal surrounding Herman Cain's alleged sexual harassment problem takes on a life of its own, the former pizza titan is hitting back with accusations that the story was a hit job from Rick Perry's campaign.

In an interview with Forbes today, Cain said he is absolutely certain the story was leaked by Curt Anderson, a big-time Washington media consultant who recently joined the Perry campaign. Incidentally, Anderson also worked on Cain's failed 2004 Senate campaign.


Seriously, try to keep up with reality.
 
2011-11-08 11:54:08 AM
macil22: It is like that at every level though. Next time you order a pizza eat the whole thing expect for one piece of crust, then go back to the store with it and complain that he pizza was cold when you got it and it didn't taste as good as usual. They will apologize, if they don't ask for the manager, don't accept an apology stick to your complaint and you will end up getting a voucher for a free pizza. If you don't call their corporate office and you will probably get a envelope full of free coupons. It is cheaper and easier to pay people off at the lowest levels of the chain possible. People do stuff like this in every type of business all the time.

Because some free pizza vouchers = paying 6 figures to keep a woman's mouth shut.

If handing out free money is your cost of doing business, then you're a shiatty businessman.
 
2011-11-08 11:57:21 AM
macil22: mrshowrules: macil22: I this Dick Morris is a scumbbag but even still I agree with him here. Once I saw Gloria Allred there was no point in evening listening to what she has to say. Any and all credibility was lost instantly.

So you think he didn't sexually harass anyone?

I have no reason to think that he did. There were 3 anonymous reports that went on and on in the media. No description of what actually took place, no names or faces of the women involved. No agreement had been made with Cain, only with the restaurant association after Cain left. The paltry sums the women were paid indicate that their claims were baseless and it was just something to pay them to make them go away.

Now a 4th women who was unemployed was dug up by Gloria Allred of all people...yeah no thanks I'm not buying it. It is just a hit job. And of course the media doesn't care to ask her why she lost her job in the first place. So much missing information, but we are supposed to be angry at Cain because some woman claims that he did something? And she offered no proof so why should someone be condemned based on someone else's testimony, didn't we learn anything from the Duke case?


No credibility on the people who don't come forward and no credibility on those who do. Got it. Have you heard of Occam's Razor?
 
2011-11-08 12:00:58 PM
Actually, Jones claimed that the harassment occurred in May 1991. She did nothing about it, said nothing to the press, and was, therefore, impossible to cover. However, her first name, Paula, was exposed when the "Troopergate" story broke in the American Spectator, in 1993. Paula Jones then went into the public and claimed that the Paula mentioned in the articles, the Paula that the troopers say wanted to be Clinton's girlfriend, was her. In May 1994, two days before the 3 year statute of limitations was up, she filed her sexual harassment suit. Her first set of attorneys quit when it became clear that Jones seemed to have unrealistic expectations on the value of her case. Her case was dismissed in court when she could not show damages, and was being appealed when the suit was finally settled. The amount of settlement just covered the cost of her attorneys. She later posed for Penthouse. David Brock, who wrote the first stories on Troopergate, has since apologized because the troopers had been paid for their story, and clearly were lying about much of what they claimed to have witnessed. Interestingly, she sued one of the troopers, Ferguson, for defamation, based on his saying she asked to be Clinton's boyfriend. That suit she dismissed herself. She seems to actually have believed that she could get Clinton kicked out of office and was entitled to millions in damages for what occurred to her, which is why she ended up penniless and in Penthouse. She believed Rgiht-wing hype machine, to her detriment.
 
2011-11-08 12:02:03 PM
macil22: hey will apologize, if they don't ask for the manager, don't accept an apology stick to your complaint and you will end up getting a voucher for a free pizza. If you don't call their corporate office and you will probably get a envelope full of free coupons. It is cheaper and easier to pay people off at the lowest levels of the chain possible. People do stuff like this in every type of business all the time.

So these 4 women are all just sleazy biatches working the system?
 
2011-11-08 12:07:31 PM
archichris: If she had any other illusions about the nature of her involvement with all these organizations and the men who operate them then she was as dumb as she looks.

It is usually the victim's fault.
 
2011-11-08 12:08:14 PM
Another Great American, according to Hannity...
 
2011-11-08 12:18:34 PM
It has been funny seeing toe sucking whoremonger Morris and pervert O'Reilly moaning about Cain getting a raw deal.
 
2011-11-08 12:21:18 PM
There are some truly disgusting posts here. Congratulations to all the sexual harassment apologists. I hope the boss tries to finger fark your mom/daughter/wife at work tomorrow.

Basically, let me summarize on whose fault it is:

1) Liberal media
2) Rick Perry
3) racism
4) over sensitive women
5) slutty women
6) con-women
7) anonymous women
8) greedy/lazy women

All we know for certain is that Cain didn't do anything inappropriate and all claims are baseless.
 
2011-11-08 12:27:42 PM
Mager: archichris: Paula Jones....1 news story

This is how I know you're a lying shiatbag.

One news story on Paula Jones? Really? Were you alive during that time?


"and when Paula Jones went public in February of '94, only ABC gave her sixteen seconds. The other networks did nothing until Bill Clinton got a defense attorney in May of that year."

Theres my info.
 
2011-11-08 12:28:19 PM
Ctrl-Alt-Del: archichris: Also you may have heard something about the conservative movement distrusting the media?

In my experience, this is exactly opposite reality. Every conservative I know pretty much accepts without question any brain-dead crap they hear - as long as it comes from Rush Limbaugh or a Fox News talking head.


That only tells me that you are prejudiced.
 
Displayed 50 of 89 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »