I like the one where she is playing with her pussy (new window).

I don't know what she's selling and I'm pretty sure I don't want it.

But I'll take three.

Not hot.

/she has too much of a pretentious "look at me, I'm hot" attitude.

//Lives in O.C.; I guess I'm too spoiled by all of the actual hot women around here.

///Not that thats a bad thing.

FishyFred: GODDAMMIT, WE JUST GOT OVER ELEVATORGATE AND NOW THIS THREAD IS GOING TO CONQUER THE ATHEIST BLOGOSPHERE FOR ANOTHER FARKING MONTH.

1) Stop putting gate at the end of every damn thing. There is no way in which an insensitive, possibly drunk guy, alone with a woman he doesn't know well in an elevator at 2 in the night asking her if she will come to his room "for coffee", is like the White House hiring thieves to break into a competing candidate's offices and steal vital information.

2)This is Fark. Fark is scarcely part of "The Atheist blogosphere". I doubt writers such as PZ Myers, Pandagon, and the like are going to be shocked to their core by the concept that a handful of Farkers are making objectifying comments in their threads about an atheist youtuber's breasts. In fact, I can pretty much guarantee that, while they probably find it aggravating and maybe disgusting, that's exactly what they, and any one on the internet with any idea what Fark is, expect us to do. Being sarcastic, crude, and flippant is why folks come here.

Somacandra: FTFA: How could faith ever be something of value?...Faith is not a helpful component of human progress

Oh yes. What would religious people like Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Anne Frank, Pema Chodron, the Dalai Lama, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Dr. Ingrid Mattson, Thich Nhat Hanh and Starhawk know about life and its travails? And none of them even had to show their girls off with a low-cut top on Youtube to get someone's attention. What a concept!

She's right though: the progress that (e.g.) King and X brought about are independent of any religious faith or affiliation. Just because they used religious language to advocate for their goals doesn't mean those goals were religious. They could have accomplished the same goals using secular language.

BTW, I've never seen anyone use Anne Frank as support for the conclusion that religion is a salutary force in an individual's life.

Come? But I already did.

Whatever the hell she's saying, I can't stand it.

Even though I probably agree with it.