If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(PhysOrg.com) Spiffy Microbiologists open a molecular can of whoopass on lymphoma cells   (physorg.com) divider line 15
More: Spiffy, microbiologists, lymphomas, kiosks, peptides, tumor suppressors, small molecule, cell death, regression  
•       •       •

2175 clicks; posted to Geek » on 06 Nov 2011 at 11:15 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



15 Comments   (+0 »)
   
 
2011-11-06 08:24:59 PM
Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.
 
2011-11-06 09:54:45 PM
Cubansaltyballs: Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.

More like, "let the bidding war begin". Pharma's are switching to a model where the academic researchers do the basic research and then work with pharmas to get it through clinical trials.
 
2011-11-06 10:00:25 PM
Still no cure for....oh wait.
 
2011-11-06 10:19:44 PM
Walker: Still no cure for....oh wait.

a molecular can of whoopass

still no cure from can, sir.
 
2011-11-06 10:30:21 PM
greentea1985: Cubansaltyballs: Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.

More like, "let the bidding war begin". Pharma's are switching to a model where the academic researchers do the basic research and then work with pharmas to get it through clinical trials.


That only applies to the treatments that take months/years to administer. If there's a pill that cures cancer, they will destroy it because they'll only be able to make $500 instead of $150,000.
 
2011-11-06 10:55:15 PM
Here's hoping it works. My husband's friend has lymphoma- she's only 36. We're going to get tested for a bone marrow transplant but it's a long shot. :/ Cancer sucks.
 
2011-11-06 11:26:19 PM
As a lymphoma survivor, I'm getting a kick out of these replies...

/ Seriously, this is good news
// Hope your husband's friend is hanging in there, Coco Ebert
 
2011-11-06 11:41:27 PM
Generic Fark Name: As a lymphoma survivor, I'm getting a kick out of these replies...

/ Seriously, this is good news
// Hope your husband's friend is hanging in there, Coco Ebert


She's doing well, thanks, and good to hear you're doing well. :)
 
2011-11-07 12:04:20 AM
Cubansaltyballs: greentea1985: Cubansaltyballs: Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.

More like, "let the bidding war begin". Pharma's are switching to a model where the academic researchers do the basic research and then work with pharmas to get it through clinical trials.

That only applies to the treatments that take months/years to administer. If there's a pill that cures cancer, they will destroy it because they'll only be able to make $500 instead of $150,000.


Yeah, companies would hate to have an effective cure for cancer *rolls eyes*
 
2011-11-07 12:10:41 AM
greentea1985

Cubansaltyballs: Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.

More like, "let the bidding war begin". Pharma's are switching to a model where the academic researchers do the basic research and then work with pharmas to get it through clinical trials.


Switching to?

An enormous amount of basic research has been done either at the NIH or in labs funded by it since it's founding.

How many "NIH Brand" pharmaceuticals do you know of?
 
2011-11-07 12:19:02 AM
an enzyme that cleaves the normally occurring protein ubiquitin from substrates like p53

I wonder where they might find this ubiquitin protein......?
 
2011-11-07 12:35:24 AM
Generic Fark Name: As a lymphoma survivor, I'm getting a kick out of these replies...

/ Seriously, this is good news
// Hope your husband's friend is hanging in there, Coco Ebert



Good luck from another lymphoma survivor.

And to be honest, if "Big Pharma" makes a few bucks on the deal, its alright with me.
 
2011-11-07 12:41:56 AM
I lost a dear friend to lymphoma.

Please, science. Kick lymphoma in the ass and dick and balls.
 
2011-11-07 01:29:31 AM
This is a promising finding. There are potential side effects from causing cell death in surrounding tissues due to an effective overdose of p53, and it wouldn't work on cancers caused by a breakdown in the production of p53 (rather than an up-regulation of p53 degredation) but any progress is a good thing.

Here's hoping some of the promising findings can actually be brought to the level of useful for human treatment.
 
2011-11-07 06:58:00 AM
maxheck: greentea1985

Cubansaltyballs: Big Pharma, start your engines. This must be destroyed at all costs.

More like, "let the bidding war begin". Pharma's are switching to a model where the academic researchers do the basic research and then work with pharmas to get it through clinical trials.

Switching to?

An enormous amount of basic research has been done either at the NIH or in labs funded by it since it's founding.

How many "NIH Brand" pharmaceuticals do you know of?


Well, heres the process. A lab at a major university makes an interesting discovery that could be sold for money. The lab takes it to the intellectual property office and works on an transfer agreement with the university and often sets up a biotech startup. The discovery is then sold to the pharmas who buy the biotech. Sometimes the step of making a biotech is skipped and the pharma directly buys the intellectual property rights, sending money back to the university. Either way, the university and the head of the lab get money for the discovery.
 
Displayed 15 of 15 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »