If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy) Spiffy Benicio Del Toro to play the villain in next Star Trek movie. We can't stop here, Spock, this is bat country   (collider.com) divider line 60
More: Spiffy, Benicio Del Toro, Star Trek 2, Star Trek, Anton Yelchin, Zachary Quinto, John Cho, Karl Urban, Roberto Orci  
•       •       •

3217 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 05 Nov 2011 at 7:58 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



60 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-05 07:54:15 AM
Do they pay you to screw that tribble?
 
2011-11-05 08:00:49 AM
Neat. Now just tone down the lens flare and we should be set.
 
2011-11-05 08:18:46 AM
Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?
 
2011-11-05 08:39:21 AM
strangeguitar: Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?

Captain Kirk's going to get flipped for real.
 
2011-11-05 08:40:05 AM
Khan Guevara?
 
2011-11-05 08:47:55 AM
Fascinating....
 
2011-11-05 09:22:18 AM
strangeguitar: Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?

And we're done here. Someone get the lights?
 
2011-11-05 09:24:58 AM
Will he drive a 200 hundred year old muscle car? There has to be a clichéd muscle car for it to be considered authentic New Trek
 
2011-11-05 09:31:41 AM
Jorge Mudd?
 
2011-11-05 09:40:44 AM
Jesus Mudd?
 
2011-11-05 09:50:57 AM
Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?
 
2011-11-05 09:55:57 AM
strangeguitar: Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?

I lol'd.
 
2011-11-05 10:07:49 AM
Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?


To be fair, Kahn WAS supposed to be Indian. They just cast Montalban in the role because most Americans in the 60s wouldn't know the difference.
 
2011-11-05 10:10:43 AM
If it's going to be Khan, they should have gone with the obvious choice ... Shah Rukh!
 
2011-11-05 10:16:56 AM
towatchoverme: Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?

To be fair, Kahn WAS supposed to be Indian. They just cast Montalban in the role because most Americans in the 60s wouldn't know the difference.


I saw an episode of Hawaii 5-0 a few weeks ago where Montalban played a Japanese man, slanty eyed make-up and all
 
2011-11-05 10:22:40 AM
If it is Khan, I hope they have him and Spock throw-down, they both have super-human strength so it could be awesome.

also I hated the tribbles and I hated Mudd, so if either one of them are in this movie I'll probably get so angry I'll try to shove a remote control in my butt.
 
2011-11-05 10:24:31 AM
Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?


Your brain is apparently very limited in its capabilities.

Just because they've cast a Hispanic actor (del Toro is Puerto Rican) doesn't mean he has to play a character played by another Hispanic actor.
 
2011-11-05 10:30:00 AM
Star Trek II Wrath of Len's Flare
 
2011-11-05 10:47:50 AM
beelzebubba76: If it's going to be Khan, they should have gone with the obvious choice ... Shah Rukh!

Actually, wouldn't that be Kal Penn? Since Margaret Cho or whoever is already part of the cast, it'd be Harold and Kumar....in space! shiat, it has to be better than the last three movies.

As for Khan, that wouldn't work within the confines of one film without a lot of changes. The story arc takes place over 15 years. And one of the central themes is Kirk facing middle age. The guy who plays Kirk now is what, 16? And they're not going to kill Spock again. Plus they'd have to shoehorn WWIII taking place in the 1990s.
 
2011-11-05 10:53:23 AM
Mugato: beelzebubba76: If it's going to be Khan, they should have gone with the obvious choice ... Shah Rukh!

Actually, wouldn't that be Kal Penn? Since Margaret Cho or whoever is already part of the cast, it'd be Harold and Kumar....in space! shiat, it has to be better than the last three movies.

As for Khan, that wouldn't work within the confines of one film without a lot of changes. The story arc takes place over 15 years. And one of the central themes is Kirk facing middle age. The guy who plays Kirk now is what, 16? And they're not going to kill Spock again. Plus they'd have to shoehorn WWIII taking place in the 1990s.


WWIII is an easy 15 minute beginning of the movie showing some really cool shoot 'em up boom boom and then toward the end of the world khan and what not shoot themselves into space as that history wasn't changed by Nero. So the movie could very well be Kirk and Khan meeting each other, only obviously it could be very different this time. Hell you could have another race finding khan and waking him up and getting taken over by him, at least the ship that got him. although why he'd return to earth to try and take over and thinking he had a shot is beyond me.
 
2011-11-05 10:58:36 AM
Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?


www.americancinemathequecalendar.com

Abraaaaaaaaaaaams!!!
 
2011-11-05 11:01:04 AM
The fact that they are still making ST movies is bad enough, but to try shoehorning a dynamic actor like this into what is going to be an undoubtedly flatly-written character (face it, all ST characters are flatly-written) is just wrong. It will come off as a comical farce, and we will all make fun of it relentlessly.
 
2011-11-05 11:01:08 AM
Dwight_Yeast: Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?

Your brain is apparently very limited in its capabilities.

Just because they've cast a Hispanic actor (del Toro is Puerto Rican) doesn't mean he has to play a character played by another Hispanic actor.


You haven't paid much attention to Hollywood lately, have you?

I can actually think of lots of novel ways that Del Toro could be used as a Star Trek villain. I just don't have much faith in the people who make movies these days to not do the safe, obvious, profitable thing.
 
2011-11-05 11:04:06 AM
You Are All Sheep: WWIII is an easy 15 minute beginning of the movie showing some really cool shoot 'em up boom boom and then toward the end of the world khan and what not shoot themselves into space as that history wasn't changed by Nero

Yeah, I guess. I always found it strange that Roddenberry created this utopian future that was supposed to be so optimistic, yet he still wrote in a Wold War III within our lifetimes.

Would it kill them to create an original villain? It's bad enough that with a universe that is arguably the largest ever created in modern literature that they had to go back to the Kirk and Spock well but they have to mine the villains as well? They know they're not going to top Wrath of Khan so why try? These guys aren't going to chew the scenery the way Monalban and Shatner did.
 
2011-11-05 11:04:35 AM
Mugato: beelzebubba76: If it's going to be Khan, they should have gone with the obvious choice ... Shah Rukh!

Actually, wouldn't that be Kal Penn? Since Margaret Cho or whoever is already part of the cast, it'd be Harold and Kumar....in space! shiat, it has to be better than the last three movies.

As for Khan, that wouldn't work within the confines of one film without a lot of changes. The story arc takes place over 15 years. And one of the central themes is Kirk facing middle age. The guy who plays Kirk now is what, 16? And they're not going to kill Spock again. Plus they'd have to shoehorn WWIII taking place in the 1990s.


Well, if they were silly enough to actually do Khan, it would be the young Kirk and Khan from the TV episode, not the one from the movies. Spock dies in the move.

With a name like yours, I would expect you to know this. Shame on you.
 
2011-11-05 11:15:08 AM
Tor_Eckman: Well, if they were silly enough to actually do Khan, it would be the young Kirk and Khan from the TV episode, not the one from the movies. Spock dies in the move.

With a name like yours, I would expect you to know this. Shame on you.


Yes, Space Seed. Great television episode, not great major motion picture material.

Well, actually they could go the Die Hard route. Khan takes over the Enterprise and Kirk climbs into a Jeffrie's tube and he's the only chance anyone's got.

/33 decks of adventure!
 
2011-11-05 11:16:51 AM
Mugato: Tor_Eckman: Well, if they were silly enough to actually do Khan, it would be the young Kirk and Khan from the TV episode, not the one from the movies. Spock dies in the move.

With a name like yours, I would expect you to know this. Shame on you.

Yes, Space Seed. Great television episode, not great major motion picture material.

Well, actually they could go the Die Hard route. Khan takes over the Enterprise and Kirk climbs into a Jeffrie's tube and he's the only chance anyone's got.

/33 decks of adventure!


Yippie ki yay, Mr. Fal-Khan!
 
2011-11-05 11:46:36 AM
ThisSideofSteinway: strangeguitar: Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?

Captain Kirk's going to get flipped for real.


It's odd that I understand Del Toro's Spanish in "Traffic" easier than I can understand his English in "Usual Suspects."
 
2011-11-05 12:01:14 PM
It's a reboot universe, Vulcan is gone, who cares. It's like giving a shiat that they discontinued the 1991-94 Mercury Capri.
 
2011-11-05 12:02:37 PM
"The villain"? People know there doesn't have to be anyone playing a villain in a Star Trek story, right? Star Trek IV didn't have one.
 
2011-11-05 12:03:28 PM
The only way ST can be saved is by killing it and not touching it for a generation or two.
 
2011-11-05 12:22:48 PM
I do hope it's not Khan, hard to top Montalban's shenanigans.

Mugato: beelzebubba76: If it's going to be Khan, they should have gone with the obvious choice ... Shah Rukh!

Actually, wouldn't that be Kal Penn? Since Margaret Cho or whoever is already part of the cast, it'd be Harold and Kumar....in space! shiat, it has to be better than the last three movies.

As for Khan, that wouldn't work within the confines of one film without a lot of changes. The story arc takes place over 15 years. And one of the central themes is Kirk facing middle age. The guy who plays Kirk now is what, 16? And they're not going to kill Spock again. Plus they'd have to shoehorn WWIII taking place in the 1990s.
 
2011-11-05 12:28:39 PM
I think he will be a good Harry Mudd.
 
2011-11-05 12:30:20 PM
Tor_Eckman: Well, if they were silly enough to actually do Khan, it would be the young Kirk and Khan from the TV episode, not the one from the movies.

Then why redo Khan if not for Montalban's reprisal? The Shatner versus Montalban was why Wrath of Khan was so awesome.

Rebooting Khan without the Moby Dick ham is like Christmas without the relentless marketing & commercialization! The whole concept of this is stupid, and I liked the first reboot movie.

/¿Quien es mas macho? ¿Del Toro o Montalbán?
 
2011-11-05 12:33:11 PM
I somehow doubt it'll be Khan. Just because he's Hispanic that's what people automatically assume? Really?
 
2011-11-05 12:42:02 PM
Frankie Farkin' Four Fingers is going into space?
 
2011-11-05 12:47:41 PM
can we STOP revisting TOS?
for the love of god.

I watched the series live when it was first run. I am rewatching it, yet again as we speak. but FFS, the movies do not need to revisit every nerd's wet dream.

sigh

/should add more ewoks!!
 
2011-11-05 12:48:21 PM
stoli n coke: ThisSideofSteinway: strangeguitar: Hand me the farking Enterprise, you cocksucker, what the fark?

Captain Kirk's going to get flipped for real.

It's odd that I understand Del Toro's Spanish in "Traffic" easier than I can understand his English in "Usual Suspects."


LOL
 
2011-11-05 12:51:05 PM
towatchoverme: Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?

To be fair, Kahn WAS supposed to be Indian. They just cast Montalban in the role because most Americans in the 60s wouldn't know the difference.


Well Kahn was also a product of eugenics. so I'm not sure what 'Indian' would mean in that context.
 
2011-11-05 01:08:11 PM
Khan? O_O
 
2011-11-05 01:15:37 PM
MrLint: towatchoverme: Tor_Eckman: Well known Spanish actor + Star Trek = ?

Didn't they promise not to redo Khan?

To be fair, Kahn WAS supposed to be Indian. They just cast Montalban in the role because most Americans in the 60s wouldn't know the difference.

Well Kahn was also a product of eugenics. so I'm not sure what 'Indian' would mean in that context.


plus indians are caucasians. some are dark, some are light, some are inbetween.
 
2011-11-05 01:23:21 PM
They should start the first two minutes of the second film with the Enterprise finding and destroying the SS Botany Bay on the orders of the original Spock. I mean, seriously, Spock would be negligent to not inform Star Fleet that Khan is out there.
 
2011-11-05 01:24:56 PM

Khan? Benicio Del Toro isn't Laotian.


johnozed.com


Are ya Mister Del Toro?
 
2011-11-05 01:44:50 PM
Larry Mahnken: They should start the first two minutes of the second film with the Enterprise finding and destroying the SS Botany Bay on the orders of the original Spock. I mean, seriously, Spock would be negligent to not inform Star Fleet that Khan is out there.

Well if the events in Wrath of Khan didn't take place, Spock wouldn't have died. If Spock didn't die, they wouldn't have been on Vulcan when Earth got attacked by the whale probe thing. They could have been stuck on Earth and Earth could have been destroyed. Of course I suppose he could have warned them about the whale probe thing too. Therein lies the problem with time travel stories. There's a shiatload of things Spock could have warned everyone about. He could have told Kirk not to sire that pussy son of his for one thing, that would have solved a lot of problems.
 
2011-11-05 01:45:22 PM
Larry Mahnken: They should start the first two minutes of the second film with the Enterprise finding and destroying the SS Botany Bay on the orders of the original Spock. I mean, seriously, Spock would be negligent to not inform Star Fleet that Khan is out there.

or dropping them on a planet that spock knows is stable. and sterilizing them from orbit.
 
2011-11-05 01:46:28 PM
He's gonna be a pretty neat looking Kardashian.
 
2011-11-05 01:53:24 PM
"Spock fingered my asshole tonight!"

"Is it Friday night already?"
 
2011-11-05 01:54:38 PM
Mugato: There's a shiatload of things Spock could have warned everyone about.

Who's to say he doesn't? He doesn't have to worry about changing history anymore, and I'm sure he'd give Starfleet the heads-up on things like V-Ger. Why would he want to watch his younger self have the same adventures anyway?
 
2011-11-05 02:43:38 PM
KnowEyeInnTeem: Jorge Mudd?

Oh, is that the one about the hooker with the dysentery?
 
2011-11-05 02:54:21 PM
Confabulat: Mugato: There's a shiatload of things Spock could have warned everyone about.

Who's to say he doesn't? He doesn't have to worry about changing history anymore, and I'm sure he'd give Starfleet the heads-up on things like V-Ger. Why would he want to watch his younger self have the same adventures anyway?


Especially the V-Ger one. . ..
 
Displayed 50 of 60 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »