If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Motherboard.tv) Interesting Size doesn't matter, Pluto is still a planet   (motherboard.tv) divider line 87
More: Interesting, dwarf planets, planets, Little Planet, Kuiper Belt, IAU, Planetary Science, trans-Neptunian object, New Horizons  
•       •       •

5715 clicks; posted to Geek » on 04 Nov 2011 at 2:27 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



87 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-04 12:14:18 PM
I think size matters when comparing it to Uranus.
 
2011-11-04 12:20:20 PM
images3.makefive.com
 
2011-11-04 01:00:03 PM
Frankly, I'm more bothered by distinguishing terrestrials by whether or not the primary is undergoing significant fusion or not.
 
2011-11-04 01:01:19 PM
When we are children and we learn to recite the planets, we do not put the conditional "dwarf" in front of it. By putting the conditional in front of Pluto its status is diminished. That's what the big deal is, article writer. It's not Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and the dwarf planets Pluto, Ceres, Haumea, Eris and Makemake. They are two necessarily separate categories.

Anyway, I don't bother arguing, I simply count Pluto as a planet, with the same arbitrariness that the IAU used to demote it. Mine is that it had been a full-fledged planet since its discovery and so gets that consideration. What are they going to do, have me arrested for arbitrary astronomical heresy?
 
2011-11-04 01:04:34 PM
Pluto will always be a planet to me, and if any little whippersnapper tells me there are only 8 planets I will kick them sqa in the nuts.
 
2011-11-04 01:06:45 PM
There are not 9 planets.

There are 8.

Or there are hundreds.

Take your pick.
 
2011-11-04 01:26:28 PM
Planets aren't defined by size. They are defined by how dominant their gravitational influence is within their orbit. The planets all dominate their orbit. The dwarf planets (including Pluto) do not.

But if you want a definition of "if it's round and goes around the sun" to define planethood, then have fun memorizing the dozens and dozens of random things that fit that. Ceres (Large round object between Mars and Jupiter that got demoted a hundred years before Pluto did any nobody complained), Pallas, Hygiea, Interamnia, Vesta, Eris, Haumea, Makemake, Orcus, Ixion, Varuna, Quaoar, Sedna, and a few dozen that haven't been given a real name yet.
 
2011-11-04 01:31:41 PM
Walker: Pluto will always be a planet to me, and if any little whippersnapper tells me there are only 8 planets I will kick them sqa in the nuts.

Indeed.

Also, you should find the dumbass teacher that taught the kid there were only 8 planets, and beat him with a sock full of nickels.

IT'S STILL A PLANET TO ME, DAMMIT!
 
2011-11-04 01:52:21 PM
 
vpb [TotalFark]
2011-11-04 02:09:35 PM
ThatGuyGreg: There are not 9 planets.

There are 8.

Or there are hundreds.

Take your pick.


Or we could pick "There are 9 planets and if you don't like it STFU and get off my lawn!".
 
2011-11-04 02:23:49 PM
VE in a Pluto thread? :/
 
2011-11-04 02:34:59 PM
i229.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-04 02:35:19 PM
For you social science/psychology people out there, is this topic a good example of comparing those who are afraid of change vs those who are not?

Kome, this might be in your field.

/Voting enabled? Why?
 
2011-11-04 02:36:39 PM
Adolf Oliver Nipples When we are children and we learn to recite the planets, we do not put the conditional "dwarf" in front of it.

It's not a dwarf planet. It's a little person planet.
 
2011-11-04 02:57:07 PM
ThatGuyGreg: There are not 9 planets.

There are 8.

Or there are hundreds.

Take your pick.


This
 
2011-11-04 03:01:00 PM
It is NOT a planet. I know because the cute asian teacher in the Target commercial used scissors to snip Pluto out of the diorama. Link (new window)


/sooo much glitter!
 
2011-11-04 03:02:40 PM
Adolf Oliver Nipples: Anyway, I don't bother arguing, I simply count Pluto as a planet, with the same arbitrariness that the IAU used to demote it. Mine is that it had been a full-fledged planet since its discovery and so gets that consideration. What are they going to do, have me arrested for arbitrary astronomical heresy?

No, they'll just snicker at you for holding to obsolete definitions. It'd be the same as if you continued using Linneaus' classifications of humans as four separate species, based on skin color and continent.
 
2011-11-04 03:11:06 PM
Earguy: It is NOT a planet. I know because the cute asian teacher in the Target commercial used scissors to snip Pluto out of the diorama. Link (new window)


/sooo much glitter!


She's hot, my wife has a crush on her.
 
2011-11-04 03:12:37 PM
The worst thing about the article:

This argument only brings to mind images of Maud Flanders screaming "Won't somebody please think of the children?!"

It's Lovejoy's catchphase :(
 
2011-11-04 03:14:47 PM
The definition of Planet was always somewhat arbitrary. I think its just astro-politics whether Pluto is seen as a planet or not.

It became not-a-planet when the wrong person discovered Eris (because if it was the head if some big organization, you can bet your arse we'd have 10 planets now).
I suspect when the Pluto express arrives and starts raising media attention, it and a few others will probably become planets once again.

/Either that or astronomers spend the following year being buried in hate mail from every grade school in the world.
/They should have gone with "planets" and "Classical planets" for their distinction.
 
2011-11-04 03:15:14 PM
Stompn_Tom: ThatGuyGreg: There are not 9 planets.

There are 8.

Or there are hundreds.

Take your pick.

This


Double this.
 
2011-11-04 03:22:04 PM
There are 9+
 
2011-11-04 03:29:32 PM
Pluto is still a planet!!!

And earth, wind, fire, and water are still elements, damn it!
 
2011-11-04 03:40:18 PM
You'll get over it.
- The IAU
 
2011-11-04 03:42:47 PM
There are either 8 planets or 8,000.
 
2011-11-04 03:50:29 PM
Adolf Oliver Nipples: When we are children and we learn to recite the planets, we do not put the conditional "dwarf" in front of it. By putting the conditional in front of Pluto its status is diminished. That's what the big deal is, article writer. It's not Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and the dwarf planets Pluto, Ceres, Haumea, Eris and Makemake. They are two necessarily separate categories.

Anyway, I don't bother arguing, I simply count Pluto as a planet, with the same arbitrariness that the IAU used to demote it. Mine is that it had been a full-fledged planet since its discovery and so gets that consideration. What are they going to do, have me arrested for arbitrary astronomical heresy?


The astronomical inquisition

firebreathingchristian.files.wordpress.com
 
2011-11-04 03:52:05 PM
There's a fair chance that there's planets, even ginormous ones like Jupiter even farther out there than Pluto. The physicists have observed some gravitational anomalies that suggest there's other sizable stuff out there in our solar system. The issue is that it's too dark.

Why yes, I do watch the Discovery Channel too much.
 
2011-11-04 03:53:47 PM
Planet-hood Now for

Quaoar

Sedna

2003 EL61

2005 FY9

2002 UB313
 
2011-11-04 03:58:09 PM
 
2011-11-04 03:59:33 PM
"You heard about Pluto? That's messed up, right?" - Guy Buttersnaps
 
2011-11-04 04:04:46 PM
planetretcon.com

The point is, scientific definitions of planets change. Deal with it. Other things change, too. Others have pointed out that Water is no longer an Element. Are you screaming and crying over that? No. You're screaming and crying over Pluto, the only "planet" you've never actually seen a decent picture of because it's so tiny and so far away.
 
2011-11-04 04:09:26 PM
Earguy: It is NOT a planet. I know because the cute asian teacher in the Target commercial used scissors to snip Pluto out of the diorama. Link (new window)


/sooo much glitter!


My husband giggles uncontrollably when that commercial comes on...
 
2011-11-04 04:11:10 PM
 
2011-11-04 04:15:56 PM
hasty ambush: Surly U. Jest: How about we visit Pluto.

Orbiter is a free and realistic space flight simulation program for the Windows PC. (new window)

[orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk image 640x480]

[orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk image 640x480]

[orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk image 640x480]


Cool! That's a bookmark for when I get home.
 
2011-11-04 04:32:36 PM
monkeydrunky.com
 
2011-11-04 04:40:02 PM
I really never got the uproar.

I was instead rather fascinated that we have dozens and dozens of objects orbiting the sun, and that primary school science education sucks for never let us know about it, forcing that "9 planets" nonsense down our throats. Pluto is as TFA says still there, and is far less interesting that all the crap going on around the solar system, which is actually a lot, like comets from the Ort cloud, or even the rumored black objects nemesis/tyche.

Seriously everyone should feel cheated by the education system.
 
2011-11-04 04:55:52 PM
Yes it is. Pluto is a dwarf planet.
 
2011-11-04 05:06:00 PM
The world 'planet' doesn't really mean anything anyway. The supposed definition was created after the fact to try to tidy up categorisation, a meaningless aim.
 
2011-11-04 05:22:12 PM
Is the descriptor 'dwarf' throwing people off?

I see what you did there.

Mother very thoughtfully made a jam sandwich using no peanuts, mayonnaise, glue.

Hail Eris!
 
2011-11-04 05:22:43 PM
If Pluto is just another Kupier Belt object and nothing special, why was it discovered 60 years before any of the others?
 
2011-11-04 05:32:58 PM
No. No it isn't.
 
2011-11-04 05:36:26 PM
ArkPanda: If Pluto is just another Kupier Belt object and nothing special, why was it discovered 60 years before any of the others?

because they stumbled upon it - an object that size at that distance is soooooo small and takes up a minuscule fraction of the sky
 
2011-11-04 06:00:37 PM
Pluto is not a planet. It is quite obviously, because of size, location, and eccentricity and tilt of orbit, a comet.
 
2011-11-04 06:25:06 PM
Yotto: [planetretcon.com image 640x290]

The point is, scientific definitions of planets change. Deal with it. Other things change, too. Others have pointed out that Water is no longer an Element. Are you screaming and crying over that? No. You're screaming and crying over Pluto, the only "planet" you've never actually seen a decent picture of because it's so tiny and so far away.




Ceres got promoted from asteroid to dwarf planet, so life's pretty good for Ceres.
 
2011-11-04 07:04:26 PM
Uakronkid: Planets aren't defined by size. They are defined by how dominant their gravitational influence is within their orbit. The planets all dominate their orbit. The dwarf planets (including Pluto) do not.

Pluto is in a resonance orbit with Neptune. Pluto "crosses" Neptune's orbit (sort of). Neptune does not gravitationally dominate it's orbit. Neptune is not a planet. There are now seven planets.

If Mercury were moved out to Pluto's orbit, would it fail to gravitationally dominate that orbit? Maybe yes? So, Mercury isn't a planet then? There are now six planets.

Not really (faulty logic, science and all), but the whole thing seems kind of arbitrary just to stack against Pluto being a planet than something more concrete.

I'm not afraid of counting more than eight, nine or whatever the number ends up being like the IAU seems to be. So, let there be more planets.
 
2011-11-04 07:21:14 PM
Why are people so defensive of it's planet status? I mean seriously, as planets go it'd be a shiat one. If Jupiter was demoted that'd be cause for everyone to say "HEY!!!" but Pluto? It was the worst planet I'd ever seen. What is the appeal? Is it because it's seen as some kind of underdog? Or is it simply because it has a name like a cartoon dog? Either way I'm baffled by the apparent strength of feeling it raises, with strange people using quite forceful language. I know it's tongue in cheek, but it's still based upon an underlying truth.

At least I hope it's tongue in cheek, I hadn't thought about it, I just assumed it was.
 
2011-11-04 07:48:33 PM
While we're at it, can we do something about this supposed fifth ocean?
 
2011-11-04 07:49:54 PM
Slaxl: Why are people so defensive of it's planet status? I mean seriously, as planets go it'd be a shiat one. If Jupiter was demoted that'd be cause for everyone to say "HEY!!!" but Pluto? It was the worst planet I'd ever seen. What is the appeal? Is it because it's seen as some kind of underdog? Or is it simply because it has a name like a cartoon dog? Either way I'm baffled by the apparent strength of feeling it raises, with strange people using quite forceful language. I know it's tongue in cheek, but it's still based upon an underlying truth.

At least I hope it's tongue in cheek, I hadn't thought about it, I just assumed it was.


Pluto, before being a dogs dog was the God of the underworld, to have the representative of such an important deity so completely dis'd, now twice, with the whole dwarf thing is not cool...
Verger on the other hand out in the abyss still has Pluto as a planet carved into it's ID panel...
So at least we have that.
When the aliens find it and can't figure out where it came from because we had the whole system so completely wrong and probably still do, why the hell would any of them even want to make first contact?
 
2011-11-04 07:58:06 PM
The planets are like vowels:
Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and sometimes Pluto.

I don't see what the big deal is.
 
2011-11-04 08:15:38 PM
itsrealtomedamnit.jpg
 
Displayed 50 of 87 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »