If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Fox News) Followup It turns out that no amount of airbrushing or photoshopping could make Lindsay Lohan presentable enough for Playboy   (foxnews.com) divider line 115
More: Followup  
•       •       •

17919 clicks; posted to Entertainment » on 04 Nov 2011 at 11:04 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



115 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-04 10:50:44 AM
if only they could time travel to 2004 and get some nude pictures of her then :(
 
2011-11-04 10:55:53 AM
kbronsito: if only they could time travel to 2004 and get some nude pictures of her then :(

i235.photobucket.com
 
2011-11-04 11:06:09 AM
Given the recent pictures I've seen of her, I can't say I'm surprised. She looks like a coke-whore.

Probably because she is a coke-whore.
 
2011-11-04 11:06:40 AM
tits. vagina. in focus. beyond that, I don't think anyone's too picky.

I swear Playboy is run by gay men now.
 
2011-11-04 11:07:50 AM
Their celebrity shoots are so goddamn Photoshopped, that I have trouble believing the quality of the photography session even matters. Now the candid pics where she lost her top in the surf? Those were hot.
 
2011-11-04 11:08:07 AM
I thought we would have to wait at least another year to find out if her anus was remarkable or not.
 
2011-11-04 11:09:08 AM
I still find her kind of attractive, so looking forward to this.
 
2011-11-04 11:10:02 AM
Rather see her in Hustler where she belongs.
 
2011-11-04 11:10:10 AM
You take a greasy whore and a rollin' dance floor
You know you're jailhouse-bound
 
2011-11-04 11:10:35 AM
........ she already did nude photos dressed as Marylin Monroe.
 
2011-11-04 11:11:34 AM
www3.images.coolspotters.com

don't worry, Larry will take her in.
 
2011-11-04 11:11:51 AM
farkeruk: tits. vagina. in focus. beyond that, I don't think anyone's too picky.

I swear Playboy is run by gay men now.


There's a difference between wanting to buy a magazine to see a beautiful (if airbrushed/photoshopped) woman, and buying a magazine to see what the trainwreck looks like now. If it were Hustler, I would've been shocked if they didn't add a black eye or c-section scar. Makes sense that Playboy at least wants her to come out somewhat presentable.
 
2011-11-04 11:12:08 AM
3.bp.blogspot.comwww.superphotospace.comyeeeah.com
 
2011-11-04 11:12:21 AM
Eh...still better then all the fatty's that rule fark...

www.radaronline.com

But those teeth and face...Christ.
 
2011-11-04 11:14:02 AM
Than not Then....

Damn you friday!
 
2011-11-04 11:15:57 AM
just airbrush those open sores
 
2011-11-04 11:18:32 AM
What_Would_Jimi_Do: You take a greasy whore and a rollin' dance floor
You know you're jailhouse-bound


Humble Pie FTW!

/Thank you good sir.
//Lawn, off it, youngsters...
 
2011-11-04 11:19:27 AM
Get the Iranian photoshop team to do the work. take stock pictures and just put her face on the model, done.
 
2011-11-04 11:19:29 AM
I still don't understand why she hasn't lost the blonde hair.

Who told her that looks good with her skin complexion?
 
2011-11-04 11:20:22 AM
Amurica...Fark Ya!: Than not Then....

Damn you friday!


plural/possessive.

aren't you a teacher?
 
2011-11-04 11:21:49 AM
There was a time when I spent more than my fair share of time with a variety of Playboy Playmates (in a work capacity) and I must say that while most of them were quite attractive women I did run across one or two that really made me appreciate the Photoshop arts. These were women that you wouldn't look twice at in normal situations and I could not understand who had looked at them and decided that they were worthy of the magazine.
 
2011-11-04 11:22:25 AM
Cheron: Get the Iranian photoshop team to do the work. take stock pictures and just put her face on the model, done.

...with 60 tits!
 
2011-11-04 11:22:50 AM
farkeruk: tits. vagina. in focus. beyond that, I don't think anyone's too picky.

I swear Playboy is run by gay men now.


Composition's always been a big deal over at Playboy; it's part of their whole marketing strategy of targeting "classy", "cosmopolitan" types. I think you're confusing them with Hustler, which has always had far more "rough and ready" shoots.
 
2011-11-04 11:23:54 AM
What_Would_Jimi_Do: You take a greasy whore and a rollin' dance floor
You know you're jailhouse-bound


Thank you for this....

/rip Steve Marriott
 
2011-11-04 11:25:46 AM
Maybe Playboy finally figured out that they overpaid for her photo shoot and are looking to double down on their investment. No doubt they still own the rights to the original set and they will own the rights to the re-shoot.

Release one, wait for a couple of years, when her obit is making headlines, and release the original photo shoot. Voila, 2 photo shoots for the million that they paid for only one. Granted, they still overpaid.
 
2011-11-04 11:26:40 AM
This isn't unusual - plenty of models are called back for second shoots whether it's for Playboy magazine or L. L. Bean's Witner Catalog - it happens all the time - I'm not white knighting here but I really doubt it has to do with the fact that she looks like she's been living on a diet of meth, coke and cigarettes.
 
2011-11-04 11:28:47 AM
/obvious
 
2011-11-04 11:29:43 AM
kbronsito: if only they could time travel to 2004 1998 and get some nude pictures of her then :(


DUDE. Come on man. That's sick.
 
2011-11-04 11:33:44 AM
Liams_Soul: Granted, they still overpaid.

I doubt it. I'm sure they'll make their million back in increased sales.
 
2011-11-04 11:35:24 AM
Bullshiat.
She probably talked them into delaying the shoot to stay out of the clinker.
 
2011-11-04 11:35:55 AM
or some executive didn't make it into the room with the one way mirror in time so he just calls her back. in for another round
 
2011-11-04 11:36:01 AM
farkeruk: tits. vagina. in focus. beyond that, I don't think anyone's too picky.

I swear Playboy is run by gay men now.


Yeah, I'd be picky. I can GIS crack whores for free - if I were to buy an $8 magazine, the trim inside better be spectacular.
 
2011-11-04 11:38:01 AM
tchau: I still find her kind of attractive, so looking forward to this.

I'm so sorry for you.
 
2011-11-04 11:39:34 AM
Lollipop165: I still don't understand why she hasn't lost the blonde hair.

Who told her that looks good with her skin complexion?


Admittedly, I don't work in the entertainment industry, but give the rather drastic body changes of many female celebs (and the sameness of celebs vis a vis body shape and coloring), there seems to be a very limited number of look which folks in that industry consider acceptable. Take Christina Ricci, for instance, who went from wonderfully voluptuous to basically a waif over-night mostly due -as she herself said at the time- to social pressure from friends and industry people. I'd imagine a similar thing has happened with Lohan, but with certain differences. In regards to her hair, there may have been natural processes reinforcing any social pressure she might have faced; for many redheads, the color naturally washes out as you get older, and does so very quickly. Past 25, the lighter red shades sometimes start fading towards blonde or light brown naturally, and it isn't uncommon even for redheads who aren't in an occupation where appearance is everything like Ms. Lohan to just say "fark it" and start bleaching. Frankly, I think she'd have been better off dyeing her hair a darker red color (closer to, say, Christina Hendricks hue) because blonde just makes her a walking white out and any darker than red tends to be too strong a contrast with her complexion, but like I said early, entertainment and modelling industry-types seem to have a limited tolerance for unique looks, so she likely was encouraged to go blonde instead of retaining her red hair.
 
2011-11-04 11:41:09 AM
I dunno, those pictures from her jail-time hearing made her look pretty zombified. I guess PShop can add flesh tones back in, but ya gotta have something to work with.
 
2011-11-04 11:42:45 AM
dothemath: Bullshiat.
She probably talked them into delaying the shoot to stay out of the clinker.


What I thought too. Although it hardly matters because she's going to do about 10 minutes in jail.
 
2011-11-04 11:45:45 AM
I'm guessing Playboy realized how many people were talking about the first shoot and decided they wanted more pictures for a follow-up. Or maybe they got plenty of decent shots, but no real good cover. You never know. Playboy's editors have a history of being pretty harsh when it comes to picture selection.
 
2011-11-04 11:51:35 AM
Heron: Composition's always been a big deal over at Playboy; it's part of their whole marketing strategy of targeting "classy", "cosmopolitan" types. I think you're confusing them with Hustler, which has always had far more "rough and ready" shoots.

Oh, I don't have a problem with that for their normal models.

But you don't look at Lohan because she's hot, because she isn't. She's not dog ugly, but she isn't even as hot as most of the women in the issue. Celebrity nudity is like being a peeping tom, seeing that which you're not supposed to get access to. If Lohan did a 2nd shoot, no-one would be interested.
 
2011-11-04 11:52:37 AM
"and with your wrinkled pussy I cant be your loveeer photographer"


/ sippin on gin and freckle juice
 
2011-11-04 11:56:42 AM
Lollipop165: I still don't understand why she hasn't lost the blonde hair.

Who told her that looks good with her skin complexion?


Paris Hilton ran around on camera calling LiLo a "firecrotch" and she's never fully recovered. Trufax.
 
2011-11-04 11:59:21 AM
birchman: kbronsito: if only they could time travel to 2004 and get some nude pictures of her then :(

[Chris Hansen pic]


Her birth date is July 2, 1986 so she was 18 in 2004. Nothing Chris Hansen about that.
 
2011-11-04 12:01:40 PM
Blasphemous Knave: Paris Hilton ran around on camera calling LiLo a "firecrotch" and she's never fully recovered. Trufax.

I don't know why this is bad. I dated a true firecrotch and it was farking amazing down there.
 
2011-11-04 12:02:22 PM
cbskroq.files.wordpress.com



"Why are they bent on destroying my happiness,Shawn? Why?!"
 
2011-11-04 12:02:45 PM
we get to see the balloon knot!
 
2011-11-04 12:05:08 PM
What's so special here? I've re-shot on pictures of her dozens of times.
 
2011-11-04 12:06:53 PM
lehmac: "and with your wrinkled pussy I cant be your loveeer photographer"


/ sippin on gin and freckle juice


THIS.....

+1 to you good sir!!
 
2011-11-04 12:11:48 PM
farkeruk: Heron: Composition's always been a big deal over at Playboy; it's part of their whole marketing strategy of targeting "classy", "cosmopolitan" types. I think you're confusing them with Hustler, which has always had far more "rough and ready" shoots.

Oh, I don't have a problem with that for their normal models.

But you don't look at Lohan because she's hot, because she isn't. She's not dog ugly, but she isn't even as hot as most of the women in the issue. Celebrity nudity is like being a peeping tom, seeing that which you're not supposed to get access to. If Lohan did a 2nd shoot, no-one would be interested.


fair enough.
 
2011-11-04 12:12:58 PM
If it were something other than playboy, I'd say that they wanted something more hardcore. More likely they screwed up photoshopping out any semblance of a vagina, and need to reshoot. I think if I were tasked with removing vaginas for Playboy, I'd be unable to resist giving all the girls a case of Vagina Dentata.
 
2011-11-04 12:13:37 PM
Reason for the delay: The freckle airbrusher had a stroke.
 
2011-11-04 12:14:05 PM
Yep...here is how it went down (so to speak):

Playboy: Lilo, thanks for the pics and all. Tell ya what...we can keep you out of jail for another week or two if you show us your butthole, touch yourself a little bit, and let us take pics/vid of it.

Lohan: Um, ok.

And the reality of the situation:
Playboy: We're actually just waiting for our software geeks to finish a Photoshop plugin that will handle this level of ick. In fact, that is what they are calling it--the Ick Filter. We had proof of concept already, but we never have truly needed it before now.
 
Displayed 50 of 115 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »