If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(The Daily Caller) Followup Building 7, Truthers 0   (thedc.com) divider line 501
More: Followup, truther, conspiracy theories  
•       •       •

22943 clicks; posted to Main » on 02 Nov 2011 at 7:47 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



501 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-02 05:04:56 PM
Building ✈7, Truthers 0
 
2011-11-02 05:32:52 PM
So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.
 
2011-11-02 05:40:59 PM
Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.


You are a truther?
 
2011-11-02 05:55:02 PM
Evidence does not inspire people to believe in conspiracies, so evidence cannot be used to refute them.

"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into."
~Author Unknown
 
2011-11-02 05:57:05 PM
violentsalvation: You are a truther?

Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

If I were a truther I would be asking things like "Why is this a 'newly released' video?" or "Why not show everything they had on video right after 9-11 so people could see what really happened?" or "Why does the video have stereo sound, they didn't have stereo audio capabilities in video cameras in 2001.." ect. ect., crazy stuff like that.
 
2011-11-02 06:00:28 PM
I can't wait to use the new "favorite" feature in this thread to highlight all the idiot Truthers.
 
2011-11-02 06:01:17 PM
Godscrack: violentsalvation: You are a truther?

Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

If I were a truther I would be asking things like "Why is this a 'newly released' video?" or "Why not show everything they had on video right after 9-11 so people could see what really happened?" or "Why does the video have stereo sound, they didn't have stereo audio capabilities in video cameras in 2001.." ect. ect., crazy stuff like that.


I'm on the fence with you so far. Keep talking so I can make a firm decision on whether you're a Truther or not.
 
2011-11-02 06:05:53 PM
Calling Howling Frog
 
2011-11-02 06:07:36 PM
I'm not a holocaust denier at all. I'm just curious why people keep insisting there was a holocaust. Why do they keep building monuments and shoving it in my face?
 
2011-11-02 06:29:17 PM
It was the farking Boyscouts and their evil fire building tendencies.

I KNOW THE TRUTH!
 
2011-11-02 06:35:49 PM
Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion

Yep. Next question?
 
2011-11-02 06:43:08 PM
This whole controlled demolition debate is a red herring and boring as hell.

The point is that the attack got through on Shrubby's watch, because he paid the issue no mind. It's irrelevant whether he did this intentionally or was simply incompetent/too busy handing money to the 1%ers. Either way, Dubya bears a significant historical responsibility.

That is the point of the sane majority of the people who object to the heroic official narrative of 9/11.
 
2011-11-02 06:44:36 PM
weknowmemes.com
 
2011-11-02 06:52:42 PM
I believe the towers were brought down by fire, but this video is missing something... A building collapsing.
 
2011-11-02 06:57:21 PM
Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.


Structural support, how the fark does it work?
 
2011-11-02 07:09:51 PM
Procedural Texture: This whole controlled demolition debate is a red herring and boring as hell.

The point is that the attack got through on Shrubby's watch, because he paid the issue no mind. It's irrelevant whether he did this intentionally or was simply incompetent/too busy handing money to the 1%ers. Either way, Dubya bears a significant historical responsibility.

That is the point of the sane majority of the people who object to the heroic official narrative of 9/11.


No it was Bill Clinton's fault. See the intrepid gang of upstarts, known as the Bush Administration, was busy making America awesome, protecting us and leading us into economic prosperity. But then they allegedly found that all the W keys in the White House were stolen along with countless other items by the rapscallion Clinton's. So they got distracted hunting all of those items down for a little bit (okay, 9 months, whatever)
 
2011-11-02 07:15:17 PM
You just watch, a stupid truther will also say:
Forget the fire and building itself

In the video @1:50, "Let's go, let's go.."
1.) The building didn't fall yet. How could he possibly know when to leave the scene? Did he know when the building would fall?
2.) Why does the cameraman focus on the reporter running away? That's very directive. Like a documentary.

Most people with a camera would run, even walk fast backwards, but keep the camera going. Or at least running then turning around occasionally to document what's happening with the building. No professional camera man would cut the camera off during something this spectacular.

Silly stuff like that. Stupids.
 
2011-11-02 07:50:18 PM
Whatever.
 
2011-11-02 07:51:03 PM
Oh, sure. Like the Lizard Overlords can't use AfterEffects. Riiiiiiight.
 
2011-11-02 07:51:05 PM
Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.


There's a bit more to it (new window)
 
2011-11-02 07:52:07 PM
Godscrack: You just watch, a stupid truther will also say:
Forget the fire and building itself

In the video @1:50, "Let's go, let's go.."
1.) The building didn't fall yet. How could he possibly know when to leave the scene? Did he know when the building would fall?
2.) Why does the cameraman focus on the reporter running away? That's very directive. Like a documentary.

Most people with a camera would run, even walk fast backwards, but keep the camera going. Or at least running then turning around occasionally to document what's happening with the building. No professional camera man would cut the camera off during something this spectacular.

Silly stuff like that. Stupids.


FTFY. You said stupid twice in a row. Looked like a typo
 
2011-11-02 07:52:25 PM
Indubitably: Whatever.

I r smrt.

u r dmb.
 
2011-11-02 07:52:58 PM
The TRUTH is, the building just COULD NOT stand up to: The Religion....of Peace.
 
2011-11-02 07:53:01 PM
Adolf had Poland. that's all i'm sayin.
 
2011-11-02 07:53:05 PM
Godscrack: Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

For the same reason someone would continue to complain about a steaming pile of crap on a public bus. It continues to annoy.
 
2011-11-02 07:53:35 PM
Silly subby. As if the problem was lack of evidence.
 
2011-11-02 07:54:56 PM
These are the same people who don't think that a direct collision from a plane and subsequent tower could have been enough to take down a tower. What makes you think that they're going to believe some document fire is going to do it?
 
2011-11-02 07:54:56 PM
You don't expect a republican / birther / /truether / tea partier to belive in science or facts do you?
 
2011-11-02 07:55:23 PM
www.markbrake.com

^ undeniable proof that UFO's are real ^
 
2011-11-02 07:55:35 PM
first "tower" should be "fire."
 
2011-11-02 07:57:06 PM
pudding7: I can't wait to use the new "favorite" feature in this thread to highlight all the idiot Truthers.

New? Pretty sure favorites on Fark have been around 3 or 4 years now.
 
2011-11-02 07:57:23 PM
It has been mentioned a few times already, but no amount of evidence will convince a conspiracy theorist he is wrong. It will all just be folded into a larger conspiracy.
 
2011-11-02 07:57:25 PM
Pfffft. They had ten years to put that "footage" together. Pixels. Seen lots of chops. Etc.
 
2011-11-02 07:57:44 PM
I'm just gonna leave this here
imgs.xkcd.com
 
2011-11-02 07:57:59 PM
yogaFLAME: I'm not a holocaust denier at all. I'm just curious why people keep insisting there was a holocaust. Why do they keep building monuments and shoving it in my face?


Didn't you see the video?

A holocaust brought down bldg 7!
 
2011-11-02 07:58:08 PM
i266.photobucket.com
/hot, like controversy
//I just like this gif
 
2011-11-02 07:58:16 PM
D_Evans45: pudding7: I can't wait to use the new "favorite" feature in this thread to highlight all the idiot Truthers.

New? Pretty sure favorites on Fark have been around 3 or 4 years now.


Yea but the cool little star hasn't been there. You used to have to click on their profile and all that crap, now it's all in one page!
 
2011-11-02 07:58:24 PM
www.debunking911.com
WTC7 looks fine in this photo, no way it should have fallen.
 
2011-11-02 07:58:32 PM
Lunchlady: Silly subby. As if the problem was lack of evidence.

Ah, but it is...

It is precisely a lack of the "right" evidence, yo.

You know that. Yer in skool, no?

Serving up the nourishment...

;)
 
2011-11-02 07:59:57 PM
pudding7: Godscrack: violentsalvation: You are a truther?

Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

If I were a truther I would be asking things like "Why is this a 'newly released' video?" or "Why not show everything they had on video right after 9-11 so people could see what really happened?" or "Why does the video have stereo sound, they didn't have stereo audio capabilities in video cameras in 2001.." ect. ect., crazy stuff like that.

I'm on the fence with you so far. Keep talking so I can make a firm decision on whether you're a Truther or not.


And now you know.
 
2011-11-02 08:00:08 PM
Amos Quito: yogaFLAME: I'm not a holocaust denier at all. I'm just curious why people keep insisting there was a holocaust. Why do they keep building monuments and shoving it in my face?


Didn't you see the video?

A holocaust brought down bldg 7!


HoloGRAM like the "planes" that "hit" the other buildings.
 
2011-11-02 08:00:10 PM
GAT_00: Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

Structural support, how the fark does it work?



Quite well, usually.

/Except on 9/11/2001. It was a bad day for support
 
2011-11-02 08:00:31 PM
Indubitably: You know that. Yer in skool, no?

Serving up the nourishment...


You sound truther.
 
2011-11-02 08:01:33 PM
Maybe building 7 had a wooden frame?
 
2011-11-02 08:01:37 PM
"You're hard-wired to remain entrenched, and the Internet makes it worse because your political beliefs are pasted all over Facebook and wherever else you post your opinions. Backing down means going back on all that. It means letting down your team. Every inch of your psychology will fight it."

//Never thought I'd quote a cracked article of all things.
 
2011-11-02 08:02:22 PM
Plane fly into building and fuel goes boom and building fall down. Maybe the religion of War(christianity) could explain differently, but I like building getting demolished, as it creates thousands of jobs for over a decade to rebuild fallen down buildings. I guess G.W. Bush did create a few jobs after all, as he orchestrated flying planes into the twin towers to create jobs.

/Poor ex-CIA man Saddam, he got hung out to dry over the whole thing.
 
2011-11-02 08:02:54 PM
Conspiracies like 9/11, the moon landing, Obama's birth, etc. are all planted by the government to distract us from the real problems they either can't or don't want to solve.

Conspiracy theorists, and the news coverage they generate, are playing directly into the government's diabolical scheme.
 
2011-11-02 08:02:59 PM
Wait, was there a house that fell on 7that Truthers and crushed them?

/can't RTFA from my phone kos pop up gets in the way.
 
2011-11-02 08:03:46 PM
GAT_00: Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

Structural support, how the fark does it work?


I was going to say...it's...kind of how buildings fall. Did people expected it'd tip over at 45 degrees, balancing there for several seconds, then go "ERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROWWWW KA-BOOM" like Gozilla just kicked it in the dick?
 
2011-11-02 08:05:16 PM
Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.


Yeah, I don't get it. I totally expected the lower floor to collapse and the upper floors just hang there in space with no support.
 
Displayed 50 of 501 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »