Building ✈7, Truthers 0

So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

You are a truther?

Evidence does not inspire people to believe in conspiracies, so evidence cannot be used to refute them.

"You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into."
~Author Unknown

violentsalvation: You are a truther?

Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

If I were a truther I would be asking things like "Why is this a 'newly released' video?" or "Why not show everything they had on video right after 9-11 so people could see what really happened?" or "Why does the video have stereo sound, they didn't have stereo audio capabilities in video cameras in 2001.." ect. ect., crazy stuff like that.

I can't wait to use the new "favorite" feature in this thread to highlight all the idiot Truthers.

Godscrack: violentsalvation: You are a truther?

Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

If I were a truther I would be asking things like "Why is this a 'newly released' video?" or "Why not show everything they had on video right after 9-11 so people could see what really happened?" or "Why does the video have stereo sound, they didn't have stereo audio capabilities in video cameras in 2001.." ect. ect., crazy stuff like that.

I'm on the fence with you so far. Keep talking so I can make a firm decision on whether you're a Truther or not.

I'm not a holocaust denier at all. I'm just curious why people keep insisting there was a holocaust. Why do they keep building monuments and shoving it in my face?

It was the farking Boyscouts and their evil fire building tendencies.

I KNOW THE TRUTH!

Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion

Yep. Next question?

I believe the towers were brought down by fire, but this video is missing something... A building collapsing.

Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

Structural support, how the fark does it work?

Procedural Texture: This whole controlled demolition debate is a red herring and boring as hell.

The point is that the attack got through on Shrubby's watch, because he paid the issue no mind. It's irrelevant whether he did this intentionally or was simply incompetent/too busy handing money to the 1%ers. Either way, Dubya bears a significant historical responsibility.

That is the point of the sane majority of the people who object to the heroic official narrative of 9/11.

No it was Bill Clinton's fault. See the intrepid gang of upstarts, known as the Bush Administration, was busy making America awesome, protecting us and leading us into economic prosperity. But then they allegedly found that all the W keys in the White House were stolen along with countless other items by the rapscallion Clinton's. So they got distracted hunting all of those items down for a little bit (okay, 9 months, whatever)

You just watch, a stupid truther will also say:
Forget the fire and building itself

In the video @1:50, "Let's go, let's go.."
1.) The building didn't fall yet. How could he possibly know when to leave the scene? Did he know when the building would fall?
2.) Why does the cameraman focus on the reporter running away? That's very directive. Like a documentary.

Most people with a camera would run, even walk fast backwards, but keep the camera going. Or at least running then turning around occasionally to document what's happening with the building. No professional camera man would cut the camera off during something this spectacular.

Silly stuff like that. Stupids.

Godscrack: You just watch, a stupid truther will also say:
Forget the fire and building itself

In the video @1:50, "Let's go, let's go.."
1.) The building didn't fall yet. How could he possibly know when to leave the scene? Did he know when the building would fall?
2.) Why does the cameraman focus on the reporter running away? That's very directive. Like a documentary.

Most people with a camera would run, even walk fast backwards, but keep the camera going. Or at least running then turning around occasionally to document what's happening with the building. No professional camera man would cut the camera off during something this spectacular.

Silly stuff like that. Stupids.

FTFY. You said stupid twice in a row. Looked like a typo

Godscrack: Not at all. I just find it odd people are still trying to prove the building collapse was caused by a fire. Ok already. If they are telling the truth, why keep pushing the subject? why are they so insecure about what really happened?

For the same reason someone would continue to complain about a steaming pile of crap on a public bus. It continues to annoy.

D_Evans45: pudding7: I can't wait to use the new "favorite" feature in this thread to highlight all the idiot Truthers.

New? Pretty sure favorites on Fark have been around 3 or 4 years now.

Yea but the cool little star hasn't been there. You used to have to click on their profile and all that crap, now it's all in one page!

"You're hard-wired to remain entrenched, and the Internet makes it worse because your political beliefs are pasted all over Facebook and wherever else you post your opinions. Backing down means going back on all that. It means letting down your team. Every inch of your psychology will fight it."

//Never thought I'd quote a cracked article of all things.

Godscrack: So one 12ft. square radius fire, on a lower floor, weakened the entire building, making it fall in an orderly, accordion-like fashion.

Gotcha.

Yeah, I don't get it. I totally expected the lower floor to collapse and the upper floors just hang there in space with no support.