If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo) Interesting Poll shows Obama's approval rating has risen from "Two ferrets fighting in your pants" to "Oh god, BATS IN MY HAIR" levels   (2012.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 141
More: Interesting  
•       •       •

4168 clicks; posted to Politics » on 02 Nov 2011 at 12:12 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



141 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-11-02 11:51:55 AM
i291.photobucket.com
/obligatory, updated
 
2011-11-02 11:57:24 AM
From the other thread:

ginandbacon 2011-11-02 10:38:46 AM

The numbers we should be looking at though are the Obama vs. ____. None of the GOP candidates fares well:

47 - 42 percent over Romney, compared to a 46 - 42 percent Romney lead October 5;
52 - 36 percent over Perry, up from a 45 - 44 percent tie last month;
50 - 40 percent over Cain, who was not included in a matchup last month;
52 - 37 percent over Gingrich, who was not matched last month.

Also interesting are the gains Obama is making with whites and men:

Over the past month the president's approval among men improved from 60 - 36 percent disapproval to 53 - 43 percent disapproval today; white voters shift from 62 - 34 percent disapproval to 56 - 40 percent disapproval. Women shift from a 51 - 46 percent disapproval last month to a 50 - 46 percent approval today.

The big news is the likely US House voter trends:

Nov 02 Oct 05 Aug 31 Mar 31
2011 2011 2011 2011

Republican 34 39 38 40
Democratic 42 39 38 37

BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Hsp

More 31% 45% 24% 30% 31% 31% 30% 33% 34%
Less 23 14 24 27 21 24 25 17 17
About the same 45 39 52 43 47 43 44 49 49


(From the Quinnipiac poll (new window) cited by TFA.)

ginandbacon 2011-11-02 10:39:42 AM

Sorry for the wacky formatting...
 
2011-11-02 12:19:34 PM
What ginandbacon said.

Funny how he's still ahead of every legitimate (and I use that term loosely) GOP presidential challenger.

/bats in hair > bats in belfry > tebow
 
2011-11-02 12:22:25 PM
Good.
 
2011-11-02 12:22:51 PM
I won't be satisfied until we have a president who is at "Whoa, I just crapped and don't need to wipe" levels.
 
2011-11-02 12:23:00 PM
In a shocking turn of events, Obama will continue to look like a better choice as the GOP candidates continue to talk.

Over the past year, Obama has been compared to the ideal candidate that any conservative would picture as their ideal president. Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Romney are not that candidate. And, as the election gets closer, more and more people will realize that.
 
2011-11-02 12:25:35 PM
bulldg4life: In a shocking turn of events, Obama will continue to look like a better choice as the GOP candidates continue to talk.

Over the past year, Obama has been compared to the ideal candidate that any conservative would picture as their ideal president. Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Romney are not that candidate. And, as the election gets closer, more and more people will realize that.


That's because Gene and Eric Republican aren't real people.
 
2011-11-02 12:26:28 PM
ginandbacon: BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

How?

Are they gearing up to take out RINOs like Boehner, or is that general sentiment?

I could see them being very excited right now imagining their candidate (be it Santorum, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, etc.) winning. I want to see that number after the convention bruises some egos.
 
2011-11-02 12:27:44 PM
meat0918: ginandbacon: BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

How?

Are they gearing up to take out RINOs like Boehner, or is that general sentiment?

I could see them being very excited right now imagining their candidate (be it Santorum, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, etc.) winning. I want to see that number after the convention bruises some egos.


I'm pretty sure that's exactly how it'll turn out; a whole lot of people glad that their idiotic candidate has a chance this year, and then a whole bunch of rage when a different idiotic candidate gets chosen to lose against Obama.
 
2011-11-02 12:28:11 PM
And Obama has been only half-heartedly campaigning. I'm looking forward to when he starts really getting into it, but I suspect I'll have have to wait until the Republicans have actually figured who they want to run against him. It should be entertaining when it happens.
 
2011-11-02 12:28:35 PM
bulldg4life: In a shocking turn of events, Obama will continue to look like a better choice as the GOP candidates continue to talk.

Over the past year, Obama has been compared to the ideal candidate that any conservative would picture as their ideal president. Bachmann, Perry, Cain, and Romney are not that candidate. And, as the election gets closer, more and more people will realize that.


How long is it until we're back to "SARAH PALIN, SAVE US!!1111"

I give it a week.
 
2011-11-02 12:28:41 PM
I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year. I understand there's disaffection, and that things aren't as good as they could be, but I refuse to see how anyone who at the least is a Moderate, could vote for anyone the GOP throws up there. What I'd love to do is walk up to one of these people ask ask them, "Look at where you are now. Do you think you'll be better off in 2016 than you are now, with Herman Cain/Mitt Romney/Rick Perry/Michele Bachmann/Newt Gingrich/Ron Paul/Rick Santorum as President?"
 
2011-11-02 12:29:43 PM
metametameta: And Obama has been only half-heartedly campaigning. I'm looking forward to when he starts really getting into it, but I suspect I'll have have to wait until the Republicans have actually figured who they want to run against him. It should be entertaining when it happens.

Yeah, it doesn't make much sense for him to go full bore against Generic Republican Candidate. We'll have to wait until the GOP convention.
 
2011-11-02 12:33:03 PM
I don't really think I'd be 50/50 on the prospect of BATS IN MY HAIR, submittier
 
2011-11-02 12:33:53 PM
President Obama has:

lowered unemployment
increased unemployment insurance and lowered COBRA payments
lowered taxes
extended healthcare coverage
reformed finance law
led the killing of Osama bin Laden
increased gun rights
successfully assisted natural disasters relief
helped international relations to the U.S.

....and all in the face of the obstructionist Congress is United States history.


As of right now. He has my vote.
 
2011-11-02 12:34:26 PM
sprawl15: meat0918: ginandbacon: BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

How?

Are they gearing up to take out RINOs like Boehner, or is that general sentiment?

I could see them being very excited right now imagining their candidate (be it Santorum, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, etc.) winning. I want to see that number after the convention bruises some egos.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly how it'll turn out; a whole lot of people glad that their idiotic candidate has a chance this year, and then a whole bunch of rage when a different idiotic candidate gets chosen to lose against Obama.


I have a hard time seeing that famed Republican unity holding strong this time around, given how divided their own party is at the moment.
 
2011-11-02 12:35:53 PM
metametameta: And Obama has been only half-heartedly campaigning. I'm looking forward to when he starts really getting into it, but I suspect I'll have have to wait until the Republicans have actually figured who they want to run against him. It should be entertaining when it happens.

If there's one thing Obama's good at, it's campaigning...it will be amusing to watch him run circles around his opponent.
 
2011-11-02 12:38:15 PM
Minus1Kelvin: metametameta: And Obama has been only half-heartedly campaigning. I'm looking forward to when he starts really getting into it, but I suspect I'll have have to wait until the Republicans have actually figured who they want to run against him. It should be entertaining when it happens.

If there's one thing Obama's good at, it's campaigning...it will be amusing to watch him run circles around his opponent.


I'm really, really hoping Romney doesn't win it, because I'd pay in the tens of dollars to watch a debate between, say, Obama and Santorum.
 
2011-11-02 12:39:20 PM
Coco LaFemme: I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year. I understand there's disaffection, and that things aren't as good as they could be, but I refuse to see how anyone who at the least is a Moderate, could vote for anyone the GOP throws up there. What I'd love to do is walk up to one of these people ask ask them, "Look at where you are now. Do you think you'll be better off in 2016 than you are now, with Herman Cain/Mitt Romney/Rick Perry/Michele Bachmann/Newt Gingrich/Ron Paul/Rick Santorum as President?"

The thing is, those people just won't vote. They'll say, "I'll show Obama and the Dems they can't just assume my vote without playing directly towards me and doing everything I want them to do!" Then Republicans take power, the country goes to shiat, and they'll complain about voters being stupid.

I've heard people say, "I won't vote if they don't play to me", when in reality, politicians won't play to you if you don't vote. Why are all the major Republican candidates crazy people? Because crazy right wingers came out in 2010, so they want to grab those votes. No one's vying for the "I voted for Obama in 2008, so I can just stay home in 2010" vote because they're not dependable as voters.

I've made this point before, but just look at the debt ceiling fiasco:

Some 66% of the two groups (GOP/Tea Party) followed news on the issue closely versus only 34% of those who had different views or did not offer a political opinion. Nor were they passive observers: some 20% of Republicans and Tea Partiers contacted an elected official during the standoff while only 5% of the rest did the same. This despite a direct appeal from President Obama to do exactly that.

Show some participation and action in the political process, and you might see results.
 
2011-11-02 12:40:10 PM
Is this the continuatoin of the supposed "plummeting" of approval ratings from 49% to 44% I've been hearing about over the last 3 years.
 
2011-11-02 12:40:54 PM
sprawl15: I'm really, really hoping Romney doesn't win it, because I'd pay in the tens of dollars to watch a debate between, say, Obama and Santorum.

If Romney doesn't win, it's going to be on like Voltron. A glorious, decadent gift to the Democrats. And pure lulzy joy to watch.
 
2011-11-02 12:42:21 PM
InmanRoshi: Is this the continuatoin of the supposed "plummeting" of approval ratings from 49% to 44% I've been hearing about over the last 3 years.

dancingczars.files.wordpress.com
How many times did we see this image back in late 2009?
 
2011-11-02 12:42:33 PM
HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:

lowered unemployment
increased unemployment insurance and lowered COBRA payments
lowered taxes
extended healthcare coverage
reformed finance law
led the killing of Osama bin Laden
increased gun rights
successfully assisted natural disasters relief
helped international relations to the U.S.

....and all in the face of the obstructionist Congress is United States history.


As of right now. He has my vote.


And lest we forget:

t2.gstatic.com
img84.imageshack.us
wenatcheeworld.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com
 
2011-11-02 12:43:19 PM
Coco LaFemme: I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year. I understand there's disaffection, and that things aren't as good as they could be, but I refuse to see how anyone who at the least is a Moderate, could vote for anyone the GOP throws up there. What I'd love to do is walk up to one of these people ask ask them, "Look at where you are now. Do you think you'll be better off in 2016 than you are now, with Herman Cain/Mitt Romney/Rick Perry/Michele Bachmann/Newt Gingrich/Ron Paul/Rick Santorum as President?"

The Republicans have the answer, from the looks of their Candidate pool they are running Candidates that will force the 08 Obama voters who are dissatisfied with him to go "OMG if we don't vote, ______ will win and the country will really be screwed! To the Polls Maurice!"

I didn't vote him on 08 (3rd party) and am pretty Meh about his Meh performance, but looking at the assortment of fruits, nuts and flakes the Republicans are pushing- Huntsman seems to be the only sane candidate,- I most likely will vote for him just to save the Nation
 
2011-11-02 12:43:26 PM
sprawl15: I'm really, really hoping Romney doesn't win it, because I'd pay in the tens of dollars to watch a debate between, say, Obama and Santorum

No, I really hope Cain gets it because it'll be really fun to watch record low Republican votes for POTUS come with cries of "VOTER FRAUD" when it fact the racists decide to stay home, or maybe even vote for a crazy third party in high enough numbers that the right is impotent in its ability to spin it.

And trust me, Cain will provide amusement at the debates as well, don't worry about that.
 
2011-11-02 12:43:58 PM
hillbillypharmacist: InmanRoshi: Is this the continuatoin of the supposed "plummeting" of approval ratings from 49% to 44% I've been hearing about over the last 3 years.

[dancingczars.files.wordpress.com image 500x434]
How many times did we see this image back in late 2009?


Actually, that's the first time I've ever seen it.
 
2011-11-02 12:45:00 PM
Coco LaFemme: I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year. I understand there's disaffection, and that things aren't as good as they could be, but I refuse to see how anyone who at the least is a Moderate, could vote for anyone the GOP throws up there. What I'd love to do is walk up to one of these people ask ask them, "Look at where you are now. Do you think you'll be better off in 2016 than you are now, with Herman Cain/Mitt Romney/Rick Perry/Michele Bachmann/Newt Gingrich/Ron Paul/Rick Santorum as President?"

This is a real issue. Even if Obama could get the kind of engagement he had in 2008, the GOP has been doing everything they can to nullify Democrats' votes with gerrymandering, voter ID laws, purging the rolls and doing everything they can to boost their turnout with ballot initiatives about guns, gays, and God.

My take is that the RNC doesn't actually care about the presidential race. They are using it to drive the base to the polls to try to take over the Senate and gain more seats in the House. There are also a few governorships up for grabs.

The only candidate who has the kind of ability to drive turnout is Rick Perry. His team is scary good at it. They don't pay any attention to what anyone thinks except the base and they get them to the polls.

Likability doesn't matter.
Debates don't matter.
Minor scandals don't matter.

Who can get people registered and willing to vote is what matters. (And get those votes counted.)
 
2011-11-02 12:45:36 PM
Minus1Kelvin: sprawl15: I'm really, really hoping Romney doesn't win it, because I'd pay in the tens of dollars to watch a debate between, say, Obama and Santorum

No, I really hope Cain gets it because it'll be really fun to watch record low Republican votes for POTUS come with cries of "VOTER FRAUD" when it fact the racists decide to stay home, or maybe even vote for a crazy third party in high enough numbers that the right is impotent in its ability to spin it.

And trust me, Cain will provide amusement at the debates as well, don't worry about that.


The GOP will never run Cain. Look what they tried on McCain in 2000.
 
2011-11-02 12:52:19 PM
thamike: hillbillypharmacist: InmanRoshi: Is this the continuatoin of the supposed "plummeting" of approval ratings from 49% to 44% I've been hearing about over the last 3 years.

[dancingczars.files.wordpress.com image 500x434]
How many times did we see this image back in late 2009?

Actually, that's the first time I've ever seen it.


Me too, and I don't even have Vee or Meat on ignore. Seems like something they would post.
 
2011-11-02 12:53:41 PM
I want Cain just for the epic lulz of him campaigning in the south.
 
2011-11-02 12:53:46 PM
thamike: Actually, that's the first time I've ever seen it.

It was usually one of the now absent trolls.
 
2011-11-02 12:54:28 PM
HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:

lowered unemployment
increased unemployment insurance and lowered COBRA payments
lowered taxes
extended healthcare coverage
reformed finance law
led the killing of Osama bin Laden
increased gun rights
successfully assisted natural disasters relief
helped international relations to the U.S.

....and all in the face of the obstructionist Congress is United States history.


As of right now. He has my vote.


But he's a a Communist Nazi Muslim Socialist Peacenik Elitist Dhimmicrat Man-Child Egghead Celebrity Jihadist Appeaser Usurper Dictator Manchurian-Candidate Community-Organizer Cult-Leader Empty-Suit Tyrant Bureaucrat Hypocrite Non-Citizen America-Hater Arugula-Muncher Marxist Terrorist Liberal Leftist Stalinist Welfare-Statist Narcissist Plagiarist Murderer Islamofascist Sleeper-Cell Ghetto-Trash Blame-America-Firster Fearmonger Racist Atheist Kenyan Keynesian Militant Flag-Burner Gun-Grabber Union-Thug Anti-Semite Media-Darling Fifth-Columnist Ponzi-Schemer Vacation-Abuser Black-Liberationist Abortionist Antichrist Coward Traitor Liar Death-Panelist Affirmative-Action-Case Evolutionist Fraudster Pothead Alinskyite Taxaholic Spendthrift Job-Killer Puppetmaster Illegal-Alien Teleprompter-Addict Hip-Hop-Barbecuer Stutterer Non-Tipper Binder-Clipper Pizza-Cheese-Eater Face-Blocker Malware-Propagator Greenie-Weenie Grey-Poupon-Supremacist Long-Legged Mackdaddy!
 
2011-11-02 12:57:51 PM
I'm still holding out for Chris Christie.
 
2011-11-02 12:58:04 PM
I don't think it has to do with Obama's actions more than looking to the GOP and saying "Holy fark those people are crazy. I guess I'm stuck with this guy."
 
2011-11-02 12:58:08 PM
Coco LaFemme: I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year.

They wont, to some degree. The good news for Obama is he has 192 electoral votes of padding from 2008. He didn't exactly win in a squeeker. Looking at the 2012 Electoral Map, if he can just funnel that $1 billion war chest into winning Ohio, I really don't see how the GOP will pull out the the election. New Mexico and Iowa are turning pretty solid blue, and Pennsylvania is simply a pretty cut and dried solid blue state during Presidential elections no matter how much the media try to convey it otherwise.
 
2011-11-02 01:01:42 PM
I think his numbers will continue to go up when the country realizes the Republicans are planning to raise taxes on over half the country and Obama only wants to increase taxes on the wealthy.

Are you retired? Lost your job? Have 3 kids but make less than $20,000 a year? The Republicans are gonna raise your taxes because they think you're a parasite.

Obama's got it in the bag.
 
2011-11-02 01:02:27 PM
WizardofToast: I don't think it has to do with Obama's actions more than looking to the GOP and saying "Holy fark those people are crazy. I guess I'm stuck with this guy."

If you're left of center... or even left of Obama, you'd have to think that way. Otherwise you're just fooling yourself. It'd be a question of voting against your self interest or voting WAAAAAY against your self interest.
 
2011-11-02 01:03:07 PM
HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:
lowered unemployment


What lowered unemployment looks like:
www.theblaze.com

/blazing hot
 
2011-11-02 01:07:16 PM
So, if he dropped instead, would he be at:

Rabid porcupines running underfoot?
Electric-Eels swimming near pacemaker?
Possums playing undead?
 
2011-11-02 01:07:31 PM
Mercutio74: WizardofToast: I don't think it has to do with Obama's actions more than looking to the GOP and saying "Holy fark those people are crazy. I guess I'm stuck with this guy."

If you're left of center... or even left of Obama, you'd have to think that way. Otherwise you're just fooling yourself. It'd be a question of voting against your self interest or voting WAAAAAY against your self interest.


Nah. I would rather let the country get buttfarked all at once rather than by the degrees that the spineless Democrats are doing it by.

Besides, Obama is winning my state hands down. Hell, the rich people here have Obama bumper stickers on their Beamers. That gives me the freedom to vote my conscience, which means that I will vote for one of the bigger parties to the left of the Democrats in the presidential election.
 
2011-11-02 01:10:02 PM
sprawl15: meat0918: ginandbacon: BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

How?

Are they gearing up to take out RINOs like Boehner, or is that general sentiment?

I could see them being very excited right now imagining their candidate (be it Santorum, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, etc.) winning. I want to see that number after the convention bruises some egos.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly how it'll turn out; a whole lot of people glad that their idiotic candidate has a chance this year, and then a whole bunch of rage when a different idiotic candidate gets chosen to lose against Obama.



On a semi-related note: apparently Freeperville just finished a purge. Most of the known Romney supporters have gotten the boot over at FR, and a few are clamoring for the PAULines to be the next ones up against the wall.

Per the Freeper Madness site, apparently the same thing happened with the Giulliani supporters last time around.

/JokerPopcorn.gif
 
2011-11-02 01:12:27 PM
Smelly McUgly: Mercutio74: WizardofToast: I don't think it has to do with Obama's actions more than looking to the GOP and saying "Holy fark those people are crazy. I guess I'm stuck with this guy."

If you're left of center... or even left of Obama, you'd have to think that way. Otherwise you're just fooling yourself. It'd be a question of voting against your self interest or voting WAAAAAY against your self interest.

Nah. I would rather let the country get buttfarked all at once rather than by the degrees that the spineless Democrats are doing it by.

Besides, Obama is winning my state hands down. Hell, the rich people here have Obama bumper stickers on their Beamers. That gives me the freedom to vote my conscience, which means that I will vote for one of the bigger parties to the left of the Democrats in the presidential election.


What the US (and Canada) really needs is a modern electoral system where instead of just whoever gets the most votes wins, instant runoff voting. It gives a clearer picture of what the public wants.
 
2011-11-02 01:16:24 PM
Wasteland: sprawl15: meat0918: ginandbacon: BUT, Republicans are way more enthusiastic about 2012:

How?

Are they gearing up to take out RINOs like Boehner, or is that general sentiment?

I could see them being very excited right now imagining their candidate (be it Santorum, Perry, Romney, Bachmann, etc.) winning. I want to see that number after the convention bruises some egos.

I'm pretty sure that's exactly how it'll turn out; a whole lot of people glad that their idiotic candidate has a chance this year, and then a whole bunch of rage when a different idiotic candidate gets chosen to lose against Obama.


On a semi-related note: apparently Freeperville just finished a purge. Most of the known Romney supporters have gotten the boot over at FR, and a few are clamoring for the PAULines to be the next ones up against the wall.

Per the Freeper Madness site, apparently the same thing happened with the Giulliani supporters last time around.

/JokerPopcorn.gif


So who are they supporting?

/Is that buttered?
 
2011-11-02 01:22:19 PM
HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:

lowered unemployment
increased unemployment insurance and lowered COBRA payments
lowered taxes
extended healthcare coverage
reformed finance law
led the killing of Osama bin Laden
increased gun rights
successfully assisted natural disasters relief
helped international relations to the U.S.

....and all in the face of the obstructionist Congress is United States history.


As of right now. He has my vote.


THIS
 
2011-11-02 01:26:59 PM
soy_bomb: HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:
lowered unemployment

What lowered unemployment looks like:
[www.theblaze.com image 620x458]

/blazing hot


10.1 - 9.1 = 1. So... yes.
 
2011-11-02 01:30:24 PM
The subtext here is that the economy has actually been slowly grinding its way back up towards the light and people are starting to feel it.
 
2011-11-02 01:38:28 PM
Intrade shows Mitt at 70% and they have a fairly good track record. I suspect it will come down to which fringe doesn't show for the election: the tea baggers on the Right or the progressives on the Left.
 
2011-11-02 01:41:09 PM
LasersHurt: soy_bomb: HellRaisingHoosier: President Obama has:
lowered unemployment

What lowered unemployment looks like:
[www.theblaze.com image 620x458]

/blazing hot

10.1 - 9.1 = 1. So... yes.


Unemployment is at a higher rate than it was prior to him entering office. No spin can cause that to mean "Obama has lowered unemployment"
 
2011-11-02 01:41:40 PM
Edsel: The subtext here is that the economy has actually been slowly grinding its way back up towards the light and people are starting to feel it.

You know, if our entire government was working together to bring back our economy and a sense of well-being instead of acting like partisan twats, I believe we would be a lot further along in our recovery.

The farkers who would try are actively trying to further tank the economy, just to stage some misguided political coup, need to be tarred and feathered.
 
2011-11-02 01:42:29 PM
Car_Ramrod: Coco LaFemme: I still worry about the people who voted for him in 2008 not voting for him again next year. I understand there's disaffection, and that things aren't as good as they could be, but I refuse to see how anyone who at the least is a Moderate, could vote for anyone the GOP throws up there. What I'd love to do is walk up to one of these people ask ask them, "Look at where you are now. Do you think you'll be better off in 2016 than you are now, with Herman Cain/Mitt Romney/Rick Perry/Michele Bachmann/Newt Gingrich/Ron Paul/Rick Santorum as President?"

The thing is, those people just won't vote. They'll say, "I'll show Obama and the Dems they can't just assume my vote without playing directly towards me and doing everything I want them to do!" Then Republicans take power, the country goes to shiat, and they'll complain about voters being stupid.

I've heard people say, "I won't vote if they don't play to me", when in reality, politicians won't play to you if you don't vote. Why are all the major Republican candidates crazy people? Because crazy right wingers came out in 2010, so they want to grab those votes. No one's vying for the "I voted for Obama in 2008, so I can just stay home in 2010" vote because they're not dependable as voters.

I've made this point before, but just look at the debt ceiling fiasco:

Some 66% of the two groups (GOP/Tea Party) followed news on the issue closely versus only 34% of those who had different views or did not offer a political opinion. Nor were they passive observers: some 20% of Republicans and Tea Partiers contacted an elected official during the standoff while only 5% of the rest did the same. This despite a direct appeal from President Obama to do exactly that.

Show some participation and action in the political process, and you might see results.


My response is a simple one to those hesitating about Obama in 2012 that did vote for Obama in 2008:

See what happened in Wisconsin with Scott Walker? That'll happen if a Republican gets elected President.

So Vote Obama.
 
Displayed 50 of 141 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »