not this chic again. i thought we were done with this coont.

Now that was unexpected

/obligatory
//hot like tot mom

So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that.

They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that.

They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

what?

Don't worry, Georgia killed an innocent (by public opinion) man to make up for it.

/I thought we'd forgotten about her
//why the hell is she getting so much more attention than Zahra Baker's parents?

whitey_d: [picture.funnycorner.net image 640x512]

/obligatory
//hot like tot mom

Beat me to it. That's the first thing that popped into my head as well :)

Thread is useless without nudes

Well, of course she pulled the 5th. She's guilty, she knows it, anything she says she'd be incriminating herself.

bk3k: Thread is useless without nudes

That goes for most threads, doesn't it?

A Terrible Human: Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that.

They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

When Caylee was reported missing in July 2008 -- a month after she was last seen -- Anthony maintained she had been kidnapped by her nanny, Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez.

Authorities were never able to find the nanny. But they did find Gonzalez, who claimed she never met Anthony or her daughter.

Gonzalez's attorneys claim, according to questions asked of Anthony in the October 8 deposition, that Gonzalez was questioned by the police in Caylee's disappearance, was kicked out of her apartment complex, lost her job and that she and her two daughters received death threats as a result of media attention in the case.

Anthony herself said little in the deposition, but did acknowledge she was aware she was being sued by Gonzalez.

Seems like the woman who Casey Anthony accused of kidnapping her child is suing her for that.

Do miss read that.

I cant wait to kill my first newborn and party like its 1999

Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that.

They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

They want the money for the search effort. Since her defense was that she knew all along that the kid was dead and just didn't want to rat on her parents, they wasted time and money looking for a "missing" child.

That said, this was probably the smartest thing she has ever done.

BurnShrike: bk3k: Thread is useless without nudes

That goes for most all threads, doesn't it?

ftfy

ThisNameSux: Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that.

They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

what?

"Anthony has also been ordered to repay more than $217,000 to authorities for the costs of investigating Caylee's disappearance"

Last line of the article. But has people have pointed out its for the Search vs the Trial. They maybe able to get that back.

So... any of you watch that Judge William Adams video?

Read Leonard Levy's "Origins of the Fifth Amendment" if you think the Fifth is only a get-out-of-jail-free card for the obviously guilty.

I haven't seen a case botched this badly since OJ.

This will surely make Nancy Grace's head explode with indignation.

/Hey, I can dream.
//Media frenzies provide better justice than trials, right?

JackalRabbit: BurnShrike: bk3k: Thread is useless without nudes

That goes for most all threads, doesn't it?

ftfy

Not this thread Link (new window)

I thought that once you took the fifth, they didn't bother asking any more questions as once you took the fifth, there's no point in answering anything else as it then may undo the choice to not answer in the first place.

How does Casey Anthony take the fifth when she's been already been acquitted for the crimes she was accused?

Jake Havechek: I haven't seen a case botched this badly since OJ.

I don't think the case was botched. Her defense just pushed all of the blame on her father and painted him as a child molesting dictator that molested her, and possibly her daughter, and forced her to cover up the accidental death of her daughter to keep the fact that he was molesting her hidden. And guess what, in this age of men are evil the jury bought it.

Befuddled: I thought that once you took the fifth, they didn't bother asking any more questions as once you took the fifth, there's no point in answering anything else as it then may undo the choice to not answer in the first place.

How does Casey Anthony take the fifth when she's been already been acquitted for the crimes she was accused?

Civil case from another party is how.

Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that. They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

You might want to try reading the article.

ongbok: Jake Havechek: I haven't seen a case botched this badly since OJ.

I don't think the case was botched. Her defense just pushed all of the blame on her father and painted him as a child molesting dictator that molested her, and possibly her daughter, and forced her to cover up the accidental death of her daughter to keep the fact that he was molesting her hidden. And guess what, in this age of men are evil the jury bought it.

Not having any evidence to tie her to the crime was probably an issue as well.

Okay, fine, the article does say Anthony has been ordered to repay the cost of searching for her kid.

Anyway, she definately should repay. They may not have gotten a conviction on the murder charge, but she did admit to burying her daughter. So it's on the record that she sent the cops on a wild goose chase for a daughter she knew to be dead. I don't see any reason why she shouldn't pay that money back.

I'd still fark her.

Wytchone: Civil case from another party is how.

Does the fifth amendment right extend to civil cases? You can't be called to testify as the defendant in a criminal trial but you can be called to testify as the defendant in a civil trial.

Anthony maintained she had been kidnapped by her nanny, Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. Authorities were never able to find the nanny. But they did find Gonzalez

These lines make no sense. They found her, but didn't?

Andulamb: Anyway, she definately should repay. They may not have gotten a conviction on the murder charge, but she did admit to burying her daughter. So it's on the record that she sent the cops on a wild goose chase for a daughter she knew to be dead. I don't see any reason why she shouldn't pay that money back.

Seriously ? I hadn't heard that. Wow.

So this biatch admitted to burying her daughter? But she walks free?

SN1987a goes boom: Anthony maintained she had been kidnapped by her nanny, Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez. Authorities were never able to find the nanny. But they did find Gonzalez

These lines make no sense. They found her, but didn't?

They found a woman of the same name but she wasn't Caylee's nanny.

homeschooled: That case is stupid to begin with. For them to successfully sue her, they have to prove Casey Anthony lied about THAT Zenaida Gonzalez and slandered her intentionally. And the woman admitted she had never spoken or met Anthony. So..... I mean...... that right there proves there was no intent. So they have no case

The connection is that this woman looked at an apartment in the complex where Casey said she lived and cared for Caylee, and filled out paperwork for it before deciding to rent somewhere else. At the same time, Casey was staying in the complex with friends, and it is believed she snagged Zenaida's paperwork with her personal info on it, not realizing that Zenaida later decided not to rent the apartment.

That's how this specific Zenaida was targeted.

Andulamb: Wytchone: So they bungled the case, she won and they want her to pay the money back?
Fark that. They should not have blown the case , they should not get the money back from her.

You might want to try reading the article.

End of the Article hos.

Befuddled: Wytchone: Civil case from another party is how.

Does the fifth amendment right extend to civil cases? You can't be called to testify as the defendant in a criminal trial but you can be called to testify as the defendant in a civil trial.

Good question maybe some nice farker will pipe up and answer. I suspect yes but I cant say with 100% you can.

Hey, it worked for our governor during his Medicaid fraud trial...

Hey, Baby Lisa is cute, white, and female. Why don't we have three threads a day about her?

What?

Where are the Casey Anthony boobies I was promised?