"The Ephebophile Express" didn't have the same snap.

How do you make a ho' holler?

When I was 16, I slept with a guy from Virginia. 16 is the age of consent here, but it's 18 where he was. Statutory rape ftw!
/yes, it was consensual
//no, he didn't get caught and no, I didn't press charges

You'd think there would be more to this story. There's not.

That is why it is so awesome.

Forgot to mention he was 24. Stupid no editing option.

TheOther: How do you make a ho' holler?

Try to sneak in through the back door...

In a couple months it'll be the Ho Ho Ho Hauler.

/Here all week.

pizen: hobblekitty: Would this be better?

[i107.photobucket.com image 250x180]

Or this:

[candyaddict.com image 400x196]

Shakes tiny fist

So the federal courts are accepting $10k as part of the plea deal and are so indirectly benefiting off child trafficking and prostitution. Why are they bargaining with this scumbag anyways?

Man or Astro-man?

Somebody wrote something here too, said "Pimp Wagon"

hobblekitty: Would this be better?

[i107.photobucket.com image 250x180]

better? no...was the first thing I thought of tho...
missmez: This would have been my favorite fark headline of the week if I hadn't read the article. How horrid and pathetic.

That'll teach me to RTFA.

yeah, this was the second thing I thought.

/damn us. damn us all to hell

colithian: When I was 16, I slept with a guy from Virginia. 16 is the age of consent here, but it's 18 where he was. Statutory rape ftw!
/yes, it was consensual
//no, he didn't get caught and no, I didn't press charges

slut

His mugshot goes to show that pimps arn't all Caddies and sharp looking feathered hats..

Oh, Crabman, what kind of crazy antics will you be up to next?

colithian: Forgot to mention he was 24. Stupid no editing option.

That took it into the creepy zone.

If you are 24 and you are sleeping with a 16 year old, you are just being sketchy. There is no reason a 24 year old dude should have any problem picking up women in the legal age bracket, so unless you dramatically mis-represented your age and had a body to back it up, you were screwing a guy with "issues."

Legit.

The WindowLicker: There is no reason a 24 year old dude should have any problem picking up women in the legal age bracket, so unless you dramatically mis-represented your age and had a body to back it up, you were screwing a guy with "issues."

No no, he really was moving them across state lines to prostitute them. He's a real scumbag. No two ways about it.

"He felt entitled to do whatever he wanted with his property...."

In other words, he is a typical liberal.

The article says he turned over 10k and the van as part of a plea bargain. Then it goes on to say he's looking at life in prison. Am I missing something? Why would he plea bargain if he's getting life anyway?

Maybe it's the difference between "you are very likely going to prison for life" vs. "you are definitely going to prison for life?"

phunkey_monkey: "He felt entitled to do whatever he wanted with his property...."

In other words, he is a typical liberal.

Huh. Gun nuts are liberal now.

See, this is what happens when big government regulations enforce their "Truth in advertising" laws.

colithian: When I was 16, I slept with a guy from Virginia. 16 is the age of consent here, but it's 18 where he was. Statutory rape ftw!
/yes, it was consensual
//no, he didn't get caught and no, I didn't press charges

Then what does a gold plated van do?

vernonFL: The U.S. Attorney's Office says as part of a plea agreement, Patrick gave up more than $10,000 from the sex trafficking operation, and the van.The U.S. Attorney's Office says as part of a plea agreement, Patrick gave up more than $10,000 from the sex trafficking operation, and the van.

Hopefully they auction the van.

I am also gonna be hella amused when the auction for a gold-plated "Ho Hauler" van shows up. I mean, AFAIK they don't have a lot of options other than auction for disposal, and probably wouldn't be able to repaint it, that would cost more than a 1992 van is worth. If it's inherently illegal, like pot, it'd get incinerated, but this isn't, and policy is rather sensitive due to a high potential for abuse.

You could remove the "Ho Hauler", I suppose, but then someone's gotta authorize someone else to damage property in the lockup. Which, generally, you're not supposed to do.

So, yeah, I expect the cops will be selling a gold Ho Hauler soon...

Your name is Buck, RIGHT?

Fista-Phobia: Man or Astro-man?

[racineusedcardealer.com image 300x225]

Bravo.

/sees what you did there

Five Minute Standup: colithian: When I was 16, I slept with a guy from Virginia. 16 is the age of consent here, but it's 18 where he was. Statutory rape ftw!
/yes, it was consensual
//no, he didn't get caught and no, I didn't press charges

[i379.photobucket.com image 102x140]

Thought the same. Didn't think their story really had any relevance either unless they were charging the guy to sleep with them since the article is about human trafficking and under-aged prostitution.

Who the hell painted that van? Patrick Tribett?

/if not, he should've

FTA "It's just demeaning that he was riding those girls around in that type of van," Pitre said.

Yeah, that's the demeaning part.

The WindowLicker: That took it into the creepy zone.

What about a 26 y/o male and an 18 y/o female? Is that in the "creepy" zone?

aspAddict: The WindowLicker: That took it into the creepy zone.

What about a 26 y/o male and an 18 y/o female? Is that in the "creepy" zone?

Less so, but still there. When the age difference is that large, it is very likely that the two individuals are going to be at substantially different levels of emotional and psychological development. While there is nothing wrong with a purely physical relationship, one that also includes an age gap like that is much more likely to be an unhealthy one in which the more developed partner is exploiting the other. Think of it as a metaphorical roofie.

Even in college, the upper level students that would only date first semester freshmen were creepy.

I am not saying these are hard and fast rules, I am sure that there are lots of exceptions, but overall it just looks wrong.

Hell, even reverse the roles like the various teachers and their young male students. While the guys may be willing participants (not exactly traditional victims), you have to wonder about the mentality of a woman who chooses the forbidden fruit over someone legal.

Execute him now, we cannot tolerate this scum.

Mearen: FTA "It's just demeaning that he was riding those girls around in that type of van," Pitre said.

Yeah, that's the demeaning part.

This was my reaction to the article.

The WindowLicker: aspAddict: The WindowLicker: That took it into the creepy zone.

What about a 26 y/o male and an 18 y/o female? Is that in the "creepy" zone?

Less so, but still there. When the age difference is that large, it is very likely that the two individuals are going to be at substantially different levels of emotional and psychological development. While there is nothing wrong with a purely physical relationship, one that also includes an age gap like that is much more likely to be an unhealthy one in which the more developed partner is exploiting the other. Think of it as a metaphorical roofie.

Even in college, the upper level students that would only date first semester freshmen were creepy.

I am not saying these are hard and fast rules, I am sure that there are lots of exceptions, but overall it just looks wrong.

Hell, even reverse the roles like the various teachers and their young male students. While the guys may be willing participants (not exactly traditional victims), you have to wonder about the mentality of a woman who chooses the forbidden fruit over someone legal.

The creepiness calculator:
age/2 + 7

/22 for me; I can barely even date college seniors anymore :[

damn eddie really has gone downhill

Subby,
then than.

farkingbubbler: Who the hell painted that van? Patrick Tribett?

/if not, he should've

Painting a Ho Hauler is a waste of perfectly good gold paint. --Patrick Tribett

StrangeQ: The WindowLicker: aspAddict: The WindowLicker: That took it into the creepy zone.

What about a 26 y/o male and an 18 y/o female? Is that in the "creepy" zone?

Less so, but still there. When the age difference is that large, it is very likely that the two individuals are going to be at substantially different levels of emotional and psychological development. While there is nothing wrong with a purely physical relationship, one that also includes an age gap like that is much more likely to be an unhealthy one in which the more developed partner is exploiting the other. Think of it as a metaphorical roofie.

Even in college, the upper level students that would only date first semester freshmen were creepy.

I am not saying these are hard and fast rules, I am sure that there are lots of exceptions, but overall it just looks wrong.

Hell, even reverse the roles like the various teachers and their young male students. While the guys may be willing participants (not exactly traditional victims), you have to wonder about the mentality of a woman who chooses the forbidden fruit over someone legal.

The creepiness calculator:
age/2 + 7

/22 for me; I can barely even date college seniors anymore :[

I thought it was age=2+7.... I think I need to go take care of something.... totally unrelated: does anyone have an extra supply of lye?