If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Rolling Stone) Spiffy How Obama intervened in Libya--and wound up toppling one of the world's longest-serving dictators   (rollingstone.com) divider line 118
More: Spiffy, Libyan, dictators  
•       •       •

3020 clicks; posted to Politics » on 23 Oct 2011 at 1:57 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



118 Comments   (+0 »)
   

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-10-23 10:00:13 AM
i52.tinypic.com

"President Obama had nothing to do with toppling Douchebag Quadbike. The brave sailors of the United States Navy voluntarily took their ships, submarines, and planes to the Med. The cruise missiles left their silos with a device created by Real Americans™ so seek out evildoers and secure freedom for the Islamic heathens of Libya. Which will now be a terrorist safe-haven and launch daily attacks on the American Homeland. I just want to thank France and Germany for coddling our enemies and proving that socialism doesn't work."
 
2011-10-23 10:04:22 AM
He used the Gulf War model of joint international forces against a dictator that had no strong ties to the Middle East or Africa. This model US international relations used to be called "Speak softly and carry a big stick."
 
2011-10-23 10:37:52 AM
WTF Indeed: He used the Gulf War model of joint international forces against a dictator that had no strong ties to the Middle East or Africa. This model US international relations used to be called "Speak softly and carry a big stick."

I actually like this better than the "scream, stamp your feet, and act like a petulant two-year-old who's just lost his wowwypop" model.
 
2011-10-23 10:40:54 AM
Time will tell if taking out all these strongmen was a good idea or not.

Taking out Assad seems like the next step in the Arab Spring, but like Saddam, Qaddafi, and Mubarak, rival factions and radical Islam was kept in check through the heavy hand of the dictator. The power vacuum invites theocracy and training grounds for radical Islam to take root and poison these countries.
 
2011-10-23 10:42:38 AM
unlikely: WTF Indeed: He used the Gulf War model of joint international forces against a dictator that had no strong ties to the Middle East or Africa. This model US international relations used to be called "Speak softly and carry a big stick."

I actually like this better than the "scream, stamp your feet, and act like a petulant two-year-old who's just lost his wowwypop" model.


Or the "arm them for 30 years and then fight them for 30 years" model.
 
2011-10-23 10:46:13 AM
WTF Indeed: He used the Gulf War model of joint international forces against a dictator that had no strong ties to the Middle East or Africa. This model US international relations used to be shall be called "Speak softly and carry a big stick." "Smartbongo."
 
2011-10-23 10:46:19 AM
Howie Spankowitz: Or the "arm them for 30 years and then fight them for 30 years" model.

Yes, but that is a very profitable model.
 
2011-10-23 11:04:24 AM
Truly enjoyed this article. It gave an interesting look inside the Obama administration, including strengths and weaknesses.
 
2011-10-23 11:10:17 AM
"longest serving dictators" subby? Really?

That word. I don' t think...
 
2011-10-23 11:15:48 AM
Americans taking credit for something. This is new!
 
2011-10-23 11:16:27 AM
I thought the headline was some sort of reverse deep troll, but lead to an interesting article*. Thanks submitter!

*article interesting to policy wonks
 
2011-10-23 11:25:41 AM
Ah yes, it's all Obama's doing. The Libyans had nothing to do with it. *eye roll*

/dnrtfa
//but subby's headline annoys me
 
2011-10-23 11:28:01 AM
snuff3r: Americans taking credit for something. This is new!

coco ebert: Ah yes, it's all Obama's doing. The Libyans had nothing to do with it. *eye roll*

/dnrtfa
//but subby's headline annoys me


Indeed.
 
2011-10-23 11:31:53 AM
muck4doo: snuff3r: Americans taking credit for something. This is new!

coco ebert: Ah yes, it's all Obama's doing. The Libyans had nothing to do with it. *eye roll*

/dnrtfa
//but subby's headline annoys me

Indeed.



What happened to "America's Third War!"?

www.bitlogic.com
 
2011-10-23 11:42:47 AM
We did enough and no more. I'll repeat that. We did enough and no more.

We have gotten the result we wanted without any loss of American life and at a fraction of a percent of the cost of Iraq or Afghanistan. Conservatives and even some liberals have complaint about Obama putting us into 3, 4, 5 wars in addition to Iraq. You know what? If they have the same costs and results of our work in Libya, I would rather have 50 wars like that then just two Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

The Libyans did all the work? Well, we helped, and enforcing the NATO policies kept the rebels from being completely crushed in the early stages of the war. And we got what we wanted at very, very small expense.

Obama didn't lead troops to march into Quadafi's home and shoot him. He did, however, make the decisions that led to us getting what we wanted at a tiny fraction of what Iraq or Afghanistan are still costing.
 
2011-10-23 12:11:14 PM
NewportBarGuy: Douchebag Quadbike.

this is the point were lols were produced.
 
2011-10-23 12:15:13 PM
Bloody William: We did enough and no more. I'll repeat that. We did enough and no more.

We have gotten the result we wanted without any loss of American life and at a fraction of a percent of the cost of Iraq or Afghanistan. Conservatives and even some liberals have complaint about Obama putting us into 3, 4, 5 wars in addition to Iraq. You know what? If they have the same costs and results of our work in Libya, I would rather have 50 wars like that then just two Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

The Libyans did all the work? Well, we helped, and enforcing the NATO policies kept the rebels from being completely crushed in the early stages of the war. And we got what we wanted at very, very small expense.

Obama didn't lead troops to march into Quadafi's home and shoot him. He did, however, make the decisions that led to us getting what we wanted at a tiny fraction of what Iraq or Afghanistan are still costing.


Be gone! For among these posts shalt thou find no ease, neither shall the sole of thy facts have rest: but the LORD shall give farkers there a trembling heart, and failing of logic, and sorrow of mind.
 
2011-10-23 12:32:04 PM
For those angry at the disproportion of credit the article gives America in the Libyan Arab Spring, remember we won this war like France won the American Revolution.
 
2011-10-23 12:33:22 PM
Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?
 
2011-10-23 12:33:47 PM
unlikely: WTF Indeed: He used the Gulf War model of joint international forces against a dictator that had no strong ties to the Middle East or Africa. This model US international relations used to be called "Speak softly and carry a big stick."

I actually like this better than the "scream, stamp your feet, and act like a petulant two-year-old who's just lost his wowwypop" model.


razboynik13.files.wordpress.com

/Agrees.
 
2011-10-23 12:47:40 PM
dopeydwarf: /Agrees.

What does Sam Houston have to do with this?
 
2011-10-23 12:53:55 PM
The Iconoclast: Smartbongo

lol
 
2011-10-23 01:15:48 PM
Bloody William: We did enough and no more. I'll repeat that. We did enough and no more.

We have gotten the result we wanted without any loss of American life and at a fraction of a percent of the cost of Iraq or Afghanistan. Conservatives and even some liberals have complaint about Obama putting us into 3, 4, 5 wars in addition to Iraq. You know what? If they have the same costs and results of our work in Libya, I would rather have 50 wars like that then just two Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

The Libyans did all the work? Well, we helped, and enforcing the NATO policies kept the rebels from being completely crushed in the early stages of the war. And we got what we wanted at very, very small expense.

Obama didn't lead troops to march into Quadafi's home and shoot him. He did, however, make the decisions that led to us getting what we wanted at a tiny fraction of what Iraq or Afghanistan are still costing.


Actually about the costs... the new Libyan government, on the unfreezing of Gaddafi's assets: "You know what? Before you send us that money, just take from it whatever it costed NATO, send it to the countries that helped us. This won't cost a dime for you, thanks for the help, much appreciated!!!"
 
2011-10-23 01:20:18 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: Time will tell if taking out all these strongmen was a good idea or not.

Taking out Assad seems like the next step in the Arab Spring, but like Saddam, Qaddafi, and Mubarak, rival factions and radical Islam was kept in check through the heavy hand of the dictator. The power vacuum invites theocracy and training grounds for radical Islam to take root and poison these countries.


Many Brits do feel the world has never been right since that whole 'American Independence' unpleasantness.
 
2011-10-23 01:27:19 PM
Ender's: For those angry at the disproportion of credit the article gives America in the Libyan Arab Spring, remember we won this war like France won the American Revolution.


The US would not have won the Revolution without France.
 
2011-10-23 01:37:26 PM
vygramul: The US would not have won the Revolution without France.

You're catching on.
 
2011-10-23 02:03:30 PM
I thought it was the Yankees.
 
2011-10-23 02:04:29 PM
Occam's Chainsaw: vygramul: The US would not have won the Revolution without France.

You're catching on.


It also helped that Paul Revere rang church bells and warned the British about our guns.

/sorry, couldn't resist
 
2011-10-23 02:05:25 PM
img.photobucket.com
 
2011-10-23 02:05:57 PM
Where's the appended "miss me yet?" demotivator?

/posting from phone, too hard to do myself
 
2011-10-23 02:07:00 PM
Nina_Hartley's_Ass: I thought it was the Yankees.

No, that year it was the Dodgers.
 
2011-10-23 02:12:09 PM
AverageAmericanGuy: The power vacuum invites theocracy

Invites? It looks like it's already grabbed the reins

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/10/23/calls-for-investigation-as-a ut opsy-reveals-qaddafi-died-from-gunshot-to-head/ (new window)

"The transitional government leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil set out a vision for the post-Qaddafi future with an Islamist tint, saying that Islamic Sharia law would be the "basic source" of legislation in the country and that existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified."
 
2011-10-23 02:12:21 PM
serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Actually, the "bad thing" was getting involved in a ground war in a country roughly five times the size of Libya based on specious intelligence and blatant lies about Saddam Hussein's involvement with the 9/11 attacks.
 
2011-10-23 02:12:31 PM
The same people that are giving Obama a beej over this are the ones that were complaining about opening a third theater of war(or third quagmire). As always, hangers-on will do as they do
 
2011-10-23 02:12:51 PM
NewportBarGuy: [i52.tinypic.com image 420x277]

"President Obama had nothing to do with toppling Douchebag Quadbike. The brave sailors of the United States Navy voluntarily took their ships, submarines, and planes to the Med. The cruise missiles left their silos with a device created by Real Americans™ so seek out evildoers and secure freedom for the Islamic heathens of Libya. Which will now be a terrorist safe-haven and launch daily attacks on the American Homeland. I just want to thank France and Germany for coddling our enemies and proving that socialism doesn't work."


Thanks. That article seemed too long to read. It more or less confirms what they are saying on the radio that Obama's intervention in Libya has created more instability in that region, not less.
 
2011-10-23 02:13:44 PM
serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Err, Lockerbie?
 
2011-10-23 02:15:19 PM
Delay: NewportBarGuy: [i52.tinypic.com image 420x277]

"President Obama had nothing to do with toppling Douchebag Quadbike. The brave sailors of the United States Navy voluntarily took their ships, submarines, and planes to the Med. The cruise missiles left their silos with a device created by Real Americans™ so seek out evildoers and secure freedom for the Islamic heathens of Libya. Which will now be a terrorist safe-haven and launch daily attacks on the American Homeland. I just want to thank France and Germany for coddling our enemies and proving that socialism doesn't work."

Thanks. That article seemed too long to read. It more or less confirms what they are saying on the radio that Obama's intervention in Libya has created more instability in that region, not less.


"They"?
 
2011-10-23 02:17:20 PM
bhcompy: The same people that are giving Obama a beej over this are the ones that were complaining about opening a third theater of war(or third quagmire). As always, hangers-on will do as they do

Do you believe the US is now in a quagmire in Libya?
 
2011-10-23 02:17:31 PM
HighOnCraic: serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Actually, the "bad thing" was getting involved in a ground war in a country roughly five times the size of Libya based on specious intelligence and blatant lies about Saddam Hussein's involvement with the 9/11 attacks.


Iraq - total area 438,317 sq km

Libya - total area 1,759,541 km

five times the size of what now?
 
2011-10-23 02:20:00 PM
Bloody William: We did enough and no more. I'll repeat that. We did enough and no more.

We have gotten the result we wanted without any loss of American life and at a fraction of a percent of the cost of Iraq or Afghanistan. Conservatives and even some liberals have complaint about Obama putting us into 3, 4, 5 wars in addition to Iraq. You know what? If they have the same costs and results of our work in Libya, I would rather have 50 wars like that then just two Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

The Libyans did all the work? Well, we helped, and enforcing the NATO policies kept the rebels from being completely crushed in the early stages of the war. And we got what we wanted at very, very small expense.

Obama didn't lead troops to march into Quadafi's home and shoot him. He did, however, make the decisions that led to us getting what we wanted at a tiny fraction of what Iraq or Afghanistan are still costing.




I agree on all points. Of course President Obama didn't personally jump in the mix, but he made critical decisions that worked -- and he has done so, successfully, on numerous occasions. At this point, any organizations looking to hurt America had better think twice. We have an intelligent President who doesn't lose his cool and make dumb decisions.

The dude is 2 - 0
 
2011-10-23 02:20:32 PM
The congressmen were stunned. "It wasn't a consultation," recalls one staffer. "It was an announcement." Sen. Richard Lugar, a Republican known for his bipartisanship and his expertise on foreign policy, was particularly incensed. He launched into a volley of tough questions: Who's going to pay for the war? How much is it going to cost? What does it mean to Iran, Syria? Clinton and Gates were both present, but the answers they gave didn't satisfy the senator. "They punted all those issues," says a source with direct knowledge of the meeting.

fark you Lugar, fark you so hard. NO ONE in your party has the right to ask that. You sacks of shiat. You didn't care about Afghanistan or Iraq with cost FAR more then Libya.
 
2011-10-23 02:21:25 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: AverageAmericanGuy: The power vacuum invites theocracy

Invites? It looks like it's already grabbed the reins

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/10/23/calls-for-investigation-as-a ut opsy-reveals-qaddafi-died-from-gunshot-to-head/ (new window)

"The transitional government leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil set out a vision for the post-Qaddafi future with an Islamist tint, saying that Islamic Sharia law would be the "basic source" of legislation in the country and that existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified."



Why aren't those stupid Lybians choosing an American-style fundamentalist Christian theocracy??!!?
 
2011-10-23 02:24:20 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: HighOnCraic: serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Actually, the "bad thing" was getting involved in a ground war in a country roughly five times the size of Libya based on specious intelligence and blatant lies about Saddam Hussein's involvement with the 9/11 attacks.

Iraq - total area 438,317 sq km

Libya - total area 1,759,541 km

five times the size of what now?


Sorry, I meant population-wise.

Iraq
Population - 2011 estimate 30,399,572[1] (36th)


Libya
Population - 2011 estimate 6.6 million[3][4] (102nd
 
2011-10-23 02:24:38 PM
img217.imageshack.us
 
2011-10-23 02:40:14 PM
Occam's Chainsaw: vygramul: The US would not have won the Revolution without France.

You're catching on.



I caught on decades ago.
 
2011-10-23 02:42:53 PM
HighOnCraic: Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: HighOnCraic: serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Actually, the "bad thing" was getting involved in a ground war in a country roughly five times the size of Libya based on specious intelligence and blatant lies about Saddam Hussein's involvement with the 9/11 attacks.

Iraq - total area 438,317 sq km

Libya - total area 1,759,541 km

five times the size of what now?

Sorry, I meant population-wise.

Iraq
Population - 2011 estimate 30,399,572[1] (36th)


Libya
Population - 2011 estimate 6.6 million[3][4] (102nd


Ahhh ok. Thought maybe my recollection of geography was getting even worse.
 
2011-10-23 02:47:26 PM
4.bp.blogspot.com

Of course removing Qaddafi was a mistake. Intervention in Libya will only result in anti-American sentiment...
 
2011-10-23 02:47:34 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: HighOnCraic: Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: HighOnCraic: serial_crusher: Wasn't going around toppling dictators who hadn't done anything to us a bad thing during the Bush Administration?

Actually, the "bad thing" was getting involved in a ground war in a country roughly five times the size of Libya based on specious intelligence and blatant lies about Saddam Hussein's involvement with the 9/11 attacks.

Iraq - total area 438,317 sq km

Libya - total area 1,759,541 km

five times the size of what now?

Sorry, I meant population-wise.

Iraq
Population - 2011 estimate 30,399,572[1] (36th)


Libya
Population - 2011 estimate 6.6 million[3][4] (102nd

Ahhh ok. Thought maybe my recollection of geography was getting even worse.


No worries, I should've phrased it better.
 
2011-10-23 02:47:42 PM
Its amazing what can happen when a president that is just quietly competent is allowed to do his job. No wonder he bypassed the Republicans. I would too. He tried to include them in health reform and the economic policies, look what a clusterfk that turned into. Meanwhile foreign policy's been more success than failure since he's come in. And mostly cleaning up more messes left by Republicans.

Got my vote, unless a magic Republican thats actually small government and not a war starting jockstrap of dumbassness shows up, not holding my breath. Huntsman's the only one thats remotely close and we all know you can't elect the mormon.
 
2011-10-23 03:00:38 PM
So, I'm taking the over-under as to how soon Libya adopts Sharia Law.

I give them 6 weeks.
 
Displayed 50 of 118 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »