If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Bloomberg) Amusing Fat Replacing Crude Oil as F-16 Fuel   (bloomberg.com) divider line 49
More: Amusing, F-16s, Fat Replacing, solar farms, Honeywell, renewable sources, liquid fuels, attack aircraft, Apache Helicopter  
•       •       •

4580 clicks; posted to Main » on 18 Oct 2011 at 1:21 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



49 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest
 
2011-10-18 12:55:26 PM
Followed this story about a year ago.

Was going to post teh "old news is so exciting" guy but noticed that this story is dated today.

Weird.
 
2011-10-18 01:23:45 PM
How much bacon will it take to fuel an F-16 and what will that do to bacon prices?
 
2011-10-18 01:25:10 PM
I was going to make a tasteless joke about how it's just increasing efficiency since the military can now use infantry as fuel in addition to cannon fodder, but thought that might be a little over the line. Ah well, here I am anyway.

/aisle seat please
 
2011-10-18 01:25:11 PM
I wish the green movement did a much better job of casting "green energy" as "made in America energy" that had benefits like "keeping American cash in the domestic economy" and "providing national security benefits". Because it definitely does. The Germans were trying all kinds of crazy shiat to get oil by the end of the WWII. We could someday be in the same boat if our ability to protect the sealanes and oil tankers fails.

Additionally it means we can hand the entire Middle East to China and go "Here, your problem now if you want oil. Have fun policing it", make some popcorn, and watch shiat go down on CNN.
 
2011-10-18 01:25:46 PM
No need to use valuable bacon. Draft the obese and mandate liposuction until they're ready to serve. Use the results to fuel the planes. Win-Win.
 
2011-10-18 01:28:00 PM
Well, at least our military capabilities won't diminish.

FAT USA! FAT USA!
 
2011-10-18 01:28:05 PM
New diet plan for the midwest? Liposuction it out and use it as fuel, that would keep the military well equipped with all the fuel they'll ever need.
 
2011-10-18 01:29:18 PM
JohnAnnArbor: No need to use valuable bacon. Draft the obese and mandate liposuction until they're ready to serve. Use the results to fuel the planes. Win-Win.

Michigan just became a recruitment hotbed with your strategy. Detroit is like the new strategic fuel reserve.

/the fryer oil from all the chicken places down there could likely have kept all of SAC flying for a year during the Cold War
 
2011-10-18 01:30:48 PM
Now we need to invade the south for their precious fat, er I mean freedom!
 
2011-10-18 01:31:13 PM
Pizza the Hutt seen fueling the death star.
 
2011-10-18 01:32:30 PM
because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used
 
2011-10-18 01:34:03 PM
haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?
 
2011-10-18 01:34:11 PM
img504.imageshack.us
 
2011-10-18 01:35:10 PM
Finally, the military can now accept the majority (IE, overweight) of Americans into the forces!

/just don't ask why they never come back from a mission
 
2011-10-18 01:35:36 PM
Being dependent on 3rd world countries for oil is as outdated as using leeches for headaches.

Bring troops home, bomb mid-east, ban islam, and use bio fuels. World solution solved.

-waves bye to all the muslims. eerrr terrorists. Who we kidding, they are both and the same. Bye!!-
 
2011-10-18 01:35:52 PM
sleep lack

Curse you, He-man!

/came to post an 'Approves' of porkins.
//Well played.
 
2011-10-18 01:36:47 PM
meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?


probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon
 
2011-10-18 01:36:54 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: I was going to make a tasteless joke about how it's just increasing efficiency since the military can now use infantry as fuel in addition to cannon fodder, but thought that might be a little over the line. Ah well, here I am anyway.

/aisle seat please


Yuri has taken over the Defense Department? Wait till they send out the Brutes
 
2011-10-18 01:40:52 PM
images.wikia.com

Next stop, BioReactors! Step right in commrade, those laser fences don't power themselves...
 
2011-10-18 01:42:02 PM
ha-ha-guy: JohnAnnArbor: No need to use valuable bacon. Draft the obese and mandate liposuction until they're ready to serve. Use the results to fuel the planes. Win-Win.

Michigan just became a recruitment hotbed with your strategy. Detroit is like the new strategic fuel reserve.

/the fryer oil from all the chicken places down there could likely have kept all of SAC flying for a year during the Cold War


Detroit may be jam-packed with fatties, but trust me on this. The deep south is where we want to be getting that jet fuel. Mississippi alone could fuel a mid-sized foreign war.
 
2011-10-18 01:44:13 PM
HMS_Blinkin: ha-ha-guy: JohnAnnArbor: No need to use valuable bacon. Draft the obese and mandate liposuction until they're ready to serve. Use the results to fuel the planes. Win-Win.

Michigan just became a recruitment hotbed with your strategy. Detroit is like the new strategic fuel reserve.

/the fryer oil from all the chicken places down there could likely have kept all of SAC flying for a year during the Cold War

Detroit may be jam-packed with fatties, but trust me on this. The deep south is where we want to be getting that jet fuel. Mississippi alone could fuel a mid-sized foreign war.


Notice how the Chinese are getting fatter? It's going to stop an arms race and until we have a Taco Bell in every school, we won't be safe!
 
2011-10-18 01:44:49 PM
I love the smell of Bacon in the morning... it smells like... freedom
 
2011-10-18 01:46:18 PM
I'm eating this Twinkie to protect the homeland.
 
2011-10-18 01:46:21 PM
Can we jack a tube right into people's guts? A coast to coast flight could solve obesity problems for everyone in coach.
 
2011-10-18 01:46:23 PM
Fano: Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: I was going to make a tasteless joke about how it's just increasing efficiency since the military can now use infantry as fuel in addition to cannon fodder, but thought that might be a little over the line. Ah well, here I am anyway.

/aisle seat please

Yuri has taken over the Defense Department? Wait till they send out the Brutes


Or we could just build a cloning vat for US citizens, then use the clones for fuel!
media.moddb.com
/love all these C&C references.
 
2011-10-18 01:54:30 PM
featurecreep: Can we jack a tube right into people's guts? A coast to coast flight could solve obesity problems for everyone in coach.

And the fatties wouldn't need seatbelt extenders on the return trip!
 
2011-10-18 01:58:23 PM
So, Subby's mom could fuel an entire aircraft carrier?
 
2011-10-18 02:01:51 PM
haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?

probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon


That's not what I asked.

Are refineries in the Middle East providing us with jet fuel, or is it shipped from elsewhere?
 
2011-10-18 02:07:12 PM
(new window)


out dated but interesting
 
2011-10-18 02:08:45 PM
So, when do the Calorie Men take over?

/needs a kink-spring scooter.
//Will settle for a windup.
 
2011-10-18 02:12:51 PM
With our increasing obesity rate, it looks like our F-16's will never run out of fuel.
 
2011-10-18 02:15:07 PM
meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?

probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon

That's not what I asked.

Are refineries in the Middle East providing us with jet fuel, or is it shipped from elsewhere?


you've had time to read the link on my last post, i would like your opinion
 
2011-10-18 02:29:17 PM
haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?

probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon

That's not what I asked.

Are refineries in the Middle East providing us with jet fuel, or is it shipped from elsewhere?

you've had time to read the link on my last post, i would like your opinion


Comparing the limited theater of operations of Desert Shield/Desert Storm to a much wider range of ops between Iraq, Afghanistan, et. al. is not a fair comparison. One war (the 1st Gulf War) compared to two + other conflicts, and we had a doubling of fuel consumption. I'm not exactly shocked.

And I tried comparing numbers, but the article kept comparing gallons and barrels of fuel with gallons and barrels of oil. A barrel of crude does not all turn into fuel.

That said, the military has some very clear reasons to find a viable alternative to oil for fueling it's machines.
 
2011-10-18 02:32:47 PM
meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?

probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon

That's not what I asked.

Are refineries in the Middle East providing us with jet fuel, or is it shipped from elsewhere?

you've had time to read the link on my last post, i would like your opinion

Comparing the limited theater of operations of Desert Shield/Desert Storm to a much wider range of ops between Iraq, Afghanistan, et. al. is not a fair comparison. One war (the 1st Gulf War) compared to two + other conflicts, and we had a doubling of fuel consumption. I'm not exactly shocked.

And I tried comparing numbers, but the article kept comparing gallons and barrels of fuel with gallons and barrels of oil. A barrel of crude does not all turn into fuel.

That said, the military has some very clear reasons to find a viable alternative to oil for fueling it's machines.


so you think it would be practical to ship those amounts over there
 
2011-10-18 02:34:12 PM
From TFA: The U.S. Air Force is set to certify all of its 40-plus aircraft models to burn fuels derived from waste oils and plants by 2013

Bloomberg is really playing up the waste FOG (fats/oils/grease) angle but the hard cold fact is that there isn't anywhere near enough of that stuff to fuel the military.

So an even bigger percentage of our agricultural output will be diverted for non-food uses. That's probably not a smart move for the long term, seeing as how planet Earth just got its 7th billion person, stocks of phosphorous for fertilizer are being depleted worldwide, and the scientists are saying that human caused global warming is gradually going to screw up our ability to grow...well... ANYTHING.

I fully realize that there's as yet no alternative to hydrocarbons as fuel for aircraft-- especially high performance military aircraft. That said, switching from fossil to farm-grown biofuels is a bad idea in the long term-- even though it's a renewable fuel that is (in theory) carbon-neutral.

"Reliance on fossil fuels is simply too much of a vulnerability for a military organization to have," U.S. Navy Secretary Raymond Mabus said in an interview.

Probably the best overall long-term way to reduce vulnerability in the long term would be to cut the military budget in half or more and spend the difference on carefully working out sustainable and cost-effective ways to drastically reduce poverty/hunger/illiteracy in the crappy parts of the world. And do more far more aggressive research into fusion energy and making better batteries (or maybe supercapacitors.)

Hell, the only thing we REALLY need a military for is to protect us from a collapsing Mexico-- and maybe a few dozen MIRV-tipped ICBMs to make sure the rest of the world would think twice before seriously farking with us.
 
2011-10-18 02:47:07 PM
jaymanchu: New diet plan for the midwest? Liposuction it out and use it as fuel, that would keep the military well equipped with all the fuel they'll ever need.

Where do I sign up?
 
2011-10-18 02:52:51 PM
haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: meat0918: haywatchthis: because there is an abundance of bio fuel in the middle east, where the fighter jets are used

How many refineries in the middle east are providing us with jet fuel?

probably shell, bp, chevron, or exxon

That's not what I asked.

Are refineries in the Middle East providing us with jet fuel, or is it shipped from elsewhere?

you've had time to read the link on my last post, i would like your opinion

Comparing the limited theater of operations of Desert Shield/Desert Storm to a much wider range of ops between Iraq, Afghanistan, et. al. is not a fair comparison. One war (the 1st Gulf War) compared to two + other conflicts, and we had a doubling of fuel consumption. I'm not exactly shocked.

And I tried comparing numbers, but the article kept comparing gallons and barrels of fuel with gallons and barrels of oil. A barrel of crude does not all turn into fuel.

That said, the military has some very clear reasons to find a viable alternative to oil for fueling it's machines.

so you think it would be practical to ship those amounts over there


The question cannot be answered without knowing how much a gallon of straight jet fuel costs compared to the cost of shipping this mixture.

Riche: Probably the best overall long-term way to reduce vulnerability in the long term would be to cut the military budget in half or more and spend the difference on carefully working out sustainable and cost-effective ways to drastically reduce poverty/hunger/illiteracy in the crappy parts of the world.

Yeah, that would work. Hell, even spending it here would help our national security, according to these guys over at the Pentagon
 
2011-10-18 03:45:04 PM
bikerbob59: So, Subby's mom could fuel an entire aircraft carrier?

Well we know she can *service* an entire aircraft carrier!
 
2011-10-18 04:10:31 PM
Wow, if we liposuction Rosie O'Donnell, we could run the entire fleet for a week.
 
2011-10-18 04:13:03 PM
Hopefully the Armed Forces as a large, dependable market does something to spur biofuels along just like guidance system needs for missles did for microprocessors in the 1950's.
 
2011-10-18 04:59:21 PM
I heard America has about 17025 MegaTons of reserves of fat in its population just waiting for liposuccion and a gas pump for those F16s. That's about the 10 months production of oil from Egypt.
 
2011-10-18 05:59:06 PM
LOL. So much for Herman Cain's buddy J.C. Bell. Looks like the ole' redneck got shut out.
 
2011-10-18 07:01:26 PM
Schadenfreude ist die schoenste Freude: I was going to make a tasteless joke about how it's just increasing efficiency since the military can now use infantry as fuel in addition to cannon fodder, but thought that might be a little over the line. Ah well, here I am anyway.

wiki.uqm.stack.nl
Approves

/Hot like the furnace
 
2011-10-18 07:33:24 PM
Riche: From TFA: The U.S. Air Force is set to certify all of its 40-plus aircraft models to burn fuels derived from waste oils and plants by 2013

Bloomberg is really playing up the waste FOG (fats/oils/grease) angle but the hard cold fact is that there isn't anywhere near enough of that stuff to fuel the military.

So an even bigger percentage of our agricultural output will be diverted for non-food uses. That's probably not a smart move for the long term, seeing as how planet Earth just got its 7th billion person, stocks of phosphorous for fertilizer are being depleted worldwide, and the scientists are saying that human caused global warming is gradually going to screw up our ability to grow...well... ANYTHING.

I fully realize that there's as yet no alternative to hydrocarbons as fuel for aircraft-- especially high performance military aircraft. That said, switching from fossil to farm-grown biofuels is a bad idea in the long term-- even though it's a renewable fuel that is (in theory) carbon-neutral.

"Reliance on fossil fuels is simply too much of a vulnerability for a military organization to have," U.S. Navy Secretary Raymond Mabus said in an interview.

Probably the best overall long-term way to reduce vulnerability in the long term would be to cut the military budget in half or more and spend the difference on carefully working out sustainable and cost-effective ways to drastically reduce poverty/hunger/illiteracy in the crappy parts of the world. And do more far more aggressive research into fusion energy and making better batteries (or maybe supercapacitors.)

Hell, the only thing we REALLY need a military for is to protect us from a collapsing Mexico-- and maybe a few dozen MIRV-tipped ICBMs to make sure the rest of the world would think twice before seriously farking with us.


When you mentioned super-capacitors, you crossed over into "douche".
 
2011-10-18 07:59:52 PM
MemeSlave:

When you mentioned super-capacitors, you crossed over into "douche".


Sorry, I wasn't aware the line was drawn at that rhetorical place.

What was it about mentioning that bit of tech that got your panties in such a wad? Was it my lack of an EE degree? The missing hyphen when I typed the word? A traumatic childhood experience with capacitors?
 
2011-10-18 09:31:38 PM
Yo' Momma so fat she recognized as a vital strategic resource.
 
2011-10-18 09:33:09 PM
Here's an old one I came up with as a child: Yo' Momma so fat that in a green dress she looks like Vermont.
 
2011-10-18 11:32:27 PM
funny, considering the amount of Pork that funded the F-16
 
2011-10-19 09:22:29 AM
ha-ha-guy: I wish the green movement did a much better job of casting "green energy" as "made in America energy" that had benefits like "keeping American cash in the domestic economy" and "providing national security benefits". Because it definitely does. The Germans were trying all kinds of crazy shiat to get oil by the end of the WWII. We could someday be in the same boat if our ability to protect the sealanes and oil tankers fails.

Additionally it means we can hand the entire Middle East to China and go "Here, your problem now if you want oil. Have fun policing it", make some popcorn, and watch shiat go down on CNN.


Your newsletter, send me a copy.
 
Displayed 49 of 49 comments

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »