If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Politico) Obvious Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frank. Antonym: Obama administration   (politico.com) divider line 162
More: Obvious, Judicial Watch, D.C. Circuit, transparency, United States District Court, Freedom of Information Act, secret service  
•       •       •

2499 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Oct 2011 at 1:20 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



162 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-10-15 10:47:53 AM
Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent? When I was born, it was the tail end of Carter, and I was too young to remember Reagan but it seems to me they've been pretty much like this all of my life.
 
2011-10-15 10:54:04 AM
FTFA: The position taken by the Obama Justice Department, namely that White House visitor records are presidential records and not agency records, is essentially the same one that the department took under President George W. Bush

/did that set off your outrage too, subby?
//not saying it's right, but it's certainly nothing new
 
2011-10-15 10:55:08 AM
Question: From what I know, White House logs maintained by the Secret Service have personal information in them, including Social Security numbers. Are these redacted when this information is handed over, or is highly personal information handed over without restriction to Congress, a body not known for respect of personal information and high security levels?
 
2011-10-15 11:21:10 AM
nekom: Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent? When I was born, it was the tail end of Carter, and I was too young to remember Reagan but it seems to me they've been pretty much like this all of my life.

None of them have been transparent, but then again they didn't say they were going to be transparent.

/been voting since Reagan and this administration has been more transparent than most, IMO
 
2011-10-15 11:38:30 AM
Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frank. Antonym: Obama EVERY administration

FTFY subtard
 
2011-10-15 11:40:29 AM
Any person who aspires to hold a political office will say anything it takes to get there and then do whatever it takes to stay there.
 
2011-10-15 12:08:44 PM
Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frankness

FTFY.
 
2011-10-15 12:09:39 PM
HeadKase: Any person who aspires to hold a political office will say anything it takes to get there and then do whatever it takes to stay there.

Unfortunately this seems to be true.
 
2011-10-15 12:14:34 PM
HeadKase: Any person who aspires to hold a political office will say anything it takes to get there and then do whatever it takes to stay there.

QFT
 
2011-10-15 12:15:54 PM
That's racist!

You only vote opaque?
 
2011-10-15 12:17:15 PM
FireBreathingLiberal: That's racist!

You only vote opaque?


"WE'RE HERE, WE'RE CLEAR, GET USE TO IT!!"
 
2011-10-15 12:30:07 PM
i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.
 
2011-10-15 12:43:30 PM
AlwaysRightBoy: None of them have been transparent, but then again they didn't say they were going to be transparent.

/been voting since Reagan and this administration has been more transparent than most, IMO


I think it's more of a `nature of the beast' thing than it is a criticism of any particular administration.
 
2011-10-15 12:48:16 PM
GAT_00: Question: From what I know, White House logs maintained by the Secret Service have personal information in them, including Social Security numbers. Are these redacted when this information is handed over, or is highly personal information handed over without restriction to Congress, a body not known for respect of personal information and high security levels?

They would have to be redacted or else it would be a breach of Personally Identifiable Information (PII) which is an even larger headache in some cases than handling FOIA requests. After the VA lost that laptop containing many thousands of SSNs and other types of sensitive PII, a law was passed that requires extremely stiff reporting deadlines for breaches of PII.

If the record is 100% PII, there is an exception category to FOIA requests that (might) exempt it from release under FOIA. Note that there is no guaranteed exemption when it comes to FOIA, and to be exempt a request must be for information falling under one of nine specifically defined categories. Some are very blunt in what is exempt such as classified national security information or the geographical location of wells. See here (new window) for list and details of FOIA exemptions. I don't care to get into a discussion over which exemption may apply in this case, but most of them can be ruled out immediately.
 
2011-10-15 01:06:07 PM
i.imgur.com
Dr. Forrester: Knuckleheads... I'll have you know that Frank is not transparent. In fact, if you look to my left, he's right... uh...

i.imgur.com
Dr. Forrester: FRANK!

i.imgur.com
TV's Frank: I'm right here, Dr. F. Sorry. I was just in the bathroom.
Dr. Forrester: Gaaah! Frank, don't do that.

i.imgur.com
Dr. Forrester: Anyway, Frank's little indiscretion aside, I think you'll really enjoy today's little experiment as much as I did. Do you like terror? Do you like repetition? Do you like watching arguments that go on forever and never get anywhere? Then stay tuned for this presentation of... The Fark Politics Tab.

i.imgur.com
 
2011-10-15 01:17:34 PM
nekom: Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent? When I was born, it was the tail end of Carter, and I was too young to remember Reagan but it seems to me they've been pretty much like this all of my life.

wouldnt it be easy to release the logs for the last 20-40 years?
If Obama is being forced to release last years records, the correct thing to do is release ALL records.

why the fark would you do one without the other??
 
2011-10-15 01:23:39 PM
nekom: Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent? When I was born, it was the tail end of Carter, and I was too young to remember Reagan but it seems to me they've been pretty much like this all of my life. blah blah both sides are bad blah blah vote Republican
 
2011-10-15 01:26:52 PM
FlashHarry: i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

1-20-09 changed everything! Never forget!

I'm actually unclear as to why they want the logs, but I'm guessing they are to.
 
2011-10-15 01:28:38 PM
FlashHarry: i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

That's my problem with this. I'm willing to admit that things still aren't as transparent as they should. But unless they were as outraged about this in 2006 as they are in 2011, then they're just being partisan shills because a Demmycrat did it.
 
2011-10-15 01:29:57 PM
Lionel Mandrake: Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frank. Antonym: Obama EVERY administration

FTFY subtard


I don't remember Bush running on a platform of Open and Transparent. I can't remember Clinton doing that either. I could be wrong, can you source?
 
2011-10-15 01:31:08 PM
nekom: AlwaysRightBoy: None of them have been transparent, but then again they didn't say they were going to be transparent.

/been voting since Reagan and this administration has been more transparent than most, IMO

I think it's more of a `nature of the beast' thing than it is a criticism of any particular administration.


You would be correct. It's a fine line every administration hast to walk.
/for many, many reasons
 
2011-10-15 01:31:09 PM
FlashHarry: i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

www.reactionface.info
 
2011-10-15 01:33:05 PM
MyRandomName: Lionel Mandrake: Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frank. Antonym: Obama EVERY administration

FTFY subtard

I don't remember Bush running on a platform of Open and Transparent. I can't remember Clinton doing that either. I could be wrong, can you source?


OK, let's broaden it: all administrations make promises they break.

Does that ring a bell? Or does only that one promise count?
 
2011-10-15 01:33:12 PM
67.18.219.83

/ what a wonderful afternoon for butthurt
// politicians from both parties using the same lame tactics? COLOR ME SHOCKED
 
2011-10-15 01:35:05 PM
veedeevadeevoodee: [67.18.219.83 image 240x111]

/ what a wonderful afternoon for butthurt
// politicians from both parties using the same lame tactics? COLOR ME SHOCKED


I'm missing something...where's the butthurt?
 
2011-10-15 01:37:30 PM
Lionel Mandrake: FireBreathingLiberal: That's racist!

You only vote opaque?

"WE'RE HERE, WE'RE CLEAR, GET USE TO IT!!"


Win.
 
2011-10-15 01:37:35 PM
Bush did it. That makes it OK. That's what Hope & Change mean.
 
2011-10-15 01:38:42 PM
Lionel Mandrake: I'm missing something...where's the butthurt?

I mean, other than your whiny graphic
 
2011-10-15 01:41:17 PM
Big farking deal. Does anyone besides right-wingers looking for more reasons to hate Obama really give two shiats about this? How about doing something to help fix the country besides trying to blame everything on Obama, you assholes?
 
2011-10-15 01:45:11 PM
MyRandomName: Lionel Mandrake: Transparency: transˈpe(ə)rənsē noun: 1.free from pretense or deceit. synonym: Frank. Antonym: Obama EVERY administration

FTFY subtard

I don't remember Bush running on a platform of Open and Transparent. I can't remember Clinton doing that either. I could be wrong, can you source?


This has already been accomplished (new window) and is just one of the great many accomplishments of this administration.

You can find piles of Federal Government information at Data.Gov (new window), noneof which was available prior to this implementation. If there is any Federal Agency which does not have an obvious "Open Government" section on their website, you can report this discrepancy on Data.Gov's Contact Page (new window).

Please note that there are still exemptions to the FOIA request process and that not all Federal Government information is appropriate for release to the public. In fact, if you would like to read up on future information policy, check out Controlled Unclassified Information (new window) which may be implemented in the next three or four years. It is a revamp of Sensitive But Unclassified categorizations initiated by President Bush for the protection of Unclassified information that cannot be released to the general public. Remember, Unclassified does not mean approved for public release.
 
2011-10-15 01:46:02 PM
dudemanbro: Big farking deal. Does anyone besides right-wingers looking for more reasons to hate Obama really give two shiats about this? How about doing something to help fix the country besides trying to blame everything on Obama, you assholes?

Big f*cking deal? Dude, are you trying to minimize the horrors that SEIU is inflicting on the American public?

The horrors that were planned by the Obama Administration during the secret meetings that they are now trying to hide.
 
2011-10-15 01:46:23 PM
FlashHarry: i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

I love how you guys were concerned about transparency, the debt, the patriot act, Cheneys assassination squads, lobbyists, crony capitalism, up until now.....asshole.
 
2011-10-15 01:50:40 PM
The problem with the headline is: Which Obama scandal are we talking about? Solyadndra? Fast and Furious? LightSquared? Tonapah Solar?

Or is it committing combat troops to Uganda without congressional approval?
 
2011-10-15 01:52:51 PM
nekom Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent?


You have a point.

But in case you forgot, Obama promised that this would be 'the most transparent administration in history'. Similarly, the Clintons promised that their co-presidency would be 'the most ethical in history'.

Whoops.


/can't blame Bush
 
2011-10-15 01:53:38 PM
Lionel Mandrake:

I'm missing something...where's the butthurt?

FlashHarry:

i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

/ you must have him ignored
 
2011-10-15 01:53:56 PM
I bet Obama is regretting his nomination of that activist judge now....
 
2011-10-15 01:54:27 PM
LawrencePerson: The problem with the headline is: Which Obama scandal are we talking about? Solyadndra? Fast and Furious? LightSquared? Tonapah Solar?

Or is it committing combat troops to Uganda without congressional approval?


100 pct sure he has completely fulfilled the requirements of the War Powers Act.

I wouldn't disagree with the notion that we need to revisit that act though.
 
2011-10-15 01:54:41 PM
Sgt Stubby: But in case you forgot, Obama promised that this would be 'the most transparent administration in history'.

That could still be possible, yes?

I mean, it is a state of varying degree and not an on/off type thing.
 
2011-10-15 01:55:38 PM
Sgt Stubby: nekom Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent?


You have a point.

But in case you forgot, Obama promised that this would be 'the most transparent administration in history'. Similarly, the Clintons promised that their co-presidency would be 'the most ethical in history'.

Whoops.


/can't blame Bush


Words, what do they mean?
 
2011-10-15 01:59:52 PM
AlwaysRightBoy: None of them have been transparent, but then again they didn't say they were going to be transparent.

Stop protecting them. Stop making excuses for them. And stop saying it was all right because they didn't say they were going to change.

/And stop saying "I never said that", because you just did.
 
2011-10-15 02:00:23 PM
Sgt Stubby: nekom Can anyone name the last administration you'd say was transparent?


You have a point.

But in case you forgot, Obama promised that this would be 'the most transparent administration in history'. Similarly, the Clintons promised that their co-presidency would be 'the most ethical in history'.

Whoops.


/can't blame Bush


I can play too, Regan was elected on a platform to balance the budget (he tripled it) and Bush II said that he would use a humble foreign policy and end our policy of nation building.

Seriously, this could go on all day.
 
2011-10-15 02:03:10 PM
B.b.b.b.b.b.b.b. but ... BIRTH CERTIFICATE!!!ONE!!111!!
 
2011-10-15 02:04:19 PM
IlGreven: AlwaysRightBoy: None of them have been transparent, but then again they didn't say they were going to be transparent.

Stop protecting them. Stop making excuses for them. And stop saying it was all right because they didn't say they were going to change.

/And stop saying "I never said that", because you just did.


I said wat?
 
2011-10-15 02:05:14 PM
MFAWG: Words, what do they mean?


'The most transparent administration in history' is a sentence fragment composed of words. I think that just about anyone who speaks and understands English knows what that phrase means (or implies, promises, etc.). What do those words mean to you?
 
2011-10-15 02:06:05 PM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: FTFA: The position taken by the Obama Justice Department, namely that White House visitor records are presidential records and not agency records, is essentially the same one that the department took under President George W. Bush

/did that set off your outrage too, subby?
//not saying it's right, but it's certainly nothing new


and probably Clinton before that and Bush before that and ect before that....
 
2011-10-15 02:06:26 PM
But its ok because Cheney!
 
2011-10-15 02:06:46 PM
img2.newser.com (new window)

 

/meanwhile ........ so forth and so on
 
2011-10-15 02:07:36 PM
Before Obama became president: we should vote him because things need to be different than pasty adminsitrations.
After Obama became president: Hey, its ok if he does it, other adminsitrations did.

I support obama but I see no reason to defend him on this.
 
2011-10-15 02:11:42 PM
veedeevadeevoodee: Lionel Mandrake:

I'm missing something...where's the butthurt?

FlashHarry:

i love how you mouth breathing wingnuts are only just concerned about transparency now. just like you're only just concerned about the deficit now. assholes.

/ you must have him ignored


You perceive one guy as upset, so you paint the thread butthurt? OOOOOOOOOOKAAAAAY

Next time, try to focus a bit more, k?
 
2011-10-15 02:14:41 PM
Meatzilla: [img2.newser.com image 440x280] (new window)

 

/meanwhile ........ so forth and so on


As usual, your informative and hilarious graphic had turned me to your side. And on top of it, you provided links showing that Obama is acting like every President before him, and likely every one after him.

You are just so damn awesome.
 
Displayed 50 of 162 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »