If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Little Green Footballs) Sick House Republicans love pregnant women and they love babies, so that is why they are trying to pass a bill that would allow hospitals to refuse abortions to pregnant women, even if the woman miscarried and will die without one   (littlegreenfootballs.com) divider line 255
More: Sick, Jackie Speier, abortions, misogynists, baby  
•       •       •

2609 clicks; posted to Politics » on 13 Oct 2011 at 5:14 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



255 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-10-13 05:07:39 PM
Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?
 
2011-10-13 05:10:29 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

No, you're just a RINO. Welcome to the democratic party.
 
2011-10-13 05:10:47 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

No. But you guys are too quiet.
 
2011-10-13 05:11:37 PM
Here is the latest version of bill I could find (new window). I'm not finding anything relevant to the complaint except this, which would seem to make specific allocation for the situation described by the bill's detractors:

i.imgur.com

Perhaps the bill has been amended since then or I've missed something, but I'm just not seeing what the detractors are seeing. And I'm a pro-choice kinda guy. I'm all for removing abortion restrictions but I think one has to be clear on what's going on.
 
2011-10-13 05:12:25 PM
GOP: Government small enough to fit in your vagina!
 
2011-10-13 05:12:43 PM
Aren't women only good for being broodmares to the conservative fundies?

So, if the broodmare can't survive a childbirth, what good is it?

This is a perfectly logical bill for conservative fundies to support.
 
2011-10-13 05:15:31 PM
Anybody here surprised by this?
 
2011-10-13 05:16:34 PM
Thus reuniting baby with mommy. What's the problem here?
 
2011-10-13 05:16:43 PM
Small, hands-off government for business.

Huge, oppressive government for everyone else.
 
2011-10-13 05:17:08 PM
s2s2s2: Thus reuniting baby with mommy. What's the problem here?

Who will breast feed this child in heaven?
 
2011-10-13 05:17:48 PM
Rev.K: Small, hands-off government for business.

Huge, oppressive government for everyone else.


Why are you posting the entire Republican platform in here?
 
2011-10-13 05:17:55 PM
My uterus, my business. I don't tell you what to do with your testicles, do I? I could probably crash the server posting why I support a woman's right to choose and how it personally affects me and one other person I know, but no one here needs to be bothered with that. Suffice to say though, I think the idea of the government controlling what I do with my reproductive organs is sickening.
 
2011-10-13 05:18:24 PM
Any religious people care to comment on whether fetuses are tainted by original sin? I'm starting to think that conservatives only like life before it's born. After that, we deserve what's coming to us because we're all dirty, sinful... uh, sinners.
 
2011-10-13 05:18:38 PM
FTA: Let no one ever say that the Republican Party is trying to hide their true agenda, and it's not "creating jobs."

Sure this bill creates jobs...


....for coroners and morticians.
 
2011-10-13 05:18:55 PM
Somacandra: Perhaps the bill has been amended since then or I've missed something, but I'm just not seeing what the detractors are seeing. And I'm a pro-choice kinda guy. I'm all for removing abortion restrictions but I think one has to be clear on what's going on.

This is the relevant part:

i219.photobucket.com

It's meant to exempt any hospital or doctor who refuses to provide abortion care from rules that require them to act to save the patient in emergency situations.
 
2011-10-13 05:19:21 PM
Somacandra 2011-10-13 05:11:37 PM Here is the latest version of bill I could find (new window). I'm not finding anything relevant to the complaint except this, which would seem to make specific allocation for the situation described by the bill's detractors:
================================================================

Note: In politics, if something sounds hyperbolic... it probably is!

On both sides.

/The complaint isn't about funding though. So that's not the part you want.
 
2011-10-13 05:19:48 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

NO. There's this guy:

tosh.mtvnimages.com

Maybe better recognized here:

cache.gawkerassets.com
 
2011-10-13 05:20:31 PM
This will create jobs how, exactly?
 
2011-10-13 05:20:52 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

Nope, and I'm not a RINO, I've been a Republican since before Rick Perry was out shilling for Gore.

Republicans are supposed to be the hands off party while the Democrats are the meddle with everything party. Now the majority of Republicans and all the Democrats want to meddle with everything.
 
2011-10-13 05:21:03 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

No.
 
2011-10-13 05:21:25 PM
Aren't all abortions performed on pregnant women?
 
2011-10-13 05:22:08 PM
img510.imageshack.us

Talk about two birds! Looks like I will be going to the game this weekend, boys!
 
2011-10-13 05:23:00 PM
Barbigazi: Who will breast feed this child in heaven?

El Shaddai of course.

(new window)
 
2011-10-13 05:23:06 PM
GOD'S WILL.

Also known as, "sucks to be a woman in that predicament."
 
2011-10-13 05:23:44 PM
Genevieve Marie: Somacandra: Perhaps the bill has been amended since then or I've missed something, but I'm just not seeing what the detractors are seeing. And I'm a pro-choice kinda guy. I'm all for removing abortion restrictions but I think one has to be clear on what's going on.

This is the relevant part:

[i219.photobucket.com image 640x155]

It's meant to exempt any hospital or doctor who refuses to provide abortion care from rules that require them to act to save the patient in emergency situations.


Yep, unfortunately, this.

Basically, a woman could be rushed to a hospital by her spouse/SO/friend because a compromised uterus is causing her to bleed out, and if the only way to save her is to abort the fetus and stop the bleeding, the hospital could flat refuse to treat her. Bonus: They'd also be under no obligation to transport her, or give her information on how to get to a facility that will treat her!
 
2011-10-13 05:24:10 PM
clovis69: jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

Nope, and I'm not a RINO, I've been a Republican since before Rick Perry was out shilling for Gore.

Republicans are supposed to be the hands off party while the Democrats are the meddle with everything party. Now the majority of Republicans and all the Democrats want to meddle with everything.


No offense, but besides trying to start some semblance of a first world national health care system (that in this half assed scenario requires an individual mandate), what "hands on meddling" have the Democrats been advocating lately?
 
2011-10-13 05:24:25 PM
"Life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself."

I have no idea what this means or how it would be applied to, say, a woman diagnosed with brain cancer mid-pregnancy. Regardless, I'm sure this bill will create many jobs.
 
2011-10-13 05:25:04 PM
KarmicDisaster: Aren't all abortions performed on pregnant women?

No
 
2011-10-13 05:26:02 PM
s2s2s2: KarmicDisaster: Aren't all abortions performed on pregnant women?

No


Tries again.

http://www-deadline-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/spiderman m usical.jpg
 
2011-10-13 05:26:35 PM
s2s2s2: KarmicDisaster: Aren't all abortions performed on pregnant women?

No


In fact, most of them are performed on children. Some of them are just performed on innate lumps of organic tissue.
 
2011-10-13 05:26:42 PM
www-deadline-com.vimg.net


/Sigh
 
2011-10-13 05:26:53 PM
The R's know this bill will never, ever be signed into law. They're banking on it. They would never actually want the bill to pass because of the political fallout, but by introducing the legislation they can tell their fundie supporters that they are trying. They are trying to prove their conservatism. That's all. I think it goes without saying that President Obama would veto it and there would be absolutely no chance of an override.
 
2011-10-13 05:27:13 PM
Coco LaFemme: My uterus, my business. I don't tell you what to do with your testicles, do I? I could probably crash the server posting why I support a woman's right to choose and how it personally affects me and one other person I know, but no one here needs to be bothered with that. Suffice to say though, I think the idea of the government controlling what I do with my reproductive organs is sickening.

To be fair, at least some of them view it not as what you're doing with your reproductive organs, but what you're doing with someone else's organs that happen to be inside you.

/ Devil's advocate
 
2011-10-13 05:27:18 PM
Lando Lincoln: GOD'S WILL.

Also known as, "sucks to be a woman in that predicament."


Gods last will and testament.

what sucks is that 70% of real Americans know that the main type of guy that doesn't take responsibility for their knock ups are Republicans.
 
2011-10-13 05:27:25 PM
Grand_Moff_Joseph: Basically, a woman could be rushed to a hospital by her spouse/SO/friend because a compromised uterus is causing her to bleed out, and if the only way to save her is to abort the fetus and stop the bleeding, the hospital could flat refuse to treat her. Bonus: They'd also be under no obligation to transport her, or give her information on how to get to a facility that will treat her!

I wonder how many times this will happen before a grief-stricken spouse just goes postal.
 
2011-10-13 05:27:41 PM
s2s2s2: Barbigazi: Who will breast feed this child in heaven?

El Shaddai of course.

(new window)


There you have it. Aborted babies become Muslim unless you kill the mom too.

What now libs? WHAT THE F*CK NOW?
 
2011-10-13 05:27:44 PM
i'm not a doctor, but... if you miscarried, then wouldn't an abortion be a bit superfluous?
 
2011-10-13 05:29:06 PM
Barbigazi: There you have it. Aborted babies become Muslim unless you kill the mom too

Where do you think the sets of 72 virgins come from?

We can't keep making virgins for the turrists.
 
2011-10-13 05:30:05 PM
It's called protecting life, libs. Sure, sometimes lives have to be lost to save others, but we must always stop the murder of abortion. If a woman dies in childbirth, so be it.

Look at it this way, libs. If we disallowed all abortions, there would be more welfarites sucking on the government teat. Thus, there would be more Democraps in the world. Don't you want more Democraps voting Democrap? That's what I thought, lib.
 
2011-10-13 05:30:50 PM
someonelse: "Life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself."

I have no idea what this means or how it would be applied to, say, a woman diagnosed with brain cancer mid-pregnancy. Regardless, I'm sure this bill will create many jobs.


That's another one of the problems with crap like this. It's left up to individual insurance companies to determine what they'll pay for under the law, and this law gives them a great excuse to deny all coverage on surgeries that include an abortion.

Does anyone really think that they'll go ahead and keep covering needed procedures when there's a great loophole that allows them to get out of paying?
 
2011-10-13 05:31:13 PM
clovis69: jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

Nope, and I'm not a RINO, I've been a Republican since before Rick Perry was out shilling for Gore.

Republicans are supposed to be the hands off party while the Democrats are the meddle with everything party. Now the majority of Republicans and all the Democrats want to meddle with everything.


See that's where I strongly disagree. I would flip it the other way.

For some reason, Republicans seem to think that economic freedom is the only freedom that matters. What about freedom to marry? Freedom to not have Christian symbols everywhere? Freedom to not say the Pledge of Allegiance? And on and on.

I really feel like Republicans are the ones who want to meddle with essentially everything except the rights of corporations, and Democrats want to meddle with everything except the rights of individuals.

(Yes, if you want to smoke, for example, it's your right, so long as you don't get it into someone else's air.)
 
2011-10-13 05:31:35 PM
colon_pow: i'm not a doctor, but... if you miscarried, then wouldn't an abortion be a bit superfluous?

It's the same procedure early on, pretty much regardless. A D&C is a D&C regardless of what the contents are.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002914.htm (new window)

/Had a miscarriage a few months before my son was conceived.
//Had to have a D&C.
///Thought that some doctors would rather leave dead babies in there is kinda gruesome.
 
2011-10-13 05:32:11 PM
jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

Well so far the GOP's main focus has been trying to stop abortion and gay rights. Including unfunded contraception programs like Planned Parenthood.

I am not sure why someone would belong to a party who's top priorities are things you are against.
 
2011-10-13 05:32:33 PM
This shiat makes me so upset. Having been in a "end the pregnancy before I die" situation once before, and knowing it could happen to me again, I just think the GOP wants me, and women like me, dead.

/they don't care that I'm happily 5 months pregnant now, either
//baby girl will be raised to be liberal & pro-choice
 
2011-10-13 05:33:31 PM
colon_pow: i'm not a doctor, but... if you miscarried, then wouldn't an abortion be a bit superfluous?

Not really. Sometimes the fetus can die in the womb and start to decay. It's rare, but it can happen.
 
2011-10-13 05:34:43 PM
colon_pow: i'm not a doctor, but... if you miscarried, then wouldn't an abortion be a bit superfluous?

Not all miscarriages are simple. Some of them are life-threatening and require removing the fetus, which isn't going to survive no matter what, to save the life of the mother.

In fact, there are tons of doctors that aren't being properly trained on how to do a D&C on a woman having a miscarriage, because that's the same procedure used during an abortion and medical students have to request and pay for separate training to learn how to do it.
 
2011-10-13 05:35:09 PM
i.imgur.com
 
2011-10-13 05:35:41 PM
Genevieve Marie: Somacandra: Perhaps the bill has been amended since then or I've missed something, but I'm just not seeing what the detractors are seeing. And I'm a pro-choice kinda guy. I'm all for removing abortion restrictions but I think one has to be clear on what's going on.

This is the relevant part:

[i219.photobucket.com image 640x155]

It's meant to exempt any hospital or doctor who refuses to provide abortion care from rules that require them to act to save the patient in emergency situations.


Just out of curiosity, could you point me to the "rules that require" doctors "to act to save" patients "in emergency situations"? You know, the ones that this legislation would "exempt" them from?

That's a serious question, and it illustrates how bill isn't about anything more than providing the conscience protections that the Obama administration said they didn't object to when they jettisoned the Bush-era conscience rules on the grounds that they were too broad (potentially extending to contraception, etc.).
 
2011-10-13 05:36:35 PM
clovis69: jehovahs witness protection: Am I the only conservative who believes in the right to have an abortion or marry any damn body you want?

Nope, and I'm not a RINO, I've been a Republican since before Rick Perry was out shilling for Gore.

Republicans are supposed to be the hands off party while the Democrats are the meddle with everything party. Now the majority of Republicans and all the Democrats want to meddle with everything.


That's some powerful stupid.
 
2011-10-13 05:36:53 PM
Genevieve Marie: In fact, there are tons of doctors that aren't being properly trained on how to do a D&C on a woman having a miscarriage, because that's the same procedure used during an abortion and medical students have to request and pay for separate training to learn how to do it.

As a nation, we really are becoming willfully ignorant to the point of self-destruction, aren't we.
 
Displayed 50 of 255 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »