If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Talking Points Memo) Cool Watch Mars Rover Opportunity's three-year-long journey in less than three minutes   (idealab.talkingpointsmemo.com) divider line 30
More: Cool, Mars Rover Opportunity, Mars rovers, Red Planet, Mars Rover Spirit, jet propulsions, The Atlantic Wire, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, accelerometers  
•       •       •

3659 clicks; posted to Geek » on 12 Oct 2011 at 5:19 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



30 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2011-10-11 11:54:23 PM
The Mars rovers were designed to last 90 days. They landed in 2004, and yet we still have one that works. To keep that timeframe in perspective, Opportunity started its work on Mars before the founding of Youtube.

marsrover.nasa.gov
 
2011-10-12 12:42:27 AM
That was far more interesting than watching the GOP Presidential debate in fast-forward, I'll tell you.
 
2011-10-12 05:43:42 AM
Wow, kind of looks like a lakebed, doesn't it?
 
2011-10-12 06:01:33 AM
img684.imageshack.us
 
2011-10-12 06:32:42 AM
Would have been better if the camera were pointed in the same farking direction each time. This is a just a fast black and white slideshow.
 
2011-10-12 06:44:56 AM
Prickly Pete: Would have been better if the camera were pointed in the same farking direction each time.

it is. watch the horizon and you can see the same mountain off in the distance in each pic. it's just that the wind is moving dust/dirt/sand so much that you see bare rock then dunes then bare rock the dunes etc...
 
2011-10-12 07:37:47 AM
Prickly Pete: Would have been better if the camera were pointed in the same farking direction each time. This is a just a fast black and white slideshow.

Someone pee in your cornflakes this morning?
 
2011-10-12 08:16:42 AM
oi53.tinypic.com (click for obligatory embiggening)
 
2011-10-12 08:41:10 AM
Where's the kaboom?

I was expecting an earth-shattering kaboom!
 
2011-10-12 08:45:09 AM
That cartoon....so damn sad! I hate when anthromorphosized objects affect my emotions!
 
2011-10-12 08:59:26 AM
croesius: That cartoon....so damn sad! I hate when anthromorphosized objects affect my emotions!

^^This.
 
2011-10-12 08:59:42 AM
The only plausible explanation for the rear-facing photographs is that NASA had evidence that aliens were following the rover.
 
2011-10-12 09:00:25 AM
I find something profoundly compelling that speaks to the ingenuity and curiousity and limitlessness of man when I see surface pictures of other worlds. The Russian Venus stills, too. Thanks for the link, subby.

croesius: That cartoon....so damn sad! I hate when anthromorphosized objects affect my emotions!
There's an alternate dialog one on the site that is actually more accurate. (YAY SCIENCE.... etc YAY STATIONARY LABORATORY!)
 
2011-10-12 09:05:22 AM
croesius

That cartoon....so damn sad!
^ This
 
2011-10-12 09:38:24 AM
So, the whole cost of the rover mission was probably around the same amount that we spent on fueling airplanes to bomb Iraq. In one case, we got science and awesome pictures, in the other, we got... hot air? Turbulence? Carbon dioxide?

Excellent national priorities.
 
2011-10-12 10:17:56 AM
Fomby_Belcher: The only plausible explanation for the rear-facing photographs is that NASA had evidence that aliens were following the rover.


I was curious as to why we saw 2 sets of tracks when it looked back once. Did it have to backtrack for some reason? Perhaps an earlier sample location was later deemed worthy of an extra scoop?
 
2011-10-12 10:35:35 AM
Fomby_Belcher: The only plausible explanation for the rear-facing photographs is that NASA had evidence that aliens were following the rover.



t3.gstatic.com
 
2011-10-12 10:41:27 AM
I would actually very much enjoy if they did send a rover with a microphone. Granted all you'd hear is a very, very faint sound of wind blowing and such, if that, with so thin an atmosphere, but I mean how cool would that be?

Pity so much exploration of the solar system is getting the axe, or at least a push back in time frame. It would have been amazing to see more of Europa and the other Jovian moons.
 
2011-10-12 11:27:07 AM
3 years travel and not one Wal-Mart, that in itself is amazing.
 
2011-10-12 11:32:41 AM
Flying Lasagna Monster: The Mars rovers were designed to last 90 days. They landed in 2004, and yet we still have one that works. To keep that timeframe in perspective, Opportunity started its work on Mars before the founding of Youtube.

[marsrover.nasa.gov image 500x500]


OK, put this in perspective:

OSCAR 7 was built in a garage by amateur radio operators. It was launched into orbit 1974, and worked until a battery failure ended it's useful life in 1981. Then, in 2002, due to a change in battery chemistry that changed a short circuit in the battery to an open circuit, it came back to life. It's been semi-operational ever since then, available for use by radio amateurs while it's solar panels are illuminated.

It's been in orbit for 27 years, and is older than most farkers.
 
2011-10-12 12:05:13 PM
That doesn't look like the kind of place to raise your kids.
 
2011-10-12 12:28:06 PM
/srsly farkers?
//this long and still noone?
 
2011-10-12 12:29:46 PM
Well... I take it xkcd doesn't like to be hotlinked.
 
2011-10-12 12:45:32 PM
this: Link (new window)
 
2011-10-12 01:19:28 PM
Flying Lasagna Monster: The Mars rovers were designed to last 90 days. They landed in 2004, and yet we still have one that works. To keep that timeframe in perspective, Opportunity started its work on Mars before the founding of Youtube.

Doesn't that mean they were designed poorly?
 
2011-10-12 01:40:04 PM
DesertEagle: this: Link (new window)

Is that what you complaining that no one had posted yet? DammitIforgotMyLogin beat you by 4 hours.
 
2011-10-12 09:24:40 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ajsXzTFLYA

unimpressed.
 
2011-10-12 09:49:52 PM
Loomy: Fomby_Belcher: The only plausible explanation for the rear-facing photographs is that NASA had evidence that aliens were following the rover.


I was curious as to why we saw 2 sets of tracks when it looked back once. Did it have to backtrack for some reason? Perhaps an earlier sample location was later deemed worthy of an extra scoop?


At least two of the axis can turn independently for extra manuverability. That could account for the added tracks. Though it looks like it went one way and got stuck so went back the other way and really got stuck. Someone should go kick it a little to unstick it.
 
2011-10-12 10:35:11 PM
Road_King you rock! OP was the best thing I have seen in my life, and I am old.
 
2011-10-13 11:21:11 AM
croesius: That cartoon....so damn sad! I hate when anthromorphosized objects affect my emotions!

Many of you feel bad for this rover. That is because your crazy. It has no feelings, and the new one is much better.
 
Displayed 30 of 30 comments


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »