If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Daily Mail) Interesting Half of US population lives in a household that receives state benefits. That's one big house   (dailymail.co.uk) divider line 174
More: Interesting, Social Securities, welfare system, Emmy Rossum, Tax Policy Center, U.S. population, Allison Janney, William H Macy, poverty line  
•       •       •

6359 clicks; posted to Main » on 07 Oct 2011 at 12:04 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



174 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-10-06 09:27:13 PM
Must be Mexicans
 
2011-10-06 09:30:23 PM
I wonder how long we can keep pretending that our economy isn't in trouble?
 
2011-10-06 09:34:16 PM
I wonder how long we can keep pretending that political ambitions and public funds aren't intertwined?
 
2011-10-06 09:35:46 PM
Wanebo: I wonder how long we can keep pretending that political ambitions and public funds aren't intertwined?

you mean the wall street bailouts? the tea party sure does a good job distracting people from that mess of a situation.
 
2011-10-06 09:39:07 PM
Weaver95: Wanebo: I wonder how long we can keep pretending that political ambitions and public funds aren't intertwined?

you mean the wall street bailouts? the tea party sure does a good job distracting people from that mess of a situation.


Those also.
 
2011-10-06 09:43:34 PM
Clearly, a nice set of tax breaks for top earners are in order.
 
2011-10-06 09:47:39 PM
clancifer: Clearly, a nice set of tax breaks for top earners are in order.

Hey, if the job creators aren't given tax breaks they won't create jobs, and then, I don't know, half of the US will be getting government assistance or something.

Thankfully, all the tax breaks they've been getting have led to them creating more jobs than anyone could possibly fill, not just hoarding their money like old misers while telling the people to go fark themselves.

LOW TAXES FOR THE RICH! JOB CREATORS!
 
2011-10-06 10:01:30 PM
What are we defining as state benefits? Social Security? Medicare? Free public schools? Federal subsidized loans? Because if we include those, I bet we're somewhere about 80%.
 
NFA [TotalFark]
2011-10-06 10:01:44 PM
FirstNationalBastard: Thankfully, all the tax breaks they've been getting have led to them creating more jobs than anyone

Yes, they eliminated 2.5 million US jobs over the past decade and created 3 million jobs overseas. Yaaaaaaa! tax breaks work!!!

Let's be clear. Tax breaks don't create jobs. Expanding your business CREATES a tax break. If you own a business why in the hell would you hire employees you don't need when you can put the money in your bank account? Taxing companies gives them an incentive to hide their money by expanding their business and writing off the expenses. TAXATION CREATES JOBS because it motivates companies to utilize expand and write off the expenses.

If you own a business, would you hand the money to the government or spend it on your business and write it off your taxes?
 
2011-10-06 10:41:19 PM
Here's my problem with this. Most people look at this kind of stat and think, "OMG FREELOADERS!"

But the scary thing is that this is what the "government" wants. It wants its citizens dependent on the collective generosity.
 
2011-10-06 10:50:06 PM
We like to simultaneously pretend that our "government" somehow has control of us and that it is controlled by us.
 
2011-10-06 11:00:25 PM
Yes, because half the nation doesn't even make enough money to pay federal income tax.

But lets keep coddling the "job creators".
 
2011-10-06 11:08:43 PM
jaylectricity: Here's my problem with this. Most people look at this kind of stat and think, "OMG FREELOADERS!"

But the scary thing is that this is what the "government" wants. It wants its citizens dependent on the collective generosity.


PRWORA. Thanks, Clinton.
 
2011-10-06 11:50:57 PM
Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.
 
2011-10-06 11:58:50 PM
serial_crusher: Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.

just let me know before this goes into effect so I can stock up on canned goods and ammo.
 
2011-10-07 12:00:49 AM
SilentStrider: serial_crusher: Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.

just let me know before this goes into effect so I can stock up on canned goods and ammo.
 
2011-10-07 12:05:52 AM
GAT_00: What are we defining as state benefits? Social Security? Medicare? Free public schools? Federal subsidized loans? Because if we include those, I bet we're somewhere about 80%.

Roads and utility infrastructure and we're at 99%. Just the hillbillies and hippies that are completely self sufficient off the grid.
 
2011-10-07 12:06:39 AM
serial_crusher: Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.

No, it's cut federal taxes and shift the burden to the states. If the state wants lots of social programs, they can have grow their tax base or raise taxes or some combination of the two.

If it just wants as many people employed, no matter what the pay, follow the example of Texas. Lots of minimum wage jobs and a limited social safety net!
 
2011-10-07 12:07:00 AM
I like my food "stamps" . . .
 
2011-10-07 12:11:48 AM
that doesnt sound very bootstrappy.
 
2011-10-07 12:11:52 AM
Clearly, we need to cut the social safety net further, because those shiftless leeches are bleeding the poor, noble job creators dry.
 
2011-10-07 12:12:26 AM
clancifer: Clearly, a nice set of tax breaks for top earners are in order.

i631.photobucket.com
 
2011-10-07 12:12:31 AM
ArkAngel: Must be Mexicans

done in one...
 
2011-10-07 12:19:13 AM
GAT_00: What are we defining as state benefits? Social Security? Medicare? Free public schools? Federal subsidized loans? Because if we include those, I bet we're somewhere about 80%.

If you throw in the tax credit for having children, the tax exemption for employer-sponsored health insurance, and the tax deduction for mortgage interest, you'll probably approach 100%.
 
2011-10-07 12:20:26 AM
meat0918: serial_crusher: Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.

No, it's cut federal taxes and shift the burden to the states. If the state wants lots of social programs, they can have grow their tax base or raise taxes or some combination of the two.

If it just wants as many people employed, no matter what the pay, follow the example of Texas. Lots of minimum wage jobs and a limited social safety net!


This.
 
2011-10-07 12:20:29 AM
Army field artillery 2002-2006, Afghanistan April 05-Feb06.

Got out, lived on GI Bill. I received state and federal pell grants. My son and I were also on food stamps for about a year (single parent, a side effect of modern day military optempo).

Now I'm an air traffic controller. So far this year I have paid over 9K in federal taxes alone (not counting soc/sec or state/local tax). I think the government will get a good ROI on my salary over the next 25 years or so.

I have no problems with people trying to do the right thing on the system. It helped my son and me. It helped a lot.

/ATC Rocks!
//zzzzzzzzzzzz......
 
2011-10-07 12:22:58 AM
I wonder whether we should listen to British tabloids.
 
2011-10-07 12:23:19 AM
How many of them are multi-millionaires? How many of them made their millions from government contracts? How many of them paid off the right politicians to get tax breaks and subsidies?

Ever listen to a conservative that just happens to be in a union? Funny how they talk about working hard and personal responsibility while sitting on their fat, graying asses.

The conservative freaks are the biggest pussies of them all.
 
2011-10-07 12:23:36 AM
I've never liked being on food stamps

/they taste terrible
//even with ketchup
 
2011-10-07 12:24:25 AM
NFA: TAXATION CREATES JOBS because it motivates companies to utilize expand and write off the expenses.

Dear God. And it can actually operate a computer.
 
2011-10-07 12:24:38 AM
meat0918: serial_crusher: Solution is simple. Fewer state benefits.

No, it's cut federal taxes and shift the burden to the states. If the state wants lots of social programs, they can have grow their tax base or raise taxes or some combination of the two.

If it just wants as many people employed, no matter what the pay, follow the example of Texas. Lots of minimum wage jobs and a limited social safety net!


Which is fine as long as you give the states the power to deport. CA spends ~$10b year on social services for illegals, which in recent years has been around the number of the state deficit
 
2011-10-07 12:25:44 AM
NFA: Let's be clear. Tax breaks don't create jobs. Expanding your business CREATES a tax break. If you own a business why in the hell would you hire employees you don't need when you can put the money in your bank account? Taxing companies gives them an incentive hide their money by expanding their business and writing off the expenses. TAXATION CREATES JOBS because it motivates companies to utilize expand and write off the expenses.

Do you have a study demonstrating or credible economist arguing for the relationship you suggest between higher taxation and businesses creating jobs or is this just the looter's equivalent of the Laffer curve?
 
2011-10-07 12:27:51 AM
I get a refund at tax time, therefore I pay no taxes, and my wife and I make a rather nice sum of money. EVERYONE above like $10k/year gets taxes taken out. This "statistic" is Sophistry.
 
2011-10-07 12:28:54 AM
Its only going to get worse.
 
2011-10-07 12:28:58 AM
I can only base my opinion on my experience. That said, I've made it to 32 with a job, a wife, two kids, and a house we can afford without ever receiving any government aid. So to those on government assistance, I say, f*ck you. Rot and die you leeches.
 
JVD
2011-10-07 12:29:03 AM
Apparently, I'm doing it somewhat right.

By right I mean, while not being rich, I'm not a leech on the system, yet I survive. I make it on my own... I make too little to be completely comfortable yet too much to receive a handout.

No one ever said you have a right to be comfortable or happy in this country, but the right to pursue happiness. I'm working on it, It's somewhere out there and I'll get it eventually, I'm in pursuit.
 
2011-10-07 12:29:24 AM
But.. but.. they have a refrigerator!
 
2011-10-07 12:29:54 AM
"They'll turn us all into beggars 'cause they're easier to please..."
 
2011-10-07 12:30:03 AM
I love how the Daily Fail (from the UK where there are Generations of households where no one has ever held a job) is trying to make USA look bad for people getting benefits. If they look at their stats it's probably something like 80%.
 
2011-10-07 12:30:15 AM
meat0918: No, it's cut federal taxes and shift the burden to the states. If the state wants lots of social programs, they can have grow their tax base or raise taxes or some combination of the two.

Exactly. And Conservatives have solution to "bad" states that tax too high or have horrible social benefits: move. Really. That's their actual solution. THIS IS WHAT CONSERVATIVES ACTUALLY BELIEVE.
 
2011-10-07 12:30:51 AM
MaudlinMutantMollusk: I've never liked being on food stamps

/they taste terrible
//even with ketchup


img156.imageshack.us
 
2011-10-07 12:31:38 AM
ArkAngel: Must be Mexicans

kneeslappers.info
 
2011-10-07 12:32:32 AM
If half of the population is paying support to the state, and half of the population is receiving benefits, and the half that is poor in this equation is rioting, how the hell is this fair or good?

People with jobs (and not part time ones)- these lefties want to eat you. You are the capitalists.
 
2011-10-07 12:32:32 AM
i269.photobucket.com

what people in a household that receives state benefits might look like.
 
2011-10-07 12:34:24 AM
ArkAngel: Must be Mexicans

There are alot, A LOT of unwed teenage white mothers.
You just gotta go to the south.
 
2011-10-07 12:34:41 AM
clancifer: Clearly, a nice set of tax breaks for top earners are in order.

Hell, we ain't broke yet, throw in a fast attack sub annnnnd two of those aircraft carriers you got over there. HowmIdoinow? Good? Wrap 'em up. I'll take 'em to go.

Somehow nothin' ever trickled down to my paycheck. Who should I talk to about that?
 
2011-10-07 12:34:59 AM
Bollywood. India is looking more and more attractive.
img855.imageshack.us
 
2011-10-07 12:36:34 AM
I'm always a little surprised by these types of stats. I've never made much money but I've always paid at least a little in income tax every year that I worked. The percentages have been low but I've never had a 0 or negative income tax.
 
2011-10-07 12:36:59 AM
insolent_bystander: Army field artillery 2002-2006, Afghanistan April 05-Feb06.

Got out, lived on GI Bill. I received state and federal pell grants. My son and I were also on food stamps for about a year (single parent, a side effect of modern day military optempo).

Now I'm an air traffic controller. So far this year I have paid over 9K in federal taxes alone (not counting soc/sec or state/local tax). I think the government will get a good ROI on my salary over the next 25 years or so.

I have no problems with people trying to do the right thing on the system. It helped my son and me. It helped a lot.

.


great result. nice when the system works.
worth every dime,
enjoy your son!
 
2011-10-07 12:40:45 AM
At the risk of being trolled...

Contrabulous Flabtraption, please understand that not everyone on the system is a leach.

It is purely TEMPORARY for some people and not a system of dependence for everybody.

I was happy to no longer need FS or grants. You can't throw out the whole system because some people abuse it.
 
Displayed 50 of 174 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »