If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support
style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Soooo... since Congress is on vacation and can't fund the FAA for a month, does this mean the Dow is dropping because of all the anticipated plane wrecks and terrorism?
To pre-empt the morons: a 500pt Dow drop is NOT a reaction to a policy, it's a reaction to the idea that a small group of people can force the United States to reneg on its debt obligations.
Thanks for caving to the Republicans again, Obama.
They've managed to get you to go along with wrecking the economy and laying the groundwork for destroying the social safety net. Congratulations, Mr. President..
Gee, a budget bill that cuts spending during a looming recession, does nothing to encourage job growth, and doesn't increase revenues to lower the deficit, and the economic markets aren't encouraged?
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
Which lead to American supremacy and the greatest decade in the history of humanity. Why do you hate America?
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
Should we view it as both sides' fault, and thus vote Republican?
palelizard:nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
Which lead to American supremacy and the greatest decade in the history of humanity. Why do you hate America?
Because I imagine this will be the century this country tears itself apart. We have surpassed the derp ceiling, and now I fear a derpfault.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Or we could look at what actually happened and not just who is in office.
By next thursday, things will be back to normal and the news will have something different to follow. /but please, continue to think we're headed toward oblivion. Sell your stocks so I can buy them low.
I Said:To pre-empt the morons: a 500pt Dow drop is NOT a reaction to a policy, it's a reaction to the idea that a small group of people can force the United States to reneg on its debt obligations.
Exactly. The fact that a small group of American politicians (in this case, the The Tea Party) can actually hold the entire country's (and the world's) economy hostage if they don't get what they want, and that Democrats were willing to let them get away with it, doesn't exactly lead to investor confidence.
This damage was done days and days before the compromise bills was passed. This is a politician created crisis caused by amateur Tea Party Freshman who had no idea what kind of forces they were farking with.
Honestly, seeing these things, I've come to the conclusion that there are very little Republicans in Congress, and very little Democrats as well. Instead, there are members of a third party, a rather old party that has, very recently, started to up their ante: The Plutocrat Party.
Muta:Don't blame Obama. Remember, the GOP won. Boner got what he wanted and Wall Street is voting with their money.
I blame Obama AND the Republicans.
I blame Republicans for pushing a bad policy and I blame Obama for being such a farktarded negotiator that he ended up caving to them, adopting their mantra -- and giving them more in the end than they were asking for in the beginning.
palelizard:Soooo... since Congress is on vacation and can't fund the FAA for a month, does this mean the Dow is dropping because of all the anticipated plane wrecks and terrorism?
Or is it just a bad day?
They got a temporary deal done on the FAA. This is just because everything else sucks.
Styro Foam:This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
It's that, plus the deepening financial crisis in Europe. Pretty soon someone over there 'too big to fail' is going to default, and Germany will be either unable or unwilling to finance yet another bailout.
If that leads to another banking crisis over there, we're pretty much screwed.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
The economy tanked in 2007-2008 because of Republican principles - deregulation, cutting taxes, starting wars that are not paid for.
Economy will tank again in 2011 because of Republican principles - unwillingness to raise taxes, unwillingness to cut defense spending and their attempt to throw union busting in every farking bill.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
or maybe you know.. it's more complex than simply the party associated with the ass sitting in the chair. perhaps it has something to do with the actions of those people.
but that would be you know.. a reflection of farkIN REALITY and teabagger dumbfarks like you just cannot handle reality.
dumbass.
I personally don't really blame it on anyone in the government (the teabaggers are a bunch of fiscal terrorist asswipes) because:
IT'S A MARKET CORRECTION TRIGGERED BY THE DEBT CEILING shiat - IT WAS COMING ANYWAY. SOMETHING ELSE WOULD HAVE EVENTUALLY TRIPPED IT
Personally I think this was just a "clear out the suckers" drop. There was no logical reason the stock market should have been up to 12 thousand to begin with.
devildog123:Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
The system is broken. It's always going to be a partisan pissing contest of placing blame, as long as the people making decisions are focused on getting votes and getting re-elected, and as long as the people voting for these morons think their candidate who opposed abortion and has FSM's blessing must be the ones making all the right decisions.
The only possible result is crisis from lack of accepting responsibility, and figuring out how to deal with it. There's no hope of averting crisis or picking our poison and cutting back and righting the ship under responsible terms.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
While normally I would agree with a statement like this, in THIS particular case, this was a 100% Republican created crisis. I shouldn't even say Republican, I should say Tea Party, because even the more sane Republican members of congress and senate couldn't believe that they were doing this.
But yes, blame does go to the Democrats for allowing this to happen. They should have been stronger.
nekulor:palelizard: nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
Which lead to American supremacy and the greatest decade in the history of humanity. Why do you hate America?
Because I imagine this will be the century this country tears itself apart. We have surpassed the derp ceiling, and now I fear a derpfault.
I think we're a bit tougher than that. But if a herpaggedon is in the cards, I hope I get to be the blind guy with a sword.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
Markets love 1 thing more than anything else: Stability. Companies like to know what expenses they can and cannot take on, and what incomes they can and cannot rely on.
This recent crisis was the DIRECT RESULT of the Tea Party and the GOP threatening to not allow the United States to meet its existing debt obligations. If companies and countries cannot rely on the credit of the United States, then there is no institution they can rely on. If they cannot rely on any institution, that results in instability and market panic.
Once again, this is not a 2 party problem. This is a completely partisan issue.
Lowering vs raising spending? THAT is a two party issue, and that can be done in a variety of ways during the budget process. But this is a small group quite literally holding the markets hostage until they get their way, because they've been unable to get their way through legitimate means.
These are the "fiscal conservatives", who put 10 years of spending increases on credit, now saying "f*ck it. Either give me more of what I want or I won't let you pay off the debts I incurred".
So f*ck them. F*ck anyone who defends their tactics. And f*ck anyone not paying attention and saying "Ugh, politics is ugly, both parties are terrible, both parties are wrong". Saying that means you either aren't following, can't understand basic economics, can't understand basic civics, or all three.
eraser8:Muta: Don't blame Obama. Remember, the GOP won. Boner got what he wanted and Wall Street is voting with their money.
I blame Obama AND the Republicans.
I blame Republicans for pushing a bad policy and I blame Obama for being such a farktarded negotiator that he ended up caving to them, adopting their mantra -- and giving them more in the end than they were asking for in the beginning.
This. It's the fault of the brainless who strongly push their flawed agenda, and the spineless that cave to them. It's about 50/50 now.
palelizard:nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
Which lead to American supremacy and the greatest decade in the history of humanity. Why do you hate America?
Now we just need to find someone to carpet bomb Europe for a few years and we'll be sitting pretty.
It's not real money. Seriously. You think your 401k is worth a specific dollar amount? It's not. When you *sell* it, it is. If you're not planning on selling, why worry about it?
That was the thing that made me facepalm back in '09 when all those idiots were on the news cashing out their stocks. When the market was ~7000, they SOLD. Now, people are crying because the markets only 11k? Woopty farking do. Think of those poor dumb farkers who sold at 7000, and made that loss real.
Hey E.U. and U.S.A., PM Sweatervest McLegohair here. Seriously WTF? We're doing ok here and if you keep up this shiat we'll be in the same screwed up situation as you guys soon.
DarnoKonrad:Wallstreet is not all free market zealots. They listen to what most economists are saying: cutting spending now is stupid and counter productive.
Welcome to 1938 redux
"I don't care what the Economists say!!! Economism doesn't work. Look what happened to Russia!" \
organizmx:Exactly. The fact that a small group of American politicians (in this case, the The Tea Party) can actually hold the entire country's (and the world's) economy hostage if they don't get what they want, and that Democrats were willing to let them get away with it, doesn't exactly lead to investor confidence.
This damage was done days and days before the compromise bills was passed. This is a politician created crisis caused by amateur Tea Party Freshman who had no idea what kind of forces they were farking with.
This is retarded.
If this was the case, the markets would have tanked 2 weeks ago, not the day after the deal passed.. especially since the deal was basically smoke and mirrors that don't take effect... if they ever take effect for many years down the line.
If anything, the markets are reacting to the US gov'ts inability to solve any real issue with regard to their debt.
"The legislation will solve this debt crisis and help get the American people back to work." - John Boehner when the House voted on the debt bill this week
PanicMan:palelizard: nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
Which lead to American supremacy and the greatest decade in the history of humanity. Why do you hate America?
Now we just need to find someone to carpet bomb Europe for a few years and we'll be sitting pretty.
At this point China is the threat. So it's clear. In order to secure our economic position, we must invade China.
MSFT was up to 28 last week. I thought about selling, then rebuying when it drops but I thought "No, no, let's be a good long term investor and just wait."
Here is a link to a PBS piece I cought last night, with two analysts basically saying that the political process is broken, and likely cannot be fixed. (new window) Keep in mind, these aren't run of the mill pundits you find on Fox or MSNBC. One is from Harvard, the other from Yale...and they both say we're farked.
2.) this is probably based more on Europe than our actions
3.) if we hadn't capitulated to Republican demands, it would have been a LOT worseIf Republicans wouldn't have made insane demands it would have been a LOT better.
Styro Foam:This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
Seriously Wil-e-Coyote was one of his economic advisers....
Thud
This has absolutely nothing to do with Obama's economic policies.
Obama has no economic policies.
He is a weak leader who, time and again, has adopted whatever harebrained economic scheme right wingnuts have advocated. You can see it in his stimulus, in his health care law, in his 2010 tax cuts, in his latest budget resolution and in his agreement to raise the debt ceiling. And, the country is suffering from his fecklessness.
Yeah, the Tea Baggers...blame that small minority who has been holding office for all of a few years, deffinately their fault that the government and economy are FUBAR. You are a farking moron
The key is to invest in gold, but only gold in the shape of triangles. This approach is known as the...golden rectangle approach, due to the nature of square numbers.
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This.
Isn't gold up like 40% in the last 2 years? Not saying I want to buy any... but jeez, you'd have to be kind of dense to think there isn't something epic going to happen in the 6-36 months ahead range.
Satanicpuppy:Oh. No. It. Dropped. What. Ever. Will. I. Do?
It's not real money. Seriously. You think your 401k is worth a specific dollar amount? It's not. When you *sell* it, it is. If you're not planning on selling, why worry about it?
That was the thing that made me facepalm back in '09 when all those idiots were on the news cashing out their stocks. When the market was ~7000, they SOLD. Now, people are crying because the markets only 11k? Woopty farking do. Think of those poor dumb farkers who sold at 7000, and made that loss real.
Guess how I know you do not know how mutual funds (which most average joes are in) work?
2.) this is probably based more on Europe than our actions
This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
3.) if we hadn't capitulated to Republican demands, it would have been a LOT worse
Are you saying it would have been worse to drag the process past August 2nd, or it would have been worse to have a "balanced approach"?
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
I can't imagine us being on the right side of a similar war if fascism does indeed come to America wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.
essucht:Styro Foam: This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
[m2.wnymedia.net image 640x400]
Change. I brought it
This turd-based economy was handed to him, he didn't do this. I don't blame Bush though - he was too busy fighting wars and cutting taxes. I blame Alan Farking Greenspan.
essucht:Styro Foam: This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
[m2.wnymedia.net image 640x400]
Change. I brought it
What the hell are you talking about? We have had a Republican budget passed in April and then these budget cuts forced on by REPUBLICANs plus the Bush tax cuts.
The economy was recovering until the Tea Party got int congress and decided to start making all these cuts.
IT has a lot to to with the debt deal AND the REPUBLICAN BUDGET PASSED IN APRIL!!
Sweet, I put in my index fund buy order yesterday and the bank transfer hasn't gone through yet; it'll probably happen tomorrow morning. I meant to do it over the last weekend (I routinely buy around the start of every month) but just forgot. See, kids, benefits of procrastination!
palelizard:Soooo... since Congress is on vacation and can't fund the FAA for a month, does this mean the Dow is dropping because of all the anticipated plane wrecks and terrorism?
Or is it just a bad day?
I hate defending congress, but apparently they came to a deal: Link (new window)
pisceandreamer:palelizard: Soooo... since Congress is on vacation and can't fund the FAA for a month, does this mean the Dow is dropping because of all the anticipated plane wrecks and terrorism?
Or is it just a bad day?
They got a temporary deal done on the FAA. This is just because everything else sucks.
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
Now we're all going to suffer the consequences.
dahmers love zombie:Gee, a budget bill that cuts spending during a looming recession, does nothing to encourage job growth, and doesn't increase revenues to lower the deficit, and the economic markets aren't encouraged?
Color me shocked.
eraser8:Thanks for caving to the Republicans again, Obama.
They've managed to get you to go along with wrecking the economy and laying the groundwork for destroying the social safety net. Congratulations, Mr. President..
You imbeciles do realize that a large component of investor skittishness has to do with anticipation of the shiatty jobs reports coming out, right? The euro markets also play a role (and they are in the situation they are in due to out of control spending and expansion of the PIIGS governments' beyond that permitted by revenue and growth), and finally, there weren't enough cuts made in the debt ceiling deal to fully satisfy the most respected crediting agencies.
So yeah, clearly lets blame the baggers, who were trying to cut the spending, which is what would have made the creditors happier and at least put a temp bandage on this growing hemorrhage...
I'm not saying the baggers aren't morans when it comes to other things, but ultimately, from a markets perspective, cuts are needed now. Toss your partisan, liberal ideology aside for a moment and look at the economic realities. Keynesian economics only work when a World War destroys all major industrial powers and leaves America with the keys to the global economy.
Madbassist1:Here is a link to a PBS piece I cought last night, with two analysts basically saying that the political process is broken, and likely cannot be fixed. (new window) Keep in mind, these aren't run of the mill pundits you find on Fox or MSNBC. One is from Harvard, the other from Yale...and they both say we're farked.
/I'm scared //Seriously
Dude. Lighten up. Just invest in hookers and blow! Then, no worries
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This is why I keep saying: Every 40 - 60 years the Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany, Italy, and Japan. We'll clearly never agree on how the economy bounced back after WWII, but we all agree that it did. And maybe we just need to please the "World War Gods".
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
There is no legitimate comparison between the economic crises caused by the Treaty of Versailles and the economic crises going on in the EU now. Maybe there is a connection in Afghanistan? But you can chillax and aim your Godwin guns at another thread.
The stupid in this thread is epic. This crash has nothing to do with the debt deal. It's becoming obvious that the WORLD economy is not recovering from the last financial collapse, and that a financial system collapse is about to become a state debt collapse.
In other words, get your heads out of your asses and recognize this is a global problem.
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
Now we're all going to suffer the consequences.
Wait a minute. Everyone said this, economic collapse, would happen if the debt ceiling wasn't raise. The ceiling was raised, and yet this is still happening. I still contend we should have tried something new this time.
Corvus:essucht: Styro Foam: This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
[m2.wnymedia.net image 640x400]
Change. I brought it
What the hell are you talking about? We have had a Republican budget passed in April and then these budget cuts forced on by REPUBLICANs plus the Bush tax cuts.
The economy was recovering until the Tea Party got int congress and decided to start making all these cuts.
IT has a lot to to with the debt deal AND the REPUBLICAN BUDGET PASSED IN APRIL!!
Exactly. Raising the debt ceiling didn't spend any money at all, it only allowed us to write the checks for the money the Republicans already spent in their budget. The Teabaggers holding that process hostage is what stabbed the markets in the face.
Styro Foam:This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
That's not entirely true.
The debt deal promises to remove TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the US economy.
Any reasonable trader is obviously going to assume that that kind of withdrawal is going to hurt economic growth.
Think about it: at a time when the economy is slowing to a near halt, the government decides that it's a great idea to -- again, for emphasis -- remove TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the US economy.
How can anyone paying attention NOT expect another recession? How can he not expect serious contraction?
Plus, the Eurozone isn't exactly showing positive signs.
MugzyBrown:organizmx: Exactly. The fact that a small group of American politicians (in this case, the The Tea Party) can actually hold the entire country's (and the world's) economy hostage if they don't get what they want, and that Democrats were willing to let them get away with it, doesn't exactly lead to investor confidence.
This damage was done days and days before the compromise bills was passed. This is a politician created crisis caused by amateur Tea Party Freshman who had no idea what kind of forces they were farking with.
This is retarded.
If this was the case, the markets would have tanked 2 weeks ago, not the day after the deal passed.. especially since the deal was basically smoke and mirrors that don't take effect... if they ever take effect for many years down the line.
If anything, the markets are reacting to the US gov'ts inability to solve any real issue with regard to their debt.
100% correct.
There was NO WAY the US was going to default on its obligations. It was all political theater. The tea party people are 100% correct in that US spending MUST be brought under control, and drastically. The way they went about it was not the best way to do it, but it got everyone's attention.
The US debt is now at 100% of GDP. We are a broke nation and that bullshiat bill that was just passed to raise the debt ceiling was and is a joke.
There needs to be SERIOUS reductions in spending and tax major structure reforms before ANYTHING will change.
You cannot run deficits like we have been and have a 70,000+ page tax code and expect the country to stay solvent. It just won't happen.
This is why black people shouldn't have control of finances. They run up the debt, then keep asking for more money. Eventually people are going to get sick of your IOU's. I'm sorry, but the government isnt going to keep bailing you out. You have to start working at some point.
Oh you mean the budget that Pelosi totally BAILED on before November 2010. That wasn't GOPs budget, that was Pelosi's budget, she just abdicated her duty.
I Said:This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
Eurozone Debt Crisis.
Specifically: "World stock markets tumbled sharply again on Thursday, wiping nearly £50bn off the value of Britain's biggest listed companies, as the eurozone crisis and fears over the global economy sparked another rout in the City.
The FTSE 100 index fell by 191.27 points to close at 5393.14, its lowest closing level since 2 September 2010. At 3.43%, this is the index's biggest daily fall in percentage terms since 30 March 2009, and the biggest points fall since 2 March 2009."
stewmadness:Oh, and it's laughable for dems to make John Nobody more accountable than our Leninist president.
GODDAMN YOU'RE A farkIN RETARD
If our president was a Leninist you'd now be a in a farkin gulag in siberia you goddamn farkin jackass unamerican piece of shiat
/yes i'm mad bro, i'm tired of right wing pants poissin cowardly unamerican farktards shooting off their mouth and having no farking idea what the meaning of theords coming out of their mouth is //if you cannot understand farking modern society get the fark out of the united states you goddamn asshats. stop ruinin the greatest country on the planet with your christian supremacism and your farking "every man is an island" rugged individualist bullshiat
Hey E.U. and U.S.A., PM Sweatervest McLegohair here. Seriously WTF? We're doing ok here and if you keep up this shiat we'll be in the same screwed up situation as you guys soon.
Steve McQueen's Motorcycle:You cannot run deficits like we have been and have a 70,000+ page tax code and expect the country to stay solvent. It just won't happen.
I Said: This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
At least from what I've been reading, it started because of the European Central Bank was expected to intervene in Italy and Spain, but they only decided to really help Ireland and Portugal. The debt crisis didn't help, but the market wouldn't have dropped 500 points based on that alone.
Are you saying it would have been worse to drag the process past August 2nd, or it would have been worse to have a "balanced approach"?
If we defaulted it would have been catastrophic. I can't believe that anybody that is supported by businesses like the Republican party would even flirt with that idea. It is madness.
MugzyBrown:organizmx: Exactly. The fact that a small group of American politicians (in this case, the The Tea Party) can actually hold the entire country's (and the world's) economy hostage if they don't get what they want, and that Democrats were willing to let them get away with it, doesn't exactly lead to investor confidence.
This damage was done days and days before the compromise bills was passed. This is a politician created crisis caused by amateur Tea Party Freshman who had no idea what kind of forces they were farking with.
This is retarded.
If this was the case, the markets would have tanked 2 weeks ago, not the day after the deal passed.. especially since the deal was basically smoke and mirrors that don't take effect... if they ever take effect for many years down the line.
If anything, the markets are reacting to the US gov'ts inability to solve any real issue with regard to their debt.
I think we're both saying the sort of the same thing.
BigBooper:The stupid in this thread is epic. This crash has nothing to do with the debt deal. It's becoming obvious that the WORLD economy is not recovering from the last financial collapse, and that a financial system collapse is about to become a state debt collapse.
In other words, get your heads out of your asses and recognize this is a global problem.
/state=country //morans
If I can't see it from my house it doesn't exist.
I can see Manhattan, Nassau County, and some water. . . .I blame nassau county. It's full of Republicans.
Corvus: What the hell are you talking about? We have had a Republican budget passed in April and then these budget cuts forced on by REPUBLICANs plus the Bush tax cuts.
The economy was recovering until the Tea Party got int congress and decided to start making all these cuts.
IT has a lot to to with the debt deal AND the REPUBLICAN BUDGET PASSED IN APRIL!!
This isn't a panic about America's allegedly unmanageable debt, or the fairly minor spending cuts that will fall almost entirely 3-10 years from now, or even the fact that we've demonstrated that large political factions in this country are not only willing, but eager, to provoke a major financial catastrophe to stick it to the libs -- although none of these are exactly positive factors, US Treasury yields have fallen tremendously this week, at both the long and short ends. People aren't excessively worried that we'll be unable to unwilling to pay our sovereign debt. They're probably not scared enough, honestly.
Much of Europe, on the other hand, is already difficulty servicing its debt, and the situation appears to be accelerating, with Italy and Spain borrowing at something like 400bp over German debt. And we got absolutely horrific GDP figures (including substantial negative revisions going back three years) and a bad-to-abysmal consumer spending report this week. Plus Switzerland and Japan and farking around with their currencies.
As ridiculous as the US government has become, it's factors it can't control even in theory that are causing the window-jumping at the moment.
eraser8:The debt deal promises to remove TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the US economy.
Any reasonable trader is obviously going to assume that that kind of withdrawal is going to hurt economic growth.
I'd agree with this analysis if the debt deal had contained any real surprises. But the deal they settled on is roughly what everyone had been expecting for weeks or months (namely, spending cuts and nebulous plans for more savings, not likely on the revenue side), so it doesn't really explain why this happened right now.
Oh you mean the budget that Pelosi totally BAILED on before November 2010. That wasn't GOPs budget, that was Pelosi's budget, she just abdicated her duty.
DERP.
Yeah the Budget Republicans AUTHORED and passed with both a MAJORITY of Republicans in the house and senate.
So you complaint is "It's the Democrats fault because they should of known Republicans were too incompetent to make a budget".
RexTalionis:I Said: This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
Eurozone Debt Crisis.
Specifically: "World stock markets tumbled sharply again on Thursday, wiping nearly £50bn off the value of Britain's biggest listed companies, as the eurozone crisis and fears over the global economy sparked another rout in the City.
The FTSE 100 index fell by 191.27 points to close at 5393.14, its lowest closing level since 2 September 2010. At 3.43%, this is the index's biggest daily fall in percentage terms since 30 March 2009, and the biggest points fall since 2 March 2009."
Ah thanks.
SnakeLee:If we defaulted it would have been catastrophic. I can't believe that anybody that is supported by businesses like the Republican party would even flirt with that idea. It is madness.
I completely agree. Just wasn't sure which one you meant. Thanks.
The_Terminator: So yeah, clearly lets blame the baggers, who were trying to cut the spending,
Inhale deeply and repeat after me:
"WE CUT SPENDING DURING BUDGET NEGOTIATIONS, NOT DEBT CEILING NEGOTIATIONS."
If you think this fiasco was about anything other than a bunch of mentally challenged zealots sabotaging the entire process for their own political gain, then you're a sucker.
I Said:nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This is why I keep saying: Every 40 - 60 years the Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany, Italy, and Japan. We'll clearly never agree on how the economy bounced back after WWII, but we all agree that it did. And maybe we just need to please the "World War Gods".
I've often wondered if that very idea is innately in our DNA to control overpopulation....kinda like when rats have a baby binge and start running out of food they eat their offspring. Humans are much more sophisticated about population control. Rather than terminating pregnancies in utero, encouraging birth control or eating their young, they blow the bejezus out of each other every 40 to 60 years.
eraser8:Styro Foam: This isn't because of the debt deal, no matter how much I want to harp on that. This is because the economic growth statistics from the last few quarters have been revised down. Waaay down.
That's not entirely true.
The debt deal promises to remove TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the US economy.
Any reasonable trader is obviously going to assume that that kind of withdrawal is going to hurt economic growth.
Think about it: at a time when the economy is slowing to a near halt, the government decides that it's a great idea to -- again, for emphasis -- remove TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from the US economy.
How can anyone paying attention NOT expect another recession? How can he not expect serious contraction?
Plus, the Eurozone isn't exactly showing positive signs.
I think Fox News and Glenn Beck bought up fifty tons of gold, then started the teabagger bullshiat to ruin the economy and the country so they could profit. That's what I think. Loom what Bunker Hunt did with silver back in the early 80's.
This isn't a crash, the market never should have been this high to start with. It was propped up artificially by an idiotic stimulus plan, that only postponed the inevitable and has now come to an end. Has it ever occured to anybody that we never would have gotten out of the depression without the second dip? In other words, that it was the second dip that got us out of the depression, and all policy did was drag the whole thing along for ten years. We aren't getting out of this mess until we deleverage. Period. And everybody has to do it. People with credit card debt, mortgages, banks, businesses, and the government. All need to pay down borrowed money. Until we do, no recovery.
I Said:SnakeLee: 1.) it's not a market crash (yet)
2.) this is probably based more on Europe than our actions
This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
Spain and Italy coming saying they're screwed and the European Central Bank saying that it can't help them.
Cutting government spending during hard economic times will make the economy even worse. Now you can argue that the spending cuts were necessary anyway, but the result is inevitable.
devildog123 Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
The debt ceiling mess was not an example of "both sides are bad". It was a crisis created by one party, the Republicans. Not everything is equal and throwing out the "blame both" mantra is a cop out.
eraser8 I blame Republicans for pushing a bad policy and I blame Obama for being such a farktarded negotiator that he ended up caving to them, adopting their mantra -- and giving them more in the end than they were asking for in the beginning.
I agree that Obama could have negotiated better. On the other hand, it's difficult when one side, the GOP, is perfectly willing to drive the nation's economy off a cliff and the Democrats, rightfully so, are not. In this case the sheer idiocy, ignorance, and for some maliciousness of the GOP's willingness to ruin the economy gave them the bargaining advantage.
nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank.
This is also a factor. I suppose the GOP is blaming Obama for the European mess too. Yes, the EU's economy impacts our economy.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
Oh no no no---it's always the Republicans fault. ALWAYS. Because Liberals like to BLAME BLAME BLAME. Instead of listening,researching,and educating themselves about what is really going on. Obama did not cave the GOP compromised their pants off. Obama actually was BIPARTISAN-which is why people voted for him. It annoys the crap outta me.
I Said:BigBooper: The stupid in this thread is epic. This crash has nothing to do with the debt deal. It's becoming obvious that the WORLD economy is not recovering from the last financial collapse, and that a financial system collapse is about to become a state debt collapse.
In other words, get your heads out of your asses and recognize this is a global problem.
/state=country //morans
If I can't see it from my house it doesn't exist.
I can see Manhattan, Nassau County, and some water. . . .I blame nassau county. It's full of Republicans.
Man, you can keep Steve King. Never knew there was a way to get that much crazy elected.
The_Terminator:Keynesian economics only work when a World War destroys all major industrial powers and leaves America with the keys to the global economy.
nah.. it works fine when you're not buried in debt because the guy before you cut taxes and massively increased spending. Keynes basically said "Government spending can help stimulate an economy so it can climb out of a recession". our "Stimulus" was weaksauce shiat that didn't get maximum return for dollar spent (shiat like the WPA, etc is FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR more effective than tax cuts).
we were well on our way to climbing out of the hole before world war II started.
Keynesian economics break down when A) you're government is in deep debt due to bad fiscal policy during good times B) your citizens are in deep debt due to bad fiscal practices during good times
we have both A and B + ineffective forms of stimulus.
it isn't so much "Keynes was wrong" as it is "The effectiveness of Keynesian spending can be severely blunted by other factors".
I Said:Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany
I Said:nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This is why I keep saying: Every 40 - 60 years the Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany, Italy, and Japan. We'll clearly never agree on how the economy bounced back after WWII, but we all agree that it did. And maybe we just need to please the "World War Gods".
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
Markets love 1 thing more than anything else: Stability. Companies like to know what expenses they can and cannot take on, and what incomes they can and cannot rely on.
This recent crisis was the DIRECT RESULT of the Tea Party and the GOP threatening to not allow the United States to meet its existing debt obligations. If companies and countries cannot rely on the credit of the United States, then there is no institution they can rely on. If they cannot rely on any institution, that results in instability and market panic.
Once again, this is not a 2 party problem. This is a completely partisan issue.
Lowering vs raising spending? THAT is a two party issue, and that can be done in a variety of ways during the budget process. But this is a small group quite literally holding the markets hostage until they get their way, because they've been unable to get their way through legitimate means.
These are the "fiscal conservatives", who put 10 years of spending increases on credit, now saying "f*ck it. Either give me more of what I want or I won't let you pay off the debts I incurred".
So f*ck them. F*ck anyone who defends their tactics. And f*ck anyone not paying attention and saying "Ugh, politics is ugly, both parties are terrible, both parties are wrong". Saying that means you either aren't following, can't understand basic economics, can't understand basic civics, or all three.
organizmx:I think we're both saying the sort of the same thing.
No. You're blaming the Tea Party for causing problems. You may disagree with them, but they and the extreme left are the only caucuses that showed any principles in the end. They feel the US needs to balance their budget and refused to vote for the BS plan that was agreed to.
Everybody else caved to some BS deal with no teeth and just popped the debt ceiling up.
The market is reacting to nothing being done. There is no plan to get the debt in order. Obama has not presented anything, Boehner hasn't presented anything, Reid didn't present anything.
There finally was pressure to do something. There was a deadline, there was media focus, and in the end, nothing was accomplished. The defict and debt are still out of control with no plan to fix it.
The thing right wingers in this thread don;t want you to remember:
Republican's authored, and passed the budget we are in, in april. They demanded these cuts and didn't care if they lost jobs. They want to blame the budget on Democrats but it was authored by them and passed by Republican majorities in both the house and senate. It's a REPUBLICAN BUDGET.
Fat-D:I Said: nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This is why I keep saying: Every 40 - 60 years the Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany, Italy, and Japan. We'll clearly never agree on how the economy bounced back after WWII, but we all agree that it did. And maybe we just need to please the "World War Gods".
lol
May I quote you on that?
Of course. I'm no economist, and I don't know how it worked . . . but clearly, it worked.
Today's sell-off is a combination of Europe's situation (the biggest factor), weak US numbers, general global slowdown (japan, china, brazil), a correction from the market being overvalued in the first place, and plain old panic.
moocifer:I Said: SnakeLee: 1.) it's not a market crash (yet)
2.) this is probably based more on Europe than our actions
This might be me just not getting enough foreign news in my diet, but what happened in the last 2 - 3 days that's bigger than the US almost saying "f*ck it" to its bills?
Spain and Italy coming saying they're screwed and the European Central Bank saying that it can't help them.
Oh shiat, I haven't been looking at BBC News for a while. Europe is farked.
I wonder if any of this has anything to do with Bush's cronies systematically looting the national treasury & sending all our money to the middle east? Couldn't be, must be Obama's fault.
patrick767:The debt ceiling mess was not an example of "both sides are bad". It was a crisis created by one party, the Republicans..
It's pointless to blame the Republicans though, they simply represent a large population of ignorants. Blame falls squarely on our system that is capable of allowing ignorance to prevail. It still may be the best system.
I Said:BigBooper: The stupid in this thread is epic. This crash has nothing to do with the debt deal. It's becoming obvious that the WORLD economy is not recovering from the last financial collapse, and that a financial system collapse is about to become a state debt collapse.
In other words, get your heads out of your asses and recognize this is a global problem.
/state=country //morans
If I can't see it from my house it doesn't exist.
I can see Manhattan, Nassau County, and some water. . . .I blame nassau county. It's full of Republicans.
I line in Wisconsin. By the time I drive home tonight I expect to hear how this is the fault of a state senator that is up for recall. Seriously, the crap from both sides is getting epically silly.
organizmx:But yes, blame does go to the Democrats for allowing this to happen. They should have been stronger.
You see, there was this problem. The Democrats weren't stronger BECAUSE THE COUNTRY GOT STUPID AND ELECTED A BUNCH OF farkING TEABAGGING IDIOT REPUBLICANS TO THE HOUSE. Kind of hard to be stronger when you don't have the numbers. That's the whole problem when you blame the minority for the majority's fark up.
I Said:BigBooper: The stupid in this thread is epic. This crash has nothing to do with the debt deal. It's becoming obvious that the WORLD economy is not recovering from the last financial collapse, and that a financial system collapse is about to become a state debt collapse.
In other words, get your heads out of your asses and recognize this is a global problem.
/state=country //morans
If I can't see it from my house it doesn't exist.
I can see Manhattan, Nassau County, and some water. . . .I blame nassau county. It's full of Republicans.
You know who could fix this problem? John Cena! Brabbadooo! All we need is a little Hustle, Lyalty and Respect!
"I'm gonna get me a shotgun and kill all the whities I see, I'm gonna get me a shotgun and kill all the whities I see. When I kill all the whities I see, then whitey he won't bother me, I'm gonna get me a shotgun and kill all the whities I see. Then I'll get a white woman who's wearing a navy blue sweater.."
/WHAT A PISSED OFF INVESTOR MIGHT LOOK AND SOUND LIKE
There is something unsettling about that kitten. On first glance he sure looks like a cute, fuzzy kitty. But look real hard at his face. Some sort of vicious, analytical intelligence behind those dark, serious, soulless eyes.
There are people in this thread still blaming Bush. DON'T VOTE. No please just don't. You apparently have a grudge problem. /hate defending Bush makes me wanna barf.
Step one is down I have already panicked. I am working on step two in that I have already brained the guy in the cubicle next to me and have proceeded to eat the gooey insides. But now I am panicking again because I cannot remember step 3..... I know 4 is profit but what is step threee.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Yeah, the Tea Baggers...blame that small minority who has been holding office for all of a few years, deffinately their fault that the government and economy are FUBAR. You are a farking moron
Remember they own the debt ceiling deal and now I've read further down the thread and it's been pointed out that this could be about the jobs report and most certainly the Europeon economic crisis. Also I'm not a moron for having a possibly inaccurate viewpoint.
Jacobin:I Said: nekulor: The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
This is why I keep saying: Every 40 - 60 years the Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany, Italy, and Japan. We'll clearly never agree on how the economy bounced back after WWII, but we all agree that it did. And maybe we just need to please the "World War Gods".
I've often wondered if that very idea is innately in our DNA to control overpopulation....kinda like when rats have a baby binge and start running out of food they eat their offspring. Humans are much more sophisticated about population control. Rather than terminating pregnancies in utero, encouraging birth control or eating their young, they blow the bejezus out of each other every 40 to 60 years.
A lot of factors are coming into alignment with the pre WW2 world.
--Rise of the far right in Europe, combined with increasing xenophobia --Global economic hardship, which provides a platform and cause for populist demagogues --From a link up above, massively increased political polarization in the US
There's still a lot missing, but it's looking a lot like a big throwdown of some kind in the next 10-15 years.
Magnanimous_J:Mad_Radhu: Or else I'll eat this kitten.
There is something unsettling about that kitten. On first glance he sure looks like a cute, fuzzy kitty. But look real hard at his face. Some sort of vicious, analytical intelligence behind those dark, serious, soulless eyes.
I don't trust it.
That summed up just about every cat. Except my ginger tom. He's too farking stupid to plot (or maybe that's just what he WANTS me to think).
moocifer:Today's sell-off is a combination of Europe's situation (the biggest factor), weak US numbers, general global slowdown (japan, china, brazil), a correction from the market being overvalued in the first place, and plain old panic.
WTF is this rational analysis doing here?
We need to spend the thread debating whether we should pin all the blame on Obama or on the Tea Party.
Because there was no clause that allowed them to actually hunt and kill poor people.
Seriously, because these tea party psychotics wouldn't be fully satisfied unless they actually destroyed the government, ruined the economy beyond recovery, and then retired to their walled compounds while they await the rapture as civilization shreds itself.
To quote Jon Stewart " Yes, we still have traffic lights... we're sorry! Not everybody defines freedom as the ability to not pay taxes! Government isn't perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gone!"
Do you know what American Exceptionalism is? It is an ideology that cries out that America is, amongst all other things, unique in the sense that it is the truly first-born nation of a new world: A rising star in the sea of the ancient order, where all is bright and promises glory to those that stand by it.
This idea was very popular in the 19th Century, and the early 20th Century, and why the hell not? America was rising, giving birth to all sorts of bright ideas, and it was fantastic... For the Americans, that is, and not all of them. Only to a very powerful few, it was the nectar of the gods. These men owned steel companies, rail companies, gun companies, mining companies, congressmen, judges, hundreds and hundreds of workers and policemen. These men were powerful beyond their comprehension... And the workers suffered for it. There was no worker's rights at all, so it meant that they had to fend against whatever life threw at them with whatever they have. This is where the laborers started to organize and rally. Fights broke out, many people lost their jobs because of their demands, but in the end, they got what they wanted: Honest work for Honest pay.
But the plutocrats hated it. They hated to spend their money into these things, so they started to bribe officials, little by little: A police officer here, a congressman there, a union leader there, and they told their children and their grandchildren stories of how much money they had, and how much power they had.
Now, the descendants of these same men, corrupted by the wealth and power they grew up with, want the "old times" back. And they'll do anything to get them.
You act as if he ACTUALLY intended to crash the economy.
Incompetence then? Not that either.
In reality, we have two competing ideals. Compromise prolongs the problems. We have to choose savings by Republican methods, or increased revenue by Democrat methods. If we can't, we end up with more grid lock and last minute deals that do neither. The market sees out of control deficit, bad last minute deals, and no reason to think this will change.
This is the start of the Double Dip. Hang on. Its going to be fun going into it without any ability to cushion with stimuli and TARPs and stuff.
So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Maybe if people would look at this as BOTH sides fault instead of making it a partisan mess, something might get done.
Blaming both sides is looked down upon in American politics if not society. "You're with us or against us" has really hosed us up.
The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2009 was a spending request by President George W. Bush to fund government operations for October 2008-September 2009. Figures shown in this article do not reflect the actual appropriations by Congress for Fiscal Year 2009.
2009 is a BUSH year not an Obama year you farking liar.
toraque:A lot of factors are coming into alignment with the pre WW2 world.
--Rise of the far right in Europe, combined with increasing xenophobia --Global economic hardship, which provides a platform and cause for populist demagogues --From a link up above, massively increased political polarization in the US
There's still a lot missing, but it's looking a lot like a big throwdown of some kind in the next 10-15 years.
What increase in xenophobia? The Europeans hating Jews, Roma, and Moslems is nothing new. They're just not hiding it very well right now. Heck, the Albanians and Serbs are working back toward outright warfare in Kosovo right now, and neither of them can afford it, but the hate is strong in this one.
contrapunctus:If you think this fiasco was about anything other than a bunch of mentally challenged zealots sabotaging the entire process for their own political gain, then you're a sucker.
So which is it -- the Tea Party representatives are mentally disabled, or they're brilliant enough to sabotage the economy for their own evil ends? It sounds as if the Left can't even keep its poisonous misrepresentations straight any more. "Terrorists", "Nazis", "tards", "hostage- takers", etc. -- their foaming- at- the- mouth hysteria is rapidly escalating out of control.
The Dow plunged today mostly because of the worsening debt crisis in Europe, where governments have -- as in the US -- been wildly spending beyond their means for decades. The only difference is that in Europe there is no Tea Party to make into scapegoats, so they blame the bankers instead: anything to avoid facing the unpleasant reality that you can't keep borrowing forever to pay for all the goodies you want, whether at an individual or at a national level. But that is a fact that can only be acknowledged by reasonable people. The rest of you can get back to your moronic slavering about "teabaggers".
Kazan:The_Terminator: Keynesian economics only work when a World War destroys all major industrial powers and leaves America with the keys to the global economy.
nah.. it works fine when you're not buried in debt because the guy before you cut taxes and massively increased spending. Keynes basically said "Government spending can help stimulate an economy so it can climb out of a recession". our "Stimulus" was weaksauce shiat that didn't get maximum return for dollar spent (shiat like the WPA, etc is FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR more effective than tax cuts).
we were well on our way to climbing out of the hole before world war II started.
Keynesian economics break down when A) you're government is in deep debt due to bad fiscal policy during good times B) your citizens are in deep debt due to bad fiscal practices during good times
we have both A and B + ineffective forms of stimulus.
it isn't so much "Keynes was wrong" as it is "The effectiveness of Keynesian spending can be severely blunted by other factors".
I Said: Allies should get the gang back together and just bomb the life out of Germany
no... they shouldn't..
Therein lies the problem - Keynesians always claim that their ideologies were not put into practice perfectly enough.
The WPA and so forth were good for curing national malaise and put people to work, and from a psychological standpoint, I can see the appeal, and perhaps that reason alone made it good policy. However, true economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment), and the other powers' economies were annihilated.
The legacy of WWII was then this military industrial complex that we developed as a result of this association between war and growth. As I'm sure you know, killing the jobless rate by conscripting the public isn't true growth, nor is rationing of food and goods.
eggrolls:To quote Jon Stewart " Yes, we still have traffic lights... we're sorry! Not everybody defines freedom as the ability to not pay taxes! Government isn't perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gonefor it to stop growing at a race far outpacing GDP growth!"
2009 was a budget passed by Pelosi / Reid with a sitting in the wings Obama who also voted for it and pushed for it. So, yes it technically is "Bush'" budget but Obama asked for it and got it. I say split it 50/50.
With projected receipts less than projected outlays, the budget proposed by President Bush predicts a net deficit of approximately $400 billion dollars, adding to a United States governmental debt of about $11.4 trillion. Actual tax receipts totaled approximately $2.1 trillion - significantly less than the $2.7 trillion expected. The actual deficit in 2009 was $1.4 trillion.[1]
2009 was a BUSH BUGET year!! Stop lying!
According to your chart Obama BROUGHT DOWN THE DEFICIT YOU ASS!!!!
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
eudemonist:Kazan: my debt is currently higher than my yearly income, but i still have a nearly 800 credit score
You do know there's a difference between "GDP" and Federal revenues (i.e. "income"), right?
yes i do. personal finance and government aren't really analogous either. GDP is "how much the nation makes" and National Debt is "how much the nation owes". Taxes could be considered the part of your earnings you set aside for paying your debts in this analogy.
eggrolls:Seriously, because these tea party psychotics wouldn't be fully satisfied unless they actually destroyed the government, ruined the economy beyond recovery, and then retired to their walled compounds while they await the rapture as civilization shreds itself.
To quote Jon Stewart " Yes, we still have traffic lights... we're sorry! Not everybody defines freedom as the ability to not pay taxes! Government isn't perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gone!"
It's fun to create caricatures or political opponents.
They ran on the platform of balancing the budget and weren't going to vote for a debt increase unless there were serious provisions that led to a balanced budget. I don't know why people were surprised.
Obama put together a debt commission in 2010. It came back with some really good ideas that touched every area of the budget. It was ignored.
If they put in place those changes in 2010, the democrats would probably still control the congress and the economy would be in much better shape today.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
earthwirm:2009 was a budget passed by Pelosi / Reid with a sitting in the wings Obama who also voted for it and pushed for it. So, yes it technically is "Bush'" budget but Obama asked for it and got it. I say split it 50/50.
What?!?!? So Obama being a senator it was 50% his budget? Are you farking kidding me?
So then since The Republicans authored and passed the budget we are in now it's 50% their economy now too? Or does this system only work when it helps republicans?
The_Terminator:ue economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In other words, the fact that America massively increased deficit spending, directly or indirectly employing millions of Americans, and finally ending the Great Depression, proves Keynesian economics don't work.
Breaking windows will NOT reduce debt or stimulate the economy. Please tell me HOW the compromise actually took any money from anybody. The stock market dip proves that financial people are worried that not enough was done to control spending.
As far as increasing taxes, please explain how taxing corporations or unincorporated small business owners will encourage them to hire more people, and stimulate the economy. The only thing that might get the economy moving is to give business owners a long term guarantee that their taxes will not be raised. The threat of a tax increase, in the form of the end of the (extended) Bush tax cuts, is exactly what is strangling the economy at this moment.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
You're still on about the whole "messiah" thing, huh? Despite us not actually being happy.
The_Terminator: You imbeciles do realize that a large component of investor skittishness has to do with anticipation of the shiatty jobs reports coming out, right? ... cuts are needed now.
While it's pretty apparent that some combination of the job report and concerns over Spain/Italy caused the panic (and I say panic because they were both clearly coming for a long time), I'm missing the jump in conservative logic where massive cuts from the government leads to job creation. If anything the government should be spending more money, not less, if you place the collapse on jobs. Either funded by tax increases, or dumped exclusively into projects that we're going to have to pay for sometime in the next decade anyways (e.g. crumbling transportation infrastructure).
I don't necessarily agree with that being the solution, when screwed in multiple directions things are rarely that simple, but "It's jobs dummy" and "More cuts" don't fit in the same paradigm for approaching this. Many of the jobs actually lost where in local and state governments, which continue to shed jobs, while most other sectors are merely stalled.
toraque: A lot of factors are coming into alignment with the pre WW2 world.
--Rise of the far right in Europe, combined with increasing xenophobia --Global economic hardship, which provides a platform and cause for populist demagogues --From a link up above, massively increased political polarization in the US
There's still a lot missing, but it's looking a lot like a big throwdown of some kind in the next 10-15 years.
That's an interesting idea. Anyone have a reputable link to more Current/Pre WW2 comparisons?
sounds like we need to print more money to hand out to wall street. work so well last time.
obama is a biatch for not fighting for punishment and reform. but if he fought them that might make his class reunions awkward and they do give so much to his re-election fund.
the teabaggers are tards for thinking believing (they don't think) that deregulation is the answer or that unions are the cause of the problems and not the farking tards on wall street who produce nothing both fraudulent "wealth" and risk...
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
You folks are giving congress way too much credit. They are too dysfunctional to have the kind of power that could cause this. You want to place blame? Look no further than the Federal Reserve and one Alan Greenspan. He missed the boat way back in 2000 and stepped all over himself for the next 4 years. We still haven't gotten that mess sorted out and it's just getting worse.
patrick767:I agree that Obama could have negotiated better. On the other hand, it's difficult when one side, the GOP, is perfectly willing to drive the nation's economy off a cliff and the Democrats, rightfully so, are not.
But, you have to remember that Obama has encouraged hostage-taking behavior from the Republicans.
Every time Obama draws a line in the sand, he flips two weeks later and allows what he claimed he would NEVER allow -- even if it meant his presidency.
Remember the reports of Obama telling the Republicans not to call his bluff? He said he wouldn't yield. He would not accept a blueprint that was all budget cuts with no revenue increase.
Well, two weeks later, the Republicans called his bluff. He said he would yield. He said he would accept a blueprint that was all budget cuts.
And, quite frankly, who can blame the Republicans? If a negotiator has a history of blinking 100% of the time, what incentive does his opposition have to meet him half way? Why should they even meet him part of the way if history shows that in the end they can get everything they want if they just hold out long enough?
The reason it's a bad idea to give in to terrorists is that it encourages terroristic behavior. If you do give in, you might save the hostage currently being held...but, you're condemning dozens of other hostages to being pawns in the future.
People forget the 2009 omnibus signed by Obama, 2009 was year of Stimulus as well, the re-use of TARP funds to buy auto companies and a litany of other things. Obama wanted that budget.
Then Pelosi abstained in 2010 and GOP had to pass her budget a year later. That is why we have another budget vote up so soon, because the Dems FAILED to even do a budget.
PhysicsJunky:If anything the government should be spending more money, not less, if you place the collapse on jobs. Either funded by tax increases, or dumped exclusively into projects that we're going to have to pay for sometime in the next decade anyways (e.g. crumbling transportation infrastructure).
Government does not create anything. Government spends money, taking it out of the economy and killing jobs.
The_Terminator:Therein lies the problem - Keynesians always claim that their ideologies were not put into practice perfectly enough.
The WPA and so forth were good for curing national malaise and put people to work, and from a psychological standpoint, I can see the appeal, and perhaps that reason alone made it good policy. However, true economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment), and the other powers' economies were annihilated.
The legacy of WWII was then this military industrial complex that we developed as a result of this association between war and growth. As I'm sure you know, killing the jobless rate by conscripting the public isn't true growth, nor is rationing of food and goods.
the bolded section of your statement is completely incorrect. look at a GDP graph. and your first sentence is just an attempt at poisoning the well. please learn to debate logically.
eudemonist:eggrolls: To quote Jon Stewart " Yes, we still have traffic lights... we're sorry! Not everybody defines freedom as the ability to not pay taxes! Government isn't perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gone for it to stop growing at a race far outpacing GDP growth!"
Fixed for accuracy
wrong. fixed for inaccuracy. dumbass republicans have wanted to destroy government for years. remember "small enough to drown in a bathtub"... well except the parts of government that they want to use to force everyone else to conform to their flavor of christianity.
Holding the American economy hostage is ABSOLUTELY to blame for the start of the slide, and the GOP deserves the fallout it will most assuredly cause. They made their bed, shat in it, and now all of us get to sleep there for another 3 years again. While the teabaggers may not have directly caused the currently unfolding crash right now (as in, today), by being arrogant and focusing the world on themselves in a "look at me!" fit last week, a lot of traders missed the unravelling of Europe. The really REALLY serious problem now is that the banks, after buying their way into easy terms during the 2008 crisis via lobbying, all have lower liquid holdings requirements than they used to have. A LOT lower. For the most part, they are holding 3-4% of their bets in equity, and (for those who missed it) the market is down 4.5% today alone. Anyone holding long futures just got assraped.
Here's some predictions: If the jobs report sucks in the morning, tomorrow is a black Friday event in the making. Bank of America (among others) are SERIOUSLY screwed, and are about a margin call away from being Bear Sterns, only on a nuclear vs. conventional fallout sliding scale. The flight to cash has turned into a full panic now, and overnight we will be seeing fallout worldwide on every other market, probably all the way through to the open of the Dow in the morning, so futures are screwed and are utterly unpredictable. We're down 1000 pts. for a 9 day period, and this will be chicken feed by the end of next week. If people continue to freak out, we'll be at Dow 9k really soon now, having lost 1/4 of the wealth in the market (we're currently at 10% total loss already, btw, sitting at 11,5k).
The total value of the NYSE is 13.x Trillion dollars-ish, meaning that the last week has "disappeared" over a trillion dollars in wealth... in a WEEK.. which makes the "cut spending" debate look absolutely idiotic. A partisan argument by the tea party yielding 2Tn in cuts over 10 years has now led to over a TRILLION dollars in losses in about a week. Way to do math and stuff Republicans, jesus.
And the really stupid part is that its all about ideology to these people. They don't really get economics, but Rush/Hannity/Beck/some other loudmouthed, underqualified, self absorbed shill told them this shiat was a good idea.
People forget the 2009 omnibus signed by Obama, 2009 was year of Stimulus as well, the re-use of TARP funds to buy auto companies and a litany of other things. Obama wanted that budget.
Then Pelosi abstained in 2010 and GOP had to pass her budget a year later. That is why we have another budget vote up so soon, because the Dems FAILED to even do a budget.
DERP
You could actually present this better without seeming dumb.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
How can you just ignore reality like that?
I'm just a lurker so I haven't really investigated some of Fark's features, but I'm starting to favorite people. He's "farking liar" now.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you sticking by your lie. Trying to pretend the Bush Budget that was SIGNED BY BUSH AS PRESIDENT is some how "Obama's budget"?
Its probably a lot more important to look at the S&P, not the Dow. And my bet is that anxiousness about a double-dip USA recession and the deepening debt crisis in the Eurozone set off a panic button today. Hard to find a safe place to stash your moolah other than metals.
Well, good to see announcing this austerity program renewed the Almighty Market's faith in us, and brought the Confidence Fairy back to bless us with jobs, raises, economic growth, and free oral sex for everyone. I don't know how I could have ever doubted Reason and The Heritage Foundation on this; it all seems so silly now.
Kazan:the bolded section of your statement is completely incorrect. look at a GDP graph. and your first sentence is just an attempt at poisoning the well. please learn to debate logically.
GDP does not show the health of a country's economy. It is a horrible statistic.
If the Gov't spends tons and tons of money, the GDP goes up by definition. The rest of the public sector could be (would be) tanking and you could say oooh look 5% GDP growth!
captain_heroic44:The_Terminator: ue economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In other words, the fact that America massively increased deficit spending, directly or indirectly employing millions of Americans, and finally ending the Great Depression, proves Keynesian economics don't work.
SHAZAM!
You must be some fancy detective!
Yes, have virtually everyone employed by the military, and then have the rest of the world asplode, enabling America to effectively monopolize global production, and then claim that this one data point clearly proves that Keynesian theories of massive deficit spending are correct.
How did massive deficit spending work out for the Weimar Republic, btw?
I don't really understand all the hate about the "spending" cuts in the debt ceiling legislation. There are some triggers but most of them will problem simply be "phantom cuts" over the next 10 years since there is probably some way around the legislative triggers.
The rating agencies (who are also frequently full of it, see mortgage securities, and are by no means freaking economic oracles) wanted to 4 trillion in spending cuts (or revenue increases) over the next 10 years as a "good downpayment" to get back to fiscal health. We weren't able to come up with that.
This current market convulsion is not a reaction those paltry future spending cuts or even the tea party jackasses recent game of brinksmanship. This is the marker refocusing on our dismal economic fundamentals, i.e.:
Link (new window) US borrowing tops 100% of GDP: Treasury
I was not a fan of the level of tax cuts in ARRA (the stimulus bill) or that we let most of the bush tax cuts keep rolling along. Sure, we do need some more revenue. But we also need to cut spending, YES EVEN AT THIS POINT. The spending is just delaying the inevitable and you CANNOT keep doing it forever or we simply collapse on ourselves.
Eventually, the junkie has to pull the needle out and deal with the withdrawal symptoms.
///hell of a time to be a budget analyst here in DC
Penman:AdolfOliverPanties: Who the fark made this graph?
Uh, it says right there, the OMB made it.
It seems to be missing one very, very important footnote. Until FY 2010, the costs of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars were not included in budget deficit calculations (such as in that graph) because until that point they were funded almost entirely by emergency supplemental appropriation bills instead of regular appropriation bills. After the Obama administration came in, they made congress start funding the wars through regular appropriations bills which do apply against the budget deficit. If you were to take all of Iraq and Afghanistan spending that was done through emergency bills from 2001-2009 and add it to that graph, it would look very different.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
How can you just ignore reality like that?
The dimocrats took over both houses of congress in Jan 2007 you jackass.
alltandubh:contrapunctus: If you think this fiasco was about anything other than a bunch of mentally challenged zealots sabotaging the entire process for their own political gain, then you're a sucker.
So which is it -- the Tea Party representatives are mentally disabled, or they're brilliant enough to sabotage the economy for their own evil ends? It sounds as if the Left can't even keep its poisonous misrepresentations straight any more. "Terrorists", "Nazis", "tards", "hostage- takers", etc. -- their foaming- at- the- mouth hysteria is rapidly escalating out of control.
The Dow plunged today mostly because of the worsening debt crisis in Europe, where governments have -- as in the US -- been wildly spending beyond their means for decades. The only difference is that in Europe there is no Tea Party to make into scapegoats, so they blame the bankers instead: anything to avoid facing the unpleasant reality that you can't keep borrowing forever to pay for all the goodies you want, whether at an individual or at a national level. But that is a fact that can only be acknowledged by reasonable people. The rest of you can get back to your moronic slavering about "teabaggers".
I never suggested that there was any kind of strategic 'brilliance' on the part of the Teabagger politicians in the House; I have no idea where you got that from reading my previous post. On the contrary, they've revealed themselves to be the embodiment of everything we've seen from the myriad Teabagger rallies that have taken place since Obama took office: Cretinous, loud, and ignorant.
Politically appealing to the great unwashed segment of our population is no sign of intellect. Maybe in your world it is.
Somacandra:Its probably a lot more important to look at the S&P, not the Dow. And my bet is that anxiousness about a double-dip USA recession and the deepening debt crisis in the Eurozone set off a panic button today. Hard to find a safe place to stash your moolah other than metals.
The GOP holding the world economy hostage to score a few political points was not the sole cause. But it definitely added to the anxiety going into the week. McConnell, Boehner, and crew are not off the hook merely because there are other intervening causes.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
How can you just ignore reality like that?
The dimocrats took over both houses of congress in Jan 2007 you jackass.
So once again how does that make it an "Obama budget"?
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
Herr Sucht, was sucht du?? Deinem Kopf? Ich habe den gefunden, es ist im deinem arsch!
/sorry native german speakers.. it's been years since i was in high school /translation: Mr Sucht, what are you searching for? Your head? I have found it, it is in your ass! //sucht = suchen = german for "search"
The_Terminator:captain_heroic44: The_Terminator: ue economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In other words, the fact that America massively increased deficit spending, directly or indirectly employing millions of Americans, and finally ending the Great Depression, proves Keynesian economics don't work.
SHAZAM!
You must be some fancy detective!
Yes, have virtually everyone employed by the military, and then have the rest of the world asplode, enabling America to effectively monopolize global production, and then claim that this one data point clearly proves that Keynesian theories of massive deficit spending are correct.
How did massive deficit spending work out for the Weimar Republic, btw?
The economy was recovering before the world asploded, dude. The War Economy didn't exist until 1940. But the era of prosperity that follows was indeed because the rest of the world got blown to shiat.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
How can you just ignore reality like that?
The dimocrats took over both houses of congress in Jan 2007 you jackass.
So then right now we are in a REPUBLICAN ECONOMY because the current budget was written and passed by Republican majorities in both houses?
Obama is not responsible Republicans are. Or does this only work when when it makes Democrats look bad?
MugzyBrown:Kazan: the bolded section of your statement is completely incorrect. look at a GDP graph. and your first sentence is just an attempt at poisoning the well. please learn to debate logically.
GDP does not show the health of a country's economy. It is a horrible statistic.
If the Gov't spends tons and tons of money, the GDP goes up by definition. The rest of the public sector could be (would be) tanking and you could say oooh look 5% GDP growth!
it shows the total volume of the economy. we were growing very strongly by the time we entered world war II. i'm not saying WWII didn't provide a huge boost, i'm saying claimin that programs like the WPA, etc weren't already significantly helping is a load of shiat.
Most of the budget deficit increase was caused be revenues going down because of Bush's economic collapse. It had nothing to do with spending you liar.
Come on, you should be proud of your god. No one has collapsed an economy as well as he has. As Obama likes to say about his own incompetence, it is UNPRECEDENTED!
So you are going to ignore the fact that it was a BUSH budget for 2009 with a 1.4 TRILLION dollar deficit? And the his deficit was even more than Obama's?
How can you just ignore reality like that?
The dimocrats took over both houses of congress in Jan 2007 you jackass.
the charts says "Bush Years"
Was Bush no longer in office in 2008? Why does it say "Bush years" for 2007 then?
Yoyo:toraque: A lot of factors are coming into alignment with the pre WW2 world.
--Rise of the far right in Europe, combined with increasing xenophobia --Global economic hardship, which provides a platform and cause for populist demagogues --From a link up above, massively increased political polarization in the US
There's still a lot missing, but it's looking a lot like a big throwdown of some kind in the next 10-15 years.
What increase in xenophobia? The Europeans hating Jews, Roma, and Moslems is nothing new. They're just not hiding it very well right now. Heck, the Albanians and Serbs are working back toward outright warfare in Kosovo right now, and neither of them can afford it, but the hate is strong in this one.
Maybe a better way of saying it is 'Increasing public acceptance of xenophobia' I don't have any links handy, but that's been my takeaway from watching election after election where the 'unelectable' far right parties in Europe keep taking record percentages of the votes.
dustlesswalnut:Maybe it's not a good idea to base our economy on a farking casino that's run with no oversight.
it's cool the invisible hand will keep everything under control. and by invisible i mean the crony hands feeding money under the table to the well-connected so that they can remain wealthy and continue to "fabricate" wealth in the markets.
eggrolls:Seriously, because these tea party psychotics wouldn't be fully satisfied unless they actually destroyed the government, ruined the economy beyond recovery, and then retired to their walled compounds while they await the rapture as civilization shreds itself.
A perfect blend of idiocy and paranoia... and sad to say, utterly typical of the delusional ravings we've been seeing on Fark lately about the debt crisis. One- dimensional cartoon villains are plotting to destroy the economy by preaching fiscal austerity, while superheroes manage to thwart the villains' evil plans by borrowing trillions of dollars in debt that will never be paid back... this is lunacy.
Reading these threads has brought me to the understanding that there are many, many more mentally ill people out there in the world than is commonly realized.
The German DAX lost about 14% of its value this week, DJI lost about 7%. Way to go, GOP, you've officially proven that spending cuts during a recession is a farking stupid idea.
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
Now we're all going to suffer the consequences.
All my money's tied up in gold. Thanks, Glenn Beck!
toraque:Yoyo: toraque: A lot of factors are coming into alignment with the pre WW2 world.
--Rise of the far right in Europe, combined with increasing xenophobia --Global economic hardship, which provides a platform and cause for populist demagogues --From a link up above, massively increased political polarization in the US
There's still a lot missing, but it's looking a lot like a big throwdown of some kind in the next 10-15 years.
What increase in xenophobia? The Europeans hating Jews, Roma, and Moslems is nothing new. They're just not hiding it very well right now. Heck, the Albanians and Serbs are working back toward outright warfare in Kosovo right now, and neither of them can afford it, but the hate is strong in this one.
Maybe a better way of saying it is 'Increasing public acceptance of xenophobia' I don't have any links handy, but that's been my takeaway from watching election after election where the 'unelectable' far right parties in Europe keep taking record percentages of the votes.
Maybe I'm wrong. I hope I am.
I saw a spooky article anout the right wingers in greece out and about with masks and sticks the other day.
I hope I'm wrong, but it really looks like things are going to be getting even more ugly all over for a while.
The_Terminator:captain_heroic44: The_Terminator: ue economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In other words, the fact that America massively increased deficit spending, directly or indirectly employing millions of Americans, and finally ending the Great Depression, proves Keynesian economics don't work.
SHAZAM!
You must be some fancy detective!
Yes, have virtually everyone employed by the military, and then have the rest of the world asplode, enabling America to effectively monopolize global production, and then claim that this one data point clearly proves that Keynesian theories of massive deficit spending are correct.
How did massive deficit spending work out for the Weimar Republic, btw?
In all fairness, Hitler retained the Weimar Republic's economic model... the boom the Third Reich experienced a few years into Hitler's regime may very well have been the Wiemar era's policies bearing fruit.
most people who are not underclass will have a negative net worth at some point in their life.
For most of my life, and probably still, anything but a positive net worth was impossible for me because I never had any credit. When you never had credit and have no co-signer and have to get by on $674/mo. SSI you'd have to try really hard to get into debt legally. (And I'm not stupid enough to borrow money from illegal crooks.)
More than once I was refused an apartment because I failed a credit check, i.e. I failed to show up on the lists. I was accused of everything from writing my SSN down wrong to outright identity fraud, because obviously everybody who's a real person has to have a credit rating. The way they think no credit = no person.
That's right, I have NO debt. I don't owe anybody a penny. Suck it, bourgeois scum!
By the way: to quote the Bible, "Curse God and die!" [Job 2:9]
Fireproof:Welp, time to crack my neighbor's skull open and feast on the goo inside.
Remember to keep the bones; the marrow is an excellent source of energy, which you'll need plenty of for the high-impact world of death cults, improvised firearms, desert-conditions, and remarkably survivable bondage gear soon to come.
Kazan:yes i do. personal finance and government aren't really analogous either. GDP is "how much the nation makes" and National Debt is "how much the nation owes".
Ummm...strange way to define it. What do you mean by "nation"? Are you talking about the government, or the sum total each individual and company in the country? Generally when people say National Debt, they're talking about sovreign debt, the amount owed by the governement, and when they talk about "how much the nation (unless we change the sense in which we are using 'nation') makes", they're talking about government revenues. You seem to be conflating the two.
GDP is the total value of ALL the goods and services produced--very different from "what the U.S. Government makes/brings in each year" . Your little spiel equated it to "revenue", similar to how all the money you make (your yearly income) is your revenue. The comparison to "one year's worth of income" is less than useless, and potentially quite misleading. The only way it would be at all accurate is if the government instituted a 100% tax rate...if every single thing every American or American company produced, for a year, went to pay the debt.
They are actually quite analogous in many respects. One must simply keep their terms straight.
MugzyBrown:eggrolls: Seriously, because these tea party psychotics wouldn't be fully satisfied unless they actually destroyed the government, ruined the economy beyond recovery, and then retired to their walled compounds while they await the rapture as civilization shreds itself.
To quote Jon Stewart " Yes, we still have traffic lights... we're sorry! Not everybody defines freedom as the ability to not pay taxes! Government isn't perfect, but some people wish it was better, not gone!"
It's fun to create caricatures or political opponents.
They ran on the platform of balancing the budget and weren't going to vote for a debt increase unless there were serious provisions that led to a balanced budget. I don't know why people were surprised.
Obama put together a debt commission in 2010. It came back with some really good ideas that touched every area of the budget. It was ignored.
If they put in place those changes in 2010, the democrats would probably still control the congress and the economy would be in much better shape today.
They ran on a platform of gub'mint BAD, why should I pay taxes for things I don't understand?! Oh yeah, and our first priority is creating jobs (shhhhh... it's really to destroy Obama..don't tell anyone).
The debt commission came back with some good ideas, yes. Enacting a rise in the retirement age sounds great... to people who aren't 62 and about to vote. I saw the same idiocy last week in an ad hoc 'focus group' of ordinary citizens ABC news put together to solve the debt problem. Their answer? Raise the retirement age, cut government salaries and eliminate the nuclear arsenal. All high minded ideas that had NO impact on any of this group of people in their 30s.
Until people start realizing that these great plans may be great for them but absolutely crippling financially to large swaths of the American voting public nothing is ever gonna change. No one trusts anyone, no one believes anyone, everyone thinks (rightly) that they need to look out for number one, and nothing is EVER going to get better this way.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: So then right now we are in a REPUBLICAN ECONOMY because the current budget was written and passed by Republican majorities in both houses?
We have a current budget?
Yep was passed in april. Authored by Republicans and passed by majority votes from Republicans in both houses.
You think we are currently in a government shutdown?
On the plus side, in 6 weeks when this thing is hovering in the mid 8000s the republicans will have lost any hopes for the next decade or two. Might be able to swing a decent recovery up until they swoop in again and pillage us.
LincolnLogolas:The German DAX lost about 14% of its value this week, DJI lost about 7%. Way to go, GOP, you've officially proven that spending cuts during a recession is a farking stupid idea.
What part of "THERE ARE NO SPENDING CUTS IN THE DEBT CEILING BILL" do you not understand?
LincolnLogolas:The German DAX lost about 14% of its value this week, DJI lost about 7%. Way to go, GOP, you've officially proven that spending cuts during a recession is a farking stupid idea.
Admit it, you think spending cuts anytime is a farking stupid idea. If it's a day ending in 'y' we need more spending.
The_Terminator:captain_heroic44: The_Terminator: ue economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In other words, the fact that America massively increased deficit spending, directly or indirectly employing millions of Americans, and finally ending the Great Depression, proves Keynesian economics don't work.
SHAZAM!
You must be some fancy detective!
Yes, have virtually everyone employed by the military, and then have the rest of the world asplode, enabling America to effectively monopolize global production, and then claim that this one data point clearly proves that Keynesian theories of massive deficit spending are correct.
How did massive deficit spending work out for the Weimar Republic, btw?
Do you even have the vaguest sense of irony? I didn't argue that WW2 vindicates Keynesian economics. You argued that WW2 disproves or undermines Keynesian economics. Here, let me copy and paste what you said:
The WPA and so forth were good for curing national malaise and put people to work, and from a psychological standpoint, I can see the appeal, and perhaps that reason alone made it good policy. However, true economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment),
In response, I pointed out the unintentional irony of your remark, which consisted in arguing that a program of massive deficit spending helped contribute to the return to "true economic growth."
Do you see how saying that a successful deficit spending program contributed to true economic growth supports Keynesian economics rather than undermines it is different than arguing that WW2 vindicates Keynesian economics?
According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
This is the insanity of the right: They are calling a budget signed by President Bush an "Obama" budget and when confronted with that fact, they still will not admit they are wrong.
These people do not use reality to make decisions. All they do is except anything which makes Obama look bad as "fact".
Economic threads remind me of those videos from Parliaments in Asia where everyone is bickering, jumping at one another, throwing punches, and just plain general chaos.
OgreMagi:According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
Corvus:Yep was passed in april. Authored by Republicans and passed by majority votes from Republicans in both houses.
I'm pretty sure we got a continuing resolution (again). We never got a 2011 budget, let alone a 2012 budget. Things are severely farked up in DC right now.
WizardofToast:OgreMagi: According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
Poe's Law confounds me on this.
Shut up and get to Kristallnachting with the rest of the Dems. Mom and Pop!!! They are coming for your common sense family budget lifestyles!!!
I Said:This recent crisis was the DIRECT RESULT of the Tea Party and the GOP threatening to not allow the United States to meet its existing debt obligations.
Then why didn't it happen when anyone was actually threatening to do so? Furthermore, why did it then go ahead and happen when the crisis was already over? Logic isn't showing much in the way of a causal link here.
Kazan:wrong. fixed for inaccuracy. dumbass republicans have wanted to destroy government for years. remember "small enough to drown in a bathtub"... well except the parts of government that they want to use to force everyone else to conform to their flavor of christianity.
Yep, that whole "cut 1% per year in real spending" is totally equivalent to "destroy the government", right?
A Fark Handle:it's cool the invisible hand will keep everything under control. and by invisible i mean the crony hands feeding money under the table to the well-connected so that they can remain wealthy and continue to "fabricate" wealth in the markets.
I really don't get why so many companies go public. Groupon? Pandora? Why the fark do they need to be openly traded?
Oh well. I'm sure the drop will affect me somehow, and I'm sure I should care, but I really don't. I work for myself and don't have any investments or retirement plans. Fark it.
Kazan:The_Terminator: Therein lies the problem - Keynesians always claim that their ideologies were not put into practice perfectly enough.
The WPA and so forth were good for curing national malaise and put people to work, and from a psychological standpoint, I can see the appeal, and perhaps that reason alone made it good policy. However, true economic growth was not attained until the nation went to war (conscription and oiling the gears of war resulted in almost full employment), and the other powers' economies were annihilated.
The legacy of WWII was then this military industrial complex that we developed as a result of this association between war and growth. As I'm sure you know, killing the jobless rate by conscripting the public isn't true growth, nor is rationing of food and goods.
the bolded section of your statement is completely incorrect. look at a GDP graph. and your first sentence is just an attempt at poisoning the well. please learn to debate logically.
Last comment I'm going to make in this thread...
I'll remind you of the recession within the depression that occurred in 1938. This was largely due in part to the uncertainty created by the New Deal and the uncertainty it created with investors. Yes, GDP was increasing to some degree in the 30s, but it only surpassed the pre-1929 rate in 1937 at which point it never fully recovered until the start of WWII. The general trend was that this depression was going to continue indefinitely. The jobless rate (a lagging variable) never reflected the growth in GDP either because there was never any increase in production to match govt spending, and the labor pool was growing with the GDP, guaranteeing a prolonged depression absent the Second World War.
OgreMagi:According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
Most intelligent people knew that this was likely to happen if they pushed their economic-destuction agenda.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
[1.bp.blogspot.com image 480x360]
Actually it'd help a lot. First off, you get rid of the derp. Second off, you get rid of a lot of people on government assistance (social security and medicare).
Not that I'm suggesting killing the teabaggers but IT would help the economy.
OgreMagi:According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
Yes. they held the government hostage during the budget talks in April. They forced cuts that they even admitted would lose jobs they also added 700 BILLION to the deficit in a new round of tax cuts. Then after that the held the US hostage again for a further round of cuts. These cuts are losing jobs. That is a big reason the stock market is going down because we are pulling money out of the economy.
The US government was founded on the belief that people would compromise not say "You do what I say or we will plunge the economy of the united states!".
Corvus:This is the insanity of the right: They are calling a budget signed by President Bush an "Obama" budget and when confronted with that fact, they still will not admit they are wrong.
These people do not use reality to make decisions. All they do is except anything which makes Obama look bad as "fact".
As things are going, there's never going to be an "Obama budget". We're about to enter the third year of not having a budget because the Senate Democrats won't pass one.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
shoot the bankers and hedge fund managers instead. they are the problem.
the teabaggers are just misguide idiots that think a union firefighter that retires at 55 is "rich" so they attack them. the problem is the teabaggers don't even realize how rich the rich really are because they never see them.
I'll probably get flamed for this, not that I'm trolling for reactions here but, its time for this shiat to come down, the sooner the better. The sooner it happens the sooner we can stat formulating a rational solution insttead of doing this juggling act while pissing our future and our grandchildrens future further and further into debt.
At what point do democrats and republicans stop pointing fingers and admit that your percieved saviors have destroyed your economy. Tea Baggers and Obaminions alike... your searching for the best way to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not the party, its the government.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: Yep was passed in april. Authored by Republicans and passed by majority votes from Republicans in both houses.
I'm pretty sure we got a continuing resolution (again). We never got a 2011 budget, let alone a 2012 budget. Things are severely farked up in DC right now.
So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
be careful this is one of those things were you are about to prove that you have no farking clue what you are talking about.
jjorsett:Corvus: This is the insanity of the right: They are calling a budget signed by President Bush an "Obama" budget and when confronted with that fact, they still will not admit they are wrong.
These people do not use reality to make decisions. All they do is except anything which makes Obama look bad as "fact".
As things are going, there's never going to be an "Obama budget". We're about to enter the third year of not having a budget because the Senate Democrats won't pass one.
A budget was passed in April. Republicans even called it a "Budget bill"
It was authored by republican and passed by the senate mostly on Republican votes.
eudemonist:Kazan: wrong. fixed for inaccuracy. dumbass republicans have wanted to destroy government for years. remember "small enough to drown in a bathtub"... well except the parts of government that they want to use to force everyone else to conform to their flavor of christianity.
Yep, that whole "cut 1% per year in real spending" is totally equivalent to "destroy the government", right?
yeah because that's ACTUALLY what the republicans have been saying..
nope. pay attention to the last 30 years sometime.
The_Terminator:I'll remind you of the recession within the depression that occurred in 1938. This was largely due in part to the uncertainty created by the New Deal and the uncertainty it created with investors.
bullshiat, you have no farking idea what you're talking about. the little dip in GDP after strong GDP growth was started was caused by a minor scale back in the New Deal.
Mr Rusty Shackleford:jjorsett: Admit it, you think spending cuts anytime is a farking stupid idea. If it's a day ending in 'y' we need more spending.
Well jorset, that's how it worked all those years up until you were born and started listening to AM radio. Time to stop now?
You and your ilk are already spending my great-great-grandchildren's paychecks. I'm not going to sit passively while you work on looting my great-great-great-grandchildren.
LincolnLogolas:The German DAX lost about 14% of its value this week, DJI lost about 7%. Way to go, GOP, you've officially proven that spending cuts during a recession is a farking stupid idea.
If only because of the perception that it's bad. These stock markets fluctuate like this because of perception.
"Wild swings in share prices have more to do with the "lemming- like" behaviour of institutional investors than with the aggregate returns of the company they own." - Warren Buffet
Most intelligent people knew that this was likely to happen if they pushed their economic-destuction agenda.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
[1.bp.blogspot.com image 480x360]
Actually it'd help a lot. First off, you get rid of the derp. Second off, you get rid of a lot of people on government assistance (social security and medicare).
Not that I'm suggesting killing the teabaggers but IT would help the economy.
valar_morghulis:In all fairness, Hitler retained the Weimar Republic's economic model... the boom the Third Reich experienced a few years into Hitler's regime may very well have been the Wiemar era's policies bearing fruit.
Not to mention that a substantial portion of the Weimar Republic's deficit spending went to non-productive reparations payments. Hitler halted those payments, and invested the money in the country, which likely contributed to the boom you speak of.
This is all a result of Reagan's trickle down economics.
30 years later the banks and corporations control the economy and the politicians. The Rich keep getting richer and the middle class is withering away.
dustlesswalnut:I really don't get why so many companies go public. Groupon? Pandora? Why the fark do they need to be openly traded?
Selling off stock is an easy way to raise capital without A) going into debt, or B) giving away ownership of your company to some rich kid venture capitalists.
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
Now we're all going to suffer the consequences.
This.
The Tea Party hostage taking during the debt ceiling farce caused institutional investors to cash out $103 billion from US money market funds. This Tea Party bank run ranks larger (on a percentage basis) than what occurred during the Lehman Brothers collapse.of 2008. Link (new window)
The December 2007- December 2008 recession is the Bush Recession The October 2011 - March 2012 recession will be the Tea Party Recession
jjorsett:Corvus: This is the insanity of the right: They are calling a budget signed by President Bush an "Obama" budget and when confronted with that fact, they still will not admit they are wrong.
These people do not use reality to make decisions. All they do is except anything which makes Obama look bad as "fact".
As things are going, there's never going to be an "Obama budget". We're about to enter the third year of not having a budget because the Senate Democrats won't pass one.
Scores of House Republicans deserted their leadership to vote against the bill, which cut $38 billion in spending, saying it did not go far enough. As a result, Speaker John A. Boehner was forced to rely on large numbers of Democrats to pass the measure, which subsequently sailed through the Senate, 81 to 19. It went to President Obama for his signature.
jjorsett:You and your ilk are already spending my great-great-grandchildren's paychecks. I'm not going to sit passively while you work on looting my great-great-great-grandchildren.
Think twice about this. What if they turn out to be assholes?
SpyroChiro:I'll probably get flamed for this, not that I'm trolling for reactions here but, its time for this shiat to come down, the sooner the better. The sooner it happens the sooner we can stat formulating a rational solution insttead of doing this juggling act while pissing our future and our grandchildrens future further and further into debt.
At what point do democrats and republicans stop pointing fingers and admit that your percieved saviors have destroyed your economy. Tea Baggers and Obaminions alike... your searching for the best way to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not the party, its the government.
They will die pointing at each other.
When they are dead, if you try to move them, they will swing back into the blame position, like compass. Maybe we can find a way to generate energy off of that.
This is all a result of Reagan's trickle down economics.
[img810.imageshack.us image 500x378]
30 years later the banks and corporations control the economy and the politicians. The Rich keep getting richer and the middle class is withering away.
30 years later the banks and corporations control the economy and the politicians. One actor keeps getting shakier and another believes in giant sandworms.
Corvus:Shaggy_C: Corvus: Yep was passed in april. Authored by Republicans and passed by majority votes from Republicans in both houses.
I'm pretty sure we got a continuing resolution (again). We never got a 2011 budget, let alone a 2012 budget. Things are severely farked up in DC right now.
So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
be careful this is one of those things were you are about to prove that you have no farking clue what you are talking about.
What's the matter shaggy, you realize you already stepped in it?
Someone in this picture just made a lot of money when the market dropped 500 points. Maybe he could afford taking Obama and all the other guys out to lunch.
ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF, a fund that "takes a short position in long-dated government bonds."
I_C_Weener:WizardofToast: OgreMagi: According to the Fark Lefty Brigade, a small handful of Tea Party associated politicians, in reality not enough people to have any substantial power, held the entire world's economy hostage for their own personal gain. This is is repeat of pre-WW2 Germany when the Jews were blamed for everything bad. The hatred and death wishes are about the same, too. Let's hope we don't have the same results.
Poe's Law confounds me on this.
Shut up and get to Kristallnachting with the rest of the Dems. Mom and Pop!!! They are coming for your common sense family budget lifestyles!!!
I think you want 'night of the long knives' not 'Kristallnacht' there.
Saiga410:Step one is down I have already panicked. I am working on step two in that I have already brained the guy in the cubicle next to me and have proceeded to eat the gooey insides. But now I am panicking again because I cannot remember step 3..... I know 4 is profit but what is step threee.
Penman:Steve McQueen's Motorcycle: You cannot run deficits like we have been and have a 70,000+ page tax code and expect the country to stay solvent. It just won't happen.
Whoever said liberals were good with money?
How about deficit spending your way into two wars, while handing out blank checks to corporate interests, and allow those same corporate interests to pay less taxes than they would have twenty years ago?
Sounds to me like everyone who is a politician sucks with money. How about replacing them all with people who understand how the real world works? Or do you just want to keep running your retard tape of "it's all the libs' fault, derp de derp". Retard troll.
Most intelligent people knew that this was likely to happen if they pushed their economic-destuction agenda.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
[1.bp.blogspot.com image 480x360]
Actually it'd help a lot. First off, you get rid of the derp. Second off, you get rid of a lot of people on government assistance (social security and medicare).
Not that I'm suggesting killing the teabaggers but IT would help the economy.
Its okay when you do it.
Oh, I get it. My economic analysis of a insane plan posted on the internet that has no farking chance of being implemented is EXACTLY the same as holding the economy hostage and sending it back towards a recession. Great logic there.
Corvus:So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
SpyroChiro:I'll probably get flamed for this, not that I'm trolling for reactions here but, its time for this shiat to come down, the sooner the better. The sooner it happens the sooner we can stat formulating a rational solution insttead of doing this juggling act while pissing our future and our grandchildrens future further and further into debt.
At what point do democrats and republicans stop pointing fingers and admit that your perceived saviors have destroyed your economy. Tea Baggers and Obaminions alike... your searching for the best way to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not the party, its the government.
it's not the government it's the financial sector. it's twice as big as it should be and produces little of actual social worth. banks used to limit leverage, have decent underwriting standards, etc, but now it's just about stealing what you can before the game of hot potato ends. most derivatives should not not exist. investment houses should not be commercial banks. there was outright fraud. crimes have been committed. that's were the problem is.
but since they own the government nothing is going to happen to them...they just keep stealing generations of wealth. fark it...
Shaggy_C:Selling off stock is an easy way to raise capital without A) going into debt, or B) giving away ownership of your company to some rich kid venture capitalists.
Kazan:yeah because that's ACTUALLY what the republicans have been saying..
Umm...yeah, that actually IS what the Republicans are saying.
nope. pay attention to the last 30 years sometime.
The original quote was in reference to "tea party psychotics", who haven't been around for quite thirty years yet.
The problem with politics today is that the establishment has convinced people that folks on the other side of an issue are either stupid or evil. You've fallen for it.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
Right then according to you congress NEVER passed a budget before 1974 then?
jjorsett:You and your ilk are already spending my great-great-grandchildren's paychecks. I'm not going to sit passively while you work on looting my great-great-great-grandchildren.
I've paid nearly $1m in taxes since 2000. You're welcome.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
THE BACK PEDALING HAS COMMENCED!!!!
Yes there is a formal process. Just because it doesn't follow that formal process does not mean it is not a budget bill!
A Fark Handle:SpyroChiro: I'll probably get flamed for this, not that I'm trolling for reactions here but, its time for this shiat to come down, the sooner the better. The sooner it happens the sooner we can stat formulating a rational solution insttead of doing this juggling act while pissing our future and our grandchildrens future further and further into debt.
At what point do democrats and republicans stop pointing fingers and admit that your perceived saviors have destroyed your economy. Tea Baggers and Obaminions alike... your searching for the best way to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not the party, its the government.
it's not the government it's the financial sector. it's twice as big as it should be and produces little of actual social worth. banks used to limit leverage, have decent underwriting standards, etc, but now it's just about stealing what you can before the game of hot potato ends. most derivatives should not not exist. investment houses should not be commercial banks. there was outright fraud. crimes have been committed. that's were the problem is.
but since they own the government nothing is going to happen to them...they just keep stealing generations of wealth. fark it...
And repealing important parts of Glass-Steagall is probably what inflated it. It at least contributed.
Corvus:Shaggy_C: Corvus: So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
THE BACK PEDALING HAS COMMENCED!!!!
Yes there is a formal process. Just because it doesn't follow that formal process does not mean it is not a budget bill!
Can you guys get a room. The rest of us would like to talk about our plans to build Mad Max style road machines and whether or not we should be raiding for oil, gas, gold, or plastics.
this is the "Iraq/GWOT doesn't count for the budget" version of the budget being cited for Bush, i'd imagine, right?
Well it is counting 2009 fiscal year which was passed under Bush an "Obama budget". Which is a total lie.
Will you farking settle down. Yes the budget signed by Bush projected a $400 Billion deficit for 2009 so we can attribute that to him. But the $787 Billion stimulus was passed in 2009, the $410 million omnibus spending bill was passed in 2009, the bailout of auto makers for $80 billion was passed in 2009 and there were other spending bill passed in 2009 and signed by PBO (cash for clunkers, anyone) that were outside of the approved budget for 2009 that Bush signed.
I_C_Weener:Can you guys get a room. The rest of us would like to talk about our plans to build Mad Max style road machines and whether or not we should be raiding for oil, gas, gold, or plastics.
I_C_Weener:Corvus: Shaggy_C: Corvus: So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
THE BACK PEDALING HAS COMMENCED!!!!
Yes there is a formal process. Just because it doesn't follow that formal process does not mean it is not a budget bill!
Can you guys get a room. The rest of us would like to talk about our plans to build Mad Max style road machines and whether or not we should be raiding for oil, gas, gold, or plastics.
When talking Mad Max, if you don't include lead on the list, you're part of the problem...
Buffalo77:Will you farking settle down. Yes the budget signed by Bush projected a $400 Billion deficit for 2009 so we can attribute that to him. But the $787 Billion stimulus was passed in 2009, the $410 million omnibus spending bill was passed in 2009, the bailout of auto makers for $80 billion was passed in 2009 and there were other spending bill passed in 2009 and signed by PBO (cash for clunkers, anyone) that were outside of the approved budget for 2009 that Bush signed.
I_C_Weener:Corvus: Shaggy_C: Corvus: So then the US Government never had a budget before 1974?
The law changed in 1974. Now, there is a formal definition for the official Federal Budget of the United States. There is a specific process that the official budget has to go through. As we have not gone through that process and the bill passed is a continuing resolution and not the official Federal Budget of the United States, by law it is not the budget. It may be a de facto budget, as it provides funding for the government, but it's not the same thing as a normal budget like we have had every year since 1974.
THE BACK PEDALING HAS COMMENCED!!!!
Yes there is a formal process. Just because it doesn't follow that formal process does not mean it is not a budget bill!
Can you guys get a room. The rest of us would like to talk about our plans to build Mad Max style road machines and whether or not we should be raiding for oil, gas, gold, or plastics.
Personally, I'm looking to take over a Kroger's warehouse. Food and domestic items means I can trade for gas and oil. The rich can keep the shiny rocks, lead will be more of a bargaining chip, especially coming out of a gun barrel.
Corvus:Right then according to you congress NEVER passed a budget before 1974 then?
The law was different then you idiot. The budget was an ad hoc procedure each year, which was untenable and led to the passage of the law which created a formal definition for the budget and the budget process. So you are referring to "the budget" using arcane 1960s terminology to try to prove your point. Epic fail. Just look at the official name of the so-called "budget" you are talking about from April: H.R.1473 -- Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
Compare that to 2008, where we had an official budget - H.R.2764 -- Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
Continuing resolution is not the same thing as a formal budget. Sorry, we're not in 1973 any more. You're simply wrong.
This is all a result of Reagan's trickle down economics.
[img810.imageshack.us image 500x378]
30 years later the banks and corporations control the economy and the politicians. The Rich keep getting richer and the middle class is withering away.
and don't forget the firing of the air traffic controllers which destroyed unions in america. and without a labor movement wages have stagnated while productivity and income inequality have risen dramatically. and the funny thing about that is that it was not reagan intention to attack unions in general. he believed in unions and thought that the right to organize was an important democratic right. (and even was the head of a union once) instead he just wanted to punish that particular union for staging an illegal strike. of course the republican have shifted so far right that they now don't believe unions should exist. what the fark?
/i'm pretty sure reagan would be a blue dog democrat these days //could be completely talking out of my ass with that statement
So, gas prices should follow. The reduction in usage by folks cutting back will be slighlty offset by the worldwide rise in molotovs but not enough to keep you form seeing some savings at the pump.
Most intelligent people knew that this was likely to happen if they pushed their economic-destuction agenda.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
This wasn't caused by the Tea Partiers getting what they wanted. It was caused by them failing to get what they wanted--meaningful deficit reduction.
Neither Obama nor the Democratic nor Republican leadership has shown that they are serious about bringing government spending under control. This is the market's natural reaction to that.
clambot:Two gentlemen today at the office held a debate for 15 minutes within full earshot of my cubicle.
Resolved: Our economic troubles today are a direct result of FDR's "BIG DEAL."
They referred to the New Deal consistently throughout their discussion as...the BIG DEAL.
Sheeeeeesh. Is this some sort of secret code shared by idiotlogues of a certain leaning?
Thank God for earbuds. I had to tune that shiat out after a few minutes.
They must know jim_paul, who pointed out yesterday that GDP is just "shorthand" for "stuff" that "people who know what they're talking about" use instead of real words.
When will people learn. The politicians are not there for us. They are there because it's a status symbol to have that spot. Obama was rich before he took the top spot and he'll be rich after. He does not care about us.
devildog123:So, on Fark, when the market crashed with a Republican President and a Democratic Congress... It's the President's fault, when the market crashes with a Democratic President and a half Republican Congress... It's Congress' fault.
Debt during economic good times is idiotic. Debt during downturns is necessary as a part of the countercyclical action government can take to reduce the strength of a recession. Anyone who instinctively thinks all debt is wrong all the time is an idiot. When the situation changes, our response changes as well.
eudemonist:Kazan: yeah because that's ACTUALLY what the republicans have been saying..
Umm...yeah, that actually IS what the Republicans are saying.
nope. pay attention to the last 30 years sometime.
The original quote was in reference to "tea party psychotics", who haven't been around for quite thirty years yet.
The problem with politics today is that the establishment has convinced people that folks on the other side of an issue are either stupid or evil. You've fallen for it.
the establishment hasn't convinced me of shiat. i've observed the tea party myself plenty. i've observed post-2000 republicans plenty.
1980s republicans were silly ideologues who shiat on the poor 1990s republicans were childish asshats who impeached a president over a blow job because they had nothing on him 2000s republicans were spend-like-drunken-sailors trickle-down dipshiats that doubled our national debt. and were intolerable christian supremacist farktards 2010s republicans are unamerican shiats who should be forcibly ejected
(and democrats are ineffective ninnies who have let the republicans walk over them for 30 years and have moved right thinkin that because the republicans did so, so should them. )
mr_plithers:"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America 's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government can not pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America 's debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, "the buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better."
- Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006
Yeah, he was saying that the war spending was out of control. It was. It is.
The answer isn't to stop paying our bills and cease all social services. The social services didn't get us in this mess, the wars did.
Now I'd love for him to come out today and say "we're pulling our troops out of all foreign conflicts," however I'd also like to see him get elected again in 2012, so I understand that that's not going to happen.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: Right then according to you congress NEVER passed a budget before 1974 then?
The law was different then you idiot. The budget was an ad hoc procedure each year, which was untenable and led to the passage of the law which created a formal definition for the budget and the budget process. So you are referring to "the budget" using arcane 1960s terminology to try to prove your point. Epic fail. Just look at the official name of the so-called "budget" you are talking about from April: H.R.1473 -- Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011
Compare that to 2008, where we had an official budget - H.R.2764 -- Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008.
Continuing resolution is not the same thing as a formal budget. Sorry, we're not in 1973 any more. You're simply wrong.
So? Where does it say one is a budget bill and one is not?
they are both budget acts. they are just different kinds. Everyone called the CA that passed a "Budget bill" even Republicans.
Most intelligent people knew that this was likely to happen if they pushed their economic-destuction agenda.
I want to shoot every tea-party "Patriot" I see, now.
This wasn't caused by the Tea Partiers getting what they wanted. It was caused by them failing to get what they wanted--meaningful deficit reduction.
Neither Obama nor the Democratic nor Republican leadership has shown that they are serious about bringing government spending under control. This is the market's natural reaction to that.
I'd agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Tackling the deficit without increasing revenues i will not work. Obama and the Democrats put forward a $4B plan that included that as well as entitlement reform and the Tea Party caucus refused.
Mouser:Neither Obama nor the Democratic nor Republican leadership has shown that they are serious about bringing government spending under control. This is the market's natural reaction to that.
No, this was the market's natural reaction to the failure of the US to raise tax rates on its wealthiest. Increase the tax rates on the wealthy and they need to invest more to avoid the tax increase and stop hoarding.
No tax increase, no investment, more hoarding. Econ 101.
You know me; I'm a rabid anti-semantite. But the fact of the matter is there was never an official 2011 budget passed per the legal definition that requires a specific order of steps in the budget process.
I don't even get why we're having this big argument, we're on the same side of the broader issue.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: Stop trying to play this semantics game.
You know me; I'm a rabid anti-semantite. But the fact of the matter is there was never an official 2011 budget passed per the legal definition that requires a specific order of steps in the budget process.
I don't even get why we're having this big argument, we're on the same side of the broader issue.
Because you said something stupid like you usually do and I called you out on it.
Show me where it says Continuing Resolutions (that are signed into law) are no longer "budget bills". Was it part of the 1974 law?
You must of read it somewhere right or did you just make it up?
eraser8:Thanks for caving to the Republicans again, Obama.
They've managed to get you to go along with wrecking the economy and laying the groundwork for destroying the social safety net. Congratulations, Mr. President..
Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
A Fark Handle:SpyroChiro: I'll probably get flamed for this, not that I'm trolling for reactions here but, its time for this shiat to come down, the sooner the better. The sooner it happens the sooner we can stat formulating a rational solution insttead of doing this juggling act while pissing our future and our grandchildrens future further and further into debt.
At what point do democrats and republicans stop pointing fingers and admit that your perceived saviors have destroyed your economy. Tea Baggers and Obaminions alike... your searching for the best way to re-arrange the deck chairs on the Titanic. It's not the party, its the government.
it's not the government it's the financial sector. it's twice as big as it should be and produces little of actual social worth. banks used to limit leverage, have decent underwriting standards, etc, but now it's just about stealing what you can before the game of hot potato ends. most derivatives should not not exist. investment houses should not be commercial banks. there was outright fraud. crimes have been committed. that's were the problem is.
but since they own the government nothing is going to happen to them...they just keep stealing generations of wealth. fark it...
I can certainly agree with that statement. However, if the government did not exist, this whole charade would not be possible... the financial sector would have simply failed and more sturdy businesses would have come from the ashes.
/Yes im suggesting the world is better off without government //flame on, it's happened before
nekulor:The EU is about to enter a spiraling debt crisis worse than our own, which is why the markets sank. You know what else had this kind of lead-up? WWII.
WWII? Wait, in that case who would be the... oh. OH! right, They'd be that... but then who's going to be the... oh dear, that isn't very good, not very good at all.
/have fun filling in the blanks, y'all. //also, Are we yet into the territory of sep 29th, 2008, when the Dow tanked an insatiable 777.68? No? great, wake me when it's the biggest drop of the last five years. ///actually, really just wake me if we brake any of the thresholds, that's something worth panicking about.
By next thursday, things will be back to normal and the news will have something different to follow. /but please, continue to think we're headed toward oblivion. Sell your stocks so I can buy them low.
You don't know even have a basic understanding of the current global economy. From China to Japan to Europe to US, the world is full of bubbles waiting to burst.
Shaggy_C:Corvus: Stop trying to play this semantics game.
You know me; I'm a rabid anti-semantite. But the fact of the matter is there was never an official 2011 budget passed per the legal definition that requires a specific order of steps in the budget process.
I don't even get why we're having this big argument, we're on the same side of the broader issue.
Tell us why did they pass the 1974 law?
Explain to us the legality of the difference of the two. Not how they are passed but what the difference is on spending money. Basically what is this difference on how they work as a "budget"?
jayphat:Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Do you know what the poverty rate for the elderly was before social security's inception? Around half. The poor lived in a Dickensian nightmare where they had to work under truly dangerous conditions if they wanted to eat that night. The idea that a world like that would be *preferable* to you compared to one where a small proportion of slobs take advantage of the system makes you, frankly, a piece of sh*t.
Delay:Mouser: Neither Obama nor the Democratic nor Republican leadership has shown that they are serious about bringing government spending under control. This is the market's natural reaction to that.
No, this was the market's natural reaction to the failure of the US to raise tax rates on its wealthiest. Increase the tax rates on the wealthy and they need to invest more to avoid the tax increase and stop hoarding.
No tax increase, no investment, more hoarding. Econ 101.
Huh. I guess I missed that econ 101 course because it's NOTHING like what the real world is. Most of these companies are sitting on their capital because they have no farking idea what congress and the president are going to do. Go one way or the other, please, and they'll do something. Just sit and talk about raising/lowering taxes, they're just gonna sit on their capital and wait it out.
By next thursday, things will be back to normal and the news will have something different to follow. /but please, continue to think we're headed toward oblivion. Sell your stocks so I can buy them low.
You don't know even have a basic understanding of the current global economy. From China to Japan to Europe to US, the world is full of bubbles waiting to burst.
The China one is, IMHO the most scary of all.
It's unbelieveable how much they have built and are still building, yet the prices keep going up. They seem to think that holding on to empty apartments and releasing them at a trickle is somehow going to stop the inevatable.
You destroyed the Dow Jones, European Union and entire world economy by saying bad, mean things on TV.
DAMN YOU!!!
Santelli had little to do with it.
Rather, it was conservative ideology. In particular, the faith in deregulation as a means of achieving economic growth. Deregulating the financial sector may have bought some short term gains. But the abuses deregulation permitted were catastrophic, and the proximate cause of the recession. Republicans passed the bill. And Clinton signed it. But make no mistake it was conservative ideology that led to it.
To the extent Santelli might be regarded as a contributing cause to the Tea Party, he may be regarded as a remote contributing cause to today's stock market dip. I.e., Santelli rant crystalizes Tea Party sentiment----->Tea Party Forms----->Tea Party holds global economy hostage to score political points---->Investor anxiety increases---->Intervening causes increase investor anxiety more---->today's stock market dip.
But for my money, that causal chain is far too attenuated to give Santelli much credit. He's just not that important.
jayphat:Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Steak and shrimp? On foodstamps? My family was on them from the time I was in kindergarten through the 8th grade, and I can assure you we could never afford steak and shrimp with them.
Also, it is quite atypical. Ever had to go wait in line to get your stamps? I went with my mom more months than not, and ~60% of the people in line were elderly, and the rest were young women.
Senescent Dawn expresses my thoughts on you perfectly:
jayphat:Huh. I guess I missed that econ 101 course because it's NOTHING like what the real world is. Most of these companies are sitting on their capital because they have no farking idea what congress and the president are going to do. Go one way or the other, please, and they'll do something. Just sit and talk about raising/lowering taxes, they're just gonna sit on their capital and wait it out
More likely companies are sitting on their capital because low demand doesn't justify increasing production. Low inflation, especially, makes it more rational to hold onto money than risk spending it for what the demand curve says will be low returns.
If only there were some way to increase demand and spur mild inflation at the same time...
meh. Today was nothing. The market was nice to Obama because it is his birthday. Just wait till tomorrow.
All the economic numbers are being adjusted downward. 9% unemployment is now a floor, not a ceiling. The summer of recovery of last year has done nothing. Obama has been "laser focused" on getting folks their jobs back for the last 20 months and NOTHING has happened (good speeches though!). He has declared his class war on the rich, the wall street guys, the hedge fund managers and those corporate jets (gee, maybe they want to take their money out of the market for a while. or do you think this decline was due to poor people selling their 401ks?)
Delay:Mouser: Neither Obama nor the Democratic nor Republican leadership has shown that they are serious about bringing government spending under control. This is the market's natural reaction to that.
No, this was the market's natural reaction to the failure of the US to raise tax rates on its wealthiest. Increase the tax rates on the wealthy and they need to invest more to avoid the tax increase and stop hoarding.
No tax increase, no investment, more hoarding. Econ 101.
you act like teatards CARE about econ 101. Facts are not important to those idiots, although one does have to admire their dedication to being stupid.
And let's not forget: at ANY time, Boehner could have reached across the aisle and gotten enough Democratic votes to pass a sensible bill. He chose to insist on a bill that only Republicans would vote for.
Yeah, the Tea Baggers...blame that small minority who has been holding office for all of a few years, deffinately their fault that the government and economy are FUBAR. You are a farking moron
Remember they own the debt ceiling deal and now I've read further down the thread and it's been pointed out that this could be about the jobs report and most certainly the Europeon economic crisis. Also I'm not a moron for having a possibly inaccurate viewpoint.
Yes, you are a moron. You are the reason the country is so politically divided. You blindly blame a minority of politicians who have been in office a couple years for something that has been coming to a head for decades.
Senescent Dawn:jayphat: Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Do you know what the poverty rate for the elderly was before social security's inception? Around half. The poor lived in a Dickensian nightmare where they had to work under truly dangerous conditions if they wanted to eat that night. The idea that a world like that would be *preferable* to you compared to one where a small proportion of slobs take advantage of the system makes you, frankly, a piece of sh*t.
Do you know what our "poor" enjoy today? Seriously, go look it up. What we describe as our poor own a car, 3 televisions, a game system, a computer, a cell phone, fridge, microwave, etc etc. This net has grown to build a lifestyle for people. That's not the job of the federal government. Its to keep people from dying, while allowing the individual to better themselves through hard work and a drive for a better lifestyle. But hey, let's keep spending money out the ass so that everyone gets to live on the same level, right?
In other news, Bitcoin is up 18.04% today. It's almost like an inflation-proof bomb-proof crack-proof congressman-proof distributed unstoppable cash-like digital currency is safer than traditional currencies and their derivatives.
/btw, gold is doing jack shiat //not an ad. it's just interesting since Bitcoin has been stagnant for a while.
brukmann:In other news, Bitcoin is up 18.04% today. It's almost like an inflation-proof bomb-proof crack-proof congressman-proof distributed unstoppable cash-like digital currency is safer than traditional currencies and their derivatives.
/btw, gold is doing jack shiat //not an ad. it's just interesting since Bitcoin has been stagnant for a while.
dustlesswalnut:jayphat: Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Steak and shrimp? On foodstamps? My family was on them from the time I was in kindergarten through the 8th grade, and I can assure you we could never afford steak and shrimp with them.
Also, it is quite atypical. Ever had to go wait in line to get your stamps? I went with my mom more months than not, and ~60% of the people in line were elderly, and the rest were young women.
Senescent Dawn expresses my thoughts on you perfectly:
ramblinwreck: Johnny Bananapeel: [i.imgur.com image 450x535]
*sigh*...another chart with the "Bush years" incorrectly labeled.
/hint - move the blue column over one to the right
Its all done throughout a card system in most states now. I worked for one or those "evil retail giants" for too long and trust me when I say thus, the definitions of what you can buy with that card is fiscal insanity now. Why do you think so many people in new York biatched about the fact they wanted to create a "soda tax" to encourage healthy eating but refused to take it off the food stamp eligible item list.
Personally, I would like to see SNAP go to a WIC type system. You are alloted to by X amount of cereal, Y amount of dairy, etc to weed out this waste.
jayphat:Do you know what our "poor" enjoy today? Seriously, go look it up. What we describe as our poor own a car, 3 televisions, a game system, a computer, a cell phone, fridge, microwave, etc etc. This net has grown to build a lifestyle for people. That's not the job of the federal government. Its to keep people from dying, while allowing the individual to better themselves through hard work and a drive for a better lifestyle. But hey, let's keep spending money out the ass so that everyone gets to live on the same level, right?
You're begrudging people a fridge and a microwave? I suppose you're the kind of person who enjoys driving past shantytowns in your Lexus. Don't fool yourself -- a poor life is an austere life. Just because some of them drop $50 dollars for a used XBox is not evidence for living high on the hog.
The whole issue is a red herring anyway. Dolts like you LOVE to trot out the "welfare queen" argument as what's wrong with the country's budgetary outlook, but as a proportion of federal spending, welfare ranks quite low. And the proportion of people who don't truly need it is even lower. Obviously, it's important that we have a drive to succeed, but a basic standard of human living in the richest country on Earth is not a bad thing.
I'm moving to Australia in 5 days! Look what you made me do America...
Incidentally, I'm at my mom's overseeing the guy installing a new furnace and he managed to work in a rant about immigrants taking jobs, Obama, overspending, being owned by the Chinese, and then griped about govt. over-regulation of his industry followed by lamenting the fact that he has to work around asbestos but if he was concerned about safety his company would just find someone else and he has kids to feed. He also spent a half hour in the basement screaming at his wife and swearing. The convo included references to divorce papers and his disciplining of one of his kids for spilling juice on the counter the other night. CSB.
*shrug* I've been reading the markets like a book this year, just went short on energy this week (cha-ching). Always a way to make money in any market.
..and the debt ceiling had very little to do with this. Europe has a larger economy than the US, and its rapidly approaching a 2008 style melt down. That, combined with the fact that newly revised economic numbers came out this week indicating that the US economy has in fact stalled, and has not been growing as previously thought.
I've been calling this shiat for months though... buy into the markets in a few weeks on the bounce.
dustlesswalnut:brukmann: In other news, Bitcoin is up 18.04% today. It's almost like an inflation-proof bomb-proof crack-proof congressman-proof distributed unstoppable cash-like digital currency is safer than traditional currencies and their derivatives.
/btw, gold is doing jack shiat //not an ad. it's just interesting since Bitcoin has been stagnant for a while.
Wasn't there a hack just a month or two ago that caused a drop in value of about 50%? (new window)
jayphat:Senescent Dawn: jayphat: Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Do you know what the poverty rate for the elderly was before social security's inception? Around half. The poor lived in a Dickensian nightmare where they had to work under truly dangerous conditions if they wanted to eat that night. The idea that a world like that would be *preferable* to you compared to one where a small proportion of slobs take advantage of the system makes you, frankly, a piece of sh*t.
Do you know what our "poor" enjoy today? Seriously, go look it up. What we describe as our poor own a car, 3 televisions, a game system, a computer, a cell phone, fridge, microwave, etc etc. This net has grown to build a lifestyle for people. That's not the job of the federal government. Its to keep people from dying, while allowing the individual to better themselves through hard work and a drive for a better lifestyle. But hey, let's keep spending money out the ass so that everyone gets to live on the same level, right?
If being poor is so farking great, why don't you try supporting a family on $20,000 a year, then report back to us.
Kar98:A Fark Handle: /i'm pretty sure reagan would be a blue dog democrat these days //could be completely talking out of my ass with that statement
"...where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost." --Ronald Reagan, Labor Day Address at Liberty State Park, 1980
Your move.
doesn't that quote support of my statement? compared to the tools in the gop/teabag now reagan was rational and moderate. he even raised taxes when he saw that the debt was growing too fast. and did support unions. unlike lots of the teatards and gop now who want to ban unions...yeah, i'm pretty sure reagan would be a dem. now that's sad...
/what the fark happened to you america? you use to be decent.
Little.Alex:On the plus side; unless the Republicans nominate Sarah Palin, Obama lost the election yesterday.
Good riddance to exceptional corruption and incompetence.
[www.stopliberallies.com image 395x300]
Bachmann, Gingrich, Cain and Santorum are also bad choices. I think we got another 2004 at hand: Terrible president, even more terrible opponent presidential candidates.
jayphat:Its all done throughout a card system in most states now. I worked for one or those "evil retail giants" for too long and trust me when I say thus, the definitions of what you can buy with that card is fiscal insanity now. Why do you think so many people in new York biatched about the fact they wanted to create a "soda tax" to encourage healthy eating but refused to take it off the food stamp eligible item list.
Personally, I would like to see SNAP go to a WIC type system. You are alloted to by X amount of cereal, Y amount of dairy, etc to weed out this waste.
Yeah, and in Detroit they had to have the major ATM manufacturers modify their ATMs so the cards wouldn't let you withdrawl cash at a casino ATM.
There will always be moochers, there will always be the "worst" users of a safety net system.
Do the people that really need the net deserve to smash into the ground at terminal velocity because you don't like that a few people gamed the system?
That's certainly not a world I want to live in. I might not be alive today if it weren't for the "social safety net".
A Fark Handle:Kar98: A Fark Handle: /i'm pretty sure reagan would be a blue dog democrat these days //could be completely talking out of my ass with that statement
"...where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost." --Ronald Reagan, Labor Day Address at Liberty State Park, 1980
Your move.
doesn't that quote support of my statement?
Yes, it does. Sorry, I didn't mean to give the impression I was arguing against your point. Let's make out.
tenpoundsofcheese:meh. Today was nothing. The market was nice to Obama because it is his birthday. Just wait till tomorrow.
All the economic numbers are being adjusted downward. 9% unemployment is now a floor, not a ceiling. The summer of recovery of last year has done nothing. Obama has been "laser focused" on getting folks their jobs back for the last 20 months and NOTHING has happened (good speeches though!). He has declared his class war on the rich, the wall street guys, the hedge fund managers and those corporate jets (gee, maybe they want to take their money out of the market for a while. or do you think this decline was due to poor people selling their 401ks?)
Yes, we got change.
CHANGE IT BACK!!
Well the economy was picking up during the stimulus. Then in April the Republican budget bill made cuts pulling money from the economy and losing jobs. And now that we have another round of cuts and the Bush tax cut extensions adding to the deficit many companies are now uncertain about the future.
When the majority Leader Boehner says he wants to make cuts and doesn't care about how many jobs get lost it sends shock waves through the economy.
dustlesswalnut:brukmann: In other news, Bitcoin is up 18.04% today. It's almost like an inflation-proof bomb-proof crack-proof congressman-proof distributed unstoppable cash-like digital currency is safer than traditional currencies and their derivatives.
/btw, gold is doing jack shiat //not an ad. it's just interesting since Bitcoin has been stagnant for a while.
Wasn't there a hack just a month or two ago that caused a drop in value of about 50%? (new window)
There was a hack of the main exchange website. Had nothing at all to do with the security of the coin itself. It's as if someone cracked a banking computer and made an entry for millions of dollars that didn't exist. He made off with a few thousand dollars, which the exchange covered. Security at that site is obviously much better now.
Bitcoin, as an open standard, doesn't try to secure your data for you in the current code. It allows for effectively perfect security between secure computers, but the endpoints will always be the weak link. But then again, if you're making million dollar stock trades at home i hope you hire someone like me to make sure your network isn't worthless.
BorgiaGinz:jayphat: Senescent Dawn: jayphat: Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
Do you know what the poverty rate for the elderly was before social security's inception? Around half. The poor lived in a Dickensian nightmare where they had to work under truly dangerous conditions if they wanted to eat that night. The idea that a world like that would be *preferable* to you compared to one where a small proportion of slobs take advantage of the system makes you, frankly, a piece of sh*t.
Do you know what our "poor" enjoy today? Seriously, go look it up. What we describe as our poor own a car, 3 televisions, a game system, a computer, a cell phone, fridge, microwave, etc etc. This net has grown to build a lifestyle for people. That's not the job of the federal government. Its to keep people from dying, while allowing the individual to better themselves through hard work and a drive for a better lifestyle. But hey, let's keep spending money out the ass so that everyone gets to live on the same level, right?
If being poor is so farking great, why don't you try supporting a family on $20,000 a year, then report back to us.
Here's an idea. Don't have a family. I didn't have kids until I was ready to financially. But let's trot out the "single mom of 3 argument" for every example of every single program the government offers. Do some people need help to get by? Absolutely and they should. No-pen should have to go to bed at night worrying if food will be available tomorrow. But give me a break on well over HALF what the government says they need to provide to people as a basic necessity because 25% of it isn't needed, and 25% don't need it.
jayphat:Wtf are you talking about? Never once have I mentioned race in anything I posted.
You mentioned Cadillacs and "the club", therefore you must have been referring to black people and are definitely a racist.
Dear ghare, if you think that what he wrote is racist, you're the racist. I disagree with everything jayphat said, but he didn't mention anything about race.
jayphat:ut give me a break on well over HALF what the government says they need to provide to people as a basic necessity because 25% of it isn't needed, and 25% don't need it.
Newsflash, the vast majority of people on welfare programs are on them for only a short time. And there are many people who could really use them, but aren't eligible. Your complaining about a group of people who are a tiny minority of all welfare recipients while overlooking there are far more people around who could benefit but for one reason or another aren't eligible. And then there's the matter of the benefits themselves. Some of which, like SSI, are appallingly bad.
Corvus:The thing right wingers in this thread don;t want you to remember:
Republican's authored, and passed the budget we are in, in april. They demanded these cuts and didn't care if they lost jobs. They want to blame the budget on Democrats but it was authored by them and passed by Republican majorities in both the house and senate. It's a REPUBLICAN BUDGET.
I'm sorry, but unless I read the election results incorrectly, the Democrats still hold a majority of the Senate. That said, all budgets must be created in the House, so it did get through a Republican-led House first, but still Corvus, you know better than that...
Senescent Dawn:jayphat: Do you know what our "poor" enjoy today? Seriously, go look it up. What we describe as our poor own a car, 3 televisions, a game system, a computer, a cell phone, fridge, microwave, etc etc. This net has grown to build a lifestyle for people. That's not the job of the federal government. Its to keep people from dying, while allowing the individual to better themselves through hard work and a drive for a better lifestyle. But hey, let's keep spending money out the ass so that everyone gets to live on the same level, right?
You're begrudging people a fridge and a microwave? I suppose you're the kind of person who enjoys driving past shantytowns in your Lexus. Don't fool yourself -- a poor life is an austere life. Just because some of them drop $50 dollars for a used XBox is not evidence for living high on the hog.
The whole issue is a red herring anyway. Dolts like you LOVE to trot out the "welfare queen" argument as what's wrong with the country's budgetary outlook, but as a proportion of federal spending, welfare ranks quite low. And the proportion of people who don't truly need it is even lower. Obviously, it's important that we have a drive to succeed, but a basic standard of human living in the richest country on Earth is not a bad thing.
Ill have you know that I work a 50k a year job that took me 12 years to get. Only a high school degree because I couldn't afford college and the idea of student loans scared the crap out of me. I drive a 6year old Honda, used. So sorry if my point of view seems jarred to you. But I still work retail in a portion of the city where the client base is Medicaid participants, and I get a little edgy when I see them come in with their nice new phone, in A&f clothes, and paying nothing for prescriptions because im footing the bill.
Safety net is to keep you from falling, not to prop up your lifestyle and until any of you live/ are exposed to it in its current form, you cannot begin to imagine the amount of waste there is EVERYDAY.
dustlesswalnut:jayphat: Wtf are you talking about? Never once have I mentioned race in anything I posted.
You mentioned Cadillacs and "the club", therefore you must have been referring to black people and are definitely a racist.
Dear ghare, if you think that what he wrote is racist, you're the racist. I disagree with everything jayphat said, but he didn't mention anything about race.
Ahhh, the old "if you notice someone is racist, you're the real racist!" ploy!
First, tax cuts generate jobs. Look all around us. It's like a taping of Oprah: A job for you! A job for you! Everyone gets jobs! Second, if we weren't fighting a war, terrorists would blow you up. You can't have a job vis-a-vis tax cuts if you're dead.
dustlesswalnut:jayphat: Wtf are you talking about? Never once have I mentioned race in anything I posted.
You mentioned Cadillacs and "the club", therefore you must have been referring to black people and are definitely a racist.
Dear ghare, if you think that what he wrote is racist, you're the racist. I disagree with everything jayphat said, but he didn't mention anything about race.
Nope. This family I was referring to was 100% white. And the wife was a looker let me tell you.
MrGMan:Corvus: The thing right wingers in this thread don;t want you to remember:
Republican's authored, and passed the budget we are in, in april. They demanded these cuts and didn't care if they lost jobs. They want to blame the budget on Democrats but it was authored by them and passed by Republican majorities in both the house and senate. It's a REPUBLICAN BUDGET.
I'm sorry, but unless I read the election results incorrectly, the Democrats still hold a majority of the Senate. That said, all budgets must be created in the House, so it did get through a Republican-led House first, but still Corvus, you know better than that...
It was passed by a majority of republicans. More than half of the Republicans voted for it in the senate.
A Majority of republicans: More than 50% of the Republicans in the senate.
Little.Alex:Libs feel, conservative think. And btw: your posts are constant proof of it.
Funny, your posts display no thought at all, ever. You can't even comprehend that the private sector plays a role, a huge one, in the health of the economy.
jayphat:But I still work retail in a portion of the city where the client base is Medicaid participants
Instead of thinking there's something wrong with the fact that we put people in debt to go to college in order to better themselves, you lash out at the needy. *facepalm*
ghare:dustlesswalnut: jayphat: Wtf are you talking about? Never once have I mentioned race in anything I posted.
You mentioned Cadillacs and "the club", therefore you must have been referring to black people and are definitely a racist.
Dear ghare, if you think that what he wrote is racist, you're the racist. I disagree with everything jayphat said, but he didn't mention anything about race.
Ahhh, the old "if you notice someone is racist, you're the real racist!" ploy!
He's a racist as well as an idiot, and a liar.
Oh please. Tell me where i'm lying. Or point out the idiotic part.
First, tax cuts generate jobs. Look all around us. It's like a taping of Oprah: A job for you! A job for you! Everyone gets jobs! Second, if we weren't fighting a war, terrorists would blow you up. You can't have a job vis-a-vis tax cuts if you're dead.
That picture is about 20 years old, so I think the current White House is more responsible. This is the obama economy, with all his programs in place from the 2 years When Democrats controlled the House, Senate and White House.
It turns out that socialism doesn't work. Every serious person knew that, except Ostupid, and the racists who voted for him.
MrGMan:Corvus: The thing right wingers in this thread don;t want you to remember:
Republican's authored, and passed the budget we are in, in april. They demanded these cuts and didn't care if they lost jobs. They want to blame the budget on Democrats but it was authored by them and passed by Republican majorities in both the house and senate. It's a REPUBLICAN BUDGET.
I'm sorry, but unless I read the election results incorrectly, the Democrats still hold a majority of the Senate. That said, all budgets must be created in the House, so it did get through a Republican-led House first, but still Corvus, you know better than that...
I didn't say "senate majority of republicans" I said "Republican majorities in the senate". it's not the same.
Do you support free contraception and free, open access to abortion?
How about offspring licenses? If you want a kid, you have to prove you can support it. Want to live in that world?
Free access to contraception? Absolutely. Hell, sometimes I wont call the cops when someone steals it from me just because I don't want them spreading their genes. As for a license to offspring? No that's stupid. But I do not believe for a second if you are on government assistance you should recieve more if you pop out another child.
jayphat:eraser8: Thanks for caving to the Republicans again, Obama.
They've managed to get you to go along with wrecking the economy and laying the groundwork for destroying the social safety net. Congratulations, Mr. President..
Jesus, if I hear the words social safety net anymore I am gonna throw up. I wonder how the last 20 generations of this country got to this point without the "social safety net" that every one of these people keeps screaming about. The same net where someone driving a Cadillac has 3 kids, a cell phone, uses their food stamps to buy steak, shrimp, pop, and candy, while whipping out $100 and buying cartons of cigarettes. Then complaining about not being able to go to the club tonight. Don't tell me this isn't typical of the system. I worked retail for far too long and it was the rule, NOT the exception.
You're an idiot.
I don't believe for a second you're being the least bit truthful.
In fact, I suggest you read a bit and live a bit before you claim such a thing is the rule. You might start here:
WhyteRaven74:jayphat: But I still work retail in a portion of the city where the client base is Medicaid participants
Instead of thinking there's something wrong with the fact that we put people in debt to go to college in order to better themselves, you lash out at the needy. *facepalm*
It;s not ironic if he thinks college has nothing to do with self-improvement. And the more college is connected to post-grad income instead of health, happiness, and problem solving, the less it will be considered self-improvement. He probably assumes that the only investments worth making are those that make money instead of protect it or use it wisely.
jayphat:But I do not believe for a second if you are on government assistance you should recieve more if you pop out another child.
Sure. Make them expose it on a hillside.
Your arguments make no sense. Most people that are in poverty were born into it. Saying "we'll support you but not your baby" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
jayphat:derp. I think people should respond to my obvious lies with rational responses, even though nothing they say will change my opinion
Nope. Like trying to teach a horse to sing, waste of my time, annoys the horse. But I do know this: old game consoles, color tvs, cell phones, computers etc. can be had for FREE on craigslist. FREE. Poor people can get them, because they're FREE.
jayphat:dustlesswalnut: jayphat: Don't have a family.
Do you support free contraception and free, open access to abortion?
How about offspring licenses? If you want a kid, you have to prove you can support it. Want to live in that world?
Free access to contraception? Absolutely. Hell, sometimes I wont call the cops when someone steals it from me just because I don't want them spreading their genes. As for a license to offspring? No that's stupid. But I do not believe for a second if you are on government assistance you should recieve more if you pop out another child.
Say what you want. Denying a kid assistance is really looked down upon.
Well at least someone is trying to do something. Look what I found over on a left-leaning site:
We demand the unification of all America into one nation on the basis of the people's right to self-determination.
We demand equality of rights for the American people in respect to the other nations; abrogation of the treaties of NATO and NAFTA.
We demand land for the sustenance of our people.
Whoever has no citizenship is to be able to live in America only as a guest, and must be under the authority of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The right to determine matters concerning administration and law belongs only to the citizen. Therefore we demand that every public office, of any sort whatsoever, whether in the Federal, the State or local municipality, be filled only by citizens.
We demand that the government be charged first with providing the opportunity for a job and way of life for the citizens. If it is impossible to provide jobs for total population of the country, then non-citizens are to be sent home.
All citizens must have equal rights and obligations.
The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically. The activity of individuals is not to counteract the interests of the people, but must have its result within the framework of the whole for the benefit of all. Consequently we demand: Abolition of corporate dividends, interest and royalties not earned by honest labor. Breaking of debt (interest)-slavery. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
We demand the nationalization of all corporate industries and trusts.
We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.
We demand an expansion on a large scale of Social Security.
We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate nationalization of national resources and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
We demand a land reform suitable to our needs, provision of a law for the free expropriation of land for the purposes of public utility, abolition of taxes on farmland and prevention of all speculation in land.
We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, profiteers and so forth are to be punished..
We demand substitution of a peoples law serving a materialistic world-order.
The government is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious American to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into better jobs. The curriculum of all educational institutions are to relevant to the experiences of practical life. The understanding of the concept of the State must be undertaken by the school as early as the first grade. We demand the education at the expense of the government of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
The government is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a health and sport requirement, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical fitness of the youth of America.
We demand abolition of the US military and formation of a national works program.
We demand legal prosecution of known lies and their promulgation through the press, specifically Fox News and the Murdoch Empire. In order to enable the provision of a peoples press, we demand, that: a. All writers and employees of the newspapers appearing in the U.S. be licensed by the government: b. Non-licensed newspapers be required to have the express permission of the Government to be published. c. Publications which are counter to the general welfare are to be forbidden. We demand legal prosecution of artistic and literary forms which exert a destructive influence on our national life, such as Country Music and "christian rock", and the closure of organizations opposing the above made demands.
We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the country so long as they do not endanger the country or oppose the moral senses of the people. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity, a liberation theology to combat the materialistic spirit within and around us, and is convinced that a lasting recovery of our nation can only succeed from within on the framework: The good of the country before the good of the individual.
To accomplish of all of this we demand the formation of a strong national government and the elimination of federalism. Unlimited authority of the national government over the whole country.
Safety net is to keep you from falling, not to prop up your lifestyle and until any of you live/ are exposed to it in its current form, you cannot begin to imagine the amount of waste there is EVERYDAY.
You are aware that everything you listed can be had for under $500 these days thanks to slave labor, aren't you? A microwave, TV, and a cellphone? I could get all of those for under $100.
Or are you going to pretend you've walked into many a poorhouse and saw 60-inch 1080p plasma flatscreens with NFL Sunday ticket, now?
Little.Alex:European style socialism yields European style poverty and stagnation.
Funny, the US has had over 20 years of income stagnation and right now the German economy is doing much better than the US economy. And BTW Romney came up with the idea of a health insurance mandate, and he's not opposed to business regulations and other fun stuff you scream against.
ghare:Nope. Like trying to teach a horse to sing, waste of my time, annoys the horse. But I do know this: old game consoles, color tvs, cell phones, computers etc. can be had for FREE on craigslist. FREE. Poor people can get them, because they're FREE.
Don't delude yourself. There are plenty of people receiving government assistance that have a brand-new TV and a brand-new game console that they bought for retail prices at a national retailer.
I'm OK with that. I'd rather have poor kids online playing COD than wandering the streets smashing my car window in for the change in the center console.
Acting like all poor people wander around picking through garbage is bullshiat. That's not how the real world works.
dustlesswalnut:jayphat: But I do not believe for a second if you are on government assistance you should recieve more if you pop out another child.
Sure. Make them expose it on a hillside.
Your arguments make no sense. Most people that are in poverty were born into it. Saying "we'll support you but not your baby" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.
Jesus christ. Am I talking to a wall? So, we discourage bad behavior by saying "here's more money!" Look, if when you file for your assistance and have a kid/kids, then yes you factor that as well. But do not add anything on top of that. There's zero reason a person should be giving more money for engaging in a process that results in more children when you cannot support the ones you have. And until you get that idea across, its going to be a problem.
This is the 1994 welfare reform argument all over again. People were screaming "but babies are gonna die" ans guess what? It NEVER HAPPENED! People took responsibility and started to live by the rules of the system.
Cause the DOW was definitely doing fine before the deal was reached, and would have been fine if we defaulted.
Actually, the market would have liked no deal more than that deal. And no deal would not have meant a default -just a return to 2007 spending levels. "Default" was a media/White House lie to spook people.
This week, Washington sent a message to the financial markets. The message is this, "We cannot control spending, and we have decided to manage the failure of Social Security and Medicare through hyper-inflation."
Before the deal, you had the markets reacting to the possibility that the Government might act in a completely irresponsible manner. Now you have the certainty.
I lost about $30,000 in the market this week, and I did better than the market as a whole. But at least Obama won't be back for a second term, now that the obama recession has started. He'll be running with record spending, Depression level unemployment and $10 gasoline.
Yoyo:organizmx: And so begins the Tea Party recession.
Everyone warned them that holding the debt ceiling hostage until the last minute (which had never been done before in American history) was going to do this, but they didn't want to listen.
Now we're all going to suffer the consequences.
Wait a minute. Everyone said this, economic collapse, would happen if the debt ceiling wasn't raise. The ceiling was raised, and yet this is still happening. I still contend we should have tried something new this time.
I agree, we should have been rounding up the teabaggers and the "job creators" and cleaning out society.
Snake Vargas:under $500 these days thanks to slave labor,
Funny thing is, you could make all that stuff in the US with a negligible change in the prices. Manufacturing cell phones in the US would increase the cost of a cell phone, as far as labor is concerned, by maybe 50 cents. And since it's made in the US you don't have to deal with the ginormous shipping bill to get it here. And if you want to ship some to Europe, it's a ton cheaper and far far faster to ship something from the US to Europe than from Asia to Europe
It is abundantly clear that the Congress of the United States + serial Executive Administrations represent the most serious threat to our National Security and the continuance of the Constitution since Gen Robert Ross burned the District for the British. The only course remaining to us is either (a) the National Command Authority seizes Washington DC under their authority to protect and defend the Constitution of the Republic of the United States and the survival of the Nation and arrest every member of Congress, every head of every Department, every Lobbyist, every employee of the Executive Branch. Seize and arrest every State chairperson of the two parties and set a date for free elections to be restored under the eye and guidance of the Judicial Branch with military overwatch.
Or ... you and I do it.
There's no Third Choice.
The problem is not that people don't know what to do. The problem is they don't know when to do it.
And personally, I'd have F18s crater both the RNC and DNC HQs until it will be impossible to ever build there again and erect memorials as a warning to tyrants.
jayphat:Jesus christ. Am I talking to a wall? So, we discourage bad behavior by saying "here's more money!" Look, if when you file for your assistance and have a kid/kids, then yes you factor that as well. But do not add anything on top of that. There's zero reason a person should be giving more money for engaging in a process that results in more children when you cannot support the ones you have. And until you get that idea across, its going to be a problem.
This is the 1994 welfare reform argument all over again. People were screaming "but babies are gonna die" ans guess what? It NEVER HAPPENED! People took responsibility and started to live by the rules of the system.
So it was all fixed in 1994? Why do we need to change it now?
Do you realize how poor reproductive education is in this country? Unless you support the creation of a whole new federally-mandated program (tax-supported!) that will educate every child in this country before they reach puberty about how babby is formed, your claim that they should know better is bunk.
I don't give a flying fark about mom&dad, I'd rather give welfare to the kid directly before I let the parents have it and purposefully exclude those that have no way to support themselves on their own.
WhyteRaven74:Snake Vargas: under $500 these days thanks to slave labor,
Funny thing is, you could make all that stuff in the US with a negligible change in the prices. Manufacturing cell phones in the US would increase the cost of a cell phone, as far as labor is concerned, by maybe 50 cents. And since it's made in the US you don't have to deal with the ginormous shipping bill to get it here. And if you want to ship some to Europe, it's a ton cheaper and far far faster to ship something from the US to Europe than from Asia to Europe
Do you have any citation on those numbers? Hourly wages in china are about $1.36 with no benefits or retirement. I can't imagine a 10x increase in labor costs would have that negligible increase on product cost.
ayn rand is a tard. a lot of our issues can be traced to idiots who thought rand had even a single good idea. yeah i'm looking in your direction you farking tarded worthless social-climbing idiot named al greenspan.
So, have we determined whether it's the Teabaggers or Libs fault yet? It has to be one or the other, not the fact we're a brazillian dollars in debt with no clear way to pay it off.