If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Some Guy)   Jews and Muslims cease being snippy, come together in favor of pulling back circumcision ban   (1035superx.com) divider line 381
    More: Interesting  
•       •       •

5173 clicks; posted to Main » on 22 Jun 2011 at 7:37 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



381 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-06-22 06:02:03 PM
They get the title of the article wrong

Jews And Muslims In City By The Bay Working On Banning Circumcisions

That's not what's happening.

And the next sentence, which deserved to be on it's own:

Jews and Muslims working together.

... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Oh wait, that's in Israel. It happens all the time. Jews and Arabs, Jews and Muslims, working together hand by hand.

Why the fark is that supposed to be some sort of wonderment that even deserves a mention?

Some people are farking retarded and need to get out of their little bubble.

Next article: 'Christian and Atheist seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11'?
 
2011-06-22 06:03:34 PM
Tatsuma: ... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Forgot to add 'Even more so in America'.

I know, I know, the article was greenlit based on the headline and not the story, but this is a retarded article and it insults actual journalists and thinking people everywhere.
 
2011-06-22 07:40:10 PM
This level of butthurt is just the beginning. I guess you could call it the tip of the Goldberg
 
2011-06-22 07:41:23 PM
Got nothing to add, so here's a hot girl in a turtleneck.

www.wintercoatsjackets.com
 
2011-06-22 07:41:53 PM
coming together to defend mutilation of the innocent. such a beautiful thing.
 
2011-06-22 07:42:37 PM
I saw that Campbell's has bacon clam chowder when I was at the store the other day. It's like they wanted the ultimate in unclean foods put into a handy easily opened can. What is wrong with them?
 
TWX
2011-06-22 07:42:45 PM
Tatsuma:
Next article: 'Christian and Atheist seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11'?


It would be kinda funny if the article was, "Baptist and Muslim seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11"...

Or, "Jew and Muslim seen eating pulled-pork sandwiches at Waldo's Barbecue, more at 11"...
 
2011-06-22 07:43:39 PM
It seems unfair to make a decision about another persons body parts based on religious text in this day and age.
 
2011-06-22 07:44:21 PM
Oh goody, this thread again.
 
2011-06-22 07:44:40 PM
About time people get serious about banning circumcision. If an adult man or woman wants to get circumcised, they sure can. It's a serious human rights violation to circumcise infant children who have no voice to object to being mutilated for life. If not for the special preference given to religion in society, this barbaric practice would have died a long time ago.

Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.
 
2011-06-22 07:44:56 PM
Yay! A circumcision thread and I got in at the beginning. These are always fun.
 
2011-06-22 07:45:13 PM
The ONLY people who really have a real opinion in the matter are adult men who have had circumcisions as adults either by choice or medical need.

From what I've heard it's a very painful RECOVERY process as an adult and they wish they had it done at a time they would have no memory of it or have to deal with the pain of recovery.

They are also the ones to offer data as to how it affects sensation and secual performance and pleasure.

Everybody else in the "debate" is just projecting an agenda.
 
2011-06-22 07:46:44 PM
velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

Female circumcision == removal of the labia and clitoris.

Male circumcision == removal of flap of skin.

NOT the same thing.
 
2011-06-22 07:47:26 PM
velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

A good first step to understand this would be to read up on both, and difference between both and then you'll stop being so confused.
 
2011-06-22 07:47:35 PM

". yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends."


Subby, YOU are no Muslim Kennedy!


wwwimage.cbsnews.com

 
2011-06-22 07:47:57 PM
velvet_fog: About time people get serious about banning circumcision. If an adult man or woman wants to get circumcised, they sure can. It's a serious human rights violation to circumcise infant children who have no voice to object to being mutilated for life. If not for the special preference given to religion in society, this barbaric practice would have died a long time ago.

Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.


Isn't it rather insulting towards women to compare a clitorectemy with the removal of some extra skin?
 
2011-06-22 07:48:23 PM
Hey everyone, my holy book tells me that I should gouge out one of my child's eyes and don't tell me I can't because they can still see ok with the other one so it's not child abuse and you are an intolerant bigot if you won't let me and WHY ARE YOU PERSECUTING ME?!!!
 
2011-06-22 07:48:55 PM
Why are these middle eastern cults special? What would you say to a "religion" that demands the tattooing and piercing of infants? Foot binding? Skull elongation?
 
2011-06-22 07:49:00 PM
lohphat: The ONLY people who really have a real opinion in the matter are adult men who have had circumcisions as adults either by choice or medical need.

From what I've heard it's a very painful RECOVERY process as an adult and they wish they had it done at a time they would have no memory of it or have to deal with the pain of recovery.

They are also the ones to offer data as to how it affects sensation and secual performance and pleasure.

Everybody else in the "debate" is just projecting an agenda.


And most of the studies conducted report no significant change in sexual performance or pleasure.
 
2011-06-22 07:49:52 PM
Good lord, the writing in that article is beyond horrifying. Seriously, was somebody paid for that ultimate trainwreck?
 
2011-06-22 07:50:33 PM
Another farking "to cut or not to cut" thread?
 
2011-06-22 07:51:09 PM
It's shocking that a religion that requires men to cut off part of their dick to join would have any members at all.
 
2011-06-22 07:51:27 PM
Tommy Moo: Hey everyone, my holy book tells me that I should gouge out one of my child's eyes and don't tell me I can't because they can still see ok with the other one so it's not child abuse and you are an intolerant bigot if you won't let me and WHY ARE YOU PERSECUTING ME?!!!

Nice, that's exactly what is happening. Because of course people see with their foreskins as well.
 
2011-06-22 07:51:31 PM
Penis
 
2011-06-22 07:51:51 PM
Tatsuma: Tatsuma: ... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Forgot to add 'Even more so in America'.


Americans tend to frown upon community leaders telling people to take up arms against their countrymen.
 
2011-06-22 07:52:03 PM
Just curious...any circumcised men around who regret that this was done without their permission? I've dated both cut and uncut guys over the years, and it seemed to me they were all OK with their foreskins or lack thereof.

I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds? Does anyone wish their foreskin had been left intact?
 
2011-06-22 07:52:12 PM
Fark you I'm an anteater.jpg
 
2011-06-22 07:52:29 PM
Tatsuma:Jews and Muslims working together.

Why the fark is that supposed to be some sort of wonderment that even deserves a mention?


Because the Prophet Muhammed, blessings etc, explicitly instructed every Muslim that whenever they see a Jew they have to kill him.
 
2011-06-22 07:52:30 PM
velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

lol, somebody doesn't know what happens in a female circumcision.
 
2011-06-22 07:53:04 PM
lohphat: velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

Female circumcision == removal of the labia and clitoris.

Male circumcision == removal of flap of skin.

NOT the same thing.


Labia aren't flaps of skin?
 
2011-06-22 07:53:11 PM
lohphat: velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

Female circumcision == removal of the labia and clitoris.

Male circumcision == removal of flap of skin.

NOT the same thing.


Infant genital mutilation is infant genital mutilation. You might as well argue losing a finger is okay because it isn't as bad as losing a hand.
 
2011-06-22 07:53:23 PM
MrEricSir: It's shocking that a religion that requires men to cut off part of their dick to join would have any members at all.

Which is why they do it to children, not men.
 
2011-06-22 07:54:30 PM
Shenanigans!: I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds?

Well, it is San Francisco. They're also trying to get a bill or whatever in that bans the sale of goldfish.
 
2011-06-22 07:54:55 PM
I'm due to give birth to a male baby in San Francisco right when this law would pass, so its outcome is of keen interest to me. I can see both sides of the debate, so in the end, I'm letting my husband make the decision as to what'll happen to our little guy's shlong.
 
2011-06-22 07:55:15 PM
Shenanigans!: Just curious...any circumcised men around who regret that this was done without their permission? I've dated both cut and uncut guys over the years, and it seemed to me they were all OK with their foreskins or lack thereof.

I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds? Does anyone wish their foreskin had been left intact?


Most of the people in the movement are women, more specifically mothers. A friend of mine who is in to this told me it was all about saving babies from pain. It's a movement built on emotion, there is very little logic involved.
 
2011-06-22 07:55:30 PM
Tatsuma: They get the title of the article wrong

Jews And Muslims In City By The Bay Working On Banning Circumcisions

That's not what's happening.

And the next sentence, which deserved to be on it's own:

Jews and Muslims working together.

... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Oh wait, that's in Israel. It happens all the time. Jews and Arabs, Jews and Muslims, working together hand by hand.

Why the fark is that supposed to be some sort of wonderment that even deserves a mention?

Some people are farking retarded and need to get out of their little bubble.

Next article: 'Christian and Atheist seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11'?



Congrats on yet another greenlight, Tats.
 
2011-06-22 07:55:58 PM
skinna marink a shrinky dink

/got nuttin'
 
2011-06-22 07:55:59 PM
Tatsuma: velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

A good first step to understand this would be to read up on both, and difference between both and then you'll stop being so confused.


Get bent. Both are done because sex is evil and we want to prevent our children from enjoying it so they will live austere, righteous lives. "Hygiene" is a bullshiat excuse. Wash your farking dick.
 
2011-06-22 07:56:17 PM
Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Shenanigans!: Just curious...any circumcised men around who regret that this was done without their permission? I've dated both cut and uncut guys over the years, and it seemed to me they were all OK with their foreskins or lack thereof.

I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds? Does anyone wish their foreskin had been left intact?

Most of the people in the movement are women, more specifically mothers. A friend of mine who is in to this told me it was all about saving babies from pain. It's a movement built on emotion, there is very little logic involved.


I was with my little man when he got his circ done. With the local anesthetic, he didn't feel a thing. If he did, he didn't make a peep.
 
2011-06-22 07:56:41 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: Did you actually read the table. The study with the most number of participants read:

"Circumcised men more likely to ejaculate prematurely"
 
2011-06-22 07:57:00 PM
Tommy Moo: Tatsuma: velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

A good first step to understand this would be to read up on both, and difference between both and then you'll stop being so confused.

Get bent. Both are done because sex is evil and we want to prevent our children from enjoying it so they will live austere, righteous lives. "Hygiene" is a bullshiat excuse. Wash your farking dick.


And yet most studies show that men who have had it done show no marked decrease in sexual satisfaction. Imagine that.
 
2011-06-22 07:57:03 PM
Tatsuma: It happens all the time. Jews and Arabs, Jews and Muslims, working together hand by hand.

Why the fark is that supposed to be some sort of wonderment that even deserves a mention?


As a Jew, I'm supposed to hate that Syrian family down the street that runs the kebab shop. But they make the best falafel and hummus .. plus they're really cool and we sit on their patio and smoke hookah.

/pretty sure they don't even spit in my food
 
2011-06-22 07:57:06 PM
Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Tommy Moo: Hey everyone, my holy book tells me that I should gouge out one of my child's eyes and don't tell me I can't because they can still see ok with the other one so it's not child abuse and you are an intolerant bigot if you won't let me and WHY ARE YOU PERSECUTING ME?!!!

Nice, that's exactly what is happening. Because of course people see with their foreskins as well.


It's the exact same principle. Who are you to tell me that my foreskin isn't just as valuable to me as an eye?
 
2011-06-22 07:57:20 PM
Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Most of the people in the movement are women, more specifically mothers. A friend of mine who is in to this told me it was all about saving babies from pain. It's a movement built on emotion, there is very little logic involved.

To be entirely fair, there is very little logic involved, in that sense, with religious groups arguing for circumcision.
 
2011-06-22 07:58:00 PM
People in the US have really cut back on infant circumcisions over the past decade.

/Mohels suck.
 
2011-06-22 07:59:23 PM
Tommy Moo: Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Tommy Moo: Hey everyone, my holy book tells me that I should gouge out one of my child's eyes and don't tell me I can't because they can still see ok with the other one so it's not child abuse and you are an intolerant bigot if you won't let me and WHY ARE YOU PERSECUTING ME?!!!

Nice, that's exactly what is happening. Because of course people see with their foreskins as well.

It's the exact same principle. Who are you to tell me that my foreskin isn't just as valuable to me as an eye?


Because it farking isn't. That's like saying your nipple is more valuable than your heart.


The_Six_Fingered_Man: Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Shenanigans!: Just curious...any circumcised men around who regret that this was done without their permission? I've dated both cut and uncut guys over the years, and it seemed to me they were all OK with their foreskins or lack thereof.

I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds? Does anyone wish their foreskin had been left intact?

Most of the people in the movement are women, more specifically mothers. A friend of mine who is in to this told me it was all about saving babies from pain. It's a movement built on emotion, there is very little logic involved.

I was with my little man when he got his circ done. With the local anesthetic, he didn't feel a thing. If he did, he didn't make a peep.


Of course, it's also a movement tied heavily to the home birthing movement. Both disdain doctors, their involvement at all in the birthing process or pretty much anything they do.
 
2011-06-22 07:59:30 PM
Gaylord Fister: The_Six_Fingered_Man: Did you actually read the table. The study with the most number of participants read:

"Circumcised men more likely to ejaculate prematurely"


Are they not performing or satisfied? But I should point out that it's a telephone survey. The stopwatch study showed no difference. In fact, all of the studies not based on surveys show no difference, or a greater time to ejaculation.
 
2011-06-22 07:59:39 PM
The_Six_Fingered_Man: Tommy Moo: Tatsuma: velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

A good first step to understand this would be to read up on both, and difference between both and then you'll stop being so confused.

Get bent. Both are done because sex is evil and we want to prevent our children from enjoying it so they will live austere, righteous lives. "Hygiene" is a bullshiat excuse. Wash your farking dick.

And yet most studies show that men who have had it done show no marked decrease in sexual satisfaction. Imagine that.


1) You're full of shiat. 60% of sexual sensitivity is in the foreskin
2) Even if you weren't full of shiat, "most" isn't good enough. Should we allow people to perform a completely meaningless procedure with no medical benefit on newborns because it will "only" stunt growth in 10% of cases? Because it will "only" cause autism 7% of the time?
 
2011-06-22 07:59:58 PM
Tatsuma: Next article: 'Christian and Atheist seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11'?

You know why you should always go fishing with two Baptists, right?
 
2011-06-22 08:00:14 PM
GladGirl:

> I'm letting my husband make the decision as to what'll happen to our little guy's shlong.

Now you're just farking retarded. You don't even care if unnecessary and irreversible surgical procedures are carried out on your child? You don't care about the risk that comes with every surgery?

/your children will hate you with a passion
 
Displayed 50 of 381 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report