They get the title of the article wrong

Jews And Muslims In City By The Bay Working On Banning Circumcisions

That's not what's happening.

And the next sentence, which deserved to be on it's own:

Jews and Muslims working together.

... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Oh wait, that's in Israel. It happens all the time. Jews and Arabs, Jews and Muslims, working together hand by hand.

Why the fark is that supposed to be some sort of wonderment that even deserves a mention?

Some people are farking retarded and need to get out of their little bubble.

Next article: 'Christian and Atheist seen drinking a beer at bar, more at 11'?

Tatsuma: ... yeah, so farking what? I worked with two muslim guys. I know plenty of Muslims. I have a couple of Muslim friends.

Forgot to add 'Even more so in America'.

I know, I know, the article was greenlit based on the headline and not the story, but this is a retarded article and it insults actual journalists and thinking people everywhere.

This level of butthurt is just the beginning. I guess you could call it the tip of the Goldberg

I saw that Campbell's has bacon clam chowder when I was at the store the other day. It's like they wanted the ultimate in unclean foods put into a handy easily opened can. What is wrong with them?

The ONLY people who really have a real opinion in the matter are adult men who have had circumcisions as adults either by choice or medical need.

From what I've heard it's a very painful RECOVERY process as an adult and they wish they had it done at a time they would have no memory of it or have to deal with the pain of recovery.

They are also the ones to offer data as to how it affects sensation and secual performance and pleasure.

Everybody else in the "debate" is just projecting an agenda.

velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

Female circumcision == removal of the labia and clitoris.

Male circumcision == removal of flap of skin.

NOT the same thing.

velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

A good first step to understand this would be to read up on both, and difference between both and then you'll stop being so confused.

Good lord, the writing in that article is beyond horrifying. Seriously, was somebody paid for that ultimate trainwreck?

Penis

velvet_fog: Always found it insane there was so much outrage about female circumcision, but not a peep about male circumcision until recent years. It's an absurd double standard.

lol, somebody doesn't know what happens in a female circumcision.

Shenanigans!: I gotta think something is driving this proposed ban...or is it really as batshiat crazy as it sounds?

Well, it is San Francisco. They're also trying to get a bill or whatever in that bans the sale of goldfish.

I'm due to give birth to a male baby in San Francisco right when this law would pass, so its outcome is of keen interest to me. I can see both sides of the debate, so in the end, I'm letting my husband make the decision as to what'll happen to our little guy's shlong.

Kim-Chi_and_Blaze: Most of the people in the movement are women, more specifically mothers. A friend of mine who is in to this told me it was all about saving babies from pain. It's a movement built on emotion, there is very little logic involved.

To be entirely fair, there is very little logic involved, in that sense, with religious groups arguing for circumcision.