Do you have adblock enabled?
If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(MSNBC)   Cameron Diaz claims she's a "victim" for posing nude in her pre-stardom days. Trial lawyers rejoice   ( divider line
    More: Asinine  
•       •       •

21372 clicks; posted to Main » on 05 Aug 2003 at 12:58 PM (14 years ago)   |   Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»

129 Comments     (+0 »)

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

2003-08-05 12:02:53 PM  
First Reese Witherspoon upset that people are renting her first movie where she has a nude scene, now this.

Note to actresses, if you plan on making it big, don't do a nude scene, cause it WILL come back to haunt you. If you use your boobs to get on the fast track, the cost is that pervs will always go back to see them.
2003-08-05 12:02:56 PM  
Hypocrisy riegns supreme, again.

Just admit the truth, you were young and made a judgement you wouldn't have made today. That's it. No need for transparent bull. You're physical attributes are part of being in your profession - it's all understandable. The lying 'after the fact' isn't tho.
2003-08-05 12:29:11 PM  
The judge is going to seal the photos. After he's done with that, he's going to un-pop balloons.
2003-08-05 12:36:53 PM  
What a bastard, offering her first shot on buying the photos.
2003-08-05 12:40:48 PM  
I'm not sure what effect any of this will have, since only approximately 345,719 websites exist that have those pic available for anyone with a computer to view for free.
2003-08-05 12:47:58 PM  
Personal responsibility surrenders.
2003-08-05 12:54:50 PM  
So, let me get this straight...she had no problem posing for Playboy or having her nud pics on websites all over the world after she was famous, but wants her pre-fame ones pulled?

What gives?

2003-08-05 01:01:31 PM  
so are these pics the ones we've seen or the ones that will get posted any second?
2003-08-05 01:02:26 PM  
Gimme a break...who isn't a WHORE in HOLLYWOOD??

and then their lawyers ALL CASH IN...
2003-08-05 01:02:59 PM  
She may be a victim, but my eyes were blessed
2003-08-05 01:03:38 PM  
I can't stands her.....
2003-08-05 01:04:18 PM  
her: "blah blah blah woe is me, i had to take my top off to become famous enough to practice hypocritical moralizing."

us: fap fap fap fap
2003-08-05 01:04:43 PM  
What, no pics?

2003-08-05 01:04:44 PM  
Have these hit the net yet? What about the video? She had to be about 18 then, right?

2003-08-05 01:05:06 PM  
She can't act worth a damn. She's not even that good looking. I can only forgive her for trying to be an actress when she takes her top off and even then just barely.
2003-08-05 01:05:14 PM  
I seen her in last months PlayBoy issue in a small pic on the page. I think it was last months.

You take off your clothes to get somewhere in life then you biatch that you did it once people find out.

2003-08-05 01:05:30 PM  
Allow me, the sole reader of the article, to explain:
Ms. Diaz did not sign a release for these particular nudie pics, and a release that was presented was forged. She is the alleged victim of an alleged forgery.

One presumes she has no problem with nude pics for which she was actually paid to pose.

Please continue with your apoplectic indignation.
2003-08-05 01:05:32 PM  
TSG with pics in 5... 4... 3...
2003-08-05 01:05:52 PM  
This is fine. I don't really want to see her nekkid, anyway. Thanks, Ms. Diaz!
2003-08-05 01:05:56 PM  
2003-08-05 01:06:06 PM  

Nude pictures of Cameron Diaz ? SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSMOKIN' !

[image from too old to be available]

2003-08-05 01:06:30 PM  
If she actually had talent, I could care.

But she doesn't and neither do I.
2003-08-05 01:08:02 PM  
But I thought ALL WOMEN were victims! Not just the ones with oodles of money and fame.
2003-08-05 01:08:17 PM  
I agree with you and the reasons for the suit.

Now, Sharon Stone biatching about her beaver shot in Basic Instinct and then releasing Sliver: Loser
2003-08-05 01:08:19 PM  
This kind of moralizing from a woman who a mere two years ago made a movie where she danced in her spiderman underoos? And a year or two before that put [one hopes] fake spooge in her hair in a film?

This makes me insane.
2003-08-05 01:08:52 PM  
Evidently they have hit the net. Anyone have a link to post?
2003-08-05 01:09:11 PM  
Microbe - close. All HUMANS are victims these days. At least the ones with lawyers are, anyway.
2003-08-05 01:10:38 PM  
ShutUpHippies, happiness is ...

Thank you!
2003-08-05 01:12:04 PM  
WOW those water shots are telling huh?
(refering the the NSFW link)
2003-08-05 01:12:40 PM  
tr!pps, yes especially those with enough money and fame to buy themselves some victimhood.

I wonder what victimization is going for these days? Someone call Johnny Cochran, he sets the market cap on that kind of stuff.
2003-08-05 01:12:53 PM  
When exactly did she pose for Playboy?
2003-08-05 01:13:41 PM  
Thanks! I feel complete having seen that site now.
2003-08-05 01:14:09 PM  
Good work, ShutUpHippies. She's got a nice set of ta tas.
2003-08-05 01:15:07 PM  
She's a victim he's a victim I'm a victim you're a victim wouldn't you like to be a victim too?

*Goes to iTunes and starts Robin Trower's "Victims of the Fury" at full volume*

bum da bum da bum da doody doody bum da bum da bum da dooty dooty...
2003-08-05 01:15:38 PM  
Sounds like there's cooter in the photos to me. And maybe a little hanky panky on the videotape.
2003-08-05 01:16:01 PM  
Some of these pics show up on a screensaver of her at:

She is one of the few actresses who did not run right out and get implants. Bonus points for her.

She claims that the release was a forgery. She might be lying.
2003-08-05 01:16:19 PM  
She was scandalously hittable in "The Mask", but somehow she's gotten very plain looking. NOt unattractive, but just kinda meh.
2003-08-05 01:17:03 PM  
Stoffel- You are right and everyone seems to ignore you. I'd have thought a rtfa post would help. What was I thinking?
2003-08-05 01:17:07 PM  
Little Elvis won't stand up for naked pictures of Cameron Diaz. Obviously they're not worth "sealing."

Trying to put the genie back in the bottle, I'd say...
2003-08-05 01:18:39 PM  
Big deal. If this bimbo isn't bright enough to realize how many nude pics of her there are on the 'net, she really is a victim of her own career-driven stupidity.

2003-08-05 01:18:56 PM  
Lesse... photos AND a tape... not your playboy-level porn... this is prolly more... interesting....

No wonder she wants 'em sealed.
2003-08-05 01:19:01 PM  
forget it. Do a google image search...
2003-08-05 01:20:05 PM  
I hate Cameron/Carmen Diaz. She's a self-important biatch and a psychotic germ-phobe, and she has never had a part where her character wasn't unbelievably obnoxious in a very blonde way, or a plaster saint, or both. She's a victim, all right, but more in this sense...

Physically? She's a stereotypical airbrushed Hollywood wraithbiatch - she does nothing for me. :-6
2003-08-05 01:20:42 PM  
"this" being
2003-08-05 01:20:55 PM  
My school choir sang a bunch of stuff by John Rutter last year. Too bad that didn't get sealed.
2003-08-05 01:22:25 PM  
Actually I think we're the victims: No pics with the article. ;)
2003-08-05 01:23:19 PM  
she's one boney biatch.

red beans and rice deflinitely missed her...
2003-08-05 01:23:37 PM  

all you gotta do, is head on over to and take a look....

what's that saying- putting a picture on the intarnet is like peeing in a pool.... You can't get it out....

2003-08-05 01:24:18 PM  
Seems easy enough to say "I didnt sign that, its a forgery" When in fact she just wants them to go away. Alot of people in La La Land do this. And then it comes back and gets them. At least she passed on Showgirls...
2003-08-05 01:26:44 PM  
Stoffel is right, just not very fun... he heh
Displayed 50 of 129 comments

Oldest | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Newest | Show all

This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking

On Twitter

Top Commented
Javascript is required to view headlines in widget.
  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.