If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Guardian)   "IN FUTURE, ALL NEW NUCLEAR REACTOR MUST BE BUILT OVER A 1.2 km hole. Any out of control reactor, one press of a buttom and boom, the reactor will fail down 1.2 km and then seal up with soil"   (guardian.co.uk) divider line 192
    More: Interesting, nuclear weapons, nuclear reactors, current affairs, deep oceans, radioactive contamination, reactor cores, nuclear and radiation accidents, water pollutions  
•       •       •

14831 clicks; posted to Main » on 06 Apr 2011 at 12:13 PM (3 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



192 Comments   (+0 »)
   
View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-04-06 08:43:21 AM
I think the Guardian and its readers need to fail down a 1.2 km hole for the level of fail in that article
 
2011-04-06 08:44:10 AM
IN FUTURE, ALL NEW NUCLEAR REACTOR MUST BE BUILT OVER A 1.2 km hole.

Mongo like headline.
 
2011-04-06 08:46:51 AM
All citizens must change their underwear every half-hour.

Underwear will be worn on the outside. So we can check.
 
2011-04-06 08:46:59 AM
FTA: As the late, great comedian George Carlin once said, "think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." 95% of the ideas that run through our heads are moronic, as the internet basically proves. If you want to know how to fix a power plant, or do brain surgery, or predict the effects of climate change, then ask an actual expert. Because no amount of hot air balloons can save a bad idea.

Can't argue with that.
 
2011-04-06 08:56:46 AM

IndyMBA: FTA: As the late, great comedian George Carlin once said, "think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." 95% of the ideas that run through our heads are moronic, as the internet basically proves. If you want to know how to fix a power plant, or do brain surgery, or predict the effects of climate change, then ask an actual expert. Because no amount of hot air balloons can save a bad idea.

Can't argue with that.


I see you haven't visited the politics tab lately
 
2011-04-06 08:57:27 AM
The button will be placed on the lunchroom Coke machine and be marked "bullion" because no one orders bullion from a Coke machine.

/possibily obscure
 
2011-04-06 09:02:24 AM

tuffsnake: I see you haven't visited the politics tab lately


Unfortunately, I'm there too often.
 
2011-04-06 09:30:51 AM
IN FUTURE, ALL PEOPLE FLY WITH JET PACKS
 
2011-04-06 09:42:47 AM
IN FUTURE, ALL YOU BASE ARE BELONG TO US
 
2011-04-06 09:55:16 AM
Should be required reading... I especially like the part about how not everyone's opinion matters all the time - hell a group of 10 people can't even decide where to go to have lunch.
 
2011-04-06 10:39:24 AM
Japan has over 30,000 suicides per year - that's over 80 per day. Since these people are planning to kill themselves anyway, how about the government asking for volunteers

heh
 
2011-04-06 11:29:55 AM
IN FUTURE, ALL RESTAURANTS ARE TACO BELL.
 
2011-04-06 11:39:14 AM

Petit_Merdeux: All citizens must change their underwear every half-hour.

Underwear will be worn on the outside. So we can check.


THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGE WILL BE SWEDISH!
 
2011-04-06 11:46:05 AM
"ATTENTION PEOPLE OF ENGLAND *(cough)* ..."
 
2011-04-06 11:50:04 AM
IN THE FUTURE THERE WILL BE ROBOTS
 
2011-04-06 11:58:19 AM
IN FUTURE, YAKOV SMIRNOV BECOME MAYOR OF BRANSON
 
2011-04-06 12:14:40 PM
IN FUTURE, ALL LOSERS OF ELECTION WILL BE EXECUTED
 
2011-04-06 12:15:24 PM
I think I just lost brain cells by headlines that readings,
 
2011-04-06 12:16:07 PM

King Something: IN THE FUTURE THERE WILL BE ROBOTS


Those aren't regulation moves.
 
2011-04-06 12:16:45 PM
In future, all people must become exposed to radiation so we can build up a resistance to it so we won't have to worry about radiation leaks anymore. Just think how much better our species would be if radiation didn't affect us.
 
2011-04-06 12:17:04 PM
And yet there's this odd, growing trend in the world today, fed by endless news vox-pops and the general 'X-Factorization' of television, that somehow everyone's opinions are valuable and worth listening to.

This should be carved across the top of everybody's computer monitor.
 
2011-04-06 12:17:11 PM
This reminds me of the Trailer Park Boys episode where Ricky throws a beer can and chip bag into the lake, and when his daughter protests about his littering, he explains that "it goes into the lake, and then it goes away, so it's not littering."
 
2011-04-06 12:17:53 PM
I'm sure there will be no problems with that storage solution for the 250,000 years it takes for plutonium to become safe.
 
2011-04-06 12:17:57 PM
Buttom?
Is that like a really smelly messy ass crack?
 
2011-04-06 12:18:01 PM
IN THE FUTURE, IT WILL BE SO BRIGHT WE'LL HAVE TO WEAR SHADES
 
2011-04-06 12:18:16 PM
Binary solo!
0000001 ^C
^C1 ^O
0000001 ^C
^C1 ^O
 
2011-04-06 12:18:43 PM
I had this idea a year ago. I think 1.2K may be a bit much, but I thought, why not just have a big ass hole that you can jetison the core into, cover it with cement, and forget the whole thing ever happened?

Whom do I contact for my royalty check?
 
2011-04-06 12:18:51 PM
IN FUTURE THERE WILL NO RADIATION. BRING FUTURE HERE.
 
2011-04-06 12:19:35 PM
They could probably make a reactor strong enough to take pretty much anything you can throw at it. The question is, do you want to pay $1 per hw/h?
 
2011-04-06 12:19:38 PM

meekychuppet: IN FUTURE, ALL NEW NUCLEAR REACTOR MUST BE BUILT OVER A 1.2 km hole.

Mongo like headline.


Candygram....Candygram for Mongo...
 
2011-04-06 12:20:18 PM
IN FUTURE, ALL CITIZENS TO REPORT TO CITY 17.
EVERYONE FROM FLORIDA TO REPORT DIRECTLY INTO OCEAN.
 
2011-04-06 12:20:23 PM
err kw/h
 
2011-04-06 12:20:46 PM
Why 1.2 km? Why not 1.3?
 
2011-04-06 12:22:02 PM
Anyone who spoofed the headline with a plural noun failed.
 
2011-04-06 12:22:39 PM
IN FUTURE, NO NEW. FIX OLD.
 
2011-04-06 12:23:06 PM
How about not building any more nuclear power plants?
 
2011-04-06 12:23:09 PM
IN THE FUTURE HARRISON FORD IS A ROBOT
 
2011-04-06 12:23:43 PM
"water problem is un-fixable. Stop trying. Let it run off into the Pacific."

reminds me of

"Who cares, it's done, end of story, will probably be fine"
 
2011-04-06 12:24:36 PM

nicoffeine: Why 1.2 km? Why not 1.3?


Because at 1.21KM your gonna see some really serious shiat.
 
2011-04-06 12:25:15 PM
IN FUTURE FARK TV WILL STILL SUCK.
 
2011-04-06 12:25:24 PM
So they'll eject the warp core?
 
2011-04-06 12:25:55 PM

IndyMBA: FTA: As the late, great comedian George Carlin once said, "think of how stupid the average person is, and then realize half of 'em are stupider than that." 95% of the ideas that run through our heads are moronic, as the internet basically proves. If you want to know how to fix a power plant, or do brain surgery, or predict the effects of climate change, then ask an actual expert. Because no amount of hot air balloons can save a bad idea.

Can't argue with that.


No, but you find out you are at a loss when you ask the actual experts, and it turns out they don't have a FARKING CLUE WHAT TO DO ABOUT THIS, apart from running around saying "Well, this could never happen with the more modern plants."

So, Vox populi fail. Expert fail. What next?
 
2011-04-06 12:27:54 PM
Weston, Nuclear Radiologist: "repair the reacters befor any thing else bad happiens"
 
2011-04-06 12:28:15 PM

Representative of Generation Y: How about not building any more nuclear power plants?


Why, nuclear plants are generally fine but this one happened to be in an area where natural disasters like a earthquake + tsunami style perfect storm can happen.
 
2011-04-06 12:28:18 PM

MythDragon: I had this idea a year ago. I think 1.2K may be a bit much, but I thought, why not just have a big ass hole that you can jetison the core into, cover it with cement, and forget the whole thing ever happened?

Whom do I contact for my royalty check?


Possibly because that is a terrible idea?
You know, just maybe.
 
2011-04-06 12:28:58 PM
Me no understand why reactor always in news. Why, why do they keep bringing up reactor? In future me hungry, me eat double quarter pounder with cheese, feel better about self.
 
2011-04-06 12:29:28 PM

tuffsnake: Representative of Generation Y: How about not building any more nuclear power plants?

Why, nuclear plants are generally fine but this one happened to be in an area where natural disasters like a earthquake + tsunami style perfect storm can happen.


More like this one just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. This kind of shiat happens once a century, if that.
 
2011-04-06 12:29:53 PM

nicoffeine: Why 1.2 km? Why not 1.3?


If you bury it too deep you'll create an army of radioactive mole men bent on the total destruction of the top-dwellers. Slightly shallower, and they become an army of nymphomaniac supermodels.
 
2011-04-06 12:30:01 PM
All reactors must be built spanning an active volcano or lava pit.
 
2011-04-06 12:30:33 PM
A thread related to the Japanese reactors and the Fark gzip.static.woot.comEVERYBODY PANIC gzip.static.woot.com Brigade isn't here yet?
 
Displayed 50 of 192 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all

View Voting Results: Smartest and Funniest


This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »






Report