If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Huffington Post) Obvious CNN's Nic Robertson in Libya, about Fox News: "When you come to somewhere like Libya, you expect lies and deceit from the dictatorship here. You don't expect it from the other journalists"   (huffingtonpost.com) divider line 297
More: Obvious, Nic Robertson, Fox News, CNN, Muammar Gaddafi, Libyan, Wolf Blitzer, British Army  
•       •       •

5070 clicks; posted to Politics » on 22 Mar 2011 at 1:16 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!



297 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all
 
2011-03-21 10:42:09 PM
There's your first mistake. You think they're journalists.
 
2011-03-21 10:48:44 PM
I loved this part myself.

FTA: He said that Fox News had in fact sent a non-editorial, non-technical member of its team to the tour. And he had harsh words for Harrigan himself. "If they had actually been there, Steve Harrigan the correspondent here is somebody I have known for many years, I see him more times at breakfast than I see him out on trips with government officials here," he said. "...We very rarely see the Fox News team..if I sound angry, it's because I am."

Sounds like Fox News "journalists" like to hide under their hotel room beds.

/When the going gets tough, Fox News goes missing.
 
2011-03-21 11:03:04 PM
Ahhhh... Fox News... Is there anything you can't f*ck up to fit into your narrow little narrative?
 
2011-03-21 11:05:34 PM
have they ever WATCHED Fox News?
 
2011-03-21 11:11:33 PM
www.indymedia.ie

What a scared fox may look like
 
2011-03-21 11:46:17 PM
Jesus Christ
 
2011-03-22 12:00:00 AM
What else have they been lying about?

media.skateboard.com.au

tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com
 
2011-03-22 12:21:28 AM
The sad thing is that none of this even matters anymore. Any audience that Fox can lose, they have lost. Speaking out against them is either preaching to the choir, falling on deaf ears, or part of the "both sides are bad" political noise machine than non-politicos believe.
 
2011-03-22 01:19:22 AM
In the immortal words of Herr Cheney:

So?
 
2011-03-22 01:21:05 AM
Shaggy_C: In the immortal words of Herr Cheney:

So?


That. Unfortunately.
 
2011-03-22 01:21:06 AM
Can anyone sum it up for me? Clicking Huffpost is disgusting.
 
2011-03-22 01:21:28 AM
If you don't expect lies and deceit from Fox News, you clearly haven't been paying attention.
 
2011-03-22 01:22:03 AM
If your "journalists" are too scared to report and just hide in the hotel rooms shiatting their pants, they can't be human shields.

So they have that going for them...

Besides, they don't really need to gather any facts, since they simply make them up.
 
2011-03-22 01:23:51 AM
"Journalists"?
 
2011-03-22 01:24:37 AM
Sooo, he got busted being used as a human shield and is now mad about it?
 
2011-03-22 01:26:58 AM
So, you're saying FoxNews journalists are as reliable as Kaddafi's mercenaries?
 
2011-03-22 01:29:53 AM
imgs.sfgate.com
 
2011-03-22 01:30:28 AM
Can he actually articulate why it was so important to go on a tour of Qaddaffi's palace or is he just going to keep screaming and throwing out accusations? If you hate Fox, fine, hate Fox, but there is a legitimate argument to be made that the Libyans are scheduling these tours to keep from being bombed whether Jennifer Griffin said it or not. What did he learn that he couldn't have by not going on the tour? Maybe there's a reason you don't see the Fox reporter there. He might know something you don't.

The fact that he admits he believes "government officials" from Libya just makes his credibility as a journalist look paper-thin. Did he believe everything Baghdad Bob told him too? Because he was a "government official?"
 
2011-03-22 01:35:06 AM
jyoders19: Can he actually articulate why it was so important to go on a tour of Qaddaffi's palace or is he just going to keep screaming and throwing out accusations? If you hate Fox, fine, hate Fox, but there is a legitimate argument to be made that the Libyans are scheduling these tours to keep from being bombed whether Jennifer Griffin said it or not. What did he learn that he couldn't have by not going on the tour? Maybe there's a reason you don't see the Fox reporter there. He might know something you don't.

The fact that he admits he believes "government officials" from Libya just makes his credibility as a journalist look paper-thin. Did he believe everything Baghdad Bob told him too? Because he was a "government official?"


So much FAIL in one post.

He claims Fox did send someone on the tour, so that invalidates your "point" about not participating in the OMGWTFHUMANSHIELD.

He didn't say he believed government officials from Libya. He explicitly called them liars.

Anything else you want to make up?
 
2011-03-22 01:35:39 AM
This just in: Fox News makes accurate statement about how reporter from CNN was used wittingly or unwittingly by Libya, and liberals whine about it.

As usual.
 
2011-03-22 01:37:20 AM
i1141.photobucket.com
 
2011-03-22 01:38:48 AM
randomjsa: This just in: Fox News makes accurate statement about how reporter from CNN was used wittingly or unwittingly by Libya, and liberals whine about it.

As usual.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MD_CjOSCyCU
 
2011-03-22 01:39:10 AM
mahuika: The sad thing is that none of this even matters anymore. Any audience that Fox can lose, they have lost..

^ This
 
2011-03-22 01:39:11 AM
For those who no longer wish to click on a Huffington Post link:

CNN (new window)
Baltimore Sun (new window)

/ ya hire Breitbart, expect to lose readership
// and I hope you don't gain clicks from the derp crowd . . .
 
2011-03-22 01:40:41 AM
as someone who spent drunken nights with a woman who went to the Columbia School of Journalism, i'd be getting a kick out of it if i didn't know the drastic failure of modern journalism

/dammit, i never remember to stick to the script.
//i'm amazed they even let me attempt to use memes
///tilted marks of punctuation
 
2011-03-22 01:50:37 AM
jyoders19: Maybe there's a reason you don't see the Fox reporter there.


There WAS someone from Fox there, you dumbshiat. That's the whole point of TFA.

Robertson: "(Fox) sent a member of their team. He was non-editorial. He was non-technical - not normally a cameraman. He was given a camera by the team and told to come out and come on the bus with the 40 other journalists who were there..."
 
2011-03-22 01:52:18 AM
So ... were journalists used as human shields or not?
 
2011-03-22 01:58:05 AM
randomjsa: This just in: Fox News makes accurate statement about how reporter from CNN was used wittingly or unwittingly by Libya, and liberals whine about it.

As usual.


This. Why can't the rest of you libterds just stand up and congratulate the crack Fox reporter for sniffing out the nefarious human shield plot that the 40 other professional journalists on the tour completely missed?
 
2011-03-22 01:58:26 AM
You Cant Explain That: mahuika: The sad thing is that none of this even matters anymore. Any audience that Fox can lose, they have lost..

^ This


Seconded.
 
2011-03-22 02:03:14 AM
bartink: jyoders19: Can he actually articulate why it was so important to go on a tour of Qaddaffi's palace or is he just going to keep screaming and throwing out accusations? If you hate Fox, fine, hate Fox, but there is a legitimate argument to be made that the Libyans are scheduling these tours to keep from being bombed whether Jennifer Griffin said it or not. What did he learn that he couldn't have by not going on the tour? Maybe there's a reason you don't see the Fox reporter there. He might know something you don't.

The fact that he admits he believes "government officials" from Libya just makes his credibility as a journalist look paper-thin. Did he believe everything Baghdad Bob told him too? Because he was a "government official?"

So much FAIL in one post.

He claims Fox did send someone on the tour, so that invalidates your "point" about not participating in the OMGWTFHUMANSHIELD.

He didn't say he believed government officials from Libya. He explicitly called them liars.

Anything else you want to make up?


How does that invalidate my point? They sent a non-editorial employee who WASN'T working on a story. Their credibility is a million times more intact than CNN's is. You don't know how a news network works, obviously.
 
2011-03-22 02:04:23 AM
shower_in_my_socks: jyoders19: Maybe there's a reason you don't see the Fox reporter there.


There WAS someone from Fox there, you dumbshiat. That's the whole point of TFA.

Robertson: "(Fox) sent a member of their team. He was non-editorial. He was non-technical - not normally a cameraman. He was given a camera by the team and told to come out and come on the bus with the 40 other journalists who were there..."


You have a non-editorial employee who DIDN'T file a story, then? You have nothing.
 
2011-03-22 02:05:03 AM
Irregardless: So ... were journalists used as human shields or not?

That's a big 10-4.
 
2011-03-22 02:05:05 AM
I'm an American. Yes I do. Especially if I'm watching Fox News. If you don't think that the news network is legitimate... you might as well be a terrorist, as Fox News dictates.

/their viewers took the term "n*gger" back from the merriam-webster dictionary, and incorporated it to mean 'tea party', their own, by strict definition
//how could you hate on that?!
 
2011-03-22 02:05:33 AM
jyoders19: They sent a non-editorial employee who WASN'T working on a story.

so they only become a human shield if they are an editorial reporter working on a story??

jyoders19: Their credibility

bwahahahahaha!!!!!
 
2011-03-22 02:08:02 AM
Again, I ask where's his story from the very important tour? What did he learn? Was Baghdad Bob there giving him the straight poop from very important government officials that he thinks Fox should talk to?
 
2011-03-22 02:09:26 AM
CorporatePerson: Can anyone sum it up for me? Clicking Huffpost is disgusting.

A useful idiot was upset and had a hissy fit on some never-watched cable show.
 
2011-03-22 02:10:13 AM
jyoders19: Again, I ask where's his story from the very important tour?

you're kinda slow ain't ya?
 
2011-03-22 02:11:26 AM
log_jammin: so they only become a human shield if they are an editorial reporter working on a story??

You'll notice that the only "human shield" accusation was from the only non-reporter in the entire group. Kind of makes you wonder about it, doesn't it?
 
2011-03-22 02:11:30 AM
log_jammin: jyoders19: They sent a non-editorial employee who WASN'T working on a story.

so they only become a human shield if they are an editorial reporter working on a story??

jyoders19: Their credibility

bwahahahahaha!!!!!

No, I think when they knew everyone else was going anyway they sent somebody who wasn't a reporter to be there with a camera to document that it was a waste of time and energy. People do this ALL the time with TV news. They take a stand by not sending their own talent and then send a "gotcha" camera to tape everyone else getting played.

You can scream FAIL and hook like a wild moonbat all you want, but that's standard operation procedure in TV news.
 
2011-03-22 02:12:23 AM
CNN's mad they got played. His rant confirms it.
 
2011-03-22 02:14:50 AM
jyoders19: CNN's mad they got played. His rant confirms it.

Yeah, that's it. The ONE guy there who isn't a journalist figured out the conspiracy the that the 40 other professional reporters didn't.
 
2011-03-22 02:15:39 AM
Do you think the British commanders are lying? You believe the Libyans but not the Brits? Really?

British sources confirmed that seven Storm Shadow missiles were ready to be fired from a British aircraft, but the strikes had to be curtailed due to crews from CNN, Reuters and other organizations nearby.

p.s. It's awesome that Tommy Arishikage has his own missile now.
 
2011-03-22 02:17:57 AM
cameroncrazy1984: You'll notice that the only "human shield" accusation was from the only non-reporter in the entire group. Kind of makes you wonder about it, doesn't it?

but he was non editorial!!!!
 
2011-03-22 02:18:15 AM
cameroncrazy1984: log_jammin: so they only become a human shield if they are an editorial reporter working on a story??

You'll notice that the only "human shield" accusation was from the only non-reporter in the entire group. Kind of makes you wonder about it, doesn't it?


Wrong, the "human shield" accusation was Jennifer Griffin, who very much IS a reporter and got the confirmation from the Brits that they had a missile strike planned. The non-editorial guy on the bus didn't do anything but confirm that the others were there. That was his whole job. See who sent their talent to the human shield beat.
 
2011-03-22 02:19:22 AM
Drew, you have let this tab turn into crap, seriously
 
2011-03-22 02:19:44 AM
jyoders19: cameroncrazy1984: log_jammin: so they only become a human shield if they are an editorial reporter working on a story??

You'll notice that the only "human shield" accusation was from the only non-reporter in the entire group. Kind of makes you wonder about it, doesn't it?

Wrong, the "human shield" accusation was Jennifer Griffin, who very much IS a reporter and got the confirmation from the Brits that they had a missile strike planned. The non-editorial guy on the bus didn't do anything but confirm that the others were there. That was his whole job. See who sent their talent to the human shield beat.


So wait a minute, the human shield accusation came from someone who wasn't even there?

Boy, that totally confirms it!

A) Send a guy who isn't a reporter with a bunch of reporters
B) Talk to the British
C) Have some chick who isn't there make something up

It's like a Fox News rubric.
 
2011-03-22 02:20:39 AM
jyoders19: No, I think when they knew everyone else was going anyway they sent somebody who wasn't a reporter to be there with a camera to document that it was a waste of time and energy.

yeah. you are slow.

Fox: "Libya is using CNN reporters as human shields. That's why we didn't go.

CNN: "Bullshiat. we weren't human shields and you guys DID have some one there"

You: "he didn't file a story lol"


jyoders19: CNN, Reuters and other organizations nearbyFOX.
 
2011-03-22 02:21:38 AM
As you can see here she's sticking by her report: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/jennifer-griffin-sticking-by-report-on-journ alists-being-used-as-human-shields-in-libya_b58495

She says she didn't know they sent a security guard with a camera but that really doesn't change one thing about her reporting of what the Brits told her.
 
2011-03-22 02:21:56 AM
jyoders19: The non-editorial guy on the bus didn't do anything but confirm that the others were there. That was his whole job. See who sent their talent to the human shield beat.

HA!
 
2011-03-22 02:22:47 AM
jyoders19: Again, I ask where's his story from the very important tour? What did he learn? Was Baghdad Bob there giving him the straight poop from very important government officials that he thinks Fox should talk to?

Tell me, if you were to write, say, a social history of Nazi Germany, would you rule out using "Triumph des Willens" as a primary source because it was just government propaganda?
 
Displayed 50 of 297 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | » | Last | Show all


This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »