If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Yahoo)   The media wants to know: Are Kate Middleton's knees too sharp?   (royalwedding.yahoo.com) divider line 43
    More: Misc, Kate Middleton, Prince Harry, palaces, Belfast, nutritionists  
•       •       •

5731 clicks; posted to Main » on 11 Mar 2011 at 1:21 AM (3 years ago)   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



43 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2011-03-11 01:22:28 AM  
Yes.
 
2011-03-11 01:26:49 AM  
Do I care?

No.
 
2011-03-11 01:26:52 AM  
Sure, why not?
 
2011-03-11 01:27:24 AM  
The prince has deemed the cushion to be adequate for the pushin'
 
2011-03-11 01:31:14 AM  
I'd totally hit it

i.dailymail.co.uk
 
2011-03-11 01:33:59 AM  
Of course she's going to be worried that she's too fat, It comes with the royal bride territory.
I think they should have married about 5 years ago, when William had a head of hair and Catherine was younger. They're 28! Pretty late to start a new branch of the family.
I remember whem Charles and Diana and Fergie and Andrew were the young royals. Now they have to see that moniker applied to their children.
 
2011-03-11 01:35:13 AM  
She's gorgeous, and also seems to be relatively down to earth with a good sense of humor.

I adore the British Royal family. I will wake up and watch this wedding. I will probably make scones to have with tea in my Charles and Diana commemorative wedding mug. I'm not even going to be embarrassed by it.*



*Well, maybe slightly but I'll get over it.
 
2011-03-11 01:38:55 AM  
sure i would, but not until after the marriage
 
2011-03-11 01:43:42 AM  
She's beautiful, people will biatch about anything.
 
2011-03-11 01:43:53 AM  

Gawdzila: I'd totally hit it


Her eyes are canted about 30 degrees off true. Maybe when William looks at her it reminds him of banking a RAF trainer into a turn?

I know, she has a "unique face", right?
 
2011-03-11 01:45:33 AM  

thefnz1: I know, she has a "unique face", right?


Put up your face and lets see how it looks.
 
2011-03-11 01:52:42 AM  
Yeah, I'm sure her ovaries are like shriveled little raisins at the age of 28. Idiot.
 
2011-03-11 01:54:58 AM  

thefnz1: Gawdzila: I'd totally hit it

Her eyes are canted about 30 degrees off true. Maybe when William looks at her it reminds him of banking a RAF trainer into a turn?

I know, she has a "unique face", right?


Bah, quit being a studman.
Nobody has a perfectly symmetrical face, and looking at hers...
www.sponkit.comwww.sponkit.comi.telegraph.co.uk

... I'd venture to say that, unique or not, most people would find her attractive.
Also, I have no frickin' clue where you're getting that "30 degrees off true" stuff. 30 degrees is a lot, and she doesn't look any less symmetrical than your average person.
 
2011-03-11 01:56:59 AM  

bartink: thefnz1: I know, she has a "unique face", right?

Put up your face and lets see how it looks.


Ugly and old with a grey beard, but she's trying to be a princess.

Guess they are all supposed to look inbred anyway.

Just was pointing out that focusing on weight is a bit narrow minded. Everybody has some asymmetry to their face, but she's at the upper end of the "normalish" range.
 
2011-03-11 02:11:33 AM  

thefnz1: Everybody has some asymmetry to their face, but she's at the upper end of the "normalish" range.


I actually think that's because you're seeing photos taken from so many angles. Have you seen what a photo call is like for them? It's not like there's one photographer there catching her from angle... there's hundreds and I bet they get all kinds of awkward looks.

Here's a video of one of their photo calls: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISuo54nSCGI

I think I'd go nuts and smash a camera, personally.
 
2011-03-11 02:15:57 AM  
I'm going to need some naked photos before I answer that question.
 
2011-03-11 02:41:10 AM  

MrEricSir: I'm going to need some naked photos before I answer that question.


Not naked, but hey... royal pokies.
Maybe or maybe not NSFW.


thefnz1: Everybody has some asymmetry to their face, but she's at the upper end of the "normalish" range.


Yeah... I don't see it.
 
2011-03-11 03:00:22 AM  
I didn't know what she looked like until this thread and she's very pretty. You know, for a British chick.

/Simmer down, I'm kidding. British women are lovely.
 
2011-03-11 03:02:03 AM  

Genevieve Marie: thefnz1: Everybody has some asymmetry to their face, but she's at the upper end of the "normalish" range.

I actually think that's because you're seeing photos taken from so many angles. Have you seen what a photo call is like for them? It's not like there's one photographer there catching her from angle... there's hundreds and I bet they get all kinds of awkward looks.

Here's a video of one of their photo calls: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISuo54nSCGI

I think I'd go nuts and smash a camera, personally.


I noticed that when the dude pasted the other pictures. Sorry, I'm a geek who doesn't look at the royal family much. The initial photo angle from Gawzila has a pretty good exaggeration of her eyes being off kilter because of the angle it was taken at.

I never worried about camera angles because I'm pretty sure nobody will ever ask me to photograph me for anything other than a drivers license and an obituary.
 
2011-03-11 03:41:34 AM  
Oh no, not another "she needs a sammich" Fark chubby chaser thread.

Thin chicks good, fat chicks bad.
 
2011-03-11 04:34:37 AM  
Please don't post garbage like this on Fark. It's bad enough I have to skim through it in the headlines on the news site, but why add it to a site that is supposed to aggregate the most interesting news?
 
2011-03-11 04:44:23 AM  
apparently you must be new around here scooter...



/it's not news, it's...
 
2011-03-11 05:09:30 AM  
www.myconfinedspace.com

/Never mind the German castle added in the background.
//Technically, Bavaria was a nation unto itself at the time it was built...
///Mad King Ludwig II FTW!
///slashies
 
2011-03-11 05:23:39 AM  

MrEricSir: I'm going to need some naked photos before I answer that question.


Seriously though, the gallery of pics that we are supposed to use to judge that question all show her wearing an overcoat. Couldn't they include ANY other pictures of her?

/virgule
 
2011-03-11 06:10:12 AM  
She's hot. Period. And some guys here have a serious case of teh ghey. Sorry, but you do.
 
2011-03-11 06:17:29 AM  
Sorry, but she's smokin'
 
2011-03-11 06:34:15 AM  
1. She's totally hot. 2. She's the type of girl that would never have anything to do with me (which is...most of them). 3. Why do we care about these people so much?
 
2011-03-11 08:00:50 AM  
She does seem to have dropped a few pounds since the wedding planning started, but that happens to a lot of girls just from nerves. Before the engagement, I always thought she looked like a perfect healthy weight.
 
2011-03-11 08:01:30 AM  
She's very good-looking, but not Diana-pretty to my taste. Chin's a touch too big, nose is a teensy bit potatoey, eyes are smallish. Great teeth for a Brit, though; either she won the genetic lottery or they've decided that orthodontia is OK now.

She should enjoy being skinny. After she has a couple of kids, I bet she's gonna turn into one of those English dumplings like the Queen Mum.

Poor Wills looks more like his Uncle Edward every day. He should just go cueball, maybe with a goatee and some tats.

/Making fun of the appearance of people far wealthier, more powerful and vastly better looking than oneself is FUN! Thank you, Internets!
 
2011-03-11 08:02:23 AM  

Genevieve Marie: She's gorgeous, and also seems to be relatively down to earth with a good sense of humor.

I adore the British Royal family. I will wake up and watch this wedding. I will probably make scones to have with tea in my Charles and Diana commemorative wedding mug. I'm not even going to be embarrassed by it.*

I don't have the cups, but I'll probably be there with you on the rest. Charles and Diana's wedding is one of my earliest memories of a Big Televised Event.


*Well, maybe slightly but I'll get over it.

 
2011-03-11 08:19:25 AM  
Absolutely not! I'd break her like a wishbone! She is gorgeous.

/fap
 
2011-03-11 08:25:24 AM  
Bah, who cares!? Silly limeys. Now, where's the thread on Beiber's latest exploits.
 
2011-03-11 08:34:31 AM  

Gawdzila: thefnz1: Gawdzila: I'd totally hit it

Her eyes are canted about 30 degrees off true. Maybe when William looks at her it reminds him of banking a RAF trainer into a turn?

I know, she has a "unique face", right?

Bah, quit being a studman.
Nobody has a perfectly symmetrical face, and looking at hers...


... I'd venture to say that, unique or not, most people would find her attractive.
Also, I have no frickin' clue where you're getting that "30 degrees off true" stuff. 30 degrees is a lot, and she doesn't look any less symmetrical than your average person.


I have to agree. Not terribly symmetrical but in those shots, anyway, attractive. I've seen eyes so wonky they lend the person a mildly retarded aspect. This lady doesn't look Simple Jack in the least.
 
2011-03-11 08:55:20 AM  
Jesus Christ, media, knock it off with that sexist shiat. Her weight is not "a topic of discussion and concern" to anyone except yourselves.
 
2011-03-11 09:36:48 AM  
I just hope she brings hats back.

/all, that is.
 
2011-03-11 10:28:33 AM  
I give her a Royal Rogering old chap.
 
2011-03-11 11:50:19 AM  
img2.newser.com
'S all good from here.
 
2011-03-11 11:51:49 AM  

mbillips: Poor Wills looks more like his Uncle Edward every day. He should just go cueball, maybe with a goatee and some tats.


Maybe it won't be too early for King Chav by the time he ascends the throne.
 
2011-03-11 12:49:20 PM  
Seriously? I'm first?
img816.imageshack.us
 
2011-03-11 12:51:41 PM  
Damn you, RatMaster999!
/oh, the shame...
 
2011-03-11 02:32:58 PM  
Let's see what Fark's expert says on this

i142.photobucket.com

/how about this for "Seriously, first?"
 
2011-03-11 07:40:00 PM  
Since the sword and the stone one is already taken I'd wreck that so bad that Gordon Lightfoot would write a song about it
 
2011-03-12 03:42:32 PM  

RatMaster999: pic


Repeat ad infinitum.
 
Displayed 43 of 43 comments



This thread is archived, and closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »
On Twitter





In Other Media


  1. Links are submitted by members of the Fark community.

  2. When community members submit a link, they also write a custom headline for the story.

  3. Other Farkers comment on the links. This is the number of comments. Click here to read them.

  4. Click here to submit a link.

Report