If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Government Technology)   Lots of IT jobs to be available soon IF you can handle inconveniences like excellent pay and a pension   (govtech.com) divider line 320
    More: PSA, Under Pressure, pensions, Bureau of Labor Statistics, furloughs  
•       •       •

24049 clicks; posted to Main » on 27 Jan 2011 at 11:48 AM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



320 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread
 
2011-01-27 11:49:55 AM
I guess I could tell people to turn it off and on again all day..
 
2011-01-27 11:50:06 AM
The government will just fill those positions with private contractors via Haliburton.

Just like it does in the Middle-East.
 
2011-01-27 11:51:33 AM
netweavr: The government will just fill those positions with private contractors via Haliburton.

Yes, and those contractors are not employed by anyone, and work for free, damn them.
 
2011-01-27 11:51:35 AM
cbackous: I guess I could tell people to turn it off and on again all day..

Or have to call IT to plug in a mouse.

//Does the grunt IT work at my office, while the main IT guys sit at HQ a few hours away, in addition to regular stuff like software dev.
 
2011-01-27 11:52:02 AM
The military industrial complex strikes again, using our tax dollars to sit around and surf fark all day being a right wing troll is hard work, but someone's gotta do it.
 
2011-01-27 11:52:22 AM
"Reboot"

"Wait 15 minutes and try again"

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.
 
2011-01-27 11:53:27 AM
Where do I sign up?

//25, IT worker, loves job...not pay.
 
2011-01-27 11:54:43 AM
IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.
 
2011-01-27 11:55:10 AM
They will just look to India for Outsourcing a job that would pay my 70k a year for 20k.
 
2011-01-27 11:55:32 AM
The price is merely your soul and will to live. 30 years as a drone to earn a comfortable retirement for your hollowed out shell.

Only to find that the government no longer can borrow the money to pay for your retirement.
 
2011-01-27 11:55:58 AM
My brother works in university IT security and he's been saying this for years.
 
2011-01-27 11:56:19 AM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Yeah, that's the ticket. I think the legal secretaries here would totally know what to do about the DNS errors popping up in the event logs of our Exchange server resulting in occasional NDRs. The only reason they haven't learned all that stuff yet is because I'm just holding their hands.
 
2011-01-27 11:56:38 AM
LegacyDL Quote 2011-01-27 11:54:43 AM
IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


>>>


Bob we need to expand our wifi infrastructure and link up 2 remote offices securely.

Don't worry sir, I have IT figured out, I'll just search Google!

Brilliant! Fire IT and raises for all of us!
 
2011-01-27 11:58:19 AM
"Reboot"

"Wait 15 minutes and try again"

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.


I've worked for 3 very large corporations (fortune 50) and this has been the exact case in all scenarios. It took me 10 weeks to get my first system here, and that was the wrong one. So the real question is, "are you willing to sit on your smug, do-nothing butt all day, taking only one 3 hour lunch then trashing all your emails/voicemails and doing absolutely nothing?" Sign here:_______
 
2011-01-27 11:58:28 AM
JMel Quote 2011-01-27 11:52:22 AM

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.


>>>

Every time I call the help desk I want to smash my head in. But that's only because 15 hour wonders who couldn't tell you the difference between windows and mac and only read pre-determined sentences then submit a ticket to elevate the issue if their ignorance can't resolve it. most of the time they want to get you off the phone quickly so they can get back to surfing the web and talking on their cell phone.
 
2011-01-27 11:59:03 AM
And they will quit after 6 months because of the bullshiat 8570 rules and idiotic way we run things.
 
2011-01-27 11:59:21 AM
From the headline: "excellent pay"
From the article: "Government continues to have trouble competing with higher salaries in the private sector"
 
2011-01-27 11:59:29 AM
Pensions help maintain quality of life, if only we could get the people who promise to fund them to fund them... really complex stuff.
 
2011-01-27 11:59:47 AM
AcneVulgaris: The price is merely your soul and will to live. 30 years as a drone to earn a comfortable retirement for your hollowed out shell.

Only to find that the government no longer can borrow the money to pay for your retirement.


What if I told you 'insane' was working fifty hours a week in some office for fifty years at the end of which they tell you to piss off; ending up in some retirement village hoping to die before suffering the indignity of trying to make it to the toilet on time? Wouldn't you consider that to be insane?
 
2011-01-27 12:00:10 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


Know how I know you don't know what you're talking about?
 
2011-01-27 12:00:10 PM
You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...
 
2011-01-27 12:01:10 PM
That's great if the "Grey Ceiling" (people who won't retire) really retires. It's not likely.
 
2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...
 
2011-01-27 12:01:53 PM
The average private sector worker gets about $60k/y if you count salary + benefits. The average government worker gets almost double that because of the ridiculous taxpayer-funded benefits and pensions.

We're broke.
 
2011-01-27 12:01:59 PM
It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.
 
2011-01-27 12:02:05 PM
dalevywasbri: Pensions help maintain quality of life, if only we could get the people who promise to fund them to fund them... really complex stuff.

It's hard, because divide and conquer is so effective.

If I'm some dude making 20K working in a warehouse; why do I give a damn whether or not some college-educated teacher making 68K a year gets a pension? I'm not going to get a pension whether she does or not. There's nothing in it for me.

So when some RW politician comes along and tells me that he's gonna stick it to those "parasites," I get amped up.

You know why... because no one is fighting for a real universal pension. Social Security is a joke. They don't even pretend it's adequate anymore.
 
2011-01-27 12:02:15 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs Linux all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

//FTFY
//Oh Shiat, they're the same thing now.
 
2011-01-27 12:03:41 PM
The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.
 
2011-01-27 12:04:56 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


Nope, they are still too lazy, even after learning it.

People ask me my IT secrets, and I tell them "Google". They still call my desk before calling the "official" IT people.
 
2011-01-27 12:05:43 PM
Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.


If your network is set up properly this is a non issue. Virus on your computer? Reimage it tonight. Problem solved.
 
2011-01-27 12:06:08 PM
I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.
 
2011-01-27 12:06:32 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


Therein lies the problem. Sure you can "Google" how tos for certain things, but if you don't really know what you're doing you can end up making things worse.

IT Professionals (not your "geeks") understand the principles behind issues, not just following instructions on how to remedy them.

The people who call IT and are told to reboot and then berate them because it seems too simple a solution are also the same people too dumb to realize they actually don't have an issue. :P
 
2011-01-27 12:07:59 PM
The_Pirate: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.

If your network is set up properly this is a non issue. Virus on your computer? Reimage it tonight. Problem solved.


That'd be nice. Ours is a hodgepodge. I'm just a warm body to press keys, but everything else requires shipping the computer to HQ(they won't give me the image for some odd reason), and waiting.

It's also damn near impossible to get people to trust the server for storage of work, even though the server has never gone *poof* like their computers have.
 
2011-01-27 12:09:24 PM
Parent's basements will soon empty of unemployed geeks that attended college but couldn't get a job at starbucks because they were "over qualified".
 
2011-01-27 12:09:41 PM
bulok: The people who call IT and are told to reboot and then berate them because it seems too simple a solution are also the same people too dumb to realize they actually don't have an issue. :P

.... You're Welcome!!!
 
2011-01-27 12:10:30 PM
RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

That is all they are exposed to, the help desk side of things.

I love when I get to do actual IT stuff and not just help desk, but it is pretty rare anymore.
 
2011-01-27 12:11:09 PM
xynix:
It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.
 
2011-01-27 12:11:19 PM
Eshkar: Parent's basements will soon empty of unemployed geeks that attended college but couldn't get a job at starbucks because they were "over qualified".

That's a bit optimistic.

The coveted government jobs will go to 2 categories of people:

(1) the uberexperienced techmasters who are working in positions beneath them.
(2) the well-connected.

Recent grads are, as always, screwed.
 
2011-01-27 12:12:17 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

notsureifserious.jpg
 
2011-01-27 12:12:18 PM
meat0918: The_Pirate: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.

If your network is set up properly this is a non issue. Virus on your computer? Reimage it tonight. Problem solved.

That'd be nice. Ours is a hodgepodge. I'm just a warm body to press keys, but everything else requires shipping the computer to HQ(they won't give me the image for some odd reason), and waiting.

It's also damn near impossible to get people to trust the server for storage of work, even though the server has never gone *poof* like their computers have.


Yeah. There's not much you can do if the network was set up improperly in the first place. My company does managed it services and I have to deal with this shiat every day because they refuse to force users to store info on the servers.
 
2011-01-27 12:12:43 PM
RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

Of course it isn't just that. Ours frequently likes to change around the server names and software license locations without telling anyone. Which oddly then spurs more Help Desk calls....
 
2011-01-27 12:13:00 PM
flaminio: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

notsureifserious.jpg


He's probably serious... And wrong.
 
2011-01-27 12:16:03 PM
RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.
This.
 
2011-01-27 12:16:25 PM
"The flash player plugin has crashed."
 
2011-01-27 12:16:42 PM
Hair Salad: RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.
This.


TROOF
 
2011-01-27 12:17:18 PM
HotSalsaZoot: Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.


You're talking about DBAs. That's one tiny aspect of IT. Trust me, people that actually know system and network architecture are making more than ever.
 
2011-01-27 12:17:26 PM
The_Gallant_Gallstone: It's hard, because divide and conquer is so effective.

If I'm some dude making 20K working in a warehouse; why do I give a damn whether or not some college-educated teacher making 68K a year gets a pension? I'm not going to get a pension whether she does or not. There's nothing in it for me.

So when some RW politician comes along and tells me that he's gonna stick it to those "parasites," I get amped up.

You know why... because no one is fighting for a real universal pension. Social Security is a joke. They don't even pretend it's adequate anymore.


AFAIK that is not the argument. the argument is two fold.

First they cut down the tax progression and create what is euphemistically referred to as a "larger tax base" or as anyone with an understanding of the English language would refer to it they tax poor people more. They proceed to throw their arms up in the air and proclaim they can't possibly pay for it now. (The ultimate extension of this is called the "Fair Tax")

Second they start to rip unions and how they hurt production and this and that. Ultimately people get duped because they don't get both sides of the story, yea unions do decrease production. But production is only as good as its increase to the quality of life, which unions do (ie you are happier if you have more control/flexibility with regards to hours and what not) so they are asking to you exchange happiness for consumer happiness... its a shiat deal. And people get all jacked up and call other people selfish.
 
2011-01-27 12:17:27 PM
IT worker. Just got a 5% raise


/woot!
 
2011-01-27 12:17:36 PM
FTFA subby: Government continues to have trouble competing with higher salaries in the private sector and restrictions in the civil service system, Grant said. "More than 78 percent of state CIOs confirmed that state salary rates and pay grade structures present a challenge in attracting and retaining skilled IT talent," the report said.
 
2011-01-27 12:18:39 PM
Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.


Your IT department sucks. Virus outbreak? Spyware? Not in a looooong time, sparky. A proper MS network with proper safeguards and proper GP restrictions doesn't really have a problem with this. I haven't seen one in at least seven years and I support ~4000 machines in an educational environment. Is it perfect? Naw. But, I can just about guarantee neither is your mythical OSX land of puppies and kittens where the pillows are oh so fluffy. I'm not automatically a MacOS hater, but most enterprise level software isn't written for it and most people don't know how to use it. You have to support the world you live in, not the one you wish you did.

/State IT worker getting a kick.
 
ZAZ [TotalFark]
2011-01-27 12:18:45 PM
Grant said the state IT work force is slightly older than the federal IT work force, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics - so retirements should hit the states first.

Some states have been pushing early retirement so it's possible the people who are likely to retire the moment they can have already taken a buyout.
 
2011-01-27 12:18:51 PM
Many older IT workers postponed their retirement when the economy turned south, but they will still eventually leave.

So they do not in fact possess the gift of immortality - thank you for that useful piece of information.
 
2011-01-27 12:19:45 PM
Hmmm... State IT work != great pay. The article did say that states had problems getting and retaining good IT workers because they couldn't match private industry wages. Plus the fact that most states have older IT infrastructure to begin with, they tend to keep equipment in us for far longer than is reasonable, and when they do replace equipment, the bidding process pretty much ensures that the new installation will use proprietary hardware that does not meet private companies standards, it will be overpriced, and it will be undersupported. Training will be cursory, so when anything mildly complex happens, the vendor will be called in to "consult" on the issue.

Just as an example. 10 years ago I was brought in for a tour of the Kansas City (yes, I know this is a city, not state. It's just an example of government sluggishness overall) IT department, including the data center. They were still using Token Ring networks (and not the UTP cabling type, but the Coax type), and the servers were mostly old P2 servers running NT 4.51, with a few newer boxes with Server 2000 where new projects required it. Not a great setup.
 
2011-01-27 12:20:29 PM
Geotpf: From the headline: "excellent pay"
From the article: "Government continues to have trouble competing with higher salaries in the private sector"


I call bullshiat. Many cities/states now have databases that show public employee salaries. If those wages are not competitive, the private sector IT guys must be making a farkton of cash.
 
2011-01-27 12:20:58 PM
The avg gov worker does not make 2x private to the dbag above. Bullshiat x2 on that. In reality you trade great pay for job security, that is about the only thing that is a benefit in working for the gov (state/fed). You don't read the news one day and figure out your co was full of shiat and the stock is now worth 50 cents and you don't have a job. With the Gov, you already knew that, but you aren't gonna get cut.
 
2011-01-27 12:21:45 PM
GS-9 IT worker here.

Never too busy to post on Fark!
 
2011-01-27 12:22:37 PM
HotSalsaZoot: Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.


It depends on the company. Some companies pay their IT for shiat and treat them like shiat, and it shows. The companies I've done work for treat their employees very well. Not the uber gods that they were once treated as, though.
 
2011-01-27 12:22:42 PM
FTFAFor several years state governments have warned that the graying of the baby boom generation would result in a "retirement wave" of public-sector employees whose institutional knowledge wouldn't be easily replaced.


That's a bad thing? I imagine a lot of those old geezers are part of the problem. Get some young blood in there and see how they can streamline things for more efficiency.

As to all the IT bashers in this thread: Call Centers and Help Desk does not encompass all of IT thankyouverymuch.
 
2011-01-27 12:23:04 PM
godofusa.com: The average private sector worker gets about $60k/y if you count salary + benefits. The average government worker gets almost double that because of the ridiculous taxpayer-funded benefits and pensions.

We're broke.


yeah, none of that is accurate.

/Government worker
//Does not make double $60k
///Does not have a pension, we get 401k matching like everyone else
////We pay about what everyone else pays for benefits
////slashies
 
2011-01-27 12:23:13 PM
I work for a government agency

and I'm currently teaching intro to computer classes / office training for employees

we have a woman who saves all her documents into a single word document.... and scrolls....

So yeah, an IT department is needed because apparently some people can't be trusted to google.
 
2011-01-27 12:23:33 PM
Geotpf: From the headline: "excellent pay"
From the article: "Government continues to have trouble competing with higher salaries in the private sector"


It's the benefits that really sell it. The US government doesn't skimp on benefits.
 
2011-01-27 12:23:47 PM
netweavr: The government will just fill those positions with private contractors via Haliburton.

Just like it does in the Middle-East.


I work for the State of CA and at 33 I am the youngest in my work group and as you look around IT, all you see are bald heads and gray hair. The stat is something like 65-75% of staff are within 5 years of retirement.

There have been many hiring freezes so there are not many younger workers in California.

The age of the department is apparent in the equipment that was installed and the policies in place. They actually said wireless was scary. Even with WPA2 AES encryption, web authentication and for our transactions we have the software encrypted and the connection is encrypted.
 
2011-01-27 12:24:12 PM
RFC 1925

Network Working Group R. Callon, Editor
Request for Comments: 1925 IOOF
Category: Informational 1 April 1996

The Twelve Networking Truths

Status of this Memo

This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

This memo documents the fundamental truths of networking for the
Internet community. This memo does not specify a standard, except in
the sense that all standards must implicitly follow the fundamental
truths.

Acknowledgements

The truths described in this memo result from extensive study over an
extended period of time by many people, some of whom did not intend
to contribute to this work. The editor merely has collected these
truths, and would like to thank the networking community for
originally illuminating these truths.

1. Introduction

This Request for Comments (RFC) provides information about the
fundamental truths underlying all networking. These truths apply to
networking in general, and are not limited to TCP/IP, the Internet,
or any other subset of the networking community.

2. The Fundamental Truths

(1) It Has To Work.

(2) No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority,
you can't increase the speed of light.

(2a) (corollary). No matter how hard you try, you can't make a
baby in much less than 9 months. Trying to speed this up
*might* make it slower, but it won't make it happen any
quicker.

(3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is
not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they
are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them
as they fly overhead.

(4) Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor
understood unless experienced firsthand. Some things in
networking can never be fully understood by someone who neither
builds commercial networking equipment nor runs an operational
network.

(5) It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems
into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases
this is a bad idea.

(6) It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving
the problem to a different part of the overall network
architecture) than it is to solve it.

(6a) (corollary). It is always possible to add another level of
indirection.

(7) It is always something

(7a) (corollary). Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't
have all three).

(8) It is more complicated than you think.

(9) For all resources, whatever it is, you need more.

(9a) (corollary) Every networking problem always takes longer to
solve than it seems like it should.

(10) One size never fits all.

(11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and
a different presentation, regardless of whether it works.

(11a) (corollary). See rule 6a.

(12) In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there
is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take
away.

Security Considerations

This RFC raises no security issues. However, security protocols are
subject to the fundamental networking truths.

References

The references have been deleted in order to protect the guilty and
avoid enriching the lawyers.
 
2011-01-27 12:24:24 PM
I've been planning on taking courses at the local community college to get my Microsoft Certification, so this is good news to me.
 
2011-01-27 12:24:28 PM
John Paul Jones: HotSalsaZoot: Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.

You're talking about DBAs. That's one tiny aspect of IT. Trust me, people that actually know system and network architecture are making more than ever.


Also, the days of just taking a few classes and expecting a bunch of money are over because there are a lot more people that know how to do all this stuff. If you have good experience and can understand how to do more than the textbooks show, you can make decent money. If you can combine it with knowledge of another field (such as finance) you can be invaluable, since most IT people only know IT.
 
2011-01-27 12:24:39 PM
Your Black Muslim Credit Union: In reality you trade great pay for job security, that is about the only thing that is a benefit in working for the gov (state/fed).

Assuming you're highly skilled. If you're not highly skilled, the government as an employer is even more attractive.
 
2011-01-27 12:24:44 PM
GookNukem: You have to support the world you live in, not the one you wish you did.

Quoted For Truth

(Even though I love my Macs/OS X and have seen them widely used in a university setting, I don't think they're appropriate as the sole solution for a large enterprise.)
 
2011-01-27 12:24:54 PM
godofusa.com: The average private sector worker gets about $60k/y if you count salary + benefits. The average government worker gets almost double that because of the ridiculous taxpayer-funded benefits and pensions.

We're broke.


hufnmouth: That's great if the "Grey Ceiling" (people who won't retire) really retires. It's not likely.

Well, yes and no. They'll retire, start drawing their pension and then get hired back with a different title, doing the same job at the their old salary, plus drawing the pension. It's called double-dipping and is illegal in a lot of places. Not enforced much because the enforcers use the same trick.

/Another reason we're going broke, really fast
 
2011-01-27 12:25:05 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

If you think your average office worker has difficulty with a PC, hand them a Mac.

Us:
"That's not compatible with Mac."
"We don't support Mac."
"You have to run it in a Windows emulator."

Them:
"What's a 'web browser'? Is that Google/Bing?"
"My 'Start' button, what's that?"
"It's asking for my network login. It's never done that. I'm going to reboot."
"I just clicked okay on the errors, but no one has called me yet."

As long as there are non-IT people, you will need IT people and support departments. If you think the "Help Desk" is helpless, it's because the Help Desk doesn't like you and knows you're a complete moron.

Shut up and reboot.

ID-10 T error.
 
2011-01-27 12:25:29 PM
Jim DiGriz: Hmmm... State IT work != great pay. The article did say that states had problems getting and retaining good IT workers because they couldn't match private industry wages. Plus the fact that most states have older IT infrastructure to begin with, they tend to keep equipment in us for far longer than is reasonable, and when they do replace equipment, the bidding process pretty much ensures that the new installation will use proprietary hardware that does not meet private companies standards, it will be overpriced, and it will be undersupported. Training will be cursory, so when anything mildly complex happens, the vendor will be called in to "consult" on the issue.

Just as an example. 10 years ago I was brought in for a tour of the Kansas City (yes, I know this is a city, not state. It's just an example of government sluggishness overall) IT department, including the data center. They were still using Token Ring networks (and not the UTP cabling type, but the Coax type), and the servers were mostly old P2 servers running NT 4.51, with a few newer boxes with Server 2000 where new projects required it. Not a great setup.


Also I totally second this

We can't even run the newest version of office on the few macs we have, b/c our server is too old to be compatible. It's sad. We also still have a machine that uses DOS. It's horrible. They won't spend the money b/c the tax payers would freak.
 
2011-01-27 12:25:30 PM
Im a Government IT worker so Im really getting a kick...
 
2011-01-27 12:25:46 PM
Jobber8742: ///Does not have a pension, we get 401k matching like everyone else

You living in one of those red states?
 
2011-01-27 12:26:26 PM
RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

Add another to the "this" chorus.

Threads like these, and the attitudes, ignorance and arrogance expressed in them are just another reminder of the horrible way IT people are typically treated... the last group that is socially acceptable to mock and deride to their face... even lawyers get more respect culturally. "I set up my home PC just fine - you must be an idiot!" Ugh.

That said, I'll believe the job boom when I see it. Anybody in Balto/DC need a warm body to fill an abuse-laden and under-appreciated position? Sigh.
 
2011-01-27 12:27:01 PM
Macs in an enterprise environment? How are those Xserves working out for you 'hybrid' shops?

Also, after 10 years in the industry and putting in my time on a helpdesk I can say with certainty that you all get shiatty support because your employer either outsourced your helpdesk, or the domestic helpdesk you have is vastly underpaid because outsourcing tanked good support staff's market value.

You get what you pay for. 10 years ago it was possible to make a good living just taking inbound support calls and being good at it. Now, most help desks are treated the same as call centers, as though troubleshooting were exactly the same as customer service... Smart people will not work in this environment for long.

Helpdesks used to be like the Farm team of IT. Young guys/gals got hired in and either sank or swam. The ones who could swim got that 1-3 years of experience that was required to get an analyst or senior level position, then the 3-5 required for an admin level position, then the 5+ for an engineering level position. It worked out for me, but, that same path is nearly impossible to take now in most of the industry.
 
2011-01-27 12:27:59 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

i12.photobucket.com
 
2011-01-27 12:30:21 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Smart people will not work in this environment for long.

They will if they have no other choice.
 
2011-01-27 12:30:32 PM
Jobber8742: godofusa.com: The average private sector worker gets about $60k/y if you count salary + benefits. The average government worker gets almost double that because of the ridiculous taxpayer-funded benefits and pensions.

We're broke.

yeah, none of that is accurate.

/Government worker
//Does not make double $60k
///Does not have a pension, we get 401k matching like everyone else
////We pay about what everyone else pays for benefits
////slashies


Maybe you personally, but on average, a US government worker gets 40k in benefits, a private employee 10k. Why do you think government at a federal and state level has over 1 trillion dollars in underfunded pension obligations alone?
 
2011-01-27 12:30:33 PM
Yeah osx, real great for a large business; spend twice the cash to get an OS/Hardware that you will have to boot to win7 (buy a license key too) to get some of the shiat you need to do anyway. Linux: flashy desktop interface (make it look like OSX and fool half the morons), solid servers. Run it on good hardware with a semi competent IT staff and you are doing much better for your $.
 
2011-01-27 12:31:00 PM
The_Gallant_Gallstone: Jobber8742: ///Does not have a pension, we get 401k matching like everyone else

You living in one of those red states?


nope Federal Government. We do have other aspects to our retirement plan, but the TSP (401k) matching is the main aspect. The days of putting in your 30 years and getting 60% of your pay in a pension are gone for us newer employees. What you always hear about are the older people around here, they did not have it taken away when it was changed. They'll still get that sweet deal.
 
2011-01-27 12:33:59 PM
SFSailor: Threads like these, and the attitudes, ignorance and arrogance expressed in them are just another reminder of the horrible way IT people are typically treated... the last group that is socially acceptable to mock and deride to their face... even lawyers get more respect culturally. "I set up my home PC just fine - you must be an idiot!" Ugh.

And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."
 
2011-01-27 12:34:40 PM
As someone who is starting his masters in computer engineering this summer...I'm actually getting a kick out of this.

/utter terror replaced with cautious optimism?
 
2011-01-27 12:35:10 PM
obzerver: IT worker. Just got a 5% raise


/woot!


IT worker, 15+ years experience. Just changed jobs and took a %40 pay hike.
Who said the glory days are over?
 
2011-01-27 12:35:34 PM
BigMevy: SFSailor: Threads like these, and the attitudes, ignorance and arrogance expressed in them are just another reminder of the horrible way IT people are typically treated... the last group that is socially acceptable to mock and deride to their face... even lawyers get more respect culturally. "I set up my home PC just fine - you must be an idiot!" Ugh.

And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."


I tell them to stop looking at porn.
 
2011-01-27 12:35:38 PM
bump: "Reboot"

"Wait 15 minutes and try again"

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.

I've worked for 3 very large corporations (fortune 50) and this has been the exact case in all scenarios. It took me 10 weeks to get my first system here, and that was the wrong one. So the real question is, "are you willing to sit on your smug, do-nothing butt all day, taking only one 3 hour lunch then trashing all your emails/voicemails and doing absolutely nothing?" Sign here:_______


There are different aspects of IT, and lots of depth. The people and situations you are describing are of a helpdesk employee. They represent the kiddie pool next to the Olympic sized pool. They have their own issues. I think the article is talking about more technical IT folk, the ones in the deep end of the Olympic pool.

/I am such a technical folk
 
2011-01-27 12:35:45 PM
RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

I believe this is part of the problem. If IT does their job well, and the servers/services keep working correctly, all the end users see the IT staff doing is help desk. I've had people demand that I not wear headphones and listen to music because they might have a problem, and just want to be able to yell at me. They have no idea that we spend most of our time keeping things running smoothly...er...in theory.
 
2011-01-27 12:36:33 PM
>> Lots of IT jobs to be available soon

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

clip - Information technology has turned into one of the biggest job-growth disappointments of all time.

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_39/b4002001.htm
 
2011-01-27 12:37:00 PM
RussianPooper: Also, the days of just taking a few classes and expecting a bunch of money are over because there are a lot more people that know how to do all this stuff. If you have good experience and can understand how to do more than the textbooks show, you can make decent money. If you can combine it with knowledge of another field (such as finance) you can be invaluable, since most IT people only know IT.

I have to disagree. People may have more gadgets and understand computer basics but they are still just as clueless. You won't have to show them how to use word but anything outside of the absolute basics are foreign still. More connected and plugged in does not mean they know what they are doing.
 
2011-01-27 12:37:22 PM
BigMevy:
And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."


I heart you so much.
 
2011-01-27 12:37:57 PM
I know of a lot of fellow ArcGIS Analyst/Developers that are about to retire. These old bastards have been around since the Avenue/AML days and have left a mountain of code update work for the next generation to sort out.

Municipal and State government mapping departments, however, aren't the best GIS positions out there; get a job with an Electric Membership Cooperative like I did and you'll strike paydirt.
 
2011-01-27 12:38:03 PM
And as a side gripe....as bad as the economy is, I would think it would be easier to find good developers. I am having such a hard time finding a good Java developer. They just don't seem to be unemployed at all. Any advice on where to look?
 
2011-01-27 12:38:13 PM
Jobber8742: What you always hear about are the older people around here, they did not have it taken away when it was changed. They'll still get that sweet deal.

Plot bloody rebellion. Join the PSL or grin and bear it.

JoeCamelToe: I tell them to stop looking at porn.

You sound female.
 
2011-01-27 12:38:35 PM
As someone who does IT for the government I'm getting a kick...
 
2011-01-27 12:38:51 PM
If you aren't getting a positive response from your IT department, maybe it has something to do with you. Maybe you are high maintenance. Maybe you keep screwing things up, because you don't know the difference between a computer and a box of rocks. Maybe it is your attitude.

The problem with outsourcing is that you end up paying $50/hr for a low level technician who only earns $15/hr. That's not an exaggeration of the mark up. The contract company has to pay their workers the going rate, they have overhead, and they want to make a hefty profit. Any company or agency that has enough work to justify it is better off hiring in house IT.
 
2011-01-27 12:39:17 PM
Don't forget the mindless and massive bureaucracy, the ungodly amounts of wasted money, acres of cubicle farms, a higher proportion of clinically brain-dead employees, and a socially sterilized work environment.

Other than that, it's a good living.
 
2011-01-27 12:39:47 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).


because google can help a complete technical novice to set up a series of linux servers, or an entire network ,DNS, nameservers, or countless other things that IT actually does besides fix little problems for the stupid and/or uninitiated. you're retarded
 
2011-01-27 12:39:56 PM
ventmonkey: And as a side gripe....as bad as the economy is, I would think it would be easier to find good developers. I am having such a hard time finding a good Java developer. They just don't seem to be unemployed at all. Any advice on where to look?

By "good" do you "unattainably perfect given the meager wage I'm offering"?

I'm not saying that's the case, but part of this economic death we're experiencing involves employers expecting demigods to work for practically nothing.
 
2011-01-27 12:40:11 PM
hufnmouth: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs Linux all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

//FTFY
//Oh Shiat, they're the same thing now.


Not if you factor in price.
 
2011-01-27 12:41:00 PM
What working in IT is really like.

Link (new window)

Used to work for a boss stupider than Jen.
 
2011-01-27 12:41:04 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

How bout I produce some foot in your ASS??!?!?!?!

gullyborg.typepad.com
 
2011-01-27 12:41:10 PM
HotSalsaZoot: xynix:
It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.


I am a DBA and with only a mid-range experience and making your $65-80k as most DBAs I know are (and I am involved in many DBA user groups). From all the articles I am reading the demand for both data professionals (DBAs, architects, etc.) and IT security officials is expected to dramatically increase in the next 10 years. You don't realize how many small to mid-size business like law firms, medical offices, etc. still have no IT infrastructure at all.
 
2011-01-27 12:41:12 PM
My first ten years in the workforce I did a number of IT jobs, some enjoyable, some not. Then one day I realized I had been doing the same repairs and upgrades for two years and even though i occasionally got the chance to program or at least script a little I had hit the wall. Wasn't on the management track, had a good reputation as a troubleshooter but the challenge just wasn't there anymore.

So I took a 'sabbatical' and drove a Boston taxi for a little over a year. Best move I ever made. Learned 15 ways to get to Fenway Paaahk at rush hour. Tried every diner from Southie to Somerville. Cleared my head out real good. Got my next IT job driving that cab. But I got downsized two years later, which was a real shame; that was a great gig.
 
2011-01-27 12:41:41 PM
Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.


Your IT department doesn't know how to secure their network. PCs on our managed network very seldom get viruses, and if they do, the IT dept knows about it before the user does. In 8 years, I have seen ONE virus effect one of our servers, and that's because it was new and Symantec hadn't seen it yet. Within 4 hours of it being noticed by one of the server guys, Symantec had a patch out and added it to their automatic updates.
 
2011-01-27 12:41:45 PM
ventmonkey: RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

I believe this is part of the problem. If IT does their job well, and the servers/services keep working correctly, all the end users see the IT staff doing is help desk. I've had people demand that I not wear headphones and listen to music because they might have a problem, and just want to be able to yell at me. They have no idea that we spend most of our time keeping things running smoothly...er...in theory.


I work in Network Infrastructure so what I do is sitting and typing or after work hours or on holidays, weekends, etc. So during the week if I am not running around people assume I am doing nothing even if I was there until 10 pm the night before or worked all weekend.
 
2011-01-27 12:43:01 PM
The_Gallant_Gallstone: Jobber8742: What you always hear about are the older people around here, they did not have it taken away when it was changed. They'll still get that sweet deal.

Plot bloody rebellion. Join the PSL or grin and bear it.

JoeCamelToe: I tell them to stop looking at porn.

You sound female.


Oh, I'm not complaining about our retirement. I just hate when people complain about us Government employees get this sweet pension when really the policy was changed over 20 years ago. A raise would be nice, but you jerks put an end to that.
 
2011-01-27 12:43:19 PM
The_Gallant_Gallstone: ventmonkey: And as a side gripe....as bad as the economy is, I would think it would be easier to find good developers. I am having such a hard time finding a good Java developer. They just don't seem to be unemployed at all. Any advice on where to look?

By "good" do you "unattainably perfect given the meager wage I'm offering"?

I'm not saying that's the case, but part of this economic death we're experiencing involves employers expecting demigods to work for practically nothing.


Oh, not at all. We can pay quite well. I just can't find anyone very good. Everyone seems to know PHP, not so many available people doing enterprise Java.
 
2011-01-27 12:44:06 PM
StrangeQ: As someone who is starting his masters in computer engineering this summer...I'm actually getting a kick out of this.

/utter terror replaced with cautious optimism?


If you end up with an IT job with that degree, you have failed.
 
2011-01-27 12:44:25 PM
I would also like to throw a CSB out there.

When I moved to a new state I had to go whore myself out in the IT contracting scene again. For those of you not in the industry, as a network engineer it's not always very easy to find a solid steady job (especially a direct hire). Once your skillset gets to a certain level, a company would prefer to only bring you in for the design and implementation phases of a project, then roll it over to some idiot that they pay half your salary for "operation and support". So anyway, contracting it was for a while.

One 8 week contract I took was for the State's Department of Revenue. I have never worked in public sector before so I had no idea what I was in for. Never have I seen a culture of such undeserved self-congratulatory circle jerking. First off, not one single person that was actually an employee of DOR had any farking clue how to do the job that their job titled implied was their responsibility. NONE OF THEM. Their 'network person' was a moderately attractive MILFy type that after 5 years in the job did not know how to set ANY of the passwords on a Cisco router. Not only that, she got mad when I tried to explain to her HOW to do it instead of just doing it for her. They essentially survived by getting budget approval for boondoggle projects so they could bring in contractors for a few weeks at a time just so they could have people on site that understood technology for a few weeks. It was very very sad.

The worst part is that they constantly had catered meetings to congratulate each other on what a wonderful job they did... and by job I mean hiring contractors for a few weeks. Then to add insult to injury, they did some MORE of their annual asbestos removal in the building.

fark government work. Apparently everything centers around that pension.... positions are filled not based on qualification but rather who the other people want to look at for 30 years while they are waiting to punch out. They are terrible with their budget since they don't have to raise their own revenue or compete with anybody, and if you are luckly enough to be hired, you have 30 years of coworker incompetence to look forward to.

/Not naming the state but it isn't MI
 
2011-01-27 12:44:33 PM
dr.zaeus: I know of a lot of fellow ArcGIS Analyst/Developers that are about to retire. These old bastards have been around since the Avenue/AML days and have left a mountain of code update work for the next generation to sort out.

Municipal and State government mapping departments, however, aren't the best GIS positions out there; get a job with an Electric Membership Cooperative like I did and you'll strike paydirt.


At CA Dept of Fish and Game GIS is very important but the pay is not so great. The benefits are ok, not as good as people believe they are.
 
2011-01-27 12:44:55 PM
LittleSmitty: (2a) (corollary). No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9 months.

I've heard this phrased as "you can't get nine women to make a baby in one month".
 
2011-01-27 12:44:56 PM
BigMevy: And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."

As a programmer, I always respond: "I only write the software. I don't actually know how to use it."
 
2011-01-27 12:45:41 PM
John Paul Jones: HotSalsaZoot: Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.

You're talking about DBAs. That's one tiny aspect of IT. Trust me, people that actually know system and network architecture are making more than ever.


You're both talking pure technical as well. I just hired a new technical consultant who does 0 hands on. He simply follows me around and fields technical questions on our products. His salary is $175k a year.

At the sales end we're talking even higher .. easily into the $300k a year range.

Once you've been hands on for awhile look to go into consulting if you want the money then slide into sales if you want even more money and can handle the pressure.
 
2011-01-27 12:46:04 PM
ventmonkey: Oh, not at all. We can pay quite well. I just can't find anyone very good. Everyone seems to know PHP, not so many available people doing enterprise Java.

Where are you looking for people?
 
2011-01-27 12:46:06 PM
altinos: BigMevy: And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."

As a programmer, I always respond: "I only write the software. I don't actually know how to use it."


I've always gone with "I only know how to use Unix...not windows"
 
2011-01-27 12:46:18 PM
Government IT worker here.

6 years into my career with 3 here. On the 'Special Implementations' (installing all the new big expensive systems) team after putting my dues in helpdesk and deskside.

Currently 80K/year + fair amount of OT, 5 weeks vacation per year to start, 4 weeks sick leave, full pension, casual work-environment. Lots of training.

It's a decent gig.

Could I be making more in the private sector? Who knows. My first three jobs out of college were in the private sector (QA, Helpdesk, Helpdesk/Junior Sys Admin) paid 26K, 30K, and 35K respectively. I do know that I was treated like just a cog in the first two jobs, and like dirt in the third.

But I like it here, and I don't see myself anywhere else in the forseeable future.
 
2011-01-27 12:47:43 PM
altinos: ventmonkey: Oh, not at all. We can pay quite well. I just can't find anyone very good. Everyone seems to know PHP, not so many available people doing enterprise Java.

Where are you looking for people?


Phoenix, AZ.

I'm now starting to do a lot of IT/Entrepreneur meet-ups. I figure networking will hopefully help me find the right people.
 
2011-01-27 12:47:47 PM
Jobber8742: raise would be nice, but you jerks put an end to that.

Yeah... people who can't get anything are going to vote for the Republicans to shut off your gravy train until they get a better deal. The philosophy is "if I'm going to wither into financial nothingness, so should you."

Practically speaking, they should vote Democratic, but they know that's a dead-end. Democrats will either fluff out (Carter, maybe Obama) or turn Republican-lite (Clinton, maybe Obama).

That's why we need a militant socialist party in this country... not necessarily to seize power, but to scare the elite into providing the people decently.
 
2011-01-27 12:48:51 PM
I used to work on the help desk for large law firms, and then one of the big 4 accounting firms. I moved to the IT audit side and am now the game keeper instead of the game.

It is a much better existence, never on call, and CIOs have to listen to my recommendations and implement them.

If you can get into the Compliance side you are much better off. I worked for Deloitte for the first 2 years and wanted to quit my job every day, but the knowledge I gained there has been priceless.

I get calls from recruiters often trying to steal me away, and my resume isn't even on any job boards.

I do miss the troubleshooting from the help desk though, that was fun.
 
2011-01-27 12:48:55 PM
ventmonkey: Phoenix, AZ.

I'm now starting to do a lot of IT/Entrepreneur meet-ups. I figure networking will hopefully help me find the right people.


For the longest time in the Detroit area, the only people who applied for PHP jobs were teens and early 20s programmers who hacked it on their own. Has it really come that far in the enterprise?
 
2011-01-27 12:49:06 PM
I can tap on a keyboard...pay me 200k a year...and a pension...

/waaaaaaa!
 
2011-01-27 12:49:17 PM
BUT DID YOU REBOOT 3 TIMES?? (new window)

/seems relevant
 
2011-01-27 12:49:22 PM
ventmonkey: RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.

I believe this is part of the problem. If IT does their job well, and the servers/services keep working correctly, all the end users see the IT staff doing is help desk. I've had people demand that I not wear headphones and listen to music because they might have a problem, and just want to be able to yell at me. They have no idea that we spend most of our time keeping things running smoothly...er...in theory.


In IT, the amount of praise you receive is inversely proportional to the difficulty and amount of work a task or project requires.
 
2011-01-27 12:50:31 PM
TheRedMonkey: The benefits are ok, not as good as people believe they are.

RC Cola sounds delicious when all you have to drink is mud water.
 
2011-01-27 12:51:03 PM
Headline ≠ what the article says.
 
2011-01-27 12:51:08 PM
EditorialSpace: I can tap on a keyboard...pay me 200k a year...and a pension...

What do you do, shiatbird? I can bet it's nothing too damn important.
 
2011-01-27 12:51:29 PM
ventmonkey: The_Gallant_Gallstone: ventmonkey: And as a side gripe....as bad as the economy is, I would think it would be easier to find good developers. I am having such a hard time finding a good Java developer. They just don't seem to be unemployed at all. Any advice on where to look?

By "good" do you "unattainably perfect given the meager wage I'm offering"?

I'm not saying that's the case, but part of this economic death we're experiencing involves employers expecting demigods to work for practically nothing.

Oh, not at all. We can pay quite well. I just can't find anyone very good. Everyone seems to know PHP, not so many available people doing enterprise Java.


Describe "pay quite well". Realize a good Java dev is making at least a $100k in MN... I'd expect it to be higher on better talent or the coasts, were people think they are naturally worth more.
 
2011-01-27 12:52:07 PM
Debunking the Myth of a Desperate Software Labor Shortage

http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~matloff/glut.html
 
2011-01-27 12:52:15 PM
altinos: ventmonkey: Phoenix, AZ.

I'm now starting to do a lot of IT/Entrepreneur meet-ups. I figure networking will hopefully help me find the right people.

For the longest time in the Detroit area, the only people who applied for PHP jobs were teens and early 20s programmers who hacked it on their own. Has it really come that far in the enterprise?



No, it hasn't. The problem I am having is that too many people know PHP, and not enough know Enterprise Java.
 
2011-01-27 12:53:34 PM
The_Gallant_Gallstone: TheRedMonkey: The benefits are ok, not as good as people believe they are.

RC Cola sounds delicious when all you have to drink is mud water.


True, but its the non IT jobs that are really gravy. The IT jobs are underpaid or staffed by unskilled workers mostly. But then again, expectations are very low.
 
2011-01-27 12:53:39 PM
Thank God the Hyderabad School of Bicycle Repair is cranking out IT workers. Otherwise, we'd have to pay these glorified janitors what we used to pay them, and that sucked.
 
2011-01-27 12:54:24 PM
DrewFL: EditorialSpace: I can tap on a keyboard...pay me 200k a year...and a pension...

What do you do, shiatbird? I can bet it's nothing too damn important.


- - -

you can curse, too? I bet that's a 10k a year bonus.

/be careful on who you step on with yur ascent, you will surely see tham on the way down. I don't give to bums. sorry!
 
2011-01-27 12:54:53 PM
meat0918: cbackous: I guess I could tell people to turn it off and on again all day..

Or have to call IT to plug in a mouse.

//Does the grunt IT work at my office, while the main IT guys sit at HQ a few hours away, in addition to regular stuff like software dev.


::Sigh:: I had this call yesterday from a building that is 5 miles away. I told them there had to be somebody in the building that had the ability to plug a mouse in.
 
2011-01-27 12:56:19 PM
rumpelstiltskin: Thank God the Hyderabad School of Bicycle Repair is cranking out IT workers. Otherwise, we'd have to pay these glorified janitors what we used to pay them, and that sucked.

Bicycle Repairmen! But how?
 
2011-01-27 12:58:30 PM
Falcon Hunter:

As long as there are non-IT people, you will need IT people and support departments. If you think the "Help Desk" is helpless, it's because the Help Desk doesn't like you and knows you're a complete moron.

Shut up and reboot.

ID-10 T error.



THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."
 
2011-01-27 01:00:54 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


I didn't realize google was a secret. I do that right in front of them and nobody's taken the initiative to try that themselves before calling. The average user can't even comprehend an error message, let alone type it into google and figure out which response applies to their situation then use the information to fix their problem.
 
2011-01-27 01:02:24 PM
ventmonkey: I'm now starting to do a lot of IT/Entrepreneur meet-ups. I figure networking will hopefully help me find the right people.

I need to get in meet-ups too... But I haven't really found any in my county, which is odd, considering I'm only 30 miles from New York City.
 
2011-01-27 01:03:32 PM
Bag of Hammers: Falcon Hunter:

As long as there are non-IT people, you will need IT people and support departments. If you think the "Help Desk" is helpless, it's because the Help Desk doesn't like you and knows you're a complete moron.

Shut up and reboot.

ID-10 T error.


THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."



I can confirm that doctors are the worst. Followed closely by car dealerships, then small financial firms, Lawyers, and that small segment of computer based training places that teach non-technical people how to use a specific piece of software.
 
2011-01-27 01:03:58 PM
As an Oldskool IT type, I can say that the article speaks truth. In fact, a few years ago I was able to make some extra money via side contracts with the Govt, and there were a LOT of fulltime openings even then they could not fill (with the caveat that I am in a very specialized category, Oracle/Unix and SQL Server DBA work/architecture).

A few things that you need to know if you are looking for a place to land in IT.

1) Security is great, as the article says, but I would say database work is better (and a lot more common of a need). That and a CISSP is REQUIRED for security, and it is a REALLY hard test to pass I understand.

2) ERP experience (Peoplesoft, Oracle Financials, GP, etc) is golden. I know ERP folks who can still get 200$ an Hour today.

3) Coding/Programming isn't as great as people make it out to be, it depends on the situation. It's a lot better to have the idea than create it (in other words, being an architect is a 6-figure gig, but base coding that design is 50k). Being a coder is the IT analogue of an assembly line (unless of course you work for you, in which case all bets are off an you can make ... or lose... your own destiny.

4) Coding deprecates all the time, in fact from year to year people wash out because they can't keep up with the complex changes. Databases are a steeper learning curve at the start, but really don't change that often (Codd's relational theory goes back to the early 70s, and Oracle essentially hasn't changed anything but interfaces in about 10 years so that if you learn it once you can probably coast for awhile ... if that's your thing).

5) Certifications only mean something if they represent knowledge of practical use. Nobody want to pay an MCSE 100k/yr with no experience, so don't expect your community college to vault you into some great career. It's like any other business, no matter who you are you pay your dues.

6)Govt Work is VERY boring. If you have any skills at all it will probably bore you into burnout. Quickly. They are seriously change averse, expect to argue every change you intend to make to any system to death. Seriously.

Good luck to guys hoping to switch over. It's a myth (at least in IT) that it's hard to get a job as an old guy. I'm a development officer for a startup, and we actually have 4 generations of coders on our team right now. My oldest guy is almost 60, and he's sharp as a tack. IT is one job you can do until you're dead (in other words, at any age as long as you got skills).
 
2011-01-27 01:04:11 PM
Bag of Hammers:"No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas"

Here's my CSB:

I had a user call me once, screaming, that he couldn't get his email. After a few minutes into the conversation, come to find that he's in Namibia. Farkin' Namibia. His "hotel" had no internet, and even our last-resort dial-up provider didn't work in Namibia.

And somehow, this was my fault.
 
2011-01-27 01:04:40 PM
GookNukem: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.

Your IT department sucks.


Yeah - I was just going to add: you know how I know he sucks at his job?
 
2011-01-27 01:04:52 PM
I worked for the Department of Energy a few years ago as a low-level Desktop Support/Jr. Sys Admin. At that time, I was one of THREE people under the age of 30. And all three of us were contractors - not Department employees.

And that was the Department. Not just IT.

The main problem isn't that they will be able to find technical or experienced people. But the issue is that the people coming in won't have the years of training their predecessors had. They won't know processes or procedures, contacts, federal laws, etc that you pick up as someones protege.

I've seen entire laboratories and agencies "Red Flagged" and shutdown because of one or two policy issues. And this is with people that have been doing things for years. The coming issues over the next two decades are going to be AMAZING to witness.

If we want to correct this we need to spend money. We've got to hire young people into the Department NOW if we don't want to fall behind. But that would swell the ranks of Federal employees, something the American people are against (and in fact are attacking them by reducing wages).

So my options as a well-skilled, and educated Millennials are this:

1. Work for the Government:
-Stagnant or decreasing wages & benefits.
-Some people are contractors for years(which in Gov. Service means a lot).
-Crushed with red-tape/processes/procedures.
-Generally hated by politicians and the populous.

2. Work for the private sector:
-Stagnant or decreasing wages. But a possibility of advancement.
-Some people are contractors for years.
 
2011-01-27 01:05:14 PM
The problem is now that companies insist on hiring "nerd managers" who can solve all sorts of Unix, J2EE, Python, Exchange and other technical issues, but fall down horribly on completion of day-to-day activities such as employee reviews, processing time sheets, budgeting, customer/vendor relationship etc while they get caught up in solving technical issues. Morale suffers but nobody can quit because there are no jobs out there now. We just keep getting more stressed and miserable.

Yet the corporations continue to hunt for this mythical beast of "perfect guru-manager" because paying for one body instead of two keeps those "short-term-thinking" shareholders happy.

Really, short-term thinking is killing the goose that lays the golden eggs.
 
2011-01-27 01:06:45 PM
I work in desktop support (trying to get into a sysadmin position). Our helpdesk manager is a state secretary, and the desktop support manager is a logistician. The prior manager was a personnel clerk. Helpless desk? Much.
 
2011-01-27 01:08:21 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

Or just have a handful of competent people format every computer the company receives and install a standard Linux distro.
 
2011-01-27 01:08:36 PM
BigMevy: SFSailor: Threads like these, and the attitudes, ignorance and arrogance expressed in them are just another reminder of the horrible way IT people are typically treated... the last group that is socially acceptable to mock and deride to their face... even lawyers get more respect culturally. "I set up my home PC just fine - you must be an idiot!" Ugh.

And yet, just like when people meet a lawyer or a doctor the first thing they start doing is asking for free legal or medical advice, the first thing they say when they find out you're IT is "Say... I've got this problem on my pc..."


How true!

When I was on the help desk I made up a bunch of business cards and started handing them out for side jobs. I would give them my card and tell them issues are hard to diagnose without seeing them on site.

Charged $50 an hour cash and people would give me beer when I would go to their houses and set up home networks, remove viruses, etc. I was charging less until people kept telling me I wasn't charging enough. Well, I fixed that.
 
2011-01-27 01:08:57 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


LOL You've just confused IT and Helpdesk very thoroughly. Helpdesk says "reboot" "try again" "oh good it works". IT says "did you reflash the firmware after upgrading to XOCS2.3 standard?" "pull the chip and get a new one in there ASAP, the failover server is starting to run hot" etc.

It's unfortunate that these two very different classes of work are listed as "IT", because they require completely different skills.
 
2011-01-27 01:10:09 PM
xynix: It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


I am one of the burned-out IT people you speak of. Mainframe work pays really well and still does.

/Did not work help desk or Tech Support
 
2011-01-27 01:11:26 PM
JMel: "Reboot"

"Wait 15 minutes and try again"

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.


Trust me, no one listens to the recording when they call the help desk.
 
2011-01-27 01:15:49 PM
HallsOfMandos: Trust me, no one listens to the recording when they call the help desk.

They're more worried about a specific site. When the entire network goes down, these people say "I can't access thissite.com." then call back and say "Now I can't access thatsite.com" and then "I'm not getting any email!" No matter how much you say "You can't get anywhere right now!" they think they must log separate tickets for each.
 
2011-01-27 01:16:59 PM
Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.


Unless a company wants to build Hackintoshes, I doubt they would want to plunk down the insane prices to replace their entire network with Macs without a good reason. Most of the planet still uses Windows, and companies usually don't like spending time and money to retrain their staff just because they want to get away from a system that is so commonly used. On top of that, fixing bugs and taking care of computer issues is what supplies job security for IT people. If computers never needed fixing, IT people would go the way of elevator operators.

Besides, if MacOS becomes more mainstream, it's just a matter of time before some 13 year old kid writes up viruses to target them. It can be done, there's just no incentive for it right now since Windows still dominates a huge portion of the PC market.
 
2011-01-27 01:19:16 PM
JMel: "Reboot"

"Wait 15 minutes and try again"

Am I hired? Cause thats about all my IT department does. Biggest department in the company. I could save us millions to have a recording that plays those two comments on a loop when you call the helpless desk.

Trust me, no one listens to the recording when they call the help desk.


t1.gstatic.com

"Hello IT, have you turned it off and on again?"

The IT Crowd, BBC via Netflix == Priceless.
 
2011-01-27 01:19:35 PM
Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.

As a long time Mac Administrator...I disagree that they easier to manage than a Windows machine. They can actually be more problematic and lead to more abuse by the users. I have managed large deployments to small deployments...they can be a nightmare sometimes.

I have seen Windows deployments go smoothly and never have a virus outbreak unless a user is an idiot(like most are).

Sure you don't have to deal with Virus/spyware problems, but you do have to deal with Apple. I have never seen a company that hates their customers so damn much...seriously...we spent 100k in one month on new Macs and they acted like we were nothing. I get they have people spending millions a year, but a customer who spends 100k+ every year or two should get at least some respect. Trying to talk to their Systems Engineers is just a joke...trying to get support escalated properly and getting a call back can take months.

I would never really want to support a large Mac OS deployment at a corporate level again...
 
2011-01-27 01:20:46 PM
Working at a university I make less than the average person in the same field.

Having said that, the perks of 12 holidays a year, 180 sick days a year, 85% matched pension are pretty nice.

I cannot wait for all of the old guys to leave soon because they're useless. Old people = Old knowledge = old methods of doing IT work.

I'm just starting my IT career after having worked in the computer store business for 10 years, 5 of which I had my own.

Bring on the easy climb to the top!
 
2011-01-27 01:21:15 PM
Given the farked up state of IT in the Commonwealth of Virginia, some retirements might be a good thing.
 
2011-01-27 01:22:42 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: fark government work. Apparently everything centers around that pension.... positions are filled not based on qualification but rather who the other people want to look at for 30 years while they are waiting to punch out. They are terrible with their budget since they don't have to raise their own revenue or compete with anybody, and if you are luckly enough to be hired, you have 30 years of coworker incompetence to look forward to.

/Not naming the state but it isn't MI


Doesn't sound like my state, either. Our people are, for the most part, very competent at what they do. We do earn our own revenue by securing grant monies and fundraising (this is my specific group, not the entire State), and employees have an automatic check-jack of around 10-15% to go directly to fund the pension plan, one of the few that's apparently still in the black because of it. Most of us know we could make more in the private sector, but we enjoy what we do, we're good at it, and we know the work matters, and can see the benefits of it on a regular basis. It's not Happyworldland by any stretch, but it's not a horrible place to be, either.

/And I need to get back to it now that break's over
//Then off to the gym in 26 minutes...
 
2011-01-27 01:23:10 PM
Cooper420: 180 sick days a year,

Yeah... that's pretty awesome!
 
2011-01-27 01:24:20 PM
I Mash Grains: I used to work on the help desk for large law firms, and then one of the big 4 accounting firms. I moved to the IT audit side and am now the game keeper instead of the game.

It is a much better existence, never on call, and CIOs have to listen to my recommendations and implement them.

If you can get into the Compliance side you are much better off. I worked for Deloitte for the first 2 years and wanted to quit my job every day, but the knowledge I gained there has been priceless.

I get calls from recruiters often trying to steal me away, and my resume isn't even on any job boards.

I do miss the troubleshooting from the help desk though, that was fun.


Any chance you are looking to hire in any IT Audit functions? Currently working as an "IT Analyst" but am the only IT person in this division location (of a fortune 200 company) running the servers/network/security system/phones/test stands/et all and would greatly appreciate an opportunity to further my career beyond what I see capable with this company.


/even suggestions of where to look or what my next move should be are greatly appreciated
//EIP
 
2011-01-27 01:29:19 PM
Yeah, tdyak: xynix: It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.

I am one of the burned-out IT people you speak of. Mainframe work pays really well and still does.

/Did not work help desk or Tech Support


Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

You can try to outsource it to Narendar in Mumbai, but believe me, the first time they screw up the the monthly claim reconciliation run, and try to cover it up, (I've seen this happen), that stuff will come back in house quick.

//DD DUMMY
 
wee [TotalFark]
2011-01-27 01:29:32 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).

Hell half the people that do IT just do it so they can transition themselves to get towards the business end of things, the other half are simply consultants.


LegacyDL, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent post were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for also having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
 
2011-01-27 01:30:05 PM
The_Pirate: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


Yup, all those legacy apps that have been coded for Windows are going to automagically work on those shiny new Macs. fark IT, we got Macs.
 
2011-01-27 01:32:55 PM
Bag of Hammers: Falcon Hunter:

As long as there are non-IT people, you will need IT people and support departments. If you think the "Help Desk" is helpless, it's because the Help Desk doesn't like you and knows you're a complete moron.

Shut up and reboot.

ID-10 T error.


THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."


Dude, doctors are the worst.

CSB
When I first started civilian helpdesk right out of the Marine Corps, I was working for a healthcare company. Got a call from a doc that was having issues. I called him by his first name. He corrected me saying he was a doctor. I proceeded to tell him he could call me Sergeant if that were the case. We were on a first name basis after that because he was to vein to call me by my title.

/not helpdesk anymore
//server admin at Fortune 100 company
 
2011-01-27 01:33:32 PM
I mean my comment (and I stand by it) for work within my specific industry - advertising/graphic design/2D&3D animation/compositing/etc. Mac is the standard cause they work. I don't want/need to know how to rebuild the transmission on my car, but still need it to do it's job - why is the PC camp so rabid about this?

Couple all of this with the fact that I've been waiting for over a month, enduring all the processes, copying all the bosses, etc. and I am STILL losing files/work due to crashes, bugs and such. I had to file an IT ticket in the Phoenix office, so they could send it to India, who finally called last week, they couldn't remote login to my PC, and were to escallate the ticket to our service center (one floor below me.) They either lost the ticket or someone downstairs did - cause I've been told I need to refile. All the while loosing valuable production time - a cost that would be easily offset by any increased initial cost of a good powerful mac system.
 
2011-01-27 01:34:52 PM
The_Pirate: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...

Yup, all those legacy apps that have been coded for Windows are going to automagically work on those shiny new Macs. fark IT, we got Macs.


THIS!

The irony of what this guy is saying is that converting from Windows (business) to Mac (Interior Design?) would make said IT shop 10X larger in any real-sized shop. The conversion would be... Epic.
 
2011-01-27 01:39:14 PM
Thunderpipes: Jobber8742: godofusa.com: The average private sector worker gets about $60k/y if you count salary + benefits. The average government worker gets almost double that because of the ridiculous taxpayer-funded benefits and pensions.

We're broke.

yeah, none of that is accurate.

/Government worker
//Does not make double $60k
///Does not have a pension, we get 401k matching like everyone else
////We pay about what everyone else pays for benefits
////slashies

Maybe you personally, but on average, a US government worker gets 40k in benefits, a private employee 10k. Why do you think government at a federal and state level has over 1 trillion dollars in underfunded pension obligations alone?


Assuming these numbers are correct, you can't just average each set. I would imagine that the government has a larger percentage of skilled and/or educated employees than private businesses as a whole. How many fry cooks does McDonalds employ? How many cashiers at Safeway? What are their benefits like? What are they responsible for and held accountable for? How many jobs in the federal government compare to these positions with private companies?
 
2011-01-27 01:42:02 PM
Ludendorff's Ghost:
Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.


You don't need mainframes for that... Our ERP system is written in COBOL. Yay for that. I think they still got one guy who's writing it, possibly in his mom's basement. I've been pushing for replacement ERP for a long, looooong time, but it's an uphill battle. I wish it would just implode so I could say "I told you so".
 
2011-01-27 01:43:28 PM
bump: I mean my comment (and I stand by it) for work within my specific industry - advertising/graphic design/2D&3D animation/compositing/etc. Mac is the standard cause they work. I don't want/need to know how to rebuild the transmission on my car, but still need it to do it's job - why is the PC camp so rabid about this?

Couple all of this with the fact that I've been waiting for over a month, enduring all the processes, copying all the bosses, etc. and I am STILL losing files/work due to crashes, bugs and such. I had to file an IT ticket in the Phoenix office, so they could send it to India, who finally called last week, they couldn't remote login to my PC, and were to escallate the ticket to our service center (one floor below me.) They either lost the ticket or someone downstairs did - cause I've been told I need to refile. All the while loosing valuable production time - a cost that would be easily offset by any increased initial cost of a good powerful mac system.


It sounds more like the executives at the company are incompetent than the IT guys. What dumbass designed that organizational structure and process?
 
2011-01-27 01:43:38 PM
About to take a $62 an hour job. I currently make $35.90. Remote SAN backup and OS support for a major state contract, through my current employer, so a promotion of sorts. Should be 20-30 hours of OT a week at time and a half as well. I will work from my home office. Get my benefits through my wife's plan. Things are looking very much up for me. It is also going to be extremely challenging, which I look forward to. First on the list will be to start getting certifications I never had time/money for, Cisco, EMC, etc. But I put my time and my hours in for the last 11 years starting out as a pegboy and working my way up. Also finally finishing my bachelor degree this Spring. Try going to school and working 50+ hours a week and getting married and makin babies. It takes a toll on you after a while, but the payoffs are there.

The people I work with now are incredibly talented and professional. The new people will be even more so. People really do need to stop thinking that all of IT is the dork that guides idiots through broken mice. You also don't have to be in management to make big bucks. I should clear 200k a year easy, and will be doing technical work. I will drink many, many beers.
 
2011-01-27 01:45:11 PM
bump: I mean my comment (and I stand by it) for work within my specific industry - advertising/graphic design/2D&3D animation/compositing/etc. Mac is the standard cause they work. I don't want/need to know how to rebuild the transmission on my car, but still need it to do it's job - why is the PC camp so rabid about this?

Couple all of this with the fact that I've been waiting for over a month, enduring all the processes, copying all the bosses, etc. and I am STILL losing files/work due to crashes, bugs and such. I had to file an IT ticket in the Phoenix office, so they could send it to India, who finally called last week, they couldn't remote login to my PC, and were to escallate the ticket to our service center (one floor below me.) They either lost the ticket or someone downstairs did - cause I've been told I need to refile. All the while loosing valuable production time - a cost that would be easily offset by any increased initial cost of a good powerful mac system.


As has been said, your IT department sucks. You don't need to know how to rebuild your transmission - but I should hope your mechanic does.

I know this is going to sound mean, but if you're in advertising its probably a PEBCAC situation.

Yeah, that was mean.
 
2011-01-27 01:47:09 PM
HotSalsaZoot: Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.



This IT field employed college dropout snickers. But the fewer people in my field the better it is for me, so... "Yes, please believe everything this person just said. It is all true."

/trying to keep a straight face.
 
2011-01-27 01:47:19 PM
ventmonkey: [looking for Java people in] Phoenix, AZ.

I know one Java guy who's pretty good, but he already has a full-time job. Maybe he knows some people. Tried the PLUG list? Lots of technical people hang out there. EIP if you'd like more detail.

Me? PHP, MySQL, Apache, Perl, Ruby, C/++, anything relating to Linux including DRBD/HA/LVS, writing docs, troubleshooting, support, JOAT. But not Java. And right now I'm too busy for conslutting work.
 
2011-01-27 01:47:55 PM
finnished: Ludendorff's Ghost:
Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

You don't need mainframes for that... Our ERP system is written in COBOL. Yay for that. I think they still got one guy who's writing it, possibly in his mom's basement. I've been pushing for replacement ERP for a long, looooong time, but it's an uphill battle. I wish it would just implode so I could say "I told you so".



And sadly, for every day that you can manage to keep the system limping along without imploding, some bean counter somewhere gets to crow about how much money he's saving the company by avoiding replacement/revamping.
 
2011-01-27 01:49:33 PM
I Mash Grains: When I was on the help desk I made up a bunch of business cards and started handing them out for side jobs. I would give them my card and tell them issues are hard to diagnose without seeing them on site.

Charged $50 an hour cash and people would give me beer when I would go to their houses and set up home networks, remove viruses, etc. I was charging less until people kept telling me I wasn't charging enough. Well, I fixed that.


I've become so tired of doing side jobs that I charge $75 an hour (hour minimum) to help people with side projects. People are still willing to pay it. I would guess I get a 2-3 phone calls a week on average asking for personal computer help.
 
2011-01-27 01:54:04 PM
ScottRiqui: And sadly, for every day that you can manage to keep the system limping along without imploding, some bean counter somewhere gets to crow about how much money he's saving the company by avoiding replacement/revamping.

And I know exactly who that person is too! Yes, it's a lot of money to replace it, yes it's a lot of resources that are needed, but the alternatives are much worse. And changing an ERP system will never get any easier. It makes me so angry I want to quit, but I guess I'm still looking for my balls. I think my boss might have them.
 
2011-01-27 01:55:27 PM
Heard the same thing in 1995.
 
2011-01-27 01:55:39 PM
Thunderpipes: People really do need to stop thinking that all of IT is the dork that guides idiots through broken mice. You also don't have to be in management to make big bucks. I should clear 200k a year easy, and will be doing technical work. I will drink many, many beers.

And I will shout "Cool Story Bro" until my throat is sore!
 
2011-01-27 01:57:58 PM
Skeet Skeet: Any chance you are looking to hire in any IT Audit functions? Currently working as an "IT Analyst" but am the only IT person in this division location (of a fortune 200 company) running the servers/network/security system/phones/test stands/et all and would greatly appreciate an opportunity to further my career beyond what I see capable with this company.



I didn't see EIP.
I don't hire, but I would look into the Price Waterhouse Cooper, Deloittes, KPMG, or Ernst and Young for a good start. You might work a lot of hours the first 2 years with them, but with a big 4 on your resume you have a lot to choose from. Look into getting a CISA or CISM certification.

Or you can look into IT Compliance with the company you are with now. Come to think of it, you might even look into the Security and Privacy services with one of those firms, and in that case you would want to get a CISSP.

Might be a pay cut to start for you with the skills you have, but you would never be on call, etc.

My pay went up probably 45% in the 4 years I have been doing IT audit. I probably work about 38 hours a week, haven't gone over 45 hours since I left the big 4.
 
2011-01-27 02:02:01 PM
Bag of Hammers: Falcon Hunter:

As long as there are non-IT people, you will need IT people and support departments. If you think the "Help Desk" is helpless, it's because the Help Desk doesn't like you and knows you're a complete moron.

Shut up and reboot.

ID-10 T error.


THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."

Dude, doctors are the worst.

CSB
When I first started civilian helpdesk right out of the Marine Corps, I was working for a healthcare company. Got a call from a doc that was having issues. I called him by his first name. He corrected me saying he was a doctor. I proceeded to tell him he could call me Sergeant if that were the case. We were on a first name basis after that because he was to vein to call me by my title.

/not helpdesk anymore
//server admin at Fortune 100 company


Doctors are just a pain in the ass to deal with all the way around. We make PACS (radiology.. like the systems attached to a CT machine... sort of) workstations and EMR control software, and I can say with certainty that the techno-illiterate doc is a non-endangered species. Part of the problem is that they have gone out of their way as an industry to create a scarcity of doctors, and that has made for an aging (read 50+) physician demographic which grew up and was trained without any kind of technology. The last numbers I heard were that 6% of docs used an electronic EMR, and around 30% of docs were using electronic images (most still print film, silver and the whole bit).

Arrogance? OMG. I used to work with a doc who REFUSED to fly commerical, to the point of owning and maintaining his own air force. A few year ago he presented at RSNA (the big radiology conference) and flew the damn things back and forth so he could sleep at home. This cost him 1200$/hr in fuel + 2 crew. He felt that this was an entitlement he deserved, and he made a ton of sacrifices for everyone else around him in order to do it (read: 'hey guys, sorry no raises this year, fuel went up').

Doctors are both bad to work for, and are nearly impossible to get money from as a vendor. There is a deep seated feeling (by them) that everyone else can just chill and wait for them to be ready... except if the printer breaks (in which case its a farking crisis because THEY need it now... nevermind that it hasn't worked for two weeks while everyone else needed it, etc).
 
2011-01-27 02:02:14 PM
Does this mean I have to learn COBOL?

I have the least respect for COBOL programmers due to some experiences I had about 15-20 years ago. They were lazy farking idiots, but they had data I needed to manipulate (using such cutting edge technology as C and SQL).

Could you maybe split the data up into easily parsed fields or some shiat like that?

No, that's too complicated for us COBOL programmers. We can send you what we send to the printer as a text-file though.

I never wrote so much convoluted code in my farking life.

I had to figure out First, Middle (possibly initial) and last names from a text file. How did I determine what the middle name of "Anita De La Rosa" was or even if there was a middle name? Well how would you do it?

I hard-coded a lot of shiat. "De La Rosa" was just my favorite last name. There were plenty of others. "Van Douchebag" I think was another of them. And how did I figure out that the 'D' in MacDonald of McDonald should be capitalized? Well, the COBOL programmers didn't understand lower-case. Everything was upper-case to them. Again I had to hard-code that shiat.

It was messy and very very ugly. I'm ashamed of that code, but what else could I do?

The only thing I can say in my defense is that my code is still running their retail operation over 15 years after I quit that job.

Every once in a while I visit one of their stores and casually take a look at their POS terminals. And I say "Yup, still my software. I wonder if they ever changed the root password".

The last time I did that the salesgirl told me how much she thought it sucked. I hadn't told her that I wrote 90% of it or that it was 15 years old but I could see her point. 15 years ago it looked ancient.

At least they aren't putting Wyse terminals in their stores anymore. I think they're still using Epson printers though.
 
2011-01-27 02:02:20 PM
IT jobs are needed now because the older generation of workers have no clue how to do basic things with a computer, such as hyperlinking. Seriously, my boss calls that magic... Once these useless older workers retire or die, the business world will be a lot different and IT will be almost unneccessary.
 
2011-01-27 02:05:57 PM
Nick Spiceyweiner: IT jobs are needed now because the older generation of workers have no clue how to do basic things with a computer, such as hyperlinking. Seriously, my boss calls that magic... Once these useless older workers retire or die, the business world will be a lot different and IT will be almost unneccessary.

Uh huh. Not like there are actually computers and networks out there that have nothing to do with end user workstations. Knowing how to hyperlink means you can build and run a huge storage network, yup.
 
2011-01-27 02:06:35 PM
Happy Hours:
I have the least respect for COBOL programmers due to some experiences I had about 15-20 years ago.


Funny... This actually explains a lot of idiosyncrasies in our ERP software.
 
2011-01-27 02:09:48 PM
Dear employer:
Please withhold a significant amount of my pay for a period of up to 40 years. Please continue to withhold that money even after I leave your employ. Please keep that money if I leave your employ before I have fully vested. Please do not seek any significant investment opportunities with that money. Please do nothing to reduce my tax liability for the money you are withholding. Please do not let me withdraw that money as a lump sum, even once I'm eligible to make withdrawals.
 
2011-01-27 02:11:16 PM
HotSalsaZoot: xynix:
It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.


This. Changed my major to business.
 
2011-01-27 02:16:59 PM
RussianPooper:
In IT, the amount of praise you receive is inversely proportional to the difficulty and amount of work a task or project requires.


I worked out some oddities in our DFS implementation that fixed some snafu with our nearline backups. *crickets*

BUT, I make a farking email alias for a bunch of interns, and I get a standing ovation at the staff meeting.

facepalm.jpg
 
2011-01-27 02:18:45 PM
I'm a software engineer. I've worked for one of the biggest global corporations, and for a handful of small companies.

The bigger the company, the stupider the work force.

At the big company, the sys admin was the dumbest fark I'd ever encountered in the IT trade. His authentication server took a shiat and he asked me what was wrong with my program. Folks couldn't connect to it anymore.

*SIGH*

Hey man. Need a DB app? A cute GUI? A nice web service hosted in a windows service? No? Then why in the fark are you asking me? Do YOUR job, I'll do mine.

He ended up on the phone with Microsoft for 3 working days (major bank) to find out how he had misconfigured Kerberos with a patch.

Big companies can afford to have stupid employees.

Give me a small company any day where you and your colleagues have to know their shiat to keep the company going.
 
2011-01-27 02:20:01 PM
SlothB77: FTFA subby: Government continues to have trouble competing with higher salaries in the private sector and restrictions in the civil service system, Grant said. "More than 78 percent of state CIOs confirmed that state salary rates and pay grade structures present a challenge in attracting and retaining skilled IT talent," the report said.


Goddamnit! And we were all set up for a good anti-Government circle-jerk masterbatorithon!

Subby should probably find some way to work in "Palin" and "Obongo" into this, too, just for effect.

/apparently works for the wrong Government
 
2011-01-27 02:23:10 PM
AcneVulgaris: The price is merely your soul and will to live. 30 years as a drone to earn a comfortable retirement for your hollowed out shell.

Only to find that the government no longer can borrow the money to pay for your retirement.


Do states still even have pensions for new workers? Last time I worked federal it was a Thrift Savings Plan, like a 401K, or nothing.
 
2011-01-27 02:23:19 PM
LegacyDL: IT is only in demand because people are too lazy to fix their own computers/printers/servers/coding.

Once people figure out the secret to IT *cough*searching google*cough* it will lose its appeal and will soon join the other professions that used to be hot and then got cooled off(nursing, law, education, etc).


Once they "figure it out"? It's not a secret. shiat, I go out of my way to try to train people to do that, and they still don't.
 
2011-01-27 02:23:28 PM
Thunderpipes: Nick Spiceyweiner: IT jobs are needed now because the older generation of workers have no clue how to do basic things with a computer, such as hyperlinking. Seriously, my boss calls that magic... Once these useless older workers retire or die, the business world will be a lot different and IT will be almost unneccessary.

Uh huh. Not like there are actually computers and networks out there that have nothing to do with end user workstations. Knowing how to hyperlink means you can build and run a huge storage network, yup.


Not what I was saying, but thanks for the sarcastic comment. I am saying that even simple things like hyperlinking are freaking beyond the grasp of most older workers, so there is no chance they can handle anything IT related. I am in training and education for a Bankers Association, and I also know more about IT than our IT people.
 
2011-01-27 02:25:48 PM
Happy Hours
Does this mean I have to learn COBOL?


Today, Cobol == SQL.
 
2011-01-27 02:27:04 PM
Bag of Hammers: "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."

Is VPN against HIPAA? Just wondering.

I used to support lawyers so can feel your pain. I can't tell you how many times I heard "The longer you have my laptop, the less billable hours I will be able to charge".
 
2011-01-27 02:29:34 PM
hufnmouth: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs Linux all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

//FTFY
//Oh Shiat, they're the same thing now.


One can dream. Hell we do 90% of our development utilizing IBM Websphere environment on Windows boxes only to deploy to Solaris or Linux servers. Can't get management to understand we should go to Linux on the desktop with some sort of GUI for most users. Personally I would love to be all command line, VI, Linux based.
 
2011-01-27 02:29:39 PM
Nick Spiceyweiner: HotSalsaZoot: xynix:
It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


Uhhh, no. Really, no. Ten years ago, someone with a BS in CS, 2-3 years of real Oracle experience, maybe a year in Oracle Apps experience would get you $120-150. Today, it's an MBA, 5-8 years Oracle experience plus must have worked in every programming environment known to man for $65-80K/year AND they'll work you to death and typically offer little in return.

Glory days of IT are over.

This. Changed my major to business.




That's pretty cool. I only have one request... when you get your first big gig out of college, don't bother me about signing up for one of your in-store credit cards when I'm checking out.

Thanks.
 
2011-01-27 02:30:54 PM
Ludendorff's Ghost: Yeah, tdyak: xynix: It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.

I am one of the burned-out IT people you speak of. Mainframe work pays really well and still does.

/Did not work help desk or Tech Support

Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

You can try to outsource it to Narendar in Mumbai, but believe me, the first time they screw up the the monthly claim reconciliation run, and try to cover it up, (I've seen this happen), that stuff will come back in house quick.

//DD DUMMY


Outsourcing MF is next to impossible. Most outsourcing countries (India, Brazil, etc) don't even have mainframe systems.

They're simply to expensive and they have no experience.

Nice JCL reference by the way.

/34 year old Mainframe Systems Programmer.
 
2011-01-27 02:32:26 PM
BigMevy: FTFAFor several years state governments have warned that the graying of the baby boom generation would result in a "retirement wave" of public-sector employees whose institutional knowledge wouldn't be easily replaced.


That's a bad thing? I imagine a lot of those old geezers are part of the problem. Get some young blood in there and see how they can streamline things for more efficiency.

As to all the IT bashers in this thread: Call Centers and Help Desk does not encompass all of IT thankyouverymuch.


IT experts hate their own help desks and call centers almost as much as the users, because the help desk can fark things up worse then the standard user and gives us all a bad reputation.
 
2011-01-27 02:33:56 PM
ScottRiqui: finnished: Ludendorff's Ghost:
Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

You don't need mainframes for that... Our ERP system is written in COBOL. Yay for that. I think they still got one guy who's writing it, possibly in his mom's basement. I've been pushing for replacement ERP for a long, looooong time, but it's an uphill battle. I wish it would just implode so I could say "I told you so".


And sadly, for every day that you can manage to keep the system limping along without imploding, some bean counter somewhere gets to crow about how much money he's saving the company by avoiding replacement/revamping.


You know they still make "new" mainframes...right? And OS's, and software, etc.?
 
2011-01-27 02:35:43 PM
most .gov IT jobs require secret clearance

secret clearance requires good credit

good credit requires one to be lucky enough to no get laid off

/got laid off once
//wife got laid off twice
///do not have good credit
 
2011-01-27 02:36:09 PM
Many older IT workers postponed their retirement when the economy turned south, but they will still eventually leave... in a pine box.
 
2011-01-27 02:36:15 PM
Such hate for helpdesk in this thread (mostly deserved, I admit).

I've been in IT for about 17 years, currently as a senior sysadmin but I've worked my way through helpdesk, programming, a stint in management, and it's not all "reboot" answers. When you get to a certain level of IT knowledge, you stop having to answer such foolishness and can get to more of an architect position. The only people who should be fielding helpdesk calls (and saying "please reboot" are those who have no IT knowledge and are operating from a binder (either from lack of experience or inability to retain knowledge).
 
2011-01-27 02:37:01 PM
The glory days are over, late 90s were really it. You could get a 100k job with minimal experience and a 50-70k job by fogging up a mirror and passing your MSCE. Those days are gone and they are not going to come back. Those that rode the wave a number took pay cuts, even more got out of the field all together after downsizing.

/15 years experience in the field
//now doing IT for health care
///feels damn lucky to the gig
////fark consulting, fark it hard, I worked 60-80 hour weeks making some other farker rich
 
2011-01-27 02:41:15 PM
deconstructed: most .gov IT jobs require secret clearance

secret clearance requires good credit

good credit requires one to be lucky enough to no get laid off

/got laid off once
//wife got laid off twice
///do not have good credit


Yup, worked at a AFB datacenter for one month while they were doing my background check. I had a 7 year old bankrupcy (due to layoff) and it kept me from getting the job.

That's ok, my previous employer (who had just laid me off as well)
took me back as a contractor making rediculous amounts of money.

But then they brought me back on as an employee and my pay went back to garbage.
 
2011-01-27 02:41:25 PM
Slaves2Darkness: hufnmouth: bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs Linux all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

//FTFY
//Oh Shiat, they're the same thing now.

One can dream. Hell we do 90% of our development utilizing IBM Websphere environment on Windows boxes only to deploy to Solaris or Linux servers. Can't get management to understand we should go to Linux on the desktop with some sort of GUI for most users. Personally I would love to be all command line, VI, Linux based.


We've tried Ubuntu with KDE to make it pretty. People thought we were going to Macs.
 
2011-01-27 02:42:04 PM
Odd The Viking Quote 2011-01-27 12:41:41 PM

Your IT department doesn't know how to secure their network. PCs on our managed network very seldom get viruses, and if they do, the IT dept knows about it before the user does. In 8 years, I have seen ONE virus effect one of our servers, and that's because it was new and Symantec hadn't seen it yet. Within 4 hours of it being noticed by one of the server guys, Symantec had a patch out and added it to their automatic updates.

>>

Nobody said a virus outbreak was crippling the network or infecting multiple computers. (they do use Norton though so when it happens is anyone surprised?)

The problem is the amount of manpower it takes to go around in large work environments and reimage those computers that were infected. That's time that the hardware monkey could be doing something else, like deploying new computers, or tracking rogue computers down that did not get updated automatically for some reason. In a campus of thousands of computers it's far harder to have a perfect network setup... especially when a lot of your workers just like academia and are computer clueless except they "just like macs" like almost everyone else who graduates college for some reason.

I have worked in an all mac environment, and while the servers are a little more expensive, you have just as many options as windows, and any good program will run on a unix/linux base. Plus, who the fark wants to deal with exchange anyway? Talk about a time wasting money drain.
 
2011-01-27 02:42:21 PM
Bag of Hammers:
THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."


Seconded. I love working in the health care field, but holy fark are people that are good at care giving bad with tech, on top of that I have never seen so many damaged laptops. WTF do they do play volleyball with their gear?
 
2011-01-27 02:43:39 PM
IT for a state government? Hmmmm, I think I still remember some VMS and DECnet.
 
2011-01-27 02:44:01 PM
Devlik: The glory days are over, late 90s were really it. You could get a 100k job with minimal experience and a 50-70k job by fogging up a mirror and passing your MSCE. Those days are gone and they are not going to come back. Those that rode the wave a number took pay cuts, even more got out of the field all together after downsizing.

/15 years experience in the field
//now doing IT for health care
///feels damn lucky to the gig
////fark consulting, fark it hard, I worked 60-80 hour weeks making some other farker rich


Those weren't "glory days", those were "bubble days".

From my experience and from what I've seen, IT has been the most resilient industry through this recession. That speaks volumes about its strength. Yeah, their not minting billionaires every week in Silicon Valley, but if you're good at something technically, you won't have to spend your days being uncertain about much.

Through this recession I've seen lots of good IT guys get laid off and whatnot. The good ones found new jobs in days or weeks, while the ones that a lot people in this thread are b*tching about are part of that 99ers club.

If you work in technology, and you can't find a job, you are either horrible at what you do and everyone hates you because you suck, or you haven't relocated to somewhere that will pay for that job.
 
2011-01-27 02:47:28 PM
Ludendorff's Ghost: Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

You can try to outsource it to Narendar in Mumbai, but believe me, the first time they screw up the the monthly claim reconciliation run, and try to cover it up, (I've seen this happen), that stuff will come back in house quick.


I'm not really sure if you're trolling or not, but I'm going to give a 6/10 for it.

/Still not as good as a Nonstop.
//Nothing ever will be.
 
2011-01-27 02:49:30 PM
Devlik: Bag of Hammers:
THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."

Seconded. I love working in the health care field, but holy fark are people that are good at care giving bad with tech, on top of that I have never seen so many damaged laptops. WTF do they do play volleyball with their gear?


HAHA, our customer base is psychiatrists, they want you to feel the pain that their outage has caused
 
2011-01-27 02:50:49 PM
The Southern Dandy: IT for a state government? Hmmmm, I think I still remember some VMS and DECnet.

That reminds me of a State IT douchebag I met. This guy was so useless and I think borderline retarded. He was the embodiment of every state worker stereotype. I could tell stories about useless this guy was. It's no surprise that California is drowning in debt. They've paid this guy for 25 years, and now they're going to pay his pension. He should have been fired for incompetence 1 month into his job. If this were a just world, he would be sent to the death panels.

The funny part is, his last name was "Smart", so everyone around had their own way of saying it. Some people would refer to him in emails as Mr. Smrt. Most people called him "Notso", which became his whole name. Firstname Notso Smart.

Every time his name came up it was Firstname Notso Smart won't be attending the meeting.

The sad thing is, this horrible douchebag retired with a full pension, then they brought him back as a consultant so he could 'help'.
 
2011-01-27 02:54:36 PM
Devlik: Bag of Hammers:
THIS. Worked IT in the medical field for 2 years. If you think the average person is tech illiterate try dealing with a doctor. Combine technical illiteracy with a douchey sense of entitlement. "No Doctor, your clinical records app is not going to work, you're on a beach in the Bahamas, you have no connection to our network....Sorry, no we can't magically give you network access over the phone. Yes sir, I realize the hotel gave you free wireless but that doesn't give you access to our HIPAA-protected network. Sure, call my CIO, he'll laugh in your face. Goodbyehaveaniceday."

Seconded. I love working in the health care field, but holy fark are people that are good at care giving bad with tech, on top of that I have never seen so many damaged laptops. WTF do they do play volleyball with their gear?


I've seen how traveling in home care nurses work with laptops, mostly it is a case of not having enough hands and caring more about the human in front of you then the piece of plastic and silicon the company forces you to carry. They end up on the floor a lot.
 
2011-01-27 02:59:50 PM
Slaves2Darkness:
I've seen how traveling in home care nurses work with laptops, mostly it is a case of not having enough hands and caring more about the human in front of you then the piece of plastic and silicon the company forces you to carry. They end up on the floor a lot.


That could be we are a hospice facility with an IPU/Residence but the bulk of it is in home. They were seven levels of pissed when I told them that the laptops had to be in padded bags, that yes we needed passwords longer than 4 characters and yes you need to change them 4 times a year at a minimum.

I work with our help desk staff to try to minimize the disruption technology brings to their day to day job but it is hard. I am looking at rolling out smart phones that CNAs can chart on so they will no longer need laptops or any other devices. Personally I can't wait.

/HIPPA it has teeth
//RSA tokens might be our next step
///Just happy I run the servers instead of what our CNA due. Those folks are amazing.
 
2011-01-27 03:01:04 PM
Cubansaltyballs: The Southern Dandy: IT for a state government? Hmmmm, I think I still remember some VMS and DECnet.

That reminds me of a State IT douchebag I met. This guy was so useless and I think borderline retarded. He was the embodiment of every state worker stereotype. I could tell stories about useless this guy was. It's no surprise that California is drowning in debt. They've paid this guy for 25 years, and now they're going to pay his pension. He should have been fired for incompetence 1 month into his job. If this were a just world, he would be sent to the death panels.

The funny part is, his last name was "Smart", so everyone around had their own way of saying it. Some people would refer to him in emails as Mr. Smrt. Most people called him "Notso", which became his whole name. Firstname Notso Smart.

Every time his name came up it was Firstname Notso Smart won't be attending the meeting.

The sad thing is, this horrible douchebag retired with a full pension, then they brought him back as a consultant so he could 'help'.


Was he really stupid or had he been doing the same thing for the last 25 years and nobody forced him to re-train or do something different?

One of the problems you have in government, at all levels, is training. Government rarely sees the need to train their workers for something new or even to keep up their skills. When working in the IT or software this is deadly to your career if you are not self directing.

Sad thing is most Government IT workers won't pay for their own training and most Government departments I've worked for routinely gut their training budget, but hey an X thousand dollar a year training benefit is counted against you every year.
 
2011-01-27 03:01:06 PM
So - all you non-helpdesk IT people - any advice for a helpdesk monkey that is desperately trying to move on to bigger and better things in IT field? I have some experience (from college) with coding but it really isn't my thing. I really want to get into sysadmin or network architecture but I am very hesitant to pay one of these Certification mills thousands of $$ for the training/test when the Cert will probably be deemed worthless with no actual sysadmin/network tech experience. I have 5+ years help desk experience and the A+ (yawn) cert.
 
2011-01-27 03:07:39 PM
Burl Swift: You know they still make "new" mainframes...right? And OS's, and software, etc.?

We weren't talking about mainframes, or hardware even, but ERP systems. And sure you can throw new hardware in, but at the end of the day, it's still that same old COBOL code that keeps the ERP system ticking. And that's what worries me.
 
2011-01-27 03:10:22 PM
HallsOfMandos: So - all you non-helpdesk IT people - any advice for a helpdesk monkey that is desperately trying to move on to bigger and better things in IT field? I have some experience (from college) with coding but it really isn't my thing. I really want to get into sysadmin or network architecture but I am very hesitant to pay one of these Certification mills thousands of $$ for the training/test when the Cert will probably be deemed worthless with no actual sysadmin/network tech experience. I have 5+ years help desk experience and the A+ (yawn) cert.

Set up a network of systems in your home and keep adding functions to it. Then way when you are at the "entry level sysadmin" job interview, you actually have some experience that is applicable.

If you use VMware and linux, it can be pretty cheap.

--

Worked at a place where the help desk tickets actually had a check box for "Prefers to be called Doctor". So the poor dears wouldn't have to correct you.
 
2011-01-27 03:11:17 PM
HallsOfMandos: So - all you non-helpdesk IT people - any advice for a helpdesk monkey that is desperately trying to move on to bigger and better things in IT field? I have some experience (from college) with coding but it really isn't my thing. I really want to get into sysadmin or network architecture but I am very hesitant to pay one of these Certification mills thousands of $$ for the training/test when the Cert will probably be deemed worthless with no actual sysadmin/network tech experience. I have 5+ years help desk experience and the A+ (yawn) cert.

Hate to say it but your odds are not good. This is how I did it back in the day.

Step 1) Quit your help desk gig for a job that will pay for your certs
Step 2) Work for shiat wages and many hours for said job at some low level bullshiat admin job
Step 3) Quit said bullshiat job and join up with a reputable consulting firm that will work you to near death. This will give you the experience you need to work with multiple systems in different environments faster than any place else.
Step 4) Become very very good at what you do, pick a system and really learn it damn well, Exchange, SQL, AD, WebAdmin all good choices pick at least 2 perferbly 3.
Step 5) Get a solid rep for being good at Step 4. Your rep is every thing treat it better than your g/f, your car, value it more than your life.
Step 6) Find a company looking for a high end admin in your area of choice preferably in either distribution or health care.
Step 7) Finally enjoy your life now that your not on call 24/7 to 50+ clients and working 40-50 hour weeks instead of 60-80

/marrying the most understanding woman who puts up with all of the above is optional but recommended.
 
2011-01-27 03:11:22 PM
HallsOfMandos: I really want to get into sysadmin or network architecture but I am very hesitant to pay one of these Certification mills thousands of $$ for the training/test when the Cert will probably be deemed worthless with no actual sysadmin/network tech experience.

You could go to one of the training places that sets you up on an actual network for training and testing.
 
2011-01-27 03:18:08 PM
HallsOfMandos: So - all you non-helpdesk IT people - any advice for a helpdesk monkey that is desperately trying to move on to bigger and better things in IT field? I have some experience (from college) with coding but it really isn't my thing. I really want to get into sysadmin or network architecture but I am very hesitant to pay one of these Certification mills thousands of $$ for the training/test when the Cert will probably be deemed worthless with no actual sysadmin/network tech experience. I have 5+ years help desk experience and the A+ (yawn) cert.

Are you helpdesking for a specific application? I got my start as a helpdesk person for a software package and learned how it operated internally. Fixed most of my issues by going to the database (both ID'ing and fixing). From there went on to learn the API we offered to customers and then made my first vault up the ladder to be a corporate trainer in that API to customers. Then went on to a law firm as an application admin in that app, still increasing my database skills, and now a DBA having nothing to do with that app but could also go back into that niche market if I needed to.
 
2011-01-27 03:23:16 PM
Hair Salad: RussianPooper: I like how the only thing people think IT does is help desk.
This.


to the average layman IT is help desk or desktop support.
 
2011-01-27 03:28:12 PM
Big Al: Odd The Viking Quote 2011-01-27 12:41:41 PM

Your IT department doesn't know how to secure their network. PCs on our managed network very seldom get viruses, and if they do, the IT dept knows about it before the user does. In 8 years, I have seen ONE virus effect one of our servers, and that's because it was new and Symantec hadn't seen it yet. Within 4 hours of it being noticed by one of the server guys, Symantec had a patch out and added it to their automatic updates.

>>

Nobody said a virus outbreak was crippling the network or infecting multiple computers. (they do use Norton though so when it happens is anyone surprised?)

The problem is the amount of manpower it takes to go around in large work environments and reimage those computers that were infected. That's time that the hardware monkey could be doing something else, like deploying new computers, or tracking rogue computers down that did not get updated automatically for some reason. In a campus of thousands of computers it's far harder to have a perfect network setup... especially when a lot of your workers just like academia and are computer clueless except they "just like macs" like almost everyone else who graduates college for some reason.

I have worked in an all mac environment, and while the servers are a little more expensive, you have just as many options as windows, and any good program will run on a unix/linux base. Plus, who the fark wants to deal with exchange anyway? Talk about a time wasting money drain.



You know how I know that you have no farking clue what you're talking about?

/Really there is no such thing as an "Apple Server" anymore
//Even when there was, it had nowhere near the options a proper server does
 
2011-01-27 03:40:47 PM
Thanks for all the input everyone!

Currently working help desk for a local hospital network - just general windows stuff, some app-specific things but nothing really deep (most of that stuff they just want us to collect specific pieces of data before we send the issue elsewhere). I have some experience working in AD creating accounts and adding security groups. I went in to a local cert mill that offers hands-on training for a variety of certs (mcse, ccna, etc) but I am really weary of adding several thousand in student loans to be able to pay for it - I get mixed reviews from people as far as what they think of the training these places give.
 
2011-01-27 03:41:05 PM
I'm a Drupal guy. Desperately looking to hire more Drupal guys, especially in the Washington, DC area. I don't know about other arenas in the IT field, but this particular one, they can't train people fast enough. Especially with Drupal 7 out.

/EIP if you're a drupal guy or wanna be one.
 
2011-01-27 03:48:02 PM
Anavrinman: I'm a Drupal guy. Desperately looking to hire more Drupal guys, especially in the Washington, DC area. I don't know about other arenas in the IT field, but this particular one, they can't train people fast enough. Especially with Drupal 7 out.

/EIP if you're a drupal guy or wanna be one.



I certified in Drupal 6 (yep, i'm oldskool). I could refresh the ol' Drupal skills and recertify in 7 if the money is right.
 
2011-01-27 03:48:22 PM
HallsOfMandos: Thanks for all the input everyone!

Currently working help desk for a local hospital network - just general windows stuff, some app-specific things but nothing really deep (most of that stuff they just want us to collect specific pieces of data before we send the issue elsewhere). I have some experience working in AD creating accounts and adding security groups. I went in to a local cert mill that offers hands-on training for a variety of certs (mcse, ccna, etc) but I am really weary of adding several thousand in student loans to be able to pay for it - I get mixed reviews from people as far as what they think of the training these places give.


Find a place that will pay for your certs, possibly even the hospital you are working for. I would NOT recommend a diploma mill for IT certs. You won't have the experience and you will be out of a lot of cash. Experience > Certs. Find a job that will give you one or the other if not both and work for slave wages while your there beats the shiat outta having a some huge loan.
 
2011-01-27 03:49:57 PM
I have to second that Big Al has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.

Pretty much everything in this thread that you have stated is bunk. It's hard to re-image machines on an MS network. Explain that to my PXE boot SCM deployment. I mean it's so hard. You have to like hit F1 and select option 2, and then wait a whole 30 minutes for a freshly rebuilt pc. And think of those 2 minutes i had to spedn hitting F1. Oh the horror.

And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.

Last but not least, 50,000+ users and there hasn't been a virus outbreak in over 5 years. And even that one was mitigated within 20 minutes with little to no impact.

Seriously dude, if you are giving people advice on IT, you should probably just STFU as you obviously have no experience in this field.

Ok, one last thing. I use Exchange for every one of my side clients. My oldest client is still running 2003, 50 users. Been my client for 10 years. I've had an issue with the server once, it needed a reboot due to a space issue. Real POS product there requiring me to reboot off schedule once in 10 years.
 
2011-01-27 03:50:18 PM
Anavrinman: /EIP if you're a drupal guy or wanna be one.

Not in D.C., but not too familiar with Drupal. Curious, how does it compare to Wordpress, phpWebSite, CMS Made Simple, PHPNuke, DotNetNuke, PostNuke, e107, etc. (all of which I have used)?
 
2011-01-27 03:54:14 PM
"weary" should be "leery"

....been a looooong week here.
 
2011-01-27 03:55:06 PM
guidonet9:
Ok, one last thing. I use Exchange for every one of my side clients. My oldest client is still running 2003, 50 users. Been my client for 10 years. I've had an issue with the server once, it needed a reboot due to a space issue. Real POS product there requiring me to reboot off schedule once in 10 years.


While I very much feel the same way about Exchange one thing you have to admit, when things go wrong they go really wrong. And Exchange especially 2003 and before is far from a treat to restore if you are looking a blown IS. Exchange 2007 and especially Virtualized Exchange servers have dramatically decreased recovery times however.

/running ISINTEG on a 40+ gig information store is the suck
//VMWare how do I love thee, let me count the ways.....
 
2011-01-27 03:57:42 PM
altinos: Anavrinman: /EIP if you're a drupal guy or wanna be one.

Not in D.C., but not too familiar with Drupal. Curious, how does it compare to Wordpress, phpWebSite, CMS Made Simple, PHPNuke, DotNetNuke, PostNuke, e107, etc. (all of which I have used)?


For large scale integrations, it's amazing. The framework itself can really handle almost anything.

If you're just trying to build a quick website, go with something like ExpressionEngine.
 
2011-01-27 04:00:54 PM
Big Al 2011-01-27 11:58:28 AM

Every time I call the help desk I want to smash my head in. But that's only because 15 hour wonders who couldn't tell you the difference between windows and mac and only read pre-determined sentences then submit a ticket to elevate the issue if their ignorance can't resolve it. most of the time they want to get you off the phone quickly so they can get back to surfing the web and talking on their cell phone.


"And i want a roomfull of people like them handing me your ticket. What a great gig to be tier2"

To bad thats not me. My job is to figure out someway to get the people I talk to to go to the correct place and put in simple information in order to resolve their problem. If they are cool and corporative I can usually handle them. I have however come to the conclusion that some people can't be happy. Its people like that who shape your help desk. The toxic ones who are unwilling to help themselves even a little. I'm sure staring at the small exposure I get in my job to keep peoples cable modem and email working that you are not going to get a person at your best when at least once a day some one gives them sh*t for no reason. Who feel a need to address the huge problem they have with something that I use and its working okay. My desk computer is connected to the same system that they are using but somehow that tool bar fest that is their desktop isn't working then it has to be someone eles fault. example below.

www.cguyz.com



/Whew that felt good
//that is all
 
2011-01-27 04:01:14 PM
Devlik: guidonet9:
Ok, one last thing. I use Exchange for every one of my side clients. My oldest client is still running 2003, 50 users. Been my client for 10 years. I've had an issue with the server once, it needed a reboot due to a space issue. Real POS product there requiring me to reboot off schedule once in 10 years.

While I very much feel the same way about Exchange one thing you have to admit, when things go wrong they go really wrong. And Exchange especially 2003 and before is far from a treat to restore if you are looking a blown IS. Exchange 2007 and especially Virtualized Exchange servers have dramatically decreased recovery times however.

/running ISINTEG on a 40+ gig information store is the suck
//VMWare how do I love thee, let me count the ways.....


ESXi = WIN
 
2011-01-27 04:05:11 PM
What the hell is a pension?
 
2011-01-27 04:06:00 PM
HallsOfMandos: Thanks for all the input everyone!

Currently working help desk for a local hospital network - just general windows stuff, some app-specific things but nothing really deep (most of that stuff they just want us to collect specific pieces of data before we send the issue elsewhere). I have some experience working in AD creating accounts and adding security groups. I went in to a local cert mill that offers hands-on training for a variety of certs (mcse, ccna, etc) but I am really weary of adding several thousand in student loans to be able to pay for it - I get mixed reviews from people as far as what they think of the training these places give.


Don't pay a cert mill your money to get certified. If your job won't pay for it, buy the books and dedicate an hour or two a night on it till you're ready. Then pay the $125 to take the test.

You hear a lot of mixed reviews as to whether certs are worth it or not, but in the end all you have to do is go to Dice or any job sites and start looking at requirements for IT jobs. Most, if not all of them, either require a cert or "strongly prefer" them. The fact is, HR types and hiring managers still look for that.

Nothing beats hands-on training, but you may as well lay the ground work and learn the basics. You can always build a home lab and experiment, and having those certs might get your foot in the door someplace to gain some real world experience.
 
2011-01-27 04:12:14 PM
Devlik: HallsOfMandos: Thanks for all the input everyone!

Currently working help desk for a local hospital network - just general windows stuff, some app-specific things but nothing really deep (most of that stuff they just want us to collect specific pieces of data before we send the issue elsewhere). I have some experience working in AD creating accounts and adding security groups. I went in to a local cert mill that offers hands-on training for a variety of certs (mcse, ccna, etc) but I am really weary of adding several thousand in student loans to be able to pay for it - I get mixed reviews from people as far as what they think of the training these places give.

Find a place that will pay for your certs, possibly even the hospital you are working for. I would NOT recommend a diploma mill for IT certs. You won't have the experience and you will be out of a lot of cash. Experience > Certs. Find a job that will give you one or the other if not both and work for slave wages while your there beats the shiat outta having a some huge loan.


Oh and I forgot Transcenders (new window) is god like, worth every penny.
 
2011-01-27 04:47:16 PM
While I very much feel the same way about Exchange one thing you have to admit, when things go wrong they go really wrong. And Exchange especially 2003 and before is far from a treat to restore if you are looking a blown IS. Exchange 2007 and especially Virtualized Exchange servers have dramatically decreased recovery times however.

/running ISINTEG on a 40+ gig information store is the suck
//VMWare how do I love thee, let me count the ways.....

I'll definitely agree recovery can be a pain. For that i only have experience with smaller shops and have had great success using ontrack powercontrols for recovery. Lets you mount the edb and export it all to pst's similar to exmerge, but much more intuitive and user friendly. Probably doesnt work on 2010 but ill find out soon enough.

Has VMWare been a lifesaver or what? This has saved me so much time over the last few years, i should almost pay them. Almost.

HallsOfMandos - I can tell you this about how i got into this field. I started out with some very crappy small businesses doing their internal support. Eventually i quit that and setup a small web hosting business when you could still charge 100 a month to host sites. While that was going i went around to local businesses and got a few gigs supporting them. Did that for a few years until i needed something more steady (kids necessitate that sometimes). Then got extremely lucky and landed the job i have now working for a large bank.

I only have my GED (long story). I work with guys who just have certs, or just degrees, or both. Some even are PHD's. We all agree on the same thing. You either have the knack for this stuff or you don't. Some of what you get from college or a cert can be useful, but you could always learn any of that on your own. It really depends on the company you are applying for. I've been rejected simply because of the GED. But any job i have ever worked i get stellar reviews and am generally looked on as someone who gets the job done, which in the end is all anyone wants.

My personal opinion is, if a company is hiring based solely on creds and not experience, you probably don't want to work there unless you're a future workplace shooter.
 
2011-01-27 04:54:26 PM
GookNukem: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
bump: You wouldn't even need an IT department if you'd ween them off of the PC teet. Macs all around and you might actually get some productive work out of people...

HAHA...


>>

You can laugh but it's true. I have seen the IT dept at my company run around fixing virus outbreaks, windows corruptions, spyware, slowdown caused by everything from spyware viruses and registry errors, windows updates corrupting systems, etc.

Osx is such a superior platform in every respect, and deployment is built in with ARD, rather than buying expensive applications then learning how stupid they are like Altiris.

Your IT department sucks. Virus outbreak? Spyware? Not in a looooong time, sparky. A proper MS network with proper safeguards and proper GP restrictions doesn't really have a problem with this. I haven't seen one in at least seven years and I support ~4000 machines in an educational environment. Is it perfect? Naw. But, I can just about guarantee neither is your mythical OSX land of puppies and kittens where the pillows are oh so fluffy. I'm not automatically a MacOS hater, but most enterprise level software isn't written for it and most people don't know how to use it. You have to support the world you live in, not the one you wish you did.

/State IT worker getting a kick.


I also work for the state in academia, in a large inner city school system. We have 10,000 PC devices and 8,000 Macs. 60 or so Windows and SuSe Linux servers and 40 OS X Servers.

I am a sys admin and from an end user stand point OS X out of the box not only is more secure, and more stable, offers a better end user experience.

Problem is, Windows Sys Admins don't want to learn anything new, so often times the Macs are left to rot, sit there, or just plain ignored.

I could go into all the technical aspects of how Windows is the worst OS out there, the registry is bloated and a single point of failure to the whole OS, and other rants I typically do with Windows.

Been in IT for over decade, supporting both Windows platform and Macs as well as Linux.

The fact as a sys admin I can write, ruby/shell/python scripts out of the box to configure my macs over, well what does Windows have the power shell? big whoop. The fact that it uses self contained applications, so an app crashes I don't have to reimage the whole system, and a lot of times I can fix it with out reinstalling the app.

The biggest problem with OS X is that when comparing server products to Microsoft's pretty robust Active Directory and Exchange, it is a bit lacking. Not really that much lacking though, and I will give MS credit for their back end products, which are leagues better than their desktop clients.

Add into the fact that Apple really gives two craps about the enterprise market, which means you have to have a sys admin that knows what they are doing (command line, can code in a few languages, etc) or invest in third party tools. Compare that to Windows and you are still in the same boat. You pay a license for AV software, security software, imaging software, crap like deep freeze and other products you need to lock down a Windows box.

I think that Apple will be a real contender in enterprise in the next 5 to 10 years, and I mean like where it is very common to see most offices 50% mac and 50% PC and many places just offering their users a choice.
 
2011-01-27 05:02:36 PM
What about the inconvenience of relocating to India?


My most recent experience with a help call was for my AT&T DSL router. I had already trouble shot the situation down to the router itself. (somehow it had lost the WAN password provided by the phone company rep when he installed it)

Despite knowing what the problem was and what was needed to fix it, I spent over an hour going through the tech guy's checklist (try to start your browser, OK what does it say? Restart the computer. Try to connect. Restart the router. Try to connect. etc, etc.) until we came to the same conclusion I had had at the start of the call.

/CSB
 
2011-01-27 05:06:53 PM
drunkenmidnight: GookNukem: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
I think that Apple will be a real contender in enterprise in the next 5 to 10 years, and I mean like where it is very common to see most offices 50% mac and 50% PC and many places just offering their users a choice.


[OhWaitYoureSerious.jpg]

Not to be a dick but an inner-city school system is not an enterprise, which explains why you might think that.
 
2011-01-27 05:08:39 PM
guidonet9: I have to second that Big Al has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.

Pretty much everything in this thread that you have stated is bunk. It's hard to re-image machines on an MS network. Explain that to my PXE boot SCM deployment. I mean it's so hard. You have to like hit F1 and select option 2, and then wait a whole 30 minutes for a freshly rebuilt pc. And think of those 2 minutes i had to spedn hitting F1. Oh the horror.

And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.

Last but not least, 50,000+ users and there hasn't been a virus outbreak in over 5 years. And even that one was mitigated within 20 minutes with little to no impact.

Seriously dude, if you are giving people advice on IT, you should probably just STFU as you obviously have no experience in this field.

Ok, one last thing. I use Exchange for every one of my side clients. My oldest client is still running 2003, 50 users. Been my client for 10 years. I've had an issue with the server once, it needed a reboot due to a space issue. Real POS product there requiring me to reboot off schedule once in 10 years.


Yeah but to be honest, viruses are sort of a thing of the past. How many self propagating viruses are out there infecting machines in the wild?

Really the weakest link in your environment is your users. Malware/spyware/trojans embed themselves in what looks like legit software to the common user. They install it, bam infected. As long as things like Active X allow for kernel hooks into the OS with no authentication there will always be a way to escalate malicious code.

Look at the pwn to own contests, every single OS pwned in under 10 minutes. All of them rooted from them going to a website which escalated malicious code and rooted the machine. This is because giant web based CMSes and web technologies are convoluted with so much crap that is is near impossible to debug all the security holes in them.

Also as long as Microsoft allows things access via kernel hook via an API there will always be security risks. Not that Linux/Unix is completely immune to such things, but having that POSIX compliant set of permissions does help.

I am not a hacker, or a developer, but I could probably whip something up that looked legit and really opened a back door on your computer and upload it to the Internet as freeware. Or better yet, hide my little trojan in pirated software and put it out on torrents, then everyone who wants a free copy of the latest version of whatever app that is, gets my exploit.

I have only seen one virus attack in the past 10 years actually affect anything and it was just a mass mailer. We had to shut down email for a few hours to get it out, and then that was that. I haven't see a virus ever take down a whole network. I have seen some idiot in IT that I work with loop a switch and storm control not catch it and take down a network. I've also witness AT&T cut their own fiber, and their own back up fiber line and kill our WAN for 2 days in a row....lets just say AT&T gave us some free broadband after that.
 
2011-01-27 05:12:48 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: drunkenmidnight: GookNukem: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
I think that Apple will be a real contender in enterprise in the next 5 to 10 years, and I mean like where it is very common to see most offices 50% mac and 50% PC and many places just offering their users a choice.

[OhWaitYoureSerious.jpg]

Not to be a dick but an inner-city school system is not an enterprise, which explains why you might think that.



It's OK you're not a dick, but let me break it down for you.

30,000 users
10,000 PC clients
8,000 Mac clients
several hundred servers
Network printers
thousands of wireless APs
Cisco backbone
Windows, SuSe Linux and OS X Servers
federal security standards we have to enforce(protect children from x)
data center with redundant servers, a generator, and back ups.

I would say it is pretty comparable to what any enterprise out there has, just like any university as well.

We write our own in house web based products for a lot of what we do. I create images, packages, policies and deploy them over the network and then deal with kids who try to hack it all the time, and yes physical access trumps security so some kids get smart and google the right questions.

If I was a sys admin in the private sector, I'd probably do a lot less and get paid a lot more.
 
2011-01-27 05:18:41 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 03:28:12 PM

You know how I know that you have no farking clue what you're talking about?

/Really there is no such thing as an "Apple Server" anymore
//Even when there was, it had nowhere near the options a proper server does


That's only a recent thing, Apple X-Servers were priced about the same as any Dell or HP, they are being phased out the end of this month I think but only because they were never popular


What "options" don't osx servers have? Besides not having blades, they have everything you could ask for and can run 3 environments, windows, mac, linux/unix. Can't ask for much more options than that
 
2011-01-27 05:23:05 PM
guidonet9 Quote 2011-01-27 03:49:57 PM
I have to second that Big Al has absolutely no idea what he is talking about.

Pretty much everything in this thread that you have stated is bunk. It's hard to re-image machines on an MS network. Explain that to my PXE boot SCM deployment. I mean it's so hard. You have to like hit F1 and select option 2, and then wait a whole 30 minutes for a freshly rebuilt pc. And think of those 2 minutes i had to spedn hitting F1. Oh the horror.


Who said it's hard to reimage machines? It takes time depending on how your system is setup, not everyone walks into a new job and revamps the network, especially when we are talking about state/federal systems. So that's strike 1 for you


And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.


LULZ you mean they make apps that can run on a Linux/Unix platform but magically can't run on osx? You're a grade A moran who needs to stop pretending he knows anything about osx as you just proved it there.


Last but not least, 50,000+ users and there hasn't been a virus outbreak in over 5 years. And even that one was mitigated within 20 minutes with little to no impact.


I'm not talking about just an outbreak, although it must be nice to work in such a closed environment with up to date hardware/software when you have endless dollars to spend. I'm talking about sending techs out to reimage machines due to viruses or spyware, windows updates that brick a machine, etc.


Seriously dude, if you are giving people advice on IT, you should probably just STFU as you obviously have no experience in this field.


Says someone who thinks an app that runs in a Linux environment wouldn't be able to run on osx-server?


Ok, one last thing. I use Exchange for every one of my side clients. My oldest client is still running 2003, 50 users. Been my client for 10 years. I've had an issue with the server once, it needed a reboot due to a space issue. Real POS product there requiring me to reboot off schedule once in 10 years.


So you never have to upgrade exchange? Or hunt nagging strange issues? It's nice you work in such a limited environment with basic users, not everyone is setup just like you, but keep preaching to me about how your experience must be everyone elses because you get A running B and it works fine.
 
2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM
drunkenmidnight: KiTTeNs_on_AciD: drunkenmidnight: GookNukem: Big Al: The_Pirate Quote 2011-01-27 12:01:49 PM
I think that Apple will be a real contender in enterprise in the next 5 to 10 years, and I mean like where it is very common to see most offices 50% mac and 50% PC and many places just offering their users a choice.

[OhWaitYoureSerious.jpg]

Not to be a dick but an inner-city school system is not an enterprise, which explains why you might think that.


It's OK you're not a dick, but let me break it down for you.

30,000 users
10,000 PC clients
8,000 Mac clients
several hundred servers
Network printers
thousands of wireless APs
Cisco backbone
Windows, SuSe Linux and OS X Servers
federal security standards we have to enforce(protect children from x)
data center with redundant servers, a generator, and back ups.

I would say it is pretty comparable to what any enterprise out there has, just like any university as well.

We write our own in house web based products for a lot of what we do. I create images, packages, policies and deploy them over the network and then deal with kids who try to hack it all the time, and yes physical access trumps security so some kids get smart and google the right questions.

If I was a sys admin in the private sector, I'd probably do a lot less and get paid a lot more.


I was serious that I wasn't trying to be a dick. It wasn't a swipe at the variety of hardware you have deployed either, it's simply an observation that a school system is not an enterprise and as such has different needs. I've consulted for a few different public school systems, I know some of them have impressive technology budgets.

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.
 
2011-01-27 05:24:08 PM
RussianPooper:
You're talking about DBAs. That's one tiny aspect of IT. Trust me, people that actually know system and network architecture are making more than ever.

Also, the days of just taking a few classes and expecting a bunch of money are over because there are a lot more people that know how to do all this stuff. If you have good experience and can understand how to do more than the textbooks show, you can make decent money. If you can combine it with knowledge of another field (such as finance) you can be invaluable, since most IT people only know IT.


Well, my 'few classes' in helping me get my Oracle DBA certs took over 6 months. On top of the CS degree. Sorry, I think your premise is FOS, as IT is all too often regard as the 'necessary evil' to executive management. And I think I'm closer to the mark since I've worked with a crapload of Fortune500 companies and have consultanted for state and fed government.



xynix:
You're both talking pure technical as well. I just hired a new technical consultant who does 0 hands on. He simply follows me around and fields technical questions on our products. His salary is $175k a year.

At the sales end we're talking even higher .. easily into the $300k a year range.

Once you've been hands on for awhile look to go into consulting if you want the money then slide into sales if you want even more money and can handle the pressure.



I have my own business. I consulted in Programming Services and applications for quite a few years. Seriously, if you are paying someone 175K/yr to talk technical, I would have fired you in a new york second.

To a lot of people on fark, 60-80K is super great dough. To someone who made (and EARNED) 6 figures, not so much.
 
2011-01-27 05:26:54 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?
 
2011-01-27 05:27:28 PM
Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 03:28:12 PM

You know how I know that you have no farking clue what you're talking about?

/Really there is no such thing as an "Apple Server" anymore
//Even when there was, it had nowhere near the options a proper server does

That's only a recent thing, Apple X-Servers were priced about the same as any Dell or HP, they are being phased out the end of this month I think but only because they were never popular


What "options" don't osx servers have? Besides not having blades, they have everything you could ask for and can run 3 environments, windows, mac, linux/unix. Can't ask for much more options than that


Well for one, Exchange and AD just work, and are very easy to use and understand. You ever try to use Exchange from the command line? It's syntax is pretty much straight spoken English. Don't get me wrong, I hate Windows with a passion, but for the masses it is easy to use.

OS X Server iCal service is not that great. I had tons of issues with it, so is the iChat service. In fact my servers only run these services:

AFP
SMB
Netboot
SUS
Open Directory

With MCX and OD being nearly identical on the server/client sides, you really in all honesty don't need OD. With better implemented third party tools (Casper, Munki, Absolute) you really don't need OS X Server.

The real truth is, Apple just came into the game too late. No one wants to dump their whole back bone infrastructure for something that does the same thing and in many regards isn't all that needed. It just would cost too much money. We spent millions implementing our apple infrastructure, and then some of on top of that ironing things out. If I had to do it all over again, and with my 5 years of running it here, I may do some things different this time around.

Which is too bad, because I think OS X Server has a lot of promise with things like XGRID, iTunesU and Pod Cast Server/Producer, you could really do some awesome stuff with your users and their business/education. I think Apple will just allow their server OS to be virtualized on non Apple hardware to be honest and just stay out of the server hardware market.
 
2011-01-27 05:33:01 PM
Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 03:28:12 PM

You know how I know that you have no farking clue what you're talking about?

/Really there is no such thing as an "Apple Server" anymore
//Even when there was, it had nowhere near the options a proper server does

That's only a recent thing, Apple X-Servers were priced about the same as any Dell or HP, they are being phased out the end of this month I think but only because they were never popular


What "options" don't osx servers have? Besides not having blades, they have everything you could ask for and can run 3 environments, windows, mac, linux/unix. Can't ask for much more options than that


I had the pleasure of dealing with a Mac Server a few years back.

I've managed probably thousands of servers, Windows NT-2008, Linux in probably 20 different flavors, and I have to say... the X-Serve is basically the eMachine of the server world.

This server was awful. It was basically Mac OSX in a 1RU chassis.

My favorite part about it was you could change the Root password for SSH, etc... but when you logged directly onto the console, you had to use 'Root' with no password. We called Apple support to see what the deal was, and it turns out they stopped making that version of server, and had a new model out. Their solution was to just buy a new server to fix it.

The guy was amazed we still had this server for 2 years, and said we should have replaced it a year earlier before they stopped supporting it.

This stupid stupid f*cking server was for our creative group. They were under the impression they required a Mac server to host files for their Macs. We migrated the file shares off that piece of sh*t server and gave them a share on a Windows server... which did require a username/password for any authentication attempt.


You show me an IT guy with a Mac Server, and I'll show you an IT guy that can be replaced by the co-pilot on Airplane.
 
2011-01-27 05:33:08 PM
Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?


From experience. Obviously it isn't just me saying it either, seeing as the entire market fully rejected the product.
 
2011-01-27 05:35:21 PM
Big Al: And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.

LULZ you mean they make apps that can run on a Linux/Unix platform but magically can't run on osx? You're a grade A moran who needs to stop pretending he knows anything about osx as you just proved it there.


Ok. how about this. Can you find a fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX, and is supported by Oracle, SAP, or any other real enterprise software vendor?

That will never happen. But can you simply show me one Fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX and is supported by EMC, Hitachi, or any other SAN vendor?
 
2011-01-27 05:38:52 PM
...[truncated]...
I was serious that I wasn't trying to be a dick. It wasn't a swipe at the variety of hardware you have deployed either, it's simply an observation that a school system is not an enterprise and as such has different needs. I've consulted for a few different public school systems, I know some of them have impressive technology budgets.

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.

Oh yeah man I am not mad. The technology aspect of enterprise versus education is nearly identical, the method of management/use is definitely different. There is some sys admin in the private sector doing the same crap I am doing every day but meeting his users needs, which are different. I jumped the gun, because I sometimes hate it when people in the IT field think schools are run by morons. Managed by morons, perhaps, but that is up for debate, but our IT department is pretty solid and I do things many enterprises cannot do. A lot of my scripts are on mailing lists and are running services for other IT departments around the world. I am not bragging because I could care less, I share my scripts for free. So, I just jumped the gun on you, sorry mang!


As for Apple in the enterprise, I am talking about clients. I should have been more specific. Security stand point it is superior. Certified POSIX compliant and Certified Unix compliant. Oh, and I am comparing it to Windows, not Linux just so we are clear. The approach apple takes is quite genius, if you are familiar with NeXT or OS X you should already know about unix property lists, configuration files, and thing running in their own environments (self contained).

I don't see Apple dominating the server market. They discontinued their Xserves as everyone knows, but not their Server OS. They are instead releasing server products like a Mac Pro Server and a Mac Mini server, which on the enterprise level is laughable. I know. No lights out management, no rack mount, no redundant power supplies = not a contender.

The fact you can easily have Macs authenticate against AD/ED and easily manage them with out a server (as long as you have the know how) it makes them a great contender for enterprises for their clients. Overall cost of ownership is lower in my opinion. All of our PCs have a 3 to 4 year replacement cycle. Macs have a 5 to 6. This is not because the Mac is more expensive. This is because it is a closed platform designed to run their OS from the ground up. They have lower requirements and if you look at any of OS X system requirements over the years you will see that their OSes always support systems 4 to 5 years old.

You cannot really put Windows 7 on a 5 year old PC, you could put 10.6 on a 5 year old Mac (except in this case 10.6 no longer supports PPC hardware), and I am willing to bet all the first generation core 2 duo Macs that came out in 2006 will easily support OS X 10.7 and run it decently when it comes out.

This of course, is like, just my opinion based on the jobs I have had and experiences I have gone through. I also used to moon light sub contract for a few tech companies as a second job, but quit doing that after 2 years of dealing with them not cutting me checks on time, so I have been in a wide variety of environments.
 
2011-01-27 05:38:54 PM
Cubansaltyballs: Big Al: And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.

LULZ you mean they make apps that can run on a Linux/Unix platform but magically can't run on osx? You're a grade A moran who needs to stop pretending he knows anything about osx as you just proved it there.

Ok. how about this. Can you find a fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX, and is supported by Oracle, SAP, or any other real enterprise software vendor?

That will never happen. But can you simply show me one Fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX and is supported by EMC, Hitachi, or any other SAN vendor?



HAHA, queue the Bu-Bu-Bu-But the Xserves had 2 GB NICs and supported JUMBO FRAMES?!?!?!
 
2011-01-27 05:39:49 PM
Hmm must have wrapped that into a link tag....FARK NEEDS AN EDIT BUTTON please
 
2011-01-27 05:40:06 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?

From experience. Obviously it isn't just me saying it either, seeing as the entire market fully rejected the product.


I can vouch for this.

Here's a Pic I found of a Mac OSX Server Admin team:

www.vagabondish.com
 
2011-01-27 05:41:41 PM
Cubansaltyballs: Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 03:28:12 PM

You know how I know that you have no farking clue what you're talking about?

/Really there is no such thing as an "Apple Server" anymore
//Even when there was, it had nowhere near the options a proper server does

That's only a recent thing, Apple X-Servers were priced about the same as any Dell or HP, they are being phased out the end of this month I think but only because they were never popular


What "options" don't osx servers have? Besides not having blades, they have everything you could ask for and can run 3 environments, windows, mac, linux/unix. Can't ask for much more options than that

I had the pleasure of dealing with a Mac Server a few years back.

I've managed probably thousands of servers, Windows NT-2008, Linux in probably 20 different flavors, and I have to say... the X-Serve is basically the eMachine of the server world.

This server was awful. It was basically Mac OSX in a 1RU chassis.

My favorite part about it was you could change the Root password for SSH, etc... but when you logged directly onto the console, you had to use 'Root' with no password. We called Apple support to see what the deal was, and it turns out they stopped making that version of server, and had a new model out. Their solution was to just buy a new server to fix it.

The guy was amazed we still had this server for 2 years, and said we should have replaced it a year earlier before they stopped supporting it.

This stupid stupid f*cking server was for our creative group. They were under the impression they required a Mac server to host files for their Macs. We migrated the file shares off that piece of sh*t server and gave them a share on a Windows server... which did require a username/password for any authentication attempt.


You show me an IT guy with a Mac Server, and I'll show you an IT guy that can be replaced by the co-pilot on Airplane.


Having dealt with OS X server extensively over the years including netinfo and directory services, you are full of it.

The root password comes not being set, and you don't leave it blank. If you do not set one when you set up directory services it uses your admin password since diradmin is basically UID 0 for directory services.

I am guessing you did not RTFM
 
2011-01-27 05:45:07 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Cubansaltyballs: Big Al: And Mac servers? Are you on crack? I work in the financial industry supporting 6000+ servers. They dont make even a quarter of what we run for mac. Plenty of Linux, plenty of Windows, but definitely not Mac.

LULZ you mean they make apps that can run on a Linux/Unix platform but magically can't run on osx? You're a grade A moran who needs to stop pretending he knows anything about osx as you just proved it there.

Ok. how about this. Can you find a fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX, and is supported by Oracle, SAP, or any other real enterprise software vendor?

That will never happen. But can you simply show me one Fiber-channel HBA that will work on OSX and is supported by EMC, Hitachi, or any other SAN vendor?


HAHA, queue the Bu-Bu-Bu-But the Xserves had 2 GB NICs and supported JUMBO FRAMES?!?!?!


So... iSCSI.

The funny thing about this Mac fan-boy is he so in love with Apple products that he can't see what a joke X-Serves are/were.

Here's what Big Al sees:
images.apple.com



This is what any competent sys admin sees:
www.blogcdn.com
 
2011-01-27 05:46:11 PM
@drunken

I will concede that some companies already are, and others will continue to do limited deployments of Macs to end users. That is just the reality of things now whether I disagree or not. Personally, I'd rather see more thin clients and citrix going to users that really don't require a full blown PC, but that's just me.

Just as long as we're in agreement that Apple doesn't make anything worth even a single U in a data center or worthy of a mission critical app/service/storage function. I'm with those who say the server software may have a place in the future but only if they get on board with virtualization.
 
2011-01-27 05:46:44 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?

From experience. Obviously it isn't just me saying it either, seeing as the entire market fully rejected the product.


Did you honestly work with any of them and compare though? Apple did not have contenders in every serer market, but they came close in the entry level 1U rack mount. They were comparable in price to every other vendor out there, and could run every OS out there.

I think they definitely lacked scalability for sure, and when you work for a super large enterprise say Google, or Apple even, you are going to run Linux. In fact I know Apple runs a Linux back bone. I have Interviewed to work in their data center. In fact I am still in the interview process, on number 3. Waiting to see if I pass/fail and go to the next round. They run Linux and they probably don't run it off Xserves.

However, Xserve hardware as of the 10.5 release was certified to run everything. Linux, Unix, Solaris, Oracle, OS X, Windows and so forth. The problem is they were too little, too late and did not offer much for scaling up.
 
2011-01-27 05:47:16 PM
For all the IT / Helpdesk bashers here.....We read your email....we know what websites you visit and we have the pics from your cell phone.

"Do not FARK with us"

Tyler Durden
 
2011-01-27 05:47:51 PM
Ludendorff's Ghost: Yeah, baby, MAINFRAMES. How many lines of COBOL code are still out there? It's all gotta be maintained, too.

I can't be the only one that read this in the voice of the Evil Midnight Bomber.

/and yes, I knew COBOL at one point and could easily fall back into it
 
2011-01-27 05:51:08 PM
drunkenmidnight: Having dealt with OS X server extensively over the years including netinfo and directory services, you are full of it.

The root password comes not being set, and you don't leave it blank. If you do not set one when you set up directory services it uses your admin password since diradmin is basically UID 0 for directory services.

I am guessing you did not RTFM


Uhhhh.... no. When we would do passwd, the password would change for our ssh users. But directly from the Gui it was still blank.

We tried changing it from the gui, but it would not take.

We had a lot of Linux servers and a pretty competent admin. It was some bug that processed the root login differently from the console vs ssh. The only way for us to fix it was to upgrade, and pay for an upgrade contract or something.

Our solution was to disable the console, migrate the data, and kill the Mac Server.

Guess what... it worked.
 
2011-01-27 05:54:24 PM
HotSalsaZoot:

I have my own business. I consulted in Programming Services and applications for quite a few years. Seriously, if you are paying someone 175K/yr to talk technical, I would have fired you in a new york second.

To a lot of people on fark, 60-80K is super great dough. To someone who made (and EARNED) 6 figures, not so much.


You're obviously not involved in deals that I am or my technical people are. My division alone which is only about 15 people closed over 100 million in business last year. Spending 175k on a technical guy that can also talk business with a CIO is frankly a pittance when talking the numbers we talk.

My techie and I flew down to Mexico last week and closed a $1.5 million deal with about $6 million in drag. Your "little business" is irrelevant when dealing with these kinds of numbers and finding the right person to make shiat happen costs real money. Not $60k a year..hell I'll pay half that in taxes in January alone.
 
2011-01-27 05:55:45 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: @drunken

I will concede that some companies already are, and others will continue to do limited deployments of Macs to end users. That is just the reality of things now whether I disagree or not. Personally, I'd rather see more thin clients and citrix going to users that really don't require a full blown PC, but that's just me.

Just as long as we're in agreement that Apple doesn't make anything worth even a single U in a data center or worthy of a mission critical app/service/storage function. I'm with those who say the server software may have a place in the future but only if they get on board with virtualization.


I think that has a place too. Not in the high end though. You think IBM, Microsoft, Google, or Apple, or any other super large tech firm is going to run app servers and thin clients to their world-wide business offices?

Then you have graphic design, and other digital arts, where the technology need to run photoshop, maya, or any other high end app just won't cut it.

Now cue in the fact that Autodesk is releasing Auto CAD for the first time on OS X, means that Autodesk thinks there is a market for it. Apple is dominating the consumer market in many regards. I think like 1 in 4 people in the USA who own a computer own a Mac now. Don't get that confused with world market share, that is strictly USA consumer market share, which is just a drop in the ocean in world market share.

I used to hate Macs. I really did. I used to be a Windows fan boy, then I turned to Linux after the many disappointments MS gave me. I realize Linux is far from being a mainstream end user OS but give it time, it will some day get there. It doesn't have to happen anytime soon either, they can take their time and get it right. Then I was forced to support Macs professionally in 1999. My boss said, "No more Mac guys and no more PC guys! You are now all just tech guys and you fix and support everything." So I was forced to learn and support Macs. Took me years to warm up to them and I didn't really like them until about OS X 10.3, but sort of became a closet mac users when 10.2 came out.

Enterprise has many levels. Data center type stuff will be high end servers running some sort of Unix based OS most likely. Windows servers are really only good for managing Windows clients and services you give to the client which is specific to Microsoft, like exchange. Otherwise the license cost alone is just way not worth it for other things Linux can do for free.
 
2011-01-27 05:56:59 PM
 
2011-01-27 05:58:03 PM
drunkenmidnight: KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?

From experience. Obviously it isn't just me saying it either, seeing as the entire market fully rejected the product.

Did you honestly work with any of them and compare though? Apple did not have contenders in every serer market, but they came close in the entry level 1U rack mount. They were comparable in price to every other vendor out there, and could run every OS out there.

I think they definitely lacked scalability for sure, and when you work for a super large enterprise say Google, or Apple even, you are going to run Linux. In fact I know Apple runs a Linux back bone. I have Interviewed to work in their data center. In fact I am still in the interview process, on number 3. Waiting to see if I pass/fail and go to the next round. They run Linux and they probably don't run it off Xserves.

However, Xserve hardware as of the 10.5 release was certified to run everything. Linux, Unix, Solaris, Oracle, OS X, Windows and so forth. The problem is they were too little, too late and did not offer much for scaling up.


The problem isn't that. The problem is they tried to enter the enterprise market and treat it like the consumer market.

In an enterprise market, server will stay in production 5-7 years. People will not buy a new product just because a new version comes out. Enterprise sys admins need secure and reliable servers that run forever and don't fail. OSX might be fine for a consumer PC, but it is not ready for the enterprise.

If you want to enter the enterprise computing world, you have to make a bullet-proof product that will last 5-7 years. It has to secure, or can be secured. It cannot require intrusive or disrupting upgrades. The idea of just putting in a disk and re-imaging to the next version is not an option.

When Cisco entered the server business with UCS, they spent years and millions(billions?) of dollars making it solid.

Apple will always be viewed as a joke to the server community the same way Microsoft is to the cell phone community.

Apple will not take over the world, and they will not become the defacto server choice like they are for phones. Just get over it already. The servers sucked. I know it may be hard, but you're going to have to pull yourself together, pick up the pieces and worship them for something else.... they will never be an enterprise class vendor.
 
2011-01-27 05:58:49 PM
I run Solaris SPARC 64bit on my servers -- since 1997.
I sleep well at night.

The desktops are thin clients. Go ahead, load a virus on one. Load googie toolbar, Load itune or Aol messenger.

Turn it off, back on, Right back the way it was.

Next.

Back to playing solitaire on my bosses toy. (a mac)
How many business apps run on those anyway.?
 
2011-01-27 05:59:17 PM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: Having dealt with OS X server extensively over the years including netinfo and directory services, you are full of it.

The root password comes not being set, and you don't leave it blank. If you do not set one when you set up directory services it uses your admin password since diradmin is basically UID 0 for directory services.

I am guessing you did not RTFM

Uhhhh.... no. When we would do passwd, the password would change for our ssh users. But directly from the Gui it was still blank.

We tried changing it from the gui, but it would not take.

We had a lot of Linux servers and a pretty competent admin. It was some bug that processed the root login differently from the console vs ssh. The only way for us to fix it was to upgrade, and pay for an upgrade contract or something.

Our solution was to disable the console, migrate the data, and kill the Mac Server.

Guess what... it worked.


*sigh*

Link (new window)

OS X is a very specific type of Unix, in fact it is Apple's. It uses the berkley database to store user/password information. Things like passwd probably won't work on the root account. Also, you have been able to reset the root account by booting from an installer disk and using the password reset utility if you had local admin rights.

If you did not know how to create a local admin account you probably shouldn't have been using it in the first place.

Order a new server to fix a software problem? I am sorry dude that is total malarkey.
 
2011-01-27 05:59:48 PM
HotSalsaZoot: IT is all too often regarded as the 'necessary evil' to executive management.

"Of course, referring to the IT department as the Department of Necessary Evil has its upside too. Sooner or later the users get tired of the long name and just shorten it to Department of Evil. That's when you order new business cards." --T. Lassila, Tired Old Sysadmin, Aug. 30 2001
 
2011-01-27 06:05:52 PM
drunkenmidnight: Link (new window)

OS X is a very specific type of Unix, in fact it is Apple's. It uses the berkley database to store user/password information. Things like passwd probably won't work on the root account. Also, you have been able to reset the root account by booting from an installer disk and using the password reset utility if you had local admin rights.

If you did not know how to create a local admin account you probably shouldn't have been using it in the first place.

Order a new server to fix a software problem? I am sorry dude that is total malarkey.


Yeah. We had all the rights in the world to that box. When we did passwd, it worked fine for ssh... just not for the gui. Like I said before, but apparently you have a reading comprehension problem, is there was some software bug for the gui and password sh*t. We couldn't upgrade to a newer version because we did not have a support contract. The guy was amazed we hadn't already upgraded to a newer server since ours was EOL after 24 months.

How about this. Since Macs are so awesome, if you can find one fortune 500 company that uses Mac OSX Server for their mission critical apps, I'll buy you a life-size poster of Steve Jobs so you can beat off to it.
 
2011-01-27 06:06:28 PM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: KiTTeNs_on_AciD: Big Al: KiTTeNs_on_AciD Quote 2011-01-27 05:23:43 PM

If you really believe Apple will be a "real contender" in the enterprise market within the coming years.... could you please identify one product they currently make that is suitable for data center deployment? They pulled the plug on Xserve because they were absolute trash and it was obvious that they weren't even playing the same sport as the companies who build real enterprise servers.


>>>>

Where do you get your info from? Absolute trash?

From experience. Obviously it isn't just me saying it either, seeing as the entire market fully rejected the product.

Did you honestly work with any of them and compare though? Apple did not have contenders in every serer market, but they came close in the entry level 1U rack mount. They were comparable in price to every other vendor out there, and could run every OS out there.

I think they definitely lacked scalability for sure, and when you work for a super large enterprise say Google, or Apple even, you are going to run Linux. In fact I know Apple runs a Linux back bone. I have Interviewed to work in their data center. In fact I am still in the interview process, on number 3. Waiting to see if I pass/fail and go to the next round. They run Linux and they probably don't run it off Xserves.

However, Xserve hardware as of the 10.5 release was certified to run everything. Linux, Unix, Solaris, Oracle, OS X, Windows and so forth. The problem is they were too little, too late and did not offer much for scaling up.

The problem isn't that. The problem is they tried to enter the enterprise market and treat it like the consumer market.

In an enterprise market, server will stay in production 5-7 years. People will not buy a new product just because a new version comes out. Enterprise sys admins need secure and reliable servers that run forever and don't fail. OSX might be fine for a consumer PC, but it is not ready for the enterprise.

If you want to enter the enterprise computing world, you have to make a bullet-proof product that will last 5-7 years. It has to secure, or can be secured. It cannot require intrusive or disrupting upgrades. The idea of just putting in a disk and re-imaging to the next version is not an option.

When Cisco entered the server business with UCS, they spent years and millions(billions?) of dollars making it solid.

Apple will always be viewed as a joke to the server community the same way Microsoft is to the cell phone community.

Apple will not take over the world, and they will not become the defacto server choice like they are for phones. Just get over it already. The servers sucked. I know it may be hard, but you're going to have to pull yourself together, pick up the pieces and worship them for something else.... they will never be an enterprise class vendor.


OK, well I am not saying Apple was a contender in the server market. I already said they weren't, with the exception of entry level 1U rack mount servers. Which had all the features you would want, with reliability. My 40 servers have been running for 5 years straight with zero hardware issues. I have had some software quirks but some of those could have been chalked up to my mistake, not Apple's. Since I keep a current rotation of 30 days of back ups for all services I just restored a service.

Also, you obviously did not RTFM or look into any solutions for what I bolded.

Macs can Netboot, which is their version of PXE boot. They can also target mode boot over firewire, which is farking pimp. Disk utility can restore images from an image file, no need for an optical drive and an OS Disc. Furthermore there are a plethora of command line binaries to automate this.

See, in a windows deployment with all their imaging software suites and bells and whistles (which are great products mind you) you still have to have some sort of User interaction.

My set up:

Mac netboots (which can be automated if I send out a bless command)
[automated process]
-client checks into database to get auto run data
-client immediately block copies proper images + packages based on auto run data
-client reboots
-first time run post install script configures machines

I don't have to press any damn buttons. I have automated it to the point where I can tell a client in Germany to netboot to it's nearest server and reimage, and when it is done run this script and I can do it from my apartment in the midwest, in my boxers drinking a beer at 10AM because that is how I roll.
 
2011-01-27 06:11:04 PM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: Link (new window)

OS X is a very specific type of Unix, in fact it is Apple's. It uses the berkley database to store user/password information. Things like passwd probably won't work on the root account. Also, you have been able to reset the root account by booting from an installer disk and using the password reset utility if you had local admin rights.

If you did not know how to create a local admin account you probably shouldn't have been using it in the first place.

Order a new server to fix a software problem? I am sorry dude that is total malarkey.

Yeah. We had all the rights in the world to that box. When we did passwd, it worked fine for ssh... just not for the gui. Like I said before, but apparently you have a reading comprehension problem, is there was some software bug for the gui and password sh*t. We couldn't upgrade to a newer version because we did not have a support contract. The guy was amazed we hadn't already upgraded to a newer server since ours was EOL after 24 months.

How about this. Since Macs are so awesome, if you can find one fortune 500 company that uses Mac OSX Server for their mission critical apps, I'll buy you a life-size poster of Steve Jobs so you can beat off to it.


The problem is, depending on your version, user information is stored in a berkley data base which is ecnrypted and built upon Apple's tech.

You should have used the following binaries

dscl
nicl
dsenableroot


As for OS X server, I already said it wasn't the bees knees, I am on a rant about OS X client and how bad ass it is. Linux can run almost all mac services a server can, and Macs can authenticate to all forms of Kerberized authentication. Not really a huge deal what runs your back bone because a Mac client can work with it, with a few exceptions.

I already agreed with Kittens that the OS X server hardware was a joke, and that their OS will most likely be virutalized on better server products.
 
2011-01-27 06:14:51 PM
drunkenmidnight: KiTTeNs_on_AciD: @drunken

I will concede that some companies already are, and others will continue to do limited deployments of Macs to end users. That is just the reality of things now whether I disagree or not. Personally, I'd rather see more thin clients and citrix going to users that really don't require a full blown PC, but that's just me.

Just as long as we're in agreement that Apple doesn't make anything worth even a single U in a data center or worthy of a mission critical app/service/storage function. I'm with those who say the server software may have a place in the future but only if they get on board with virtualization.

I think that has a place too. Not in the high end though. You think IBM, Microsoft, Google, or Apple, or any other super large tech firm is going to run app servers and thin clients to their world-wide business offices?

Then you have graphic design, and other digital arts, where the technology need to run photoshop, maya, or any other high end app just won't cut it.



While I agree that thin clients / Citrix sessions are not ideal for all users, you do realize that even Google has receptionists, facilities maintenance, and physical security staffed in their global business offices right? These users only need email and some basic office applications. Perhaps a role specific application but since so many of these are being developed as a web service these days, the only application the user needs to run is a browser for them. A thin client is more than enough for that and they are very easy to manage and support.

I work for a global company on the Fortune 100 list. We have some of these in production, granted they are legacy gear from a conquest, but they stay because they are a very good solution in some instances. Not everyone is an engineer.
 
2011-01-27 06:21:13 PM
KiTTeNs_on_AciD: drunkenmidnight: KiTTeNs_on_AciD: @drunken

I will concede that some companies already are, and others will continue to do limited deployments of Macs to end users. That is just the reality of things now whether I disagree or not. Personally, I'd rather see more thin clients and citrix going to users that really don't require a full blown PC, but that's just me.

Just as long as we're in agreement that Apple doesn't make anything worth even a single U in a data center or worthy of a mission critical app/service/storage function. I'm with those who say the server software may have a place in the future but only if they get on board with virtualization.

I think that has a place too. Not in the high end though. You think IBM, Microsoft, Google, or Apple, or any other super large tech firm is going to run app servers and thin clients to their world-wide business offices?

Then you have graphic design, and other digital arts, where the technology need to run photoshop, maya, or any other high end app just won't cut it.


While I agree that thin clients / Citrix sessions are not ideal for all users, you do realize that even Google has receptionists, facilities maintenance, and physical security staffed in their global business offices right? These users only need email and some basic office applications. Perhaps a role specific application but since so many of these are being developed as a web service these days, the only application the user needs to run is a browser for them. A thin client is more than enough for that and they are very easy to manage and support.

I work for a global company on the Fortune 100 list. We have some of these in production, granted they are legacy gear from a conquest, but they stay because they are a very good solution in some instances. Not everyone is an engineer.


Oh yeah man, every technology has it's place for sure. I don't think you and I have actually disagreed on anything yet, just maybe slightly different opinions is all.

I am just not sure how much thing clients and things like the cloud will catch on. It will be interesting to see. I like aspects of both, and dislike.

We've looked at completely ditching our PC hardware here and go for thin client virtualization for the Windows boxes. I am not sure how far we go into it, because I am the Unix dude who gets to do all the Mac/Linux/Unix stuff because that is what I know best.

The team that runs the email/windows servers are doing the virtualization stuff.

I totally agree with not everyone being an engineer either which is why Mac OS X client is so appealing in my opinion. It is very intuitive and takes little resources to run compared to other OSes out there. I also think Linux will be a competitor in the near future. The newest releases of some distros are becoming very GUI heavy and very intuitive. Ubuntu 10.10 is very Mac-like.

Everything has it's place and as technology changes so will those things in place, but I would be hard set to say that even in my life time all desktops will be replaced with thin clients.

Not that you said that, but just my point.
 
2011-01-27 06:22:51 PM
xynix:
You're obviously not involved in deals that I am or my technical people are. My division alone which is only about 15 people closed over 100 million in business last year. Spending 175k on a technical guy that can also talk business with a CIO is frankly a pittance when talking the numbers we talk.

My techie and I flew down to Mexico last week and closed a $1.5 million deal with about $6 million in drag. Your "little business" is irrelevant when dealing with these kinds of numbers and finding the right person to make shiat happen costs real money. Not $60k a year..hell I'll pay half that in taxes in January alone.


A hundred mil a year is nothing nowadays. Closing a 1.5 mil deal is essentially like taking a piss at McD's to the real players in this area. You sound like a bloviated tech wannabee idiot who doesn't know shiat from shinola other than to blow figures out your ass. And anybody can quote any figure - after all, it's the net, remember? My dick is 15" long.
Oh, and my 'little business'? Like I said, you're a moron. You wouldn't know what I make or my revenues.
 
2011-01-27 06:24:42 PM
drunkenmidnight: See, in a windows deployment with all their imaging software suites and bells and whistles (which are great products mind you) you still have to have some sort of User interaction.

My set up:

Mac netboots (which can be automated if I send out a bless command)
[automated process]
-client checks into database to get auto run data
-client immediately block copies proper images + packages based on auto run data
-client reboots
-first time run post install script configures machines

I don't have to press any damn buttons. I have automated it to the point where I can tell a client in Germany to netboot to it's nearest server and reimage, and when it is done run this script and I can do it from my apartment in the midwest, in my boxers drinking a beer at 10AM because that is how I roll.


The funny thing about Windows machines are they don't require the re-image feature as often as Macs do. In our shop we had about 20 or Mac PCs and one sh*tty mac server. One time the guy bumped his power strip and his Mac wouldn't reboot right. Had to re-image it.

I've seen that happen with a Windows or real Linux machine.

This thread is full of real, enterprise level sys-admins, and they're telling you the same thing I am.

Macs are great for surfing the web or playing whatever gay pixie dust app your 9 year old wants... but when it comes to keeping a real business alive, you almost always have this:

Linux/Solaris/Tandem/AS400 servers running your big-hoss databases like SAP, Oracle, etc..

Windows 2003/2008 Servers running MS SQL for your small-med range databases.

Windows 2003/2008 running exchange

Windows 2003/2008 domain controllers

Linux servers for external facing websites, Bind, etc.

ESX server running all your small-med range applications

ESX on blades and SANs running these apps in a larger IT shop.

Windows PCs for the users.


What ends up happening is people use their Windows PCs to connect to their virtualized front-end of their apps, which talk to a database for their data.

The only place you see Macs are for specific groups. IT people try and keep the Macs to a minimum because it requires a second set of everything. Separate drivers which may not be available for all devices like printers, etc.. they need to have a whole extra set of software just for their Mac servers. Separate versions of AV, Outlook, etc..

In the end, it is just an extra headache with not a lot of real benefit. When you're managing 5000-50,000 end-user workstations, you need them to be the same. You need them to be consistent. And you need them to be reliable. Macs just don't offer all that for an enterprise. They are built for the consumer market, the same way Dell sells Inspirons, and whatever at Costco... but every enterprise will be using Optiplexes.

If Apple wants to enter the enterprise market, they will have to offer a new brand of workstations that are built for an IT shop to manage. They'll have to tweak their software so things can be interchangeable between Windows/Macs.

Bottom line is they'll have to make a large investment to appeal to the IT people that have say over what machines they have to deal with. Problem is, Apple thinks they're superior, and the problem isn't that they're not ready for Enterprise IT... it's that Enterprise IT guys are shunning them because Apple is just so f*cking awesome, that if Macs got out into the business, people would realize what hacks they were for not buying all their computers at Best-Buy next to the kitten mouse pads and $20.00 special monitor cleaning wipes. The only reason they would choose an inferior, non-awesome Windows machine is because the IT guys are stupid conformists that are just trying to make everyone else little conformists so they can keep their easy IT jobs.
 
2011-01-27 06:29:18 PM
Lots of IT jobs to be available soon... Is Windows 8 coming out already?
 
2011-01-27 06:33:03 PM
Cubansaltyballs, have to agree. Apple isn't ready for an arena of cross-over compatibility with PC's nor are they ready for offering anything in an Enterprise IT environment. PtoP and just keep buying those macs, the corporate motto.
 
2011-01-27 07:04:14 PM
Cubansaltyballs:

The funny thing about Windows machines are they don't require the re-image feature as often as Macs do. In our shop we had about 20 or Mac PCs and one sh*tty mac server. One time the guy bumped his power strip and his Mac wouldn't reboot right. Had to re-image it.

I've seen that happen with a Windows or real Linux machine.

This thread is full of real, enterprise level sys-admins, and they're telling you the same thing I am.

Macs are great for surfing the web or playing whatever gay pixie dust app your 9 year old wants... but when it comes to keeping a real business alive, you almost always have this:

Linux/Solaris/Tandem/AS400 servers running your big-hoss databases like SAP, Oracle, etc..

Windows 2003/2008 Servers running MS SQL for your small-med range databases.

Windows 2003/2008 running exchange

Windows 2003/2008 domain controllers

Linux servers for external facing websites, Bind, etc.

ESX server running all your small-med range applications

ESX on blades and SANs running these apps in a larger IT shop.

Windows PCs for the users.


What ends up happening is people use their Windows PCs to connect to their virtualized front-end of their apps, which talk to a database for their data.

The only place you see Macs are for specific groups. IT people try and keep the Macs to a minimum because it requires a second set of everything. Separate drivers which may not be available for all devices like printers, etc.. they need to have a whole extra set of software just for their Mac servers. Separate versions of AV, Outlook, etc..

In the end, it is just an extra headache with not a lot of real benefit. When you're managing 5000-50,000 end-user workstations, you need them to be the same. You need them to be consistent. And you need them to be reliable. Macs just don't offer all that for an enterprise. They are built for the consumer market, the same way Dell sells Inspirons, and whatever at Costco... but every enterprise will be using Optiplexes.

If Apple wants to enter the enterprise market, they will have to offer a new brand of workstations that are built for an IT shop to manage. They'll have to tweak their software so things can be interchangeable between Windows/Macs.

Bottom line is they'll have to make a large investment to appeal to the IT people that have say over what machines they have to deal with. Problem is, Apple thinks they're superior, and the problem isn't that they're not ready for Enterprise IT... it's that Enterprise IT guys are shunning them because Apple is just so f*cking awesome, that if Macs got out into the business, people would realize what hacks they were for not buying all their computers at Best-Buy next to the kitten mouse pads and $20.00 special monitor cleaning wipes. The only reason they would choose an inferior, non-awesome Windows machine is because the IT guys are stupid conformists that are just trying to make everyone else little conformists so they can keep their easy IT jobs.


You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

I hate SQL server and .NET. Also Microsoft is losing tons of market shares. Things like Drupal and Joomla are taking over the web end. Postgre sql server is uber powerful compared to MS products.

AS/400? People still use that trash? We had AS/400 at my old job and it was hardly a good product, the problem is we were locked into it.

You obviously haven't been reading what I write. Look up MCX, and tell you cannot make all Macs consistent.

You see there will be a shift in the future, and those that can adapt and learn new products are going to survive a lot longer. The London Stock Exchange ditched windows last year. It is all Linux now.

Again, your back end can be whatever because you can make a Mac authenticate and talk to everything. You keep telling me you cannot manage them in an enterprise environment and don't even know the first thing about them.

Real enterprise sys admins you say? In my book a real sys admin is someone that can get the job done with any technology, and can fully use the command line of all products and fully automate all processes including reverse engineering existing third party products to fit your needs or to write your own.

I know several giant companies/organizations that run Macs with zero Mac servers. They push out updates and manage their clients with no Mac servers.

The problem is, people like you who don't know anything else and just repeat only what you know.
 
2011-01-27 07:21:31 PM
Oh and you want to talk about blunders. I have seen a clean imaged machine with all up to date MS Windows patches blue screen on an office install. That is pretty far up on the fail scale. If your own products cause OS crashes when combined together it can cause issue.

Also, going on your reference Cuban, about bumping the power strip. Everyone knows if you have intensive disk I/O and lose power it can cause file system corruption. That is not exclusive to any OS or file system, that is just the nature of the beast.
 
2011-01-27 07:29:50 PM
Everyone knows if you have intensive disk I/O and lose power it can cause file system corruption. That is not exclusive to any OS or file system, that is just the nature of the beast.

Not really a common problem at all. UPS takes care of that. In the DB world: commit/rollback, and hot backups via shell scripts, so it's not much of an issue there either.
 
2011-01-27 07:55:29 PM
HotSalsaZoot: Not really a common problem at all. UPS takes care of that. In the DB world: commit/rollback, and hot backups via shell scripts, so it's not much of an issue there either.

Wow, you mean some guy in brown shorts will fix my corrupt files? Awesome. Can he leave them on the porch or do I have to sign for them?
 
2011-01-27 07:56:32 PM
HotSalsaZoot: Everyone knows if you have intensive disk I/O and lose power it can cause file system corruption. That is not exclusive to any OS or file system, that is just the nature of the beast.

Not really a common problem at all. UPS takes care of that. In the DB world: commit/rollback, and hot backups via shell scripts, so it's not much of an issue there either.


His reference was to a user bumping a power strip, not an IT person tripping the power to a backbone server. Of course you are going to have tons of redundancy in your data center with UPS, heck we have UPS and a back up generator. We got a lightning strike a few years back that took out our grid. The UPSes drained and the generator kicked on. The problem was the generator didn't power the cooling systems, so no air conditioning, so we had to take down all non critical and fan out the data center. Something to do with how our A/C units worked I was told, I am not an expert on A/C.

He was saying, some guy lost power to his mac and had to reload the OS LULZ macs are teh suck. I was pointing out the obvious that with any sort of disk I/O and power loss there can be corruption or loss of data.

Also, modern file systems are journaled, so it is rare when it happens. Even NTFS is journaled. If you lose power, it typically picks back up where it left off.

However, I have seen end users have 50 apps open at once with music, web streaming, videos, their office apps or whatever, and then wonder why it crashes when they try to open up a large file or an app like photoshop. So, when there is a user involved it just goes into the x factor for me. You cannot blame a platform for short comings if the user is doing non standard or abusive stuff.
 
2011-01-27 08:06:03 PM
HotSalsaZoot: xynix:
You're obviously not involved in deals that I am or my technical people are. My division alone which is only about 15 people closed over 100 million in business last year. Spending 175k on a technical guy that can also talk business with a CIO is frankly a pittance when talking the numbers we talk.

My techie and I flew down to Mexico last week and closed a $1.5 million deal with about $6 million in drag. Your "little business" is irrelevant when dealing with these kinds of numbers and finding the right person to make shiat happen costs real money. Not $60k a year..hell I'll pay half that in taxes in January alone.

A hundred mil a year is nothing nowadays. Closing a 1.5 mil deal is essentially like taking a piss at McD's to the real players in this area. You sound like a bloviated tech wannabee idiot who doesn't know shiat from shinola other than to blow figures out your ass. And anybody can quote any figure - after all, it's the net, remember? My dick is 15" long.
Oh, and my 'little business'? Like I said, you're a moron. You wouldn't know what I make or my revenues.


Right.. Which is why according to you hiring someone who's paid 175k a year is a firing offense. Lets chat when you join the big leagues pal.
 
2011-01-27 08:32:58 PM
drunkenmidnight Quote 2011-01-27 07:04:14 PM

The problem is, people like you who don't know anything else and just repeat only what you know.

>>>

Thank you for your insightful posts and level headedness compared to the typical Windows fanboys. IMO they love windows because they get to charge clients 500 an hour to fix all the headaches M$ causes.
 
2011-01-27 08:55:56 PM
nerd fight!

/been in IT for years
//i virtualized my mac into a vmware hyperthreaded core so that AD, Bind and LAMP stack can interface with the 'ps aux | grep oracle' and the iSCSI SAS RAID6 WAFL can partition the port 22 vdisk into gpedit.msc while i backup the exchange datastore with BackupExec plugin for SAP's mainframe COBAL-encoded 8-bit MIME diffie-hellman 256bit CAC Active Card gold-based SASL library. Drop the XFS transaction log, re-generate a UUID, remount the datastore while fdisk /dev/sda on my OC-192 bridged to 802.11n TIA-568A orange stripe orange green stripe blue'ed FCPGA 8x 32bit PCIx 64 bit wide 128 bit long 256-biatchunked 512-bit sectored 1024 bit encrypted 2048 bit factored sandwich.
 
2011-01-27 09:14:33 PM
drunkenmidnight: You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

I hate SQL server and .NET. Also Microsoft is losing tons of market shares. Things like Drupal and Joomla are taking over the web end. Postgre sql server is uber powerful compared to MS products.

AS/400? People still use that trash? We had AS/400 at my old job and it was hardly a good product, the problem is we were locked into it.

You obviously haven't been reading what I write. Look up MCX, and tell you cannot make all Macs consistent.

You see there will be a shift in the future, and those that can adapt and learn new products are going to survive a lot longer. The London Stock Exchange ditched windows last year. It is all Linux now.

Again, your back end can be whatever because you can make a Mac authenticate and talk to everything. You keep telling me you cannot manage them in an enterprise environment and don't even know the first thing about them.

Real enterprise sys admins you say? In my book a real sys admin is someone that can get the job done with any technology, and can fully use the command line of all products and fully automate all processes including reverse engineering existing third party products to fit your needs or to write your own.

I know several giant companies/organizations that run Macs with zero Mac servers. They push out updates and manage their clients with no Mac servers.

The problem is, people like you who don't know anything else and just repeat only what you know.


So.. .Macs are awesome and it's people like me that are stopping them from being 100% of the enterprise IT computer base because I fail to recognize them for their awesomeness. Got it.

I guess I don't understand how I'm supposed to do my job without Solarwinds, OneNote, VmWare vSphere client, Core Impact, etc...

I know you want to believe that every single thing that is done on a Windows machine can easily be done on a Mac, but please... tell me how to run Solarwinds Engineer's Toolset, or any other Solarwinds tools on a Mac.

Macs serve their purpose for the consumer because everything they need "just works". Windows serve their purpose for the business environment because they need is just "available".

It's possible I could find a replacement tool for this piece or that piece, but that takes a lot of time and effort to cobble together and to maintain. This adds to the burden of most over-worked IT admins. On a Windows machine I just run my Solarwinds installer, add the license, and I've got all my tools. It takes about 20 minutes. How long would it take to do all that on a Mac? First I'd have to hunt down each available tool... many of them might not exist. Then I'd have to download, install, and tweak them. By the time I got some of my tools online, I could have already been using my tool for the last 600 hours.

The other thing you're trying to convince and yourself of is that Macs are Linux, and Linux adopters = Mac adopters. That is not the case. By your logic, a Cisco Nexus 7000 which is based on Linux is basically the equivalent of a Mac. Or I guess you'll try and tell me that Oracle basically runs on Mac because it runs on Red Hat, which is linux, which is basically a Mac.

I know you have this idea that Macs aren't part of the enterprise because IT people just fail to see their awesomeness, but that only makes you an Apple fan-boy with no real experience in any real IT environment.

I'm the IT guy and I need 500 workstations.

I can buy 500 of the exact same Optiplexes from Dell. I can make one or two images, all my software is available, and I just push the images and get my users online. Next year when we open another office, I can order 100 more of the exact same optiplex and just send my same image to them. I can have a reliable source of parts, and a reliable base of consistent machines.

I can buy 500 of the exact same Macs from Apple. I make one or two images. Some of my software is available. Some is not. Once I compromise and tell my network guys that Solarwinds isn't available because they fail to see the awesomeness of the Mac, I can image my machines. Next year when we open a new office, I order 100 of the new Mac... but that model is not available so I have to get the next model with a new OS. have to create and update new images, then support the different ones.

The difference on the Mac side costs time and money. Since they laid off my other sys-admin. This is why it's not done.

I guess in your world, there are unlimited IT resources that can be used so you can prove to the world that your consumer-centric workstation and platform should be the standard for the entire company.


Here's the thing. In my job, I've probably seen 150 different IT shops. These range from mom n pop businesses to Fortune 100 companies. They all use non-Mac systems for their back-end data. I've yet to see more than 2-3% of the workstations ever be Macs.

None of them, and certainly not me, have any real loyalty towards any brand, OS, or whatever. We don't use Macs because it's about not adding headaches to our lives. It's about lowering our labor overhead so we can use the money buy something else like a SAN or new firewalls, or whatever. It's about keeping our costs low for PCs so we can afford a new server for next year's growth, or whatever.

No matter what you think, this is not about religion. This is about business. You seem to think people that aren't like you choose Windows for the same reason you choose Macs... because it's your religion. That is not the case with the rest of us. We don't choose Macs because it doesn't make business sense. We don't have the resources to re-write all our apps because our ideology says we must use only Macs.


As far as technology goes, I'm pretty agnostic. I have never chose Macs because it does not make good business sense. The cost is too high, and the headaches are too big.

Most IT guys I know spend their time finding the best solutions for their business. They don't spend their time trying to prove their religion is infallible.
 
2011-01-27 09:22:10 PM
drunkenmidnight: His reference was to a user bumping a power strip, not an IT person tripping the power to a backbone server. Of course you are going to have tons of redundancy in your data center with UPS, heck we have UPS and a back up generator. We got a lightning strike a few years back that took out our grid. The UPSes drained and the generator kicked on. The problem was the generator didn't power the cooling systems, so no air conditioning, so we had to take down all non critical and fan out the data center. Something to do with how our A/C units worked I was told, I am not an expert on A/C.

He was saying, some guy lost power to his mac and had to reload the OS LULZ macs are teh suck. I was pointing out the obvious that with any sort of disk I/O and power loss there can be corruption or loss of data.

Also, modern file systems are journaled, so it is rare when it happens. Even NTFS is journaled. If you lose power, it typically picks back up where it left off.

However, I have seen end users have 50 apps open at once with music, web streaming, videos, their office apps or whatever, and then wonder why it crashes when they try to open up a large file or an app like photoshop. So, when there is a user involved it just goes into the x factor for me. You cannot blame a platform for short comings if the user is doing non standard or abusive stuff.


So the end-user or our PC techs were the problem because you have determined that OSX is infallible, and nothing can ever ever be said to change that idea.



Let me try to sum up your argument: Macs are perfect. The reason businesses don't save trillions a year in costs by migrating to them is because sh*tty IT people and sys-admins refuse to acknowledge them for their awesomeness. Got it.
 
2011-01-27 09:27:38 PM
Cubansaltyballs [TotalFark] Quote 2011-01-27 09:14:33 PM

I can buy 500 of the exact same Optiplexes from Dell. I can make one or two images, all my software is available, and I just push the images and get my users online. Next year when we open another office, I can order 100 more of the exact same optiplex

>>>>

I don't believe you at all, they change their builds all the time. Instead of the 755 you'll get the 760 or 780. You're just talking nonsense now because you know Windows and think of Mac as for elitist snobs.
 
2011-01-27 09:29:42 PM
Big Al: Cubansaltyballs [TotalFark] Quote 2011-01-27 09:14:33 PM

I can buy 500 of the exact same Optiplexes from Dell. I can make one or two images, all my software is available, and I just push the images and get my users online. Next year when we open another office, I can order 100 more of the exact same optiplex

>>>>

I don't believe you at all, they change their builds all the time. Instead of the 755 you'll get the 760 or 780. You're just talking nonsense now because you know Windows and think of Mac as for elitist snobs.


No. It's business. It never found it to make financial or business sense to yank out Windows and try and make a consumer-grade Mac replace it.

My specialized apps... they "just work" on Windows.
 
2011-01-27 09:35:42 PM
You say this because you bill by the hour to clients. You love Windows because it employs you 10x more than it should.
 
2011-01-27 09:45:15 PM
Big Al: You say this because you bill by the hour to clients. You love Windows because it employs you 10x more than it should.

I don't bill anything. I'm salaried. My company usually does fixed-bid projects. We rarely ever touch servers. I'm a network architect, not a PC tech.


Back in the day when I was a sys-admin or IT manager, I did have to make the decision on what systems we had. My director asked us to looking into our options.

Thin clients were out because the limited deployment and start up costs wouldn't be worth it.

Linux was out for the desktop because of the training costs involved with the move, and the incompatibility of about 40% of our apps.... our most important ones.

Linux for the server was in. Wherever it could be used, it would be... so long as we had a way to keep them patched.

Macs were out for the same combination of reasons for not choosing Linux for the desktop, and thin clients. Too much upfront costs that would never be recouped.


We were given free-reign to change anything that saved money or cost the same, and didn't impact the user's experience. That's what we did. We ran the numbers. It just didn't pan out for Linux, Thin Clients, or Macs to replace our Windows desktop.


I know. I'm a heretic. I don't subscribe to your religion so I must be your enemy.

My advice is, if you want to worship something, go to church and consider jesus... at least then you'll be in like company, and you won't cost a company untold millions.
 
2011-01-27 09:49:03 PM
So.. .Macs are awesome and it's people like me that are stopping them from being 100% of the enterprise IT computer base because I fail to recognize them for their awesomeness. Got it.

I guess I don't understand how I'm supposed to do my job without Solarwinds, OneNote, VmWare vSphere client, Core Impact, etc...

I know you want to believe that every single thing that is done on a Windows machine can easily be done on a Mac, but please... tell me how to run Solarwinds Engineer's Toolset, or any other Solarwinds tools on a Mac.


I am not familiar with solar winds but there is a plethora of software out there for network monitoring, and if you want to go high end, there are stand alone tools that don't require an OS. Personally I use open source tools, ntop, nmap, amongst many others. I also do use a windows app or two on my mac via crossover, wine, virutal machines, dual boot. So, not only does my mac run windows, windows apps, and the like, it also runs everything else, which a windows box will not do.

Macs serve their purpose for the consumer because everything they need "just works". Windows serve their purpose for the business environment because they need is just "available".

It's possible I could find a replacement tool for this piece or that piece, but that takes a lot of time and effort to cobble together and to maintain. This adds to the burden of most over-worked IT admins. On a Windows machine I just run my Solarwinds installer, add the license, and I've got all my tools. It takes about 20 minutes. How long would it take to do all that on a Mac? First I'd have to hunt down each available tool... many of them might not exist. Then I'd have to download, install, and tweak them. By the time I got some of my tools online, I could have already been using my tool for the last 600 hours.


If you are locked into a product, that is not the short coming of a platform. See my AS/400 reference. We used it at my last job and it sucked, and it was out dated even when I was there. When you buy into a platform like that, you are buying into it all together. The tech boom in the 90s have made some companies make some bad decisions, like spending millions implementing Active X web front ends for their back end. Then an open source framework like Drupal comes around and just completely blows it out of the water, but since you are locked into a closed platform you are stuck in that platform.

The other thing you're trying to convince and yourself of is that Macs are Linux, and Linux adopters = Mac adopters. That is not the case. By your logic, a Cisco Nexus 7000 which is based on Linux is basically the equivalent of a Mac. Or I guess you'll try and tell me that Oracle basically runs on Mac because it runs on Red Hat, which is linux, which is basically a Mac.


No, you are misconstruing my words. Windows is not Linux, Mac is not Linux, Linux is Linux. Linux is not even Unix. It is Linux. The thing is, since OS X is based on Unix, there is so much more flexibility for it communicating to other open source products. Will it be easy? Perhaps, what it will be is flexible. My buddy who also works in IT is the head IT manager for an ad firm. Back in the day when they got big and became a mutli million dollar company they built all their web stuff on ASP and .Net, and now some bean counters are just looking at the licensing costs and saying why do we need this? They are starting to convert everything to Drupal, and they are now hiring Drupal developers. In the long run, it will give them the flexibility to not only scale their services to the highest end of clients, but also the medium and lower end, by lowering their overall cost of ownership with the product. Oh and dude comparing Cisco's IOS to Linux is pretty ludicrous.

I know you have this idea that Macs aren't part of the enterprise because IT people just fail to see their awesomeness, but that only makes you an Apple fan-boy with no real experience in any real IT environment.

No need for personal attacks, we can leave that aside. We are having a professional discussion here. The problem I have is you have zero experience with the Mac platform and yet you are making all of these decisions and assumptions like you are an expert. Trust me, I have plenty of beefs with Apple just like I do with everything else, and I have dealt with a lot of different products and been in the field for over 10 years now. I have work hardware repair, help desk, network tech, and now I am a sys admin. I may not know the specifics of certain aspects because I have started to specialize the last 5 years of my career in client management and server management. I don't really deal with hardware or networking hardware anymore.

I'm the IT guy and I need 500 workstations.

I can buy 500 of the exact same Optiplexes from Dell. I can make one or two images, all my software is available, and I just push the images and get my users online. Next year when we open another office, I can order 100 more of the exact same optiplex and just send my same image to them. I can have a reliable source of parts, and a reliable base of consistent machines.

I can buy 500 of the exact same Macs from Apple. I make one or two images. Some of my software is available. Some is not. Once I compromise and tell my network guys that Solarwinds isn't available because they fail to see the awesomeness of the Mac, I can image my machines. Next year when we open a new office, I order 100 of the new Mac... but that model is not available so I have to get the next model with a new OS. have to create and update new images, then support the different ones.

The difference on the Mac side costs time and money. Since they laid off my other sys-admin. This is why it's not done.

I guess in your world, there are unlimited IT resources that can be used so you can prove to the world that your consumer-centric workstation and platform should be the standard for the entire company.


See this is where you and I are going to differ in a major way. I have one image, for all my Macs. I build pristine images and do package based deployments. Meaning everything is packaged individually, and then I create configurations and write shell scripts to pull down specific packages to users that need it. Quick example:

Design Student imaging process:
-netboot and image client
-client gets base OS + all packages via block copy
-client specific packages CS5 (wrapped up in AAME) a pixel editor, and various other design packages I have chopped up and prepacked
-all of that is done via block copy from an image file, and I can compile my configurations into individual images if I want a full block copy in one fell swoop
-image script kicks reboot, management framework initiates first boot script, local managed account gets created, client binds to server via naming convention function I wrote into script, and now the client can log in.

I don't maintain giant block monolithic images. I am flexible and modular. Everything I put on a machine is packaged up individually so I can create any configuration I want, with out having to create tons of separate images.

If I want to update the image I do so, but on an individual basis. If the OS needs to be updated, bam, I update just the OS package and place it on my server, done.

I guess in your world, there are unlimited IT resources that can be used so you can prove to the world that your consumer-centric workstation and platform should be the standard for the entire company

In my world there is just me, I am the only sys admin for the Macs at my job I do it all. 8,000 clients, all a one man show. I have been published a few times in case studies and interviewed in CIO magazine when I was deploying dual boot Windows/OS X images when boot camp first came out. I love what I do, and I get better at it every day. However, I take the time to learn things like shell, apple script, perl, python, ruby, etc on my own time and test them out at work.

Here's the thing. In my job, I've probably seen 150 different IT shops. These range from mom n pop businesses to Fortune 100 companies. They all use non-Mac systems for their back-end data. I've yet to see more than 2-3% of the workstations ever be Macs.

I have said this to you now at least three times. I am talking about for clients, not the back end. The back end for Macs can use AD/Windows Servers, or it can authenticate to Linux/Unix LDAP and it is compatible with kerberos. I don't care what you run on your back end. Mac servers are nice for a few things but not needed to manage your client because directory services on the Mac platform is near identical on the client side as it is the server side. You just need to learn it.

None of them, and certainly not me, have any real loyalty towards any brand, OS, or whatever. We don't use Macs because it's about not adding headaches to our lives. It's about lowering our labor overhead so we can use the money buy something else like a SAN or new firewalls, or whatever. It's about keeping our costs low for PCs so we can afford a new server for next year's growth, or whatever.

If you look at what I have been writing I am telling you can make overall cost of ownership of Mac clients cheaper than you think, not to mention when you factor in overall cost of ownership you factor in user productivity.

As far as technology goes, I'm pretty agnostic. I have never chose Macs because it does not make good business sense. The cost is too high, and the headaches are too big.


Everything has it's place, and I already established that earlier. I have a different approach. I don't look at monolithic ideas like all-in-one images for systems, and I look at road map flexibility. If we have to change things around 2 years from now, 5 years from now, 10 years from now, is that possible, can I manage that? I certainly don't like getting locked in to a product. A lot of big hitters have lost and are losing market share. Open source is gaining. Slow, but sure. There will be a time at some point where it is safe to assume you must make A and B work together. Which is why I take a packaged based approach to client management, and I look at technologies where if I had to drop something and live with out it, do I have a plan B?

The fact that a Macintosh computer can be inserted into existing back end infrastructure and managed from a Mac back bone, a Windows back bone, or a Linux back bone is certainly impressive. The fact they offer great end user experiences is certainly impressive. The fact that Macs have a longer life cycle is certainly impressive.

I don't work for apple nor do I own their stock so I could care less if you buy them or not. What I am simply pointing out is that for once in our lives there is an alternative to Windows that actually works, and it can be beneficiary and flexible.

Most IT guys I know spend their time finding the best solutions for their business. They don't spend their time trying to prove their religion is infallible.

I agree, except Odin will beat up your God :)
 
2011-01-27 09:50:04 PM
You think all companies work like yours? Some just need the basics and an osx server with mac clients works fine. Nobody said it was for everybody, just that people write them off so quickly for no real good reasons. You have valid reasons but your environment is not everyone elses.
 
2011-01-27 10:00:11 PM
Big Al: You think all companies work like yours? Some just need the basics and an osx server with mac clients works fine. Nobody said it was for everybody, just that people write them off so quickly for no real good reasons. You have valid reasons but your environment is not everyone elses.

The problem is, these big deployments are locked into a product. 15 years ago Novell started an idea, MS ripped it off, and everyone else was playing catch up until recently.

The stuff I am talking about is relatively new and unknown to most IT people. They just assume there are no alternatives. In retrospect there are also some products which are proven great and have lasted the test of time.

People also fear change. Change can also cost money, and if your product cannot play nice with what is in place, then your product will fail.

Apple is weird about the Enterprise level stuff, they aren't sure what to do, however third party has made it possible, so has open source, and Apple has been tossing them a few bones here and there.

I am still learning how it all works myself, so I am by no means an certified expert. I am not writing books on the subject, but at least I am trying to keep an open mind and I do keep up with my skills on all platforms as best I can.

If I had a client and he said I want all Windows, no Mac no Linux, I would give my client what my client wants. If my client said, I want to accomplish this and be flexible for change, I may show them what I have been currently working with.
 
2011-01-27 10:01:55 PM
drunkenmidnight: Oh and dude comparing Cisco's IOS to Linux is pretty ludicrous

You clearly know nothing about Cisco products. Nexus products run NX-OS... which is linux based.


The rest of your statement is about justifying how your business decision is the decision for everyone. History, the numbers, and the trend suggest my business decision is the more likely one.

So basically your solution is to buy Macs and run virtualized MS? The problem is most IT shops barely have enough money to keep them afloat as it is, and would get laughed out of the room to add such an additional cost.

Management: "So we're going to spend $2mil to migrate to Mac?"

IT Guy: "Yep, it's going to be awesome. If we have apps that aren't compatible, it won't be our fault, it'll be a deficiency of the software, not the Macs"

Management: "Will our homemade Oracle apps work?"

IT Guy: "No, but we'll just run a virtual Windows session to handle all that"

Management: "So, will we still have to pay our MS licensing fee?"

IT Guy: "Yes, no costs go away. We're just going to spend extra money on Macs"

Management: "And you thought this was a good idea?"

IT Guy: "Yeah!!! It'll be awesome!!! We'll be an all Mac environment!!! Except for the 50% of systems with virtual Windows, we'll be totally pure!!!"

Management: "How much time did you spend coming up with this idea and researching it?"

IT Guy: "About a month"

Management: "So.... you've spent a month coming up with an idea that will only add to our bottom line. I think I know an expense we can save"
 
2011-01-27 10:22:16 PM
drunkenmidnight: If I had a client and he said I want all Windows, no Mac no Linux, I would give my client what my client wants. If my client said, I want to accomplish this and be flexible for change, I may show them what I have been currently working with.

It's not always about want. I want a blowjob from Christina Aguilera.

It mostly comes down to math. What is the ROI of changing the entire platform? What benefit does it provide? Will it make our lives easier? Will the cost we spend upfront make it worth the effort?


I see the same questions when people are talking changing their networks from Cisco to Brocade, HP to Cisco, Juniper to Cisco, Cisco to Juniper.

It's a cost-analysis that happens in every IT shop for every platform change. If it's too expensive, too much work, or provides too little utility, or any of those things... the decision will be made to not change.


I've seen customers with gigantic HP networks that won't move because the math doesn't work out. One day they decide to get Cisco VOIP, and the math changes. Now it becomes easier to deploy Cisco Voice on a Cisco network... so usually the decision is to build a new Cisco network with Voice and migrate everyone to that.


Every business is different. Most have limited funds. Most could not justify the ROI or prove the math on a major Windows-Mac change. Mostly because your software is not perfect, and it is not made for the enterprise. It is made for home users.

Whether you like it or not, a lot of customers are basically partners with their software vendors. I cannot do my job without SolarWinds or Core Impact. Those products are not available on Mac. I cannot convince my company to increase my workstation budget to allow a Mac and virtual Windows. Should I quit my job in protest? I don't f*cking think so.

Companies have tools that allow them to make money. Sometimes these tools are ONLY available on Windows. This is not a deficiency. This is not right or wrong. This is just how it is. If their mission-critical app is not available on Macs, that doesn't mean anything is deficient or superior. It just means Macs are not compatible with their business. Most companies aren't going to gut their ENTIRE infrastructure just to make a workstation migration possible. It's just not going happen.


You need to get over your religious zealotry towards the infallibility of Macs and start to realize that not every business is like yours. Not every IT shop is like yours. Not every end user is like yours.

If Macs truly were superior, they would be much more prevalent in the Enterprise. They are not. You may be the unique case where Macs can accomplish every single thing your users want done. This is not the norm, and you should really try and understand that instead of trying to prove how if we can't make Macs accomplish every single business goal our companies have, then we are somehow bad IT people.

You are a Mac expert, and a zealot. You need to get over pushing your religion onto other people.

That is another reason Macs convert the same number of PCs as those Mormons convert by knocking on doors. Your approach is wrong, and your attitude is annoying. You want to force the world into your system instead of being more inclusive of systems that are not yours.

You want me to be a tithing member of your church, but I can't bring SolarWinds or Core Impact with me. If that's the cost of admittance... no thanks.
 
2011-01-27 10:33:01 PM
Cubansaltyballs: It's not always about want. I want a blowjob from Christina Aguilera.

I want you to have to wait until I'm done.
 
2011-01-27 10:35:52 PM
If a company can't make a product that runs on a Unix environment they shouldn't be making products.
 
2011-01-27 10:45:35 PM
Big Al: If a company can't make a product that runs on a Unix environment they shouldn't be making products.

Cool. Good to know.

Wow. You really think Apple shouldn't be making products? that's pretty bold. I'm not the biggest fan, but I think they have a right to exist and make software their users want. I mean, just because they don't make a version of iTunes for my Ubuntu Netbook, doesn't mean they "shouldn't be making products"...

I mean, really... iTunes is only the single most popular media application out there. I guess if they can't port that over to to the most popular version of Linux, they definitely should not be making products.
 
2011-01-27 11:11:32 PM
OSX can't be installed on your windows computer? You sure about that? I'm sure if there was demand for it, Apple would release a version compatible with it. Keep living in your monopoly because it pays the bills. Just don't go forcing it on us.
 
2011-01-27 11:28:01 PM
Big Al: OSX can't be installed on your windows computer? You sure about that? I'm sure if there was demand for it, Apple would release a version compatible with it. Keep living in your monopoly because it pays the bills. Just don't go forcing it on us.

Huh?

Have you been huffing glue?

Since when is an Ubuntu Netbook a monopoly? Since when is Ubuntu Windows? And since when has iTunes become OSX?

I think it's pretty clear you don't have the foggiest clue of what the f*ck you're talking about and you should go back to telling all the other maniacs in the nuthouse how you're an IT god.
 
2011-01-28 01:09:39 AM
Why do you keep insisting making up these claims I have supposedly said? When did I even say I worked in IT? I said a good program runs on many different flavors to give you options, which is cheaper in the long run. You want everything in one box for one big price and couldn't care less about the rest of the world. Making claims like Mac can't run everything a business needs just because you prefer Windows is the most narrow minded view I've ever seen, sounds to me like you're the one in the nut house bragging about your street cred. Look you work for M$ they give you a paycheck, but last time I checked you weren't in their marketing department. They can do no wrong, I know, there are many out there like you who blindly say this to justify your overflated paycheck.
 
2011-01-28 01:29:43 AM
Big Al: Look you work for M$ they give you a paycheck

overplayed your hand there - you had me hooked until that line.
 
2011-01-28 02:48:54 AM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: If I had a client and he said I want all Windows, no Mac no Linux, I would give my client what my client wants. If my client said, I want to accomplish this and be flexible for change, I may show them what I have been currently working with.

It's not always about want. I want a blowjob from Christina Aguilera.

It mostly comes down to math. What is the ROI of changing the entire platform? What benefit does it provide? Will it make our lives easier? Will the cost we spend upfront make it worth the effort?


I see the same questions when people are talking changing their networks from Cisco to Brocade, HP to Cisco, Juniper to Cisco, Cisco to Juniper.

It's a cost-analysis that happens in every IT shop for every platform change. If it's too expensive, too much work, or provides too little utility, or any of those things... the decision will be made to not change.


I've seen customers with gigantic HP networks that won't move because the math doesn't work out. One day they decide to get Cisco VOIP, and the math changes. Now it becomes easier to deploy Cisco Voice on a Cisco network... so usually the decision is to build a new Cisco network with Voice and migrate everyone to that.


Every business is different. Most have limited funds. Most could not justify the ROI or prove the math on a major Windows-Mac change. Mostly because your software is not perfect, and it is not made for the enterprise. It is made for home users.

Whether you like it or not, a lot of customers are basically partners with their software vendors. I cannot do my job without SolarWinds or Core Impact. Those products are not available on Mac. I cannot convince my company to increase my workstation budget to allow a Mac and virtual Windows. Should I quit my job in protest? I don't f*cking think so.

Companies have tools that allow them to make money. Sometimes these tools are ONLY available on Windows. This is not a deficiency. This is not right or wrong. This is just how it is. If their mission-critical app is not available on Macs, that doesn't mean anything is deficient or superior. It just means Macs are not compatible with their business. Most companies aren't going to gut their ENTIRE infrastructure just to make a workstation migration possible. It's just not going happen.


You need to get over your religious zealotry towards the infallibility of Macs and start to realize that not every business is like yours. Not every IT shop is like yours. Not every end user is like yours.

If Macs truly were superior, they would be much more prevalent in the Enterprise. They are not. You may be the unique case where Macs can accomplish every single thing your users want done. This is not the norm, and you should really try and understand that instead of trying to prove how if we can't make Macs accomplish every single business goal our companies have, then we are somehow bad IT people.

You are a Mac expert, and a zealot. You need to get over pushing your religion onto other people.

That is another reason Macs convert the same number of PCs as those Mormons convert by knocking on doors. Your approach is wrong, and your attitude is annoying. You want to force the world into your system instead of being more inclusive of systems that are not yours.

You want me to be a tithing member of your church, but I can't bring SolarWinds or Core Impact with me. If that's the cost of admittance... no thanks.


see the thing is I can probably sys admin my way around you in circles while drunk.

You keep spitting out the same idiotic bs every other moron does. Big business, as in the top 5% run off open source. I could walk into a data center and acclimate myself and write my own code to accomplish tasks with out having to rely on big business, and you probably cannot.

There will be a market shift I guarantee it and it is already happening and you will cling to only what you know.
 
2011-01-28 03:42:25 AM
xynix: It's happening in the private sector too. We've always had problems finding good IT folks and the .COM crash didn't help. A lot of students who were going into IT switched during 2003 so instead of having more come into the industry in 2007 we had much less than we needed.

In addition to that we have IT burn out where people leave the industry all together. I've had two friends move from IT, one went to go drive trucks, the other started a small produce company and drives trucks.

The money is good though and I try to encourage everyone I can to get into the field. An average salary of $70k a year and after 10 years you can easily be making $150k a year.


Know how you get good IT people? Same as any other job... you take someone with some knowledge (say, a college graduate or someone who has been to a trade school...) then... YOU TRAIN THEM IN YOUR SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES.
Once that's done, you have a fully functioning employee who makes money for the company.

At least that's the way it used to be done.

See, too many employers have forgotten the "TRAIN" part, and expect all the people they hire to come fully formed, like tetris blocks falling out of the sky to fit perfectly in place and get you four levels at once. There are candidates out there, some I went to school with, who are working at sandwich shops, WalMart, Home Depot, and as security guards - with undergrad CS and other degrees firmly under their belt.

Why are they not working in IT or IT related fields, one might ask?

Well, when ads from employers ask for 2 - 5 years or more experience in a language, system or something written in-house that only four people on the planet know how to use (and two are dead), it tends to shrink that candidate pool pretty damn fast. This is also why there is so much burnout... instead of hiring the people they need, too many employers hire the people they want, and the numbers never match. Pool shrinks again.
They ask for someone with years and years worth of experience, but want to pay them like a noob, then whine, stamp their feet and act surprised when they don't get exactly what they want.

tl;dr - employers are going to find that as the boomers retire, those that can retire WILL be taking their knowledge with them, and they need to bring new people in and train them to fill the gap. Yes, they may lose money short term, but if they do not do this they will lose their companies long term.
 
2011-01-28 06:18:11 AM
xynix:

Right.. Which is why according to you hiring someone who's paid 175k a year is a firing offense. Lets chat when you join the big leagues pal.

No, my point was hiring a tech mouthpiece @ 175K a year is not only moronic, but would be an offense where termination would strongly be considered. And what would we have to chat about? I have my own company & you're not 'big leagues' by any stretch.
Good try & thanks for playing.
 
2011-01-28 07:43:39 AM
Cubansaltyballs: Companies have tools that allow them to make money. Sometimes these tools are ONLY available on Windows. This is not a deficiency. This is not right or wrong. This is just how it is.

Excellent points.

I just had the boss's son join the company from college. He brought in his laptop, a Mac. I said to him the best I can provide you is internet access via the guest network. I mean, sure there probably exists tools or kludges that will allow him to join the domain, use our business apps, or browse the product documents. But I simply don't have the time or resources to set up or support any of that.

A lot of times even if something is possible, it doesn't mean that you should do it.
 
2011-01-28 11:56:32 AM
drunkenmidnight: You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

You know how I know you aren't in the IT business?
 
2011-01-28 12:04:09 PM
TFA shows how state government IT departments will become even worse shiatholes than they are now. If a boomer retires and it takes two people to replace him, but due to cutbacks they only hire one nitwit instead - that's not more demand for IT jobs. That's a shiathouse that no decent employee or contractor would want any part of.
 
2011-01-28 12:16:07 PM
ZigThis: TFA shows how state government IT departments will become even worse shiatholes than they are now. If a boomer retires and it takes two people to replace him, but due to cutbacks they only hire one nitwit instead - that's not more demand for IT jobs. That's a shiathouse that no decent employee or contractor would want any part of.

So you're saying the states will save money by only paying for one useless salary instead of two?

From the state IT groups I've seen, they could fire 80% of the people and no one would really notice.
 
2011-01-28 01:33:11 PM
Bag of Hammers: drunkenmidnight: You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

You know how I know you aren't in the IT business?


Just look at the open source and mac related IT jobs in every major city. They are growing everyday.
 
2011-01-28 01:58:33 PM
drunkenmidnight: Bag of Hammers: drunkenmidnight: You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

You know how I know you aren't in the IT business?

Just look at the open source and mac related IT jobs in every major city. They are growing everyday.


You're trying REAL hard to blur the lines between Macs and Open-Source.

Is that the new marketing tactic by Apple? Try and make people believe it is open-source or the same as Linux?
 
2011-01-28 02:04:13 PM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: Bag of Hammers: drunkenmidnight: You sound just like every other person that suffers from monolithic unilateral tunnel vision. Name one thing that a Windows client can do that a Mac cannot?

You know how I know you aren't in the IT business?

Just look at the open source and mac related IT jobs in every major city. They are growing everyday.

You're trying REAL hard to blur the lines between Macs and Open-Source.

Is that the new marketing tactic by Apple? Try and make people believe it is open-source or the same as Linux?


No, I am pointing out there is a slow market shift going away from Windows. Those who want to deny it because of their window centric careers are the ones that don't see it happening. In DC a lot of government computers are going to Macs. I know this because my friends who work in software development write management software for Mac OS, and they have a huge client base in DC. The white house website just switched completely to Drupal, as well as the Senate, and guess what, every other major government site is migrating to Drupal.

I am not saying Windows is going to go away, but what I am saying is it won't be the standard anymore and you will see shops running Mac clients and open source back ends. Which a Mac client can easily acclimate to in that environment.
 
2011-01-28 02:32:54 PM
drunkenmidnight: DOUBLE MAC RAINBOW! OMG WHAT DOES THIS MEAN

Sweetie, I got nothing against apple, all I can you tell is what I experienced everyday in a field that I have been in for over 15 years. You can evangelize Macs all you want, all I can leave you with is what EVERY IT DEPARTMENT I have worked for has said when it is suggested we change from a Windows base sevrer/workstation environment to a Mac based one: No compelling reason to change.
 
2011-01-28 02:50:59 PM
Bag of Hammers: drunkenmidnight: DOUBLE MAC RAINBOW! OMG WHAT DOES THIS MEAN

Sweetie, I got nothing against apple, all I can you tell is what I experienced everyday in a field that I have been in for over 15 years. You can evangelize Macs all you want, all I can leave you with is what EVERY IT DEPARTMENT I have worked for has said when it is suggested we change from a Windows base sevrer/workstation environment to a Mac based one: No compelling reason to change.


See in my experience, and I used to sub contract on the side and consult, is that most IT department don't understand the Mac platform to begin with.

A lot of IT departments forget why they exist, and it is to provide the users with the technology and services they need, and to keep a productive environment.

Like I have already said about 10 times now in this thread....every technology has it's place. The Mac offers a more robust and intuitive end user environment, which can and will lead to high end user productivity. OS X is designed to multitask very well.

I have also stated now, 10 times, you can keep your back end with whatever you want because there are ways to manage a Mac locally. Directory services exists on the local machine and the server end, and they are near identical. The problem is, most IT people don't know the first thing about Macs, Unix based OSes, or that you can have a Mac acclimate itself in a Windows environment fine, for the most part. There are some caveats, and they can be annoying, but you can get it to work.

I have also met a ton of lazy ass video game playing at work IT people. They don't want to change platforms because it would make them work too much.

If any of you actually have a deeper understand on how the Mac works, then you would understand what I am saying. Instead you all keep telling me it is not possible, they suck, you can't manage them, so on and so forth.

Windows has it's place, thin clients have their place, Macs have their place. The one thing is, that Microsoft windows boxes are starting to not become the defacto environment in business. Many businesses are adding Macs to their environment.

-The government
-Military
-NASA
-Google
-Facebook
-Stowers (not well known but giant science research firm, stem cells is a big thing they do, and their high end science software is written for Mac)
-Universities have tons of Macs
-public education has tons of Macs
-Century 21
-Microsoft

Yup Microsoft buys a ton of Macs actually. They have a huge Mac lab, google it.

Read this article here:

Link (new window)

There is plenty of reason to switch.
 
2011-01-28 03:10:41 PM
SFSailor:

That said, I'll believe the job boom when I see it. Anybody in Balto/DC need a warm body to fill an abuse-laden and under-appreciated position? Sigh.


Actually, we're looking for a couple of folks right now. Based in Elkridge, MD. If you're IT-ish, my E is in my P, drop me a line and let me know what kind of position you're looking for.
 
wee [TotalFark]
2011-01-28 03:57:50 PM
Bag of Hammers: Sweetie, I got nothing against apple, all I can you tell is what I experienced everyday in a field that I have been in for over 15 years. You can evangelize Macs all you want, all I can leave you with is what EVERY IT DEPARTMENT I have worked for has said when it is suggested we change from a Windows base sevrer/workstation environment to a Mac based one: No compelling reason to change.

Macs make really shiatty choices when it comes to servers. I'll take twice the number of twice as beefy servers running Linux, thanks.

I just brought up four new machines in our cluster today, actually. Gotta love puppet...
 
2011-01-28 04:23:04 PM
30+ years of IT experience... been unemployed for over two years.

Can't even get an interview!

The fact that my last two job titles on my resume were 'IT Manager' means no one will even touch me even for grunt 1st level support jobs.

/can't even find minimum wage jobs
//now going to culinary school... at least that can't be outsourced to India
 
2011-01-28 06:27:17 PM
wee: Bag of Hammers: Sweetie, I got nothing against apple, all I can you tell is what I experienced everyday in a field that I have been in for over 15 years. You can evangelize Macs all you want, all I can leave you with is what EVERY IT DEPARTMENT I have worked for has said when it is suggested we change from a Windows base sevrer/workstation environment to a Mac based one: No compelling reason to change.

Macs make really shiatty choices when it comes to servers. I'll take twice the number of twice as beefy servers running Linux, thanks.

I just brought up four new machines in our cluster today, actually. Gotta love puppet...


We use Casper though I have looked into Munki and Puppet. Mac servers are good for Mac services only. Things like Podcast Producer and such. Otherwise you can run all other services off of other servers.

In fact I am looking at a Linux solution now to share AFP for home directories and package deployment.
 
2011-01-28 06:59:53 PM
drunkenmidnight: See in my experience, and I used to sub contract on the side and consult, is that most IT department don't understand the Mac platform to begin with.

A lot of IT departments forget why they exist, and it is to provide the users with the technology and services they need, and to keep a productive environment.

Like I have already said about 10 times now in this thread....every technology has it's place. The Mac offers a more robust and intuitive end user environment, which can and will lead to high end user productivity. OS X is designed to multitask very well.

I have also stated now, 10 times, you can keep your back end with whatever you want because there are ways to manage a Mac locally. Directory services exists on the local machine and the server end, and they are near identical. The problem is, most IT people don't know the first thing about Macs, Unix based OSes, or that you can have a Mac acclimate itself in a Windows environment fine, for the most part. There are some caveats, and they can be annoying, but you can get it to work.

I have also met a ton of lazy ass video game playing at work IT people. They don't want to change platforms because it would make them work too much.

If any of you actually have a deeper understand on how the Mac works, then you would understand what I am saying. Instead you all keep telling me it is not possible, they suck, you can't manage them, so on and so forth.

Windows has it's place, thin clients have their place, Macs have their place. The one thing is, that Microsoft windows boxes are starting to not become the defacto environment in business. Many businesses are adding Macs to their environment.


You're missing the point hombre.

You keep making this point that sys-admins are lazy or they suck or they're just too damn lame to understand Macs, or love them, or whatever.

That is not the case. I've seen sys-admins learn an extraordinary amount of new things in a short amount of time. I had a Server admin guy on my team learn Linux, and the Linux guy learned how to manage SQL.

I'm out of the server world nowadays, and I still get hammered with new stuff that I have no idea how to operate it. "Hey, do you know WAAS?" No. "Oh, well, a whole setup just arrived and you have 3 weeks to get it running and deployed."


The reason most sys-admins I've known don't know Macs is because they are not required to, not asked to, and don't have the time to.

If the CEO went to any of the sys-admins in this thread and told them they were going Mac... they would learn it, and they would manage it. I have no doubt about that.

The problem you have is, most good sys-admin's opinions carry some weight in their organization. So the CIO/CEO will ask, and they can't make the numbers work for such a thing. They can't back up the justification.

The problem is that the ROI math does not work. I've done the math, and it just doesn't. In our research, the capital expenses went up, the operating expenses went up, and the end user productivity went down during the learning-curve phase.


My best advice to you would be to stop trying to force your religion onto to other people. If it was cheaper and easier to go to Macs... every sys-admin would have done that by now. We don't worship any OS in the manner you worship your apple. We have jobs to do, and businesses to run.

We do not give two flying f*cks about what brand is used to get it done, so long as it is:

Easy or easier to manage
Cheap enough to justify to the budget committees
Meets the security requirements in place
Meets the regulatory requirements in place
Meets the needs of the end users

If it could meet all those things, it will usually get done.

But doing a complete workstation replacement to go from Windows to Mac usually doesn't meet all those criteria.


If you really want to get more converts to go Mac, you should really learn how to interact with people. We don't have your same business requirements, and we cannot use your solutions, so your response is to say we're too stupid to see the light of The Apple, peace and blessings be upon him.


My final piece of advice would be to change your approach to IT. If you were on my staff, you wouldn't be. Being an IT guy is not about seeing your religious prophecy come through. It is about providing technical services to people in the best way possible. If the best way for that user/company is Mac, so be it. If it is Windows, so be it. Your job isn't to advance your personal beliefs and ideology. Most IT managers don't put up with religious techie zealots, and that is a good thing. If you ever have to work in another job, or if you get a new boss, you might not last with your attitude. You have to leave your superiority complex at the door and focus on the best technical solutions... not your religious doctrine.
 
2011-01-28 08:46:36 PM
Cubansaltyballs: drunkenmidnight: See in my experience, and I used to sub contract on the side and consult, is that most IT department don't understand the Mac platform to begin with.

A lot of IT departments forget why they exist, and it is to provide the users with the technology and services they need, and to keep a productive environment.

Like I have already said about 10 times now in this thread....every technology has it's place. The Mac offers a more robust and intuitive end user environment, which can and will lead to high end user productivity. OS X is designed to multitask very well.

I have also stated now, 10 times, you can keep your back end with whatever you want because there are ways to manage a Mac locally. Directory services exists on the local machine and the server end, and they are near identical. The problem is, most IT people don't know the first thing about Macs, Unix based OSes, or that you can have a Mac acclimate itself in a Windows environment fine, for the most part. There are some caveats, and they can be annoying, but you can get it to work.

I have also met a ton of lazy ass video game playing at work IT people. They don't want to change platforms because it would make them work too much.

If any of you actually have a deeper understand on how the Mac works, then you would understand what I am saying. Instead you all keep telling me it is not possible, they suck, you can't manage them, so on and so forth.

Windows has it's place, thin clients have their place, Macs have their place. The one thing is, that Microsoft windows boxes are starting to not become the defacto environment in business. Many businesses are adding Macs to their environment.

You're missing the point hombre.

You keep making this point that sys-admins are lazy or they suck or they're just too damn lame to understand Macs, or love them, or whatever.

That is not the case. I've seen sys-admins learn an extraordinary amount of new things in a short amount of time. I had a Server admin guy on my team learn Linux, and the Linux guy learned how to manage SQL.

I'm out of the server world nowadays, and I still get hammered with new stuff that I have no idea how to operate it. "Hey, do you know WAAS?" No. "Oh, well, a whole setup just arrived and you have 3 weeks to get it running and deployed."


The reason most sys-admins I've known don't know Macs is because they are not required to, not asked to, and don't have the time to.

If the CEO went to any of the sys-admins in this thread and told them they were going Mac... they would learn it, and they would manage it. I have no doubt about that.

The problem you have is, most good sys-admin's opinions carry some weight in their organization. So the CIO/CEO will ask, and they can't make the numbers work for such a thing. They can't back up the justification.

The problem is that the ROI math does not work. I've done the math, and it just doesn't. In our research, the capital expenses went up, the operating expenses went up, and the end user productivity went down during the learning-curve phase.


My best advice to you would be to stop trying to force your religion onto to other people. If it was cheaper and easier to go to Macs... every sys-admin would have done that by now. We don't worship any OS in the manner you worship your apple. We have jobs to do, and businesses to run.

We do not give two flying f*cks about what brand is used to get it done, so long as it is:

Easy or easier to manage
Cheap enough to justify to the budget committees
Meets the security requirements in place
Meets the regulatory requirements in place
Meets the needs of the end users

If it could meet all those things, it will usually get done.

But doing a complete workstation replacement to go from Windows to Mac usually doesn't meet all those criteria.


If you really want to get more converts to go Mac, you should really learn how to interact with people. We don't have your same business requirements, and we cannot use your solutions, so your response is to say we're too stupid to see the light of The Apple, peace and ...


So if it is so easy and better why did Google just phase out Windows?

I've done and do the Windows thing. I know SCCM and AD, which is all you need to know really to manage windows boxes. A monkey could do it. It is easy.

I know NDS/eDirectory, Console one, Zen works, and zen imaging. Ghost, exchange, several very crappy help desk ticket systems, some very minor web development stuff, etc etc....

I can do it, and will do whatever I need to do at work. This isn't about me being zealous about macs. You have a huge reading comprehension problem.

I already stated, a dozen times now, if my client wants X, I will give them X. They want ABC, I will give them ABC.

See here is the problem. You have no idea what the Mac platform is at all. You probably don't know any of the basics, let alone any advanced details of the OS or the platform. Yet, you are trying to tell me over and over that I am wrong and your solution is cheaper.

Cheaper is not always faster, better, more efficient and sure as hell is not more secure. Also, Microsoft site licenses cost an ass ton, way more than software licenses for any other platform.

I also can manage Linux, Unix and OS X, which is more fun/challenging to me.

I don't really care what my bosses buy. Windows boxes, or Macs. I get to choose whatever computers I want at work and I have 4 Macs and 2 PCs in my office. I can manage windows boxes and servers from my Macs in my office. Regardless of what we run, I will just use my Mac to manage it.

You know but only morons who have no business in IT would ever want to deploy Macs, you know morons like Google....(that was sarcasm if you could not tell).

This conversation is over. You have no clue what I write about and you keep chalking it up to me being a fan boy, but you fail to actually read anything I am writing. How, other solutions outside of Windows are cheaper when looking at overall cost of ownership. That plenty of companies are turning away from PC/Windows work stations. They are going thin client, VMs, and Macs.
 
2011-01-29 12:53:52 AM
stultus: 30+ years of IT experience... been unemployed for over two years.

Can't even get an interview!

The fact that my last two job titles on my resume were 'IT Manager' means no one will even touch me even for grunt 1st level support jobs.


People like you make business managers' heads explode.
You have the experience they wish they could have, but you come at a price they're too motherf*ckin' cheap to pay.

And then they whine and complain to newspapers and websites like this one that "they can't find qualified people" when what they mean is "they can't find qualified people who will be so grateful we gave them a job that they volunteer to be chained to their desk in the basement (red stapler included) and fed the scraps from the company cafeteria six days a week."

They also seem to have a fear that you, with your experience and knowledge, will leave as soon as you find something better - because that's what they would do - instead of making the job they offer into the "better" you want to keep.

In other words, they want a Bentley for the price of a Toyota. They hate hiring recent college grads because they have little or no experience (but they can treat and pay them like sh*t), and they hate hiring those with experience because those people will ask for real money, knowing what they are worth.
I have experience in my field going back to 1991, but my resume only goes back to 2000. On purpose.

Yes, they are some greedy motherf*ckers.
 
Displayed 320 of 320 comments



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report