FARK.com: (5898170) "And so, I hereby pledge that, beginning on Feb 1, 2011, I will not mention Sarah Palin - in print, online or on television

If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

		"And so, I hereby pledge that, beginning on Feb 1, 2011, I will not mention Sarah Palin - in print, online or on television - for one month" (washingtonpost.com)		204
		More: Hero

• • •

19576 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Jan 2011 at 6:46 PM | Favorite | share:

Share this link:

URL:

http://fark.com/go/5898170

Bookmark:

Article Comments close

204 Comments (+0 »)

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | » | Last | Show all

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 07:39:53 PM

"And so, I hereby pledge that, beginning on Feb 1, 2011, I will not mention Sarah Palin - in print, online or on television - for one month"

TWAT!?!?!?

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 07:41:55 PM

kilgorn: GaryPDX: Yea, that'll last about 3 days. Palin's derp is too powerful for the left to resist.

Yes....

The unfortunate thing about this is, she has a 1000 gigawatt microphone. Gary, if you think she's a shallow vapid empty douchenozzle, please petition Fox Snooze to stop broadcasting her trollop droppings.

umad		2011-01-21 07:44:01 PM

Corvus: Why shouldn't people talk about her? She makes public speeches she makes public announcement to the press, she helps fun politicians. Why shouldn't we talk about and criticize her public remarks and actions?

Well, maybe you guys would have better luck if you supported fun politicians too. Nobody likes the boring ones. Call it a byproduct of our 24/7 news cycle I guess.

etyer		2011-01-21 07:46:44 PM

nrdgrl: I know! Let's declare February "Don't Mention Sarah Palin" month! Make sure you mention it on your blogs, and FB/social networking events all month long so others can know that you are not mentioning Sarah Palin and maybe they will play along, too! In fact, we should all change our FB statuses to "I'm ignoring Sarah Palin" and change our profile pics to a some picture of Sarah Palin! It'll be so great getting her out of our collective consciousness, even if it's just for one tiny month! I'm so looking forward to thinking about not thinking about Sarah Palin for the entire month of February!!

//!!!

Yep. The absurdity of this stupid pledge is self-evident. Dana Milbanks has nothing else to write about. So, he writes about how he won't write about someone he doesn't want to write about. Yet, that's all his article was; a writing about Sarah Palin. Posted to his readers who will read the article because it is about Sarah Palin. The hypocrisy is pretty high.

The day the media stops talking about Sarah Palin is the same day they stop talking about all the pop starlets (Britney and Lindsay, etc.). It'll never happen.

I feel ridiculous even referring to these columnists as journalists.

zahadum party planner		2011-01-21 07:47:00 PM

I think we should do this for ALL media whores left and right. When they say something/do something insanely stupid or offensive, we shouldn't give them oxygen. Like Limbaughs ching-dong-wing-wong routine the other day. Don't cover it. None of them. If they do something that is newsworthy, then fine. What that would be I have no idea, since we seem to talk about them because they're famous and they're famous because we talk about them, like the kardashians or paris hilton. but if they did it, then it would be ok to cover it. Now yes, this might let them off the hook when they do somethign racist (see the ching-chong-wong-dong routine above) but generally speaking most of the shiat is jsut stupid or aid to generate press. i.e. anything Michelle Malkin or Coulter says. With politicians it's a bit harder because if they're talking about policy or bills they want to draft, well that *is* news...

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 07:48:03 PM

umad: Corvus: Why shouldn't people talk about her? She makes public speeches she makes public announcement to the press, she helps fun politicians. Why shouldn't we talk about and criticize her public remarks and actions?

Well, maybe you guys would have better luck if you supported fun politicians too. Nobody likes the boring ones. Call it a byproduct of our 24/7 news cycle I guess.

That's a valid point. Kerry? Gore? Boooooorrrrrring!

Clinton? Sex addict! IMPEACH!!!

fark you tooo

Empty Signal Gray		2011-01-21 07:50:35 PM

Barakku : Empty Signal Gray: Good, I guess. Honestly, the left seems to have a Palin fetish. This woman farts and every MSNBCer spends 10 minutes ranting about how "Satan Farted Today! Coming up, Dennis Kucinich, Chuck Schumer and Janeane Garfalo will join me to discuss what it must have smelled like!!! Fark. Most of what this lady says doesn't matter, and I lean conservative.

I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Most of the conservative talk about her is defending certain absurdities posted about her, very little conservative talk I ever see (not that I watch most or much of it) is saying how great Palin is or that Palin has this awesome idea, it's almost unfailingly "hey, look what some dumbass said about Palin." I'm sort of in the same boat, I don't care for the woman but damn there's some stupid shiat out there about her. Leading up to the 2008 election it sounded like she could be an awesome candidate, out of no where a seemingly strong, female republican candidate. It wasn't to be.

I mostly agree. Again, I'm a conservative and I find myself agreeing with some of what Palin is "trying" to say. She's just not bright. And with talk radio, it depends on who you're hearing. Michael Medved, Dennis Praeger, Michael Savage, Dennis Miller and others simply don't take her seriously. But the fact is, she's become relevant. My point was that the more the left obsesses about her, the more sway she seems to have. The hateful sophmoric name-calling in a Fark thread is exactly what I'm talking about. Seriously, in the end she's just not that big a deal, unless her enemies keep making her one.

Chocolatey Shatner		2011-01-21 07:53:50 PM

Meh. Won't work.

Every New Years Eve, people resolve to be less offended by human nature and.. Well... Sarah Palin...

//who cares! The McRib is back!

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 07:53:50 PM

Empty Signal Gray: Barakku : Empty Signal Gray: Good, I guess. Honestly, the left seems to have a Palin fetish. This woman farts and every MSNBCer spends 10 minutes ranting about how "Satan Farted Today! Coming up, Dennis Kucinich, Chuck Schumer and Janeane Garfalo will join me to discuss what it must have smelled like!!! Fark. Most of what this lady says doesn't matter, and I lean conservative.

I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Most of the conservative talk about her is defending certain absurdities posted about her, very little conservative talk I ever see (not that I watch most or much of it) is saying how great Palin is or that Palin has this awesome idea, it's almost unfailingly "hey, look what some dumbass said about Palin." I'm sort of in the same boat, I don't care for the woman but damn there's some stupid shiat out there about her. Leading up to the 2008 election it sounded like she could be an awesome candidate, out of no where a seemingly strong, female republican candidate. It wasn't to be.

I mostly agree. Again, I'm a conservative and I find myself agreeing with some of what Palin is "trying" to say. She's just not bright. And with talk radio, it depends on who you're hearing. Michael Medved, Dennis Praeger, Michael Savage, Dennis Miller and others simply don't take her seriously. But the fact is, she's become relevant. My point was that the more the left obsesses about her, the more sway she seems to have. The hateful sophmoric name-calling in a Fark thread is exactly what I'm talking about. Seriously, in the end she's just not that big a deal, unless her enemies keep making her one.

Take away the douchenozzle's microphone then. If she really is irrelevant, she doesn't deserve the microphone.

keypusher		2011-01-21 07:55:04 PM

Farkers, heed this man.

phrawgh		2011-01-21 07:57:34 PM

Corvus: ...she helps fun politicians.

I think we all love us some fun politicians

/clowns

justoneznot		2011-01-21 07:57:46 PM

This article writing person is an idiot. First she writes 42 articles about Palin. There's no way to undo that and make it heroic. Now she's refusing to cover her at all even if it's actually news? Seems like there's some sort of weird love/hate obsession going on here. Kind of creepy. Oh and she could have just avoided writing about Palin, why did she need to write an attention whoring article to announce it first? Cover some news already.

MyRandomName		2011-01-21 07:58:56 PM

Bonkthat_Again: Haha....announced right before her husband's scandal broke

It's amazing the the left is so obsessed with one person that they care what her husband has done. You have turned politics into USweekly.

Fark policy debate, let's attack celebrity.

mcjam		2011-01-21 07:59:58 PM

Empty Signal Gray: Good, I guess. Honestly, the left seems to have a Palin fetish. This woman farts and every MSNBCer spends 10 minutes ranting about how "Satan Farted Today! Coming up, Dennis Kucinich, Chuck Schumer and Janeane Garfalo will join me to discuss what it must have smelled like!!! Fark. Most of what this lady says doesn't matter, and I lean conservative.

I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

You can see how they do right it here, people..... the RW creates and promotes these magnificently polished turds, and hollers to the hills about how magnificent and polished they are.

But as soon as the manufactured polish and magnificence wears off, and the populus sees that the turds wear no clothes, it's suddenly a "liberal creation."

Bravo, sir.... your emptiness is indeed a signal to all thinking people.

/But thank you for not using the term "libtard."

Nutsac_Jim		2011-01-21 08:01:47 PM

21-7-b: Let's ignore Palin, let's ignore foxnews and am radio, let's just ignore all the bad people trying to profit from the stupidity and animosity of the hillbilly and the saved

www.foxnews.com

Empty Signal Gray		2011-01-21 08:01:55 PM

Fart_Machine : Empty Signal Gray: I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Anecdotal evidence is the best kind of evidence. That's why Fox made her a regular contributor. It was for their liberal viewers.

Yeah, Fox puts her on, she babbles, she leaves. Then the left decides to parse everything she says. Suddenly, there's a controversy. The "blood libel" thing's a good example. What she said was pretty dead on, but, dammit, there has to be something we can use to start a fire. Why? Does this really not make sense to you?

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 08:05:29 PM

Nutsac_Jim: 21-7-b: Let's ignore Palin, let's ignore foxnews and am radio, let's just ignore all the bad people trying to profit from the stupidity and animosity of the hillbilly and the saved

I don't get your point. Please, elucidate, if you can.

Uncle Pim		2011-01-21 08:06:30 PM

21-7-b: Let's ignore Palin, let's ignore foxnews and am radio, let's just ignore all the bad people trying to profit from the stupidity and animosity of the hillbilly and the saved

That sounds like a good idea. Let's just sit back and wait and see how much they can fark things up

For realz. That's how Bush II got elected. No thanks.

X-boxershorts		2011-01-21 08:07:54 PM

Empty Signal Gray: Fart_Machine : Empty Signal Gray: I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Anecdotal evidence is the best kind of evidence. That's why Fox made her a regular contributor. It was for their liberal viewers.

Yeah, Fox puts her on, she babbles, she leaves. Then the left decides to parse everything she says. Suddenly, there's a controversy. The "blood libel" thing's a good example. What she said was pretty dead on, but, dammit, there has to be something we can use to start a fire. Why? Does this really not make sense to you?

She wasn't "blood libeled". That's a crock of shiat. She advocated violent rhetoric and the hillbilly redneck 2nd amendment remedy God and Guns crowd really are.....

YOUR PROBLEM NOW.

Reign them in, asshole.

PapermonkeyExpress		2011-01-21 08:08:25 PM

And yet, here is still another thread about her.

I bet there will be threads every several days just to show you crazy farks are still not talking about Palin.

/ seek help.... Seriously.

Fart_Machine		2011-01-21 08:08:33 PM

Empty Signal Gray: Fart_Machine : Empty Signal Gray: I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Anecdotal evidence is the best kind of evidence. That's why Fox made her a regular contributor. It was for their liberal viewers.

Yeah, Fox puts her on, she babbles, she leaves. Then the left decides to parse everything she says. Suddenly, there's a controversy. The "blood libel" thing's a good example. What she said was pretty dead on, but, dammit, there has to be something we can use to start a fire. Why? Does this really not make sense to you?

Yup, Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes are sekret liburals. After all she's one of the main voices of the Tea Party and we all know they're left of center. It has nothing to do with the main audience of Fox or anything.

Mugato		2011-01-21 08:08:54 PM

Empty Signal Gray: I'm a conservative and I find myself agreeing with some of what Palin is "trying" to say. She's just not bright. And with talk radio, it depends on who you're hearing. Michael Medved, Dennis Praeger, Michael Savage, Dennis Miller and others simply don't take her seriously. But the fact is, she's become relevant. My point was that the more the left obsesses about her, the more sway she seems to have. The hateful sophmoric name-calling in a Fark thread is exactly what I'm talking about. Seriously, in the end she's just not that big a deal, unless her enemies keep making her one.

What is it, I'm not trying to be antagonistic or confrontational here and I'm not looking for a flame war but what exactly is Sarah Palin saying or trying to say that you agree with?

As far as the "left" giving her some sort of power, she doesn't need that. She has thousands of followers flocking to her speaking engagements. So it's not the vitriol of the left giving her power. She already has that.

And I agree that the sophomoric name-calling is ridiculously juvenile. Whenever I read the word "libtard" I instantly discount whatever else the person has to say. I do see that sort of thing a lot more from the right than I do from the left though.

I'm neither a liberal nor a conservative. I'm a liberal on some things, conservative on others. That's not an ideology that is very well received by most farkers but I see it as a person who doesn't see things in black or white and certainly not a person who is bound by partisan bullshiat.

As for your "enemy" statement, Sarah Palin isn't my enemy. She's not Emperor Palpatine, she's not that smart. She's just someone who I don't want having the launch codes, that's all.

jake3988		2011-01-21 08:10:05 PM

GaryPDX 2011-01-21 02:31:19 PM Yea, that'll last about 3 days. Palin's derp is too powerful for the left to resist.
======================================================

You're finally admitting she's full of derp?

Well well well, we're finally getting somewhere with you.

Also, how about we extend that to... forever? She's like a paid media troll. Just like a troll on fark or any forum, stop feeding her... and when you do, she'll go away.

Nutsac_Jim		2011-01-21 08:10:07 PM

Fart_Machine: Empty Signal Gray: I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

Anecdotal evidence is the best kind of evidence. That's why Fox made her a regular contributor. It was for their liberal viewers.

This is just so that all the liberals would watch so they can gaggle together and talk about what Palin said the day before or what she tweeted.

It's a play right out of Howard Stern's ratings.

dbrunker		2011-01-21 08:11:05 PM

I'm a Centrist and won't watch Fox News, MSNBC or read political blogs. Sarah Palin's name gets mentioned on MSNBC more times, by orders of magnitude, than on Fox News. So, why are people on the Left so obsessed with her? Is there some psychological need Sarah Palin fills that I just can't understand? Don't tell me it's because she's an idiot, the world is full of idiots who don't get a tenth of one percent of the attention Palin does.

Why go to all the work of making mocking artwork, writing hundreds of blog entries and broadcasting critical news reports of Sarah Palin? She holds no political office and for that matter does she even have a steady job? Do people on the Left actually believe she has more than a snowball's chance of getting the Republican nomination for President and winning?
farm4.static.flickr.com

ImRonBurgundy		2011-01-21 08:12:55 PM

Baby steps.

phrawgh		2011-01-21 08:13:42 PM

I think it's rather quaint that some of us think there is difference between demopublicans and republicrats.

Nutsac_Jim		2011-01-21 08:15:27 PM

X-boxershorts: Empty Signal Gray: Barakku : Empty Signal Gray: Good, I guess. Honestly, the left seems to have a Palin fetish. This woman farts and every MSNBCer spends 10 minutes ranting about how "Satan Farted Today! Coming up, Dennis Kucinich, Chuck Schumer and Janeane Garfalo will join me to discuss what it must have smelled like!!! Fark. Most of what this lady says doesn't matter, and I lean conservative.

Take away the douchenozzle's microphone then. If she really is irrelevant, she doesn't deserve the microphone.

She could be on Fox 24/7 and it wouldnt matter. There would be nobody new to vote for her. Why is she on all the other stations all the time. Her being on the other stations is what brings in new voters for her.

office_despot		2011-01-21 08:18:37 PM

From TFA: "we in the press discovered that the mere mention of her name could vault our stories onto the most-viewed list."

Farkers, this is within our capability to change. If we don't click on every Sarah Palin link, they won't keep covering every moronic thing that comes out of her mouth.

There are intelligent conservatives, but she ain't one of them.

umad		2011-01-21 08:23:04 PM

X-boxershorts: umad: Corvus: Why shouldn't people talk about her? She makes public speeches she makes public announcement to the press, she helps fun politicians. Why shouldn't we talk about and criticize her public remarks and actions?

Well, maybe you guys would have better luck if you supported fun politicians too. Nobody likes the boring ones. Call it a byproduct of our 24/7 news cycle I guess.

That's a valid point. Kerry? Gore? Boooooorrrrrring!

Clinton? Sex addict! IMPEACH!!!

fark you tooo

Uh, ok. I promise to never joke about a typo again.

/Fark: serious business.

Hobodeluxe		2011-01-21 08:23:18 PM

dbrunker: I'm a Centrist and won't watch Fox News, MSNBC or read political blogs. Sarah Palin's name gets mentioned on MSNBC more times, by orders of magnitude, than on Fox News. So, why are people on the Left so obsessed with her? Is there some psychological need Sarah Palin fills that I just can't understand? Don't tell me it's because she's an idiot, the world is full of idiots who don't get a tenth of one percent of the attention Palin does.

Why go to all the work of making mocking artwork, writing hundreds of blog entries and broadcasting critical news reports of Sarah Palin? She holds no political office and for that matter does she even have a steady job? Do people on the Left actually believe she has more than a snowball's chance of getting the Republican nomination for President and winning?

maybe we want her to get the republican nomination?

Empty Signal Gray		2011-01-21 08:24:41 PM

mcjam : Empty Signal Gray: Good, I guess. Honestly, the left seems to have a Palin fetish. This woman farts and every MSNBCer spends 10 minutes ranting about how "Satan Farted Today! Coming up, Dennis Kucinich, Chuck Schumer and Janeane Garfalo will join me to discuss what it must have smelled like!!! Fark. Most of what this lady says doesn't matter, and I lean conservative.

I do know one conservative that hangs on her every word. The rest of us, nope. Believe me, she's more a liberal creation than you realize.

You can see how they do right it here, people..... the RW creates and promotes these magnificently polished turds, and hollers to the hills about how magnificent and polished they are.

But as soon as the manufactured polish and magnificence wears off, and the populus sees that the turds wear no clothes, it's suddenly a "liberal creation."

Bravo, sir.... your emptiness is indeed a signal to all thinking people.

/But thank you for not using the term "libtard."

I've never spoken or typed libtard. Well, until now. It's stupid, means nothing. And I didn't have anything to do with the creation of Sarah Palin. But you assume to speak for the "populus."

I'm empty? You don't know shiat about me, so here are a few chestnuts: I'm pro gay marriage. Or at least I just don't care. Get married and good luck. I'm pro choice. My emptiness tells me it's none of my business what a woman does with her body, although abortion's sadly often seen as this easy way out, a way to have your fun, then hide from the responsibilty. I said I was a conservative. That may not be wholly accurate. But if liberals and current day republicans would look at the true tenets of conservatism, they may be hard-pressed to disagree. To me, both the left and the right are off their rockers these days. Fark is a good example of the left gone wild, the right have their own vehicles for the crazy.

uprislng		2011-01-21 08:31:15 PM

phrawgh: I think it's rather quaint that some of us think there is difference between demopublicans and republicrats.

It is really depressing. I don't know if I even hold any more hope for this country, it doesn't even matter who is in charge. It feels like we're on a death spiral, where nothing is ever going to get done, and we'll never figure out how farking stupid we've all been until we're all already in the gutter.

NickBob78		2011-01-21 08:35:54 PM

Seems to go right along with black history month actually...

shirtsbyeric		2011-01-21 08:38:06 PM

He who uttereth the word Sarah Palin.

Oznog		2011-01-21 08:39:42 PM

You mean You-Know-Who? She-Who-Will-Not-Be-Named?

kimwim		2011-01-21 08:46:32 PM

justoneznot: This article writing person is an idiot. First she writes 42 articles about Palin. There's no way to undo that and make it heroic. Now she's refusing to cover her at all even if it's actually news? Seems like there's some sort of weird love/hate obsession going on here. Kind of creepy. Oh and she could have just avoided writing about Palin, why did she need to write an attention whoring article to announce it first? Cover some news already.

Who's an idiot? Could it be the person who doesn't realize that Dana is a unisex name? Could it? 207.56.179.67

Proud2B_American		2011-01-21 08:48:17 PM

Not trying to steal your pic, but needed to be said again...

Empty Signal Gray		2011-01-21 08:49:10 PM

Mugato : Empty Signal Gray: I'm a conservative and I find myself agreeing with some of what Palin is "trying" to say. She's just not bright. And with talk radio, it depends on who you're hearing. Michael Medved, Dennis Praeger, Michael Savage, Dennis Miller and others simply don't take her seriously. But the fact is, she's become relevant. My point was that the more the left obsesses about her, the more sway she seems to have. The hateful sophmoric name-calling in a Fark thread is exactly what I'm talking about. Seriously, in the end she's just not that big a deal, unless her enemies keep making her one.

What is it, I'm not trying to be antagonistic or confrontational here and I'm not looking for a flame war but what exactly is Sarah Palin saying or trying to say that you agree with?

As far as the "left" giving her some sort of power, she doesn't need that. She has thousands of followers flocking to her speaking engagements. So it's not the vitriol of the left giving her power. She already has that.

And I agree that the sophomoric name-calling is ridiculously juvenile. Whenever I read the word "libtard" I instantly discount whatever else the person has to say. I do see that sort of thing a lot more from the right than I do from the left though.

I'm neither a liberal nor a conservative. I'm a liberal on some things, conservative on others. That's not an ideology that is very well received by most farkers but I see it as a person who doesn't see things in black or white and certainly not a person who is bound by partisan bullshiat.

As for your "enemy" statement, Sarah Palin isn't my enemy. She's not Emperor Palpatine, she's not that smart. She's just someone who I don't want having the launch codes, that's all.

I think we're pretty much on the same side. Agreement comes with some general statements. Like the federal government's overreaching (which Bush really kicked into high gear, Obama just took the hand-off and ran). Also, her reaction to the weird blame the left levied after Tuscon was, I thought, quite coherent. But "Oh My God, She Said 'Blood Libel' Without Clearly Understanding The Historical Context!!!" became the story.

I disagree that Palin has any real power. She can be entertaining. She's hot. But a run in 2012 would be a slaughter. Any "real" power is an illusion, I think. Which is why I remain confused by the left's rabid, ugly obsession with her. Those on the right obsessed with her have their own issues.

By the way, I'm not looking to scrap, either. It's why I very rarely post. Calmish discussions don't seem welcome here. But some super funny people post on Fark, so there's that.

I_Can't_Believe_it's_not_Boutros		2011-01-21 08:49:31 PM

Empty Signal Gray: I'm empty? You don't know shiat about me, so ...

If you're going to be so offended about being called "empty," maybe it shouldn't be the first word in your screen name.

El Morro		2011-01-21 08:52:57 PM

Relatively Obscure: Pocket Ninja: Yeah, but wait until you see the article he writes on March 1.

I'm scared.

That article is going to be like the first night back after having to be apart from your significant other for an extended period of time when you're used to getting good booty on the regular.

Frantic, sloppy, a little silly and you'll be absolutely drained when your done with it.

Empty Signal Gray		2011-01-21 08:57:59 PM

I_Can't_Believe_it's_not_Boutros; If you're going to be so offended about being called "empty," maybe it shouldn't be the first word in your screen name.

Good point.

umad		2011-01-21 09:00:34 PM

Empty Signal Gray: I've never spoken or typed libtard. Well, until now. It's stupid, means nothing. And I didn't have anything to do with the creation of Sarah Palin. But you assume to speak for the "populus."

I'm empty? You don't know shiat about me, so here are a few chestnuts: I'm pro gay marriage. Or at least I just don't care. Get married and good luck. I'm pro choice. My emptiness tells me it's none of my business what a woman does with her body, although abortion's sadly often seen as this easy way out, a way to have your fun, then hide from the responsibilty. I said I was a conservative. That may not be wholly accurate. But if liberals and current day republicans would look at the true tenets of conservatism, they may be hard-pressed to disagree. To me, both the left and the right are off their rockers these days. Fark is a good example of the left gone wild, the right have their own vehicles for the crazy.

Well said. Although I have noticed that Fark liberals tend to hate the fiscal conservative/social liberal types more than they hate the social conservative retards, so I'm not sure you are doing yourself any favors by posting all of that.

/conservative with similar views

t3knomanser		2011-01-21 09:02:29 PM

Who? Is that the orange girl from that MTV reality show? I hear about her a lot. And her name started with an "S". Must be the same person, I imagine. I'm really bad at this reality TV crap, though.

Honkey Magoo		2011-01-21 09:05:26 PM

This benefits the right more than anyone. It's not like any of the coverage is flattering at all.

What was McCain thinking anyway?? Biden was a pretty terrible choice, but Palin ensured an Obama win in 08. Guess it worked out for me, I voted Obama, but we still have to deal with this idiot Palin for the forseeable (sp?) future.