If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.

(Gallup)   The number of Americans who believe in strict Creationism is down. That's good. It's still 40%. That's bad. At least we can all agree that the frogurt was divinely inspired. Mmm, frogurt   (gallup.com) divider line 654
    More: Fail, religion and politics, basic structure, postgraduate education, god created, steering, innovations, PRINCETON, Americans  
•       •       •

4443 clicks; posted to Main » on 21 Dec 2010 at 3:52 PM   |  Favorite    |   share:  Share on Twitter share via Email Share on Facebook   more»



654 Comments   (+0 »)
   

Archived thread

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all
 
2010-12-21 02:28:03 PM
Sad, really.
 
2010-12-21 02:36:10 PM
I'm going to leave this here, so that we all know what we're talking about when we discuss evolution:

i105.photobucket.com

That will surely prevent people from arguing against a straw man version of the theory, right?
 
2010-12-21 02:43:56 PM
if you believe that the modern english translation of a renaissance english translation of a latin translation of a greek translation of a collection of hebrew manuscripts is the "inerrant word of god"... you are a farking fool.
 
2010-12-21 02:49:44 PM
I admit, I am always kind of amazed when I meet a bible literalist. About 5 months ago, I was having a conversation with a few guys I know over beers when one of them, a medical doctor, brought up Noahs Ark as if it were a fact. During the next 10 minute real life flamewar, he admitted to being a Creationist and bible literalist. I was floored that this intelligent, educated man could hold such strict, not only irrational but ridiculous beliefs.

Side note: one of the other gentlemen in the conversation with us is a soil scientist. Needless to say, it didn't go well for the good Doctor.
 
2010-12-21 02:55:09 PM
FloydA: That will surely prevent people from arguing against a straw man version of the theory, right?

I see you're new around here.
 
2010-12-21 02:56:36 PM
I have a hard time believing this poll. I've only met one person in my lifetime that believed in Creationism (a strict Baptist).
 
2010-12-21 03:00:38 PM
FarkinHostile: I admit, I am always kind of amazed when I meet a bible literalist. About 5 months ago, I was having a conversation with a few guys I know over beers when one of them, a medical doctor, brought up Noahs Ark as if it were a fact. During the next 10 minute real life flamewar, he admitted to being a Creationist and bible literalist. I was floored that this intelligent, educated man could hold such strict, not only irrational but ridiculous beliefs.

Side note: one of the other gentlemen in the conversation with us is a soil scientist. Needless to say, it didn't go well for the good Doctor.


Yeah I guess I'm thankful that biblical literalist doctors are a scarce commodity.

I mean do you really want a doctor that professes biblical literalism to practice based on theory and processes developed from the application of modern evolutionary biology?

At least most biblical literalists have moved the goalposts far enough to support the idea of a spherical earth... baby steps.
 
2010-12-21 03:04:08 PM
Elzar: Yeah I guess I'm thankful that biblical literalist doctors are a scarce commodity.

Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?
 
2010-12-21 03:04:42 PM
Reading the results of these surveys only fuels my misanthropy.
 
2010-12-21 03:04:51 PM
The toppings contain potassium benzoate.
 
2010-12-21 03:05:14 PM
FarkinHostile: i am always kind of amazed when I meet a bible literalist.

The first and last conversation I ever attempted with a creationist began thus:

"If evolution is true, then explain the sun."
 
2010-12-21 03:12:43 PM
slayer199: I have a hard time believing this poll. I've only met one person in my lifetime that believed in Creationism (a strict Baptist).

Consider yourself fortunate. I have at least one student per quarter tell me that they "don't believe in evolution."


timujin:
I see you're new around here.


;-)
 
2010-12-21 03:13:10 PM
FarkinHostile: I admit, I am always kind of amazed when I meet a bible literalist. About 5 months ago, I was having a conversation with a few guys I know over beers when one of them, a medical doctor, brought up Noahs Ark as if it were a fact. During the next 10 minute real life flamewar, he admitted to being a Creationist and bible literalist. I was floored that this intelligent, educated man could hold such strict, not only irrational but ridiculous beliefs.

Side note: one of the other gentlemen in the conversation with us is a soil scientist. Needless to say, it didn't go well for the good Doctor.


I almost dated a guy in college that was in a biochemistry program and a creationist. To this day, it boggles my mind.

/yeah, he was gay too, obviously.
 
2010-12-21 03:16:23 PM
freewill:
Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?



If one doesn't understand selection, one ends up selecting for MRSA (new window)

(Possible NSFW/lunch image)
 
2010-12-21 03:18:32 PM
freewill: Elzar: Yeah I guess I'm thankful that biblical literalist doctors are a scarce commodity.

Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?


www.b12partners.net

And I might as well dust off this old chestnut:
i2.photobucket.com
 
2010-12-21 03:22:59 PM
Four in 10 Americans, slightly fewer today than in years past, believe God created humans in their present form about 10,000 years ago. Thirty-eight percent believe God guided a process by which humans developed over millions of years from less advanced life forms, while 16%, up slightly from years past, believe humans developed over millions of years, without God's involvement.

Unfortunately the 16% minority has been given free reign to impose their views on everyone else by controlling 100% of public 'education'.

...

Creationists will have to speak louder. I continue to support those who would like to have their voices heard in biology classes. I encourage the effort to limit the teaching of evolutionary biology until such time as evolutionists encourage a more inclusive participation of students. The very idea of the American Civil Liberties Union conspiring with evolutionary biologists to limit the free speech of the majority of the high school students in this county is grotesque. ~ William Provine

For I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced, often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to those at which I have arrived. A fair result can be obtained only by fully stating and balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question; and this cannot possibly be here done. ~ Charles Darwin
 
2010-12-21 03:23:02 PM
freewill: Elzar: Yeah I guess I'm thankful that biblical literalist doctors are a scarce commodity.

Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?


img.photobucket.com
 
2010-12-21 03:26:39 PM
FloydA: freewill:
Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?


If one doesn't understand selection, one ends up selecting for MRSA (new window)

(Possible NSFW/lunch image)


I guess I hadn't really considered being so strictly Creationist that you actually reject the notion of genetic variation, but fair enough.
 
2010-12-21 03:27:18 PM
Bevets sure does like to bear false witness.
 
2010-12-21 03:28:20 PM
ninjakirby:

*Shakes tiny fist*
 
2010-12-21 03:28:31 PM
freewill: Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?

Without using evolutionary theory, doctors and scientists have discovered vaccines (Jenner, in the 18th century, before Darwin was born), discovered that germs cause infectious diseases (Pasteur, in the 19th century, who ignored Darwin), discovered genes (Mendel, in the 19th century, who was a priest and not a supporter of Darwin's theory), discovered antibiotics, and unraveled the secrets of the genetic code (the key to these discoveries was the discovery of the apparent design in the DNA double helix). Heart, liver, and kidney transplants, new treatments for cancer and heart disease, and a host of life-saving advances in medicine have been developed without input from evolutionary biologists. No Nobel prize in medicine has ever been awarded for work in evolutionary biology. In fact, I think it's safe to say that the only contribution evolution has made to modern medicine is to take it down the horrific road of eugenics, which brought forced sterilization and bodily harm to many thousands of Americans in the early 1900s. That's a contribution which has brought shame -- not advance -- to the medical field.

So 'Why would I want my doctor to have studied evolution?' I wouldn't. Evolutionary biology isn't important to modern medicine. ~ Michael Egnor
 
2010-12-21 03:54:13 PM
I believe that there may be a God. There may not be. I'm not smart enough to know.
 
2010-12-21 03:54:36 PM
Bevets: freewill: Not to defend the guy since whatever he said was surely objectively stupid, but is there actually any aspect of the medical practice where one's beliefs about this would matter at all?

Without using evolutionary theory, doctors and scientists have discovered vaccines (Jenner, in the 18th century, before Darwin was born), discovered that germs cause infectious diseases (Pasteur, in the 19th century, who ignored Darwin), discovered genes (Mendel, in the 19th century, who was a priest and not a supporter of Darwin's theory), discovered antibiotics, and unraveled the secrets of the genetic code (the key to these discoveries was the discovery of the apparent design in the DNA double helix). Heart, liver, and kidney transplants, new treatments for cancer and heart disease, and a host of life-saving advances in medicine have been developed without input from evolutionary biologists. No Nobel prize in medicine has ever been awarded for work in evolutionary biology. In fact, I think it's safe to say that the only contribution evolution has made to modern medicine is to take it down the horrific road of eugenics, which brought forced sterilization and bodily harm to many thousands of Americans in the early 1900s. That's a contribution which has brought shame -- not advance -- to the medical field.

So 'Why would I want my doctor to have studied evolution?' I wouldn't. Evolutionary biology isn't important to modern medicine. ~ Michael Egnor


i457.photobucket.com
 
2010-12-21 03:54:47 PM
Sad.
 
2010-12-21 03:55:20 PM
It's not important what they believe until they try to impose it on everyone else.

40%, 60% 90%? I don't care as long as you keep it to yourself.
 
2010-12-21 03:55:40 PM
Bevets is just trying to save you guys from eternal hellfire. Why must you mock him so?
 
2010-12-21 03:55:43 PM
FloydA: That will surely prevent people from arguing against a straw man version of the theory, right?

tl;dr
 
2010-12-21 03:56:04 PM
FlashHarry: if you believe that the modern english translation of a renaissance english translation of a latin translation of a greek translation of a collection of hebrew manuscripts is the in an "inerrant word of god"... you are a farking fool.

FTFY
 
2010-12-21 03:56:18 PM
It can't really be 40%

I'm sure they could word the question slightly differently and get a different answer.
 
2010-12-21 03:57:08 PM
You fools, if evolution were real how come we don't see monkeys running around evolving in front of our eyes? Sheesh!
 
2010-12-21 03:57:23 PM
FloydA: That will surely prevent people from arguing against a straw man version of the theory, right?

i.imgur.com

THEN WHERE'R THE CROCODUCKS?!
 
2010-12-21 03:57:36 PM
while 16%, up slightly from years past, believe humans developed over millions of years, without God's involvement

Only 16% of the country operates in reality. We. Are. Farked.
 
2010-12-21 03:57:38 PM
slayer199: I have a hard time believing this poll. I've only met one person in my lifetime that believed in Creationism (a strict Baptist).

I've met more people that hold some form of Creationist belief than a strictly secular one regarding evolution.

One of these people even sent my wife the book "God Doesn't Believe in Atheists" by Banana Ray.

Good for a chuckle, then I had a sad because people take him seriously.
 
2010-12-21 03:57:56 PM
eqtworld: It can't really be 40%

I'm sure they could word the question slightly differently and get a different answer.


True or False:

It's turtles all the way down
 
2010-12-21 03:58:01 PM
breaking down the numbers by education level and church attendance is interesting but I'd really like to see the numbers broken down by region or better yet, county. I'm guessing the bible belt would be displayed in glorious color.

Some more good breakdowns of the Gallup results, including some shocking information that shows that the U.S. really stands alone in the west in views of the Bible as fact.

http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_publi.htm
 
2010-12-21 03:58:17 PM
ZOMG but if we evolved from monkies why is there still monkies???1?
 
2010-12-21 03:58:19 PM
www.theness.com

GIMME MY CROCODUCK
 
2010-12-21 03:58:21 PM
freewill: I guess I hadn't really considered being so strictly Creationist that you actually reject the notion of genetic variation, but fair enough.

Genetic variation + selective pressure + time = speciation
 
2010-12-21 03:59:07 PM
Spanky_McFarksalot: It's not important what they believe until they try to impose it on everyone else.

40%, 60% 90%? I don't care as long as you keep it to yourself.


That's a poor attitude, considering that these are the people that form your government, hold ranks on your children's' school boards, write text books and decide what goes on TV. Fighting the good fight is what you should be doing. Sitting idly doesn't accomplish much but ignoring the awe inspiring dumbness holding official offices all around you.
 
2010-12-21 03:59:40 PM
4.bp.blogspot.com

THERE'S MY CROCODUCK
 
2010-12-21 03:59:41 PM
*popcorn break*
 
2010-12-21 03:59:47 PM
FloydA: I'm going to leave this here, so that we all know what we're talking about when we discuss evolution:

Bevets: Unfortunately the 16% minority has been given free reign to impose their views on everyone else by controlling 100% of public 'education'.

We've seen your quotes before. Would you be willing to refute any of the points on Floyd's chart? I'm genuinely curious.
 
2010-12-21 04:00:02 PM
This thread is also cursed:

t1.gstatic.com
 
2010-12-21 04:00:32 PM
84% of people don't have a healthy-material based conception of their origins? Yea that sounds about right.
 
2010-12-21 04:00:39 PM
TofuTheAlmighty: freewill: I guess I hadn't really considered being so strictly Creationist that you actually reject the notion of genetic variation, but fair enough.

Genetic variation + selective pressure + time = speciation


img.listal.com

Sorry, just wanted to lock the thread in so I can keep watching Bevets violate a cornerstone of his faith (bearing false witness) to defend the preamble of his holy book.
 
2010-12-21 04:01:26 PM
DarnoKonrad: eqtworld: It can't really be 40%

I'm sure they could word the question slightly differently and get a different answer.

True or False:

It's turtles all the way down


I guess that depends on how you define turtle.

/I have not gotten to amphibians: I'm still stuck on the (Q V P) thing
 
2010-12-21 04:01:26 PM
knowyourmeme.com
 
2010-12-21 04:01:34 PM
Sybarite: Reading the results of these surveys only fuels my misanthropy.

Is that one of them hippie cars?
 
2010-12-21 04:01:38 PM
elchip: THEN WHERE'R THE CROCODUCKS?!

I'll tell you this: I want one.

/ Maybe to eat.
 
2010-12-21 04:01:51 PM
I want to eat a crocoduck.
 
Displayed 50 of 654 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | » | Last | Show all



This thread is closed to new comments.

Continue Farking
Submit a Link »





Report